Concordance Tables for the New and Old SAT · Using the equipercentile scaling method with cubic...

College Board Research

June 2, 2016

1

Concordance Tables for the New and Old SAT

As part of determining that scores from the new SAT are valid for intended uses, College Board used equipercentile methods to link scores from the new SAT with scores from the old SAT. In keeping with AERA/APA/NCME Standard 5.18, which states that “when linking procedures are used to relate scores on tests or test forms that are not closely parallel, the construction, intended interpretation, and limitations of those linkings should be described clearly” (AERA/APA/NCME, 2014, p. 106), this document discusses the concordance methods used to link the new SAT to the old SAT. The majority of the material in this document was initially produced as a chapter for a technical manual that describes the redesign of the SAT in detail. However, it is reformatted and slightly edited here, so that it may be presented as a single self-contained document. The material in this document will be rereleased when the technical manual is published at a later date.

Background and Purpose of the Concordance Study

While redesigning the SAT, the College Board put forth significant efforts to examine score comparability, test equitability, and scale continuity issues. We also made mindful and deliberate efforts in communicating the changes between the old SAT and the new SAT to various stakeholders and the general public during the redesign process (College Board, 2015).

Due to the nature and the scope of the differences between the new SAT and the old SAT, using the term “equating” is not appropriate, as measures from the old and the new SAT do not result in scores that can be made interchangeable. In order to supply a table that relates the scores from the two measures under these circumstances, a procedure known as concordance is performed (e.g., Dorans, 2000; Kolen & Brennan, 2004). Two concordance studies were conducted as part of the assessment redesign project, an early preliminary study and a second final study. This document describes the methods and results from the final concordance study.

The concordance tables were prepared based on the internal College Board research for various intended uses including benchmark research, score reporting, and predictive validity. They are also used by external stakeholders including, but not limited to, high school counselors, higher education, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) for score reporting and other purposes. The SAT concordance tables are also intended to be used as concordance for the new and old scores of PSAT10.

Concordance Information

2

Methods

Concordance Study Design and Methodology

Concordance data were collected using the new SAT and the October, November, and December 2015 administrations of the old SAT. Using a single group design, one sample of participants completed an intact form from both measures (e.g., old SAT and new SAT). Various methodologies for linking exist as possible options for selecting a concordance table solution (e.g., equipercentile, linear, with smoothing or without smoothing [Dorans, 2000; Kolen & Brennan, 2004]). The ideal approach, which was used here, is to examine multiple solutions and select the most appropriate one. The criteria for deciding which concordance table to choose include coverage of the full area score scale (e.g., 200 to 800) and minimizing gaps between scores (.e.g., scale scores skip from 680 to 700). Using the equipercentile scaling method with cubic spline post-smoothing, the percentile ranks of the scale score points from the new SAT and the old SAT are linked to one another to determine which scores correspond from the two forms. For this study, 11th and 12th graders completed both the new SAT and the old SAT and then analyses were conducted to produce concordance tables linking the scores across these two forms.

Instruments

The two instruments used in the concordance study were the old SAT and the new SAT. Specifically, examinees who completed the October 2015, November 2015, or December 2015 administration of the old SAT were recruited to take the new SAT on December 9th, 2015. This was a single group design where students who took the new SAT on December 9th also had a previous old SAT score from October, November, or December 2015. If students completed more than one of the three old SAT administrations, only their scores from the most recent administrations were kept for the purpose of this study. The new SAT is comprised of five types of scores: (1) the Total score, (2) two Section scores, (3) two Cross-Test scores, (4) three Test Scores, and (5) seven subscores (for the specific concordances produced, see Table 1 in the Appendix). Concordances were not created for the Cross-Test scores or the subscores. Survey questions that ask about motivation level and the necessary demographics were administered as part of the answer sheets.

Participants

The sampling plan targeted 50% 11th and 50% 12th graders. A high-level sampling plan with target specifications for region, location, public vs. private, grade level, and percent underrepresented minority students was also created and intended to represent a typical SAT cohort. All schools had to have sufficient training on administering secure assessments. Students with disabilities were allowed to participate in the study as well, but were not included in the analyses.

The new SAT administration in December 2015 was conducted as an operational administration, and the scores students received from this administration were reportable. The target population was a typical SAT cohort, defined as the average of the 2011-2014 old SAT cohorts. The cleaned unweighted dataset was comprised of N = 8,677 examinees (see Table 2 in the Appendix for the score


3

correlations and Tables 3 through 9, also in the Appendix, for more detailed descriptions of the unweighted data). A weighted version of this data was created to better represent the target population. Specifically, the 8,677 examinees’ case weights were obtained, which resulted in a weighted dataset that approximated recent SAT cohorts in terms of percentages of demographic variables such as grade, gender, ethnicity, region, best language, and first language, as well as the means and standard deviations of the old SAT scale scores (see Table 2 in the Appendix for the score correlations and Tables 10 through 16, also in the Appendix, for more detailed descriptions of the weighted data).

Analysis, Methodology, and Results

The LEGS (Linking with Equivalent Groups or Single Group Design) software written by the Center for Advanced Studies on Measurement and Assessment (CASMA) (Brennan, 2004) was used in the concordance analysis, with the specific analytic steps described below:

Step 1: Data Cleaning and Screening

Four data files were received from the technical operational group: three for the old SAT (one from each administration) and one for the new SAT. The data files had been matched in the system prior to being delivered to psychometricians, so the same students were in both the old and the new SAT assessment data files. After receiving the files, College Board psychometricians merged the files by the “person_id” identifier. The original matched sample with only the most recent old SAT scores contained 8,776 students. The sample of N=8,677 was obtained after applying the additional data screenings as listed below:

1. Removed SSD answer sheets (N = 64).

2. Removed students indicated by the student irregularity reports as having irregularities (N = 23)

3. Removed 10th graders (N = 9)

4. Removed examinees who skipped the entire Reading, Math, or Writing tests of the new SAT (i.e., operational screening rules, N=3).

Step 2: Determine the Representativeness of the Sample and Weight the Sample Appropriately

At this point, the cleaned sample was ready to be analyzed for the concordance. The next step was to determine if this sample closely approximated the target population, and if not, to determine a weighted sample that would be a better approximation of the target population. As mentioned previously, the uncleaned, unweighted dataset was weighted by the variables of interest that were deemed practically meaningful. The means and standard deviations of the old SAT scores were examined before and after the sample data were weighted. As expected, the weighted dataset was a closer approximation of the target population, and was used as input data for all correlation and concordance analyses.


