+ All Categories
Home > Technology > Course simronsingh mefa

Course simronsingh mefa

Date post: 24-Jan-2015
Category:
Upload: environmentalconflicts
View: 488 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
22
1 The material and energetic basis of social systems An introduction Simron Jit Singh Institute of Social Ecology Klagenfurt University, Austria Why analyse material and energy flows? Materials and energy are biophysical categories necessary for human survival and reproduction They are finite both in terms of availability and productivity Patterns of material and energy use (in both quantitative and qualitative terms) affect the future survival of humans and other species The world is presently experiencing an unprecedented environment crisis due to the ways we consume our resources (materials, energy, land) causing sustainability problems on the input side (scarcity) and the output side (pollution) This has also had social consequences in terms of resource distributional conflicts and environmental justice
Transcript
Page 1: Course simronsingh mefa

1

The material and energetic

basis of social systemsAn introduction

Simron Jit Singh

Institute of Social EcologyKlagenfurt University, Austria

Why analyse material and energy flows?

Materials and energy are biophysical categories necessary for

human survival and reproduction

They are finite both in terms of availability and productivity

Patterns of material and energy use (in both quantitative and

qualitative terms) affect the future survival of humans and

other species

The world is presently experiencing an unprecedented

environment crisis due to the ways we consume our

resources (materials, energy, land) causing sustainability

problems on the input side (scarcity) and the output side

(pollution)

This has also had social consequences in terms of resource

distributional conflicts and environmental justice

Page 2: Course simronsingh mefa

2

Material and Energy Flow Analysis - MEFA

MEFA is an analytical method that allows to:

Analyse the quantity and quality of resources extracted from

nature and their passing through processing, transport, final

consumption and disposal

Understand the spatial dimension of material flows (where extraction, production, consumption and disposal takes

place)

Interpret the impact of these flows within the framework of

sustainability science and ecological economics

Relate these flows to ecological distributional conflicts and embedded power relations (political ecology)

The environmental problems (some

would say crisis) we face today are a

consequence of the ways society

interacts with nature

Doing a MEFA involves a number of “wicked” decisions, as

analytical categories come in conflict with ontological ones (as

do semiotics). Let us take for example this statement:

Page 3: Course simronsingh mefa

3

culturalsphereof causation

natu

rals

pher

eof

cau

satio

n

Adapted from:

Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999

“Society as hybrid between material

and symbolic worlds”

metabolism

Material world

Adapted from:

Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999

labour/technology

“Society as hybrid between material

and symbolic worlds”

Page 4: Course simronsingh mefa

4

communication,

Adapted from:

Fischer-Kowalski & Weisz, 1999

metabolism

natu

rals

pher

eof

cau

satio

n culturalsphereof causation

Material worldHuman Society

labour/technology Shared meaning &

understanding

“Society as hybrid between material

and symbolic worlds”

The Two Types of Metabolism

Page 5: Course simronsingh mefa

5

Operationalising Material Flow Accounting

Stocks

EconomicProcessing

DEDPO

Imports Exports

Immigrants Emigrants

Air,

WaterWater

Vapour

Domestic environment

Stocks

EconomicProcessing

DEDPO

Imports Exports

Immigrants Emigrants

Air,

WaterWater

Vapour

Problem 1: What belongs to society

and what belongs to nature?

Labour as a determining factor

� Humans (what about seasonal migration, tourists)

� Livestock

� Infrastructure and artefacts (buildings, streets, dams,

electricity grids, etc.)

The only exception is agricultural fields, even though they

are reproduced by human labour!!

Page 6: Course simronsingh mefa

6

Stocks

EconomicProcessing

DEDPO

Imports Exports

Immigrants Emigrants

Air,

WaterWater

Vapour

Problem 2: How to define a social system’s domestic territory to differentiate between

domestic flows and imports?

