Const Completion Report

8/17/2019 Const Completion Report

1/205

CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION REPORT

SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION & AIR SPARGE SYSTEM

ACME SOLVENT RECLAIMING, INC. SITE

ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS

Prepared For:

Acme-Rockford Group

Prepared By:

MWH Americas, Inc.

175 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1900Chicago, Illinois 60604

MWH File No. 1009103


2/205


3/205

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Purpose....................................................................................................................... 4

1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................. 4

1.3 Project Organization .................................................................................................. 5

1.4 Project Team Work Responsibilities ......................................................................... 5

2.0 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES ............................................... 7

2.1 Health and Safety ....................................................................................................... 7

2.2 Site Security ............................................................................................................... 7

2.3 Site Preparation .......................................................................................................... 7

2.4 Air Permit .................................................................................................................. 7

2.5 Site Surveys ............................................................................................................... 7

2.6 Well Installation ......................................................................................................... 8

2.6.1 SVE Wells...................................................................................................... 8

2.6.2 Air Sparge Points ........................................................................................... 8

2.6.3 Vapor Monitoring Points ............................................................................... 9

2.7 Conveyance Hose and Manifold ................................................................................ 9

2.8 Equipment Installation ............................................................................................... 9

2.8.1 Equipment Building ..................................................................................... 10

2.8.2 Oxidizer ....................................................................................................... 11

2.8.3 Control System ............................................................................................ 11

2.8.4 Telemetry System ........................................................................................ 11

2.8.5 Security Camera ........................................................................................... 12

2.9 Utilities..................................................................................................................... 12

2.10 System Commissioning & Startup ........................................................................... 12

2.10.1 Oxidizer Performance Sampling .................................................................. 12

2.10.2 Compliance Air Sampling ........................................................................... 13

2.11 Waste Disposal ........................................................................................................ 13

2.12 As-Built Drawings ................................................................................................... 14

3.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................... 15


4/205

Construction Completion Report Page 2 Former Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc.

SVE/AS System April 2011

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 Thermal Oxidizer Results for Method TO-15 (VOCs)

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Site Location Map

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A Photographic Log

Appendix B As-built DrawingsB1 – MWH’s Construction As-Built Drawings

B2 – Maple Leaf Environmental Equipment’s As-Built Drawings

B3 – Intellishare’s As-Built Drawings

Appendix C Well Construction Diagrams

Appendix D Analytical Data

D1 - Air Sampling Analytical ResultsD2 - Soil Sampling Analytical Results

D3 - Purge Water Sampling Analytical Results


5/205



LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AS Air Sparge

Ballard Ballard Companies, Inc. bgs Below Ground surface

CCR Construction Completion ReportFirst Environmental First Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

GAC Granular Activated Carbon

GPM Gallons Per Minute

HASP Health and Safety PlanHOA Hand/off/auto

HP Horsepower

IEPA Illinois Environmental Protection AgencyIntellishare Intellishare Environmental Clean Air Solutions

JULIE Joint Utility Locating Information for ExcavatorsKVA Kilovolt-AmpereMidwest Midwest Mechanical Works, Inc.

Missman Stanley Missman Stanley & Associates, P.C.

MLEE Maple Leaf Environmental Equipment Inc.

MWH MWH Americas, Inc. Nicor Nicor, Inc.

PLC Programmable Logic Controller

PVC Polyvinyl chlorideRAP Remedial Action Plan

RAWP Remedial Action Work Plan

RDR Remedial Design ReportRDWP Remedial Design Work Plan

ROR Remedial Objectives ReportRPM Revolutions Per Minute

SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute

SIR Site Investigation ReportSite Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. Site in Rockford, Illinois

SRO Site Remediation Objectives

SVE Soil Vapor Extraction

TACO Tiered Approach to Corrective Action ObjectivesTSC Testing Service Corporation

USEPA United States Environmental Protection AgencyVAC Voltage Alternating CurrentVLS Vapor Liquid Separator

VMPs Vapor Monitoring Points

VOCs Volatile organic compounds


6/205



1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE

MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) is a consultant for the Acme-Rockford Group, an

unincorporated association of parties allegedly liable for response action at the Acme SolventReclaiming, Inc. Site in Rockford, Illinois (Site). The Site location is shown in Figure 1.

The purpose of this report is to document the remedial system construction activities

performed at the Site. This report presents a summary of construction activities and as-builtdrawings for the full-scale soil vapor extraction (SVE) and air sparge (AS) systems.

Construction activities detailed in this report were performed in accordance with the

specifications of the Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) (MWH, December 2009).

This Construction Completion Report (CCR) was prepared utilizing information from thefollowing documents that are also listed in the reference section of this report:

• Site Investigation Report (SIR) (MWH, 2007)

• Remedial Objectives Report (ROR) (MWH, 2007)

• Remedial Action Plan (RAP) (MWH, 2008)

• Remedial Design Report (RDR) (MWH, 2009)

• Remedial Design Work Plan (RDWP) (MWH, 2009)

• Remedial Action Work Plan (RAWP) (MWH, 2009)

1.2 OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the remedial activities for the Site, as outlined in the ROR are to:

• Prevent potential human contact with contaminated groundwater through the institution

of a municipal ordinance to prohibit usage of groundwater in or from the groundwater

contaminant plume beneath and downgradient from the Site;

• Remediate contaminated soil to below Site specific Tier 2 Soil Remediation Objectives(SROs) for the soil component of the groundwater ingestion exposure route;

• Remediate contaminated soil to below the Tiered Approach to Corrective ActionObjectives (TACO) Tier 1 values for the ingestion exposure route;

• Remediate contaminated soil to below the TACO Tier 1 values for the inhalation

exposure route;


7/205



• Evaluate residual concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the soil by

conducting confirmation soil sampling after the extracted vapors, sampled by a photoionization detector, shows that the VOC removal rate has reached asymptotic

concentrations;

• Monitor remedial progress by measuring total mass removed by the SVE/AS system;

and

• Provide a report to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) summarizing

the history of operation of the SVE/AS system and tables summarizing the

confirmation soil sampling results and the mass removal sampling results. The reportwill be prepared when mass removal rate has reached an asymptotic state.

SROs for the chemicals of potential concern at the Site are listed in Table 8 of the ROR. Soil

confirmation samples will be collected by geoprobe at eight locations shown on Figure 9 of

the ROR and will be analyzed for VOCs. All of the objectives listed above are defined ingreater detail in Section 3.2 of the ROR.

1.3 PROJECT ORGANIZATION

MWH was retained by the Acme Rockford Group as the general remediation contractor for

this project. MWH retained the following subcontractors:

Company: Role:

JB Lawn Care LandscapingMissman Stanley & Associates, P.C. (Missman Stanley) Surveyors

Testing Service Corporation (TSC) Drillers

Midwest Mechanical Works, Inc. (Midwest) Mechanical

Ballard Companies, Inc. (Ballard) ElectricalFirst Environmental Laboratories, Inc. Soil/Water Laboratory

Stat Analysis Corporation Air Laboratory

The following personnel were involved in the Acme remediation project to date:

Name: Title: Organization:

Andrew Frierdich Project Manager IEPA

Peter Vagt Project Manager MWH

Chris Daly Licensed Project Engineer MWH

Robert Larrabee Construction Project Manager MWHJustin Finger Field Technician MWH

Denise Garcia Field Engineer MWH

1.4 PROJECT TEAM WORK RESPONSIBILITIES

MWH oversaw the construction of the SVE/AS system and the commissioning of the

SVE/AS system. Maple Leaf Environmental Equipment’s, Inc. (MLEE’s) out of Brockville,

Ontario, engineered the SVE/AS system and pre-assembled the equipment building

components and the logic control panel. MLEE’s SVE system included a thermal oxidizer


8/205



that was engineered and manufactured by Intellishare Environmental Clean Air Solutions out

of Menomonie, Wisconsin. The oxidizer was assembled on Site and integrated electricallyand mechanically with the equipment building and utilities.

