Date post: | 30-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jainneha85 |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 33
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
1/36
678'
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
2/36
1680(5%(+$9
,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
7$%/(2)&217(176
INTRODUCTION
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
EXPLORATORY STUDY
/,7(5$785(5(9,(:
,1',$10,/.%(9(5$*(&2168037,21+$%,760,/.&2168037,21%(+$9,285
&21&/86,21)520/,7(5$785(6859(
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
3/36
0(5%(+$9,28
572:$5'67+(38
5&+$6(2)+($/7+
)22''5,1.6_
77(67
$1$/
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
4/36
1680(5%(+$9
,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
INTRODUCTION
India, the worlds largest malt-based drinks market, accounts for 22% of theworlds retail volume sales. These drinks are traditionally consumed as milk
substitutes and marketed as a nutritious drink, mainly consumed by the old,
the young and the sick. HFDs are mainly targeted at children aged 5-18 years.
The kids are active and play during this age and the pressure is on the home
maker to keep the energy level of the kids high using some drinks. The HFD
category comprises of two sub-categories Brown Powder and White
Powder. While the white drink finds a bigger market in South and East, thebrown one makes its presence felt in North and West. White drinks account
for almost two-thirds of the market. Currently, brown drinks (cocoa-based)
continue to grow at the expense of white drinks like Horlicks and Complan.
The share of brown drinks has increased from about 32% to 35% over the last five years. Cadburys
Bournvita is the leader in the brown drink segment with a market share of around 18%. India has a
thriving Rs.2,000-crore health food drinks market, with many global players, like the market leader,
GlaxoSmithKline (Horlicks, Boost, Viva and Maltova), Cadbury (Bournvita), Nestle (Milo),
Heinz (Complan). Glaxo rules the Indian HFD market with a share of around 64%.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVE
This project is undertaken with an objective to understand the buyers behaviour in the Health
Food Drinks (HFD) category. Through this study, we intend to find the answers to these questions:
What are the prominent factors that drive a customer to purchase a HFD?
What are the various customer segments that buy a HFD?
What are the sources of information for these customer segments?
We also look at the current positioning strategy of two leading brands of the HFD Category in India
i.e. Cadburys Bournvita and GlaxoSmithKlines Horlicks; and would suggest the possible
recommendation strategies for marketing this product category.
EXPLORATORY STUDY
/LWHUDWXUH5HYLHZ
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
5/36
0(5%(+$9,28
572:$5'67+(38
5&+$6(2)+($/7+
)22''5,1.6_
biggest consumers of milk are in the age group of 6-16 years. The study also shows that 60 per cent
of the high income households are regular consumers of the beverage. These families on an average
consume about 30-40 gm of the product a day. Mothers are the key influencers in brand choice.Children also have a strong say in the brand selection. These beverages are usually added to warm
or cold milk. In addition to its use as a tasty and nutritious milk drink, some of the brands
(especially brown beverages) are also used as an additive in milk to make it a tasty snack drink in
institutional segments like restaurants, canteens, juice parlors.
A higher percentage of consumers prefer white beverages over brown beverages. White beverages
are used for their therapeutic benefits while brown beverages are used more for their taste.
0LON&RQVXPSWLRQ%HKDYLRXU
Since health food drinks are consumed mostly with milk, therefore
consumption behavior of milk can be extended to the consumption of
HFDs as well.
Both flavouring and packaging were found to be important factors in
consumption, especially amongst kids. A US based research has shown
that when it comes to milk, 85% of US children prefer any kind of
flavoured milk to the plain white milk. Chocolate was found to be a
leading flavour for milk in the flavoured milk category. While other
varieties such as strawberry, banana and vanilla were also available.1This consumption behaviour can be extended to Indian consumers
because of the widened impact of urbanization and globalization.
Milk intakes and habits with respect to milk consumption are found to vary with the sex of theperson according to a study published in Journal of American Dietetic Association. In a cross
sectional study amongst American adolescents it was found that milk intake was proportional to
the taste preference of the teenagers. Also attitude of personal health / nutrition was found to be an
important parameter. It was also found that consumption of milk was found to be significantly and
inversely related to fast food consumption.2Thus factors such as social income status, personal
attitude towards health and taste preferences are important influencers in milk consumption.
