+ All Categories
Home > Documents > D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Date post: 28-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: wolfgang-cernoch
View: 116 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
550
Urmf T O ~o ;0 ifO TION OF THE AGEI/ m lAim ALBERT THE GREAT by Robert Gi'^iller, M.A.
Transcript
Page 1: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

UrmfT O~o

;0

ifO

TION OF THE AGEI/

m

lAim ALBERT THE GREAT

by

Robert Gi'^iller, M.A.

Page 2: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 3: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 4: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 5: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 6: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 7: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

fib* iitioii ef «!• Agm% i»Mai«^t

in

els ^e inivwH^ 9f feronto

)iv» i»9a

Page 8: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 9: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9AKS Iff CUiViMU

•Bi« A«ftfl&%lMM Of «b« Ml«l**««««««***.«.. 1

t«lt«i dcfintttofl* of «IM Mttl.«»««*«..«.*. •

1), St* Altort aoA St* "iriiiwn it^tttiMUi****** 44

ClM9%«r ?0O« ^« Sve^ttitjr vf tiit As*Bt Xii%«U«et«l« B«WIHMI Of lBt«tll«0%»*l l»«*t«%»..*.«».... {ft

Cta9««r UMNO* ^l«la* st«lw Mm £)«riat«loa of ttit

i* l9io oao w% fto tlao aoayoo of tho AfitsBtt lat*tOllMt.a* ^'ho dootftno of tho <ino oot mrA iho

jpo^oi>t*««. •••••••••••• «•••••••• It

1N» lOio plwr&U^ of fonao.****..**.. • f9

tU ^M A|Ntt% IntoUoeti oo » po««» of tlie eool* 07S« 1!bo Afont XntoUoot cmr tfao ootlvo j^toipl*

of tAtoUi^iUM*.*.** ••••••«••• 89

OlMj^tor Fow* Tf Agoat Xi«6tilt6t oMKQs tjtto ^'oooro of «^0

soodi*

!• Sio 80 1 An£l ito po««iro«*«««..*.««** 92

2* ^torior on& lotMdlor otaoos.**..,**..**... 1009» ftio oaiimiito«tton of tbo ft«ioat Xntcftlool;

I* %• Ml«rt*o romtfttion or tbo <^raUofi teov-riaoo«*.***««.»..«*.*****.«««««*»««««».*««* lU

a« SU Albo t*o ottitiid* toowdo ^orioeo***** IVi•• Sho WLf^irofttoA Aottvltjr of tbo AinonK Istoil-

oet *••• •••••••••••••••••••.. •••••lao

Page 10: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

-n

Page 11: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

s. a, mwmft* AlWH

U Aitomativt Miatlm****.*..***..*****..*** 13ft

£• ^t« Albert*t raftUaei**.**.***.****.***.**** ifi7

U Ate^rMtioa-IUttmftKiation,* 14K8, m* "ZnMHtets** •f 3ti» A|iNr«.«.« ISX3* ^» grtt^ I.mg^BAit»tU« »>. ••«•• 176

C«a»lailMu««*«o.«*« •«•••••• •••••••••••••••• im

S^tm •«.••„.• •*••«•« 184

r2»

Page 12: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 13: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

IlPTEODUCTIOJSr

The writings of Aristotle afforded at. Albert the areat

wide scope fbr the exercise of his genius in research. He was

not slow in ayailing himself of the wealth of knowledge stored

HP not only in the logical treatises of the stagirite, which

had "been -arell known to his predecessors of an earlier age, hut

also in the strictly philosophical writing of Aristotle more

recently introduced into the Latin West, In this work he was

aided in no small measure hy the numerous Greek and Arahian

coDffljentaries on Aristotle which were known to the scholars

of the thirteenth century, St, Albert was familiar both with

the TBorks of Aristotle and »ith the commentaries almost from

the heginnin/; of his own philosophical and theologicel activity.

He had likewise as much first hand knowledge of Plato as the

incomplete state of liie Platonic writing, in Latin translation^

allowed him; hut he possessed a textually grounded knowledge of

the doctrine of 3t, Augustine as well as of the influence of

the Platonic tradition on b't, Aiigustine, Plato had come down

through the tradition of Christian thought from St, Augustine,

who "followed Plato as far as the Catholic Faith allowed."

Aristotle, on the other hand, came into the Christian Vest

Page 14: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 15: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K 9» XlU«r list« AXtwrt

AU 9f ^«»« titflMWft— «v« waif«»t In %M mmmm la «ML«b

mrttSngt «tth«r df rUte sur of at* AagwUn** liMwrw, «h«

tmriwtotM'H «»» tg a» a«ra» naAfton anA MRwifftwA* !Qr ^M

vex^ tdverslt? of 18ii4t i^igwuih tiMgr itKSiSRtM fS^^t the !ir%»M»

9tt(t»tion o:' riotoUe M'^a'^lf <«.« ;wt ,:-c^ ix-rlfiita,: soti-jio.;.

It vat «• Al'bart*s AlWRtd v«ur«'d«*'- ^^ rsiiler sititotli- In-

tMAltffiU* to tKe::At$n fgK»%it 9gg. Hits ^l£iet.pln6 Aff«r«S A w»t^

ttmm^A» i^j^offtmli^ for the ' ^

iial»tetle« it U tfu«, I. « %ttt

j^RT St, Alb«rt ti&i» fM«U<»at tHM» mmtUKt U« d0e«m» (m tM

«e«Bl t»t«Uiet wa R«c 1^ liif«ilv«a ia hi« dottrliM on

Ufa* IMtttra 9f th* IIOi£l« ll»t» 6Wl iiJt* ^" *v-r'-ln«* «lo?\^^ «|^

HMdr wngr A>llairem, had lik«»i»<i C. ..ima 8o<a»

9t tot aoul* ehile th&t of ATljitoU* aaoM! fyiMi AC- m of

^t soul M «Bti3tM^» or fivrm* i oM«(» rw

te tamraoUo 1ti« JPifttRidS ajMt ^i»Ta%iAiBsx treoitjuma x-fiisarains

1^ mtara itf^ th« Imm» muI «ith the doetrlnt of thoagaat

Page 16: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 17: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* AlU»t

UMAmtm nth «i« Md (MT «h« Bwmmt>ttti» 3t» M%«t««l

9u* ^ »««9lT« tills p«9%i<a In euub a murnvw 00 t<» x«tata «t

etiM tno %il9^iteUe« 4»«tMrS3»« of t b<Mig««[| i£^ttU«ot ^r^d tt«e

ill oolMkUofeulai «* tl^ aoao tloo tho iMioio of ito iMac^rtelttjr*

it to (qgp tatpooo in ^lo ^oiia to iavooti^to «lii«

pidJIooopitiOfti oBdo&for of <;%« n^mft ultit r«fic«i«>« %o bio

tntfa*;;tret&tiort of tix - Ttstatfllsit dat-crine on i;:.c a^.-ont

intoUect* ?3 c;at« ^ 9.^<»?ia3. sV^f" <»r thlo ot^i^Mt of tfeio

«liOti«h« Of 3t» A|i>«rt has boon pubU^aofi* I» tliorofttre^ faol4

no Ixriof for or a^alnat oqr jcdrtiotOai' inkOfpvotatlim of Mo

doctrine* It hoo torn ss? fei i^^ to .^roiosrt tho ft»«trtr«

^r .'':;• AiltOi^t «• Iko Meseu' i;arosssto(; osA doinaio^iA it fron

tl»0 OftUPOOO Hki^ ho whNU

1 mt^t ftort^or odA tteftt t^oro ore f00 proUono Wtto*

oaitod thou tfcot of ttM ogwtt intolioet to oitooto ^« Aib«rt

in tho int^&iootool «aAii«Bt of t^o f^irteenth oonttosr* I^oriiit

tbo UfeUm of St* /

*'::c38ioiowero Mtoff mAo

to 4fiototlo in t^^o OMMO of o otta lotlniandooi* F<Krooo

onA infloOBOoo ooonatin® 1«th fioti tho ««« Ariotot^ioaios «aA

Page 18: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 19: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K a« uiUm ifSt. AlWrt

<ih» ttew41ti«iftX -"-'. -.,^-. „.i^ . ~v ... - .—jn ©f

tlw ^witilit »r »%• i«ib»v%« It &• p«MiU« t&ir^6r« t9 okMrra

is«t «8f««r«» «i^ tmsrmiUjfi^-m ai^^td igr ^t* Albert to m^lA

tb« ««t^ 9f aa.ii£»3riU€« a.i sasi; 9i4« »t^ '^ imintftlm lkft«

positive alta^EtWRo* to liotl^* Za Ms hKMllAii ^^ ^* 4»Qtylii»

•f ^.o agent iiHwUatt ttioM ttfi$«iiii«« «r« v^rtkingll^ imaSS%&t9l»

i^ otoajr* tiMNNKforet Immw «e tbio j^iat df dk»trteriii««MtlMi

•StR« lH««ll«et« It «U1 h» cMfiastfiA In «:l«m Wfitast «!«&

the texts u^, w^« ^IMVt ^UuNAfc iatar^jr«t«d In th« itfon^ U^of t,'.^ I tiioaiftt« oourdoo ^r Ho tbo«i^^ .;»%• <lllMrt*e tat«F*

pvotiittofi ^ «b« algKm«a»»« of tills qtu»tioit «nS tho tMrt&odo

ol^Mi bo odoptod tn Attotii^tln ol^tl^n ««« ieSlmoMA

IfeMm^iost iKf ^0 Tlovo of iHTon nkcTO* It oooUt^ «fwr«fOro»

1M nat anlf iaqgivepcr bat dsAiovoljr ^^asiio^ to oaq^jtln vlwt

9t« Aitmt my9 i^theat iroforsii^ o«etff|M»il]Ljr to tho «rttla|||

of thoso lo onon ho adottttodljr o«oA oo aaetu

Tbm ^l*& I ten* «Cc 3ut of a ote^jr of ibo

U^ of »«00i

looo olBOOttffo (OA HMUitoUJ«i1iAo ootll t: n

Page 20: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 21: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

!l* 3* 2S|U«r

px9U«a tn to ft* &s it *»» * l»«M4HiS aa «» ««»*« ^S^ •^

fliit tatiig ••taia.i«h«di «M MHct {>»oU«a l« %« oimw* tba mop

ptttftttUKy of «*• «@!»t^ ittteU«ot *it^ tl» te^laalc «»»o«ltt«tt

of #.«. ao.a. it» miirwfiMPO. Iiowww »i»«»My «• o«a^ «i« In-

tvlnote oonitl*ati«n »f «»• e«»il itsolf inA^ do%«w»a« to

«liii% «it««s4> «M antavo of ti.« seal 4«aaiiifl» tlwit it yMMM «n

iiCittt iat«U«a«« It ie a>« pOMiHo to IsvwtlsRto ttio »fi^nv«

of tho i^ant int«llo«(t itaeif a«d to 4ofiiai it* Forttiov lt#t

wiU 1» throma <«^ t^'

mtclloot ^ a otttly oi ftwultioo of

%m soul (of i^oh tuo ««9Kit iotoUoet is ono) vA mo «a^

atoaoo of tfeo oosl itiioir, wlU i«<s»» «io mar fO» tM

««lAmtioti of ti« «»ft- •'«««* ifiitolloet, or trlth

^mt m tA^ ooU it« moiMMaioo, o»d iooa oo to & otuo^ of ito

eofttoet vith ^o B»t«rlftU v»m ilit«A it o^omtoo* Aft«r «

Itfloff toftttotion of pooitSoM iW««oA to Mo oon :«• Mbort

4«t«nBlM« tho opttiotion of tho o^osxt Intolloot

Page 22: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 23: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»* 9« mu«r m»

•MO^^Uihid X mmll pxQOMd t« tf|ii««am ^ tllHRtaatitm of

ttui «#Mt iii%(dLl«et ±n Its MftiroAtiui <^%tHt; iii^ njmmm

iUmfofttion i^«r«la «» MKa *« «n»« ftaOt, its pmSmUtm

Page 24: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 25: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

CiUiVi4i JW^

«lv«« in fci« ;>€ ^al^iv .^ nitlon «» qa;- St* MMrt

\fc)

»%• Alb«rt*8 Inter

Cit&i-t

.\f Of th« MOI?

«B arvKsic ar «i« ^-ogrm

f^et that 7« see in

Itlon 1» pre

' 4>i . * t". *• ^ r> m r* i

atfid in(

riort

is)

ff«ti.

e Iftttc*,

hMT* in tbMBt

these aetiiriti' .^«

eorporeiV* ** *^*' ''** '^^ «iAtotftin««l tfe»* t^

«li«a»«lvee* in tttcir TMTjr eeeeneest pvineiyl

r;id« of otfeeiro iMo)^ ^

lar to tJ^- •• ' e

, that

'ihelr cori^x- . "^c-^ '^*:' '^•^?'*-

lOb ttt«9r.

