+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: adele-harding
View: 63 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling. Dan E. Krane Biological Sciences, Wright State University Dayton, OH 45435-0001. Why might two DNA profiles “match”?. • A suspect left material at the scene of a crime. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
44
Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling Dan E. Krane Biological Sciences, Wright State University Dayton, OH 45435-0001
Transcript
Page 1: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Dan E. KraneBiological Sciences, Wright State UniversityDayton, OH 45435-0001

Page 2: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

The business of DNA profiling:

Roughly 900,000 felony convictions per year in US

DNA profiles generated primarily for sexual offenses, murder and assaults.

Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)

Less than 1% of DNA profiles reviewed by defense experts

Page 3: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

DNA contents of biological samples:Type of sample Amount of DNA

Hair:

Blood 30,000 ng/mLstain 1 cm in area 200 ngstain 1 mm in area 2 ng

Semen 250,000 ng/mLpostcoital vaginal swab 0 - 3,000 ng

plucked 1 - 750 ng/hairshed 1 - 12 ng/hair

Saliva 5,000 ng/mLUrine 1 - 20 ng/mL

22

Page 4: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

DNA profiling approaches:

VNTRs

PCR/reverse dot blots

STRs

Advantages Disadvantagesresolving power,inexpensive

testing time,sensitivity,data comparisons

sensitivity,testing time,data comparisons

resolving power,mixtures

very sensitive,testing time,data comparisons,resolving power

start-up costs

Page 5: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Why might two DNA profiles “match”?

• A suspect left material at the scene of a crime.

• A suspect coincidentally has the same DNA profile as someone who really was at the crime scene.

• The laboratory declaring the “match” is in error.

Page 6: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Allele 2

Allele 7

Allele 12

Allele 13

Allele 17

Primer bindingsite

Tandemlyrepeated

sequences

Amplified region

Short Tandem Repeats (STRs)

Page 7: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 8: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 9: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Additional considerations with STR testing:

• Extremely sensitive.

• Mixture interpretations are challenging.

What does a DNA profile mean?

Where did a DNA profile come from?

How old is the DNA in a DNA profile?

• Amplification variability.

Page 10: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 11: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Profile is clearly a mixture of at least two individuals (but this is a database profile from the MN BCA).

Page 12: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Additional considerations with STR testing:

• Extremely sensitive.

• Mixture interpretations are challenging.

What does a DNA profile mean?

Where did a DNA profile come from?

How old is the DNA in a DNA profile?

• Amplification variability.

Page 13: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

3-person mixture that has no more than 4 alleles at every locus.

Page 14: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Additional considerations with STR testing:

• Extremely sensitive.

• Mixture interpretations are challenging.

What does a DNA profile mean?

Where did a DNA profile come from?

How old is the DNA in a DNA profile?

• Amplification variability.

Page 15: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Amplifications from same dilution tube (~60 pg).Allelic imbalance present.“Different DNA profiles” @ THO1 and CSF1P0.

Page 16: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Amplifications from same dilution tube (~30 pg).Allelic imbalance present. Allele dropout @ D18.“Different DNA profiles” @ D3, D21, D18 and D13.

Page 17: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Amplifications from 2 different dilution tubes (~1 ng and ~125 pg).Allelic imbalance present.“Different DNA profiles” @ D16, TPOX, CSF1P0 and D7.

Page 18: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

A forensic lab assigned the major/minor alleles incorrectly @ THO1:major profile=6,6 and minor profile=8,9.3. Correct call is major profile=6,8 and minor profile=6,9.3 of 2-person mixture, 3:1 ratio.

Page 19: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

A forensic lab assigned the major/minor alleles incorrectly @ FGA:major profile=22,22 and minor profile=21,23. Correct call is major profile=22,23 and minor profile=21,22 of 2-person mixture, 3:1 ratio.

Page 20: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

What you see when you open a CD provided in discovery:

Page 21: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

What you see when you try to open the files on a discovery CD:

Page 22: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 23: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

An electropherogram using the software’s default settings:

GenoTyper Graph

Page 24: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

What the testing lab provides is not always the same as the default electropherogram:

Page 25: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 26: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Genophiler Zoom

• Genophiler also provides a zoomed graph to 150 RFU’s• Shows smaller peaks more clearly• Here, the peaks that were disregarded by the lab may be evidence of an unknown, minor contributor to the sample

Page 27: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 28: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 29: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Genophiler output:

Page 30: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 31: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Genophiler also flags potential problems for further review:

Page 32: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 33: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Project Screen Button

• Screen shot of GeneScan

• Shows exactly what samples were added and what parameter files were used for the analysis

Page 34: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling
Page 35: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Analysis Parameters Buttons

• See exactly what analysis settings were used

• Parameter files also copied to CD

Page 36: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Finding Problems With Samples: Raw Data

Good raw data begins with a large peak followed by smaller peaks

Page 37: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

• Bad raw data is indicated by wildly uneven peaks• Indicates lab analysis problems

Finding Problems With Samples: Raw Data

Page 38: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Finding Problems With Samples: EPT Data

• Shows current, voltage, laser power, and temperature• For good analysis, should be constant (flat)

Page 39: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Finding Problems With Samples: EPT Data

• Problem EPT data is not flat• Indicates problems with lab analysis

Page 40: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Genophiler Report

Page 41: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Genophiler Report, continued

Page 42: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Automation Process

• Select samples and settings in one screen

• Analysis can be performed unattended

• Unlimited analysis runs can be set up at one time

Page 43: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Forensic BioInformatic Services

• Uses Genophiler to generate easily interpreted files

• Objectively applies analysis parameters to all samples

• Fast turn around times

• Efficiently draws attention to problems requiring further review

Page 44: Current Issues in Forensic DNA Profiling

Acknowledgements:

Genophiler support: Dr. Travis Doom Dr. Mike Raymer Carrie Rowland Jason R. Gilder

STR experts: Dr. Bill Thompson Dr. Simon Ford Dr. Dan Krane

Support:Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic BioInformatic Services; 2850 Presidential Drive, Suite 150, Fairborn, OH, 45324; phone: (937) 426-9270; web site: BioForensics.com


Recommended