Considering these facts, promoting the health benefits and catering to the taste preferences of the
consumers becomes imperative for the health food drink manufacturers.
Beverages constitute a significant amount in the dietary intake of the children. Milk leads the
category of beverages consumed by children. With chocolate flavour being favoured by most of the
children, most of the health food drink manufacturers have launched the chocolate version of their
products Chocolate flavoured milk variants are the most popular variant in the flavoured milk
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
6/36
1680(5%(+$9
,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
category.3 This fact is also reflected in the strategy adopted by Horlicks with the launch of its ready-
to-drink version of Doodh in India.
&RQFOXVLRQIURP/LWHUDWXUH6XUYH\
Factors which might influence the purchase and consumption of HFDs as identified from the
literature survey are as follows:
Colour of the health food drink
Age of the consumer
Income of the family
Key Influencers in the purchase decision
Flavour
Packaging
Attitude towards personal health
3ULPDU\5HVHDUFKFocused Group Discussion technique was used to conduct a primary exploratory study to
determine the attributes people seek as a decision criteria for choosing a health drink. For this
purpose, two groups of five parents each were formulated.
Location:
AgriCo Colony, Jamshedpur
Adityapur, Jamshedpur
A freewheeling discussion on the attribute influencing the choice of Health Food Drinks was
encouraged. Based on the discussions, the following product attributes were identified as
influencing the purchase decisions of the customers:
Nourishment: The unhealthy food habits and modern lifestyle of todays youth is somewhat
affecting their proper growth and development. So people are looking for supplements
which can give them proper nutritional value and are beneficial for a healthy lifestyle.
Moreover increasing health awareness among parents and household incomes has
aggravated this trend. People are looking for health drinks which can provide sufficient
iron, calcium, vitamins A and D and vitamin C intake in daily dietary consumption.
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
7/36
0(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(38
5&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
colour is generally considered a utilitarian attribute which is seen as symbol of quality in
Indian markets.
Palatability: The HFDs basically target children and early youth as a potential consumer.
They are largely impulsive, fun loving and choosy towards products. So taste of a product
does play a significant role in this segment.
Economy: As HFD is a daily consumption product, people expect value for the money spent.
Moreover the middle class, a large potential buyer of health drinks is price sensitive and
hence prefers a value for money product.
Shelf-presence: Presence in the market or shelf-presence influences the purchase of the
HFD. People generally purchase the most visible product and in case of unavailability of a
brand the consumers do not delay their purchase decision. Moreover a larger shelf space
attracts innovators (youths) to buy them.
Packaging: The attractive packaging entices children, who are sometimes the key decision
makers behind a HFD purchase. The advertisement formulates the attitude of consumer. A
packaging design in sync with the advertisements will attract consumers by affecting theircognitive component. Moreover packaging can consider the after use of containers jars for
Indian markets. Historically attractive designs and packaging has boosted the sales of the
HFDs.
Brand Image: The brand is the trust between company and the consumer. A high utilitarian
value product category like HFD needs to have a trust among its customer base to sell its
value proposition. So a brand attached to high nutritional and health values will play an
immense role in the sale of HFD.
Promotions: The Indian market is price sensitive market wherein promotions increase the
sale of a product. Children also get attracted to promotional schemes like freebies of soft
toys etc. So Health drinks companies are frequently coming up with offers such as free
shakers, toys etc.
Granular/Powder: The granular and powdered form of HFDs is considered as a decisive
variable for their purchase in some cases.
Easy to Mix: The HFDs should easily mix up with the liquid. A HFD with low solubility
challenges the functionality of the core product.
(QYLURQPHQWDO,QIOXHQFHVLQWKHSXUFKDVHRI+)'
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
8/36
1680(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
Demographics
Income
Age
Education
Family
Role of influencer in family
Family size
Reference Groups
Of child
Of mother (decision maker)
Marketing Activities
Advertising
Promotion
'HFLVLRQPDNLQJSURFHVVDGRSWHGLQSXUFKDVHRI+)'
Limited Decision Making
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
9/360(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
Limited decision making involves recognizing a problem for which there are several possible
solutions. It then involves internal and limited external search, few alternatives, simple decision
rules on a few attributes and little post purchase evaluation unless there is a product problem. It
covers the middle ground between nominal and extended decision making.