Page 26: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

-<

Page 27: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R* a. iau«r s

(4)

1« %h« 8oal« In ilt* Mbert literal :<. ,,%» th«

Avi«««»nB p<Miition to ftfimwr this Initial «ti«stt«n dn tti« soiil*

fM j>rlnciipl«» «AxNi« «ciat4n(s« h«0 thiM b««a ••tfiUi0it«a»

1* «flai«d » Mol* £ttt t}i« ttgrai wdl» dvnigiRfttM t)ii« pjriRelj>l«

OAljT in m» tiut fui it ia Tammmj^;^ to aeocRmt for aa^ oi^otioa*

«ai$ omoiltatidn* GoBOOQCMsatl^ vtum «• dotensdno » prinei|)l«

of All %}»• oporotiono of « liYing 1»«in^ v: ooiil

«« ttfo th« owrd «o«il '"'^'''

*^^ •<'=^* -''Jte it oeew^.ji ,„ as it le a

{^riTOil>l« of tlM»e« O03r fi«9 st%«

Al Nrt—«*tt e«llo tli.« j?rlnolple genji.. t; ants it kaows that

tiiore it no 41ai»trt« ot all ovor ^^ ' »»««, %at onl;? iilM»t.... ^.<at

is aoo&ll^ Ottllod Igr that ij «£ioto*

All 8t* /tllsert ootaMishes at this ^int io iltat «h« muss

aniaa rofora to th« prlaoipic &aly «> *^"'* ^'^'teh aoooaata for

eertain o^«ratio»o of dlfforont l>aini^« in m tmm% has h« i^ot

4£«t :^r« %hm Atlomam. did, vtu^.t ie t^io aataro of

fi.ivt v.M;-- fft fti^« prlneli>l^, „.. -,-...-.. _.—.ilono. fo as.*.

t. ••. .'J .-. vv-ico of a vital i^rlnol^le it not •

iMbgiaotioA to dotorifiino ^« oeoanot of ttiat principle*

Kor St, AiT;i«rt t.r-P! r'^^iolatiotft 0? t>^t« problem of th© natOTO

of tba ao4l ttiitalla «« aide^sion on Ita sutotantialltjr.

«i^lain« ^ JSt« <Alb«r% aaKiouaX? asko hinoelf» tHwtg> aaiwB ait

Page 28: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

-<

Page 29: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

19 i«i*totl«« «i»t U 1sH« «oiiolu«loa h« «rilwi «tt !»•« *&»*

tttMUMi «e wiii ajw j^o©c«d «• «uajri«s t]^ anwta? to ^«

|»«t«r ©111 ««»«» *« o?» »tj«ijr s*«e»«»»«««

9«o «l«lfl««B* ^a«»tl«B» «« fi!4»«a ^ St. Aiu*rts »i»

on th« Toxioua 4«««ttt«iui of the •oul p»po»«4 ^ tt» •ttlctt

«a6 •mth^r m thu a«rinltlaB» igr «i6 iihilwaphiwa. In tlJ«

9«?er »fclch at, afcwt follovfi, th«r# «f» d«ftBltlw« f >

..fe >;.iritu et »ni»^ ii^(Ht St. Alli«rt m&vi^n *^« -"^^

j^rdoi 8««^l^iw of 4d£uc«rr«, fr»« «;%• J9^ of it

^U Som»«t« 1^-> Itlaa «tt»lli»te<l to St. Asteraati"© ««? st.

«^»orl oooo«dat»* Boirtgia* of Aaaorw !• orodttoS «tWi fefevtog

ml&t Aftfan oot sttteota^ti» laaotaoroft tmtm Wffi»*»> ^It^i .^t.

Joto of imm»<im tfeoto 1» ft v«rb«tlly Alffwont ^^rfeaentatlom

Aalaft —t »t^tat»ntU vl¥«w. otajglw ot Inoorpgyw, C03?gog»a.taS.

ycttlto ooowXoai >« '^^ iiftiaMtt lny^»il>llta^ t^rtftHe^

ratlomJlig. intolloataalio. iftfiaatrnMllo. o>a»»^oo at«» ffomy*^

«t tiiilc vtt— nmwiejttttfciwiio fit oiwoao ot ^wiwtioal* tHtatlyo^

Page 30: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 31: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

]i« 3» wiXkmSt* £l>Mr%

awriiMiiiwMf. fb« last imthidrlty ^itiot«i tgr ^* AlMart la tlii»

iQkOt U iit, : i<nrd who is of th« vt«t VUkt: Aolatt wt rttill

Qtrnt and etev« th«*« tk3f«« <l«fliiitl(mt p»>p08«a Iqt ift* Albe2>t

In his Hfomm a* Srtatayrla %hw art ^ure« otiiare in )ii» ooa^

l^tasfanturjr ttrttein in th« mmem fteaolOjiTitw ; thos* of ^«uks9fl<Mr»

, ftntt CM*lo<M»rt£B. « Ai%«rt also ad<U «KMt>

St« ' !r.«. CttMWStiJV.: on ^» flf«t 9f th«M ^» Al

8fii7«: Aifa^>jia«r asqafta in liliro g* agtg Coi'dig atoi iinlw& --

• iMe«aa i» credited vit:

.-..., ;.- . 3;slrlti» Intelleotimlig t^ b«ttt - . ;. - e gt in—a ^^ « ..^

eor./drc ordjnatty* n ^v<m )^ C«a»to4a?u8 ia oit«i

Igr at, Albort a« follovat ai« a ttco

oraata« ;>ropyii ggj <»rp»ri> tivifica^ riac* ^.e fo-ipth eM last

Ml <i«»ted in this amgr of oainta ia ist.

eic? *sAfm mt opirttag iattjiogtoalig. rntt'

ycrig.

»<Bgar in BWta> ttaw jjal—gas TOitoitatia capaK*

in the eoat4at af tiiift aiseaaai to l«

notie«l atoat ttMf ac^initiona maatt . it ia

the fiMSt that aafih of them eootaina ir^

*,.;.; : i.^i.'' \--tlrii'.. t* v^ ;-.>.il« iiavifli; »«^ i'oriui taeae aofinitioae

Page 32: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 33: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B. 3. mum

«fl«r ti^« awutw »f on* «Ai« Inyt a Mlift fotmOaUon* vl^ fall

)eM»rl«3^ of its «l«»ant8, s^ Altert iaUod«ue«i aa aw&amak In

prMf of tiM aafeetoatiaiV of ^^ •o^* ^^ is Ukm ttom

St,i^Tteoaao «Mi rt«ihtljr fti«rt^od I7 aIImH to aH^wba* 18^

•i^pwcst rum (w foUovoi tt is l«^Mtid« fmt ttio 9««p«v

•a%4«et of tiMi »oal to bt vlu»t it ia «so4^i tbvou^ tho ioal

Itoolf vMoh io ttMk oeiuititaitivo e«ai« in vlrtuo of iri&ioh

ttio Ottlajoot io «tOta»ll;^ th*t ythlth it is* ^lno£ ths saol

ftvos perfeetion «nd sj^ooifie 'Ming to tlio boe^* ix ib m

sokitsiMMi* It soiOd b« rs^^sr inooagartaoos to intcodaies

AviosBBii to KilMitftntisto stui^ A list of d«fiMtion£ unless

^* AllMTt ttoiaglkt thftt tho dBotfioo of ths Mnk\ waus sot&

•iiillsr to «wi riOonoilftMe «i^ tho triMSitioa innttsneiAS

tho sSjlnts*

AMtlMMr indlestioa of Aviosraiaa ina^lvoilsn is foonci in

ctB affpmmt whieh »t* Altert odopts S'n>m coli«otaimt« 8tv«

8%* AltMHPt ovsooo tiMkt aAatsvfir sxists is oittMor • satetoaeo or

«a oeoident* Sow aotMi^ii; s&Mifi ^onmeiacs eonuititatts tu^o Bj,>«ti«s

of sutetssMo* OS its ftteonoo aeotrojro it> osa t« ooUstt on aoeia«nt«

Bat eseh kind of sool Igr its prwonoo constittttso t^.s sreeies

la tj;^ pXaat* tcie snts&l or in man boh. iiff its sl»fa£t(;« uu^e^rtjjrS it*

fhsrofors sinee it osanot 1»o on aeoidont it msa* bo ft satetsnos*

At this sts^o it si>poars tbat throo^ Aviosraw fttia tho oo-oalloa

Page 34: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 35: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ft. 6,«tll«»8«* AllMTt

Igr dtnoriiqs ttet 4t t» on aooi««t of ttxc boQjr* ibi vffect^

i^t lit M7« 1« that th» doal to ft «a.tetano« Immmuim it is

w»% Ml Mittt4«at« Titm tb« sMMtod lt0^f 9t Awiomm It atej^

«A f)»v %h« MUfilftMtioa of 3t» a%tr%«0 i;o8lti«e teth asA*lie)

Ift^dj^ oad SjKi«aiftt«ljr«

finftll^ft Jtut Hf^« IM tttlMS «v Ari»td)tl«*« d«finttlo]i,

St« A%^m% •»«• fMrt& tiM fttfltiitioa of n :mtfwi w^119}

tiui 4«fSl^ti«a ItMliT h« r«^«et« te« aoao is ealaa« «oog«<Ui3$

to jtlftt0« action tft aiKHri^MI to ttio NraU Fe« lit* Ai%«rt tiMi

001x1 rmmi^m omovoA la iteoif %»t la MftUtj^ 4o«o bktvo th«

tody* It l0 Itoolt «aa9v«&* y«t aoroo pw; oool^oni «lth tb«

BOtioR of tho to^* Ao ft fiftttor of Iftot St. .fiufoottao itA itio

fttwrer £dr tfeio prolbiosi vaC it woo ols^ljr tldSt vatkt %jsi« oool

lo in am XoSy •« 0o4 lo la ^o wnrld* lor* Joot «• God lo

In ifeo worU taao. aevoo •?WT^Oag la tito «0f14 «|tJw«l 1m&i«

aofot ooooatlftlld' 9t «r«a «oeldoi«toaif« oo ftloo dooo tho sottl

taoTo tlt« tatfjr ftaA i^ romtno cnwvoa la Itoolf* Bovoror*

«• oftaaot m tM «hoio «»jr oaA doner to tbo ooal tho ^ooolbUlt^

of MUi$ caovoA OBoldontftUjr for tho oiqplo roikooa th«t tho

povot of aotlon of t^ aool Is of ft aon8l^.ocft1>l^ lovor ardor thna(SO)

titftt of ood*

i»t« Al^wrt dooo not aje9VO«oh tho d^nsdttoa of AHttotto

Page 36: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 37: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•-**'» rV-

«ltl»'»t hKWlm grr^toiisi? «k»BeKit«a to %fe« d*flnltl«a of i late

m ^B««i«l<m of ^t »wy with iAi«b h« l«p« t« ««1«^ *^

S%* ill^Mart MU>ytett ti^e ^t^osi-^ian of r.vto«aBft In Afl»ling «Atli

«h« i^wWlts Of tlx« «3d»t«ao« Of %^ m^* »• **« Itkowleo

•««R J»w St. ;lt€rt a0e8 Atl««ro« m aa laotraweat for ootab-

liohlns tbo ovitetaatl ^ ^« ••«1« aoUoooUy to hU

^em%ttm% of tfet rl* -^ i«*«^o ^onMtlanft of ti»

«0«l. AlttaiQ^ t !•«»* 0^ AtnOOBRft

t)i«r« **6r ti x^ "^ proooBt ta quoU tho w»i<itt«

lug »f :i^, . '.H Int4srp9^ '* Mloto^o*

fte« #jr«ei«6 oeaies3o« r-«R» «« follow iMo«Baa«u ^oo^

/^^nitlo Ayle^»»^ ^>^ •«%. «»» *u^^<Utt ^f^^^^Bl h^X^ 9^ ^^r^^^^

finttloBo gg^ fotiit Artototit^oo. «iea» m ooy»«itit>tt0 ^toMt.

St. Al^wtt ««w«»80tt thlo MWOBllJBe »J»i«i« i^ ^'*-^ .naeaealoa

of tho ATtetsoalaa 4«finltloa of tho »9al»

«ot forth t«7 St. ate«V« M fi>U0«f ( Artconrxi Iji Vl Oc

'i

-' T" Fte doftnltt ATdtm eat p«rfoetto prtnft oot**""

(22)

of ^0 oo«s?l«t« <>olA%U*mi enftblo «• to unsl ^^Jwnjoo

IHWoogoo to tho 7-'** -» of »t. i^ll*r* «^H*» t.l*l»tt% Ottefe «i4»

Page 38: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 39: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«o«la 1m m9% Alffieolt ts int«r29»r«t» Pros thRt taooiaet

p«tnt»e

(11 W9X m« ^tert tb<m is mt th« ttl^^tsst difftrtno* b«-

%VM» iiirlatotlQ and /ino«nnft oa tea daflnltlon of tba aaal*

(2) »t» Aitart pf«aatt«a aa «itb «hla alsM InaaaiaUlsr bafora

aaalyalag tha AriatalHa.taai danattiaa ana iaaMOtataL^ aftar

having atad AYiaama «» aalartaittUta «)a ci«rtni%ii»ta •rdtmrili'

appaaad ta ttiat af /^iatoUa*

(9} ttt* Allsarl praatiaaa %a aitfeataiitlata thla ioantlflaaUan*

^a aiiait aaa t)ia« ha Itoas aat Iwatie Ida prasdaaa* tk'a ara oaa

t«A iMi %ha vary haart of Hia iaa^a« Wa era mnttwnUA »i«li

«!• iAWrt'a ai^Bittoo of tha ^la^taliaa dafinitlon of tha

aoul* If tha aaul ia a aal»taMa Igr daftaltion and gar tatlaaan

IM« ara «a %o aant^rtia Ifea dafi»lti<m af tha stctr^rtta aa pvsim

patiUa alth ^a Aafliiittana adfanaad tsr 1"]^ • ii)i4SQatin«»

8«« Jata Sanaaaaa aatf tha taat?