4

Step 3: Correlation Analyses

Table 2 in the Appendix shows the correlations between the score pairs of interest for this concordance study. The lower diagonal is based on the unweighted data, and the upper diagonal is based on the weighted data (which was used as inputs into the concordance analyses). Any cell highlighted in blue shows a correlation between two score pairs that were used to create a concordance table.

Step 4: LEGS Analyses and the Resulted Concordance Solution for SAT

All concordance analyses were done using the Linking with Equivalent Groups or Single Groups (LEGS) software program. For each score pair shown in Table 1 in the Appendix, two versions of the concordance tables are provided:

1. The “old SAT to new SAT” concordance table.

2. The “new SAT to old SAT” concordance table

The unidirectional “old SAT to new SAT” and “new SAT to old SAT” tables were obtained by conducting two separate LEGS runs. The “old SAT to new SAT” tables include every possible old SAT score and provide a concorded new SAT score for each. The “new SAT to old SAT” tables include every possible new SAT score and provide a concorded old SAT score for each. Note that while each of these tables contains all possible values for the from score (e.g., the old SAT score in the old SAT to new SAT table), because of differences in number of score points on the scales compared and the resulting gaps and many-to-one concordances, each table does not contain all score points for the concorded to score (e.g., the new SAT score in the old SAT to new SAT table). Cubic spline post-smoothing was used for all concordance tables. All the concordance tables and their plots are provided in Tables 17 through 28 and Figures 1 through 12, all of which can be found in the Appendix. Several criteria were considered when determining the recommended final concordance table, specifically:

1. Top of the scale must be represented

2. Bottom of the scale must be represented

3. Many-to-one conversions should be minimized

4. Score gaps should be minimized

As implemented in LEGS, the cubic spline post-smoothing method is replaced with linear interpolations for the lowest and highest scores with sparse data (usually 0.5%, meaning that linear interpolations are applied for from scores with percentile ranks less than 0.5 and above 100-0.5=99.5 [Kolen & Brennan, 2004]). The extent of interpolation can be manipulated, and was selected to achieve a minimal number of many-to-one conversions in each concordance table. Specifically, the extent of interpolation for the six concordance score pairs was determined as the following %s:


5

Math of the old SAT to Math of the new SAT concordance: 2%

Critical Reading of the old SAT to Evidence-based Reading of the new SAT concordance: 2%

Writing of the old SAT to Writing and Language of the new SAT concordance: 2%

Critical Reading + Writing of the old SAT to Evidence-based Reading and Writing of the new SAT concordance: 0.5%

Critical Reading + Math of the old SAT to Total of the new SAT concordance: 2%

Critical Reading + Math + Writing of the old SAT to Total of the new SAT concordance: 1.5% interpolation

ACT-SAT Concordance Tables

An additional set of concordance tables that did not involve any new data collection was produced by merging with the existing ACT-SAT concordance tables (College Board, 2009). Specifically, the results of the final concordance tables from this December 2015 concordance study were leveraged to connect the existing ACT-SAT concordance tables to the new SAT scale scores. In other words, these concordance tables are derived concordances between the ACT and the new SAT. There are two sets of the existing concordance tables, one for the ACT composite and the old SAT total score (defined as Critical Reading plus Math), and a second for the ACT Writing (pre-September 2015, before the recent ACT Writing redesign) and the old SAT Writing. These new derived concordance tables are extensions of the existing tables with the intention of adding the new SAT. However, only single score points are included (whereas score ranges were in the existing concordance tables for the old SAT). Also, the newly derived concordance tables are shown in two directions—ACT to new SAT and new SAT to ACT. There are four tables: (1) ACT Composite to new SAT Total (2) ACT Writing from pre-September 2015 to new SAT Writing and Language, (3) New SAT total to ACT Composite and (4) New SAT Writing and Language test to ACT Writing from pre-September 2015. These tables are shown in Tables 29 through 32 in the Appendix. For lower score points on these tables, there was not enough valid data to produce a valid concordance between the new SAT and ACT. Ideally, a new concordance study for the ACT and new SAT will be conducted in the future, to update the previous study with the new SAT scores, using actual student data. In the interim, to assist users during this transition phase to the new SAT scale, these derived concordance tables were created.

SAT Concordance Table Implications and Cautions

The concordances should be interpreted with the following cautions:

1. Concordance tables are sample-dependent. The sample that was used to create these tables took the old SAT in October, November, or December 2015, followed by the new SAT in a special administration on December 9th, 2015. However, we weighted the sample according to demographic characteristics of recent SAT cohorts, so the sample used for the concordance study represents this target population, although the data was collected in the admin-specific samples.


6

2. Concordances are needed for students who take either the old SAT or the new SAT. An order effect was unavoidable in the data collection design, and thus the concordance datasets were assembled from students who took the old SAT followed by the new SAT. It was not possible to counterbalance the order of administration, or more ideally have an equivalent groups design with each student taking only one of the tests being concorded. Thus, interpretation of these tables should be done cautiously, keeping in mind the order effects resulting from the data collection limitation.

3. Additional invariance evaluations will be conducted to assess the accuracy of these concordances for examinees in several demographic subgroups.


7

References

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA, APA, NCME) (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education.

Brennan, R. L. (2004). Manual for LEGS Version 2.0 (CASMA Research Report No. 3). Iowa City, IA: Center for Advanced Studies in Measurement and Assessment, The University of Iowa (Available from the web address: http://www.education.uiowa.edu/centers/casma/home)

College Board. (2009). ACT and SAT concordance tables (RN-40). New York: The College Board.

College Board. (2015). Test Specifications for the redesigned SAT. New York: The College Board.

Dorans, N. J. (2000). Distinctions among classes of linkages. College Board Research Note (RN-11). New York: The College Board.

Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking, Second Edition. New York: Springer.