In case of HFDs, there are many brands available in the market. While purchasing a HFD, we look
for few attributes based on our past experience and little external search like POS, any TV
advertisement or a word of mouth from some known person. The decision might just involve
evaluating the newness of the available alternative HFD; or might involve evaluating the actual or
anticipated behaviour of others.
DATA COLLECTION
,QVWUXPHQW8VHGA detailed questionnaire was made which measured the cognitive, affective and behavioral
components of the attitude of customers towards the purchase of HFD on a 5 point Likert scale.
Please refer Appendix 1 for the full questionnaire used for the process. A sample question is shown
below.
ProblemRecognition
Selective
Information Search
Limited Internal
Alternative Evaluation
Few Attributes
Simple Decision RulesFew Alternatives
Purchase
Postpurchase
No dissonance
Limited Evaluation
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
10/36
1680(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
0HWKRGRORJ\Data was collected using the following techniques:
Personal Interviews: With the mothers who are the
purchasers of HFD
Web based survey: Web link sent to our relatives and
colleagues.
Telephone based survey: Telephonic interviews were
conducted of our relatives and colleagues.
Via the above methods, we were able to collect 70 responses. The sampling method employed was
convenience based sampling. Next, we move to analyze the data collected above by using various
quantitative techniques in SPSS software.
DATA ANALYSIS
)DFWRU$QDO\VLVThis was undertaken to group the similar factors that drive a customer to purchase a HFD into
distinct heads. Factor analysis is a statistical method used to describe variability among observed
variables in terms of fewer unobserved variables called factors. The observed variables are
modeled as linear combinations of the factors, plus "error" terms. The information gained about the
interdependencies can be used later to reduce the set of variables in a dataset.
,QLWLDO&RQVLGHUDWLRQV
Sample Size: Correlation coefficients fluctuate from sample to sample, much more so in
small samples than in large. Therefore, the reliability of factor analysis is also dependent on
sample size. A sample size 5 times the number of variables is considered good. In our survey
there were 13 variables and we had a sample size of 70 parents.
Data Screening: The first thing to do when conducting a factor analysis is to look at the
inter-correlation between variables. If the test questions measure the same underlying
dimension (or dimensions) then we would expect them to correlate with each other
(because they are measuring the same thing). If there are variables that do not correlate
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
11/360(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .860
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 1.254E3
Df 276
Sig. .000
The KMO statistic varies between 0 and 1. A value of 0 indicates that the sum of partial correlationsis large relative to the sum of correlations, indicating diffusion in the pattern of correlations. A value
close to 1 indicates that the patterns of correlations are relatively compact and so factor analysis
should yield distinct and reliable factors. A value greater than .5 is recommended. Furthermore,
values between .5 and .7 are mediocre; values between .7 and .8 are good and above .9 are
considered superb. Since the test value is .860 which is very close to 1, we are confident that Factor
analysis will give good results.
Bartletts measure tests the null hypothesis that the original correlation matrix is an identity
matrix. For factor analysis to work there should be some relation between variables because if the
matrix were an identity matrix all correlation coefficients would be zero. If the test is significant, it
can be inferred that there are some relationships between the variables. For this, Bartletts test is
highly significant (p
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
12/361680(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
11 .291 2.235 98.291
12 .222 1.709 100.000
13 -
3.898E
-17
-2.998E-
16100.000
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
The above output lists the Eigen values associated with each linear factor before extraction, afterextraction and after rotation. Before extraction there were 13 linear components, the Eigen values
associated with each factor represent the variables explained by that particular linear component.
The first few factors explain relatively large variance whereas subsequent factors explain small
amount of variance. All the factors with Eigen values greater than 1 are extracted and we are left
with 4 factors. The Eigen values associated with them is again displayed in the columns labeled
Extraction Sums of Squared loading. The values are same as the values before extraction just that
the values for the discarded factors are ignored. In the final part of the table, the Eigen values of thefactors after rotation are displayed. Rotation has the effect of optimizing the factor structure and
one consequence for these data is that the relative importance of the four factors is equalized.
