Compliance ForumEvolution de la fonction compliance au travers des développements de la réglementation et du marché
Evolutie van de compliance functie door de reglementaire en marktontwikkelingen
7 June 2016
PwC
7 June 2016
Introduction 3
1 A function facing key evolutions 4
Regulatory-driven evolution 5
2 A look back 6
3 The control functions 9
4 Increasing expectations 11
5 Reporting lines 14
6 Resources 18
7 Risk management 21
Future perspectives 27
8 Top areas of compliance-related risks 28
9 Market-driven changes 30
10 Compliance culture 32
11 Culture & strategy 36
Conclusion 40
Contents
2Compliance Forum
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Introduction
3Compliance Forum
1
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
IntroductionA function facing key evolutions
4
It is important to be able to make a clearbusiness case for why compliance shouldstep up the value chain.
Compliance Officers are becoming increasingly important advisers to boards
Building a strong bank cultureas a form of risk reduction.
This more strategic role requires to rethinkthe approach to performance management,recruitment and career development.
50% of COs believe their teams aretoo small to carry out theirresponsibilities effectively.
PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016
Technology is critical in improving the speed, scope and accuracy of compliance monitoring, but also freeing up compliance to take on a more strategic role
Bank CEOs continue to see over-regulation as the by far biggestthreat to growth they face.
PwC 19th Annual Global CEO Survey
Compliance function is key to protect thebusiness from regulatory censure andprotect brand and reputation.
4Compliance Forum
1 A function facing key evolutions ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Regulatory-driven evolution
5Compliance Forum
2
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
10/05/2007
27/03/1995
06/04/1995
2 A look back
Regulatory-driven evolutionLooking back at the regulation – Insurance companies & Financial institutions
6Compliance Forum
Law on the supervision of insurance companies
09/07/1975
Law on organisinga national register of natural persons and the relevant implementing decrees
Law on consumer credit
Law on terrestrial insurance contracts: Compliance with the provisions on the protection of the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity
RD on consumer credit charges, rates, contract duration and repayment terms
Law on the protection of privacy in relation to the processing of personal data
Law on the prevention of the use of the financial system for laundering money and terrorism financing: Compliance with the due diligence obligation towards the clients, the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of laundering money and terrorism financing, and the prevention of the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
Law on insurance and reinsurance intermediation and on the distribution of insurance:(provisions on the protection of the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity, rules of conduct)
12/06/1991
08/08/1983
04/08/1992
25/06/1992
08/12/1992
11/01/1993
30/11/2001 (D. 207)
28/04/2003
14/11/2003
06/04/2010
The special mechanisms
Law on supplementary pensions:Compliance with the provisions on the protection of the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity
RD on life insurance activities: Compliance with the provisions on the protection of the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity
Law on combating certain forms of discrimination and the law on combating discrimination between men and women
19/10/2010
(CBFA 2010_22)
Compliance with the provisions on the protection of the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity
04/12/2012
(NBB_2012_14)
Compliance function
01/03/2011 (CBFA_2011_09)
Compliance with the due diligence obligation towards the clients, the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of laundering money and terrorism financing, and the prevention of the financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
InsuranceCompanies
FinancialInstitutions
Insurance Companies &Financial Institutions
Law on mortgage loans
02/08/2002
Law on the supervision of the financial sector and on financial services
26/11/2009
(CBFA_2009_34)
Compliance with the principles on sound remuneration policy
Law on market practices and consumer protection
17/06/2013
(NBB_2013_02)
Expertise and professional integrity – Fit & Proper
Law on the status and supervision of credit institutions:
The special mechanisms
22/03/1993
Law on the legal status and supervision of investment firms, rules governing the use of financial instruments
18/12/1997(D1 97/9 & D4 79/4)
The special mechanisms
30/12/1997(D1 97/10)
The fiscal prevention policy
22/03/2006
Law on intermediation in banking and investment services and the distribution of financial instruments:Compliance with the rules of conduct