8

Appendix

Table 1

Old SAT to New SAT

Old SAT New SAT

Math (200-800) Math Section Score (200-800)

Critical Reading (200-800) Reading Test Score (10-40)

Writing (200-800) Writing and Language Test Score (10-40)

Critical Reading + Writing (400-1600) Evidence-Based Reading and Writing (ERW) Section Score (200-800)

Critical Reading + Math (400-1600) Total Score (ERW + Math Section; 400-1600)

Critical Reading + Math + Writing (600-2400)

Total Score (ERW + Math Section; 400-1600)


9

Table 2 Correlations between Old SAT and New SAT score pairs for concordances (Lower diagonal from unweighted sample, Upper diagonal from weighted sample)

Old M Old CR Old W Old CR+W Old M +

CR Old M + CR + W New M New R New W&L New ERW New Total

Old M 1.000 0.759 0.764 0.794 0.940 0.910 0.880 0.700 0.735 0.750 0.864

Old CR 0.737 1.000 0.839 0.959 0.936 0.934 0.725 0.825 0.808 0.854 0.836

Old W 0.737 0.820 1.000 0.959 0.854 0.935 0.719 0.758 0.805 0.817 0.814

Old CR + W 0.773 0.955 0.953 1.000 0.933 0.974 0.753 0.825 0.841 0.872 0.860

Old M+ CR 0.934 0.930 0.834 0.925 1.000 0.983 0.857 0.812 0.822 0.855 0.907

Old M + CR + W 0.901 0.927 0.926 0.971 0.981 1.000 0.838 0.821 0.844 0.871 0.905

New M 0.868 0.702 0.691 0.730 0.844 0.823 1.000 0.735 0.758 0.781 0.945

New R 0.679 0.810 0.736 0.811 0.798 0.807 0.717 1.000 0.827 0.956 0.895

New W & L 0.715 0.789 0.785 0.825 0.806 0.830 0.740 0.811 1.000 0.956 0.907

New ERW 0.732 0.840 0.799 0.859 0.843 0.860 0.765 0.952 0.951 1.000 0.943

New Total 0.852 0.821 0.793 0.846 0.897 0.896 0.940 0.888 0.900 0.939 1.000 M=Math; R=Reading; W=Writing; W&L = Writing and Language; CR = Critical Reading; ERW = Evidence-Based Reading and Writing


10

Table 3

Demographic Characteristics of the Unweighted SAT Concordance Data

Overall Descriptive Statistics for the Unweighted Total Group (N =8,677)

Subject New SAT Mean (SD)

Corr. Old SAT Mean (SD)

Old SAT Mean (SD)

(Cohort)

Reading 26.97 (5.16) 0.810

497.22 (101.21)

496.50 (114.50)

Math 536.71 (97.96) 0.868

505.27 (104.64)

513.75 (118.00)

Writing 27.11 (5.12) 0.785

477.89 (98.97)

488.00 (114.00)


11

Table 4 Demographic Characteristics of the Unweighted SAT Concordance Data

Grade Level (New SAT Response)

Reading Scores Weighted Group/ Subgroup

N Percent Percent (Cohort*)

New SAT Mean (SD) or Std.Diff.

Corr. Old SAT Mean (SD) or Std.Diff.

Old SAT Mean (SD) or Std.Diff

(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) 11th Grade 3230 37.225 32.25 0.347 0.835 0.259 0.17 12th Grade 5447 62.775 67.25 -0.206 0.781 -0.154 -0.08

Math Scores Weighted Group/ Subgroup





(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) 11th Grade 3230 37.225 32.25 0.345 0.88 0.281 0.15 12th Grade 5447 62.775 67.25 -0.205 0.849 -0.167 -0.07

Writing Scores Weighted Group/ Subgroup





(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) 11th Grade 3230 37.225 32.25 0.336 0.811 0.262 0.18 12th Grade 5447 62.775 67.25 -0.199 0.753 -0.155 -0.08 *Cohort results are averages of the 2011-2014 Cohort.


12

Table 5

Demographic Characteristics of the Unweighted SAT Concordance Data Gender (New SAT Response)

Reading Scores

Weighted Group/ Subgroup





(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) F 5192 59.836 53 -0.027 0.814 -0.053 0.02 M 3485 40.164 47 0.04 0.805 0.079 -0.02

Math Scores Weighted Group/ Subgroup





(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) F 5192 59.836 53 -0.148 0.858 -0.153 -0.12 M 3485 40.164 47 0.221 0.87 0.228 0.15






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) F 5192 59.836 53 -0.003 0.793 0.01 0.05 M 3485 40.164 47 0.004 0.773 -0.015 -0.06 *Cohort results are averages of the 2011-2014 Cohort.


13


First Language (New SAT Response)






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) No Response 46 0.53 3.25 -0.288 0.824 -0.258 -0.43 English Only 5815 67.016 69.25 0.108 0.811 0.108 0.10 English and Another language 1723 19.857 15.50 -0.218 0.789 -0.199 -0.14 Another language 1093 12.597 12.25 -0.217 0.801 -0.251 -0.30

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) No Response 46 0.53 3.25 -0.29 0.848 -0.187 -0.03 English Only 5815 67.016 69.25 0.074 0.865 0.065 -0.01 English and Another language 1723 19.857 15.50 -0.187 0.872 -0.183 -0.04 Another language 1093 12.597 12.25 -0.087 0.867 -0.051 0.11

Writing Scores






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) No Response 46 0.53 3.25 -0.392 0.82 -0.216 -0.30 English Only 5815 67.016 69.25 0.114 0.79 0.074 0.06 English and Another language 1723 19.857 15.50 -0.228 0.782 -0.149 -0.07 Another language 1093 12.597 12.25 -0.231 0.742 -0.148 -0.16


14

Table 7

Demographic Characteristics of the Unweighted SAT Concordance Data

Best Language (New SAT Response)






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) No Response 60 0.691 3 -0.588 0.832 -0.501 -0.64 English Only 6506 74.98 75.25 0.103 0.812 0.107 0.11 English and Another language 1924 22.174 18.50 -0.266 0.777 -0.269 -0.23 Another language 187 2.155 4 -0.674 0.725 -0.792 -0.62

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) No Response 60 0.691 3 -0.596 0.862 -0.52 -0.22 English Only 6506 74.98 75.25 0.081 0.868 0.075 0.02 English and Another language 1924 22.174 18.50 -0.26 0.856 -0.239 -0.11 Another language 187 2.155 4 0.053 0.857 0.022 0.36