6FUHH3ORW
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
13/360(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
The above table shows the table of communality before and after extraction. Principal component
analysis works on the assumption that all variance is common; therefore before extraction the
communalities are all one. After extraction some of the factors are discarded and so some
information is lost. The amount of variance in each variable that can be explained by the retained
factors is represented by the communalities after extraction.
The component matrix contains the loadings of each variable onto each factor. The loadings lessthan .4 have been suppressed in the matrix and so there are blank spaces for many of the loadings.
This table is not relevant from the point of view of interpretation.
5RWDWHG&RPSRQHQW0DWUL[
The rotated component matrix is a matrix of the factor loadings for each variable onto each factor.
This matrix contains the same information as the component matrix above except that it is
calculated after rotation. There are several things to consider about the format of this matrix. First,
factor loadings less than 0.4 have not been displayed because we asked for these loadings to be
suppressed.
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
14/361680(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
&RQFOXVLRQ
From the Factor analysis we could come with four main factors, as can be seen from the table
above. We have named these factors on the basis of commonalities among the sub factors. In the
factor 1 we can see that all other sub factors are closer to product likeability except the attractive
packaging which is coming as an outlier in this group. All the four factors as identified are shown in
the table below:
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
15/360(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
&OXVWHU$QDO\VLVCluster Analysis is a technique used to assign a set of observations into subset as per similarity in
their behaviour. In the given consumer behaviour research each of the respondents had given
certain set of preference parameters while making their purchase decision. We use the cluster
analysis technique to group the customers into subsets who use similar type of factors into
consideration before buying the health food drink.
0HWKRGRORJ\
The 13 factors rated by the consumers had been clubbed as 4 dominant factors using factor analysis
as presented earlier. The factor scores of each respondent were then used to do cluster analysis on
available data.
+LHUDUFKLFDO&OXVWHU$QDO\VLV
We started with the hierarchical cluster analysis on the given data and used the Between-Groups
Linkage method to obtain the dendogram of sub-groups amongst the given set of respondents. The
measure used was Squared Euclidean Distance for interval. The 13 factors of the products were
Color of HFD
Chocolate flavor
Flavored milk preference
GranularityLikeability
SKU
Free Offer
Bottled packaging
Promotionsand packaging
Preferred Brand
Attitude towards healthy lifestyle
Top of the mind recall
Brandperception
PriceVisibility in shopPurchaseFeasibility
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
16/361680(5%(+$9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($
/7+)22''5,1.6_
After this we obtained the dendogram diagram for the given set of data which is reproduced from
the SPSS output below:
Dendograms start with individual cases and group the
most similar ones as one group. This process is continued
till an optimum centroid distance is obtained and clear
clusters emerge.
The image on the left is a screen shot of the dendogram
that we obtained as an output of the hierarchical cluster
analysis. The detailed dendogram is provided in the
Appendix 2 for reference.
In this dendogram it is evident that at the 4th level of
differentiation, there are 4 dominant clusters which could
b l d f h i d W hi
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
17/360(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
.0HDQV&OXVWHU$QDO\VLVThe hierarchical cluster analysis was followed by the K- means cluster analysis to get quick cluster
results. Care was taken to group each case by membership for further data mining. To start with we
entered Number of clusters as 6 to obtain the set of clusters. The same is being represented below:
However with no of clusters as 6 we obtained clusters where there was just 1 case in a cluster.
Hence we iterated the process with number of clusters equal to 5. This also did not yield the correct
results. Finally with number of clusters given as 4 we obtained a fair segmentation of the available
data. The same is shown below in the table which is the output from SPSS file:
Number of Cases in each Cluster
Cluster 1 26.000
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
18/361680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
The final cluster centers table that was obtained is as below. This table was further used for theinterpretation of clusters and identifying their membership traits.
