+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been...

Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been...

Date post: 06-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Coouitlam For Council September 8, 2015 Our File: 01-0125-60/1136-2010/1 Doc #: 2067470.V1 To: City Manager From: General Manager Planning and Development Subject: Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy - Proposed Amendments to Reflect Recently Adopted Regional Context Statements (Bylaw No. 1223, 2015) For: Council Recommendation: That Council inform Metro Vancouver in writing that it supports the proposed minor amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy contained in Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015. Purpose: This report is in response to notification from Metro Vancouver to Council of proposed minor amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) as a result of eight recently accepted Regional Context Statements (RCSs). Metro Vancouver has invited written comments on the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Board of adoption of the amending bylaw (Attachment l). Strategic Goal: Addressing the proposed amendments to Metro Vancouver's RGS is aligned with the City's strategic goal of excellence in governance, including developing strategic partnerships and positive working relationships with other government organizations. Executive Summary: Metro Vancouver Board has recently accepted eight RCSs, which has resulted in the need for a series of proposed minor amendments to the RGS, including to land use maps and to the population, dwelling unit and employment projections for some municipalities. Coquitlam's RCS was accepted by the Metro Vancouver Board on October 11, 2013 and minor amendments have already been made to the RGS as a result. However, there is one housekeeping amendment for Coquitlam: the Local Centres designation that had initially been applied to Burquitlam and to Lougheed in the RGS is being deleted from a RGS map since the Burquitlam-Lougheed corridor was redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS at the time that Coquitlam's RCS was accepted.
Transcript
Page 1: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Coouitlam For Council

September 8, 2015 Our File: 01-0125-60/1136-2010/1 Doc #: 2067470.V1

To: City Manager From: General Manager Planning and Development

Subject: Metro Vancouver Regional Growth Strategy - Proposed Amendments to Reflect Recently Adopted Regional Context Statements (Bylaw No. 1223, 2015)

For: Council

Recommendation: That Council inform Metro Vancouver in writing that it supports the proposed minor amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy contained in Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015.

Purpose: This report is in response to notification from Metro Vancouver to Council of proposed minor amendments to the Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) as a result of eight recently accepted Regional Context Statements (RCSs). Metro Vancouver has invited written comments on the proposed amendments prior to consideration by the Board of adoption of the amending bylaw (Attachment l).

Strategic Goal: Addressing the proposed amendments to Metro Vancouver's RGS is aligned with the City's strategic goal of excellence in governance, including developing strategic partnerships and positive working relationships with other government organizations.

Executive Summary: Metro Vancouver Board has recently accepted eight RCSs, which has resulted in the need for a series of proposed minor amendments to the RGS, including to land use maps and to the population, dwelling unit and employment projections for some municipalities. Coquitlam's RCS was accepted by the Metro Vancouver Board on October 11, 2013 and minor amendments have already been made to the RGS as a result. However, there is one housekeeping amendment for Coquitlam: the Local Centres designation that had initially been applied to Burquitlam and to Lougheed in the RGS is being deleted from a RGS map since the Burquitlam-Lougheed corridor was redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS at the time that Coquitlam's RCS was accepted.

Page 2: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Page 2

September 8, 2015

Executive Summary cont'd/ The vast majority of the proposed RGS amendments in land use designations resulting from the Board's acceptance of the other RCSs involve changing General Urban to Conservation and Recreation, changing General Urban to Industrial, creating additional Frequent Transit Development Areas and adding or deleting Local Centres. None of the changes have potential planning implications for Coquitlam. Staff are therefore recommending that Council support the proposed minor amendments to the RGS and inform Metro Vancouver in writing of its resolution.

Proposed RGS Amendments: Metro Vancouver Board has accepted the RCSs of eight local governments since early 2014. This is in addition to RCSs that had already been accepted by the Board, including Coquitlam's RCS, which was accepted on October ii, 2013. The eight more recently accepted RCSs are for Anmore, New Westminster, North Vancouver City, North Vancouver District, Port Moody, Surrey, West Vancouver and the UBC Point Grey Campus, which is part of Electoral Area A.

As a result of accepting these RCSs, a number of minor RGS Type 3 minor amendments are required to the RGS in the form of an amending bylaw that was given first and second readings by the Board at its July 31, 2015 meeting and notification sent to affected local governments with an invitation for written comments by September 16, 2015. Since the amendments are minor, there will be no regional public hearing by the Board prior to consideration of third reading and final adoption of the bylaw.

Frequent Transit Development Areas and Local Centres There is only one minor housekeeping amendment related to Coquitlam. The RGS had originally designated Lougheed and Burquitlam as Local Centres. When Coquitlam's RCS was accepted by the Board, the RGS was amended to show the Lougheed-Burquitlam corridor as a Frequent Transit Development Area. However, one map in the RGS continued to show Lougheed and Burquitlam as Local Centres (see Schedule E on Page 19 of the attached amending bylaw) even though other maps had been amended to show the Frequent Transit Development Area. The amending bylaw deletes the Local Centres designation.

As well as deleting the two above Local Centres in Coquitlam, two other Local Centres are being deleted in the RGS and six new Local Centres are being added, per Page 5 of the amending bylaw.

Nine additional Frequent Transit Development Areas are being added to the RCS, per Page 4 of the amending bylaw. Of note, one is in neighbouring Port Moody for part of the St. Johns Street corridor as a result of development of the Evergreen Line and Moody Centre Station.

File#: 01-0125-60/1136-2010/1 Doc#: 2067470.V1

Page 3: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Page 3

Septembers, 2015

Land Use Designations There are 55 proposed amendments to land use designations in the RGS, per Pages 1 to 4 of the attached amending bylaw and accompanying maps. This includes 15 amendments in Surrey, 7 amendments in New Westminster and 33 amendments in Port Moody. As shown in the table in the amending bylaw, the changes are to relatively small parcels of land, with the largest two parcels being 14.2 ha in size (both in Surrey).

The vast majority of the 55 amendments involve changing General Urban to Conservation and Recreation and changing General Urban to Industrial. In neighbouring Port Moody, all the legally designated parks are being changed from General Urban to Conservation and Recreation that had not already been designated as such in the RGS. Port Moody was also required by Metro Vancouver to re-designate two parcels from General Urban back to Industrial to be consistent with the RGS. This includes the former Andres Wine and Mill & Timber (Flavelle Cedar) site.

None of the changes in land use designations directly or indirectly impact Coquitlam.

Popuiation, Dweliing Unit and Empidyment Projections Table A.l in the RGS contains the population, dwelling unit and employment projections for each municipality and sub-region in Metro Vancouver (as well as Electoral Area A and Tsawwassen First Nation) for 2011, 2021, 2031 and 2041.

As a result of some municipalities revisiting the projections as part of preparing their RCSs, some have proposed minor amendments, which have been accepted by the Board. Page 21 of the attached amending bylaw contains the proposed replacement table. In summary, the replacement table shows: • the projected population for Metro Vancouver as 3,443,000 in 2041,

compared to 3,400,000 in the current table, an increase of 43,000 (l.3%); • the projected dwelling units for Metro Vancouver as 1,423,000 in 2041,

compared to 1,422,000 in the current table, an increase of 1,000 (0.07%); and • the projected employment for Metro Vancouver as 1,773,000 in 2041,

compared to 1,753,000 in the current table, an increase of 20,000 (l.l%).

