Date post: | 02-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | parisangels |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 29
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
1/29
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
ARIZONA
TUCSON ARIZONA DIVISION
THE HONORABLE JENNIFER ZIPPS
AHMED SALAU, ) Case No. 4:2014cv02500
P. O. BOX 6008, )
PRINCETON, WV 24740. )
)
Plaintiff, pro se )
)
vs. ) COMPLAINT
)
CONSTANCE AGREGAARD, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
C/O MG Robert Ashley, Jr.,
448 Christy Avenue,)
Building 22408,
Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613)
)
Defendant
Constance
Agregaard.
)
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff Ahmed Salau, pro se, for his complaint alleges as follows:
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
2/29
NATURE OF THE CAUSE
This is an action for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress
arising out of defamatory Statements made by the Defendant Constance Agregaard
about Defendant Constance Agregaards dealings with Plaintiff. As detailed herein,
Plaintiff is entitled to actual damages, compensatory and punitive damages,
damages for pain and suffering as a result of Defendant Constance Agregaard s
actions, exemplary damages, special damages and other damages. Substantial parts
of the events alleged herein took place in Arizona. The most recent and substantial
events took place in Arizona and as such Arizona law applies herein. Plaintiff
requests a jury decide these claims.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action based on
diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1332(a).
Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1391(b) because a substantial
part of the events or actions giving rise to Salaus claims arose in this district.
Salau has incurred harm in this district as a result of Agregaards tortious
conduct, and Agregaard expressly aimed her tortious conduct at this district.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
3/29
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff, Ahmed Salau is a natural person and is a resident of
Princeton, West Virginia. Plaintiff majored in chemistry and psychology
and had a minor in women and gender studies. Plaintiff is also a
professional research associate, co-author, co-investigator on a number
of ongoing scientific projects that have been published in peer-reviewed
journals published by reputable organizations like the American
Chemical Society among others. Plaintiff also had another job as a
student customer service assistant at the University of Missouri Campus
Dining Services. Plaintiff was also involved and/or is a member of
numerous groups on campus including but not limited to STOP
TRAFFIC, BAPTIST STUDENT UNION, ON THE ROCK, AUTISM
SPEAKS, PSI CHI, THE FOOD BANK, GREEN DOT, Foundation for the
International Medical Relief of Children (FIMRC),among other
organizations. Plaintiff is also the Founder, President and Chief Executive
Officer of PARIS Angels a mentoring program for at-risk youth.
2. Defendant Constance Agregaard, Constance Agregaard is a natural
person and is a resident of Sierra Vista, Arizona.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
4/29
STATEMENT OF FACTS
3. On or about August 2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant Constance
Agregaard started working at Integral Resources Incorporated.
4. On or about September 1st2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant
Constance Agregaard start a consensual romantic relationship & move
in together.
5. On or about September 15th2012, Petitioner and Defendant Constance
Agregaard meet Plaintiffs family and Defendant Constance
Agregaards family.
6. On or about September 30th2012, Plaintiff and Defendant Constance
Agregaard visit the Family Health Center together and are informed
that the Defendant Constance Agregaard is pregnant.
7. On or about October 1st2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant
Constance Agregaard visit Plaintiffs attorney friend Olayinka Hamza
for the weekend.
8. On or about October 12th2012, Plaintiff and the Defendant Constance
Agregaard decide to break up.
9. On or about October 14th2012, the Defendant Constance Agregaard
falsely reports to the Police Department that she had been raped by
the Plaintiff. To with: Ahmed Raped me
10. On or about October 19th2012, the Plaintiff is arrested by the Police
Department and is in jail for seven months.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
5/29
11. In May 2013, the Defendant Constance Agregaard recanted her
statement to the police, after being confronted with insurance
receipts, phone records and time stamped photographs that disproved
her rape allegation.
12. The Defendant Constance Agregaard continues to make these false
and defamatory statements and remade them in June 2014 to Mr.
Lowe specifically stating that, Ahmed raped me
13. Plaintiff was informed by Mr. Lowe that the Defendant Constance
Agregaard made the statements.
14. The Defendant Constance Agregaards statements have beenwidely
distributed on the internet and in newspapers world wide.
15. The Plaintiff is forever damaged by these statements.
16. The Plaintiff has lost multiple jobs and business and educational
opportunities because of the Defendant Constance Agregaards lies.
The Defendant Constance Agregaard lost the jobs he had when he was
arrested and every job ever since because everyone thinks he raped
the Defendant Constance Agregaard which he IN FACT did not.
17. The stigma caused by her statements has completely destroyed the
Plaintiffs image and caused him intense emotional distress.