Final Cluster Centers
Cluster
1 2 3 4
Health_attitude 4.19 3.67 4.42 4.58
Colour_of_HFD 3.77 3.28 3.17 2.00
Chocolate_flavour 3.88 3.00 4.33 2.92
Preference_for_flavoured_mi
lk4.19 3.11 4.33 2.92
Price 2.46 3.44 2.50 1.50
Visibility_in_shop 3.35 2.89 2.33 1.58Bottled 4.08 2.67 2.67 3.75
SKU_Size 4.27 3.61 1.83 2.42
Attractive_packaging 3.54 3.11 4.33 1.67
Preferred_brand 4.04 3.89 4.00 3.75
Free_offer 4.27 3.61 1.83 2.42
Top_of_mind_recall 3.58 3.11 2.58 3.25
Granularity 4.08 2.94 3.25 1.58
,QWHUSUHWDWLRQ
The above table is obtained on a scale of 5. We multiplied all the scores by 2, to take the scores on a
scale of 10, in order to get a better understanding of the scores, and a better comparison across the
various clusters and various attributes.
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
19/36
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
20/361680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6
_
*in the above table, the RED coloured scores denote the important attributes which influence the
purchase behaviour of the customer in each cluster.
The above table is then subjected for interpretation, to find out the most pertinent attributes in
each of the clusters. These attributes will define the clusters purchase behaviour for the HFDs.
In the interpretation, we consider the factor-loading scores of each attribute, and compare that
score with the corresponding scores in the other clusters, and also with the scores of the other
attributes in the same cluster. This comparison is required to understand the weight of the
attribute in the overall purchase decision of the HFDs by a particular cluster.
Considering some example based on the above table:
The scores for the Health Attitudeare high across all 4 clusters, and also the difference of
the scores is not much.
This gives us the interpretation that Health Attitude is considered to be an
important attribute in the purchase decision of a consumer for a HFD
In the Preference for flavoured milk, the scores of Cluster 1 and 3 are very near to each
other, and are much higher than the scores of cluster 2 and 4. Also the scores are very high
3ULFH
9LVLELOLW\LQVKRS
%RWWOHG
6.86L]H
$WWUDFWLYHSDFNDJLQJ
3UHIHUUHGEUDQG
)UHHRIIHU
7RSRIPLQGUHFDOO
*UDQXODULW\
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
21/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
This shows that Top of mind recall is not considered to be an important attribute in
the purchase decision of HFDs by any of the clusters.
&RQFOXVLRQ
Continuing on the same lines, and comparing the scores of the attributes across all the clusters and
all the attributes, we can see that the following attributes are important in the purchase decision of
the HFDs by each cluster:
Cluster 1
Health attitude
Colour of HFD
Chocolate flavour
Preference for f lavoured milk
Bottled
SKU Size
Preferred brand
Free offer
Granularity
Cluster 2
Health attitude
Price
SKU Size
Preferred brand
Free offer
Cluster 3
Health attitude
Chocolate flavour
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
22/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6
_
Preferred brand
Based on the above found attributes, we can name the 4 clusters as:
Cluster1 Value Seeker
These customer look out for complete value from a brand of HFD which they purchase, and
consider almost all of the attributes which we identified in our studies, for their purchase
decision
Cluster2 Price Conscious
These customers considers price to be a very important attribute in their purchasebehaviour, and want to have the best buy for the HFD, and also give preference for any free
offer available with any brand of HFD
Cluster3 PalatabilitySeeker
This cluster of customers considers the taste of the HFD and the packaging of the HFD to be
an important factor in their purchase decision.
Cluster4 Nutrition Seeker
These customers only buy HFD because of the nutrition which the HFDs provide in the
growth of their child. They have their preferred brand of HFD and are aware of what all
nutrition is being provided by the HFDs.
77HVW
The sources of information influencing the purchase decision are:
TV Advertisement
Children
Referral group
Internet
Print Advertisement
The respondents were asked to rank the factors in order of importance. A t-test was conducted on
the results of the survey in order to compare the means of the ranks for the factors. This was done
on all the 4 clusters identified above in the cluster analysis.