None of the changes involve the projections for Coquitlam, although there are very minor amendments to the projections for Anmore and Port Moody, which are part of the Northeast Sector sub-region of Metro Vancouver.

Financial implications: None.

File#:01-0125-60/1136-2010/1 Doc#: 2067470.vl

Page 4: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Page 4

Septembers, 2015

Conclusion: The proposed amendments to Metro Vancouver's RGS are minor in nature and none have direct or indirect land use planning implications for Coquitlam (as noted, the removal of the Local Centre designation for Lougheed and for Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been

• redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend that Council support the proposed minor amendments to the RGS and inform Metro Vancouver in writing of its resolution.

/ /u—^ J.L Mclntyre, A ICIP, RPP

EV/AM/lmc

Attachment: 1. Metro Vancouver Letter to Mayor and Council dated August 4, 2015, including

Amending Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 (Doc.# 2067474).

This report was prepared by Planning and Development staff with external assistance for research and analysis.

File#: 01-0125-60/1136-2010/1 Doc #: 2067470.V1

Page 5: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

;:'CaiTietrovancouver SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS FOR A LIVABLE REGION ATTACHMENT 1

AUG 01,2015

His Worship Mayor Richard Stewart and Council

City of Coquitlam

3000 Guildford Way

Coquitlam, BC V3B 7N2

Dear Mayor Stewart and Council:

Board and Information Services, Legal and Legislative Services Tel. 6C4.432.62S0 Fax 604.451.6686

Re: Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Recently Accepted

Regional Context Statements - Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015

In accordance with section 857.1(2) of the Local Government Act, and sections 6.4,2 and 6.4.5 of

Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future (Metro 2040), thi.s letter provides notification to affected

local governments and other agencies of a proposed amendment to the regional growth strategy.

Metro Vancouver has initiated a regional growth strategy Type 3 minor amendment to incorporate

changes to Metro 2040 land use designation maps stemming from eight Regional Context Statements accepted between early 2014 and early 2015.

Specifically, on July 31, 2015, the GVRD Board resolved to:

a) Initiate the Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future amendment process for a Type 3

amendment to the regional growth strategy to incorporate land use designation changes and the

addition of Frequent Transit Development Areas and local centres stemming from accepted

Regional Context Statements;

b) Give first and second readings to "Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy

Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015"; and

c) Direct staff to notify affected local governments and appropriate agencies as per Metro

Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Section 6.4.2:

Over the period from early 2014 to early 2015, the GVRD Board accepted seven RCSs (District of North

Vancouver, Village of Anmore, City of Surrey, City of New Westminster, City of North Vancouver,

District of West Vancouver, City of Port Moody), plus the Province adopted the RCS for the University

of British Columbia Point Grey Campus (v/ithin the Electoral Area A).

The Regional Context Statements included revisions to the Metro 2040 land use designations that the

Board deemied 'generally consistent' with the Regional Land Use Designation Map 2, as well as new

Frequent Transit Developmient Areas (FTDAs), and local centres. The proposed amendment also

43.30 Kings-.vay, Surnaby, BC, Canada V5H4G8 • 604-432-6200 metrovancouve.norq

Gr'eats.'- Vancouver .3>jgicr.a! District • Greater Van-couvar Viaier District • Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District • Metre Vancouvar Housiirg Corporati

Page 6: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Mayor Richard Stewart His Worship Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Recently Accepted Regional Context Statements • Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015

Page 2

includes updates to the Metro 2040 Appendix A, Table A-1: Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections for Metro Vancouver Subregions and Municipalities, to reflect municipal numbers in RCS's deemed to be generally consistent with Metro 2040.

A Type 3 amendment to Metro 2040 requires an affirmative 50%+l weighted vote of the GVRD Board at each reading of the bylaw; there is no regional public hearing. For more information on regional growth strategy amendment procedures, please see Metro 2040 Sections 6.3 and 6.4. For more information on the proposed amendment, please refer to the attached report.

The deadline for comments on the bylaw amendment is September 15, 2015. Following the comment period, the Board will review all comments received, and consider third reading and final adoption of the amendment bylaw.

You are invited to provide written comments on this proposed amendment to Metro 2040. Please provide your comments in the form of a Council or Board resolution, as applicable, and submit to [email protected] by September 16, 2015. If you have any questions with respect to the proposed amendment, please contact Eric Aderneck, Senior Regional Planner at 778-452-2626 or [email protected].

Information on the proposed amendment and a copy of Metro 2040 can be found on the Metro Vancouver website at: www.metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning

Sincerely,

K Chris Plagnol Corporate Officer

CP/EC/HM/EA

End: Report - dated June 11, 2015, titled "Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to , Reflect Recently Accepted Regional Context Statements", considered by the GVRD Board on July

31, 2015.

11554500

Page 7: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

metrovancouver SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS FOR A LIVABLE REGION

Section G 1.1

To: Regional Planning Committee

From: Eric Aderneck, Senior Regional Planner

Planning, Policy and Environment Department

Date: June 11, 2015 Meeting Date: July 10,2015

Subject: Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Accepted

Regional Context Statements

RECOMMENDATION That the GVRD Board:

a) Initiate the Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future amendment process for a Type 3 Minor

Amendment to the regional growth strategy to incorporate land use designation changes and

the addition of Frequent Transit Development Areas and local centres stemming from accepted

Regional Context Statements;

b) Give first and second readings to "Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth

Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015"; and

c) Direct staff to notify affected local governments and appropriate agencies as per Metro

Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Section 6.4.2.

PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to provide the GVRD Board with the opportunity to consider first and

second reading of a Type 3 Minor Amendment to Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future

(Metro 2040) to incorporate changes to regional land use designation maps, the addition of

Frequent Transit Development Areas, addition and deletion of local centres, and changes to

populations and employment projections stemming from seven Regional Context Statements

accepted by the GVRD Board and one Regional Context Statement adopted by ..the Province

between early 2014 and early 2015.

BACKGROUND Metro 2040 Section 6.2.6 allows the GVRD Board to accept Regional Context Statements (RCS) that

include regional land use designation revisions that the Board deems to be 'generally consistent'

with the Metro 2040 Land Use Designation Map 2. Metro 2040 Section 6.3.4 provides that these

revisions can be incorporated into the regional growth strategy through a Type 3 Minor

Amendment {'housekeeping amendment').

Since the adoption of Metro 2040, the region's regional growth strategy, on July 29, 2011, ,18

Regional Context Statements have been accepted by the GVRD Board. On May 23, 2014, the GVRD

Board adopted Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw

No. 1201, 2014, which accommodated amendments to Metro 2040 associated with the acceptance

of the first 11 Regional Context Statements accepted by the Board in relation to Metro 2040.

Since then, during the period from early 2014 to early 2015, the GVRD Board accepted an additional

seven RCSs (District of North Vancouver, Village of Anmore, City of Surrey, City of New

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 552

Page 8: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Accepted Regional Context Statements Regional Planning Committee Meeting Date: July 10, 2015

Page 2 of 4

Westminster, City of North Vancouver, District of West Vancouver, and City of Port Moody). In

addition, the Province of British Columbia adopted a RCS for the University of British Columbia Point

Grey Campus (within the Electoral Area A) through a Ministerial Order in June 2015.

