Date post: | 13-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | itri |
View: | 1,366 times |
Download: | 1 times |
New PVC and EVA nanocomposites based on LDH’s and novel hybrid tin-LDH
nanoparticles
2
Why nanotechnology?Why nanotechnology?
Different nanoparticles, different effectsDifferent nanoparticles, different effects
Spherical particles
Lamellar structure
Tubularstructure
Silica, alumina, ceria, zinc oxide, …
MontmorilloniteHydrotalcite
Flame retardantStabilizer
Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers
Scratch and abrasion resistance, UV filtering
Electrical conductivity
3
Nanoparticles and flame Nanoparticles and flame retardancyretardancyMONTMORILLONITE
HYDROTALCITE
Cationic clay: negative charges of layers balanced by the presence of cations in the interlamellar gallery
Anionic clay: positive charges of layers balanced by the presence of anions in the interlamellar gallery
Mg(OH)64-Al(OH)63-
H2O
CO32-
4
Nanoparticles and flame Nanoparticles and flame retardancyretardancy
Why nanofiller as flame retardant?Why nanofiller as flame retardant?
• Higher specific surface area
• Lower quantity needed with respect to traditional particles
• Possibility of surface modification to promote the affinity with different polymers
• Improvement of mechanical properties
• Barrier effect of lamellas on oxygen diffusion
5
CimtecLabCimtecLab
R&D Laboratory in AREA Science Park (Trieste)
R&D Laboratory in Soleto (Lecce)
Two R&D laboratories Two R&D laboratories
6
CimtecLabCimtecLab
Main R&D activities Main R&D activities
design and development of high-performance
thermosetting and thermoplastic nanocomposites (low
gases permeability, resistance to cryogenic conditions,
halogen-free fire retardant materials, etc.)
development of novel polymeric materials from by-products
of natural origin
study of surface treatments combining sol-gel formulations
and plasma treatments
synthesis of nanoparticles with various techniques (sol-gel,
ionic exchange, etc.)
7
Synthesis and modification Synthesis and modification of LDHof LDH
Know-how and expertize of CimtecLab
Co-precipitation route preferred
Other routes under development
Synthesis routes Synthesis routes
Organic modification of Organic modification of
LDH LDH Needed to increase the compatibility between the nanofiller and the polymer
Ion exchange reactions used
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
2Theta
Intensity
d=7.54A
d=3.82A
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
2Theta
Intensity
d=26,32A
d=13,98Ad=9,58A
8
LDH nanocompositesLDH nanocomposites
OM-LDH nanocomposites: high degree of intercalation/exfoliation
Morphological analysis: TEM Morphological analysis: TEM
500 nm 100 nm44.000x 110.000x
Intercalated tactoids +
exfoliated lamellas
Experimental results Experimental results
Intercalated/exfoliated LDH nanocomposites obtained thanks to suitable
organic
modification
Synergy between LDH and phosphorous-based additives
9
ITRIITRI
• R & D organisation based in St Albans, UK
• Primarily funded by world’s major
tin producers
• Over 75 year history in tin research – tin metal, its alloys & chemicals
• Specific expertise in inorganic flame retardants & smoke suppressants
• ITRI’s Fireproof Laboratory offers wide range of fire tests, polymer processing & chemical / analytical services to industry
10
Current research Current research interestsinterests
Coated fillers & nano-particulate additives
Low smoke - zero halogen formulations
Nanoclays (cationic & anionic) & nano-composites
Natural fibres – flame retardancy, thermal stability, bonding in composites…
Fireproof - small scale polymer compounding & testing
11
Zinc stannateZinc stannate
Zinc Hydroxystannate (ZHS)Zinc Hydroxystannate (ZHS)
ZnSn(OH)6 ca. 40% tin by weight
Suitable for use in polymer processing at temperatures below
200°C
Zinc Stannate (ZS) Zinc Stannate (ZS)
ZnSnO3 ca. 50% tin by weight
Suitable for use in all polymer systems
12
Technical benefitsTechnical benefits
Very low toxicity – safe & easy to handle
Combined flame retardancy & smoke suppression
Action in condensed & vapour phases
Lower heat release rates
Non - pigmenting & low opacity
Synergy with other flame retardants (halogenated FR’s, inorganic fillers,
nanoclays)
13
Coated fillersCoated fillers ITRI developed processes for coating ZHS and ZS on to low cost inorganic fillers
US patent 6,150,447European Patent 833,862
Use of coated fillers allows significant reduction in overall filler loading Better polymer processing Improved physical & mechanical properties
14
Coated fillers - typesCoated fillers - typesCoatings Fillers
Zinc hydroxystannate (ZHS) Alumina trihydrate (ATH)
Zinc stannate (ZS) Magnesium hydroxide (MH)
Tin(IV) oxide Calcium carbonate
Tin(IV) phosphate ‘Ultracarb’
Tin(IV) borate Titanium dioxide
Typical coating levels from 2.5 – 10% w/w on filler
SilicaAnhydrous aluminaZinc borateSodium bentoniteNanoclays
15
The HYBRID projectThe HYBRID project
Why this project?Why this project?
