Date post: | 24-Jan-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | environmentalconflicts |
View: | 488 times |
Download: | 1 times |
1
The material and energetic
basis of social systemsAn introduction
Simron Jit Singh
Institute of Social EcologyKlagenfurt University, Austria
Why analyse material and energy flows?
Materials and energy are biophysical categories necessary for
human survival and reproduction
They are finite both in terms of availability and productivity
Patterns of material and energy use (in both quantitative and
qualitative terms) affect the future survival of humans and
other species
The world is presently experiencing an unprecedented
environment crisis due to the ways we consume our
resources (materials, energy, land) causing sustainability
problems on the input side (scarcity) and the output side
(pollution)
This has also had social consequences in terms of resource
distributional conflicts and environmental justice
2
Material and Energy Flow Analysis - MEFA
MEFA is an analytical method that allows to:
Analyse the quantity and quality of resources extracted from
nature and their passing through processing, transport, final
consumption and disposal
Understand the spatial dimension of material flows (where extraction, production, consumption and disposal takes
place)
Interpret the impact of these flows within the framework of
sustainability science and ecological economics
Relate these flows to ecological distributional conflicts and embedded power relations (political ecology)
The environmental problems (some
would say crisis) we face today are a
consequence of the ways society
interacts with nature
Doing a MEFA involves a number of “wicked” decisions, as
analytical categories come in conflict with ontological ones (as
do semiotics). Let us take for example this statement:
3
culturalsphereof causation
natu
rals
pher
eof
cau
satio
n
Adapted from:
Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999
“Society as hybrid between material
and symbolic worlds”
metabolism
Material world
Adapted from:
Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999
labour/technology
“Society as hybrid between material
and symbolic worlds”
4
communication,
Adapted from:
Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999
metabolism
natu
rals
pher
eof
cau
satio
n culturalsphereof causation
Material worldHuman Society
labour/technology Shared meaning &
understanding
“Society as hybrid between material
and symbolic worlds”
The Two Types of Metabolism
5
Operationalising Material Flow Accounting
Stocks
EconomicProcessing
DEDPO
Imports Exports
Immigrants Emigrants
Air,
WaterWater
Vapour
Domestic environment
Stocks
EconomicProcessing
DEDPO
Imports Exports
Immigrants Emigrants
Air,
WaterWater
Vapour
Problem 1: What belongs to society
and what belongs to nature?
Labour as a determining factor
� Humans (what about seasonal migration, tourists)
� Livestock
� Infrastructure and artefacts (buildings, streets, dams,
electricity grids, etc.)
The only exception is agricultural fields, even though they
are reproduced by human labour!!
6
Stocks
EconomicProcessing
DEDPO
Imports Exports
Immigrants Emigrants
Air,
WaterWater
Vapour
Problem 2: How to define a social system’s domestic territory to differentiate between
domestic flows and imports?
Legitimate right
� To exploit the resources within a territory, either
through traditional or legal control
� Where existing political and governing institutions
have the ability to set and sanction standards of social
behaviour within that territory
The difficult of a strict systems boundary, particularly in
local rural systems where there are overlaps in land
use with neighbours
Stocks
EconomicProcessing
DEDPO
Imports Exports
Immigrants Emigrants
Air,
WaterWater
Vapour
Problem 3: How to account for
externalities or hidden flows?
Flows are accounted for as ‘weight at border’
� All materials that are economically valued are considered
as ‘direct’ inputs, but not, for e.g. earth removed for
construction or used in ploughing, or dredging.
� What about the ‘hidden flows’ or ‘ecological rucksacks’
that occur during extraction, processing or disposal of
resources where these activities take place?
� For e.g. a ton of aluminum requires 9 tons of raw
materials, 3 tons of water and 200 GJ of energy!
� How to account for these externalities?
Total Material Flow (TMR); Raw Material Equivalent (RME); a
political issue!!
7
Inclusiveness or exclusiveness of material flows
If all materials, then water and air make up to 85-90% of the total?
Most studies would not lump water, air and other materials (biomass, fuels,
minerals) so as not to drown economically valued materials in water and
air; so they are kept separate for their sheer amount, as and also
supposedly low impact of their use (toxicity);
But this is changing with many studies quantify the use of water and its
ecological and social impacts, including severe conflicts over its access;
Studies on water footprint of products, embodied water, debating on what
should be produced where depending on water situation, etc.
8
� Socioeconomic metabolism is an interdisciplinary
effort integrating concepts from social and natural sciences
to describe the biophysical relations of society-nature
interactions
� The operating instrument for socio-economic metabolism is
Material and Energy Flow Accounting (MEFA)
� Consistent with the systems approach, national MFA is a
physical accounting method that provides an aggregate
overview, in tonnes, of annual material inputs and outputs
of an economy.