Writing Scores






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) No Response 60 0.691 3 -0.589 0.825 -0.582 -0.51 English Only 6506 74.98 75.25 0.104 0.79 0.084 0.07 English and Another language 1924 22.174 18.50 -0.279 0.745 -0.21 -0.14 Another language 187 2.155 4 -0.566 0.702 -0.593 -0.38


15


Ethnicity






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) I do not wish to respond 432 4.979 3.50 -0.374 0.813 -0.374 -0.46 American Indian or Alaska Native 131 1.51 1.00 0.051 0.685 0.064 -0.12 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 816 9.404 11.75 0.281 0.797 0.297 0.20 Black or African American 1183 13.634 13.00 -0.557 0.754 -0.55 -0.59 Mexican or Mexican American 1160 13.369 6.75 -0.286 0.769 -0.297 -0.41 Puerto Rican 103 1.187 2.00 -0.313 0.804 -0.332 -0.37 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 942 10.856 8.50 -0.345 0.751 -0.324 -0.41 White 3845 44.313 50.75 0.334 0.796 0.327 0.27 Other 65 0.749 4.00 -0.181 0.811 -0.16 -0.04

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) I do not wish to respond 432 4.979 3.50 -0.38 0.85 -0.387 -0.11 American Indian or Alaska Native 131 1.51 1.00 -0.034 0.782 -0.028 -0.23 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 816 9.404 11.75 0.642 0.865 0.684 0.70 Black or African American 1183 13.634 13.00 -0.644 0.827 -0.673 -0.72 Mexican or Mexican American 1160 13.369 6.75 -0.292 0.838 -0.293 -0.42 Puerto Rican 103 1.187 2.00 -0.371 0.846 -0.426 -0.53 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 942 10.856 8.50 -0.416 0.813 -0.363 -0.45 White 3845 44.313 50.75 0.307 0.842 0.297 0.18 Other 65 0.749 4.00 -0.07 0.888 -0.105 0.04


16






(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) I do not wish to respond 432 4.979 3.50 -0.379 0.781 -0.358 -0.36 American Indian or Alaska Native 131 1.51 1.00 -0.054 0.652 -0.081 -0.23 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 816 9.404 11.75 0.37 0.76 0.427 0.35 Black or African American 1183 13.634 13.00 -0.586 0.749 -0.575 -0.62 Mexican or Mexican American 1160 13.369 6.75 -0.298 0.755 -0.277 -0.39 Puerto Rican 103 1.187 2.00 -0.324 0.816 -0.282 -0.40 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 942 10.856 8.50 -0.384 0.738 -0.293 -0.40 White 3845 44.313 50.75 0.34 0.753 0.294 0.23 Other 65 0.749 4.00 -0.043 0.817 -0.091 0.03


17

Table 9

Demographic Characteristics of the Unweighted SAT Concordance Data Region (New SAT Response)

Reading Scores



New SAT Mean (SD) or

Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 26.966 (5.158) 0.810 497.22 (101.21) 496.50 (114.50) Missing 897 10.338 7.75 -0.125 0.778 -0.128 -0.13 MRO 490 5.647 6.25 0.002 0.811 -0.01 0.31 MSRO 1475 16.999 24.50 0.219 0.829 0.202 -0.05 NERO 193 2.224 8.00 -0.182 0.813 -0.175 0.09 SRO 3089 35.6 21.00 0.028 0.805 0.035 0.01 SWRO 1089 12.55 10.75 -0.152 0.812 -0.155 -0.16 WRO 1444 16.642 21.50 -0.069 0.802 -0.059 0.06

Math Scores




Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 536.71 (97.96) 0.868 505.27 (104.64) 513.75 (118.00) Missing 897 10.338 7.75 -0.184 0.84 -0.187 0.59 MRO 490 5.647 6.25 0.073 0.896 0.012 0.22 MSRO 1475 16.999 24.50 0.273 0.868 0.246 -0.09 NERO 193 2.224 8.00 -0.18 0.858 -0.192 0.02 SRO 3089 35.6 21.00 -0.03 0.865 -0.02 -0.13 SWRO 1089 12.55 10.75 -0.067 0.888 -0.069 -0.11 WRO 1444 16.642 21.50 -0.049 0.85 -0.019 0.01


18

Writing Scores




Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 8677 100 100.00 27.114 (5.116) 0.785 477.89 (98.97) 488.00 (114.00) Missing 897 10.338 7.75 -0.13 0.722 -0.132 0.11 MRO 490 5.647 6.25 0.055 0.794 -0.044 0.24 MSRO 1475 16.999 24.50 0.221 0.807 0.211 -0.05 NERO 193 2.224 8.00 -0.286 0.826 -0.14 0.12 SRO 3089 35.6 21.00 0.03 0.776 0.029 -0.06 SWRO 1089 12.55 10.75 -0.179 0.793 -0.188 -0.20 WRO 1444 16.642 21.50 -0.054 0.778 -0.019 0.08


19

Table 10

Demographic Characteristics of the Weighted SAT Concordance Data

Overall Descriptive Statistics for the Weighted Total Group

Subject New SAT Mean (SD)

Corr. Old SAT Mean (SD)

Old SAT Mean (SD)

(Cohort)

Reading 27.03 (5.37) 0.825

497.38 (108.83)

496.50 (114.50)

Math 543.10

(104.36) 0.880 512.43

(112.55) 513.75

(118.00)

Writing 27.21 (5.37) 0.805

483.55 (107.67)

488.00 (114.00)


20

Table 11 Demographic Characteristics of the Weighted SAT Concordance Data

Grade Level (New SAT Response)


Percent Percent (Cohort*)


Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) 11th Grade 35.393 32.25 0.39 0.846 0.306 0.17 12th Grade 64.607 67.25 -0.214 0.797 -0.168 -0.08

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) 11th Grade 35.393 32.25 0.389 0.894 0.33 0.15 12th Grade 64.607 67.25 -0.213 0.859 -0.181 -0.07

Writing Scores




Std.Diff.

Corr. Old SAT Mean (SD) or

Std.Diff.


(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) 11th Grade 35.393 32.25 0.38 0.83 0.316 0.18 12th Grade 64.607 67.25 -0.208 0.772 -0.173 -0.08 *Cohort results are averages of the 2011-2014 Cohort.


21

Table 12

Demographic Characteristics of the Weighted SAT Concordance Data Gender (New SAT Response)

Reading Scores




Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) F 56.124 53 -0.032 0.827 -0.054 0.02 M 43.876 47 0.04 0.822 0.069 -0.02

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) F 56.124 53 -0.166 0.871 -0.165 -0.12 M 43.876 47 0.212 0.88 0.212 0.15

Writing Scores




Std.Diff.