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
23/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
Reference
groups26 2.5385 1.02882 .20177
TV
Advertisement26 2.0000 1.20000 .23534
Internet 26 3.9231 1.35420 .26558
Advertisement26 3.5385 1.24035 .24325
Child 26 2.9231 1.38342 .27131
([KLELW&OXVWHU
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Reference
groups18 3.0556 1.34917 .31800
TV
Advertisement18 2.4444 1.50381 .35445
Internet 18 3.4444 1.61690 .38111
Advertisement18 3.3333 1.23669 .29149
Child 18 2.7778 1.30859 .30844
([KLELW&OXVWHU
One-Sample Statistics
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
24/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6
_
TV
Advertisement12 1.9167 1.16450 .33616
Internet 12 3.7500 1.42223 .41056
Advertisement12 3.9167 1.08362 .31282
Child 12 2.8333 1.40346 .40514
([KLELW&OXVWHU
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Reference
groups 12 2.6667 1.72328 .49747
TV
Advertisement12 1.8333 .83485 .24100
Internet 12 3.0833 1.56428 .45157
Advertisement12 3.2500 .86603 .25000
Child 12 4.1667 .93744 .27061
([KLELW&OXVWHU
We can say from the results that there is a significant difference between the ranks of the factors
with a 95% confidence.
&RQFOXVLRQ
The two most important factors that emerge out of the tests are:
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
25/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
This finding is an important implication for product placement as the marketer can target the
relevant source information for communicating with the customers in the respective clusters.
POSITIONING STRATEGIES
&XUUHQW3RVLWLRQLQJ%RXUQYLWDCadburys Bournvita is the market leader in the Brown HFD market with a share
of 18%. It has changed its positioning many a times from the time it was launched
way back in 1948. Its journey in terms of positioning is shown below:
Appendix 3 shows the print advertisements of Bournvita in current scenario.
&XUUHQW 3RVLWLRQLQJ +RUOLFNV
1948 Combination ofHealth & Taste
1970s
Helps in good upbringing
Tagline: Goodness that grows with you
1980s
Move from Upbringing to Intelligence
Tagline: Brought up right, Bournvita Bright
1990s
Focus onMind and Body
Tan ki Shakthi, Man ki Shakthi
1998
Focus on Health & Taste
RDA Formula: 2 cups of Bournvita, No Bournvita, Nomilk
Post2000
Focus onConfidence
Do you have the Bournvita Confidence?
2009
Science, Nature and Bournvita
Bournvita ++
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
26/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+
(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6
_
has now focused on children and started its famous Apang Opang Japangcampaign which has
become quite a hit amongst the children. It further strengthened its position in the minds of the
consumer by coming up with campaigns like N
ow proven-T
aller,S
tronger,S
harper.
Appendix 4 shows the print advertisements of Horlicks in current scenario.
3HUFHSWXDO0DSA perceptual map is a visual representation of how target consumers view the competing
alternatives in a Euclidean space which represents the market.
In order to develop the perceptual map, the questionnaire survey captured the brand of health fooddrink being usually used by the consumers. Question asked in the questionnaire: Which health
food drinkdo you usually use in the family? Thus against every respondent who had given his
choices for the various purchase factors we have his mostly used brand. This data along with the
ratings of the underlying purchase factors were fed as input to SPSS and Factor Analysis through
Principal Component Extraction was carried out. Based on the factor scores for the identified
factors viz, Likeability, Packaging & Promotions, Purchase Feasibility and Brand Perception,
perception for the brands was formulated by assigning relative weights based on the average
scores.
The average factor scores are calculated for the respondents of same brand. The same is
represented below in the tables:
Used Brand Likeability Packaging &
Promotion
Purchase
Feasibility
Brand Perception
Boost 0.442181 0.777112 0.056683 -0.36352
Bournvita 0.636334 -0.10239 0.149687 0.149345
Complan -0.4891 -0.771 -0.24864 -0.12282
Horlicks -0.75397 0.232525 -0.11274 -0.05191
The ideal self that should be represented for the market was calculated by taking an overall average
of the factor scores as given by all the respondents. This data was further filtered to keep average
factor scores for ideal market self and the two leading brands Bournvita and Horlicks. The same is
tabulated below:
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
27/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
Horlicks -0.75397 0.232525 -0.11274 -0.05191
The average scores were then plotted on the graph to arrive at the perceptual map:
,QWHUSUHWDWLRQ
0DUNHW,GHDO
The market ideal was calculated from the average response of all respondents. The perception mapfor the market ideal comes across as symmetric on all four factors with slight positive skewness for
packaging and promotion.