II

fa haifa aat farth Hm atatawrt ittdeh ;i»t» ahart ^ivaa af

Ariatotla*a ftrat daftnitioa and faaaft It aafhantie*

flMi 4U.aoiu»floa af %ha AtfiatHan 91 Arlatotie ia dfvldatf

tMla qaaatiam* «aeh af «liii^ It mttg&amd af larioM ariiciea

aas^laltrtag «Ba ar am»thar alaenant af tha dafinition* :ii& Sirat

Page 40: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 41: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•net «titth«r th« sdol !• tlw aatteg <io-g^gla# In t3al9 MO%i&nt

tltiAlMrl^ d«v(»%4Mil to £9i«toti«, st« AllMrk iM^m Dgr ^s»Hxhb

AHemoM. t« tfek« «fr«e% thitt ttui wml i« ^i* p«yf««tl» ef tl)«

1N»4;« To all iM«ci^ «asl jKzf^MMi iiotiwi aoA p»facU» Mv« l^b*

MUM ti|gBifl««<l«a« Bwv»r«r» It ie fari^iCT obJ«»t«(l, If 1A*

••al i« * i>«ff«ctto it 1* la a •tibj«ot |)«rf«et«I ema mm not

«n49y tho oot of tatiittoaoo Mianfetr* tet jUi ^i&t eal)4«ot« flito

«oqld plM« tlM oool on idnt lovol of • jMuro ontwlftl fOrat for

thii r«Moa» oad is thio o«ai«« gfrfootio it not oa MMtMiMr

t«in to ojpyi^I^ to tM 9Atloiml ootil*

ffeo otstlx o^jootlon i» ftlso bolyfttl in plotting tho i^nUtn

Ift * oloor Ui^t* 1^ olnioetw toli^ee o toxt fnm tlw Ijo toAm

of Jirtototlo onti ooaftOHPO vlisr* i^ Aiiototlo eollo %&• ooai o fojra,

ho 4«ri»«o tho ooui 00 tho oGtqo pgjt^iKUi of t^^io todjr rotfaor thon

CSV)oo tho fOwao prt -m oorportoa Vo leaoo aoo ttet ^* iULbort taas

ffMkTo thirt «M tomo fo^ oat »ot>ii^ or yoyfoetio &,, ii*^='-; -^ • -^^

aetoalisin^ pri»si;;^lo« Ao «« otiall soo* lio 'mo not onoMuro thot

vio «ad !>ot«BttO; olitt a«ii«^oto thlo primiple* ato imntkoneo

of Afiooeno boooano ovoa nwro oviAvst*

8to» all tbooo toTMi tmn oooa to el^f;^ tlto ootooltoti^?

9«««r of t^t i^rlaoiple ouotOMiriljr ooUod «oiiao» But ooob oao

low « difforoBt Moai£«« it io joot oo iqetortoat for at* Mbott

to otoooo OBO of ttMi oo it woo for /.netnno* Or ratluMr, it lo

Page 42: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 43: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»• a* atlliv 10

nwrl y^«qrtMft for s%« Alb«r« to ehoMO 9tm of t im t«8««t« 1%

«Mi iia^atm^ tot Avieonnfk* 9t* ^Itert givM %«o KMin r«MNnu(

iriiqr It i« M»t«r to oftll tbo ooul ita |iot^

or a s»orfoctlo thata

» fOrwHt firot of all a fowwia ooeordlng to lie propor nnonjog

i» aotar&l fblXooopltgr* io ttet whioh hoo oxiotoaeo In tiiis

AotoraiiMito iM(tt4v miA ocmswt oxlot apart fro« it* Bat a goffootlo

•an oadlot, in virtue of ito reijr ootetaatiali^, vttltmtt iih9 bolag

it porfeetei Jitot aa a aaiXor oan faiet vildsoot a afeip* It is.

I^oroforot trtui tl»t« slnee a pftrtiotaar idnd of ooul oan oxlat

•o^aratol;^, it io aoro ouitalily «»lloa a porfoetio or an ootao

^» a f|waa. B^mm&ly^ fofwa dooiipatoe a relation vith ttiyat

ahioh is Ito ax>ot rcraoto oooE^otssimtai^ prinoiplo* aanoly* tbe

]^t«ao3r of oattor* Forfactio, hQw«v(»r« ooa|>*riooii

to tbo thine that io porfeet not onl. -xttw tstt alao ia(ae)

aU rMpoeta aoeoooarj tor tho piarfoetiea of that thi»s*

Bat vlwt of {ai^tontia« rto «»e( ifirt>^? FotOBtto> ««^ 1^*

Allwrt, io oi^or aetivo or jioeoito* fotiwitia aotira io tho

prineiplo of tho otian^ off«otod in anoth«r«~tho povor to iflbax^gt

^ oth«r-HLn aa maah ao it ie o^or* lotantia gaooiira ia tlio

principlo of tlio i^baaso oaMKBoao t)uro«e|t tho infloameo of aoothor-^

Hbm povor to %o ofeaa^ %>f tto •«Nr*«Hl^ »» ^^r ao It io tho oth«r«

Ao to tho torn iri£ or vtrtuo ^t« Allbort CKiutaifiO that it e«.n \^

taitott the oaae too wgra* fi»vjy io ouitaUo ano t'

Page 44: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 45: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R* a« Millar n

•oul la rwtpwt to ciiff«r«»t ports oT tfek« »oui* m^r&fore

neitb«r i« a^^lieftUt t» tto «Aiol« iota at th« mum tlat ftatt

iBidnr th£ tmam tmpmt* ^t« «ib«rt l« mX 0l9« ^-a 8<»« tiUt

•orxl^is^ii* friMI tbe »«Ets«B «aa tit* |;«fl«lU« ini«U& ' :or

i«ft8K»l«« H«re t»« Aire aa tbe l«f«l 9t th« j?ot<oUft ot via

ctlTiu Sot acnMttUi^ ^-u/«ata tlka •fipliaatlaii af aqyoaa of

thaaa iHUrtieoiar taroa to ma aool itaidf In aaou a aay as ta

•tsAlQr it aaa^^t«3^« Far tha aaaaaaarjr obUqt la Uoklng.

Sftta irnoM do not fit tfaa sool gtr Mpoti i^iliaw Aa a aattar

or xac^s aa «a Afire ^uet aeen* t]&agr fit it <ml^ aqaiVDoalijr«

CanaaqwiAtijr tha aoul ia aot aUa to M oafinaa l»sr t^ian tet

anl^ 1g iHBr^ietiai a» haao eat wtia Arieaaaaa in n aa

?artiiaraara» iAt«tta«r the <|aaa%iea rawlraa arauaft potantia

or Tia ox rirtoa the ax!«B*«r ia aitf^RTS the sasaa* Saab at tiMM

ImB ita j^aeuliar b«i at «Mkt ot «fei<dk

aaeb hi^^ana to 1>a t; gtia, vxp or virtuuB* %eir Vaini;

ia aat aatate&tialt it ia not m o- . >r tliia r«aaoA« iMbin tlia

aoul ia dafiaaa in a« mtah aa it ia a proper aotue eonatitaUiiit

the i^eeiea aa a«Mh ««« dking avaxartliiacf is tbat aii>aoiaa ta te

iriiat it 18, tibia aottl oamiat V» aafinea %9P «mi taraa potaotia. ria(30)

or ylrtug> Itut only Igr ootwa or aerfactio*

Page 46: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 47: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8t« mm%

of tlw erth«r terns*? For the aaa© reason eo *vlcerjse «o«b ung f»»

no ot^4»: if tlio to^ is tmimm, isa e i9nia« 1^ ie eestntiAll;

tiod a£^ vlth Mt««« 8lM« Airie«n» «• « @oo« ttOiH^latoi^ot

«a«ft«a to ««oia thli» oas «e o«^ that ''St« .^ll&eH as ei '-'<9oa '^iato*

t^aioa" «Mt%«l to t» the , as i^aj

to 1)0 ttto lta» of «b« teojr it lo mt 70 of tfeo ootO.*

BA^«r its Mooneo i« to bo a of^irit iOtlo, hav-

Inn onljr a» (rm of Ito faMOttoao to ^ » ron all this

it ie not diffieait to oto itet tt« i^lbart io urivln^ At in

oitooolni? a«rfgot.io mtfaor tiim ffarapt A»i> tlj« ^MMPinlttoa of the

oota* If ^« fN»ta to mt onXg « fwns %at io If Ito v«r;^ coeoaoo

A fovm^ t^MM fl«oh o ooal eonnot pose' onioos it infota

oe«c oftttor* ia rOdth mtt«r it e . t if )St* AllMHrt eo^

l^t it 10 aot oosoBtiol to thftt oalwtaaeo to lM» tbo fttre of *

tiodjr, if vfttlior ito ooofgneo io to lio o oi>irlti^ fuw* o j^iBrfoctio.

IM hoo ;;iTf» it tho title whioh firot iy teloag^ to

it* It ie cm oselttOivo titl«« one «hioli In ito v«ry oti^'-*—'^j

cooawntooo ijaAm^>ia&m»9 of «!ic s^^iritwail^ end eo

tmortoXit?* fl^l^ « pooititm io ^M^pnoat idltfa ooaBluti& •

th«ty MTO aoBQr tlneo ro<*l30«a in ehet io to tollmt tlto nuts of

tlM^ «no«Kw7 Kill not t» oUlitonttoit*

Sotandiig a«oin to the tests «o otoerte thet in i^ietotle*e

Page 48: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 49: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

uB« 0* wautt

M «&• MM W*** *wiwr» »«« "^^ *** p»»p«%l« i» to !»• «

mm ^fiaff tfc» tony tut jH»w •f ««r«ari«»« wi «wt»la t»^

ikwwi fmiotiAiM M ••ll w tl« p«pti«ta«r jl£SaL«lt^^^ ^

a^m a«««Mt««l ty grtaay? Ofti^ «»t »»»« w »»a<l fM ia

«bt t«t« ai «t. /ab«n to mU«« tfeftt »«« It S9t feia a

BisatlB^fm oittinetion of actaa yrtiaai «nA |£taSJEaStt^

R* oiai. tMi awt oet o» s>.ffoc*im «»»% i^i«» ^«»*»« on

«^ i>oln« of irtiion it it «« ««* i*» J*'?* »«*«^ *** "^"^

yt^m It m o oortoin ti^«i««. ^ «»• «*»** '^* g«.

t^ toe««<lu0,

1. «ot « i«ri«t»^* «»f «^«***«« - It io ti.o ir«^ Illation

IttoU. iutt.10 >oea«a«» f«t ipon o^orfttlo. wfeleb now ffom tt«

fiMt p«rfwtloo oaa •^*«M»» onjr oao or tae BW Oi^owtloat

S,roo«i« **««•• ^ «»• "*«*^ i^*^***** *' *^ ^^'•^ f«fectlon.

if tiM «« w«l 1« •« SfiBb *• " ^ ""* ** ••^'^ ****

St. atort io ooi^t»«ll«» to •««? .Itb ^iototto tmo ti«o that

%bO oooi io «»• fiwt oot or i>«tfoetioii»

io«o««in« to »«• J^*>«>^ Ano«i»»9 «p»tition of tbio

4ioti««ti«i tttit* fal«. ^«^ mMm, m «ur« toW tflr »t. Albert.

Page 50: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 51: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B, G« «tU«P8i« Aib«H

U

tb« (q^ceiM «MonM •««aAll;r » »i»«l«»# A ««e9»i |»«rr«e«i9i»

m«ia» 2^ «BMi>l«« » tvord't si^tRMit t9 oat ie ft —eom ptgt9ctim*

!Jk«wi»«» ia aftn t» Ismw* tfaiak and timM ftr« t«oooa ^trfmtlona*

A B»a io not IfM «i«iS!tUlljr » «»a ltt«ttui« h« 1» »* ftotaftlly

p«rf(»rs3ia« «1»«« «eUtrin«N S« it 9»mAUll9 ft sm witm h»

hftft thft D«rf4tatto grUBftt ?yf««W fij^ fi^ yy ff-^tff «m^ <»»t^^^^

iMcaw o«m»nft »08t«y«* ^^eganana ftutift awn ]?witar atne ^%m^

At «jl« 4ai»t«p» It iipg«wa £«iirly i?Ui» i»t ottjjr that

^rla«Eoa haa }Milp«i St* Albert» )»ut ia«o h9» )» hft» htl&«a hin*

JUi «8tftUl«blni; «IM aool «• « toMtftsea Ane«nnft*» *sa1wtftne«

9? ftecidftat* f»fma,ft inntUMvA t si^i^ortiiie Itee ««»•

Flettanitt tM &visaiitlai«n fteflaitionft of ^ a* 3t» Al^wt

«fta is • tieicltsh apot. Bmt vftft fa« ''*«»-

t9tl«*« A«flaltl^ ftBd fttili I»la Hie a*6t i«v«-.^« ooul ft8

•4itetftae«» «»&• ft* vft sh«U 0««« mt mt^l^f m satet&Boe, tet

»• M^tentM ii^^^jftt* i>qrw »t «wqHtlftm» St* . -i./t owUd

zMitlMr 4tMr«0Mr4 ^ifttotl*, nor dlimlM hlia* ;»« ^lot«tX«

hftfC t* ^ MM to fit, ftna )«r (tefialm ttt« twa «« a firftt

a<rftgtt« in thft ATiefioaica rmsimv St« a^mt eoald litiU lb*Kl

th« Mwl t« )>« ftufoh ft ftatetftitoft*

Page 52: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 53: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