Corr. Old SAT Mean (SD) or

Std.Diff.


(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) F 56.124 53 -0.009 0.81 0.005 0.05 M 43.876 47 0.011 0.799 -0.006 -0.06 *Cohort results are averages of the 2011-2014 Cohort.


22


First Language (New SAT Response)






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) No Response 1.883 3.25 -0.435 0.79 -0.393 -0.43 English Only 67.585 69.25 0.11 0.824 0.106 0.10 English and Another language 17.765 15.50 -0.216 0.812 -0.191 -0.14 Another language 12.767 12.25 -0.217 0.822 -0.239 -0.30

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) No Response 1.883 3.25 -0.313 0.828 -0.333 -0.03 English Only 67.585 69.25 0.06 0.878 0.054 -0.01 English and Another language 17.765 15.50 -0.175 0.891 -0.166 -0.04 Another language 12.767 12.25 -0.03 0.874 -0.003 0.11

Writing Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) No Response 1.883 3.25 -0.623 0.802 -0.377 -0.30 English Only 67.585 69.25 0.114 0.807 0.072 0.06 English and Another language 17.765 15.50 -0.212 0.812 -0.134 -0.07 Another language 12.767 12.25 -0.216 0.773 -0.141 -0.16


23

Table 14

Demographic Characteristics of the Weighted SAT Concordance Data

Best Language (New SAT Response)






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) No Response 1.787 3 -0.459 0.826 -0.427 -0.64 English Only 74.777 75.25 0.111 0.826 0.111 0.11 English and Another language 20.177 18.50 -0.269 0.801 -0.256 -0.23 Another language 3.259 4 -0.631 0.718 -0.716 -0.62

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) No Response 1.787 3 -0.379 0.833 -0.378 -0.22 English Only 74.777 75.25 0.074 0.882 0.069 0.02 English and Another language 20.177 18.50 -0.252 0.875 -0.227 -0.11 Another language 3.259 4 0.079 0.842 0.037 0.36

Writing Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) No Response 1.787 3 -0.628 0.795 -0.472 -0.51 English Only 74.777 75.25 0.111 0.809 0.09 0.07 English and Another language 20.177 18.50 -0.27 0.775 -0.207 -0.14 Another language 3.259 4 -0.531 0.722 -0.531 -0.38


24


Ethnicity






(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) I do not wish to respond 4.241 3.50 -0.456 0.823 -0.456 -0.46 American Indian or Alaska Native 1.124 1.00 0.013 0.69 0.026 -0.12 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 11.373 11.75 0.282 0.816 0.31 0.20 Black or African American 13.254 13.00 -0.597 0.765 -0.587 -0.59 Mexican or Mexican American 9.665 6.75 -0.332 0.771 -0.343 -0.41 Puerto Rican 1.529 2.00 -0.439 0.805 -0.487 -0.37 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 9.419 8.50 -0.403 0.763 -0.386 -0.41 White 47.084 50.75 0.315 0.81 0.304 0.27 Other 2.311 4.00 -0.232 0.817 -0.195 -0.04

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) I do not wish to respond 4.241 3.50 -0.479 0.857 -0.452 -0.11 American Indian or Alaska Native 1.124 1.00 -0.09 0.793 -0.057 -0.23 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 11.373 11.75 0.64 0.866 0.676 0.70 Black or African American 13.254 13.00 -0.703 0.826 -0.732 -0.72 Mexican or Mexican American 9.665 6.75 -0.344 0.848 -0.344 -0.42 Puerto Rican 1.529 2.00 -0.515 0.854 -0.578 -0.53 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 9.419 8.50 -0.483 0.825 -0.431 -0.45 White 47.084 50.75 0.275 0.857 0.265 0.18 Other 2.311 4.00 -0.053 0.891 -0.108 0.04


25

Writing Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) I do not wish to respond 4.241 3.50 -0.483 0.813 -0.41 -0.36 American Indian or Alaska Native 1.124 1.00 -0.086 0.667 -0.1 -0.23 Asian, Asian American, or Pacific Islander 11.373 11.75 0.364 0.778 0.439 0.35 Black or African American 13.254 13.00 -0.639 0.757 -0.611 -0.62 Mexican or Mexican American 9.665 6.75 -0.334 0.77 -0.316 -0.39 Puerto Rican 1.529 2.00 -0.474 0.832 -0.474 -0.40 Other Hispanic, Latino, or Latin American 9.419 8.50 -0.435 0.757 -0.354 -0.40 White 47.084 50.75 0.315 0.775 0.263 0.23 Other 2.311 4.00 -0.133 0.837 -0.133 0.03


26


Region (New SAT Response)






(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 27.034 (5.368) 0.825 497.38 (108.83) 496.50 (114.50) Missing 8.771 7.75 -0.123 0.789 -0.121 -0.13 MRO 5.979 6.25 -0.026 0.814 -0.021 0.31 MSRO 21.051 24.50 0.209 0.845 0.195 -0.05 NERO 5.168 8.00 -0.27 0.821 -0.263 0.09 SRO 28.354 21.00 0.007 0.819 0.004 0.01 SWRO 11.686 10.75 -0.121 0.828 -0.106 -0.16 WRO 18.99 21.50 -0.03 0.816 -0.023 0.06

Math Scores






(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 543.10 (104.36) 0.880 512.43 (112.55) 513.75 (118.00) Missing 8.771 7.75 -0.202 0.85 -0.197 0.59 MRO 5.979 6.25 0.029 0.908 -0.029 0.22 MSRO 21.051 24.50 0.243 0.881 0.22 -0.09 NERO 5.168 8.00 -0.292 0.862 -0.308 0.02 SRO 28.354 21.00 -0.052 0.88 -0.035 -0.13 SWRO 11.686 10.75 -0.039 0.905 -0.04 -0.11 WRO 18.99 21.50 -0.004 0.853 0.017 0.01


27




Std.Diff.