Metro Vancouver staff propose a Type 3 Minor Amendment to incorporate changes to Metro 2040

regional land use designation maps, addition of Frequent Transit Development Areas, addition and'

deletion of Local Centres, and changes to populations and-employment projections stemming from

the seyen RCSs that were accepted by the GVRD Board between early 2014 to early 2015, as well as

the RCS adopted by the Province. Amendments to incorporate changes made as a result of RCSs

accepted by the Board have in the past been referred to as 'housekeeping amendments' in that the

amendment is simply to bring the regional growth strategy in line with the legally binding Regional

Context Statements; the amendments have in effect already been approved, however, the bylaw

change brings Metro 2040, as the publicly accessible and consolidated record of accepted RCSs, into

alignment.

THE PROPOSED HOUSEKEEPING AMENDMENT

Accepted Regional Context Statements The most recently accepted RCSs included revisions to regional land use designation maps, as well

as new Frequent Transit Development Areas (FTDAs), and local centres. Metro Vancouver staff

provided specific analysis for all of these changes as part of the respective Regional Context

Statement submitted to the Board for approval. Through acceptance of the RCSs, the GVRD Board

determined that the regional land use designation changes and the addition of FTDAs and local

centres were 'generally consistent' with Metro 2040.

There are two outstanding RCSs that still require GVRD Board acceptance: the Village of Lions Bay

and the Township of Langley. Staff anticipates that the Lions Bay RCS will be submitted by Fall 2015;

Metro Vancouver and the Township of Langley are currently engaged in a dispute resolution

process regarding the Township of Langley RCS.

Metro 2040 Arnendment Bylaw - Maps

The proposed Type 3 housekeeping amendment to incorporate accepted Regional Context

Statements into Metro 2040 requires adoption of an amendment bylaw passed by an affirmative

50%+l weighted vote of the GVRD Board, and does not require a public hearing.

The proposed Metro 2040 bylaw amendment (Attachment) proposes 55 regional land use

designation changes (15 in Surrey; 7 in New Westminster; and 33 in Port Moody) that will update

Metro 2040 Maps 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12. It also adds nine new Frequent Transit Development

Areas (RDAs) (3 in Surrey; 2 in District of North Vancouver; 2 in City of North Vancouver; 1 in Port

Moody; and 1 at UBC in the Electoral Area A), and identifies local centres (deletes 4 local centres

that are replaced by FTDAs; adds 4 local centres in the District of West Vancouver; and adds 2 local

centres in the District of North Vancouver).

Metro 2040 Amendment Bylaw - Projections

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 553

Page 9: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Accepted Regional Context Statements Regional Planning Committee Meeting Date; July 10, 2015

Page 3 of 4

The proposed Metro 2040 bylaw amendment also includes updates to the Metro 2040 Appendix A,

Table A-1: Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections for Metro Vancouver Subregions

and Municipalities. The updates include 2011 figures based on the 2011 Census, as well as updated

growth projections based on accepted Regional Context Statements. It should be noted that the

projections in this table are guidelines only, provided to indicate each municipality's assumptions

on future growth within a range of lower to higher Metro 2040 growth projections. Some

municipalities have opted to include projections on the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore,

in preparing long-term growth scenarios for infrastructure and utility demand planning, Metro

Vancouver may choose to apply higher or lower municipal growth projection scenarios beyond

what is shown in the table.

Processing the Housekeeping Amendment

The proposed bylaw amendment, along with a draft version of this staff report, was advanced to

the Regional Planning Advisory Committee on June 5, 2015, for information and comment as

required by GVRD Regional Growth Strategy Procedures Bylaw No. 1148, 2011. No comments were

received.

ALTERNATIVES

1. That the GVRD Board:

a) Initiate the Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future amendment process for a Type 3

Minor Amendment to the regional growth strategy to incorporate land use designation

changes and the addition of Frequent Transit Development Areas and local centres stemming

from accepted Regional Context Statements;

b) Give first and second readings to "Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth

Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015"; and

c) Direct staff to notify affected local governments and appropriate agencies as per Metro

Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Section 6.4.2.

2. That the GVRD Board receive for information the report dated June 11, 2015, titled "Metro

Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Accepted Regional Context

. Statements".

FINANCIALIMPLICATIONS

There are no financial implications to this report.

OTHER IMPLICATIONS If the GVRD Board chooses Alternative 1, the proposed bylaw amendment will be initiated and

given initial readings, and staff will notify affected local governments and agencies to provide an

opportunity to offer comment. The proposed amendment bylaw would then be brought back to the

GVRD Board with any comments from the notification period for consideration of third and final

reading.

If the amendment bylaw receives initial readings by the GVRD Board, the proposed amendment will

be referred to all affected local governments and appropriate agencies for comment. The, minimum

notification period as identified in GVRD Regional Growth Strategy Procedures Bylaw No. 1148,

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 554

Page 10: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future Amendment to Reflect Accepted Regional Context Statements Regional Planning Committee Meeting Date: July 10, 2015

Page 4 of 4

2011, is 30 days, however in order to ensure that a reasonable opportunity is provided to respond,

the deadline for comments will be extended to September 16, 2015. The amendment notice will be

posted on the Metro Vancouver website. All comments received will be included in the report to

the GVRb Board in fall 2015, with opportunity to give third and final readings and adopt the

amendment bylaw.

If the GVRD Board chooses Alternative 2, the process for updating Metro 2040 to reflect Regional

Context Statements will not be initiated. The result is that accepted Regional Context Statements

and Metro 2040 will be inconsistent, which has no material effect as the accepted Regional Context-

Statements are legally binding. However, Metro 2040, as the publicly accessible and consolidated

record of the accepted RCSs, would not reflect the Board's,recent decisions.

SUMMARY / CONCLUSION

Since the adoption in July 2011 of Metro Vancouver 2040: Shaping our Future, the regional growth

strategy, 19 Regional Context Statements have been accepted (18 by the GVRD Board, and 1 by the

Province). The changes associated with the first 11 RCSs were accommodated in an amendment

bylaw adopted by the GVRD Board on May 23, 2014. Since then, an additional 7 RCSs have been

accepted by the GVRD Board, and one adopted by the Province of British Columbia. These recent

RCSs include revisions to the Metro 2040 land use designation maps, the addition of FTDAs and

local centres, and changes to population and employment projections that the GVRD Board deemed

to be 'generally consistent' with Metro 2040.

Staff recommends Alternative 1,'that the GVRD Board initiate the Type 3 Minor Amendment to

incorporate modifications to Metro 2040 required due to recently accepted Regional Context

Statements, give first and second reading to the amendment bylaw," and direct staff to notify

affected local governments.

Attachment: (Doc 11440167)

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015

11440160

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 555

Page 11: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

Attachment

GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRia

REGIONAL GROWTH STRATEGY AMENDMENT BYLAW NO. 1223, 2015

A Bylaw to Amend

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1135, 2010.