The mechanical contractor, Midwest of Byron, Illinois and electrical contractor, Ballard of

Rockford, Illinois assisted with placement and assembly of the equipment building andoxidizer. Ballard installed the electrical wiring for all the oxidizer’s sensor switches,

thermocouples, temperature and pressure gauges and installed conduit and electrical cable to

the control panel located inside the equipment building. Midwest installed the equipment building and installed the vapor conveyance piping, natural gas piping, and SVE extraction

conveyance hosing.

MLEE performed system integration and commissioning activities from

October 18 to 21, 2010.


9/205



2.0 SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITES

This section describes the tasks conducted by MWH and its subcontractors as part of the

construction activities associated with the installation of the SVE/AS systems at the Site.

Construction began on September 10, 2010 and was completed on October 18, 2010.Commissioning of the SVE system occurred during October 18 thru 21, 2010. The system

formally began operations on October 21, 2010.

A photographic log is included in Appendix A and the as-built record drawings are included

in Appendix B.

2.1 HEALTH AND SAFETY

The Health and Safety Plan (HASP) associated with the construction activities for the

SVE/AS remedial systems is provided in the RAWP (MWH, December 2009).

2.2

SITE SECURITY

A chain-link fence was installed along the perimeter of the Site during pilot study activities

in 2009. An informational sign was posted at the northwest and east sides of the fence thatdirected the public to the Rockford Public Library and the ACMEcleanup.com website for

more information.

2.3 SITE PREPARATION

To allow access to the locations of SVE/AS wells, the equipment building, and the oxidizer,

the Site was prepared by removing oversized brush and mowing grassy areas. This task was

performed on September 10, 2010.

Prior to drilling activities, a Joint Utility Locating Information for Excavators (JULIE)

request provided utility location information.

2.4 AIR PERMIT

The IEPA air permit was issued October 12, 2010 for 12-month operation of the full scale

SVE system controlled by an oxidizer. Guidelines and compliance sampling requirementsoutlined in the permit were followed during the system commissioning and monthly

monitoring activities.

2.5

SITE SURVEYSOn September 13, 2010, Missman Stanley of Rockford, Illinois was at the Site to conduct

surveying activities. Missman Stanley surveyed the proposed locations and grade elevations

for the SVE wells, AS wells, vapor monitoring points (VMPs), the equipment building, andthe oxidizer.

On January 5, 2011, Missman Stanley returned to the Site and surveyed as-built locationsand grades of the SVE wells, AS wells, VMPs, equipment building, and oxidizer.


10/205



2.6 WELL INSTALLATION

The SVE wells, AS wells and VMPs were installed from September 22, 2010 toOctober 1, 2010 by TSC. The well installation activities were overseen by a MWH field

technician.

2.6.1 SVE Wells

The SVE well locations are shown on Sheet 4 of Appendix B-1. Well construction diagrams

are provided in Appendix C. Two wells, SVE-01S and SVE-02D, were installed during the pilot study in 2009 and have been incorporated into the full-scale SVE system. A total of 21

SVE wells are utilized for vapor extraction in this SVE/AS system.

In 2010, 19 SVE wells (SVE-03S through SVE-22D) were installed with a 4¼-inch (inner

diameter) hollow-stem auger resulting in an eight-inch borehole. The wells were constructed

with three-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe with three-inch diameter PVCscreens placed at the bottom of each SVE boring. The screens were ten-feet in length with a

slot size of 0.010-inches. The annular space within the borehole was filled from the bottomto one foot above the top of the screen with silica sand. A one-foot thick seal of 3/8-inch bentonite chips was installed above the sand pack, and the remainder of the annular space

above the bentonite seal to the ground surface was filled with 20 percent solids bentonite

grout.

The following nine SVE wells (SVE-03S, SVE-04S, SVE-05S, SVE-06S, SVE-07S,

SVE-08S, SVE-09S, SVE-10S and SVE-11S) are screened in the shallow sandy layer with

total well depths between 19 and 21 feet below ground surface (bgs), and are defined asshallow wells.

The following ten SVE wells (SVE-12D, SVE-13D, SVE-14D, SVE-15D, SVE-16D,SVE-17D, SVE-18D, SVE-19D, SVE-20D and SVE-21D) are screened in the deep sandy

layer with total well depths between 33 and 35 feet bgs, and are defined as deep wells.

2.6.2 Air Sparge Points

AS well locations are shown on Sheet 4 of Appendix B-1. Well construction diagrams are

provided in Appendix C. One AS well, AS-01, was installed during the pilot study in 2009 at

an approximate depth of 42 feet bgs and has been incorporated into the full-scale system. Atotal of four AS wells are utilized for air sparging locations in this SVE/AS system.

In 2010, three AS wells (AS-02, AS-03 and AS-04) were constructed with two-inch diameter

PVC pipe to a depth of approximately 42 feet bgs. A four-foot screen with a slot size of0.010-inches was installed at the bottom of each well. The AS points were installed with a

4¼-inch (inner diameter) hollow-stem auger resulting in an eight-inch borehole. The annular

space within the borehole was filled from the bottom to one foot above the top of the screenwith silica sand. A one-foot thick seal of 3/8-inch bentonite chips was installed above the

sand pack, and the remainder of the annular space above the bentonite seal to the ground

surface was filled with 20 percent solids bentonite grout.


11/205



2.6.3 Vapor Monitoring Points

The VMP locations are shown on Sheet 4 of Appendix B-1. Well construction diagrams are

provided in Appendix C. VMP-01S, VMP-02S, VMP-03D, and VMP-04D were installedduring the pilot study in 2009 and have been incorporated into the full-scale system. A total

of 12 VMP locations are utilized to monitor the radius of influence of the applied vacuum

across this SVE/AS system.

In 2010, eight additional vapor monitoring points (VMP-05S, VMP-06S, VMP-07S, VMP-

08D, VMP-09D, VMP-10D, VMP-11D, and VMP-12D) were installed to monitor the radiusof influence of the applied vacuum of the SVE system and were installed at varying distances

from the SVE wells. The VMPs were constructed of one-inch diameter PVC and installed

with two-inch diameter flight auger resulting in a four-inch borehole. A one-foot screen with

slot size of 0.010-inches was installed at the bottom of each VMP. The annular space withinthe borehole was filled from the bottom to one foot above the top of the screen with silica

sand. A one-foot thick seal of 3/8-inch bentonite chips was installed above the sand pack,

and the remainder of the annular space above the bentonite seal to the ground surface was

filled with 20 percent solids bentonite grout.

The shallow VMP points are screened from approximately nine to ten feet bgs and include

VMP-01S, VMP-02S, VMP-05S, VMP-06S and VMP-07S.

The deep VMP points are screened from approximately 29 to 30 feet bgs and include

VMP-03D, VMP-04D, VMP-08D, VMP-09D, VMP-10D, VMP-11D, and VMP-12D.

2.7 CONVEYANCE HOSE AND MANIFOLD

The AS and SVE conveyance hoses are two-inch flexible PVC hose with cam-lock fittings.

The conveyance hoses were installed by Midwest above grade and connect each well to amanifold located inside the equipment building. Inside the equipment building, each

SVE well has a dedicated riser pipe with a sample port, vacuum gauge, and differential pressure gauge (used to calculate the flow). Each AS well has a dedicated manifold with a

flow meter and a pressure gauge. Refer to MLEE’s as-built drawings in Appendix B-2 for

more information.

