CORE0101 Oper Risk Mgt Assessment

8/3/2019 CORE0101 Oper Risk Mgt Assessment

1/42

1

OPERATIONAL RISK

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT

OPERATIONAL RISK

MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT

CORE0101CORE0101


2/42

OVERVIEWOVERVIEW Background,

Definitions and terms,

Purposes and goals,

Why we use ORM,

Five step ORM process,

Three levels of applying ORM, Principles of the ORM process,

Responsibilities of implementing.


3/42

ORM BACKGROUNDORM BACKGROUND Originally developed to improve safety.

Adopted by Army.

ORM was implemented in Marine Corps.


4/42

ORM BACKGROUNDORM BACKGROUNDALMAR 210/97 states.

Commanders Shall Incorporate ORM:Crisis action

Exercise planning

Commanders intent

Discussion at decision briefs


5/42

DEFINITION OF OPERATION

RISK MANAGEMENT


RISK MANAGEMENT Process of Dealing With Risk Associated

With Military Operations.

Is Decision Making Tool.

Effective Tool for Maintaining Readiness


6/42


RISK MANAGEMENT


RISK MANAGEMENT Not Just an S-3 or S-4 Function.

Force Reductions.

Moral Responsibility.


7/42

PURPOSE & GOAL OF THE

ORM PROCESS

PURPOSE & GOAL OF THE

ORM PROCESS Purpose:

Minimize risk.

Goal:

Manage risk so mission can be accomplished.


8/42

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS? To prevent Unnecessary losses.

Common mishap causes:Individual failure.

Support failure .

Leader failure.Training failure.

Standards failure.


9/42

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?Mishap injuriesReported USMC Ground mishap injuries during FY 1991-1999

Category Marine

Mishaps 14,049

Fatalities 962

Permanent Total Disability 111

Permanent Partial Disability 364

Lost Time Injury (1 + days) 14,046

Hospital Days 22,946

Lost Days (Non-Hospital) 95,568

NOTE: Marine includes Sailors & Soldiers attached to Marine Corps units. Table doesNOT include light duty or follow-up treatment. Statistics include on and off dutymishaps.


10/42

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?Mishap costs

Reported USMC Ground mishap dollar costs during FY 1994-99

Category Total

Injury and Fatality Cost $188,700,836

Property Damage $30,073,474

Injury and FatalityPlus

Property Damage$218,774,310


11/42

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?Combat losses

WWII

1942-45

Korea

1950-53

Vietnam

1965-72

DS/DS

1990-91

Mishaps 56% 44% 54% 75%

Friendly

Fire

1% 1% 1% 5%

EnemyAction

43% 55% 45% 20%


12/42

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS?

WHY USE THE ORM

PROCESS? Weve always done it!

The risk and degree of success has varieddepending on level of training and experience.

Different evaluation of course of action.

Mission GO/NO GO criteria Mission/confirmation briefings

Common sense


13/42

WHY USE THE ORMPROCESS?


Traditional versus ORM approach to managing risk

Traditional ORM

Random, Individual Dependent Systematic

Common Sense Methodical

Uninformed Decision Informed Decision

Can do regardless of risk Conscious decision based on

risk vs. benefitCompliance Based Involvement & Empowerment

Reactive Proactive


14/42



Two Goals of Leadership.

Leadership failures contribute to unnecessarymishaps causes.

If principles of ORM taught and effectively

applied.


15/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Hazard

Condition with the potential to cause.

Cause

Produces effect, result, or consequence.


16/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Hazard versus cause

Method of clarifying if hazard or cause.

If more specific causes are not identified.

Hazard at one echelon may be a Cause at

another echelon.


17/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS

Risk

Expression of possible loss in terms Severity

and probability.

Risk Assessment

Detecting hazards/assessing associatedrisks.


18/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Severity

Expected consequence of an event

ControlsActions to eliminate hazards, or reduce their

risk.


19/42

Three types of control

Engineering.

Administrative.

Personal protective equipment.

ORM TERMSORM TERMS


20/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Engineering

Design, material selection, or substitution.

Usually eliminate hazard.

May not be technically/economically feasible.


21/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Administrative

Specific administrative actions.

Train Marines recognize hazards.

Limit number exposure to a hazard.

Effective in reducing risk when used properly


22/42

ORM TERMSORM TERMS Personal Protective Equipment

Serves as a barrier.

Least effective type of control.