%RXUQYLWD
Bournvita clearly comes across as the winner on all fronts as per the market ideal parameters. It is
evident that the consumers using Bournvita consider likeability, brand perception and purchase
feasibility as the drivers behind their purchase.
Bournvita lacks the market ideal on the packaging and the promotion front but scores very high on
the likeability factors such as chocolate flavour, granularity, and preference for flavoured milk.
Similarly for consumers who indicated brand image as the main purchase driver found Bournvita to
be high on factors such as nutritional value providing overall better health quality and higher brand
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.20
0.20.40.60.8Likeability
Packaging &Promotion
PurchaseFeasibility
Brand Perception
Total (Ideal)
Bournvita
Horlicks
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
28/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+(
$/7+)22''5,1.6
_
market ideal on the packaging and promotion fronts i.e. launching attractive schemes, convenient
SKUs and colourful jars. However Horlicks needs to improve its perceived image on the palatability
front.
5HFRPPHQGHG)RFXV$UHDV
%RXUQYLWD
Focus on Product packaging and Promotion
Launch smaller sized SKUs
Provide freebies, gifts etc. with your product
+RUOLFNV
Possible changes in the colour of the product
Launch new flavours so as to increase customer likeability
CONCLUSION
It is highly imperative that marketers understand the purchase behaviour of the consumers so as to
focus on the prominent factors that consumers keep in mind while purchasing their product. The
project has clearly identified the answers of the questions it intended to find. To summarize the
same:
What are the prominent factors that drive a customer to purchase a HFD?
Likeability
Packaging & Promotion
Purchase feasibility
Brand perception
What are the various customer segments that buy a HFD?
Value Seeker
Price Conscious
Palatability seeker
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
29/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
Children
APPENDIX 1
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
30/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+(
$/7+)22''5,1.6
_
Reference Group ____________________
TV Ads ____________________
Internet ____________________
Print Ad ____________________
Child ____________________
e) Which health food drink do you use in your family? ________________________
Please Tick on the option that best reflects your choice:
1. My general attitude towards health affects my buying behaviour of HFD
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree2. I tend to buy Brown HFD over White HFD
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
3. My child prefers drinking chocolate flavoured HFD over non-chocolate flavoured HFD
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
4. My child prefers flavoured milk over plain milk
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
5. I consider price as a consideration while buying a HFD
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
31/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(3
85&+$6(2)+($/7
+)22''5,1.6_
6. I prefer buying my brand of HFD even if it is not so visibly present in the shelf of the shop
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
7. I prefer buying a bottled HFD over a non-bottled pack HFD
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
8. I buy smaller packs of HFD over the larger packs HFD
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree9. My child influences me to buy an attractive looking HFD (colour, shape)
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
10.I always buy my preferred brand of HFDStrongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
11.I usually buy a HFD which come with freebies
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
12 I buy a HFD whose advertisement I remember at the time of purchase
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
32/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+(
$/7+)22''5,1.6
_
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
33/36
0(5%(+$9,2
8572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+($/7+)22''5,1.6_
Dendrogram using Average Linkage (Between Groups)
Rescaled Distance Cluster Combine
C A S E 0 5 10 15 20 25Label Num +---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+
55 65 43 32 39 46 42
37 56 66 54 22 36 41 45 50 60 34
33 44 47 38 48 21 13 15 9 12
40 31 3 14 10 24 7 1 27 29 8
11 4 26 16 17 18 51
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
34/36
1680(5%(+$
9,28572:$5'67+(385&+$6(2)+(
$/7+)22''5,1.6
_
53 63 19 52
62 58 68 57 67 49 59
20
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
35/36
678'
8/14/2019 Cnb Final Report
36/36
_