The hoses for connecting each SVE and AS well to the manifolds were delivered to the Site

on October 15, 2010 and connected the same day.

2.8 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION

On October 4, 2010, the equipment building and oxidizer were delivered to the Site. A crane

was utilized to lift and place the building and the oxidizer chamber component into the

permanent location. Mechanical contractor, Midwest and electrical contractor, Ballardassisted with placement and assembly of the building and oxidizer. MWH reviewed the

system components to verify that all system components were constructed in accordance

with the approved designs.


12/205



2.8.1 Equipment Building

The equipment building was prefabricated by MLEE prior to delivery to the Site. The

building is an eight-foot by 30-foot modified shipping container that contains all processequipment (except the thermal oxidizer), electrical, heating and ventilation systems. The

interior space of the building is divided into two rooms – the equipment room and the

electrical/control room.

The electrical/control room is seven-feet by eight-feet and contains the air compressor and

heat exchanger for the AS system, electrical panel, security camera interface and the programmable logic controller (PLC).

The AS air compressor (C-2201) is a Sutorbilt model 2M-RHC that is 1½ horsepower (HP),

38 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) and 3029 revolutions per minute (RPM). The ASheat exchanger (F-2501 XCH) is 1/3 HP, 38 SCFM and 1140 RPM. Both the AS air

compressor and the AS heat exchanger have a hand/off/auto (HOA) switch on the main

control panel that allows each equipment to be operated manually or automatically by the

PLC.

The Equipment Room is 23-feet by eight-feet and contains the SVE Blower, vapor liquid

separator (VLS) tank and pump, surge tank, discharge pump and two granular activated

carbon (GAC) treatment vessels.

The SVE blower is a Rotron 20 HP, 3600 RPM, 475 SCFM blower. A HOA switch on the

main control panel allows the blower to be operated manually or automatically by the PLC.

The VLS tank separates entrained water from the extracted vapor stream. The 90-gallon

VLS tank has level switches that activate a five-gallon per minute (gpm) centrifugal VLS

Goulds pump of ½ HP and 3500 RPM. The high level switch initiates pump operation andthe low level switch turns it off. A HOA switch on the main control panel allows the VLS

pump (P-401) to be operated manually or automatically by the PLC. The pump transfers the

captured water to the surge tank.

The surge tank is a high-density, linear polyethylene containment tank with a 150-gallon

capacity. A level switch located in the surge tank triggers the shut down the of SVE/ASsystem when the water reaches the high level switch. The discharge pump (P-7301 DISCH)

is a Goulds ½ HP, 3500 RPM, five-gpm centrifugal pump and is utilized to pump water from

the surge tank to the granular activated carbon vessels for treatment. A HOA switch on themain control panel allows the discharge pump to be operated manually or automatically by

the PLC.

The two GAC treatment units are Siemens Aqua-Scrub ASC200 drums with a maximumoperating flow rate of ten-gpm. A pressure gauge and a sample port are located at the inlets

to each vessel. Water from the surge tank is pumped through the GAC units and to one of

two storage tanks (each 550-gallons) located outside the equipment building.


13/205



The equipment building was shipped by flatbed truck to the Site. The load was lifted by

crane into the designated location. The building was then shimmed and leveled.

Once the building was positioned, packaging that protected the equipment during shipping

was removed. Exterior hoods insulated for noise were installed over the exhaust fans and

louvers. Silencer filters were installed on the exterior of the building. Three fireextinguishers and a spill kit were placed inside the building.

2.8.2 Oxidizer

The oxidizer unit, manufactured by Intellishare, is a 500 SCFM chlorinated thermal oxidizer

with a heat exchanger (Model TO500). The oxidizer is designed to destroy the organic vapor

contaminants by operating at a temperature of 1,550 degrees Fahrenheit. The oxidizer unit

was delivered to the Site on October 4, 2010 and lifted by crane into the designated location.The base and chamber of the oxidizer were placed in the designated locations and the

oxidizer’s heat exchanger and the stack were assembled on Site as directed by an Intellishare

technician.

After the oxidizer was placed on Site, Midwest installed the vapor conveyance piping(five-inch carbon steel) connecting the SVE blower (in the equipment building) to the

oxidizer. The natural gas supply pipe (1 ½-inch carbon steel piping) was installed

connecting the gas meter (located at the north side of the Site) to the oxidizer.

Ballard installed the electrical wiring for all the oxidizer’s sensor switches, thermocouples,

temperature and pressure gauges and installed conduit and electrical cable to the control panel located inside the equipment building. These activities were completed on

October 8, 2010.

2.8.3

Control System

A PLC provides supervisory control and data acquisition for the system equipment. ThePLC is housed in the electrical/control room of the equipment building. Further details

regarding system controls are provided in the process and instrumentation diagrams included

with the as-built drawings (Appendix B).

2.8.4 Telemetry System

The telemetry system allows remote access via the internet to monitor and control the

SVE/AS system. The telemetry module is a MLEE Model SL-WP wireless remote accesssystem.

Through the program interface, installed on the MWH project engineers’ computers, users

can remotely control equipment by selecting hand, off or auto control, shut down or restartthe system, review system operating parameters and diagnose system alarms. The telemetry

system records critical operating data including equipment operating hours, oxidizer

temperatures, and vapor flow rate.


14/205



2.8.5 Security Camera

A WatchNet-brand dome security camera was installed on the south east corner of the top of

the equipment building. The camera was positioned to provide a panoramic view of the Site,including access gates. The camera records information on a hard drive that is retrievable in

the event that a review of Site events or Site access is required. The hard drive provides

approximately 25 days of storage.

2.9 UTILITIES

To support system operation, electric power and natural gas supply were installed at the Site.

The existing electrical service available at the Site is 240 Voltage Alternating Current

(VAC). To boost the voltage from 240 VAC to the 480 VAC required by the system

equipment, an electrical transformer 75 Kilovolt-ampere (KVA) was installed. Thetransformer was installed to the west of the equipment building on October 8, 2010.

Commonwealth Edison connected the transformer with the main electrical service on

October 11, 2010. Ballard completed electrical terminations for the system equipment onOctober 12, 2010.

Natural gas is the main source of fuel for the oxidizer. Natural gas supply is provided locally by Nicor, Inc. (Nicor). Nicor installed the gas pipe at the north side of the Site on

September 22, 2010 and completed the installation of the gas meter on October 4, 2010.

Midwest completed installation of the gas supply line (1 ½-inch carbon steel) from the meterto the oxidizer on October 11, 2010.

2.10 SYSTEM COMMISSIONING & STARTUP

MLEE performed system integration and commissioning activities beginning on

October 18, 2010. MLEE tested the functionality of electrical, control and mechanicalcomponents to ensure the system operates as designed. Air samples were collected to verify

oxidizer performance with respect to the vendor’s specifications. The system commissioning

was completed on October 21, 2010.

System operation formally began upon completion of the commissioning task. Startup tasks

performed included initial measurements of system performance, balancing of flows across

the SVE well field, and collection of air samples per the IEPA Air Permit.

2.10.1 Oxidizer Performance Sampling

Air samples were collected to verify the oxidizer was performing within the vendor’s

specifications. Samples of the oxidizer influent and effluent were collected via Summacanister on October 20, 2010 and submitted to Air Toxics, Ltd. for analysis by United States

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method TO-15. The data from these samples

were used to calculate the destruction efficiency of the oxidizer. The calculated destruction

efficiency of the oxidizer was 97.59 percent which meets the required performance criteria(95 percent). Table 1 summarizes the analytical data and the associated calculation of

destruction efficiency. Laboratory analytical results are attached in Appendix D-1.


