+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comparisons of Scintillating Fiber, Diamond Particle Detector and Beam Current Transformer T. Tsang...

Comparisons of Scintillating Fiber, Diamond Particle Detector and Beam Current Transformer T. Tsang...

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
10
Comparisons of Scintillating Fiber, Diamond Particle Detector and Beam Current Transformer T. Tsang BNL (Nov 24, 2009)
Transcript

Comparisons of Scintillating Fiber, Diamond Particle Detector

and Beam Current TransformerT. Tsang

BNL(Nov 24, 2009)

Scintillating fiber channel #0

2 meter long, BCF-20, 1-mm diameterblue emitting scintillating fiber

12 meter long, 1-mm diameterBFH37-1000 fiber, blue T=0.77

Avalanche photodiode

һγ

plastic scintillating fiberSaint-Gobain BCF-201/e length >3.5 meterfluorescence decay time ~ 2.5 ns~8000 photons/Mev

Feb. 6, 2008

scintillating fiber

typical signal traceshot # 17020

8 bunches6 TP

Diamond particle detector

Shot # 17017 Shot # 17006

typical diamond detector signal trace

from Marcus Palm

Nov. 11, 2007, 17000 series dataRed: x, diamond particle detector signal @ left 20o Black: y, scintillator detector signal

0.94

0.90

0.87

0.47

0.93

0.56

0.83

0.97

0.95

0.89

0.95

0.92

Nov 4 2009Correlation of Scintillator & Diamond Particle detector signalcalculated correlation

of peak height(data smoothed with 3 or 5 pts)

nanosecond

P&S

typical transformer signal tracetransformer.zip – higher resolution dataRawTransformerData.tgz – lower resolution data

Beam current transformer summary.xls appear to be a file for adjusting the baseline shift

Nov. 11, 2007, 17000 series data

Red: x, diamond particle detector signal @ left 20o Black: y, scintillator detector signalBlue: z, current transformer signal

Nov 13 2009Correlation of Scintillator & Diamond Detector & Current Transformer Signalscalculated correlation

of peak height(data smoothed with 3 or 5 pts)

nanosecond0.92

0.88

P&S P&T

0.95

0.93

0.89

0.89

0.95

0.95

0.97

0.92

0.83

0.81

0.56

0.53

0.47

0.24

0.87

0.74

0.90

0.88

0.94

0.93

0.93

0.78

Probe

Nov. 11, 2007, 17000 series data

Red: x, diamond particle detector signal @ left 20o Black: y, scintillator detector signalBlue: z, current transformer signal

0.063

0.95

0.88

Nov 18 2009Correlation of Scintillator & diamond Particle & current Transformer signalpump-probe studies

calculated correlation of peak height

(data smoothed with 3 or 5 pts)

P&S P&TPump

nanosecond

0.39

0.92

0.87 0.92

-500 V

-

+

GND

pCVD

100

nF

1 kΩ

1 M

Ω

50 Ω

ter

m.

on o

scill

osco

pe

0 Ω

0 Ω

Marcus Palm’s diagram

Actual diagram

back

front

0.5x7.5x7.5 mm3

Au padding 0.5 µm thick

Details of diamond particle detectorNov. 6, 2009

From MPalm_AB_note.pdf

guard ring

electrode

Response of diamond particle detector usingα injection 241Am @ 5.5 MeV241Am place in the front – hole draft induced 241Am place in the back - electron drift induced

Nov. 6, 2009

0.5 mm thick pCVDElectron saturation velocity: 2.3 x 105 m/s → 2.2 ns pulse responseHole saturation velocity: 1 x 105 m/s → 5.0 ns pulse responsecontradicting our result here !

Response of diamond particle detector using 193 nm ArF laser

laser illumination location

Response of diamond particle detector using x-ray injection @ NSLS-X15A (19 keV)

Nov. 19, 2009

NSLS parametersBunch frequency: 52.88 MHzBunch spacing: ~19 nsBunch length: 287 psx-ray beam size: 0.2x0.2 mm2

Measured resultsTransmittance of Au pad: 0.92Absorption of diamond: 0.0672Typical photocurrent (ave): ~nADiamond responsitivity: 0.00464 A/W

detector response map

x-ray injection

diamond detector response

drooping ?

To be examined on other (more intense) x-ray beamlinesthe drooping effect of diamond detector, if any

x-ray injected on the back

response is fairly uniform

No drooping ?


Recommended