05/06/2007
CBFA regulation on organisational requirements for institutions that provide investment services
20/07/2004
Law on certain forms of collective management of investment portfolios: Compliance with the rules on publicity
16/06/2006
Law concerning public offers of investment instruments: Compliance with the rules on publicity
14/02/2011(CBFA_2011_09)
Compliance with the principles on sound remuneration policy: overview of the relevant legal provisions
14/02/2011(CBFA_2011_05)
CBFA regulation on sound remuneration policies in credit institutions
25/04/2014
Law on the legal status and supervision of credit institutions
13/03/2016
Law on the legal status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance institutions
04/04/2014
Law on insurance
03/08/2012
Law concerning institutions for collective investments according to the conditions set out in Guideline 2009/65/EG and for debt investment institutions
18/12/2013
NBB_2013_20
18/12/2013
NBB_2013_20
30/12/2013
Law on market practices and consumer protection
Requirements with regard to the governance system in the context of preparatory measures for Solvency II
Recent developments concerning money laundering
07/12/2015
NBB_2015_29
Introduction of a governance manual for the banking sector
13/07/2015
NBB_2015_21
The internal control system and the internal audit function
Principle of the compliance function
18/12/2001(D1 2001/13)
Definition of the internal controlsfunction, the internalaudit and the compliance function
14/11/2002(D1/EB/2002/6)
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Fit & proper
Sound remuneration policy
Anti-discrimination
Intermediation: rules of conduct
Investment portfolios: rules on publicity
Supervision of the financial sector and financial services:- MiFID rules of conduct- Rules on market abuse- Honest, fair and professional
treatment of the stakeholders- Rules of publicity
Status and supervision of investment firms: asset protection
Status and supervision of credit institutions: special mechanisms
AML
Data privacy
2 A look back
Regulatory-driven evolutionLooking back at the regulation – Financial institutions
7Compliance Forum
92 93 94 95 … 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
Law of 8 December 1992
Law of 11 January 1993
Law of 22 March 1993
Law of 6 April 1995
Law of 2 August 2002
Law of 20 July 2004
Law of 22 March 2006
Law of 10 May 2007
Circular CBFA_2011_05 & CBFA_2011_09 of 14 February 2011
Circular NBB_2013_02 of 17 June 2013
14 15 16
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
2 A look back
Regulatory-driven evolutionLooking back at the regulation – Insurance companies
8Compliance Forum
91 92 93 94 95 … 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
Governance requirements Solvency II
AssurMiFID
Fit & proper
Market practices and consumer protection
Sound remuneration policy
Anti-discrimination
The supervision of the financial sector and financial services
The special mechanisms
Intermediation: rules of conduct
AML
Data privacy
Protection to the insurance taker, information to the client and publicity
Law of 25 June 1992
Law of 8 December 1992
Law of 11 January 1993
Law of 27 March 1995
Circular D. 207 of 30 November 2001
Law of 2 August 2002
Law of 10 May 2007
Circular CBFA_2009_34 of 26 November 2009
Law of 6 April 2010
Circular NBB_2013_02 of 17 June 2013
Circular NBB_2013_20 of 18 December 2013
14 15 16
Law of 30 July 2013
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
3 The control functions
Regulatory-driven evolutionThe controls functions
9Compliance Forum
ResponsibilitiesExecution
Internal AuditVerification of the effective functioning and of the efficiency of internal controls (including
compliance and risk functions).
ComplianceVerification of the effective application of the regulations and procedures ensuring the integrity of the service delivered.
Risk ManagementVerification that the procedures are
appropriate to mitigate the risks identified and monitoring of the various reporting.
BoardRegularly verifies the institution
benefits from an adequate internal control environment. Analyses the internal controls report provided
by the Executive Committee.
Executive CommitteeTakes all required measures to
ensure that the institution permanently benefits from an
adequate internal controls function. Analyses the results of
Internal Audit work.
Annual report
Annual report
OperationsEffective application of the procedures defined
to mitigate the risks identified.
1st line of defence
3rd line of defence
2nd line of defence
Legal ?
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
3 The control functions
Regulatory-driven evolutionThe controls functions
10Compliance Forum
Source: PwC State of Compliance 2015 Survey
Polling question 1
Do you feel the boundaries of first and second lines of defence are in practice well established and defined in your organisation?