WHEREAS:

A. The Board of the Greater Vancouver Regional District adopted the Greater Vancouver Regional

District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1136, 2010 on July 29, 2011;

B. The Board has accepted a number of member municipalities' regional context statements that

contain maps that differ from the official regional land use designation maps maintained by the

Greater Vancouver Regional District;

C. The Board has accepted a number of member municipalities' regional context statements that

contain population, dwelling unit and employment projections that differ from those in Regional

Growth Strategy Appendix A, Table A.l: Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections for

Metro Vancouver Subregions and Municipalities;

D. The Board wishes to amend the Regional Growth Strategy .official regional land use designation

maps so that such maps are consistent with the maps included in accepted regional context

statements and amend Regional Growth Strategy Appendix A, Table A.l so that it is consistent with

projections included in accepted regional context statements;

E. In accordance with Regional Growth Strategy section 6.3.4 (h) and (i), any amendment to the

Regional Growth Strategy mapping that incorporates maps or projections included in an accepted

regional context statement is considered a Type 3 amendment;

NOW THEREFORE, the Board of the Greater Vancouver Regional District in open meeting assembled

enacts as follows:

1. The Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Bylaw No. 1136, 2010 is hereby

amended as follows:

a) the official regional land use designation maps number 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12 be revised to record the changes in regional land use designations within the City of Surrey that are set out in the

following table and are illustrated iri the maps contained in Schedule A:

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Gro^wth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 . Page 1 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 556

Page 12: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

REF# Area From

Designation To Designation Affected

Land Area

Regional Context Statement Acceptance

Date

1 Invergarry Park General Urban Conservation and Recreation

0.4 ha September 19, 2014

2, Bonaccord Creek Park General Urban Conservation and Recreation

0.5 ha September 19, 2014

3 Green Timbers Urban Forest General Urban Conservation and Recreation

4.3 ha September 19, 2014

4 Bear Creek Park General Urban Conservation and Recreation

1.1 ha September 19, 2014

5 Fleetwood Park General Urban Conservation and Recreation

14,2 ha September 19, 2014

6 Biackie Spit General Urban Conservation and • Recreation

0.9 ha September 19, 2014

7 The ALR boundary in the Elgin Heritage Park area

Conservation and Recreation

General Urban 5.6 ha Septemiber 19, 2014

8-The ALR boundary in the southern tip of the Nico-Wynd Golf Course

Agricultural General Urban 2.1 ha Septem.ber 19, 2014

9 Sunnyside Acres Urban Forest General Urban Conservation and Recreation

1.8 ha September 19, 2014

10 'Nuvo' live-work townhouse project in Rosemary Heights

Mixed Employment

General Urban 14.2 ha Septemiber 19, 2014

11 A portion of the 'Morgan Crossing' mixed-use project in Grandview Heights

Mixed Employment

General Urban .3.3 ha September 19, 2014

12 Redwood Park General Urban Conservation and Recreation

5.5 ha September 19, 2014

13 A portion of the South Newton / Panorama Ridge area

General Urban Agricultural 4.5 ha .. September 19, 2014

14 A portion of the South Newton / Panorama Ridge area

Agricultural General Urban 2.1 ha September 19, 2014

15 A portion of the South Westminster area

Industrial Mixed Employment

2.2 ha September 19, 2014

b) the official regional land use designation maps number 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 8, 11, and 12 be revised to record the changes in regional land use designations within the City of New Westminster that are set out in the following table and are illustrated in the maps contained in Schedule B:

REF« Area From

Designation To Designation Affected

Land Area

Regional Context Statement Acceptance

Date-

16 Foot of Boundary Road un-designated Conservation and Recreation

0.3 ha September 19, 2014

17_ Portion of 1085 Tanaka Court Industrial Mixed Employment

3.6 ha September 19, 2014

18 1050 Boyd Street General Urban Industrial 0.9 ha Septem.ber 19, 2014

19 Portion of 501 Boyd Street General Urban Industrial 4.2 ha Septemiber 19, 2014

20 505 Boyd Street (Water Lot) un-designated Industrial 5.3 ha Septem.ber 19, 2014

21 404 Salter Street General Urban Industrial 1.6 ha September 19, 2014

22 366 Brunette Avenue General Urban Industrial 0,2 ha Septemiber 19, 2014

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 2 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 557

Page 13: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

c) the official regional land use designation maps number 2, 3, A, 5, 6, 1, 8, 11, and 12 be revised to record the changes in regional land use designations within the City of Port Moody that are set out in the following table and are illustrated in the maps contained in Schedule C:

REF# Area From Designation To Designation

Affected

Land Area

Regional Context

Statement Acceptance

Date

23 Adjacent to Electoral Area A

Carrahclly Point

Conservation and

Recreation Rural 0.9 ha May 15, 2015

24 Fourth Avenue alignment Industrial General Urban 0.5 ha May 15, 2015

25 Laneways west of Bert Fiinn

Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 0.6 ha May 15, 2015

26 Right-of-way through Bert

Flinn Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 8.5 ha May 15, 2015

27 April Road and Parkside Drive

alignment General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 0.5 ha May 15, 2015

28

Addition of green space and

alignment of riparian area

north of Aspenwood Park

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 1.1 ha May 15, 2015

29

Green space alignment south

of Panorama Drive and

Aspenwood Park

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 1.8 ha May 15, 2015

30

Green space alignment along

David Ave and adjacent

riparian areas

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 6.7 ha May 15, 2015

31

Green space alignment south

of Chestnut Way and along

Cedarwood Drive

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 0.1 ha May 15, 2015

32

Green space alignment at

Heritage Mountain Blvd and

Turner Creek Dr •

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 0.5 ha May 15, 2015

33 Green space alignment west

of loco Rd and Mercier Rd General Urban

Conservation.and

Recreation 0.3 ha May 15, 2015

34

Green space alignment

northeast of loco Rd and

Kicking Horse Way

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 0.2 ha May 15, 2015

35 Green space alignment along

Heritage Mountain Blvd south General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 2.6 ha May 15, 2015

36

Green space alignment at the

ends of Beatrice Street Lane

and Pleasant Street Lane

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 0.1 ha May 15, 2015

37 Green space alignment along

Noons Creek Drive General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 1.0 ha May 15, 2015

38 Green space alignment at

Town Center Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation . 0.2 ha May 15, 2015

39

Removal offirehall and

adjacent areas at Newport

Drive west of loco Road

Conservation and

Recreation General Urban 1.2 ha May 15, 2015

40 Alignment of Sutter Brook

west of loco Road

Conservation and

Recreation General Urban . 2.6 ha May 15, 2015

41 Alignment of Sutter Brook

west of loco Road Genera! Urban

. Conservation and

Recreation 2.3 ha May 15, 2015

42

Rocky Point Park and Inlet

Park alignment along Murray

Street

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 3.3 ha May 15, 2015

43 Alignment at Esplanade Street

and Moody Street

Conservation and

: Recreation General Urban 0.1 ha May 15, 2015

44 Alignment along Esplanade St General Urban Industrial 0.7 ha May 15, 2015

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy/ Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 \ Page 3 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 558

Page 14: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

REF# Area From Designation To Designation

Affected

Land Area

Regional Context

Statement Acceptance

Date

45

Alignment along Barnett

Highway (south) and Vintner

Street

General Urban Industrial 5.5 ha May 15, 2015

45 Alignment of parks In

Gtenayre/College Park area General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 1.9 ha May 15, 2015

47 Alignment east of View Street Conservation and

Recreation General Urban 0,1 ha May 15, 2015

43

Alignment along Barnett

Highway (north) and rail right-

of-way

General Urban Industrial 9,8 ha May 15, 2015

49 Alignment along Glenayre

Drive General Urban Industrial 0.6 ha May 15, 2015

50

Alignment of parks off

Glencoe Drive and Weldon

Court

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 0.2 ha May 15, 2015

51 Alignment along northwest

side of Chines Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 0,5 ha May 15, 2015