(Cohort*) Total 100 100.00 27.209 (5.369) 0.805 483.55 (107.67) 488.00 (114.00) Missing 8.771 7.75 -0.122 0.738 -0.134 0.11 MRO 5.979 6.25 0.032 0.812 -0.059 0.24 MSRO 21.051 24.50 0.213 0.822 0.191 -0.05 NERO 5.168 8.00 -0.374 0.835 -0.225 0.12 SRO 28.354 21.00 0.013 0.791 0.014 -0.06 SWRO 11.686 10.75 -0.145 0.816 -0.158 -0.20 WRO 18.99 21.50 -0.019 0.796 0.007 0.08


28

Table 17 Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Math Scores

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (200-800) 200 200 210 220 220 230 230 250 240 260 250 280 260 300 270 310 280 330 290 340 300 350 310 360 320 360 330 370 340 380 350 390 360 400 370 410 380 420 390 430 400 440 410 450 420 460 430 470 440 480 450 490 460 500 470 510 480 510 490 520 500 530 510 540 520 550 530 560 540 570 550 570 560 580 570 590 580 600


29

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (200-800) 590 610 600 620 610 630 620 640 630 650 640 660 650 670 660 690 670 700 680 710 690 720 700 730 710 740 720 750 730 760 740 760 750 770 760 780 770 780 780 790 790 800 800 800


30

Figure 1

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Math Scores

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 200 400 600 800 1000

New

SAT

Mat

h

Old SAT Math


31

Table 18

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for Math Scores

New SAT (200-800) Old SAT (200-800) 200 200 210 200 220 210 230 220 240 220 250 230 260 240 270 240 280 250 290 260 300 260 310 270 320 280 330 280 340 290 350 300 360 310 370 330 380 340 390 350 400 360 410 370 420 380 430 390 440 400 450 410 460 420 470 430 480 440 490 450 500 460 510 470 520 490 530 500 540 510 550 520 560 530


32

New SAT (200-800) Old SAT (200-800) 570 550 580 560 590 570 600 580 610 590 620 600 630 610 640 620 650 630 660 640 670 650 680 650 690 660 700 670 710 680 720 690 730 700 740 710 750 720 760 740 770 750 780 760 790 780 800 800


33

Figure 2

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for Math Scores

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Old

Mat

h

New SAT Math


34

Table 19

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Reading Scores

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (10-40) 200 10 210 11 220 12 230 13 240 13 250 14 260 15 270 16 280 17 290 17 300 18 310 18 320 18 330 19 340 19 350 19 360 20 370 20 380 21 390 21 400 22 410 22 420 23 430 24 440 24 450 25 460 25 470 26 480 26 490 27 500 27 510 28 520 28 530 29 540 29 550 30 560 30 570 31


35

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (10-40) 580 31 590 32 600 32 610 33 620 33 630 34 640 34 650 35 660 35 670 36 680 36 690 37 700 37 710 37 720 38 730 38 740 38 750 39 760 39 770 39 780 40 790 40 800 40


36

Figure 3

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Reading Scores

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 200 400 600 800 1000

New

SAT

Rea

ding

Old Critical Reading


37

Table 20

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for Reading Scores

New SAT (10-40) Old SAT (200-800) 10 200 11 210 12 220 13 240 14 250 15 260 16 270 17 280 18 310 19 340 20 370 21 380 22 400 23 420 24 440 25 460 26 480 27 500 28 520 29 530 30 550 31 570 32 590 33 610 34 640 35 660 36 680 37 700 38 720 39 760 40 790


38

Figure 4 New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for Reading Scores

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 10 20 30 40 50

Old

Crit

ical

Rea

ding

New SAT Reading


39

Table 21

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Writing Scores

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (10-40) 200 10 210 11 220 11 230 12 240 13 250 14 260 14 270 15 280 16 290 17 300 17 310 18 320 18 330 19 340 19 350 20 360 21 370 21 380 22 390 22 400 23 410 24 420 24 430 25 440 25 450 26 460 27 470 27 480 28 490 28 500 28 510 29 520 29 530 30 540 30 550 31 560 31 570 32


40

Old SAT (200-800) New SAT (10-40) 580 32 590 33 600 33 610 33 620 34 630 34 640 35 650 35 660 35 670 36 680 36 690 36 700 37 710 37 720 37 730 38 740 38 750 38 760 39 770 39 780 40 790 40 800 40


41

Figure 5

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Writing Scores

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

0 200 400 600 800 1000

New

SAT

Writ

ing

and

Lang

uage

Old SAT Writing


42

Table 22 New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for Writing Scores

New SAT (10-40) Old SAT (200-800)

10 200 11 220 12 230 13 240 14 260 15 270 16 280 17 300 18 320 19 340 20 350 21 370 22 380 23 400 24 420 25 430 26 450 27 470 28 490 29 510 30 530 31 550 32 570 33 600 34 630 35 650 36 680 37 710 38 740 39 760 40 790


43

Figure 6

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for Writing Scores

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

0 10 20 30 40 50


44

Table 23 Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Combined Reading and Writing Scores

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (200-800)

400 200 410 210 420 220 430 230 440 240 450 260 460 270 470 280 480 290 490 300 500 310 510 310 520 320 530 320 540 330 550 330 560 330 570 340 580 340 590 350 600 350 610 360 620 360 630 360 640 370 650 370 660 380 670 380 680 390 690 390 700 400 710 400 720 410 730 410 740 420 750 420 760 430 770 430


45

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (200-800) 780 440 790 440 800 450 810 450 820 460 830 460 840 470 850 480 860 480 870 490 880 490 890 500 900 500 910 510 920 510 930 520 940 530 950 530 960 540 970 540 980 550 990 550

1000 560 1010 560 1020 570 1030 570 1040 580 1050 580 1060 590 1070 590 1080 600 1090 600 1100 610 1110 610 1120 620 1130 620 1140 630 1150 630 1160 640 1170 640 1180 650


46

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (200-800) 1190 650 1200 650 1210 660 1220 660 1230 670 1240 670 1250 680 1260 680 1270 680 1280 690 1290 690 1300 700 1310 700 1320 700 1330 710 1340 710 1350 710 1360 720 1370 720 1380 730 1390 730 1400 730 1410 740 1420 740 1430 740 1440 750 1450 750 1460 750 1470 760 1480 760 1490 760 1500 770 1510 770 1520 770 1530 780 1540 780 1550 780 1560 790 1570 790 1580 800 1590 800


47

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (200-800) 1600 800


48

Figure 7

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Combined Reading and Writing Scores

