+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State...

Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State...

Date post: 14-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: silvia-palmer
View: 234 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
27
Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com) Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series
Transcript
Page 1: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling

Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)

Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series

Page 2: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 3: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Stutter(little extra peaks)

Page 4: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Stutter (an artifact)

14 18

Page 5: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 6: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Spikes (and blobs)

• 89 samples (references, pos controls, neg controls)• 1010 “good” peaks• 55 peaks associated with 24 spike events• 95% boundaries shown

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

Peak height (in RFUs)

Pe

ak

are

a

Page 7: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 8: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Peak height imbalances

Page 9: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Peak Height Ratios

44% PHR

51% PHR

98% PHR

96% PHR

Page 10: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 11: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Degradation(deterioration of DNA)

Inhibition(poor PCR amplification)

Page 12: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Minimal degradation/inhibition

Page 13: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Slightly degraded/inhibited

“Ski slope”

Page 14: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

More degraded/inhibited

Drop out on right

DROP-OUT

DROP-OUT

DROP-OUT

Page 15: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Minimal degradation/inhibition

Page 16: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 17: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Sometimes signal is easy to see

Page 18: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Sometimes signal and noise are hard to tell apart

150 RFU minimum peak height threshold

Page 19: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Where do minimum peak height thresholds come from (originally)?

• Applied Biosystems validation study of 1998

• Wallin et al., 1998, “TWGDAM validation of the AmpFISTR blue PCR Amplification kit for forensic casework analysis.” JFS 43:854-870.

Page 20: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Where do minimum peak height thresholds come from (originally)?

Page 21: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Where do minimum peak height thresholds come from?

• “Conservative” thresholds established during validation studies

• Eliminate noise (even at the cost of eliminating signal)

• Can arbitrarily remove legitimate signal

• Contributions to noise vary over time (e.g. polymer and capillary age/condition)

• Analytical chemists use LOD and LOQ

Page 22: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Signal Measure

μb

μb + 3σb

μb + 10σb

Mean backgroundSignal

Detection limit

Quantification limit

Measu

red

sig

nal (I

n V

olt

s/R

FUS

/etc

)

Saturation

0

Page 23: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Many opportunities to measure baseline

Page 24: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Doesn’t someone either match or not?

Page 25: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Lines in the sand: a two-person mix?

Two reference samples in a 1:10 ratio (male:female). Three different thresholds are shown: 150 RFU (red); LOQ at 77 RFU (blue); and LOD at 29 RFU (green).

Page 26: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Factors that can complicate the interpretation of DNA profiles

• Technical artifacts

– Stutter– Spikes and blobs– Peak height imbalance– Degradation/Inhibition

• Background noise

Page 27: Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling Forensic Bioinformatics () Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH Forensic DNA Profiling.

Artifacts and noise in DNA profiling

Forensic Bioinformatics (www.bioforensics.com)

Dan E. Krane, Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Forensic DNA Profiling Video Series


Recommended