52 Alignment along Kyle Street

Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 0,4 ha May 15, 2015

53

Alignment and addition of

green spaces north of Chines

Park

General Urban Conservation and

Recreation 1,1 ha May 15, 2015

. 54 Alignment along northeast

side of Chines Park General Urban

Consen/ation and

Recreation 0,6 ha May 15, 2015

55 Alignment at James Park and

Brookside Park General Urban

Conservation and

Recreation 0,3 ha May 15, 2015

d) the official regional growth strategy map number 4 Urban Centres and Frequent Transit Development Areas be deleted and replaced with the map contained in Schedule D, which illustrates the following additional Frequent Transit Development Areas:

Municipality REFff Map Additions Regional Context Statement

Acceptance Date

District of North

Vancouver

1 Add FTDA for Lower Lynn May 23, 2014 District of North

Vancouver 2 Add FTDA for Lower Capilano/Marine May 23, 2014

City of Surrey

3 Add FTDA for 104 Avenue September 19, 2014

City of Surrey 4 Add FTDA for Fleetwood West September 19, 2014 City of Surrey

5 Add FTDA for East Clayton September 19, 2014

City of North

Vancouver

6 Add FTDA for Marine Drive February 13, 2015 City of North

Vancouver 7 Add FTDA for East 3"^ Avenue Februan/ 13, 2015

City of Port Moody 8 Add FTDA for Moody Centre area May 15, 2015

Electoral Area A -

University of British

Columbia 9

Add FTDA for UBC Point Grey Campus Ministerial Order signed on June 2, 2015

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 4 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 559

Page 15: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

the official regional grov/th strategy map number II Local Centres be revised to record the Local Centres, Hospitals and Post-Secondary Institutions that are set out in the following table and are illustrated in the maps contained in Schedule E:

Municipality REF# Map Additions Regional Context Statement Acceptance Date

City of Coquitlam 1 Delete Ideal centres for Burquitlam and Lougheed (due to creation of FTDAs)

October 11, 2013

District of North Vancouver

2 Add local centres for Queensdale and Maplewood (identified as Village Centre on the RCS map, but not noted in the RCS staff report)

May 23, 2014

District of North Vancouver

^ 3 Delete local centres for Capiiano Marine and Lower Lynn (due to creation of FTDAs)

July 2011 and May 23, 2014

District of West Vancouver

4 Add local centres for Dundarave, Horseshoe Bay, Caulfeild, Park Royal

February 13, 2015

f)

2.

Table A.l: Population, Dwelling Unit and Employment Projections for Metro Vancouver Subregions

and Municipalities, contained in Appendix A of Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth

Strategy Bylaw No. 1136, 2010 is deleted and replaced with the Table A.l contained in Schedule F.

The official citation for this bylaw is "Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No, 1223, 2015." This bylaw may be cited as "Regional Growth Strategy

Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015."

Read a First time this

Read a Second time this

Read a Third time this

Passed and Finally Adopted this

day of _

day of

day of.

day of

,2015.

.,2015.

.,2015.

,2015.

Chris Plagnol Corporate Officer

Greg Moore Chair

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 5 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 560

Page 16: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SCHEDULE A - SURREY AMENDMENT REFERENCES

SURREY MAP 1 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 1-3

Greater Vancouver Regicnal District Regional Growth Strtitegj' iloiendntent Bylaw No. 1223, 20!3

Propcsed Oianjei 1. Invcfgarry ?»it (General Urban to Conservation and Receaoonj

2. Bonacccrd Oeek Park (General Urban to Conservation and Reereation)

3. Green Timbers Urban forest (General Urban to Conservation and Recreaticn) TSP

metrovancouver

Proposed Changes

1. GenersI Urban to Conservation and Recreation

jg 2, Ge.neral Urban to Conservation a.nd Racreation

Metro 2040 land Use Designations

ifi'l .11. 1 l?S® Consanvation General ' , -.•vr. Mixed - • . p—i Urban •vi Ajficultural RW , - u Industrial -titi , . .i Rural Ia ̂ uiJ & Recreation Urban -ivr Employment I ; Containment aoundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 201S Page 6 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 551

Page 17: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SURREY MAP 3 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES P 6-8

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Crowth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223.2015

Prcpoted Ountei 6. Siacide Spit IGeneral Urban to Ccraervatfon and .Recreation)

7 Tbwt ALA Soundary in Elgin Hetiage Park area IConsenratlon and Recreation to (Senenl Urban)

8. The ALR Soundary in the scotiver tip oi the NIco-Wyod Goif Course (Agricultural to General Urban)

Vl^ metfo Vancouver

Propoied Changes

g 5, Gonsnl Urban to Consonratlon and Recreation

Metro 204C Und Use Designations

Agricultural ^Industrial , I-sSii ^ i Recreation Urban "'A baa Employmem -aa

Urban Containment Scurcarv

SURREY MAP 4 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 9-H

Grtaar Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth strategy Amendment Bylaw No, 1223.2015

Proposed Changaa 9 Sunnyside Acres Urban forest (tSeneral Urban to Comervadcn and Retreabon)

10. 'Nuvo' live-wortt townhoute pro|ect in Rosemary Heights (Mbted Employment to General Urban)

11. A portion ol ttso 'Morgan Crossing' mixed-use proiect in Grandview Heights (Miird tmpioyment to GerreraJ Urban) .

lr«w<l

metro Vancouver

SA' 9. General Urban to Conserration and Recreation

;10, Mixed Employrrient to General •" Urben

;"'i 11. Mixed Eroplcyment to General Urban

• b 2B0 580 X ' l—J t t. I 1- A

.Metro 20C0 Land Use Deslgnatloni

§» • I 1 SSI Contaraatlcr, General T.;! , , ^ I" A^ncultural SM , , • Industrial , «] , a Recreation Urban -t ci

Mlied mploymen

I—I Urban u Connj-nment Soundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regionat Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 7 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 562

Page 18: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SURREY MAP 5 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES # 12

CrejLer Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Byiaw No. 1223, 2015

Proposed Oisnjej 12. Redwood Park IGeneral Urban to Corner/ation ar»d ReaptionI

metro Vancouver

Propcted Oianges

g 12. General Uriaen to Cranservation ^ and Recreation

•c.rn . . jrren Mmed T-."! - , I 1 Urban ,.'i Industrial ;iyfi :.Sn Rural .

Empkrymant ^ Comainmem Boundary

SURREY MAP 6 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES « 13-14

Greater Vancoitver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Byiaw No.-1223. 2015

Proposed Chanjaa 13 A portion of the South Newten / Panorama Ridje ansa (General Urban to Agricultural) ISA portion ol the South Newton / Pariorama Ridge area {Agricultural to General Urban)

P^<3

metrovancouver

Proposed Changes

^ 13. General Urban to Agricultural

•'' '• 14, Agricultural to General Urban

Metro 2040 Land Use Designations

j Conserraricn I i Recreation

Agrfcullura! General Urban

sC'j Mixed

.•;3 Employment Urban Containment Souncar/

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223., 2015 Page 8 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 563

Page 19: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SURREY MAP 7 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES # IS

Greater Vancouver Rrgionai Dlstrici Regional Crowih Strategy Ameroimcnt Uylaw No. 1223. 2015

Metro 1040 Land Uw Oeslgnstterrt a Connrvatlon i & Recreation minduan,! .