15/205



2.10.2 Compliance Air Sampling

Air samples were collected in accordance with the startup provisions of the IEPA Air Permit.

Oxidizer effluent samples were collected at start-up, once per day for the first three days, andtwo times per week for the first two weeks. Air samples were collected via Summa canister

and analyzed for volatile organic compounds by USEPA Method TO-15 by Stat Analysis

Corporation of Chicago, Illinois. The analytical results provided in Appendix D-1demonstrate the system is operating in compliance with the air permit.

2.11 WASTE DISPOSAL

Soil cuttings collected during drilling activities and used personnel protective equipment

were containerized in a roll-off box on Site. A composite sample of soil from each well

location was collected and submitted to First Environmental Laboratories, Inc. (FirstEnvironmental) of Naperville, Illinois to be analyzed for waste characterization parameters.

The soil was analyzed for the following parameters by the following analytical methods.

Parameters Analytical Method

Flash point 1010MPaint filter 9095A

pH 4500H+B

Phenols 420.1

Reactive cyanide 7.3.3.2Reactive sulfide 7.3.4.2

TCLP herbicides 1311/8321A

TCLP pesticides 1311/8081ATCLP metals 1311/6010B and 1311/7470A

TCLP semi-volatile organic compounds 1311/8270C

TCLP VOCs 1311/8260BTotal sulfide 4500S2,C,D

Soil waste analytical results are attached in Appendix D-2. The results confirm that the

waste is categorized as Illinois special waste (i.e. not hazardous). The roll-off boxcontaining the soil waste and the disposable personal protective gear was hauled to

Winnebago Landfill Company located at 8403 Lindenwood Road in Rockford, Illinois for

disposal on November 24th

, 2010. The manifest was signed by Gary Letcher, Attorney Chairof Acme Rockford Group, and filed in MWH’s records.

Water generated during well development and decontamination activities was containerized

in four 55-gallon drums. Samples of the contents of each drum were collected to determineif the water could be discharged to the sanitary sewer under the Site’s wastewater discharge

permit. The samples were submitted to First Environmental for analysis of VOCs by method5030B/8260B. Purge water analytical results are attached in Appendix D-3. The results

indicated that concentrations of ethylbenzene, toluene and trichloroethane exceeded

permitted discharge limits. Therefore, the purge water was hauled off Site as

environmentally hazardous waste, for treatment and disposal, by Badger Disposal of WI, Inc


16/205



located at 5611 West Hemlock Street in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on November 24, 2010. The

manifest was signed by Gary Letcher, Attorney Chair of Acme Rockford Group,and filed in MWH’s records.

A minimal amount of construction debris was generated during the construction activities.

Disposal of this waste was managed by MWH’s subcontractors at their facilities.

2.12 AS-BUILT DRAWINGS

As-built drawings are provided in Appendix B.


17/205



3.0 REFERENCES

MWH, 2007. Site Investigation Report, Soil Vapor Extraction & Air Sparge System, Acme

Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. Site, Rockford, Illinois.

MWH, 2007. Remedial Objectives Report, Soil Vapor Extraction & Air Sparge System, Acme


MWH, 2008. Remedial Action Plan, Soil Vapor Extraction & Air Sparge System, Acme


MWH, 2009. Remedial Design Work Plan, Pilot Test, Soil Vapor Extraction/Air Sparge

System, Acme Solvent Reclaiming, Inc. Site, Rockford, Illinois.

MWH, 2009. Remedial Design Report, Soil Vapor Extraction & Air Sparge System, AcmeSolvent Reclaiming, Inc. Site, Rockford, Illinois.

MWH, 2009. Remedial Action Work Plan, Soil Vapor Extraction & Air Sparge System, Acme


DLG/CAD/CRS/JEF/PJVO:\1009100-1009199\1009103 Acme Design-Build\4.0 Execution (Project Deliverables)\4.9 CCR\Acme CCR (Final).doc


18/205

TABLE


19/205

Table 1

Thermal Oxidizer Results for Method TO-15 (VOCs)

ACME Site

Rockford, Illinois

Compounds Units

1,1,1-Trichloroethane ppbv 700 ND U 100.00%

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ppbv ND U ND U NC1,1,2-Trichloroethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

1,1-Dichloroethane ppbv 65 ND U 100.00%

1,1-Dichloroethene ppbv ND U ND U NC

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ppbv 79 15.00 81.01%

1,2-Dichloroethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

1,2-Dichloropropane ppbv ND U ND U NC

1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ppbv 39 ND U 100.00%

2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone) ppbv ND U ND U NC

2-Hexanone ppbv ND U ND U NC

4-Ethyltoluene ppbv 110 ND U 100.00%

4-Methyl-2-pentanone ppbv ND U ND U NC

Acetone ppbv ND U 560.00 NC

Benzene ppbv ND U ND U NC

Bromodichloromethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

Bromoform ppbv ND U ND U NC

Bromomethane ppbv ND U ND U NCCarbon Disulfide ppbv ND U ND U NC

Carbon Tetrachloride ppbv ND U ND U NC

Chlorobenzene ppbv ND U ND U NC

Chloroethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

Chloroform ppbv ND U ND U NC

Chloromethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ppbv 440 ND U 100.00%

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ppbv ND U ND U NC

Dibromochloromethane ppbv ND U ND U NC

Ethanol ppbv ND U 31.00 J NC

Ethyl Benzene ppbv 1,400 ND U 100.00%

Heptane ppbv 540 ND U 100.00%

m,p-Xylene ppbv 4,400 8.30 99.81%

Methylene Chloride ppbv 55 ND U 100.00%

o-Xylene ppbv 970 3.20 99.67%

Propylbenzene ppbv 30 ND U 100.00%

Styrene ppbv ND U ND U NC

Tetrachloroethene ppbv 140 5.90 95.79%

Toluene ppbv 17,000 4.30 99.97%

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ppbv ND U ND U NC

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ppbv ND U ND U NC

Trichloroethene ppbv 87 ND U 100.00%

Vinyl Chloride ppbv ND U ND U NC

Total ppbv 97.59%

Total lb/hr 99.37%

Notes: Qualifiers:

NC - Not calculated U - Below reported quantitation limit

ND - Not detected J - Result is estimated

ppbv - Parts per billion volume

lb/hr - Pounds per hour VOC - Volatile organic compounds

Destruction efficiencies were not calculated if either the influent or effluent samples were estimated.

Destruction efficiencies were also not calculated if the effluent result exceeded either influent result.

Total destruction efficiencies that include the estimated results of any individual compound will be considered an estimated val

System Date Temp Flow

(F) (scfm)

Oxidizer Inlet 10/20/10 57 778

Oxidizer Effluent 10/20/10 978 778

Temperatures and flow rates reported correspond to instantaneous readings.