Main object: to deliver a series of novel fire – retardant additives, each
individual product tailored to meet specific end application requirements
Three different ways to obtain the nanoparticles:
Intercalation of tin organic species between LDH lamellas
Deposition of tin species on to the LDH particles
Partial replacement of Mg/Al ions with Sn ions in the LDH lattice
16
The HYBRID projectThe HYBRID project
Why this project?Why this project?
Characteristics of novel additives:
inorganic tin – layered double hydroxide synergistic systems
flame retardant and smoke suppressant
non toxic
17
The HYBRID projectThe HYBRID project
Why this project?Why this project?
Second object: to enhance the fire – retardant functionality of cardanol, a
natural derived by-product of the food industry, and create a new plasticizer
to replace phthalate plasticizers
Cardanol is an oily alkyl –phenolic product (having up to 3 unsaturations in
the flanking alkyl chain) obtained by vacuum distillation of “cashew nut shell
liquid” (CNSL)OH
R
Cardanol
18
The HYBRID projectThe HYBRID project
Why this project?Why this project?
Increase of environmental concerns
Increase of regulatory activity in relation to certain types of FR
No toxicity (for example, replacement of heavy metal oxides)
Need of halogen – free additives
Need of replacing phthalate plasticizers
19
The HYBRID projectThe HYBRID project
Project tasksProject tasks
1. Synthesis and characterization of LDH including modification with ionic
tin species
2. Synthesis of synergistic tin – LDH FR additive powders including use of
nano-coating techniques
3. Development of novel plasticizer and additive dispersion
4. Compounding and characterization of polymeric nano-composites
5. Laboratory – scale fire test
6. Production and evaluation by industry tests of prototype cables
20
Experimental ResultsExperimental Results
21
LDH synthesisLDH synthesis2 different methods
NaOH/Na2CO3 METHOD:
• Precipitation of metal salts in a medium of
NaOH/Na2CO3
UREA METHOD:
• Urea is the precipitation medium for
metal
salts
• During urea hydrolysis formation of
carbonate
and hydroxide ions Incorporation of Sn4++ ions
22
LDH synthesisLDH synthesis
TestTest
ICP analysis
Scanning electron microscopy
XRD analysis
BET surface area
Malvern particle sizing (wet and dry)
23
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethod
Experiment number
Mg/Al/Sn atomic ratio determined from Icp analysis
Mg/(Al+Sn) atomic ratio
Particle size- dry (d0.5, m)
Particle size- wet (d0.5, m)
BET surface area (m2/g)
UREA1 1.1:1:0 1.10 5.0 6.39 31.3
UREA2 1:1:0.12 1.12 3.7 17.7 84.1
UREA3 0.24:1.0:0.46
0.16 86.6 21.64 230.8
UREA4 1.0:1.0:1.0 0.5 144.2 16.5 208.9
UREA5 1.0:1.0:0 1 271.0 - 69.0
UREA6 0.34:1.0:1.0 0.17 200.0 - 221.0
Tin precipitate
0:0:1 0 - - 205.3
24
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodXRD analysisXRD analysis
25
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethod
Hexagonal platelet structure of the hydrotalcite, which corresponds to the particle size results obtained on the Malvern of 5 microns
SEM: UREA1SEM: UREA1
26
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodXRD analysisXRD analysis
27
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethod
Hexagonal platelet can be seen, corresponding to the measured particle size of 3.7 microns.