Legitimate right

� To exploit the resources within a territory, either

through traditional or legal control

� Where existing political and governing institutions

have the ability to set and sanction standards of social

behaviour within that territory

The difficult of a strict systems boundary, particularly in

local rural systems where there are overlaps in land

use with neighbours

Stocks

EconomicProcessing

DEDPO

Imports Exports

Immigrants Emigrants

Air,

WaterWater

Vapour

Problem 3: How to account for

externalities or hidden flows?

Flows are accounted for as ‘weight at border’

� All materials that are economically valued are considered

as ‘direct’ inputs, but not, for e.g. earth removed for

construction or used in ploughing, or dredging.

� What about the ‘hidden flows’ or ‘ecological rucksacks’

that occur during extraction, processing or disposal of

resources where these activities take place?

� For e.g. a ton of aluminum requires 9 tons of raw

materials, 3 tons of water and 200 GJ of energy!

� How to account for these externalities?

Total Material Flow (TMR); Raw Material Equivalent (RME); a

political issue!!

Page 7: Course simronsingh mefa

7

Inclusiveness or exclusiveness of material flows

If all materials, then water and air make up to 85-90% of the total?

Most studies would not lump water, air and other materials (biomass, fuels,

minerals) so as not to drown economically valued materials in water and

air; so they are kept separate for their sheer amount, as and also

supposedly low impact of their use (toxicity);

But this is changing with many studies quantify the use of water and its

ecological and social impacts, including severe conflicts over its access;

Studies on water footprint of products, embodied water, debating on what

should be produced where depending on water situation, etc.

Page 8: Course simronsingh mefa

8

� Socioeconomic metabolism is an interdisciplinary

effort integrating concepts from social and natural sciences

to describe the biophysical relations of society-nature

interactions

� The operating instrument for socio-economic metabolism is

Material and Energy Flow Accounting (MEFA)

� Consistent with the systems approach, national MFA is a

physical accounting method that provides an aggregate

overview, in tonnes, of annual material inputs and outputs

of an economy.

� Its interpretative strength can be greatly enhanced by

historical and institutional narratives

MFA: Conceptual and Methodological options

Frame of reference / unit of analysis: (a) seen from a social science

perspective, the unit of analysis could be the socioeconomic system,

treating it like an organism or sophisticated machine, or (b) the

ecosystem, seen from a natural science perspective, with mutual

feedback loops.

Reference system: Global, national, regional (city or watershed or village),

functional (firm, household, economic sector), temporal (various modes

of subsistence, social formations, historical systems)

Flows under consideration: total turnover of materials, energy or both; one

may select certain flows of materials or chemical substances (inputs or

outputs) for reasons of availability in the reference ecosystem, or to look

at the rates of consumption.

Page 9: Course simronsingh mefa

9

Map of materials of particular interest for accounting

Source: Steurer 1996

Related policy response:

Small volume with high impact:

policy directed on pollution

control, bans, substitutions, etc.

Medium volume focuses on

policy at reducing materials and

energy intensity or production,

minimization of wastes and

emissions, closing loops

through recycling

High volume flows, policy

objectives will be concerned

with depletion of natural

resources, disruption of habitats

during extractions.

Some theoretical and empiricalapplications of MEFA

Page 10: Course simronsingh mefa

10

1. Characteristic metabolic profiles and transitions across scales and

production regimes

Composition of materials input (DMC)

material input EU15 (tonnes, in %)

Biomass

construction minerals

industr.minerals

fossil fuels

total: 17 tonnes/cap*y

source: EUROSTAT 2003

Page 11: Course simronsingh mefa

11

Composition of DPO: Wastes and emissions(outflows)

D PO t o air ( C O2 )

D PO t o air*

D PO t o land ( wast e)

D PO t o land ( d issipat ive use)