Urbin employment [ Ruril Urban

Containment Boundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 9 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 564

Page 20: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SCHEDULE B - NEW WESTMINSTER AMENDMENT REFERENCES

NEW WESTMINSTER MAP I • AMENDMENT REFERENCES « 16-21

Greater Vaarauver Regional District Regional Cronth Strategy Amertdmcnl Bylaw No. 1223.20IS Proposed OiengM 16. Foe? of Boundary Read (un-deslgnaied to Conseraarton and Recreadonl 1? Portion of JOBS Tanaka Court {Industrial to Mined Employmentl IB. lOSO Boyd Street (General Urban to industrial) 19. Portion of 501 Bovd Street (General Urban to industrial) 20. 505 Boyd Street Water Ltrt (Un-deiijnated to Industrial) 2L 404 Salter Street (tSeneral Urban to Industrial)

metrovancouver

Metro 20M Und Lite Oesianationi

-Stri ... , Conservation General " v , , , , iS:W Aencuitural _ -j industrial •vtS ° iffl & Reerearlon Urban • i' rta Wiied -3 I 1 Urban yii'B Employment j | Contalnmsnt Boundary

NEW WESTMINSTER MAP 2 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 22

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Crcrwtfi Strategy Arrtentiment Bylaw No 1 223. 201.S

Proposed Changas 22. 366 Brunette Avenue (General Urban to Industrial)

metrovancouver

Proposed Changes

'^1 22. General Urban to Indiijtrial

Metro 2040 Und Use Deslfnationi

-.:tt , • Consetvaticn General ^ , -m-j .Viiied . :t u ' i U'ben tj .igncuitural ... • . Industrial -.cN , , .Rural •iC! " sa S .Recreation Urban - employment I ^Containment Boundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Sylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 10 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 555

Page 21: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SCHEDULE C - PORT MOODY AMENDMENT REFERENCES

PORT MCCOY MAP 1 - AMENDMENT REFERENCE 23

Crsater Vancouver Regtona] Dlsuict Regional Growth Strategr Amendment ^aw No.! 223. 2015

Propovad Changei 23. Adjacent to Electoral Area A CarrahoDy Point (ContervaBon and SecreaBon to Rural)

metro Vancouver

^; Propojed Changea

' • '* 3 Conservation and Recreation " ' rl toRuni

-'i J 'V-

0 AS so ISO Metre* 1 t I t I I I. I I A

Metro 2040 Land Use Onigtutlon*

2553 . ^ Conservation General .rs) , • i Mi»«d -.rj, i 1 Urban Ag cu ra g, Rccreadon Urban " "* Emplovment --U 1 I Containment Boundafy

PORT MCODY MAP 2 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES « 24-27

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223.2013

Proposed Chantes 24 Fourth Ave aUgnment (Induttrtal to General Urban) 25, Lanewavs west of Bert Flfnn Park {General Urban to Conservation and Recreattcn) 26. RlgtiiKitway through Bert FUnn Park (General Urban to Comcfvadoo and Reaeailon) 27 April Road and Parkslde OrK« alignment (General Urban to Coniervatlcn and Recreation) metro Vancouver

Metro 2040 land Use Designations

I Conservation General I & Recreation Urban

Agricultural lament J H U Urban Containment ScuT.car/

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 11 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 556

Page 22: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOODY MAP 3 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES ff U-IS

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment 3yiavv No. 1223. 2015

gi Agricltur,! ^lilndunrUl mT'"f 4 ["1 5^ & RKrB»tlon UriMn ts-w Emolovmeni • «;! I |

Urban Containmem Boundary

PORT MOODY MAP 4 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 30-31

Grtatar Vancouvsr Regional District Regional Growth Strategy .Vocndrrient Bylaw No. 1223. 2015

P.roposad OiangM 3D Green space alignment along David Ave and adjacent riparian areac

{General Urban to Conservatron and Recreation)

31. Green space alignment south of Chestnut Way and along Cedarwsxsd Drive

IGeneral Urban to Conservaticn and Recrearton) metrovancou ,ier

Metro 2W0 Land Use Designations

j CorsservatSon I A Secreahon

Agriruitural •' - Iridusariai r-t j Mixed -Rura! I 1 EmplcytTient • ' ' I j Containment Bcundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 12 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 567

Page 23: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOODY MAP 5 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES # 32-34

Grtaar Vancouver Regional District Regional Grasvth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223. 2013

PropoHd ChangM 32. Green space alignment at Heritafle Mountain Slwd and Turner Creei Dt

(General Urban to Conser/atfcn and Recreation)

33. Green space allgrment west of loco Rd and Mercier Rd (General Urban to Conaervadon and Recreation)

34. Green space allgrment ncnheait of loco Rd and Cckirg Horse Way (General Urban to Conservation and Recreibon)

<gg» mstrovancouver

Metro 2040 Und Use OMignstioni

.Agricultural Conservation Geneni r-jj; (nj^jt^lal :?13 7^ Rural I i 1 Recreation Urban '^71 Employmertt t-iJ! I I Contalnmant Boundary

PORT MOODY MA? 6 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 3S-37

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223. 2015

Proposed Changes 35. Green space alignment along Heritage Mountain Blvd south

(General Urban to Conservation and Reaeation) 36. Green space alignment at the ends of Beatrice Street Lane and Pleasant Street lane

(General Urban to Conservaticn and Recreation) 37 Green space alignment along Noons&ee* Drive

(General Urban to Conservation and Recreation) '

•c^ir metrovancouver

'ropoied Changes

35, General Urban to Censervacicn and Recreation

36, General Urban to Conservation and Recreation

37, General Urban to Conservation and Recreation

Metro 2040 Land Use Desiftiationj

, ssnsi Ccnservariori' General • ' ; , . . , -r--> Mixed ; 1 Urban vw Agricultural 'fSm , _ i industrial ; Rural I i_ . a ..

-,f3 2^ i Recreation Urttan -U cmo-oymant .| | Containment Bcundanr

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 13 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 568

Page 24: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOODY MAP 7 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES 3 3S-39

Grsacer Vancau'ver Kogional District Regioiial Gccwth Stratej*-Amsixiincnt 3y1aw No. 1123, 20 ii

Proposed OtingM 38. Gr«n space aligrtrr.ent at Town Center Parte

{General Urtjan to Cofiserratlcn and .3ecreacor.l

39. Oensowl of fifehall and adjacent areas at Newport Drive west a( loco Road (Comervarion and Reaeation So General Urban)

S»v,<3

metrovancouver

Metro 20U Und Use Oeilgnatlons

Asrtcultoral S| & Recreation

General Rural f-) a a ' Urban .cd Emptcvmervt ~..-e | j Conoinmam Soundary

PORT MOODY MAP 8 - AMENDMENT REFERENCES 3 30-41

Greater Vancouver ttcgional District Regional Growth Strategy Antendmem Hylaw No. 1223. 2013

Proposed Changes 40 Alignment of Suner Brook west ol loco Road

(Conservatien and RaNireabcn to General Urban!