1. Yes
2. No
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
4 Increasing expectations
Regulatory-driven evolutionIncreasing expectations
11Compliance Forum
Increased regulatory
scrutiny
Misconduct / Fines
Public sentiment
Financial crisis
The top 20 European banks have paid out about $125 billion in fines and lawsuits since the onset of the financial crisis2, as well as incurring significant reputational damage.
Financial Times, 23 August 2015
66% of the banking industry leaders taking part in PwC’s latest global CEO survey see lack of trust as a threat to growth.
19th Annual Global CEO Survey
The financial crisis is a stark reminder that transparency and disclosure are essential in today's marketplace..
US Senator Jack Red, 16 June 2009
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
4 Increasing expectations
Regulatory-driven evolutionIncreasing expectations
12Compliance Forum
Regulatory requirements
Inter-dependencies
Multicompe-tencies
Additional responsibilities
Inspections
PressurePRIIPS
MiFID
MAD/MAR
Etc
Administrative / penal
Reporting requirements
Trust
IT
Legal
Business
Staff
Sanctions
Mystery shopping
Sustainable?
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
4 Increasing expectations
Regulatory-driven evolutionIncreasing expectations
13Compliance Forum
• Local versus global regulation
The level of detail of the regulation varies from one jurisdiction to another
There are differences in the timing for regulation implementation
A lot depends on the level of interpretation of the supervising authority
• Greater involvement of the ECB
Pressure to increase sanctions for institutions not fulfilling regulatory requirements
Lack of direct relationship with the supervisory authorities
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
5 Reporting lines
Regulatory-driven evolutionReporting lines
14Compliance Forum
Who is your supervisor from a hierarchical perspective, from a functional perspective or in an ideal perspective?
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
60,00%
70,00%
CEO COO CRO Chairman ofthe Board
Group CO Legal Other
Hierarchical Functional Ideal
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
5 Reporting lines
Regulatory-driven evolutionReporting lines
15Compliance Forum
Source: PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
CEO
Others
CRO
Legal
Who is the direct reporting line of the Compliance Officer?
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
5 Reporting lines
Regulatory-driven evolutionReporting lines
16Compliance Forum
Polling question 2
How would you assess the Board of Directors receptiveness to Compliance matters?
1. High
2. Low
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
5 Reporting lines
Regulatory-driven evolutionReporting lines
17Compliance Forum
High 64%
How would you assess the Board of Directors receptiveness to Compliance matters?
Low 36%
Source: PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
61,54%
6 Resources
Regulatory-driven evolutionResources
18Compliance Forum
Do you think that your department has sufficient staff for the following missions?
38,46%
46,15%
AML
MiFID
Market abuse
Privacy
Rules on advertising
0% 100%
Yes No
53,85%
61,54% 38,46%
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
61,54%38,46%
61,54% 38,46%
PwC
7 June 2016
21,43%
6 Resources
Regulatory-driven evolutionResources
19Compliance Forum
Do you think that you benefit from sufficient automated monitoring tools for the following missions?
78,57%
35,71%
AML
MiFID
Market abuse
Public offer
0% 100%
Yes No
64,29%
35,71% 64,29%
35,71% 64,29%
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
6 Resources
Regulatory-driven evolutionResources
20Compliance Forum
How do you consider the level of available resources assigned to the Compliance?
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Suitable Sufficient Insufficient
29%21%
50% 93% (increase of 14%) of Compliance Officers expect that compliance staff will increase in the next 2 years.
PwC Banking compliance Survey 2016
Source: PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
21Compliance Forum
Polling question 3
Given the increase in risk due to these trends, are you of the opinion that there should be a clear and direct link between the Chief Compliance Officer and risk management?
1. Yes
2. No
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
22Compliance Forum
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
Strengthening of the regulatory framework.
Increasing pressure from authority for compliance.
Record fines have been imposed to financial institutions
Compliance issues could be considered as a risk category
There are areas of overlap between risk and compliance
Non-compliance is a risk….
Chief Risk Officers must understand the risk of non-compliance and assess the consequences for the firm as compliance is now part of the risk management framework.
…but Compliance remains mainly independent.