D PO t o wat er

Source: WRI et al., 2000; own calculations

unweighted means of DPO per capita for

A, G, J, NL, US; metric tons

DPO total: 16 tons per capita

Metabolic profiles of the agrarian and industrial regime:

transition = explosion

Agrarian Industrial Factor

Energy use (DEC) per capita [GJ/cap] 40-70 150-400 3-5

Material use (DMC) per capita [t/cap] 3-6 15-25 3-5

Population density [cap/km²] <40 < 400 3-10

Agricultural population [%] >80% <10% 0.1

Energy use (DEC) per area [GJ/ha] <30 < 600 10-30

Material use (DMC) per area [t/ha] <2 < 50 10-30

Biomass (share of DEC) [%] >95 10-30 0.1-0.3

Source: Social Ecology DB

Page 12: Course simronsingh mefa

12

Domestic Material Consumption / cap in EU Countries, 2000

Source: Weisz et al. 2006

Global material use 1900 – 2005 (DMC = DE)

Source: Krausmann et al. 2009

Total material use (Gigatons / year) Metabolic rate (tons / cap / year)

Page 13: Course simronsingh mefa

13

India: Domestic Material Consumption (DMC) total tons I tons per capita

Source: Lanz 2008

-

500.000

1.000.000

1.500.000

2.000.000

2.500.000

3.000.000

3.500.000

4.000.000

4.500.000

5.000.000

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

1000t

Construction

mineralsOres and non

metallic mineralsFossil fuels

Biomass

-

1

1

2

2

3

3

4

4

5

1961

1964

1967

1970

1973

1976

1979

1982

1985

1988

1991

1994

1997

2000

2003

t/cap

Construction

mineralsOres and non

metallic mineralsFossil fuels

Biomass

2. Dematerialization or shiftingenvironmental burdens from north to south

Page 14: Course simronsingh mefa

14

� Meadows et al. (1972) argued that economic growth would

have to be stalled in order to remain within the earth’s

carrying capacity

� As opposed to Meadows, Ayres and Kneese’s solution was

more subtle and acceptable to economists…it was not

economic growth that mattered but the growth in the material

throughput of human societies that was significant.

Page 15: Course simronsingh mefa

15

Page 16: Course simronsingh mefa

16

Problem shifting via international division of labor

Raw material --> semi-/products --

>

use disposal

Value

added

Mass

Developed countriesdeveloping

Ma

teri

al M

on

ey

100%

0%

Unequal distribution of global resources (for the year 2000)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

S hare o f popu la tion S ha re o f te rrito ry S ha re o f G D P

D - Ld - ow

D - Ld - nw

D - H d

I - Ld - ow

I - Ld - nw

I - H d

Slide courtesy: Fischer-Kowalski and colleagues

Page 17: Course simronsingh mefa

17

3. Relating material and energyflows with conflicts

• Cities require large inputs of material and energy resources, but they have very littleproductive land of their own; theydepend on hinterlands (national or international) for their supply of materials and energy for theirmetabolism (infrastructure, food, products) as well as wastedisposal; corporations and enterprises organise thisproduction – supply – disposalchain for the city at profitable rates, while ignoring proper compensation and externalities of the hinterland populations…

E.g. Barcelona produces 800 t of waste each day, dumped in ruralsites, leading to conflicts

Metabolism of cities and conflicts

Page 18: Course simronsingh mefa

18

The conflicts in Catalan can be

seen as a problem of

energy metabolism where

energy production takes

place in rural hinterlands

(nuclear, wind); while city

dwellers enjoy most of the

energy supply, and

capitalists make high gains

in this production – supply

chain, the low economic

compensation as well as

externalities are borne by

the rural populations;

Energy metabolism of Catalan

Monetary and physical trade balance in Equador

Source: Vallejo (2010)

Page 19: Course simronsingh mefa

19

Resource extraction and conflicts in Equador

Source: Vallejo (2010)

Analysing the

material and

energetic

basis of local

rural systems

Page 20: Course simronsingh mefa

20

Conceptual and analytical

skills; ability to think in terms

of systems and feedback

loops, etc.

Innovative and logical

thinking on the field to

generate reliable primary

quantitative data

Anthropological field

research skills, social &

process skills, participant

observation, ability to

generate qualitative data

on the socio-cultural system

Which scientific skills do we need

for undertaking local studies?

Why study local rural systems?