627.7

Destruction

Efficiency

10/20/10

0.002

Oxidizer

26,055

0.316

Influent Effluent

ACB\DLGO:\1009100-1009199\1009103 Acme Design-Build\4.0 Execution (Project Deliverables)\4.7 Oxidizer Compliance\ACME Destruction Efficency.xls\Table 1 - TO-15 Oxidizer Page 1 of 1


20/205

FIGURE


21/205

J:\209\0754 Acme Rockford\MWDWGS\2090754_SITE_TOPO_MAP.dwg, 09/17/03 07:37:53 AM

SITE


22/205

APPENDICES


23/205

Appendix A: Photographic Log


24/205

Customer: ACME-Rockford Group Project Name:

Site Name: ACME Site Location: 1915 20th Ave, Rockford, IL

Photograph ID: 001

Date: Sep 3, 2010

Location / Direction:

ACME Site /

South West

Comments:

Removal of storage container

located on Site

Photograph ID: 002

Date: Sep 10, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

Site prior to vegetative

clearing

Photographic Log - ACME


25/205



Photograph ID: 003

Date: Sep 10, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

Site prior to vegetative

clearing

Photograph ID: 004

Date: Sep 10, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

Clearing and mowing the Site



26/205



Photograph ID: 005

Date: Sep 10, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

Site cleared of brush and

mowed

Photograph ID: 006

Date: Sep 13, 2010


ACME Site /

South West

Comments:

Survey locations marked for

SVE, AS and VMP wells



27/205



Photograph ID: 007

Date: Sep 13, 2010


ACME Site /

South West

Comments:

Survey locations marked for

SVE, AS and VMP wells

Photograph ID: 008

Date: Sep 23, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Natural gas piped into Site by

Nicor



28/205



Photograph ID: 009

Date: Sep 30, 2010


ACME Site /

East

Comments:

Drilling for SVE well

installation and placing soil

cuttings in roll-off box

Photograph ID: 010

Date: Sep 30, 2010


ACME Site /North East

Comments:

Installing SVE well



29/205



Photograph ID: 011

Date: Sep 30, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Collecting purge water from

developing the SVE, AS and

VMP wells in 55-gallon drums

Photograph ID: 012

Date: Sep 30, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

After completing the

installation of all wells, the drill

equipment was

decontaminated before it was

mobilized off-Site



30/205



Photograph ID: 013

Date: Oct 1, 2010


ACME Site /

East

Comments:

Roll-off containing soil

cuttings from SVE, AS and

VMP wells

Photograph ID: 014

Date: Oct 1, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Four 55-gallon drums

containing purged

groundwater from developing

the SVE, AS and VMP wells



31/205



Photograph ID: 015

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Unloading the equipment

building containing blower and

manifold equipment

Photograph ID: 016

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /North

Comments:

Lowering the equipment

building



32/205



Photograph ID: 017

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Positioning the equipment

building

Photograph ID: 018

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Interior view of southern side

of the equipment building

where extraction blower and

well manifold reside



33/205



Photograph ID: 019

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North East

Comments:

Vapor extraction well

manifolds

Photograph ID: 020

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

South West

Comments:

Interior view of the northern

side of the equipment building

showing programmable logic

controller and electrical panel



34/205



Photograph ID: 021

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North West

Comments:

Air sparge compressor

located in the northern side of

the equipment building

Photograph ID: 022

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Western side of the

equipment building



35/205



Photograph ID: 023

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Unloading the thermal

oxidizer unit

Photograph ID: 024

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /North

Comments:

Unloading the thermal

oxidizer chamber



36/205



Photograph ID: 025

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

North

Comments:

Positioning the thermal

oxidizer chamber

Photograph ID: 026

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /West

Comments:

Assembling the heat

exchanger and stack

component of the thermal

oxidizer



37/205



Photograph ID: 027

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

West

Comments:

Installing the heat exchanger

and stack

Photograph ID: 028

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /West

Comments:

Positioning the heat

exchanger and stack



38/205



Photograph ID: 029

Date: Oct 4, 2010


ACME Site /

West

Comments:

Adding the effluent line that

will carry treated vapors to the

heat exchanger and out the

stack.

Photograph ID: 030

Date: Oct 8, 2010


ACME Site /South West

Comments:

Installing the electrical

connection to ComEd's line



39/205



Photograph ID: 031

Date: Oct 12, 2010


ACME Site /

South

Comments:

Western side of equipment

building. Installing vapor

piping connecting the building

to the thermal oxidizer inlet.

New transformer and

electrical conduit are shown.

Photograph ID: 032

Date: Oct 8, 2010


ACME Site /

West

Comments:

Electrical lines connecting

thermal oxidizer's sensors

and controls to the

transformer and the program

logic control system



40/205



Photograph ID: 033

Date: Oct 12, 2010


ACME Site /

East

Comments:

Natural gas inlet train

Photograph ID: 034

Date: Oct 12, 2010


ACME Site /

East

Comments:

Electrically powered chamber

thermocouples



41/205



Photograph ID: 035

Date: Oct 12, 2010


ACME Site /

East

Comments:

Electrically powered

thermocouples located on the

stack

Photograph ID: 036

Date: Oct 12, 2010


ACME Site /South West

Comments:

Painting the natural gas line

yellow



42/205



Photograph ID: 037

Date: Oct 21, 2010


ACME Site /

South West

Comments:

Completed SVE/AS system



43/205

Appendix B: As-built Drawings

B1: MWH’s Construction As-built Drawings

B2: MLEE’s As-built Drawings

B3: Intellishare’s As-built Drawings


44/205

Appendix B1: MWH’s Construction As-built Drawings


45/205


46/205


47/205


48/205


49/205


50/205


51/205


52/205

Appendix B-2: MLEE’s As-Built Drawings


53/205


54/205


55/205


56/205


57/205


58/205


59/205


60/205


61/205


62/205


63/205


64/205


65/205


66/205


67/205


68/205


69/205


70/205


71/205


72/205


73/205


74/205

Appendix B-3: Intellishare’s As-Built Drawings


75/205


76/205


77/205

101.54

72.00

12.15

14.15

06.00

101.54

134.91

152.79

177.79

249.79

Shipping Break

Burner End View

28.83CL Fuel Train Inlet

JunctionBox

Fuel Train

With Enclosure1" FNPT

Heat Exchanger Module

InsulatedDuct

Right View

6" 150# Style Flange

(Process Connection)

CombustionAir Blower

BalancingDamper

Flame Arrestor CombustionAir Filter

HeatExchanger Air SpargeBlower

Air SpargeControl Valve

Left View

No Loss Stack

Oxidizer Skid

49.50

69.99

224.12

207.00

27.00

78.72

Top View

Pictorial View

Estimated Weight: 8000 lbs

78

8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

6 5 4 3 2 1

ACME - Rockford, IL

MapleLeaf Environmental

LAST PLOTTED BY

Henry A

Henry A

GENERAL ARRANGMENT DRAWING

500 CFM CHLORINATED THERMALOXIDIZER

LAST DRAWN BY

APPROVED

CHECKED

DRAWN

TITLE

CUSTOMER

SOURCE

7/28/2010

DATE

DATE

8/2/2006

DATE

DATE

XXXXXX

1P AG E O F

DATE

N-10-0965-

DRAWING NO.

NTS

SCALE

N-10-0965-002


78/205

E lement Termi nal # J K

1a W hi te Y el lo w

1b Red Red


2b Red Red


3b Red Red

TE2

TE2A

TE2B

Thermocouple Terminal Designations


79/205


80/205


81/205


82/205


83/205


84/205


85/205


86/205


87/205

Appendix C: Well Construction Diagrams


88/205


89/205


90/205


91/205


92/205


93/205


94/205


95/205


96/205


97/205


98/205


99/205


100/205


101/205


102/205


103/205


104/205


105/205


106/205


107/205


108/205


109/205


110/205


111/205


112/205


113/205


114/205


115/205


116/205


117/205


118/205


119/205


120/205


121/205


122/205


123/205


124/205


125/205

Appendix D: Analytical Data

D1: Air Sampling Analytical Results

D2: Soil Sampling Analytical Results

D3: Purge Water Sampling Analytical Results


126/205

Appendix D1: Air Sampling Analytical Results


127/205


128/205

Summary of Air Sampling Results

ACME Site

Rockford, IL

Inlet TO 0965 ACME-TOXINF-110910 Outlet TO 0965 ACME-TOXEFF-102110 ACME-TOXEFF-102210

10/20/2010 11/09/2010 10:10 10/20/2010 10/21/2010 16:16 10/22/2010 12:21

Analyte Test Method Units

Sample ID :