79% of participants to the PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016 say that compliance is now a standalone function and none plan to merge it with other functions if it is currently separate.
Risk managers are trying to understand compliance issues not because they want to run compliance, but they want to understand what risks they’re taking.
Rodney Nelsestuen, senior research director at the CEB TowerGroup
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
23Compliance Forum
Polling question 4
Does the Compliance function use a dedicated Governance, Risk management and Compliance (GRC) technology tool (e.g. not a learning management or training tool)?
1. Yes
2. No
3. Don’t know
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
24Compliance Forum
23%
51%
26%
Does the Compliance function use a dedicated GRC technology tool?
Yes No Don't know
Source: PwC State of Compliance 2015 Survey
79% of Compliance Officers consider that additional tools should be deployed.
PwC Banking compliance Survey 2016
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
• A GRC tool is a very strong asset for
• However, some key attention points must be considered:
Documentation and reporting of the risk management and compliance activities
Performance of self-assessments and remediation of the processes / procedures
Balance the interests of the business and the compliance risks.
It is just a tool and not an objective
The GRC tools are often more sophisticated than the organisation
It requires a lot of work beforehand
It must be embedded in all the processes of the organisation
It must be part of all the future projects, developments or initiatives
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
25Compliance Forum
Polling question 5
Who “owns” the GRC technology tool used by your Compliance function?
1. Internal Audit
2. Risk Management
3. Compliance
4. No use of a GRC technology tool
5. Don’t know
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
7 Risk management
26Compliance Forum
Source: PwC State of Compliance 2015 Survey
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Corporate Compliance function
Risk Management
Other
Internal Audit
Don't know
Who "owns" the GRC technology tool used by your Compliance function?
Regulatory-driven evolutionRisk management
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Future perspectives
27Compliance Forum
3
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
8 Top areas of compliance-related risks
Future perspectivesTop areas of compliance-related risks
28Compliance Forum
Polling question 6
What do you think will be the key compliance risks in the next 2 years?
1. AML & CFT
2. Banking secrecy & data privacy
3. Conflicts of interest
4. Consumer protection
5. Customer litigation
6. Future changes in regulation
7. Inconsistent implementation of regulation across business
lines and geographies
8. Internal organizational issues
9. KYC
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
8 Top areas of compliance-related risks
Future perspectivesTop areas of compliance-related risks
29Compliance Forum
What do you think will be the key compliance risks in the next 2 years?
Compliance risks in 2 years
80% Consumer protection
60% KYC
60% AML & CFT
30% Banking secrecy & data privacy
20% Customer litigation
20% Conflicts of interest
10% Future changes in regulation
10%Inconsistent implementation of regulation across business lines
0% Internal organizational issues
Source: PwC Banking Compliance Survey 2016
Current main compliance risks
KYC 70%
Consumer protection 60%
AML & CFT 60%
Future changes in regulation 40%
Inconsistent implementation of regulation across business lines
20%
Conflicts of interest 20%
Customer litigation 10%
Banking secrecy & data privacy 10%
Internal organizational issues 10%
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
9 Market-driven changes
Future perspectivesMarket-driven changes
30Compliance Forum
• Big data,
• Data analytics
• Data security
• In-Memory Database
• Technological breakthroughs
• New payment solution
• Mobile banking
• Personal finance management tools
• Multi-Tenant Cloud Applications
Mainly for insurance companies
• Climate change should result in an increase of the natural disasters
• Development of a demand for new insurance coverage
• Need for new risk modelling and insurance coverage compliant with existing and future regulation
• Increase the level of risk (legal, financial and reputational)
• Lack of maturity of the internal controls functions and more specifically the compliance
• Lack of experience of Belgian institution in exotic regulations
• Globalised economy and increase of non-resident customers
• Increase of international mobility
• Development of new b2b clients (e.g. new type of entities active in payment services)
There are a number of market trends impacting the compliance
function
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
9 Market-driven changes
Future perspectivesMarket-driven changes
31Compliance Forum
Polling question 7
What trend do you believe will be the greatest market driver for change in compliance risk management over the next 10 years?