6« ^% ftnim 1*

%b« iJ3di^«nKUnt »al»t«sttali^ of t^ soul l6 ai8*£ijpi&

(mee It hM \»m 9Smm t» te & tfrnftrntjo toA T»t s fom*

ama. io ta« suoctantliAit^^' ox tu9 &a«il» l«i»9crirer»"^

of ite j^rep«rtl«e io to be » fomsti it ucet^nulMBa & ri»v%(32)

lMHMv«r. onljr In r«»p«et to e«rtalii iuBtivitl«8« x«ct iw ^ft liUjkb i iftttcr with ^t* /4l««rt«

a* 1« MBt^o^kaUy iuuid ia l>i» eefMPOMili %o « affinitive

n%m& on ihe s»i»al* !i^ Avpeeto are of i^rlt^ fbegH't'tat^Kso fsof

»>i« «ll»«rt«, ^t@iiijr t^« toid oaa ]mi iMmsifUr^a oa it lo ia

itaelf• 8«9«nAljr» th« eoul oaa ^ ooiuiidorou la its v«l«tion to

%hM )Ki4jr« end not in tlov of t&« oariotoaeo it iia» ia itooif

Xa tbi« fivot eaoo it i« aet to )« Aofisod ia r^ivmnm to tb«

M»djr iMt oaljr oooofdia^ m it luw oKiattttoo in itooXf 04g^uni««

04WHiaiii« oooo f«on tho tets^*

^laui ie«MiJi«^t« ooafrXiWidn to 1»« 4r«Bn fton thio io tl*t

«• torn o<mflroat«A m% (tnoo i4th a itoa%l« dofiaitian of t&o ootxi.

migr is thto tO'^lftoaMOt « ovrtnin kind of Mul o«a "b* OMMld*

«r«4 to caiiot wittettt n Ind^i OAeioiy^ tjmt klatt 4«oi4$nAt«4 am

« fivot poifootiiwa? ^lOo io tho VM? oirsue of tho 9t4MMal

pfoU«tt« Xa tarn ttro^» oloor ototor^; • Aibort ollgB>

HiowAf in thio proUoci witib tho traditionni soh«i» of tbottg^t

ff«« whio]) h« novor oo««a to htan oat hinooif nOrift*

fbi$ pmBOWt otfttOEMst it oot forth a« foiiovoi *'ao«t

Page 54: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 55: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

iwM attts* i» a»« * MM* 4«tiBMti4i tlw m»mm9 «r -Hie'"

to wldlob It i» r«sr«rr«d* Jiriita «k« sota htm te«n A«fin«d «• Aristo-*

tl« dtd it ttilG deriniticm af his dace not IdsAE to th« &fttt)re»

1^ sosuMM or of fiortain «iativitt«» 9f dlff«r«nt

'iaat a«fJAltina of ^risio'eJle i» mi 9omi«tBmi wlin tiui

«Mft»a« of lftk« soul tet «9Lljr wlVk ihMu A«tivt%i«o n^oh ar«

•utalde its rer^ nature* as it ««r6 aeoidentftl to lt@ isfttttiNl*

lovlitr piae* thi ^T«8» f^ aatlMtte^ tfeoM ««tlvitt««

jtuptt aoaidmtfti to ^ ' i«9e«g otiU tluiir ocrve as la*

aisfiti(mo ot: «&o wwie8:voo Ia llwilf* St* i^l^trt ^-j)»ib u:;. to

glVO Afi««OBO*« «IKOi!%);L0 ««& t« tot«HFj^<r«t it* •'!«a'el;^ tie(U'.i:&J9l«i

«• ottttc tttftt «ttet«T<»r noTiw hm e «;»¥«» tfo €9 not vm^^&s

oaVO«lv«» «>pasBuv ox" want i^ie ««e«rHi9 o* s^;^ ewv«r is la

itoolf* «bat io to oiijrt Jant m a «sov«r }»« « doultlo d«nttl-

tlOR» neoaol^ first aooording to %htt pfprn^ «M^ attkoo it

» nsFtor* onet ooooM mawiiag to Ito •soonoo, eo »Xm tlio

h«»iM« ooal t« to 1m» ri^pptodi 4«n»ltiv«ijr la two vai^oi first*

tA 00 far «« it is ft sotaif an aotao^^

^i^rJs <»r»ai tiiH awtgar

Page 56: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 57: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&U abort

tj 'ij- j^'r^s - iaJ. ^' &a it iw

•itofitcd i?r i*- '—- —

-

^' '^''" •

; Ln W« Sf: ^

" ""

J"*i" "v

Avld«aaa cao -t, in^-;eri?ret .jristotX^'a n In ft

lta«ii: Ad s s- i.-ter-.ff

Ariatotttllaa aeniii*:io*:. - V^t aot 'nl

deftnltlor. or tha ediiI,

find tilt ATi laa In tM «.

tfie -;rol:l.--n, . •- If thiMW

prftUaa it , Is s% .a^<Hrt*» Ir

it i» t>«

SO".! -^rrfo- t^^if^ .. titisa of 11:

... -_... . ^ ,,__ ,-.>. ...- eiffersRt

It c ^ of i is ttaelf. f'ar

i, o*» nijeart tc: , AtlototJe e»nt«o£B %Uk% In

r -^ *•- ^- '•- - —-"^iik^ to ©htch It 1© the actiji

3ti it .:5 «a fcaw!*" :? llf«

\h9 0oul ill aat se^frTKlilft* If In r«9|?«et , g»

Page 58: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 59: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

at, Albert

««1I M tn iMf it ««ir« •i^iti»u.(» £t0a %iM te<33r» haa timi etmXA

tlHHr« te war Titftl foaetions et all? It vlaipljr vooU not b«(94)

ft 0o«X«

St* ^&«r« qu»t«« im»t9tl« to rertli:^ hi« o«a AViotasitto

lAt«arpv«tfttton of ^« ar«iic*f fUrtit a«rtttlttoii« :i^ » ptoaliitjr

t«lat 0? fofloM t^i^ sKn^MHi^ ^^i^ f7!ttsh ;^« Ai%«rt 6.r.i-^wmi%m

- i

<lt eoyporta ftctaa gniaa «ieat gataai (aattla) n

avicMP^w i« r8-intv«Sae«d to ttat& m» ^tiMtrfttias li^bt

«a Hxw peintSft Avt«enii» holds, «• dooo ^« ^t«rt« that tho

wllor has ft t«of^l« eeflxtttlan. --e finrt Mtfere to tho s&ilor

iu biisssix is eo i'ar &S ue is \im roier ox' t£0 exxljn* in tzio

•««Kmd» the s«ll<ir io oonsidwwi aeeovdiag fto bo j^«rfoi*ao «mi

naatloftl aotivltii. ii tfco inottnMotfcUtjr of th« veriSRio

tools of th« boot* 4.mc \9 ie Tala&ble In tiui j^int aaaer

38ion «i:io« tho ooftl J ti. Bl liar oool A«rinitlea*

• eonoiaojw tho soul aMe of carrylaT ot5 tho

*u£K;ii4vr<^ sti llfo in « ltio4y* i^i^a i.or wci« .aver^ io sxi. w^o

Ariototolioa dofliUtion owum oafi thot ie tho 4fl^th oi* ito

i^liofttioa* ^0 ooeontt to of tho oottl in oo,

«o oopovoUo

£ro« t^ to^» oo£'oel»lljr ttooordtn^j; to tn* ^ojrtiotaar ;^«rt

i^Kioh lo tho porfoetion of no body* Uhlo for :it« Alport io

Page 60: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 61: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1$

{36)

fanetions ai !.%« o^ Uf«•

ptlmiA*» o» «^'*«^ ®** '^^•rt** «»1^«* 4««tarln« ^M^?«9rt»#

r«tt« «m -»rlQOii>lw «hMt a»ta*«BM(»« i» «q«l»it« for tJ»

«ti«r« IB ft lJ»«le larliielpl* \?lthoiit i^e& lift* Ai^ -^

wswUUag aaid ttnaUl* "to pfocHuA* In » f«« «• ©^

Uftwmi^ »m Kt^ <ltff«r«B%t*te^ "^* ^ «»«»» »ab^«ctB, fcut

ly ^«lr prln«lpl«a, ©«• wwt , ^ attenttoxi to t;i»

oMi «» fiww 9S am* f» M* <jf« *» «!r« wit** »^« -^it**^^ i*

o»6 tldajd ^ «wa«wti«d wJWrt b« It (UrlTlae «* It *«»th«r.

i&e jlr»ti otawt »• •itfe*** tfet t«8«a« *a» th« iMeond nnar ^

«itl)t«t «it flftt. IB txty twttit tht ttctort awat, «8f ft aftV

oMdly n«e«»««3 priority, «»f«iwl« *fe» nrtt» ^toit It K^

9jt mat i3» tUll ft UtiXt ftur«itr «i«* 3t. ^llMrt*

eltb s*« AilJtrt «»• <S«fialtion oi ..jrlatstle ie i^..equate

«t far ftt I* gt«t. it ««ii%« facillt & utettttiy t«rriot f«

«VQr^ tt»ul whieii it tbt •«% «f « *«ly oM i»«iitt« »»• th«»

Page 62: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 63: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

£, G« ]iiU«r

1 iat««dtt0« tb« ln»«U«et—«!•!•

'^i«Bt 10 th« ««t of no te<3r«

6»ftM^&cm ii^ i^x au^^;4^.^ to eo**» ^» «M»«J*l«l n«Mf. of «h«

mt suffice for tte« imtioaftl «ml« A ofrtarttl pa««r (b»« tb«

lnUii«et< si«r*» f»« «**• fttSF '«••«»• »^ «* salaitr^Tce sf thtt*

«f wfcleh It 18 ft pmm» iT,l» )»<ilii« •• it ia *^^ »^« i«»»aiW«

that a T>or«r wMeh i« ,t of w l»^ flew fwws ft »a%»4««««

t57)

«t« 6n:b«t«ae« which i^- ,.jg eog>.>yl» IJ i» l^lt* pft««4U«

tffitti tiuwro flow poufiw jfiiMsA to tlj« iboiy.

2hli fig«tlfle«nt i»0t3rln«, eoatftlsiag %fe« 3niae«3»atai.

prteclsl* of i^t. iXfeert'o teaohlne on «»« •wal# **<>•• «>*

t^wa J»r wi« flfrt tl«i» t» «i« Saara *a>»oloaiiiO« It 1» »•*

fo»*h in ft iwro «o«|>l ^« «<i8«rti*l aftfl»«r» ia

*J^« ^ ^''^ eoMla»loii« «•

go ti» U:© -^ ..ui..^.> in ^^- .-..--- - • ^•i^*'* infar^^

^0 oool hft» iKww* «i«>fc ilotta

Page 64: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 65: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K. -• Killer 81St* <4lMnrt

ptr% •f tii* (Nml 9IV& it ia s^aall^ tfwe of the ««s^<l«te ta*

t«li«»tlv« Mai 9 «bolljP 9«jwnil>l« fx«m th« lMy» In eh^vin^

«l>gr tl4c ts mm«»mHl^ tvn* ^* Al%»art «(ttAtd.i«k«« Ms o<hv*

eltaiOR IQT offttris^ * ntttoaal diwirntralioa. rsrt* of tli«

Mttl Ar« iMit«na p^MMT* n»al!«g ^>^»» th« aottl, Mm9 tMt

ii M» it is ftlMluftiljp is;()M»i)>le tiAi a ti^ijcc

(«tat it^ «M wtiMM (i^«nAtle« i« edBv>ltt4B2 ettt«ld« a «

•CIPHI} 4«riV« fVOOk • «9«1 J^[tf»«& t« « teitv, rim thf^ e ,

!• iMt &t all iqpMKKtUv* In fatti it la <aulto ^

ttuKt tttata «r« svmmt timing i^^^ *^ ^Aar from «ii&t ie

aaa«Rtiail7 aa^aniLte rr«r. tb« l»g^#» Ane «}ri' la it ^oitt

aaivaat? j^iaiciljr iMwaosa avar/ au^ttrlar i»aw6;r o&t; ^/trtoi^a

«teitv«r any infarloar ««& p^rtaxiB* tMt« «b tita athar bMsd^

aSQr IstfMrior c&i^wt iia f^ist ereFv Biir.>fi]ri»r p^s^er 8s.n (!q«

Dht aaeMiiiiav tu^ saorcfe »£' %Ui mum j^war or t&a i»yi:ga»

wattla i» tha ^rtaM ffldva?* «ho i» Miag all «Ki«t«atit the

Ml tiiMMtt fulirtMwaft iKl itbla i«»«» «9««ali? Haa sa

affMt <m its ofivatlait vtHiaat a %Mdr Aht tfca raaBan tiiat

«ttljr badiaa »r% looalljr n»Ula» ^%«a» if tlia a9>4l WaaaaatiaH^ a«^»af»ta «a aluill h!>.ve no tn»tiM« in «ii^4i4i^a«

tha i^awart aparating in a teojr* -^^e o%i^ '-

.»^ ,..