� Its interpretative strength can be greatly enhanced by
historical and institutional narratives
MFA: Conceptual and Methodological options
Frame of reference / unit of analysis: (a) seen from a social science
perspective, the unit of analysis could be the socioeconomic system,
treating it like an organism or sophisticated machine, or (b) the
ecosystem, seen from a natural science perspective, with mutual
feedback loops.
Reference system: Global, national, regional (city or watershed or village),
functional (firm, household, economic sector), temporal (various modes
of subsistence, social formations, historical systems)
Flows under consideration: total turnover of materials, energy or both; one
may select certain flows of materials or chemical substances (inputs or
outputs) for reasons of availability in the reference ecosystem, or to look
at the rates of consumption.
9
Map of materials of particular interest for accounting
Source: Steurer 1996
Related policy response:
Small volume with high impact:
policy directed on pollution
control, bans, substitutions, etc.
Medium volume focuses on
policy at reducing materials and
energy intensity or production,
minimization of wastes and
emissions, closing loops
through recycling
High volume flows, policy
objectives will be concerned
with depletion of natural
resources, disruption of habitats
during extractions.
Some theoretical and empiricalapplications of MEFA
10
1. Characteristic metabolic profiles and transitions across scales and
production regimes
Composition of materials input (DMC)
material input EU15 (tonnes, in %)
Biomass
construction minerals
industr.minerals
fossil fuels
total: 17 tonnes/cap*y
source: EUROSTAT 2003
11
Composition of DPO: Wastes and emissions(outflows)
D PO t o air ( C O2 )
D PO t o air*
D PO t o land ( wast e)
D PO t o land ( d issipat ive use)
D PO t o wat er
Source: WRI et al., 2000; own calculations
unweighted means of DPO per capita for
A, G, J, NL, US; metric tons
DPO total: 16 tons per capita
Metabolic profiles of the agrarian and industrial regime:
transition = explosion
Agrarian Industrial Factor
Energy use (DEC) per capita [GJ/cap] 40-70 150-400 3-5
Material use (DMC) per capita [t/cap] 3-6 15-25 3-5
Population density [cap/km²] <40 < 400 3-10
Agricultural population [%] >80% <10% 0.1
Energy use (DEC) per area [GJ/ha] <30 < 600 10-30
Material use (DMC) per area [t/ha] <2 < 50 10-30
Biomass (share of DEC) [%] >95 10-30 0.1-0.3
Source: Social Ecology DB
12
Domestic Material Consumption / cap in EU Countries, 2000
Source: Weisz et al. 2006
Global material use 1900 – 2005 (DMC = DE)
Source: Krausmann et al. 2009
Total material use (Gigatons / year) Metabolic rate (tons / cap / year)
13
India: Domestic Material Consumption (DMC) total tons I tons per capita
Source: Lanz 2008
-
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2.000.000
2.500.000
3.000.000
3.500.000
4.000.000
4.500.000
5.000.000
1961
1964
1967
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
1000t
Construction
mineralsOres and non
metallic mineralsFossil fuels
Biomass
-
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
1961
1964
1967
1970
1973
1976
1979
1982
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
t/cap
Construction
mineralsOres and non
metallic mineralsFossil fuels
Biomass
2. Dematerialization or shiftingenvironmental burdens from north to south
14
� Meadows et al. (1972) argued that economic growth would
have to be stalled in order to remain within the earth’s
carrying capacity
� As opposed to Meadows, Ayres and Kneese’s solution was
more subtle and acceptable to economists…it was not
economic growth that mattered but the growth in the material
throughput of human societies that was significant.
15
16
Problem shifting via international division of labor
Raw material --> semi-/products --
>
use disposal
Value
added
Mass
Developed countriesdeveloping
Ma
teri
al M
on
ey
100%
0%
Unequal distribution of global resources (for the year 2000)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
S hare o f popu la tion S ha re o f te rrito ry S ha re o f G D P
D - Ld - ow
D - Ld - nw
D - H d
I - Ld - ow
I - Ld - nw
I - H d
Slide courtesy: Fischer-Kowalski and colleagues
17
3. Relating material and energyflows with conflicts
• Cities require large inputs of material and energy resources, but they have very littleproductive land of their own; theydepend on hinterlands (national or international) for their supply of materials and energy for theirmetabolism (infrastructure, food, products) as well as wastedisposal; corporations and enterprises organise thisproduction – supply – disposalchain for the city at profitable rates, while ignoring proper compensation and externalities of the hinterland populations…
E.g. Barcelona produces 800 t of waste each day, dumped in ruralsites, leading to conflicts
Metabolism of cities and conflicts
18
The conflicts in Catalan can be
seen as a problem of
energy metabolism where
energy production takes
place in rural hinterlands
(nuclear, wind); while city
dwellers enjoy most of the
energy supply, and
capitalists make high gains
in this production – supply
chain, the low economic
compensation as well as
externalities are borne by
the rural populations;
Energy metabolism of Catalan
Monetary and physical trade balance in Equador
Source: Vallejo (2010)
19
Resource extraction and conflicts in Equador
Source: Vallejo (2010)
Analysing the
material and
energetic
basis of local
rural systems
20
Conceptual and analytical
skills; ability to think in terms
of systems and feedback
loops, etc.