Date Collected :

Influent to Thermal Oxidizer

Hexane TO-15 ppbv ND 110 ND ND ND

Isopropyl Alcohol TO-15 ppbv NA ND NA ND ND

m,p-Xylene TO-15 ppbv 4400 760000 8.3 27 460

Methyl tert-butyl ether TO-15 ppbv ND ND ND ND ND

Methylene chloride TO-15 ppbv 55 ND ND ND ND

o-Xylene TO-15 ppbv 970 210000 3.2 7 150

Propene TO-15 ppbv NA ND NA ND ND

Propylbenzene TO-15 ppbv 30 NA ND NA NA

Styrene TO-15 ppbv ND 3800 ND ND 2.1

Tetrachloroethene TO-15 ppbv 140 6900 5.9 ND 7.9

Tetrahydrofuran TO-15 ppbv ND ND ND 2.7 ND

Toluene TO-15 ppbv 17000 450000 4.3 19 350

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene TO-15 ppbv ND ND ND ND ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene TO-15 ppbv ND ND ND ND ND

Trichloroethene TO-15 ppbv 87 1100 ND ND ND

Trichlorofluoromethane TO-15 ppbv NA ND NA ND ND

Vinyl acetate TO-15 ppbv NA ND NA ND ND

Vinyl chloride TO-15 ppbv ND ND ND ND ND

Xylenes, Total TO-15 ppbv 5370 970000 11.5 34 610

Total ppbv 26,055.00 1,627,276.00 627.70 1,880.93 1,551.32

Notes:

ppbv - Parts per billion volume

ND - Not detected

NA - Not Analyzed

Qualifiers:

J - Result is estimated

DLG/JEF

O:\1009100-1009199\1009103 Acme Design-Build\4.0 Execution (Project Deliverables)\4.4 Analtyical Data\Air Sampling\Summary Air Sampling Results.xls Page 2


129/205

10/25/2010

Mr. Gary Wolf

Intellishare Environmental1422 Indian Head Drive East

Menomonie WI 54751

Project Name: Rockford, IL

Project #: N-10-0965

Dear Mr. Gary Wolf

The following report includes the data for the above referenced project for sample(s)received on 10/22/2010 at Air Toxics Ltd.

The data and associated QC analyzed by Modified TO-15 are compliant with theproject requirements or laboratory criteria with the exception of the deviations noted inthe attached case narrative.

Thank you for choosing Air Toxics Ltd. for your air analysis needs. Air Toxics Ltd. iscommitted to providing accurate data of the highest quality. Please feel free to contact

the Project Manager: Jacquelyn Luta at 916-985-1000 if you have any questionsregarding the data in this report.

Regards,

Jacquelyn Luta

Project Manager

Workorder #: 1010482

180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630

(916) 985-1000 .FAX (916) 985-1020

Hours 6:30 A.M to 5:30 PST

Page 1 of 24


130/205

Mr. Gary Wolf

Intellishare Environmental

1422 Indian Head Drive East

Menomonie, WI 54751

WORK ORDER #: 1010482

CLIENT: BILL TO:

PHONE:

Mr. Gary Wolf

Intellishare Environmental

1422 Indian Head Drive East

Menomonie, WI 54751

715-233-6115 x115

10/22/2010DATE COMPLETED: 10/15/2010

P.O. # 20266

PROJECT # N-10-0965 Rockford, IL

Work Order Summary

FAX:

DATE RECEIVED: CONTACT: Jacquelyn Luta

NAMEFRACTION # TEST VAC./PRES.

RECEIPT

PRESSUR

FINAL

01A OUTLET TO 0965 Modified TO-15 5.2 "Hg 15 psi

02A INLET TO 0965 Modified TO-15 6.0 "Hg 15 psi

03A Lab Blank Modified TO-15 NA NA

03B Lab Blank Modified TO-15 NA NA

04A CCV Modified TO-15 NA NA

04B CCV Modified TO-15 NA NA

05A LCS Modified TO-15 NA NA

05AA LCSD Modified TO-15 NA NA

05B LCS Modified TO-15 NA NA

05BB LCSD Modified TO-15 NA NA

CERTIFIED BY:

Laboratory Director

DATE:

Name of Accrediting Agency: NELAP/Florida Department of Health, Scope of Application: Clean Air Act,

Accreditation number: E87680, Effective date: 07/01/09, Expiration date: 06/30/11

180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA - 95630

(916) 985-1000 . (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 985-1020

10/25/10

Page 2 of 24

This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of Air Toxics Ltd.

Air Toxics Ltd. certifies that the test results contained in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards

Certfication numbers: CA NELAP - 02110CA, LA NELAP/LELAP- AI 30763,

NY NELAP - 11291, UT NELAP - 9166389892, AZ Licensure AZ0719


131/205

LABORATORY NARRATIVEEPA Method TO-15

Intellishare EnvironmentalWorkorder# 1010482

Two 1 Liter Summa Canister samples were received on October 22, 2010. The laboratory performed

analysis via modified EPA Method TO-15 using GC/MS in the full scan mode.

This workorder was independently validated prior to submittal using 'USEPA National Functional

Guidelines' as generally applied to the analysis of volatile organic compounds in air. A rules-based, logic

driven, independent validation engine was employed to assess completeness, evaluate pass/fail of relevant

project quality control requirements and verification of all quantified amounts.

There were no receiving discrepancies.

Receiving Notes

All Quality Control Limit exceedences and affected sample results are noted by flags. Each flag is defined

at the bottom of this Case Narrative and on each Sample Result Summary page. Target compound

non-detects in the samples that are associated with high bias in QC analyses have not been flagged.

Dilutions were performed on samples OUTLET TO 0965 and INLET TO 0965 due to the presence of

high level target species.

Analytical Notes

Eight qualifiers may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates as follows:

B - Compound present in laboratory blank greater than reporting limit (background subtraction not

performed).

J - Estimated value.

E - Exceeds instrument calibration range.

S - Saturated peak.

Q - Exceeds quality control limits.

U - Compound analyzed for but not detected above the reporting limit.

UJ- Non-detected compound associated with low bias in the CCV

N - The identification is based on presumptive evidence.

File extensions may have been used on the data analysis sheets and indicates

as follows:

a-File was requantified

b-File was quantified by a second column and detector

r1-File was requantified for the purpose of reissue

Definition of Data Qualifying Flags

Page 3 of 24


132/205

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-15 GC/MS FULL SCAN

Summary of Detected Compounds

Client Sample ID: OUTLET TO 0965

Lab ID#: 1010482-01A

(ug/m3)(ug/m3)(ppbv)(ppbv)Compound

AmountR t. LimitAmountR t. Limit

12 31 J 23 59 JEthanol

12 560 29 1300 Acetone

3.0 4.3 11 16Toluene

3.0 5.9 21 40Tetrachloroethene

3.0 8.3 13 36m,p-Xylene

3.0 3.2 13 14o-Xylene

3.0 15 15 741,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

Client Sample ID: INLET TO 0965

Lab ID#: 1010482-02A


AmountRpt. LimitAmountR t. Limit

29 55 99 190Methylene Chloride

29 65 120 2601,1-Dichloroethane

29 440 110 1700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

29 700 160 38001,1,1-Trichloroethane

29 540 120 2200Heptane

29 87 150 470Trichloroethene

29 17000 110 64000Toluene

29 140 190 960Tetrachloroethene

29 1400 120 5900Ethyl Benzene

29 4400 120 19000m,p-Xylene

29 970 120 4200o-Xylene

29 30 140 150Propylbenzene

29 110 140 5604-Ethyltoluene

29 39 140 1901,3,5-Trimethylbenzene


Page 4 of 24


133/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-01A


p102241File Name:

Dil. Factor: 6.10

Date of Collection: 10/20/10 10:00:00 A

Date of Analysis: 10/23/10 03:32 PM



3.0 Not Detected 15 Not DetectedFreon 12


12 Not Detected 25 Not DetectedChloromethane

3.0 Not Detected 7.8 Not DetectedVinyl Chloride

3.0 Not Detected 6.7 Not Detected1,3-Butadiene

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not DetectedBromomethane

3.0 Not Detected 8.0 Not DetectedChloroethane


12 31 J 23 59 JEthanol


3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethene

12 560 29 1300 Acetone

12 Not Detected 30 Not Detected2-Propanol

3.0 Not Detected 9.5 Not DetectedCarbon Disulfide

12 Not Detected 38 Not Detected3-Chloropropene

3.0 Not Detected 10 Not DetectedMethylene Chloride

3.0 Not Detected 11 Not DetectedMethyl tert-butyl ether

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detectedtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene3.0 Not Detected 11 Not DetectedHexane

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethane

3.0 Not Detected 9.0 Not Detected2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detectedcis-1,2-Dichloroethene

3.0 Not Detected 9.0 Not DetectedTetrahydrofuran

3.0 Not Detected 15 Not DetectedChloroform

3.0 Not Detected 17 Not Detected1,1,1-Trichloroethane

3.0 Not Detected 10 Not DetectedCyclohexane

3.0 Not Detected 19 Not DetectedCarbon Tetrachloride

3.0 Not Detected 14 Not Detected2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

3.0 Not Detected 9.7 Not DetectedBenzene

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected1,2-Dichloroethane3.0 Not Detected 12 Not DetectedHeptane

3.0 Not Detected 16 Not DetectedTrichloroethene

3.0 Not Detected 14 Not Detected1,2-Dichloropropane

12 Not Detected 44 Not Detected1,4-Dioxane

3.0 Not Detected 20 Not DetectedBromodichloromethane

3.0 Not Detected 14 Not Detectedcis-1,3-Dichloropropene

3.0 Not Detected 12 Not Detected4-Methyl-2-pentanone

3.0 4.3 11 16Toluene

3.0 Not Detected 14 Not Detectedtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene

3.0 Not Detected 17 Not Detected1,1,2-Trichloroethane

3.0 5.9 21 40Tetrachloroethene

Page 5 of 24


134/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-01A


p102241File Name:

Dil. Factor: 6.10





12 Not Detected 50 Not Detected2-Hexanone

3.0 Not Detected 26 Not DetectedDibromochloromethane

3.0 Not Detected 23 Not Detected1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

3.0 Not Detected 14 Not DetectedChlorobenzene

3.0 Not Detected 13 Not DetectedEthyl Benzene

3.0 8.3 13 36m,p-Xylene

3.0 3.2 13 14o-Xylene

3.0 Not Detected 13 Not DetectedStyrene

3.0 Not Detected 32 Not DetectedBromoform

3.0 Not Detected 15 Not DetectedCumene

3.0 Not Detected 21 Not Detected1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

3.0 Not Detected 15 Not DetectedPropylbenzene

3.0 Not Detected 15 Not Detected4-Ethyltoluene

3.0 Not Detected 15 Not Detected1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

3.0 15 15 741,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

3.0 Not Detected 18 Not Detected1,3-Dichlorobenzene

3.0 Not Detected 18 Not Detected1,4-Dichlorobenzene

3.0 Not Detected 16 Not Detectedalpha-Chlorotoluene3.0 Not Detected 18 Not Detected1,2-Dichlorobenzene

12 Not Detected 90 Not Detected1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

12 Not Detected 130 Not DetectedHexachlorobutadiene

J = Estimated value due to bias in the CCV.

Container Type: 1 Liter Summa Canister

Limits%RecoverySurrogates

Method

100 70-130Toluene-d8

96 70-1301,2-Dichloroethane-d4

99 70-1304-Bromofluorobenzene

Page 6 of 24


135/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-02A

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-15 GC/MS

w102512File Name:

Dil. Factor: 5.72





29 Not Detected 140 Not DetectedFreon 12


110 Not Detected 240 Not DetectedChloromethane

29 Not Detected 73 Not DetectedVinyl Chloride

29 Not Detected 63 Not Detected1,3-Butadiene

29 Not Detected 110 Not DetectedBromomethane

29 Not Detected 75 Not DetectedChloroethane


110 Not Detected 220 Not DetectedEthanol


29 Not Detected 110 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethene

110 Not Detected 270 Not Detected Acetone

110 Not Detected 280 Not Detected2-Propanol

29 Not Detected 89 Not DetectedCarbon Disulfide

110 Not Detected 360 Not Detected3-Chloropropene

29 55 99 190Methylene Chloride

29 Not Detected 100 Not DetectedMethyl tert-butyl ether

29 Not Detected 110 Not Detectedtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene29 Not Detected 100 Not DetectedHexane

29 65 120 2601,1-Dichloroethane

29 Not Detected 84 Not Detected2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)

29 440 110 1700cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

29 Not Detected 84 Not DetectedTetrahydrofuran

29 Not Detected 140 Not DetectedChloroform

29 700 160 38001,1,1-Trichloroethane

29 Not Detected 98 Not DetectedCyclohexane

29 Not Detected 180 Not DetectedCarbon Tetrachloride

29 Not Detected 130 Not Detected2,2,4-Trimethylpentane

29 Not Detected 91 Not DetectedBenzene

29 Not Detected 120 Not Detected1,2-Dichloroethane29 540 120 2200Heptane

29 87 150 470Trichloroethene

29 Not Detected 130 Not Detected1,2-Dichloropropane

110 Not Detected 410 Not Detected1,4-Dioxane

29 Not Detected 190 Not DetectedBromodichloromethane

29 Not Detected 130 Not Detectedcis-1,3-Dichloropropene

29 Not Detected 120 Not Detected4-Methyl-2-pentanone

29 17000 110 64000Toluene

29 Not Detected 130 Not Detectedtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene

29 Not Detected 160 Not Detected1,1,2-Trichloroethane

29 140 190 960Tetrachloroethene

Page 7 of 24


136/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-02A

MODIFIED EPA METHOD TO-15 GC/MS

w102512File Name:

Dil. Factor: 5.72





110 Not Detected 470 Not Detected2-Hexanone

29 Not Detected 240 Not DetectedDibromochloromethane

29 Not Detected 220 Not Detected1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

29 Not Detected 130 Not DetectedChlorobenzene

29 1400 120 5900Ethyl Benzene

29 4400 120 19000m,p-Xylene

29 970 120 4200o-Xylene

29 Not Detected 120 Not DetectedStyrene

29 Not Detected 300 Not DetectedBromoform

29 Not Detected 140 Not DetectedCumene

29 Not Detected 200 Not Detected1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

29 30 140 150Propylbenzene

29 110 140 5604-Ethyltoluene



29 Not Detected 170 Not Detected1,3-Dichlorobenzene

29 Not Detected 170 Not Detected1,4-Dichlorobenzene

29 Not Detected 150 Not Detectedalpha-Chlorotoluene29 Not Detected 170 Not Detected1,2-Dichlorobenzene

110 Not Detected 850 Not Detected1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

110 Not Detected 1200 Not DetectedHexachlorobutadiene

Container Type: 1 Liter Summa Canister


Method


98 70-130Toluene-d8


Page 8 of 24


137/205

Client Sample ID: Lab Blank

Lab ID#: 1010482-03A


p102222File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00

Date of Collection: NA




0.50 Not Detected 2.5 Not DetectedFreon 12


2.0 Not Detected 4.1 Not DetectedChloromethane



0.50 Not Detected 1.9 Not DetectedBromomethane



2.0 Not Detected 3.8 Not DetectedEthanol


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethene

2.0 Not Detected 4.8 Not Detected Acetone

2.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected2-Propanol


2.0 Not Detected 6.3 Not Detected3-Chloropropene

0.50 Not Detected 1.7 Not DetectedMethylene Chloride

0.50 Not Detected 1.8 Not DetectedMethyl tert-butyl ether

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detectedtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene0.50 Not Detected 1.8 Not DetectedHexane