•oul oan ba dafiaad aa a«»«iitialljr <1«, Ojr la

ta aaintain that aaekt antf av«»jr «na af ti

Page 66: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 67: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&• a. Millerfit* Albert

ttom tim «»««9e« of th» w9aX Aiaotleit^ tixrouM^ *

of ftone oacpWNMl (MTguu Of CO '.s Is ^.tessg^"- »

Ali^&rt, 1'^ wOmm my fmsuanX stuaa mxL xta c.

the «M«eo«« In effeet. mer ot tii» h&natm aoul it «

nrosertv of the e8»««t lt'€®t*ve of ft» ^oseetittimtl^.

tat s^Hi i's^i-'-i'^' '^"

• ^:o''» then,

£iit« Albert tttict, e&n & tool ,]9l: '.ftli.7 ^ lihe ^i^otf;

eaose a ae^r»te n&tarol co^- « Crvr. nil that Itoe

0O»e iMunnr(i» ^ua^ 9n» that it te eo^'i if f^«

iittiAleet ie 1% teperftt it it ateeetaiar thut th*

fritole intelleetual swd 1 ;tisll7 t^^awte* fhit then

y .. ). ^ « tk .. ^^ - ^. % ^ ^--> -' ^<^ •'

'k^Jt^.

jifig itt att At R ^3ll9t otor of hit tMp*

. >.a i« net raeroiy tiv: .rjgria fc»xt it It aetat ft

^tit ei ut form tive |^yil,i,' !»*

:r-- •''«»« teae^ the follotrin- -•-*«—.tt

^ lit* ai)»e£ .Ml z^rlneipl

CD flit i^^le i3it«&l«etaal toui It M^;»ittte teoqaaqa etf firon

ttat Wift tifpfk^

(.fcAiWt' 80i-ftrft*.«r^

tot*- wge-^lflittsy & oori?or€«

(S) The jMrinsi^le l^tfttiiei

netettMy OMte it the feUo«l3ftfft tinoe e jiemr ef the Mml

Page 68: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 69: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B* a. Htlley

(S) tilia* iso««Ter« does z»i i^^oAioit ««&% la eeseci^iMi^^ 9!^«»ttfei«

fPBM li»7i apMPatifig tn a IMy*

(4) ?h« t. last »t«te!s«Rt t» tft« nta-^l^tesSe ^rtneipla

(5) f^.ere is nd mnl'llet Wtwaen aiqr of tha ebiwaolaiji«Alljr

_^_,Ua l« tJ» fl»at

initio® «f tha f lliaM la little «hBn^:;«8

tlic ...V"- "' --'banaJimadU BatlMigrii ttMsr to*

; ift« itllwrt la (MMtalatanttt

^leflr, fw 3t» Ai. ... aotactla yitna tm^aatla

r. la to Uva* fhia pwirt of tiM Aii^altioa ia £)ut

m it tgr srlatotla* ^» i«lt$«ft talla ua. to abo* tha «lffar»

anoo iMittvr- ^t^lea havlns no gotaataa yl»«afli» «nA eartoiat40J

p^jroioal a pltts^ Mi aadaala* Baoa«teo tho

l*tlxxiiifU of tr' t&a aottl i^t, Alport Oi^ aa^i ytta

aat aalwaa aleot potopt^ aotlTOa i^ »v.>. >^.. ateat pem^Vmit*

of tixa eat of Ufa aa ivelj" c ; sat^tk of

Page 70: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 71: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

U.

ot^-tis^'-

to ^Um %<X .

fkates tht

or

t^.e reletloj

^.' is j<

(41}

MiM* vi» for (MH»ii<iM»tion« Iii

83U1 it»»l,f »• w.w 4..**.*.*i*v or iifo

to it -^A -j.n .--• - .1 «-?^!i»

, TT*??* in

tlMl MWl*

-'--«, ft hoe »llaiil4.

O&II the

t it to

Page 72: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 73: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« 3« fItUW

tool to %• tb« ent^ltolv or pctfaetiftft «f tK« te«y asA

i^Mpttf tetall;r to ttiat te^OTt ««i«9rU«s iM )m&»$ Oittalao tho to^Sjr*

In th« U^i Of ibftt «it« AilMWt tea «fl«M»ttjr jpnyotnft*

«di tt|» to ^io ^iat iMrUk to ferotonoo «» the talMtoetlAllt^ of

^0 oool ctaA hie '&rl««aai«ii l8t«fSMr«toti«ti of tito dtftnltioa

of Arlototlo tttoM is bttt ««o MMnmr poooiblo* 9t« Alt«rt eooo

it left «oo8 »t £at«r in ifiving it* FiMt» OviQOfar (K«altltt«)

voold Do »ii^ if tlw Ariototolisa dofiaiti^n ««ro ajfrplieaUo

to teto •—onfl« of t)ui oo«l2 »i m%m in »« oooolioroto moot

oaOoloofelo ti^Mi^Mii oooipttiM but it io mU soemd* tho

dofiaittoa of i^viotetlo only rofwt to tfeo oool gor oat«otioM«B

gIMMB fOOit C9Tl^9ti Stm ^«>» fttOO. ^%iXl» thO iyriOtOtOliOB

teitnitida of 1^M» OMJl l« ttuM iaet«VBol to ttat omoboo of tfeo

amX and ioftvoo st« MlMWt froo to aoyi In to jgl^rttao

pot iaeof^pofoaoa »«BB«r vly<ftt» at (ticlt lato» naui Api»oov«

ttto ooMs^loto ^ooitien »t «M tooo of ^%» hl\>9t%*9 miv^ fMmnift

Dgr vltloh ho at oneo tamnac Sonosloa tmct {i«fln«e bio otoaftt

M ftllotf dioonattai tti>»g oitfiWMi ««widotaoL^ „w^aa>» oo, eon»»

iMtiU»tJf<«^,

<yMWt flat^

0(^n^rl. conooatiiwui ityiototeli,

i«« iT3«rt took OM Mwm «tfls;> iJi thlo tiiaeumMLoa on tlui

Aofiaition of U.m omI* It «no on i^ovtoat ono« It ooold

bo hiotorlooiljr iimrioo for oo mt to folloo bim in tbot otiip*

Page 74: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 75: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9tm» aU t tb*t «h« ttw9% d«niil1iloii af

Aristotle 4 ts wt^mn «b»% h* litaM«lf

«•!!%«& to mi;/ a\»ut tM> Mol ^v •"v* «^ dtfinltlOB* In tuat

QU nimrt MV«r tlt9tt#% ttmt Atutotle vas Mturita with

^« fint 4€^lnitic> r v&t •l«aii«« 9t (ilMfttisfMtSoa tmieh

S%* Al^«rtt •««aMil tw ..a «M la Art«%«U« jiwvnkvA bi« «o

•MMBt oa tiAt t» iOBMn «• Vm ••mocl A»ifto^«li«B a«flaitl«ft

•f tho MOl*

^ XX x^ AgAm la tlda wayt ^atoft ot gylwptpiaia •% oiaigt

•iMittld ttsk Inv ii«« MlMVt lBlM>r£^v«%«d ttt ito«» «mi lit valtui for

liitt «aa IMNT <i4 IM ttiNi t%« $&• ttsuwii» t4 th« firtt ttmlvM ths

pv«Mtt« tliAt in «f«qr natof* tkt .ow iMiiioi<a« in «i«t

(ifn&l«nt, fl2!!Al and ibS fOr.u -.-ii »»« i:ei «^:.t«dl th«9r (»ail|fis|d« ttt

ganwAiV is aaiqa«a tJaftt ia» ttaai nim %m m^b&maA itmm— 3lo»«

th«ir rM eetiv* aRdfillttea* 3t« .^Itr^vt exrlteltlv i^lata a«%

tMi'b ^e CMutMt ar« jraaoived inW oatt* mmuu»» Umb oae tliiae

ihiah i» foim i« «% on* «^ %h« mum tla* fbrraa> •ffioiww «iaA

Page 76: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 77: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»• S, Ulltr2t, ;l%«rt

fin'r:. fiiit that ot;;^ , OfillMl fMftaa. le thM« thyiy

m% •»»«, It ie not thw« tl«w>» itt nn i4«atlt3r «»f faactififfitt*

fhis MM Mtrr^^ ^^ '^ieh the ^iiir«« eaMM «»ti»Ul« i« f«wrm,

ffjUifm MHi r , «tian loolr^S At fyotei dtff«»«nt p^lnta

of vi«v*

Bdt v}»t hM this to t» idtb tti« MOl AUd vitb tlMI

•MMI& Airi«t»t«U«R dflftttltlon 9t tfe« ••olT !^ St* ilHrt

th« homn Mol ttRn )« . at» tn «• «atfb M It It t9twm^

f99m «it eauMAltty ef mi »fn<iiBf> a t^rm. moA m ftmatg*

fluit on« «ha If ell thvtf la •» f«r a« It i« fom* !<§% at

•nuRlR* «MM tMima •ti>«ete e>f th« ttt^i «ihi t^r os»* <rfe«

eotil fa itt «fflel«nt pmmpimtlwm it ntt ft»ra» for it it

MBVins to ft j^foAott n^eb it 9th«r ^mr itttlf. if «h«

•ffititnt v«r« fOtffn it wottld tfftet itt«lf« tet tiJie« it

•trtt te ft pifttatt tiiie^ it mt it8«af, «• h»T« to look

iMQrond t&o t<wl M offioitnt to finA ttet ^o<taot* Of vtet

it the tool offioitntt ^t. Albtrt aflowott ttet it it «moi«at

Of ^ ~<dm of tho oo» •««*.«, off^seHn^- Hft* oai* tht otto

581. >!9£>oeitiea8 foUootnf^ and

dtiHndont OipMi it. ioto t&o tota ohiofc it

OfflOitWt OffOOt tt _.. .jjti? Tt «tA*« *A th*Oa^,. ;,,„,,

oble^i it ftlto it« por toijgtaa fojgimahi thrtu^ ti^o form itoolf

iotinott it it to ^vo feraal ^Hne to tko thing of ohioh

Page 78: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 79: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

A0 3« aiu«r2t» ^ItMTt

tb« »9al It foxw of the tis^jr* ft£«»^» ..isi« th« fMt thft*! 1% la

tiM flivn «hle2i 4»» tsa» e !• Mt i« to %itnta«to tho

ttdsc «f Hiiflli it i» tbo f»r ^oroU it fnM otMr

tMngt Mt «i4o7i<(^ tli»t XOK^ .V. -• Ifeert thlo i»vm

mnikm tht thlHr 9a«} i» ^iMt it lo tlio vudtjr of theISO)

thllt;?*

Htm aov KM «• «ttac to «ae>Uia tti* mmme In i«ilob

tfeo ooal t fpi r oeto ^o oo<^>»eiti(>nee

flSGBSSII&JBLx

.

'^ ^^« Mi»«rt tbe awitiioo

«r «aej^gont4» ki„ — « htuwut Htus Ia the voiPOt*-

*er»# -.ffotto %hmk *If

tto povtro oal tto vlrtttoo*

St* Albwrt Ms;.^ t.}is d:ttftiiitio& in tlito m9 rmt anl?

-0 hi f*0li it if tiifl CM^ ^ttitotU Hi lt« b(it 6160

it le the oaljr poeolUe m^ to 4o It* ^or st« #.l%ort

is fin effeetlvc nvlnol -;le beeeijae it la th* act af

Qila ie <«ljr «^' that »h«t io of the eool

_ _ viTO ers5 t.. ,.-. act is Ir --ni-"«%«ft h^y^t^n a

t to ohofrr- tKMX

Page 80: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 81: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ftMT tb« M^l ill Vim £»m «t t^ %a4y* In «Ii Uviaig ^dfigi «li«

( 9f 1^ fjywf «i^«h In liTtR^ tIkSnsv i« the ww ) 1«

lift «r iMlaff «« Mrteftl w flaraiA ooA th« oraanito w>t&«Kr»

wiiiHl»i«^ •• ^t«Btt«ii ov iMi$«ffl«&« ^(^^ ^>>*^ ^ idiifidi «•

iiT«« «• tim tamX «ff4mtif« df Uf« ie «h« ]re.tlo «aft tu^

stuMOM «f t^ Uvla^ MUa^ 1% i» iriuiJtljr «o«lvtt la «Mt lojtjr

•f irtOMt it i« ^m tmnm* mm mA u favn in oo £» «• it

is in this sx^^o^^iv )r.&%t«r»

Bi£t filiftt tt^erat tti« Qtbw ««suiaUt?« iMMljr t%mMi»'i

-"^^ ^^ f*»i» lA M far *a it is iatai&od ^ t^ fimt

effioi«Bt» M ttvaAaatiHii its <^^«rAtiosui 9m ^tm «Rtt«r*

mui M^d M ttamaft finclla it tlM «eA of laMi litdyt is irtlfttiem

to its bo ii ttatvit SM •-. tototmt of 9i)i«d> tht

to4y is tad op«mt«i »t a W^* ^t ^ot:^ is nst «b« toft of

tfet tool, ytthtr tiit %Kt6y is i^wsnt fsr ti» aaiet of sunC98)

IWOSIHIt Of th« ttttl*

^^ a^^tJWil^twi^ in ^^* ttooisil 4tfioltion of t&t toai

ntar *• tf»i*ltso '-. -ray f^g^ifloft anaoffffiff,

in tfet «tfii(itio « totmX ofiuot is to

^ A prinei|>lo* In ttit flitt dtfiaitioa of ^ittotlt tht

MKd is fl^riatd ftt • fEMRBfl ttsA it tosHsdi to M tslctn St «

Page 82: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 83: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K. ^« iitu«r 9$Si* nb«rt

pyuwte^i^ ^ ,. ^ eatdd Uxi&m oat fwa «ri«iiig! B«r ^aaaaa

St» Al^^t* ^ on thii dtftoitioa i« mt ajim t»

«lil«K is first, (^"A ««i»«s««3«ly fUthi trHi«h is yelMtt& to »U

«l*t flooMS tittm it &8 fit9t« i»»« mis %'«n «flfi i« not mmm

tikw MM wi «««•« %iit it d««l@r)at«i » MnSitjtoa »f a mmim»

1b« oonAltlM of a «ft(ti8 deaijpisted t^ ::iSl?usi>^le is 9iM0%^ 1»