Innovative and logical
thinking on the field to
generate reliable primary
quantitative data
Anthropological field
research skills, social &
process skills, participant
observation, ability to
generate qualitative data
on the socio-cultural system
Which scientific skills do we need
for undertaking local studies?
Why study local rural systems?
� Local systems are the base of national economies
in terms of food production & resource extraction;
� They are most vulnerable to environmental
impacts and ecological repercussions on the
output side
� The health of a local base is to a large extent an
indication of the health of its national economy
� Thus, the sustainability of local systems is crucial
when we speak of national or global sustainability
� To me it provides a meaningful point of entry into
the sustainability discourse
� And of course a certain amount of field work is
always exciting!
21
Material Flows on Trinket, Nicobar Islands (tons/cap/yr)
Socio-economic System
and its Physical
Compartments
•Human Population
•Livestock population
•Artefacts (huts,
government buildings,
wells, boats, pathways)
IMPORTS
0.35
EXPORTS
2.4
Minerals 3.5
Biomass 2.3
Minerals 0.2
Biomass 0.1
Fossil fuels 0.04
Products 0.01
Copra 0.13
INPUTS
5.8OUTPUTS
Wastes,
emissions
Deliberate
disposal
DMI
6.2
DMC
3.8
Sand 2.3
Energy Flows on Trinket (GJ/cap/yr)
EXPORTS
3.5
Fossil Fuels 1.9
Biomass 1.1
Copra 3.5
USEFUL
ENERGY
Biomass 17
Biomass 3.7
Fuelwood 3.0
Solar 0.09
FINAL
ENERGY
Food
Processing
LivestockHuman
Nutrition
Copra
Production
Solar
PanelsElectricity
Diesel
Human
Labour
Light
Fuelwood
Mechanical
Energy
Process
Energy
0.00
9
0.1
2.82
0.0009
0.37
Biomass 6.2
Heat
Dissipated
or lost
Part of this
Work Applied
alters the
Environment
1.2
0.75
Heat Dissipated
& Outflows of
Energy Rich
Materials
DOMESTIC
EXT. 30OUTPUTS
IMPORTS
3.0
Heat Dissipated
& Outflows of
Energy Rich
Materials
DEI
33.0
PRIMARY
ENERGY
DEC
29.5
22
3.62.61.63.7Material metabolic rate
(DMC t/cap/yr)
37.711.37.83.2Energy burden on environment
(DEC GJ/ha/yr)
Supply of fossil
based technologies
& infrastructure
Supply of fossil
based technologies
& infrastructure
Subsidies, services, Subsidies, servicesHigher level interventions
3.31.10.60.4Material burden on environment
(DMC t/ha/yr)
0.500.010.020.01Industrial products
(DMC t/cap/yr)
64%96%98%61%Share of biomass (% in DMC)
8.31.51.06.4Share of fossil fuel (% in DEC)
40.526.320.629.5Energy metabolic rate
(DEC GJ/cap/yr)
18.61.71.48.3Stock of artefacts
93433811Pop density (cap/km²)
Sang Saeng (1998)
(Intensive rice
Cultivation)
Nalang (2003)
(Intensive rice
Cultivation +
shifting cultivation)
Campo Bello (2004)
(Shifting cultivation)
Trinket (2000)
(Copra production and
exchange for rice)
Metabolic parameters
Fischer-Kowalski et al. (submitted)
Local case comparison of metabolic size and rates
Supply of fossil
Based technologies
& infrastructure
Supply of fossil
based technologies
& infrastructure
Subsidies, services, Subsidies, servicesHigher level interventions
5.854.691.19
Time-use in economic activities
[Hours / adult]
10111669
Nutritional energy from
hunting/fishing/gathering [%]
90898431
Nutritional energy from
agriculture, incl. imports [%]
381315297 (rice)Labour productivity [MJ/h]
21.620.38.043 (rice)Land productivity [GJ/ha]
Sang Saeng (1998)
(Intensive rice
Cultivation)
Nalang (2003)
(Intensive rice
Cultivation +
shifting cultivation)
Campo Bello (2004)
(Shifting cultivation)
Trinket (2000)
(Copra production and
exchange for rice)
Metabolic parameters
Fischer-Kowalski et al. (submitted)
Local Case comparison of food production & consumption