+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Compressor Performance Assessment - Mach10The compressor vendor advised that the compressor would...

Compressor Performance Assessment - Mach10The compressor vendor advised that the compressor would...

Date post: 10-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
2
Location: North Sea Year: 2016 Duration: 2 months COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND DEBOTTLENECKING A UK upstream operator with assets in the North Sea was concerned about the performance degradaƟon of one of its Gas LiŌ Compressor and about the capability of the machine to contribute to the plaƞorm’s oil producƟon. MACH10 has been asked to review the actual compressor thermodynamic performance and assess whether the machine is t for purpose unƟl the planned end of producƟon in 2018. The 1x100% compressor is composed by two stages driven by a xedspeed electric motor. The pressure delivered by the compressor was 1 bar above the minimum required pressure to sustain the oil producƟon. The compressor vendor advised that the compressor would have been untforpurpose in less than 6 months due to the ongoing performance degradaƟon. The vendor’s advice was to replace the enƟre compressor internal bundles (rotors and diaphragms). www.mach10ltd.com Last Update: December 2016
Transcript

Location: North Sea

Year: 2016

Duration: 2 months

COMPRESSOR PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND DEBOTTLENECKING

A UK upstream operator with assets in the North Sea was concerned

about the performance degrada on of one of its Gas Li Compressor

and about the capability of the machine to contribute to

the pla orm’s oil produc on. MACH10 has been asked to review the

actual compressor thermodynamic performance and assess whether

the machine is fit for purpose un l the planned end of produc on in

2018.

The 1x100% compressor is composed by two stages driven by a

fixed‐speed electric motor. The pressure delivered by the compressor

was 1 bar above the minimum required pressure to sustain the oil

produc on.

The compressor vendor advised that the compressor would have

been unfit‐for‐purpose in less than 6 months due to the ongoing

performance degrada on. The vendor’s advice was to replace the

en re compressor internal bundles (rotors and diaphragms).

www.mach10ltd.com 

Last Update: December 2016

www.mach10ltd.com 

Last Update: December 2016

LP STAGE WAS UNDERPERFORMANCE

BY 5% HEAD AND 7% EFFICIENCY

COMPRESSOR TUNING LED TO PROCESS BALANCE AND OIL PRODUCTION

INCREASE BY 7.5%

Due to insufficient historical data, MACH10 planned a monitoring

campaign to periodically asses the compressor’s behavior.

The analysis revealed that the compressor’s under‐performance was

caused by the low‐pressure stage (head ‐5%, efficiency ‐7%).

To compensate for it, the high‐pressure stage was overloaded,

resul ng in gas discharge temperature o en in the 170°C range,

which was of concern for the aluminium‐based alloy components.

In addi on, the monitoring campaign proved that the equipment

performance degrada on was not progressing.

As a performance recovery ini a ve, MACH10 recommended a

control system tuning to rebalance

the load between the two compression stages. Thanks to the

opera ng point adjustment on the LP sec on, the head gained by

the LP stage increased the final discharge pressure by 2 bar above

the minimum requirement. This was enough to reduce the load

on the HP stage and its gas discharge temperature to safe levels.

MACH10’s support allowed the client to:

Quan fy the compressor’s inefficiency and iden fy the major

contributors;

Have solid proof that a performance degrada on occurred in the

past but it was not taking place anymore, so the costly interven‐

on recommended by the compressor vendor was not neces‐

sary;

Increase the overall performance of the compressor (+1 bar of

discharge pressure at reference flow);

Reduce the thermal stress on the HP stage to a comfort area;

Rebalance the overall process and increase the pla orm’s oil

produc on by 7.5%.


Recommended