!>• ^iaoi^ftv «r Ortt «ia Iwwwiaiatia So tbo o»ta «• ipriaslj^io

to ««rix4tel^ nrot &:ia i idu iU oonUtloii oo

oottoo* la^o WMNI oosoo til tf^c --.v...*.4ti»a &§Hm^%m m 9!t]£i^mt^

3tiO t£»« MOtiO Oaopftiit^^ of Ml OffiB^OB^ it IHiOh tlttt if it iO

&t all it 9m onljr iw oeswo, iiot otitMA* mi» i& f^^lrl^ «vi6«nt

feooMoo tlio »o»l 00 f^oifao 1« o^footino Haiovtf^ %i.v anji. «o

•fttoifp onA l^e .fi,

ini^,

io <&xTiT«& ot tli«oa#. t^io ^»tm^$itm of

^* »^i«t«»* roHNnr tho }i»Sigg t^ ai^tov, i» oo feir oo it

to 9o«oiv« io ^uai0oA Iffiroinlh ^< oitioii Unhi tuo offl(^«o««

9immtim tho offootiviV o^ ^^tia eoooOity of tho offjolowo ono

«» ooS^ ooar «(»« it io hi0i»r ^!t)e» lbs tihwi oai prior

tn Umk^* «• tefo M% to oi;^««to tMo Iv eaiii«9 it

iwrinei.ttgat It ie t^co ^riiioix»|.« of tlio othor oouooo* aU

Page 84: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 85: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ttds ftllww tt» *o cen0lK!» that It l« rft14oJ»Uy fltttag t»

4Mai the awl i>»i«»t»»* Si •WM of Ufe. - '^m» ^«

MMiias la tiimur«A mA «&•» le «^« *** **

(MW* } of «M tMMMOiMKm of «)M Mttor (por i»tw <t«^tot

rt tffletwto) vhieh io Javolved 1« tho owpIes of Ufo. mil,

«a«»HiBe to •%• Alltort, to oliot Artototlo «o«»t Hy thooo

tonw in hia ooeoaft Oofinitlooi ot oto ogpltoy Uc eaaoo to

dtmmtlono A^iatetello o^*"^ g^att^ur. aniaio oot i^X^^dffim

at oaaoo yltiwi*

fo» tno dofiultloa Itoolf• M% *»t to th« fftloo

of tn5 loftnltlou? In othor oo»40 whjr aia ««• abort

i «E»tti«r floflaitloftt »o onooor Ohowt not

otOy Ohi 8*. Ai*«* •«**«* *^ *** •*• •^'^•* *• * f*»«*«»

«9loafttioii of tfeo tw AfiototOlwi Aoflaitiono. »%• Albwrt

y«i|iia« 00 ttoot in thio dioooooion »• oro i» tho floW of

amidtlmm* la thio a^ it io nooooooty thot ohot lo

QMMBBlj OttrttlltOd to O twine *0 »»0¥OII to to *OTU«aiy OOOll

19 aooao of tho »roi>o» owioo. a «aiitf io ol*t it io boowioo of

1^, rlor ooeoBftiwoo. a»»* iWofe to ftior in tho o«o

pe eoaoiaomtlon. tbo dofinttloo of tho oota» io tho

^g^^ c. -^ *»»• !***•» *« ^^^^ conooqimtljr,

ftel tbo oo-* Qfnorlo atooioi hoo to to oonoloalvoly

Page 86: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 87: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»• Q« HlU«r

diMiMitrftt«d thf»«tg|i ttttt oAtti* «lii«h iMN^tffljr ImtIb^ 1% atewt

^Mit ib* wed 19» aattf «a»gg»gl» ft^tgirtet* la ^Vum wuHm mhm

^^maitUm of 13i« oosd 9f«tad be ftmaA imielk «iU <UM4«aftt«

^4« 8IKMMI aatt git« tii» rmmm ftat m^lne ^^^ ^^« >o^ i> ^<>

•ill h«?e A 4««nttf»ia«i «6«ritB %h% first dcftatttoa {ihetM

4W»p>ri» ito>icl ) is d<mon«trftt«d throat •ne^er »• tbroti#»

& <Muui«« st« Alfesri MLtvrss im finds sush a hslpful d«»

irtttltlon in tSaat on* ifttift dtsignstM ths saol to te th«

prinei^ls «aA oaoss of llf« of t^is kind shieh to outreiosA

ta a ykfateal ted^*

£• «o MTO w^l asOYO art* /4.l^«rt fsals that this is tho

dafiniticm «tdalx i«istotlo advaneao la IX im Antaa fur

raaaons »• mm j^rooasd to iierofttii^ftto* Am st« />lbwt too

it, Aristotle boldo tMs to ^ a d^lnition as a j^riasiplo of

a donsMtration :roator g«id» It is tho ososo tltrw^ lAitoh

tho first dsfiniUan is tlswowitratiyoly ooaBlodod* Aeoerd«»

«_ ^^ ^^ ^llMtrt ^istotlo ooaotdtM l^s first donnitisa

-m rmammt first, Immmmmio it oiO^ says ^aid

^ " not pfofitor ^luid talis wt sm%«taati& st

ipooi«>fa <^^^ » A^.»ijr» WsaMio iQr it ono eamiot kaom tho

eaoow of ^o aoeidonts par so and th« oporatieno ohltii ato

pW so oaitaUo to tho soill«

Page 88: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 89: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&• a« iaii«rst« illwrt

!• oaz««lv« 4e not tev* to owwtraet « agrUaglaa to

««•& IBMV th« -nlw wf « t^toag iiiiiMitfKimHwi «ldifl& «»«U

ellneh his o«i ittgaMKi* 8t* Ailwrt ptmtmU thf tylU^m

ia «ht^ m» 4«n.»ltioa 9f th« »dal is eoneltidid from ^« tttlMfft

«<oidwitiag In pl)isr0t<» weBBlao »wrg«r» ta tato «t in aart-

Ibut, fl»t •etwi tt itttlo at ggeelw lp»laa»

1I« AaioA «it p«r «« pHnii^wa «t aaoaui «t«ran tltaa mk

MMldcntltiMi ia ^ligrtltto ar^aatoo ooi^ara aaemolwi tatan alt

aaaaaAm iiMJtaa,

III* r4aa aat aatui at taHa at a^aai«i»

la tbla a^UsiaB «• teta atet 8t« Alfeavt tea aaaeltaaad

•ftar intarpvatias ^riatatla* it io a atnaifir atataaartt af

a i»aalttaB« a vavaallas atataaant* aa «• ateU hava ooaaalan

ta —ft* 3«l twt tba ^tmmtt «a aagr Jatt amaiiv aMrthar ^tlatatla

taalljr aoald aqepart iit* AllNart*a latavptatatiaa* Ia ^iat

af faat it o^ aa atataft ttet Atlatatla i»m aat aaaa ta

avtatala ao^liaitljr itoA tha aaaant «iM»iti!3a la a prinetpla

<^' * Bp<»Ptay <^ iaaMatfatim of tha ftiat oaa* It la a»*

daaiattj tma tbat at tba ^aattaalng af Cteptar l^Mi of Baofe ll

twartiitaXy aftaa daaliag with ^a Brtnaa aettai daltaltloa

Ajrlatotla daaa aajr ttet *• aaat vaaonalaar tiia ooul, for it la

Page 90: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 91: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« 8* MUIer

1% ssiat e: in«ig»*

^%« ^bart takes »Tear tik« raMqplt fioa swmtf; f»ttM

>in« In ^rlatttU«*8 %txU It alavljr eotwlstt ia %•»

raUo cwwltflonig, ^ tb« %a.«0ti3a* «tat it »qawrtn«9 tiM aniww

is« th« tt^strvteticm of «a «qidlat«r«l trUosla ««tftl to » elT«R

oUore; r««taiist«* '^>ia ia the d«naltl«ii liftvlng ntU tto«ola>«»

Ionian ;or th* v««Q«d» Mgrlag pragtar data: " .•rln^ i« %h«

dlMO'Ttty 9f • lin* vtiioh Is ^ tM

tMi ttM^iml slcUMi ttf e » it U

«iMM#t to aagf ^tot it *^hat tliMO a«nnitla»» ^^ »<.^

Mcd ifouLld ^ r^»t«d MP i;riaeii>l« oadi eonelttoiosi of « j^,

6014 d^onotttttloiw ^Lm ^^9 m^^ /«iototlo eii« » £

of A oort of rolfttten botwoon t«o 4ofiBiti«a« ^dd^ «m not

^to kliMl MMnnhmi t: leflnitiMt of t^ ooal* X oo^r It

^E^poofo otesh &M .'^\, :^8opt«tt thftt aa

«ttaoiit£-. ^^-^-t It wo Mo tmmlBt'^..^.^ -^iJich

•RHkUoA hitt , '^^U oUo 000 Uiot oiiothor

iiptotproix itolMd,

Far«i«r, at. ........ .^-,-. - .— - -^-.- nftfimunns «o

Vx§ first xNKn owuiiAwatt di»l«otie«i oni vain «g ixiototlo

Voe«B»o thejT loftvo oBknooii tho vme oo ooaldgitifc Mad ts^olr

Page 92: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 93: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

m

eesuitfi* "^lat ^^» *^-rt msX^ «h« «M»xt aflfiaitioa nEdi«e «ltftr

«tet 1fe« thl t^ It U fOAb* fVttftt Axi^totU doM

f«eftfd M ii( vOn d«ftiiltt(NW i^oh l«ftv« iinliiww

«h« i)»ptr«le«« "'" ristotlt 4oc» nst Mtaall; mqt ttsMt tlM

dtftaltiOB of ti Mi or d»fM io on* oosb ^ooftooo it

4000 Bot NBlEt t. ^.ftV^ftto»«i» immm% AviototU

PMOOOOO to dlOOttM tliO O^Kil Itt U&i^tOV V«0 Of Mtik XX 3%,

MWrt f«oU fo« «aa otsoatioflol olth tM firot naai evooOi

^ ttkin to «^^pl7 ii»t i^ imA mA& oi' dl«4ootteol oatt

f«lA dofinittoiai lt< w to tbm nmt tfofinitlon* Ao •

Mttor of fM»t Aylototlo*« ooeoadi doflattion oontolno tbo

proyorttot ooft j^rvpor oti^«»tiono m <^ffor«itKi to that ho

6000 aot licrvo to bold tliat tM pv^ovtftoe oro oii^ovtorljr

60F ^o fv«a it«

ftirrtv«t at ^0 p^Utt olMro it to fldvljr ovia«Bt

ttet tho rolatioo tatt»o«R ooul» prtnei^o «nd oet io «

rolfttlon vhoroilk pHnoiplo la ttto oldilo t«n of o giOfitor

l^t^ doooaotviktlon, : thie ap^Iiootion of s^imii>Vt

St« AlbHTt la alAo -- . -.__--—. t irltfe Ma SEnlaaitlgn of

^iototlo*a flrot doltnitloxu l%o ftvot v60 ia&eri^«ot«a la

tlio f«ai ll«^t of AViOORT . lie AviooBoa iO flOtiOOftU/

oteont hero In thia aaoor los, hla lafloanoe tsas aot

fltwait for at* All)ort,£faa laot cuaa vloleneo to ta« «orK

Page 94: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 95: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

iit« /lb«srt

d&

owpooyf plOTtoi n»% In »< ta* ««ly to 9lm of the r«lA%i«a

it faM to i2:t bd<S^« Itwft thla r«lfttlon It ia a«aoaimt«A actug,

tot eotoo is in tb« tady M if tli« fO(aid«tidii of tbat Mlfttioiu

flkio l9K9m th« door op«R so tl»t thcrt eaa %« » «iadl« )>«t««ttx

tQ«l am aotyu fhit alftttlt is tlxo t«fn ttatini; %te rel«tioa

in i^ OAVM* ^t ai4al« t«im p«rineipi« tsoA tMtoao of vorks of

lifo «a& p«r 00 aqajAwti* ia soBfe » toiy« porflMms this fooe*

tioru S» oaU tho ooul ooeh » priaoij^l* tffttoi l^o roaooa «l«

thoro is tho nlotion p«»«it%iag «kt soul to be mlltd. aotas*

jiaa taOM»e tlio sota omi tho b»4;f «nj«sr tuo %y»9 of offieiORt

(60)

oMool rolcitioa «« mm ofeertf tbt oot^ of t^ soalt whiob ia

ia tho ta«^. is thfi offset ana fttUsm hos«ii«o of that offtoieat

eaooel oetivity ef tho soui*

Otfoor Slvsente in the roUtion httmwa tho first oaA(€2)

ooooeA dofir ^ro aev otworvoltlo* to noto& that st* ^^Ihort

owtftoBS the «^ aofinitioa lAiorsas Aristotle has no

fliSBtioa of it ia tho dofiaitieos oited th«ro« It vaa stated

«iat Aristotle saoBewttes tho oorhs of life, inolading in

tlMt inaMratioii intoUeotlon, St« Alhert does not* It wt

not ea overol^t on his £)ayt« !^e has to exelofie intellootiea

in wdor ts oonoisteat with hie Ami definition* fho

ratioaal soti .;; to oortaia of its ^rta is not tho

Page 96: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 97: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•fOt of « l>9<Drtt i^y in M £ar •« il)« 000! I0 ocuiMlly r«t-»

pvatOM^ for aeta in is» IwOsr la it to te oonoluaivei;}' (t«lln«ft

•0 SS3SSf ^^^ i^^^t^** ^^ Aitert to hoia tMt i» fex nm tha

•Oul i* jrli^i^:le a: o..€rRti>j:iS etfjiijiti^ In m^t;.^ 0^: -i> vO^;,-

or Qoatjf^xml or^pba it i9 not mtf

«

SAttuw io it in tisiia

ft^jUft •«(90iia%0 aiiA ««g;fi«ftia«* If i^9 **iuw^ detlsitlim as

turn «id4la alMVtiv lAgr ttia msX la <atc,tu0 acataa tm swrKs

0f Xif« MSMt latitlaaad iattillaotioa trntaiti; tiMiBit ^« «^1«

ttraatiKfa wota 9aU«i^i«« «^ Ail»«rt m-^i w latm» %•

«U 3t« Albert iNMrangljr vantaft ti rawitn Maaalf* Z i«lik«r

«iiak ha OKU «« fliaaii 000 pnattstljr* If ba 4l<i, it «o«lA

IMM te«n ifl«»av«tiire,tb0t »t« Ai^art £a0iiiaB hla own niittla

t«M tgr latMdaolng tha to^ Ir it Mdi HUiag^ aadttta^

intidlXae^aiu

Vkm it ' — tDat ist* Al%art*a «f!C»»ta ia «m mttum.