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethane


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detectedcis-1,2-Dichloroethene


0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedChloroform

0.50 Not Detected 2.7 Not Detected1,1,1-Trichloroethane

0.50 Not Detected 1.7 Not DetectedCyclohexane

0.50 Not Detected 3.1 Not DetectedCarbon Tetrachloride

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detected2,2,4-Trimethylpentane


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,2-Dichloroethane0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not DetectedHeptane

0.50 Not Detected 2.7 Not DetectedTrichloroethene

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detected1,2-Dichloropropane

2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected1,4-Dioxane

0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not DetectedBromodichloromethane

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detectedcis-1,3-Dichloropropene

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected4-Methyl-2-pentanone

0.50 Not Detected 1.9 Not DetectedToluene

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detectedtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene


0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not DetectedTetrachloroethene

Page 9 of 24


138/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-03A


p102222File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00





2.0 Not Detected 8.2 Not Detected2-Hexanone

0.50 Not Detected 4.2 Not DetectedDibromochloromethane

0.50 Not Detected 3.8 Not Detected1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not DetectedChlorobenzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not DetectedEthyl Benzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not Detectedm,p-Xylene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not Detectedo-Xylene

0.50 Not Detected 2.1 Not DetectedStyrene

0.50 Not Detected 5.2 Not DetectedBromoform

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedCumene

0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not Detected1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedPropylbenzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not Detected4-Ethyltoluene

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not Detected1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene


0.50 Not Detected 3.0 Not Detected1,3-Dichlorobenzene


0.50 Not Detected 2.6 Not Detectedalpha-Chlorotoluene0.50 Not Detected 3.0 Not Detected1,2-Dichlorobenzene

2.0 Not Detected 15 Not Detected1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

2.0 Not Detected 21 Not DetectedHexachlorobutadiene

Container Type: NA - Not Applicable


Method

96 70-130Toluene-d8



Page 10 of 24


139/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-03B


w102506File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00


Date of Analysis: 10/25/10 10:49 AM





2.0 Not Detected 4.1 Not DetectedChloromethane



0.50 Not Detected 1.9 Not DetectedBromomethane



2.0 Not Detected 3.8 Not DetectedEthanol


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethene

2.0 Not Detected 4.8 Not Detected Acetone

2.0 Not Detected 4.9 Not Detected2-Propanol


2.0 Not Detected 6.3 Not Detected3-Chloropropene

0.50 Not Detected 1.7 Not DetectedMethylene Chloride

0.50 Not Detected 1.8 Not DetectedMethyl tert-butyl ether

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detectedtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene0.50 Not Detected 1.8 Not DetectedHexane

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,1-Dichloroethane


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detectedcis-1,2-Dichloroethene


0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedChloroform


0.50 Not Detected 1.7 Not DetectedCyclohexane

0.50 Not Detected 3.1 Not DetectedCarbon Tetrachloride

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detected2,2,4-Trimethylpentane


0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected1,2-Dichloroethane0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not DetectedHeptane

0.50 Not Detected 2.7 Not DetectedTrichloroethene

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detected1,2-Dichloropropane

2.0 Not Detected 7.2 Not Detected1,4-Dioxane

0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not DetectedBromodichloromethane

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detectedcis-1,3-Dichloropropene

0.50 Not Detected 2.0 Not Detected4-Methyl-2-pentanone

0.50 Not Detected 1.9 Not DetectedToluene

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not Detectedtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene


0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not DetectedTetrachloroethene

Page 11 of 24


140/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-03B


w102506File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00





2.0 Not Detected 8.2 Not Detected2-Hexanone

0.50 Not Detected 4.2 Not DetectedDibromochloromethane

0.50 Not Detected 3.8 Not Detected1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

0.50 Not Detected 2.3 Not DetectedChlorobenzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not DetectedEthyl Benzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not Detectedm,p-Xylene

0.50 Not Detected 2.2 Not Detectedo-Xylene

0.50 Not Detected 2.1 Not DetectedStyrene

0.50 Not Detected 5.2 Not DetectedBromoform

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedCumene

0.50 Not Detected 3.4 Not Detected1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not DetectedPropylbenzene

0.50 Not Detected 2.4 Not Detected4-Ethyltoluene





0.50 Not Detected 2.6 Not Detectedalpha-Chlorotoluene0.50 Not Detected 3.0 Not Detected1,2-Dichlorobenzene

2.0 Not Detected 15 Not Detected1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

2.0 Not Detected 21 Not DetectedHexachlorobutadiene



Method

98 70-130Toluene-d8



Page 12 of 24


141/205

Client Sample ID: CCV

Lab ID#: 1010482-04A


p102216File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00



%RecoveryCompound

97Freon 12

101Freon 114

90Chloromethane

98Vinyl Chloride

941,3-Butadiene

99Bromomethane

87Chloroethane

92Freon 11

132 QEthanol

99Freon 113

961,1-Dichloroethene

90 Acetone

942-Propanol

85Carbon Disulfide

973-Chloropropene

91Methylene Chloride

110Methyl tert-butyl ether

94trans-1,2-Dichloroethene100Hexane

921,1-Dichloroethane

1012-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)

96cis-1,2-Dichloroethene

95Tetrahydrofuran

96Chloroform

981,1,1-Trichloroethane

101Cyclohexane

96Carbon Tetrachloride

982,2,4-Trimethylpentane

100Benzene

951,2-Dichloroethane108Heptane

98Trichloroethene

971,2-Dichloropropane

1041,4-Dioxane

97Bromodichloromethane

101cis-1,3-Dichloropropene

1014-Methyl-2-pentanone

98Toluene

107trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1001,1,2-Trichloroethane

100Tetrachloroethene

Page 13 of 24


142/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-04A


p102216File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00



%RecoveryCompound

1072-Hexanone

104Dibromochloromethane

1011,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)

100Chlorobenzene

105Ethyl Benzene

110m,p-Xylene

109o-Xylene

114Styrene

103Bromoform

116Cumene

981,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

112Propylbenzene

1114-Ethyltoluene

1181,3,5-Trimethylbenzene

1211,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

1051,3-Dichlorobenzene

1051,4-Dichlorobenzene

111alpha-Chlorotoluene1061,2-Dichlorobenzene

1001,2,4-Trichlorobenzene

99Hexachlorobutadiene

Q = Exceeds Quality Control limits.



Method

101 70-130Toluene-d8



Page 14 of 24


143/205


Lab ID#: 1010482-04B


w102502File Name:

Dil. Factor: 1.00



%RecoveryCompound

127Freon 12

124Freon 114

129Chloromethane

123Vinyl Chloride

1251,3-Butadiene

108Bromomethane

122Chloroethane

117Freon 11

116Ethanol

115Freon 113

1151,1-Dichloroethene

114 Acetone

1182-Propanol

117Carbon Disulfide

1153-Chloropropene

109Methylene Chloride

123Methyl tert-butyl ether

112trans-1,2-Dichloroethene119Hexane

1151,1-Dichloroethane

1132-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)

116cis-1,2-Dichlor

Date post:	06-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	nil-dg
View:	217 times
Download:	0 times

Const Completion Report

Documents