41. Alignment of Suder Brook west of loco Scad

(General Urban to Conservioon and Recreation)

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 14 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 569

Page 25: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOODY MAP 9 - AMENDMENT REf ERENCES ii 42-44

Greater Vancouver Reglona! District RegionaJ Growth Strategy Amsndnnent B)1aw No, 1223,20IS

Proposod Ottngsi 42. Rocky Point Part arxj lr,i« Part lilfnment along Murray Street

(General Urban to Conservation arxi Recreation)

43. Aligntnent at ciolanade Street and Mcxxiy Street (Ccnservadon and Secreitlon to General Urban)

44. Alignment along Esplanade Street (General Urban to Industrial)

(Xsoe

metrovancouver

i

Prtjpoied Changes

42, Genaral Urban to Consanrabon and aecraation

r43, Conservaticn and Recreation to General Urban

[\k 44. General Urban to Industrial

i LdJ I I I I I 1 r Metro 2040 Land Use Designationi

rgia ...J I. _I Conjervinon General ^ , EvC5o..^i I 1 Uthan tS ̂ g, Recreation Urban 5® Eroployment iuS I ' 1 Containment Boundary

Prtiposed Changes

ijj 43. General Urban to Industrial

46. General Urban to Conservation and Recrsatkin

; 47. Conservation and Hacroation to ' Genaral Urban

1) 4S. General Urban to Industrial

PORT MOODY MAP 10-AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 45-43

Greater Vancouver Regional District Re- ' glonal Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No, 1223! 201S

ProsKssed Changes 45. Alignment along Samett Highway jsouthl and Vintner Street 46. Alignment ol parks in Glenayre/College Park area

47. Alignment east o< View Street 48. Alignment along iametl Highway (north) and rati right-oi-way

metrovancouver

Metro 2040 Land Use Deslgnationi

I Conservation I i Recreation

Agricultural Gene.al Urban -.iii Emplovment .-ti'| | Containment Soundarv

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015

Page 15 of 21 Greater Vancouver Regional District - 570

Page 26: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOOOY MAP 11 - AMSNOMENT REFERENCES » 49-50

Grescsr Vancouver Regional District Regional Cra-.vth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223.2015

Proposed Oisngw 15, -Alignment along Glenjryte Orlve

(General Urban So indvKrtal) 5C Allg.nment of parks eft Gtencoe Drive and Weldt^rr Crrurt

(General Urban to tjjnservatfon and Recteadon) metro vancrjuver

• ^ Proposed Changes

- ' . . • .• I'j 49. Gene.-al Urtsan to indoitriai

.y: • • • " •Ij Q 50. Gsneral Urban to Conservaiicfi ivi 1.. and Recreation

Metro 2040 Land Use Deslgnationt

I Conservation I £ Recreation

jsljj Agricultural -S Industrial fcl -n j 1 uroan Urban vW ifid EmploYrnem •—.B | | Containment Boundary

PORT MOODY MAP 12 • AMENDMENT REFERENCES » Sl-53

Greater Vanrtouver Regional District Regional Growth Sfmlegy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223. 2015

Proposed Changes 51. Alignment along rcruhwest side of (Diines Park

. (General Urban to Conservation ants Recreation)

Si Alignment jitmg Ptyle Sueet Patk (General Uifaan to tusnservarion and Recreadcnj

53. Alignment and addition of green spaces north cf Chines Park (General Urban to Conservation and Recreation)

*^<3

metro Vancouver

Metro 2040 Land Use Designations

rn-i ... , Conservation ••fvJ Agntultural . vita g£d i Recreation

General —j Urban • b

'•F» I , Rural i j nibJ cmployrTierrt —> j !

Urban Containment Ecundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Grovirth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 16 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 571

Page 27: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

PORT MOODY MAP 13- AMENDMENT REFERENCES » 54-55

Crcjlsr Vancouver Reglona! Disula Regional Growth Strategv Amenilment Bylaw No. 1223. 2013

PropoMd Ch*n<« 54. Alignment alcng northeast siBe of Giines Part

IGenenI Urban to Conservation and .Recreation)

55. Alignment II James Part and 3rookside Paik {General Urban to ConservaSon and Recreabon) metfovanctjuver

Metro 2040 Land Use DesJcnatiani uesicnaooni

rra ... , !S!S Conservation General , , . , rtrj Mixed -.-v . • . Urisan ^£'1 Agricultural Ba • "i Industrial ;S! . . Rural L. n j

& Recreation Urtian • » ;A.is Employment •-sr.'! ^ Containment Boundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 17 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 572

Page 28: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SCHEDULE D- FREQUENT TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT AREAS

I Uatropoilnti Surr^ M«<ro ^ Rtglanil 0 MunlclptI ^ Tf«n«U • Urtan Coniainriatrt Bcundary I C»I» C»«itr« City C«ntr«t Town Ctntrn ^ Drwiopmtm 1

» '' Gansral Urtian • Tr*r«t DroveftiwMfw*** trf mowi •• rffW* n iaca«Bi»

Macro aouM«ry

Uun;olpat Soundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 18 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 573

Page 29: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

SCHEDULE E - LOCAL CENTRES, HOSPITALS AND POST SECONDARY INSTITUTIONS

COQUITLAM LOCAL CENTRES- REFERENCE #1

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Eyiaw No. 1223, 2015

Proposed Chenjes 1. Deiete Local Centrei at BurquHla-m and lou{he«d [due to creatjon of FTDAai

tnelrovancouver

Metro 204OLand UM Designations

M-a ... , I5E3 ConservsRon Genanil . . . iT-.i -Mixed - , > 1 Urban jisjj Agnculttiral Baa . _ • '-a Industrial '.lea , , 4 Rural , ~ . tSSi S3 & Recreation Urban "iea EmploYinent t r-? ^ Containment Boundary

NORTH VANCOUVER OlSTRtCT LOCAL CENTRES- REFERENCES <»Z-3

Greater Vancouver Regional Dlstrla Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223. 2015

Proposed Changuj 2. Add Local Ctmres for Queensdale and Maplewood {idenofled as Vlllaje Cenue on the RCS map) 3 Delete Local Centres fcr Lower Capiteno Varine and Lower Lvrn {due to c.-eatton of FTBAs)

metro vancoirver

Metro 20d0tand Use Designations

-rti „ • u • Conservation M Agncuhurai B%i , .

•sid Stda i .necreattcn --Industrial 31

U.'ban tmolCY^em V w , t—-1 Urban •^Rursi

I J CcntarnfT^om Souncarv

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 19 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 574

Page 30: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

WEST VANCOUVER LOCAL CENTRES- REFERENCE HA

Greatsr Vancoirwr Regjor-al District Hsgional Growth Strategy Amendment Byiaw No. 1223,2015

Metro JMO Land Uw Detlgnrtlorij

Corisen»-8don General r f.>, . . . Mixed - , p——i Urban •^Agricultural ^ ^ tndustral Rural ^

icOJ 2^ S Kecreanon Uroan •••^' Employment | Contamrrvent Boundary

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015 Page 20 of 21

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 575

Page 31: Coouitlam For Council · Burquitlam is a housekeeping change since this corridor had already been • redesignated as a Frequent Transit Development Area in the RGS). Staff recommend

GVRD On Table Replacement Page 576 Item G 1.1 Schedule F

SCHEDULE F - TABLE A.l: POPULATION, DWELLING UNIT AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS FOR

METRO VANCOUVER SUBREGIONS AND MUNICIPALITIES

|iS^lrffiviM«ouwSfoS^^SSr2.35C^ W:^,i^a:aW '3'443'Ml EiTm.oai! ftrMow, fllCABW'U 'ilraEL'Mbs i ! i 1 ! i i 1