deflnitii»i cure taoisciitioitaA t^ uaeira to ranain fin la

«i0 00m: tlko fifrat Ar liaa aafinitioiw It

was Ancmam tihoaa ast«i0iva htt; oalvffi tho fimt ««fiaitiao

and adidtt«d Aristatla into tistt aortaiwiTa fsratoratt? »f iridic^

iM bara 00001 Fl»to mm m. «bact»v anslMHr* or, it oa«

tMi inAaoBc^ w. ..'iU-.^m which oajnriaA o.^i » ». ^ndltiattaA

t>i« iat«r£««tation of tho aaaonft ittiatatalian dvfinitiaa*

Page 98: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 99: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8* 7# ^lUr M8*. /Ibert

i^tcr ftll %h«g<» IM ft gtftgttilqBftI iM»lnt of }»i»«r «it atft)t««»

if &it« i^l%«r« )taA »»t mA AyivteUt on ^« •MttaA itflaitloo

ta 1ife« mar ^« diA* AH«te1it« mtOil hKf« %•«& tii6ttBst«%«iit twe

8i» 4i)Nurt in volatloB to «ht ftr8% d«flaitl9n« H««ifrsr» a

eoatUevfttlM aaipsMiii^; %]4> in S«i^t&7usc ImmA l««g«it

of all ill ^* AiWft»t iilitS. wiitk «hu itt««e»v«l«llM tf

AristoU* the ana^tnatnt suliHHitiaUV ftf the atMl was atiU

lAtest* 9h« fMoasU* af ii>a ijanartaUlty aas aUU la feraa*

fha a«al imA \mm ^iMift «» ttiat #HMM»laa iggr iit* Al%«H hto»(64)

xu

J-.. aa «lia ^roHan* Tr ^ ,

^)M»t mM atatad Ma paiAtlaai InH ^ara ara a ias aaaBtiana

ha BRw% H aoiseA* ftuma ^MMHtiana wnra ii»t foni^ ta su

AV39rU In faot «a e«B M asra %ia a»a ««»« af than at aMh

at% ia hla daralapawt* at* Jil^nrt lute Mii<l «l»t t&a «atiaa»

' al a^l ia tha aabBtaitttal font of ma^ i{9 has aalntalnaft

that ttia aool io tba aotetaatial f»«M of a j^aioat tedy

i^otestla vltaa l^banltia* fbla aaol io tha aat of an orgooie

iwdijr gotoptia ntoe halxwtia* Bawovearf it ie not atiah as

aat Unoa^ ita got alaao Iwt fat&«r ttavu^ ita va^ar

aaMnaa* far lailoae .^..^ .iroul »a»a tha <WMiaaiiKilB fwwa

fcaa^U^ am aaolA r nem* Yat «a hava at* Mbort**

Page 100: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 101: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« s* MtUtrSt. Mtart

fw th« «oal to ^ tli« f«r« 9f %hi9 lo4jf$ t^t th« dtn&ltim of

tli« ••si aamsAeA t/^ >H«t*n« 6««8 d9t Afr««!t \h» wvaX la

Itiiltf* It t^Stmm. m « l(;»9Wl«6^ of 1^ %M»9m9 of tibis loal,

twt itt dtflnlim tilt ••aX 1ft lUAi »• tollM « otrrsMst

tieAitiom III »» wtm iBptytta* tt l«iWBB»t»«Mi^ Mugger

ttM qoMtioa M to «ebftt isu AiMrt mmmis ^ Mgrla^ It U »ab-

itaaMal for tho saal It 1mi 1b« *»tm eori^riji« ia wmnn»

t« tl»U Q)a«i%i«8i nooottilfttos ogut Mklng ^t« ^llMrt hJamtlU

St iMMi tiMi v«s^a^t ho WW nmmt i4tl»«( it in all his «ritiRt|B«

tko aat««r tf 4^ ^%trt &• tt ^ ft(i«i in th« dlaUxiotioit

betwejea n:v*le &f».* so,,l9 as OtHpitlli tiljhltl»ti» *i*t ««4

r^&isai°. ;»«« iillMart «oii|pa««& Uo ovtielo oatitlod 1m qiffortRtta

oagoll tt oalafto lo* In «fir««t« tU^ti ttaout it vot t vttl

pvobiom is. hia i,»liilott|»liar« AsspttMtttlQf Alxooti^ Uio m0»«r

viULolft St. .Ui .^tt tlAt t2i« tutetfiiitioi dliTofrooeo

iMrtwMA tli« ^ _ - ^ «t«l» it that ^t MM&l it

wtundl;^ tijtliat «r ^oisine t^ to47« att aa k xoca obloli

hiMi teimg (bUl; Ia aattoar tait «• o font oaA • tatetMMO Mtvlts

•»A rttUng tiw te^s^ ftft fMribiat tf « taDUMr n»Yiii8 aaft

(67)

roliac kio tlili^* £«ml- ' '^ somi ooKelaoim in a 8li«^],jr

diffttOBt Simm» «tet i*t« ^ it i« tMt tb« tiibotMttl*]L»

Page 102: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 103: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St, AlWrt

MpmiiU atffttiwt UtiUMi «MI ina awl •» «lgi»l liM la %h%

foot that th« hstmo. •ool is iaUlsiest te tlie Iwd^ «• 1^ avt*

flM «oal is a splrilRMa •«%•%«»« with a tsaAaaoyr 1» * %Mjr«

Aat «ii»t d««§ ht aMtt tili4B lor Man«« «)>ftt it io Mkttantlca

for th« Mol to 1)t «M airteMi —laawrtT Bothlac tet tniss

it la •otettfitlAl for tb« 0ota to m tho act of t)i« teOjr on

tbo ti:f»)aiiit 91^ that aatoml IneUnatioa it l»s to th* body*

It ie oatetaatial ^oeaaoo it io aatoxmii ttdo aoitotfintial

oiHuaotor io s^tmmt aaijf io oe flur ao it io ptetfmnjr

natHxal for tbo oool to fooJl that inoliaatioii to tt^o te^y*

Siio ifioiiaatioa tooatdo th« te4ar ooa»xloo« tho diffor-

oaoo for ;jt* Albert* ^ tUs avo rottiaooii tho vavitttloao m*

rortb ia tbo ;>aMB»a ghfoJte^a^ ai«M s^ AilMrt hoi(to tiiat

tii^ 4iffov not only opooi 4& aUo s«)«rieall7* ^bo

iSia«rio ^iotinetion ariooo tmm tho faot ttUKfe tbo ratioaal

oooi iMU) a toanlttae; to tho doiootaUo tuini^ of tho iwdsy ii^«ro*

ao til* «3a«ot t xe layirit io opavoA tlutoo yioasuvaUo

«OHA«nioo« ...V _ ^ifio diffot^wo opting fto* tUo foot

ttet tho vatioiial soal oooanaiai —too— aaa on tbo teoio of

ito ohelo dioi^Mitim «r »3a»».V»g io aatavaUy eoinatilo of J|oin»(69)

hftn thio io not tii«-

:ov io

St* ^Ibort to salco hio i>oii otiii «•

Page 104: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 105: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»• a« vsnimf 4ASt* Albert

cii«^tlc»n u ._ ^-^ ,- - ,. i Jeath, aft«r iSbm

i ._, xa i»t« iH^Mirt «.'.. Is i8 nuffl-

cit-nt for a aaljav renc*. In f«ot tht s«MU»tid

^hl» is so tra» tlat «T«n th« B«ftUrie /ialgta e«sa»t Iw j^cr*

f«et tar thnt e«$^«j»%«ft smiI mtll th« rfleorrectlan of tfe«

lso%- 6a& ita r«u>-:'' *" " ' sotsl* at. .u .'-' v '. . st^

Aaptttlnt to tJ^A« it la tMe feiijr mtwnd ftp^«tit«

nt th» sdttl l^r its , >hX<^ r ^.Miiplftte «n^^«Bt

of too ^&«hUs ic . isian sarttl. wml a rcourxHKtioa

of tIMi %oeiy oeeuroa. TMa jraaaigox ts all %m% U aceoooftty

fwr th* si)^,^iMrtKt«& mral to p oa :i^s tliovo to «a otovnftl

UiM in eontc - *-'- - '--,

at»« It? of tao oota

bfts )>a«B ^ ^oion of it« > ^it«l iM^tntona^

c--- -' -^'.,

'^- sl,^lfiMki... ..^idore is tiatt 3t* AllMurt

.11^ it vhllo atira&i*ljr inoiotl&g oa tho

u -,

a)3o«rv«£l the nckto «aA

hkombt of Ido oqplimio-AvkkMi . ^naot f*ll to »mA

m loMc to the oao vAiooe ^«i«iu> t«lai]r Iteli In

fldUufi* to ooft ««gr *a0«t eortaiiO^* ttoaaoo ^« iXbort io not

Page 106: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 107: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

a, s. Hilar *•

Miint this gnplMWftl.<m ^nm ilbtrt »rrera «« «ti« mmm ^mnl^

ht ma M^ «3»t £^ i» m% «wMMl>t*l lo «)»« tmX ts m fflm «jr

Htm ^eO-r fihlls ffiRtfitstnift? ett «bf» 8«90 tiflMS ItiM ^# mmX ix

In tJi« dMtrlR* 91 a^. % AllMvt, «•

«» ^« dtfial^ida of s%* i^iiiira«tln« s»a is « fKUMuil Mtafti* «•

it v<9fSt ^^iMQwi'm to doftHw Ssi 99 tm m» tm t9 mMaml h» !•

<itUiie{«i»^^ tt^ ^** '^ "*^ in «• fiMP « w^ftftlf h» !• dt»-

tlsg>aigSii& ft^-'. o aim* Ms mmmm i« «o Iw a tftt^

tofiAl aurdn .

.

or hia ^oidl? iOm* n»y hl« s»M««d

in}nit &!» to *"" ^''At .^..» .^« --. «^*il ife» «M» ft 1»42f» ?h» oraa«»-

•tKxdln J'ler lmDlt«8 nai la aa «ai^l«»iiaft af mm•f Mb aonl«

•• • "^ ^ III mtm *— I I

%» a to.., ., .- -srteAniifc^sprt low* »et l8 t» m ^, i f^^;

is a Mfttsiftl fti99SUtt i3»v lais IM^ •esmrOiag to «Met» ttio

ss«a is tatitsd ts ibm te^ ones s» toiitift «)S onit^ «{ lbs

iMMMtt ttSPpOSitS M totVfSV tVSaHISS St* ~ ' '^ "IkS SSOl

IMS te«a srsatsft mMrt fion tbs bodly s&SeH lNi4y Has te«i

Page 108: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 109: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

oreat«& At tlu» saie* tiM« ao t«» •f>««k« aadUnr th« fores of «

sAHdnel ttmatm* Th» oool tl»ui ex>«dt»a hAs a tttruSAm^ to the

Vt MOsiltAd to t^ liod;* ?h» oBion t« «ffeBt«di nOim Oo^t tf«r<i09«

th» stttdnal reasaFTi that treats eosl the soal tftkes n^ lt»(TO)

MMt^TjF 9T«r ta^t iscAjf* " tJtie soui refusea to p>

to the bodjT* It Is idXo tiii^iiositton for Sod too eroatoct tb«

«ral mith ft nfttEuraJl Aooirt for « %043r« ?h»re io thon ao

qaoetiont tho oool vtU I^UMi tbftt Igr viileii it vtlle natuup-

«llj towAVdo tfcftt to whioh it tcnoa natat&Iljr* Tttia ia •«

tra« that ttitt so<il lo In tho ^otfjr •olol;^ ^ a>i ^et of its

will end nat as a cometjaeicc o: ay\y fall into iiii<salVtt ?hO

•ool ia not ia tho tody fta in « prlaoat it ia unitad to it

tqr lava «a aa vHmXag onA ooiia«nmtiT9 foree «^ieh anJjMtaa

it tauSi laoveis it floM witHin* For &U ito^^Mtina thia imlin«

«ti<w iam Mt snlEa iMaft of iha aaaanea of tb« aoul* It ia

oeamtial for th« aovU to to ft autatftnaa ia(l<s>anei«at of %b%

«aa^» bsTi mn lifa ftaS ^flngr Ufa to tba to«9t ^ith

St« losuatina tha aoul ia natoralljf ineilnaa to a todijr aat

Vieftttfta it ---i aa««n«a of tha ao^a to to tha fatm of

ft toOj^t tot to«ft(taa ood ao eraotaft tha humoe aoot to to in

Sta ^99w(i* ft aatotanoa («ndl tlnirftl^ iaaara ita iisaortaiitjr}

irr)diatinet from tba to^Ojr* iTMla «a Igr im Mmna intanu to

Page 110: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 111: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

i» a, MlU«vu

Mtnlttia «»•* *fe« <to6tyla» oC at, aag?»»tin« t» idBatlcal with

^tm\ 9t au M*wit. «« flo a«lnt«ia «At th«t« «trlJsl«g mmw

1»lB»»«t fty« imd«niftfe&« inei<«Jtl«K» «h*t *»»• Aag«»ti«tt» <s»e*-

tin* t» <Ur«etly Urtiiaft ttst of at. All«.r% on thle p»lnt.