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

0 500 1000 1500 2000

New

SAT

Evi

denc

e-Ba

sed

Read

ing

and

Writ

ing

Old SAT Critical Reading + Writing


49

Table 24

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for Combined Reading and Writing Scores

New SAT (200-800) Old SAT (400-1600) 200 400 210 410 220 420 230 430 240 440 250 440 260 450 270 460 280 470 290 480 300 490 310 500 320 520 330 550 340 570 350 600 360 620 370 640 380 660 390 690 400 710 410 730 420 750 430 770 440 790 450 800 460 820 470 840 480 860 490 880 500 890 510 910 520 930 530 950 540 970 550 990 560 1010


50

New SAT (200-800) Old SAT (400-1600) 570 1020 580 1040 590 1060 600 1080 610 1100 620 1120 630 1150 640 1170 650 1190 660 1210 670 1240 680 1260 690 1290 700 1310 710 1340 720 1370 730 1390 740 1420 750 1450 760 1480 770 1510 780 1540 790 1560 800 1590


51

Figure 8

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for Combined Reading and Writing Scores

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 200 400 600 800 1000

Old

SAT

Crit

ical

Rea

ding

+ W

ritin

g

New SAT Evidence-Based Reading and Writing


52

Table 25

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Old SAT Combined Reading and Math Scores to New SAT Total Scores

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (400-1600)

400 400 410 420 420 430 430 450 440 460 450 480 460 490 470 510 480 520 490 530 500 550 510 560 520 580 530 590 540 610 550 620 560 640 570 650 580 670 590 680 600 700 610 710 620 720 630 730 640 740 650 750 660 750 670 760 680 770 690 780 700 790 710 800 720 810 730 820 740 830 750 840 760 850


53

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (400-1600) 770 860 780 860 790 870 800 880 810 890 820 900 830 910 840 920 850 930 860 940 870 950 880 960 890 970 900 980 910 990 920 1000 930 1010 940 1020 950 1030 960 1040 970 1050 980 1060 990 1070

1000 1080 1010 1090 1020 1100 1030 1110 1040 1120 1050 1130 1060 1130 1070 1140 1080 1150 1090 1160 1100 1170 1110 1180 1120 1190 1130 1200 1140 1210 1150 1220 1160 1230 1170 1240


54

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (400-1600) 1180 1250 1190 1260 1200 1270 1210 1280 1220 1290 1230 1300 1240 1310 1250 1310 1260 1320 1270 1330 1280 1340 1290 1350 1300 1360 1310 1370 1320 1380 1330 1390 1340 1400 1350 1410 1360 1420 1370 1420 1380 1430 1390 1440 1400 1450 1410 1460 1420 1470 1430 1480 1440 1480 1450 1490 1460 1500 1470 1510 1480 1510 1490 1520 1500 1530 1510 1540 1520 1540 1530 1550 1540 1560 1550 1560 1560 1570 1570 1580 1580 1590


55

Old SAT (400-1600) New SAT (400-1600) 1590 1590 1600 1600


56

Figure 9

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Old SAT Combined Reading and Math Scores to New SAT Total Scores

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 500 1000 1500 2000

New

SAT

Tot

al

Old SAT Critical Reading + Math


57

Table 26

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for New SAT Total Scores to Old SAT Combined Reading and Math Scores

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (400-1600) 400 400 410 410 420 410 430 420 440 430 450 430 460 440 470 450 480 450 490 460 500 470 510 470 520 480 530 490 540 490 550 500 560 510 570 510 580 520 590 530 600 540 610 540 620 550 630 560 640 560 650 570 660 580 670 580 680 590 690 600 700 600 710 610 720 620 730 630 740 640 750 660


58

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (400-1600) 760 670 770 680 780 690 790 700 800 710 810 720 820 730 830 740 840 750 850 760 860 780 870 790 880 800 890 810 900 820 910 830 920 840 930 850 940 860 950 870 960 880 970 890 980 900 990 910

1000 920 1010 930 1020 940 1030 950 1040 960 1050 970 1060 980 1070 990 1080 1000 1090 1010 1100 1020 1110 1030 1120 1040 1130 1060 1140 1070 1150 1080 1160 1090


59

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (400-1600) 1170 1100 1180 1110 1190 1120 1200 1130 1210 1140 1220 1150 1230 1160 1240 1170 1250 1180 1260 1190 1270 1200 1280 1210 1290 1220 1300 1230 1310 1250 1320 1260 1330 1270 1340 1280 1350 1290 1360 1300 1370 1310 1380 1320 1390 1330 1400 1340 1410 1350 1420 1370 1430 1380 1440 1390 1450 1400 1460 1410 1470 1420 1480 1430 1490 1450 1500 1460 1510 1470 1520 1490 1530 1500 1540 1510 1550 1530 1560 1540 1570 1560


60

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (400-1600) 1580 1570 1590 1580 1600 1600


61

Figure 10

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for New SAT Total Scores to Old SAT Combined Reading and Math Scores

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Old

SAT

Crit

ical

Rea

ding

+ M

ath

New SAT Total


62

Table 27

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Table for Total Scores

Old SAT (600-2400) New SAT (400-1600) 600 400 610 410 620 420 630 430 640 440 650 450 660 460 670 470 680 480 690 490 700 500 710 510 720 520 730 530 740 540 750 550 760 560 770 580 780 590 790 600 800 610 810 620 820 630 830 640 840 650 850 660 860 670 870 680 880 690 890 690 900 700 910 710 920 710 930 720 940 730 950 730 960 740 970 740


63

Old SAT (600-2400) New SAT (400-1600) 980 750 990 760

1000 760 1010 770 1020 780 1030 780 1040 790 1050 800 1060 800 1070 810 1080 810 1090 820 1100 830 1110 830 1120 840 1130 850 1140 850 1150 860 1160 870 1170 870 1180 880 1190 890 1200 890 1210 900 1220 910 1230 910 1240 920 1250 930 1260 930 1270 940 1280 950 1290 950 1300 960 1310 970 1320 980 1330 980 1340 990 1350 1000 1360 1000 1370 1010 1380 1020