However there is some agglomeration and particles do not seem as ordered as in UREA1
SEM: UREA2SEM: UREA2
28
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodXRD analysisXRD analysis
29
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethod
No platelet could be seen on the SEM, probably because the MG:Al stoichiometric ratio for this experiment is 0.24:1.
There are no characteristic hydrotalcite peaks shown on the XRD spectra
SEM: UREA3SEM: UREA3
30
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodXRD analysisXRD analysis
31
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethod
No platelet can be seen on the SEM.
Only agglomerated particles of tin oxide.
The XRD spectrum indicates that LDH’s are present.
SEM: UREA4SEM: UREA4
32
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodXRD analysisXRD analysis
Recorded on the precipitate formed when the metal salts were pre-mixed prior to addition of the urea
33
LDH synthesis – Urea LDH synthesis – Urea methodmethodICP analysisICP analysis
The Mg:Al atomic ratio is around 1:1 in the final product
In the cases of UREA 3 and 6, the ratio Mg:Al is 0.24:1.0 and 0.34:1.0; LDH lattice was not formed. This result is supported by XRD spectra which show no characteristic peaks of LDH
BET surface area determinationsBET surface area determinationsBET surface area highest when Mg/Al+Sn is low
BET surface area highest when tin content is high
34
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
Experiment number
Mg/Al/Sn atomic ratio determined from Icp analysis
Mg/(Al+Sn) atomic ratio
Particle size- dry (d0.5, m)
Particle size- wet (d0.5, m)
BET surface area (m2/g)
NA1 3.0:0.98:0.0 3.06 88.0 20.86 85.1
NA2 3.0:0.85:0.13
3.02 113.1 27.86 90.9
NA3 3.0:0.79:0.19
3.06 42.3 29.8 15.1
NA4 3.0:0.68:0.39
2.80 64.0 32.7 8.05
NA5 3.0:0.48:0.49
3.09 244.0 19.8 6.1
NA6 3.0:0.0:0.98 3.07 190.7 46.4 29.4
35
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
36
SEM: NA1SEM: NA1
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
No platelet could be seen on the SEM.
XRD shows the characteristic spectrum of LDH
Platelet are too small to be seen under the SEM
37
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
38
SEM: NA2SEM: NA2
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
No platelet can be seen on the SEM, only agglomerated particles
XRD suggest that platelets are present
39
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
40
SEM: NA3SEM: NA3
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
Agglomerated particles are visible
Hydrotalcite and magnesium hydroxy stannate phases should be both present according to the XRD spectrum
41
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
42
SEM: NA4SEM: NA4
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
Agglomerated particles are visible
Hydrotalcite and magnesium hydroxy stannate phases should be both present according to the XRD spectrum
43
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
44
SEM: NA5SEM: NA5
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
Agglomerated particles are visible
Hydrotalcite and magnesium hydroxy stannate phases should be both present according to the XRD spectrum
The level of LDH is very low
45
XRD analysisXRD analysis
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
46
SEM: NA6SEM: NA6
LDH synthesis – LDH synthesis – NaOH/NaNaOH/Na22COCO33 method method
Agglomerated of magnesium hydroxy stannate
47
ConclusionsConclusions
• Urea method is an effective method to produce well ordered hexagonal
hydrotalcite,
but is not compatible with incorporation of Sn into the system
• The ratio Mg/Al is not controllable using urea
• With NaOH/Na2CO3 method the concentrations are much greater than those
used in the
Urea method, the XRD spectra are similar but the size is smaller than 5 microns
• The “optimum” experiment which forms the highest yield of LDH with the
highest
amountof Sn is NA3. It is interesting to evaluate if Sn can be maximised
The next phase of the project is to determine the fire retardant benefits of LDH
with incorporated tin compared with those of a standard LDH
Thank you for your attentionThank you for your attention