18.
The Defendant Constance Agregaard ended up keeping the child and
has subsequently kept the Plaintiff from having anything to do with
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
6/29
his child. The Plaintiff believes upon true belief that the Defendant
Constance Agregaard sold the child for money.
19. Several members of STOP TRAFFIC and Women and Gender Studies
students have heard Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements.
20. Several members of Plaintiffs church The Baptist Student Union have
heard Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements.
21. Several co-workers and supervisors have heard Defendant Constance
Agregaards
Statements.
22. Plaintiffs Advisors have heard Defendant Constance Agregaards
Statements.
23. Members of PSI CHI have heard Defendant Constance Agregaards
Statements.
24. Members of Green Dot have heard Defendant Constance Agregaards
Statements.
25.
Members of On the Rock have heard Defendant Constance AgregaardsStatements.
26. Plaintiff never raped Defendant Constance Agregaard.
CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Slander Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation)
27. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 25 as if fully set forth at length herein.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
7/29
28. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements and publications
described herein
(hereinafter called Statements) concerned Plaintiff and were false.
29.
Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
30. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
31. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were slanderous per se
because they injure
Plaintiffs professional reputation.
32. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
33. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
34. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri
at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The
Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
8/29
Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP
TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and
Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals
will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay
consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Slander Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation)
35. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 33 as if fully set forth at length herein.
36. Defendant Constance AgregaardsStatements concerned Plaintiff and
was false as a matter of fact.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
9/29
37. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
38. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
39. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were slanderous per se
because they injure
Plaintiffs personal reputation.
40. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
41. Defendant Constance Agregaard false and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
42.Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager
and her subsequent actions.
43. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of
Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri,
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
10/29
The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women
and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP
TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and
Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant Constance
Agregaard had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City
and community of Columbia. Defendant Constance Agregaards
statements permanently damage Plaintiffs reputation in Missouri and
all over the world. Plaintiff will soon have to leave the world of
academia and will likely face difficulties in obtaining employment at
another university as a result of Defendant Constance Agregaards
false and defamatory statements.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering
Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental
damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and
attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems
just.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
11/29
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Slander Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct)
44. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 44 as if fully set forth at length herein.
45. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements concerned Plaintiff and
were false.
46. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
47. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice.
48. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were slanderous per se
because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct.
49.
Defendant Constance Agregaards statements accused Plaintiff of
engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with
up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of
Corrections.
50. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
12/29
51. Defendant Constance Agregaard false and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
52. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates
and coworkers.
53.
Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri
at large, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The
Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and
Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP
TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and
Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals
will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
13/29
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay
consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Slander By Implication)
54.
Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 54 as if fully set forth at length herein.
55. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements concerned Plaintiff and
indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory.
56. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
57. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
58. Defendant Constance Agregaard has no reasonable grounds for
believing the truth of her Statements.
59. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with stalking her asserting as fact, no prior interaction
with him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
14/29
time stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
60. Defendant Constance Agregaard false and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
61. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates
and co-workers.
62. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri
at large,
The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology
Department of the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender
Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The
Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In
addition individuals will be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a
result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will be less likely
to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
15/29
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering
Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental
damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest costs of suit and
attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems
just.
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Slander Reckless Disregard/Malice)
63. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 61 as if fully set forth at length herein.
64. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements concerned Plaintiff and
was false.
65. Defendant Constance AgregaardsStatements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
66.
Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
67. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
16/29
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
68. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
69.Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact
that, he raped me contrary to and inconsistent with the statements
of the bar manager and the Defendant Constance Agregaards
subsequent actions.
70. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri
at large, The Chemistry Department of University of Missouri,
The Psychology Department of University of Missouri, the Women and
Gender Studies program at the University of Missouri,
STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI,
and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. In addition individuals will
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
17/29
be less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted
reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay
consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Libel Per Se Injury to Professional Reputation)
71. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 69 as if fully set forth at length herein.
72. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements concerned Plaintiff and
was false.
73. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
74. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
18/29
75. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were libelous per se
because they injure Plaintiffs professional reputation.
76. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
77. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
78. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager
and her subsequent actions.
79. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage
Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry
Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of
the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at
the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On
the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
19/29
less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay
consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Libel Per Se Injury to Personal Reputation)
80. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 78 as if fully set forth at length herein.
81. Defendant Constance AgregaardsStatements concerned Plaintiff and
was false as a matter
of fact.
82. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
20/29
83. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
84. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were libelous per se
because they injure Plaintiffs personal reputation.
85. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
86. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
87.Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact
that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements
of the bar manager and her subsequent actions.
88. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of
Missouri, The Chemistry Department of the University of Missouri,
The Psychology Department of the University of Missouri, The Women
and Gender Studies Department at the University of Missouri, STOP
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
21/29
TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and
Green Dot. In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation. The Defendant Constance
Agregaard had dedicated significant time and effort into to the City
and community of Columbia. Defendant Constance Agregaards
statements
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, and further ordering Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay
consequential and incidental damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment
interest costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Libel Per Se Accusations of Criminal Conduct)
89. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 87 as if fully set forth at length herein.
90.
Defendant Constance Agregaards statements concerned Plaintiff and
were false.
91. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
22/29
92. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity with malice.
93. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements were libelous per se
because they allege Plaintiff was engaged in criminal conduct.
94. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements accused Plaintiff of
engaging in a pattern of behavior that is criminal and punishable with
up to 30 years of incarceration at the Missouri Department of
Corrections.
95.
Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
96. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
97. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact
that, he raped me , contrary to and inconsistent with the statements
of the bar manager and her subsequent actions.
98. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
23/29
Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry
Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of
the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at
the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On
the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be
less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering
Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental
damages, costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
NINTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Libel By Implication)
99.
Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 98 as if fully set forth at length herein.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
24/29
100. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements concerned Plaintiff and
indicates the existence of other facts which are defamatory.
101. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
102. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
103. Defendant Constance Agregaard has no reasonable grounds for
believing the truth of her Statements.
104.
Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
105. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
106. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with getting her drunk and raping her asserting as fact
that, he raped me, contrary to and inconsistent with the statements
of the bar manager and her subsequent actions.
107. Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint and
permanently damage
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
25/29
Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry
Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of
the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at
the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On
the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be
less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering
Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental
damages, costs of suit and attorneys fees,and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Libel Reckless Disregard/Malice)
108. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 106 as if fully set forth at length herein.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
26/29
109. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements concerned Plaintiff and
was false.
110. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were widely published
and not privileged in any manner.
111. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements were made with
reckless disregard of their truth or falsity and/or with malice.
112. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
113. Defendant Constance Agregaard false and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
114. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of the bar manager
and her subsequent actions.
115.
Defendant Constance Agregaards statements forever falsely taint andpermanently damage
Plaintiff in the eyes of The University of Missouri at large, The Chemistry
Department of the University of Missouri, The Psychology Department of
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
27/29
the University of Missouri, the Women and Gender Studies Department at
the University of Missouri, STOP TRAFFIC, The Baptist Student Union, On
the Rock Church, PSI CHI, and Green Dot. In addition individuals will be
less likely to associate with Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
In addition individuals will be less likely to associate with
Plaintiff as a result of his tainted reputation.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of $1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will
fairly and reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their
conduct, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest and further ordering
Defendant Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental
damages, costs of suit and attorneys fees, and further equitable relief as this
honorable Court deems just.
ELEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
116. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 to 114 as if fully set forth at length herein.
117. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements and conduct were
extreme and outrageous. So outrageous as to shock any marginally
literate persons sensibilities.
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
28/29
118. Defendant Constance Agregaards Statements and conduct have
caused Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional stress.
119. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, no prior interaction with
him, he raped me that night, contrary to and inconsistent with time
stamped photographs that show otherwise and her subsequent
actions.
120. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact, he raped me that
night, contrary to and inconsistent with the events that followed and
time stamped photographs.
121. Defendant Constance Agregaard falsely and as a matter of fact charged
the Plaintiff with raping her asserting as fact that, he raped me,
contrary to and inconsistent with the statements of our roommates
and our coworkers.
122. Defendant Constance Agregaard knew and intended that Plaintiff
would suffer severe emotional distress as a result of her Statements
and conduct.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays this honorable Court to enter a judgment
against Defendant Constance Agregaard awarding compensatory damages in
the amount of
8/10/2019 Constance Agregaard False Rape Ahmed Salau
29/29
$1,100,000.00 plus punitive damages in an amount that will fairly and
reasonably punish Defendant Constance Agregaard for their conduct, pre-
judgment and post-judgment interest and further ordering Defendant
Constance Agregaard to pay consequential and incidental damages, costs of
suit and attorneys fees, special damages, exemplary damages and injunctive
relief that the Defendant Constance Agregaard refrain from further defaming
Salau and further equitable relief as this honorable Court deems just.
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________
Ahmed Salau
Plaintiff Pro Se
P O Box 6008
Princeton, WV 24740Phone) 5403151147 Fax) 5403016034 [email protected]
Dated : Princeton, West Virginia November 27th, 2014.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]