Used when other controls do not reduce

risk to an acceptable level.


23/42

FIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORMFIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORM 5-step Process

Identify hazards

Assess hazards

Make risk decisions

Implement controls

Supervise


24/42

Identify Hazards

Begins by conducting Operationalanalysis.

List major steps of the Operation.

Preliminary hazard analysis:

List all hazards

List all possible causes

FIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORMFIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORM


25/42

Assess Hazards

Degree of risk identifiedDetermine in terms of Severity and Probability

Risk assessment matrix (RAC)

Provides consistent framework

Show comparison of perceived risk

Prioritizes hazards

FIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORMFIVE STEP PROCESS OF ORM


26/42

RISK ASSESSMENT CODE

MATRIX


MATRIXRisk Assessment Code Mishap Probability

1 - CRITICAL Frequent Likely Occasional Unlikely

2 - SERIOUS AB

C D3 - MODERATE

4 - MINOR

5 - NEGLIGABLE

Hazard Catastrophic - I 1 1 2 3

Severity Critical - II 1 2 3 4Marginal III 2 3 4 5

Negligible - IV 3 4 5 5


27/42

Determine Hazard Severity:

Catastrophic I

Critical II

Marginal III

Negligible IV


(RAC)


(RAC)


28/42

Determine Mishap Probability:

Frequent A

Likely B

Occasional C

Unlikely D


(RAC)


(RAC)


29/42

Determine Risk Assessment Code:

Critical 1

Serious 2

Moderate 3

Minor 4

Negligible 5


(RAC)


(RAC)


30/42


(RAC)


(RAC) Make Risk Decisions

Develop controls for each hazard.

Controls developed for most serious hazards first.

Determine residual risk.

Make risk decisions.

Accept risk.

Communicate with higher authority.


31/42

RISK ASSESSMENT CODE(RAC)

RISK ASSESSMENT CODE(RAC)

Implement Controls

Engineering, administrative, and/or personal protective

equipment

Incorporate selected controls:

SOP, LOI, orders, briefs, training, rehearsals

Communicate selected controls to lowest level:

Who will do what by when?


32/42


(RAC)


(RAC) Supervise

Enforce standards and controls: Ensure Marines are performing tasks to standard.

Ensure controls are in place.

Take corrective action.

Remain alert for changes/unexpected

developments.


33/42


(RAC)


(RAC)ORM in BAMCIS

BAMCIS ORM

Begin Planning Identify Hazards

Arrange Recon

Make Recon Assess the Hazards

Complete the Plan Make Risk Decisions

Issue the Order Implement Controls

Supervise Supervise


34/42

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM Commanders determine which level based

on time available, proficiency, and assets.

Time Critical

Deliberate

In-Depth


35/42

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM Time Critical ORM

On-the-run mental/oral review.

Not recorded on paper.

Normally applied in execution phase.

Unexpected events and changes.


36/42

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM Deliberate ORM

Application of complete 5 step process.

Recorded on paper.

Applied in planning operations.

Used for evaluating SOPs, training,

maintenance procedures, damage control.


37/42

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM

THREE LEVELS OF

APPLYING ORM In-depth ORM

More detailed risk assessment.

Advanced tools.

Professional expertise needed.

Used in long term planning.

Complex operations.

Introducing new equipment, tactics, or training curriculum.


38/42

PRINCIPLES OF THE

ORM PROCESS

PRINCIPLES OF THE

ORM PROCESS Accept Risk When Benefits Outweigh the Cost

Accept No Unnecessary Risk

Anticipate and Manage Risk by Planning

Make Risk Decisions at the Right Level


39/42

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM Unit commanders

Provide ORM training.

Incorporate into briefs, notices, and written plans.

Risk assessment for all new/complex evolutions.

Address ORM.

Safety, training, and lessons learned reports.


40/42

SNCOs

Most experience/subject matter experts.

Active role in identifying hazards/appropriate

controls.

Supervision/enforcement of standards.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM


41/42

NCOs

First line of supervision

Make risk decisions daily

Individual MarineSelf-supervision (self-discipline)

Perform assigned tasks to standard

Recognize unsafe acts/conditions

Take corrective action or report discrepancies

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM

RESPONSIBILITIES OF

IMPLEMENTING ORM


42/42

42

QuestionsQuestions???

Date post:	06-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	tyler-frederick
View:	219 times
Download:	0 times

CORE0101 Oper Risk Mgt Assessment

Documents