� Local systems are the base of national economies

in terms of food production & resource extraction;

� They are most vulnerable to environmental

impacts and ecological repercussions on the

output side

� The health of a local base is to a large extent an

indication of the health of its national economy

� Thus, the sustainability of local systems is crucial

when we speak of national or global sustainability

� To me it provides a meaningful point of entry into

the sustainability discourse

� And of course a certain amount of field work is

always exciting!

Page 21: Course simronsingh mefa

21

Material Flows on Trinket, Nicobar Islands (tons/cap/yr)

Socio-economic System

and its Physical

Compartments

•Human Population

•Livestock population

•Artefacts (huts,

government buildings,

wells, boats, pathways)

IMPORTS

0.35

EXPORTS

2.4

Minerals 3.5

Biomass 2.3

Minerals 0.2

Biomass 0.1

Fossil fuels 0.04

Products 0.01

Copra 0.13

INPUTS

5.8OUTPUTS

Wastes,

emissions

Deliberate

disposal

DMI

6.2

DMC

3.8

Sand 2.3

Energy Flows on Trinket (GJ/cap/yr)

EXPORTS

3.5

Fossil Fuels 1.9

Biomass 1.1

Copra 3.5

USEFUL

ENERGY

Biomass 17

Biomass 3.7

Fuelwood 3.0

Solar 0.09

FINAL

ENERGY

Food

Processing

LivestockHuman

Nutrition

Copra

Production

Solar

PanelsElectricity

Diesel

Human

Labour

Light

Fuelwood

Mechanical

Energy

Process

Energy

0.00

9

0.1

2.82

0.0009

0.37

Biomass 6.2

Heat

Dissipated

or lost

Part of this

Work Applied

alters the

Environment

1.2

0.75

Heat Dissipated

& Outflows of

Energy Rich

Materials

DOMESTIC

EXT. 30OUTPUTS

IMPORTS

3.0

Heat Dissipated

& Outflows of

Energy Rich

Materials

DEI

33.0

PRIMARY

ENERGY

DEC

29.5

Page 22: Course simronsingh mefa

22

3.62.61.63.7Material metabolic rate

(DMC t/cap/yr)

37.711.37.83.2Energy burden on environment

(DEC GJ/ha/yr)

Supply of fossil

based technologies

& infrastructure

Supply of fossil

based technologies

& infrastructure

Subsidies, services, Subsidies, servicesHigher level interventions

3.31.10.60.4Material burden on environment

(DMC t/ha/yr)

0.500.010.020.01Industrial products

(DMC t/cap/yr)

64%96%98%61%Share of biomass (% in DMC)

8.31.51.06.4Share of fossil fuel (% in DEC)

40.526.320.629.5Energy metabolic rate

(DEC GJ/cap/yr)

18.61.71.48.3Stock of artefacts

93433811Pop density (cap/km²)

Sang Saeng (1998)

(Intensive rice

Cultivation)

Nalang (2003)

(Intensive rice

Cultivation +

shifting cultivation)

Campo Bello (2004)

(Shifting cultivation)

Trinket (2000)

(Copra production and

exchange for rice)

Metabolic parameters

Fischer-Kowalski et al. (submitted)

Local case comparison of metabolic size and rates

Supply of fossil

Based technologies

& infrastructure

Supply of fossil

based technologies

& infrastructure

Subsidies, services, Subsidies, servicesHigher level interventions

5.854.691.19

Time-use in economic activities

[Hours / adult]

10111669

Nutritional energy from

hunting/fishing/gathering [%]

90898431

Nutritional energy from

agriculture, incl. imports [%]

381315297 (rice)Labour productivity [MJ/h]

21.620.38.043 (rice)Land productivity [GJ/ha]

Sang Saeng (1998)

(Intensive rice

Cultivation)

Nalang (2003)

(Intensive rice

Cultivation +

shifting cultivation)

Campo Bello (2004)

(Shifting cultivation)

Trinket (2000)

(Copra production and

exchange for rice)

Metabolic parameters

Fischer-Kowalski et al. (submitted)

Local Case comparison of food production & consumption


Recommended