1. Data
2. Technology
3. Emerging markets
4. New customers
5. Natural disasters
6. Other
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
10 Compliance culture
Future perspectivesCompliance culture
32Compliance Forum
Polling question 8
Overall, to what extent would you agree or disagree that the value of compliance is fully embraced across your organisation?
1. Strongly agree
2. Agree
3. Neither agree nor disagree
4. Disagree
5. Strongly disagree
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
10 Compliance culture
Future perspectivesCompliance culture
33Compliance Forum
Source: PwC State of Compliance 2015 Survey
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Strongly agree
Agree
Neither agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Overall, to what extent would you agree or disagree that the value of compliance is fully embraced across your organisation?
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
10 Compliance culture
Future perspectivesCompliance culture
34Compliance Forum
Source: Thomson Reuter Accelus: Conduct Risk Report 2014/15
54% of Compliance Officers believe they should be focusing more on the development of a compliance culture in the business.
PwC Banking compliance Survey 2016
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
10 Compliance culture
Future perspectives Compliance culture
35Compliance Forum
“Weaknesses in risk culture are often considered a root cause of the global financial crisis, headline risk and compliance events.”
Sources: FSB “Guidance on Supervisory Interaction with Financial Institutions on Risk Culture” and G30 “Banking
Conduct and Culture – A Call for Sustained and Comprehensive Reform”
“Poor cultural foundations and significant cultural failures were major drivers of the recent financial crisis, and continue to be factors in the scandals since then, exacerbated by staff with questionable conduct and values who move from bank to bank with impunity.”
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
11 Culture & strategy
Future perspectives Culture & strategy
36Compliance Forum
Polling question 9
Are you of the opinion that the Chief Compliance Officer should be more involved in strategic decision-making in the future?
1. Yes
2. No
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
11 Culture & strategy
Future perspectives Culture & strategy
37Compliance Forum
Source: PwC State of Compliance 2015 Survey
Polling question 10
Are you of the opinion that involvement in the setting of the corporate strategy would pose issues for the independence around the Chief Compliance Officer?
1. Yes
2. No
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
11 Culture & strategy
Future perspectives Culture & strategy
38Compliance Forum
Building a strong bank culture can be thought of as a form of risk reduction. With a weak culture comes high governance risk, but with a strong culture comes lower governance risk.
Banking conduct and culture: A call for sustained
and comprehensive reform, Group of 30, 2015
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Capabilities and effectiveness contributing to the strategy
11 Culture & strategy
Future perspectives Culture & strategy
39Compliance Forum
Expanded skill set and experience within the Compliance function through multi-disciplinary teams (e.g.: data analysis experience, technology acumen, business operations experience, industry experience, …)
Increased knowledge in managing all compliance obligations and issues through regular discussions with the sector and the regulators
Proactivity progressively replacing reactivity:
Risk identification and assessment – integrated risk assessments
Compliance monitoring and testing
Technology solutions
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
Conclusion
40Compliance Forum
4
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
PwC
7 June 2016
ConclusionFuture components of a well-balanced Compliance function?
41Compliance Forum
8 principles to strengthen the Compliance function
and be prepared for future challenges.
Close relationships with key business leaders through the company.
01 Efficiency initiatives to improve the effectiveness of the compliance function.
02
Development and recognition of the strategic value delivered by compliance.
04
Multi-disciplinarity of the skills of the compliance officers, especially in technology and data analytics.
07
Efficient and close cooperation with Risk Management.
05
Building up on and balancing resiliency and agility to help driving growth.
08
Redefinition/ confirmation of the scope and role of compliance across the organisation.
03
Implementation of automated monitoring tools and use of integrated GRC platforms.
06
ConclusionFuture perspectivesRegulatory-driven evolutionIntroductionContents
© 2016 PwC Belgium. All rights reserved.
PwC firms help organisations and individuals create the value they’re looking for. We’re a network of firms in 157 countries with close to 195,433 people who are committed to delivering quality in assurance, tax and advisory services. Tell us what matters to you and find out more by visiting us at www.pwc.comPwC refers to the PwC network and/or one or more of its member firms, each of which is a separate legal entity.
Please see www.pwc.com/structure for further details.