64

Old SAT (600-2400) New SAT (400-1600) 1390 1020 1400 1030 1410 1030 1420 1040 1430 1050 1440 1050 1450 1060 1460 1070 1470 1070 1480 1080 1490 1090 1500 1090 1510 1100 1520 1110 1530 1110 1540 1120 1550 1120 1560 1130 1570 1140 1580 1140 1590 1150 1600 1160 1610 1160 1620 1170 1630 1180 1640 1180 1650 1190 1660 1200 1670 1200 1680 1210 1690 1210 1700 1220 1710 1230 1720 1230 1730 1240 1740 1250 1750 1250 1760 1260 1770 1270 1780 1270 1790 1280


65

Old SAT (600-2400) New SAT (400-1600) 1800 1290 1810 1290 1820 1300 1830 1300 1840 1310 1850 1320 1860 1320 1870 1330 1880 1340 1890 1340 1900 1350 1910 1350 1920 1360 1930 1370 1940 1370 1950 1380 1960 1380 1970 1390 1980 1400 1990 1400 2000 1410 2010 1410 2020 1420 2030 1430 2040 1430 2050 1440 2060 1440 2070 1450 2080 1450 2090 1460 2100 1470 2110 1470 2120 1480 2130 1480 2140 1490 2150 1490 2160 1500 2170 1500 2180 1510 2190 1510 2200 1510


66

Old SAT (600-2400) New SAT (400-1600) 2210 1520 2220 1520 2230 1530 2240 1530 2250 1540 2260 1540 2270 1550 2280 1550 2290 1550 2300 1560 2310 1560 2320 1570 2330 1570 2340 1580 2350 1580 2360 1590 2370 1590 2380 1590 2390 1600 2400 1600


67

Figure 11

Old SAT to New SAT Concordance Plot for Total Scores

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

New

SAT

Tot

al

Old SAT Critical Reading + Writing + Math


68

Table 28

New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Table for Total Scores

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (600-2400) 400 600 410 610 420 620 430 630 440 640 450 650 460 660 470 670 480 680 490 690 500 700 510 710 520 720 530 730 540 730 550 740 560 750 570 760 580 770 590 780 600 790 610 800 620 810 630 820 640 830 650 840 660 850 670 860 680 870 690 880 700 900 710 910 720 930 730 950 740 960 750 980 760 990


69

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (600-2400) 770 1010 780 1030 790 1040 800 1060 810 1070 820 1090 830 1110 840 1120 850 1140 860 1150 870 1170 880 1180 890 1200 900 1210 910 1220 920 1240 930 1250 940 1270 950 1280 960 1300 970 1310 980 1330 990 1340

1000 1360 1010 1370 1020 1390 1030 1400 1040 1420 1050 1430 1060 1450 1070 1460 1080 1480 1090 1490 1100 1510 1110 1530 1120 1540 1130 1560 1140 1570 1150 1590 1160 1610 1170 1620


70

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (600-2400) 1180 1640 1190 1650 1200 1670 1210 1680 1220 1700 1230 1710 1240 1730 1250 1750 1260 1760 1270 1780 1280 1790 1290 1810 1300 1820 1310 1840 1320 1850 1330 1870 1340 1880 1350 1900 1360 1920 1370 1930 1380 1950 1390 1970 1400 1990 1410 2000 1420 2020 1430 2040 1440 2060 1450 2080 1460 2090 1470 2110 1480 2130 1490 2150 1500 2170 1510 2190 1520 2210 1530 2230 1540 2260 1550 2280 1560 2300 1570 2330 1580 2350


71

New SAT (400-1600) Old SAT (600-2400) 1590 2370 1600 2390


72

Figure 12

Appendix H-4: New SAT to Old SAT Concordance Plot for Total Scores

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Old

SAT

Crit

ical

Rea

ding

+ W

ritin

g +

Mat

h

New SAT Total


73

Table 29

ACT Composite to SAT Total

ACT Composite Score New SAT Total (400-1600) 36 1600 35 1570 34 1540 33 1500 32 1470 31 1430 30 1400 29 1360 28 1320 27 1290 26 1260 25 1220 24 1180 23 1140 22 1110 21 1070 20 1030 19 990 18 950 17 910 16 870 15 830 14 780 13 740 12 680 11 590


74

Table 30

ACT Writing (pre-2015) to SAT Writing and Language Test Score

ACT English/Writing Score New SAT Writing and Language (10-40) 36 40 35 40 34 39 33 38 32 37 31 36 30 36 29 35 28 34 27 33 26 33 25 32 24 31 23 30 22 29 21 28 20 27 19 26 18 25 17 24 16 23 15 22 14 21 13 19 12 19 11 18


75

Table 31

SAT Total to ACT Composite

New SAT Total (400-1600) ACT Composite Score 1600 36 1590 35 1580 35 1570 35 1560 35 1550 34 1540 34 1530 34 1520 34 1510 33 1500 33 1490 33 1480 32 1470 32 1460 32 1450 32 1440 31 1430 31 1420 31 1410 30 1400 30 1390 30 1380 29 1370 29 1360 29 1350 29 1340 28 1330 28 1320 28 1310 28 1300 27 1290 27 1280 27 1270 26 1260 26 1250 26 1240 26 1230 25 1220 25


76

New SAT Total (400-1600) ACT Composite Score 1210 25 1200 25 1190 24 1180 24 1170 24 1160 24 1150 23 1140 23 1130 23 1120 22 1110 22 1100 22 1090 21 1080 21 1070 21 1060 21 1050 20 1040 20 1030 20 1020 20 1010 19 1000 19 990 19 980 19 970 18 960 18 950 18 940 18 930 17 920 17 910 17 900 17 890 16 880 16 870 16 860 16 850 15 840 15 830 15 820 15 810 15


77

New SAT Total (400-1600) ACT Composite Score 800 14 790 14 780 14 770 14 760 14 750 13 740 13 730 13 720 13 710 12 700 12 690 12 680 12 670 12 660 12 650 12 640 12 630 12 620 11 610 11 600 11 590 11 580 11 570 11 560 11


78

Table 32

SAT Writing and Language Test Score to ACT Writing (pre-2015)

New SAT Writing and Language (10-40) ACT English/Writing Score 40 34 39 33 38 33 37 32 36 30 35 29 34 28 33 26 32 25 31 24 30 23 29 22 28 21 27 20 26 19 25 18 24 17 23 16 22 15 21 14 20 13 19 13 18 12 17 11

Date post:	13-Apr-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	5 times
Download:	0 times

Concordance Tables for the New and Old SAT · Using the equipercentile scaling method with cubic...

Documents