J BLtmacv. New Westminster 295,COO 350,000i 406.000 i 447,000 117,4001 154.900 1 173.600 196.300 169,600 189.000 1 233,000 i 251,000)

1 Bumabv 227.700 270.00C' i 314,000 i 345,000 86,800 ! 117,800 I 136,000 149,X'O 140,900 152,-XO i 189.000 1 203. DOG 1 ; New VVestminster 67,300 30.000 1 92.000 •' 102,000 1 30,600 ! 37.100 ; 42,600 47,000 23.700 : 37,000 : 44,000 48,XO i Langtev City, Lanqtey Township 131,900 174,140 i 220,150 i "249.000 1 48,600 1 65.800 1 '*85,366' ~"'96,8O6* ZO.'POO' r'szoooj 'Tio.ooo 125.000 j ; LangleyCitv | 25,600 30,140 1 34,150 ; 38,000 1 11.300 1 13,800 ' 16,300 ! 18,300 13.000 ! 21,000 i 23,000 25.000!

Langley Township i 106,300 144,000 1 186,1300 1 211,000 ! 37.300 i 52,COO ; 59,COO 76.000'' 52,500 71C'-X: 87,000 1X.C00 i Mapte Ridpe. Pitt Kteadows i 95900 107,600 ! 122300 1 141,5001 34.800 ' 44,200 : 52.900 55700 29.100 1 43.000! 51.200 53:700 i

Nfepfe Ridgs i : 77.600 : 87.600 i 100,300 1 118,000 i 28,'300 : 1 36,100 ; 43,7i3G I 45,.X-C 23.3CO 1 34.-000: 41,C0G 42,5X : Prtt Vteadows 1 18,300 ! 20.000 I 22.000 , 23,500 I 6,300 8,100 : 9,200 i ; 10,200 5,300 i 9,000 i 10.200 11,2M ;

Ncrtiaast Sectw ! 222.900 289.400 i 341100 r 363,900 ! 1 79,595 110.150 S 136,130 i 1 149,340 79,625 i 108.550 i 129,490 141,520 i Anmore 2,100 1 L 2,900 3,400 ! 3,900 i i 620 1 930 i 1,130 j 1.350 ! 300 500 ; 600 700 t Belcarra ! 1 700! 800 900 ; 1.000 j 275 i 320 ; 350 390 ! 225 250 ! 290 ax Coquidam ; 129,000! 176.000 213.000 i 224,000 1 45,500 i 57700; 86,700 ! 94,100 48,8CO 70,DX : . 86,000 94,CCO Port Coauitlam 57.500 ! i 70.000 79,000 i 35.000 I 20.ECO i 26.300 i 30,900 i 34.300'' 23.600 28.KO ; 32,000 35.COO Port tvfeody 33,600 i 39.7CO 44,300 ! 50.000 ' 12,600 ! 14.900 ! 17,000 19,200 6,900 9.BX: 10.600 j 11 560

Ncxtft Shore 1 185,100 i 206,425 ! 224,650 i 243700 ' 73,200 i M,30d 1 . 92,775! 166.450! 78.400 91,350! m460' j 109,570 North Vancouver City i 49.800 56,000 1 62,000 : 68,000 23,000 25,600 j 28,000 30,200 1 31,100 34,000 i 37.000 i 4C,XC 1 North Vancouver District •• "BrToo" S8.000 1 105,000 i 114.000 31,300 37.500 ' 41,000 45,0C-O 1 28,300 33,C<X) 1 36.K0 1 40.000 i West Vancouver 46,300 51,000 1 56,000 ^ 60,000 18.400 20,600 i 23.100 24,500 18.700 24.000; 27,000 i 29.COO ! Uons Bay 1 1.300 1,425 j 1.650 ; 1,700 500 ' 600 1 575 ! 750 300 350 ' 450 570 :

Delta, Richmond, Tsawwassen 1 296,900 [ 344.000! 380,000 : 409,500 i 103,100 ! 125,300 ! 142,900 i 161.100 178750 210,200 : 233:400 252,5CO i Delta i 101,900 i 110,COO' 116,000 121,000 1 34.800 ; 39,000 i 41,iOOO ! 44,000 49,900 62,000 • 67,000 7I.QOO i Richmond i 194.300 i 230,000 258,000 i 280,000 1 58,000 1 35.000 ; 100,000 1 115,000 128,600 147.000 ; 165.DOO ! 180.CO0 i Tsawwassen First Nation 700 L 4.000 ' 5.000 ; 8.500 300 ! 1.300 ; 1.900 i 2.TD0 250 1.200 1 1400 1 1 500 i

Surrey. White .Rock 497.500 r 614,500 r 707,000 i 793.500 162.300 ! 211 000 i 251,000 i 288,000 175,200 221 800 • 266:400 [ 308,300 1 . Surrey 477.800 594.000 635.000 ' 770.0QO 152,500 i 200 COO i 239,0-30 1 275.000 i 168.200 1 214,COO . 258.000 i" 297..X0I

Whrte Rock 19,700 20.500 22.000 23.500 9,900 i 11,000 : 12,000 13.C-00 i 7.000 1 7.SQ0 8,400 i 9.3X Vancouver. Eiectora! Area A 630,500 f i— 702,000 1 750,000 ! 795.000 " 270,256 1 315i'266'j 347,000 376^ *727760* 46i8,d66'l "502^606 ! 533,000

Vancouver i 617.200 585 000 i 725.000 ' 765,000 ! 265.1 CO 1*309.0001 338J>3 II.OOQ"'

38*2i600 1 14.000

4C€,700 446.coo 1 477,000 1 505.000 Electoral .Area A uec ue_ ai>»i 13,3001 17.COO 1 25,00Ci . SO.O'DO 1 5.150 T 7,2CO

338J>3 II.OOQ"'

38*2i600 1 14.000 21X00 !' 22,GC0~ 25,XO i 23.'300

1. G.-ow;n projertionsare provided as reference to member municipalities and regional agencies, ana do not represent specific growth targets for the region or

respeaive municipair.ios

I Figures for the year 2Q11 are based cn Census of Canada 2011, Poouiation andernplcymem figures include a 2011 Census undercount esti,-naleas calculated post Census by Statistics Canada. 3. The projections are prepared by Metro Vancouver in association with member municioaiitics- Prcjeaicns for each of the munidpalities are ta'sen from respeaive municipal RegionalConte.n Statements as accepted by the GVRD Board, i. Ail projections represent anappro.imate figure for the given year, with consideration for potential variance within a high and low growth margin. Particular

municipal projections may represent s higher or lower estimate within that margin. Metro Vancouver may apply aiternati-ve higher or lower regional and munlcioal projection estimates in prepan.ng pianningscena.hDS for land use, infrastructure, utilities or other purposes. 5. All figures in this table are rounded and may incJude minor inconsistEncies for sun,-nary totais,

5. All mur.idpai totals, with the escepfionof TsawwassenFi.-st Nation, include the iotaisforanyrirst Nation communities located within the respectivi; mumcipal boundany.

11440167

Greater Vancouver Regional District Regional Growth Strategy Amendment Bylaw No. 1223, 2015

Greater Vancouver Regional District - 576 Replacement Page 21 of 21


Recommended