+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Communities and standards

Communities and standards

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: doli
View: 20 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Communities and standards. Hugo Besemer “Bircim.net”. Two cultures?. Snow’s world (1959) Literary intellectuals Scientists. In our little world Knowledge managers Techies. Exchange standards as a community process. Communities like (I)DML - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
23
Communities and standards Hugo Besemer “Bircim.net”
Transcript
Page 1: Communities and standards

Communities and standards

Hugo Besemer“Bircim.net”

Page 2: Communities and standards

Two cultures?

Snow’s world (1959)

Literary intellectuals

Scientists

In our little world

Knowledge managers

Techies

Page 3: Communities and standards

Exchange standards as a community process

Communities like

• (I)DML• The Agricultural sector

(Agstandards / AgMES / AOS / AgCo)

• Open Knowledge Network (OKN)

Page 4: Communities and standards

IDML = International Development Markup Languange

• Started 1998 • Purpose: investigate use of XML in

development community<html>

<body>

<h1>Education project>

<p><b>Angola</b>

<p>Worldbank<br>

USAID

</body>

</html>

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>

<project>

<project_title>Education project</project_title>

<country>Angola</country>

<donor>Worldbank</donor>

<donor>USAID</donor>

</project>

Page 5: Communities and standards

IDML - what happened

• E-community created• DTD for project information

By Bellanet, based on CEFDA• Face-to-face meetings• Proof of concept demos

Page 6: Communities and standards

“The proof of concept”

Page 7: Communities and standards

“laid the basis for AIDA

Varying sources => “who, what, where rather than aggregate statistics

Page 8: Communities and standards

IDML - problems

• Development community does not “own” a problemlike: how to encode mathematical or chemical formulae

• Initiatives attracted technofiles rather than information service managers

• e-discussion did not set an agenda• Unclear who owned the initiative

Page 9: Communities and standards

IDML - results

• Increased awareness of opportunities

• Catalyst for other initiatives (AIDA, Eland)

• mailing list kept growing

Page 10: Communities and standards

What IDML did not achieve

• Create a home for standards in the community

• Go beyond markup (vocabularies, services)

Page 11: Communities and standards

Initiatives in the agricultural sector

(Agstandards, AgMES, AOS, AgCo)

• Started in 2000when everybody was aware XML would come…

• Only service managers invited• A number of general standards

were arising (e.g. Dublin Core)So what can a community do?

Page 12: Communities and standards

AgMES (Agricultural metadata set)

Page 13: Communities and standards

AgMES: namespaces and application profiles

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><agrisResources>

<agrisResource arn="XF2003000001"><dc:title xml:lang="eng">The Agricultural Metadata Element Set

Project (AgMES) </dc:title><dc:title xml:lang="eng">

<dcterms:alternative xml:lang="eng">AgMES</dcterms:alternative>

<dcterms:alternative xml:lang="eng">Project AgMES</dcterms:alternative>

</dc:title><ags:creator>

<ags:creatorCorporate>FAO, Rome (Italy). Library and Documentation Systems Div. </ags:creatorCorporate>

</ags:creator>

Page 14: Communities and standards

Need to map vocabularies:

Agricultual Ontology Service

Page 15: Communities and standards

What was different than IDML, and did it work in the Ag community?

• Real stakeholders (server owners) got involved

• One organisation felt responsible for process

• Communities have been formed• Vocabulary issues have been addressed

but…• It is only a first step• Standards do not have a “home”

Page 16: Communities and standards

AgCo = Coherence in International Agricultural Information Systems

• June 2003 (on invitation from DfID)• Trail: coherence donor

interventions• Trail: collaboration and exchange

between services

Page 17: Communities and standards

AgCo: services trail

• Clearinghouse for vocabularies• Clearinghouse for markup• Several services wanted to

investigate WebservicesSOAP => envelopes for exchanges between systemsWSDL = Webservices Definition LanguageUDDI => registry of trusted services (clearinghouse!)

Page 18: Communities and standards

OKN = Open Knowledge Network

• Local content creation at public access points in the South

• Extension of WWW where there is no permanent connection

• Driven by meta-data and standards• Standards not created by community• Standards create conditions for

community

Page 19: Communities and standards

OKN meta-data

• Standardisation on different levels than IDML / AgCoShould there be okn:// instead of http://

• Important to know where meta-data comes from =>

• RDF = Resource Description FrameworkTriplets of Resource => Propertytype =>Property

Page 20: Communities and standards

Example OKN Metadata Expressed in RDF

<?xml version="1.0"?><!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [<!ENTITY okn 'http://openknowledge.net/2003/06/'>]>

<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:okn="http://openknowledge.net/2003/06/core#" xmlns:ags="http://www.fao.org/agris/agmes">

<rdf:Description rdf:about="okn:hub.accesspoint1.guid.herbal_sprain.xml">

<ags:personalAuthor>R. Mangalakshmi</ags:personalAuthor>

<okn:reporter>J. Mangalakshmi</okn:reporter><okn:rating rdf:resource="&okn;ratingTypes#good"/><okn:type rdf:resource="&okn;types#"/><okn:statusTypes

rdf:resource="&okn;statusTypes#published"/><okn:rights

rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0"/><dc:title xml:lang="en">Herbal treatment for

sprain</dc:title>

Page 21: Communities and standards

<dc:title xml:lang="ta">kshkljsh kljhdkjds ljhsds</dc:title><dc:language>tam</dc:language><dc:subject rdf:resource="&okn;lexicon#treatment"/>

<dc:subject rdf:resource="&okn;lexicon#sprain"/><dcterms:abstract>An indigenous treatment from a traditional

healer in Pondicherry in South India, for sprain on any part of the body, using a widely available plant called, Erukkan chedi</dcterms:abstract>

<dcterms:spatial rdf:resource="&okn;spatial#all"/><dcterms:isVersionOf

rdf:resource="okn:hub.accesspoint1.guid.herbal_sprain_a1.xml"/><dcterms:issued>2002-02-21T12:00:00+01:00</

dcterms:issued><dcterms:dateSubmitted>2002-02-21T12:00:00+01:00</

dcterms:dateSubmitted><dcterms:modified>2002-02-22T12:00:00+01:00</

dcterms:modified><dcterms:valid>2002-02-28T12:00:00+01:00</dcterms:valid><dcterms:medium>text/xml</dcterms:medium><dcterms:extent>1000</dcterms:extent><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#fishermen"/><dcterms:audience

Page 22: Communities and standards

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#farmers"/><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#parents"/><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#houseHolders"/><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#citizens"/><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#women"/><dcterms:audience

rdf:resource="&okn;audienceTypes#men"/></rdf:Description>

</rdf:RDF>

Page 23: Communities and standards

General remarks

• These are supply driven processesThey create conditions for new demand-driven services

• These are technology-driven processes• Spontaneous (e)-communities are not

good at institutional tasks• Standards do not develop easily in a

vacuum, better in a co-operative service


Recommended