tNicts^t MiBldne to be nten*

.^* * eai «!• 'Ith tluwi iMi aiRln»

tains th« uali* of" «fe» ?««« ww|?««lt« •» ••H •• « ?^*t^*^i

lnclit*tian OR «« p«rt ef %fe« »Oftl *o«»«^ «» ^w^J'* ^^**

ih« »ll#»t«8t Intmtloo of ln<rtl*«ttn« ft rtgwraa* «oii£*rlwn

aU« to •«* forth thwt interreUt«d •l«aant« In ^t.

eom^Uoa of tfe« toalt flwt, tho int«ll«ot aa oo^

fora of *h« y>o&n wsooacl, 3t. ®»aftt« l«twpr«l»*ioa of

Arl»totl««o oo-oallod "fw" d©fl«ltl»» <rf «^« "o**!! «^i»«^ *^«

Hm of ^« «»«« 9«»tWo doul doftnltlon of th« eoal*

•-.--r". St. av>w «» K« n^-Utaoa tfcat flinoo «i«

a jjWO* Of 1fe« »oal mm o^WPtt ta* wi»l« **•

tftlleetm i^swt of n^iosolty \m ocpiurato onl dlotlnct f»«i

t. . :/>-.. nls eoaelttolan t»o Ylconk«»l7 att«l««d iai tho t«rt

Page 112: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 113: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

a3t» />lb«ri

•s»ia*t MM01MI •!« hfW «» th« lat*U«et i« tb« turn of tb«

(79

]

um

to4y« w« aay dlw«T« tlm mik im haA in fAnA In Wth «tt»le«

%9 tiirali« »• at, lawMMi M M »4»««M hl» ©oBflettim that ««

lnUll€«t, «hioh 1« tb« prtuPlpU of ii»taieettt*l o^«»tlon la

^tmnftim buna tecly. u.., .- t« 8M« ^? •teWTia* tl**

tiAt ^n9\9 •«r^ne fS»«t «t« !• tw i»ra of tl»* ta «bl«a^

^e ftist U attxlteteA, lfe« w»oa for thl« l« to be to^ ia

«M fact tl*t aatblaf •«»• «tn«»i in w ftxr ae it i» la •«*•

So a thlfVf aata V «*t «b«r«l<y It l« la •cu '*^ l» <»l«ft^

that th« flrat tidsg ^g *lAch tfco iwi^ llt«» l« tfa« «»«»1» '^

a» Xif •»?«»• ttiro«# Wlow «>i»*tlow In W^a aaalfold

doiMao of livta« tolas* *»* ^•'•^ ** ifflaarlUf i?«rf»"»

oaeh of thaaa n%A aatieoa la *fca ooaX, ?ar St. ^wsaa «ia

,oul la urn ^rlawy i»rli»lpl« of oar iawnal«a»t. fa«ll«« aa4

loeal aowaa»k» It la aa «aU ^*a i*rlo»«af *?flitoU>la ahara^

wa aa^arataoa. tiwthar thla prtear/ i»rlneli»la ba caUad tJiO

„rtalloot or tha lnl«Uaa*a»l awl It la ti^a ft)r« of %ha tx«?.

Aa a aaUar of faet tha wOjr -QT y«Hi aaa a^laln ho« thla or

^% am anAarataMa la to mUtaln that tfea Intallactlta

prlwJlpla la Ma fftt^ Qm9me»m%ly, tm tba «ipatatioii of

tho ifttaXlaet It i^^aara tliat %ha Intallaotlra prtw»lpla la

(80)

«il«aa to ttoa V»^ aa Ita for*»

in tha ^n-^- . . - i^t. ^a««aa tfca ao«l la aarti a a**-

Page 114: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 115: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

u

•««ae« «hos« tov; •«i«ae« dtmaem th«t it %• th« tarn of a te^«

fl» natural Inolteattan to tJ» to^r i» of *fe« wry «a««aa« 9t

tlM aval ItMir* la point «f tm% Vtmt Is thi« aatoMl 1»-

cllmtlon %o anion •1th th« %»4jr iMMwe It iB t3*t ttMcno* of

th* wwl to y^ «" e fW» Of tfco *»4y» »t» «»9«M replies to

an ofc4«»*10" ' '' '' ^ " **** flroa tfeo^

Aaj|;ayt fft »%» AU «»t tfcO btOBM

«o«l to not o fom Imd^ t oao ohl^

io totftll;-V - - — - -- rfootlMU Boaoo

oathlns otoado In tho ««g h&tim ooiw b U not

1^« oot of • taSsm ioot, th« »oal l» la Itoolf, ooeopd-

jbag to It* yvts ooooooo* t&o font of tbo teOjr*

Coainff nw» to tho oooobA latorroUtod olosiont la Itto ooa-

oi»tijn of tbo oool »• «iooo»or « -ow«il»« ^lototle'o

jaw, ..

,

tfV&o Ohi^ Arlotot ^ 1« CbftiJtor '?*o of tho oooonft

*Wit of Ifco »o * *^* ^Ich ho Intondo to do

m oonnaetloB vrlth tho ooul In or« r«Bi>08t ond Itt onljr oa«

r«Oi»«ot, It 18 tshioj 4«flaltli>n of *&• «oul lo to t>o dtne»->

gtntol. It 18 totaigr wdifc« it In t^ ^- oo tho dofUUtioa

of tho ooal •111 l»t feo 40B0 -«n9*r«tlon b

Page 116: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 117: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

47

eorpoma •«««• «* fonMt

U. »•& Milm wt i^rtwiB princlplam ntm&i hXa n,m* flfoiti

Fo» St. ShMM tbia d«Mfiffts»U<»ii i» auaftttijr « ii»»t^lorl

19 %!»• rom of • lt»iB« ^^ *' ia «« ^iaelplB of tti« ««*•

prtn«li>l» of tht »ark» of lli^ ^v ia aot ftatt t9m of • llt««^

%ft<|yl"kl« eo«r«»« ijoottloB e» «i «mit»tir «•» •A»an««d iff

St* JkWmtU

Tte mra 0or»»ld««mtto tl««»B* !• tfeo i^otiUlltjf of ft

doftl dtfinltlon of tb« »:: . ^* ftlnt»ta a

twofoia definition of tb« aooii flret. a «oul «e It is

mltoolie . of tho t«»l •• f<»£ . «^?. ?«

«t« ThwiM two U »n lf|>o»olWlt oltafttlon. i» tie i^

Oft* e«mot aoiatoln tl»t tho oaooaeo of the oool it ooo tliia«

af)6 tbo oooi M «wffl la 00 f«* M it plojro tho ;M^rt of « fsrw,

i« aaothor* iT»t ^»>* *»»• •'»**^ •* '•"* «ccia«it!»i to

Page 118: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 119: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

at* Ub«rt

m

th« •••«»»• •f *^e «oal Itflflif* &B««t«r, It i» l«iSltt«^ f

Alttlngoish l>«t^«ea ta* TOttl w» witoitftwte «WJ *fe« •^^ «• ^'w*

aore In It tDM • 41ttia»tt«a >«*»«•« tw points of tioo «o

^O OMM t6«Btioa «M«I1M»

Ft»r«i«ri it io ao* l>o«wo« «io ooal !• f*«« a,a> t^ltm te»*

It !• oWo to oarrtto «» 1>i4y *a* >owia»« it l« » aatei«t«nt

•alMtaao*, h«fiit$ iti owa •a»itaotl»l «*•• mtvrwt, tl*t w^b*

•toRoo iowinim «!• *wiy i* »o»iiy ««£ *»^^ » ^»^ fcoo««»o

it i» tbo vofy Oio^oo o* **« oool to l»o form. For «xt«^U*-

ficotioa of two tsoni to » »a«» !» te«ow aoaotfcing. Ho aafeof

9«iia«« not booMOO bo is on mtAmX tat Immbo ho io r&tioml.

B«t ooob of thooo, aniORl o-att r«fction»l# io oooowtlol to idMt

It ooo« ooto to 009 tfeftt thofo io & roftl ^ffor««oo osmI •

t.«»l oppooitlon oa t^«io pol»t fcotwoon St. Mlart ontt n* 1l»»o.

8t« M^ovt oad ^t. msmm oofo aMntoro of 1*0 JSoadfliooa o«Aor»

mt lm«lt« I»«to» woo for ti«o w.. ^^.il of St. AilMvt oM

«M ia oiooo oontMt »itfe hi« l»th ot colo#io oatt »t »«rio»

it U ooorooiy eoncoiwl»lo tl»t oooh « a« %»*• potitioa

^ «l^ otbor oa this pr«ois« problem -.j « of <tffolro

«»Us into logitiEato douW sad i>o is! OJ ^«

troAit^iansl doctrinal liiioo«o t 3t» AlUrt oafi St. ^ftoaoo.

Page 120: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 121: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

t.« Albert

IRm Mialjrsis 9f theoe faWtttMntedl;r ammmmut; «ltR)«iis In

th* phlKwophar of Silt* Altert «liOtt» Wt* mii? to tM» point In th«

di»safl8i(»a» timt;

(i) UNtt u%» AllM»rt tb« bROKtn toal« In e«ntVR^istinetto& t» tM

tmtm ^9^4eh are oetilj faraw* Id an asaaatlalljf aylritoal saW

•tanoa e«i>ar&ta gaemaaw »«b» ffoai tba !w4y* upwMPav a«^ a

sosa flajra the part of a foxta in r^igunS to tlna %ai^jr in so fair

itii it ia Hio aarfactio or aotaa eoraoriii*

(£3 St* llb«rt*8 intarx^ratatian of tha two dafisitiona of 1^0

aoiU eee^rdit^ to ^riatotle ie of ^viovsnina inapiration*

If .<vlc«ra» is i^rifitotlo in p9%n% of fact in thia qaoitiwi of

tbo aoolt 00 ha ia fcnr st* Alport* tji^on, va& oaljr ^on^ ia st*

^IDort an Ariatotalian*

(9) Thm aoul io tho oalwtaatlal turn of tho Wdjr «& io uaitaft

auAotanti&ll^ to tho body ia tfcia soasa that it is aataral

for «M aool to OBt«rtttin ita tBeUnaUoa teoav^o tbo ^mOiy* It

ia OttliOtantifti onl^ Doeaaoo tlio iaoUaatl % %§»?»

aaA ttoat ii^portaat , ts&* iaollnation i« t of t^w ooaoaoo

of «iO aottX 00 « »UL< -— ^. ^ - >•

U) 9t« AococUaO to H«*tOft ^ Al- ' rt. aMmae* wlt^i

St* Asig<ttatiaa and hia nuUo&l i i ~ Utoaiaia ia

tho piotur«t it teooMt l«W0w . . >meeti!ia;

link la tbo raaiii of iat<i r^^* ,'-^. *'

« totino

Page 122: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 123: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»t« Albert

bWMmM WCpliOAltlt*

te) Ml ttot ten ««»• %9i9t% ie cnn^lc Justlfloatlan for aigring

tl»t th« aonrivAl of rlatoal«m la Chrlirtian tho^bt» w^wi&lly

%tona#i the (l«oi2»kiit l»flia«aB« of at« i^o^stieiliio !•» tn this

pMttloo £tiroU4B0 In :$t« AllMrt, ttllgaod, vlth /.riotoklo throi»igh

tho iMo^ffUtonlott of Afiwoui* Hvio ehoold go « longr vojr

tMNSijrdo th« dt9oov««3r of ft a«w SKMlo of oagijiotlolowo^oviowEroloont

AO oet^SMitod tar ryofoooor Bttomo ailoon* imboI^ in tho field;

of the definltlcm of the 6oa.l» ana tovortUi plaela^ at* Albert(M)

t» that oorrent of *•'""'' '^* ""•*'*.e of it» s»»t prowlEent flofes-aieio*

Page 124: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 125: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

51

& XlAltaa wttmUe ---—- «h« pUtanie end A»i»t«^|l«B

dcf^dtlMi* of th« interv«itlan of .4no«ra»

IMS «BI7 reoere- ^ iisrolw thwo 4«fl»-

to idB doflnltlv* fiMPf* ***^^ ^®

«h« rL?ie «©plle*%lon «h»* fe« «*• »^ i* *» *^^ * ^^

^®:t Intellect.

noithor i'lAto nor •

iect In tt'.

Csmm 00* *»l««ina «lnt*lnoA "- -^ —

-

po««r *ttt hio «*• ^ •^'f^ Jf ««

ftB fc^«nt mtelloot a 1b»«IU«1Uo i

fttlsa ox fMK3RB saowlofi^ 1*> ^« --— - -^ —

«« r«ftU«et ta»«U "•

It m» not I -^

d«ftaltlOB8 of tho mal tlMit »t* „_ -

QoMUoiu to Pit intllootao Q^sQW?

On« of Wlo «u?ll«»t Qgftgofoww 3 on th|« pxc.

it to M f^«i» to **»• ^»WR <io rroettti'l: . Ittlr in

oar Motoric*! Inv'

' ^ *»^i» *«*«* «^*^

•B oMutdnotloB"

Page 126: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 127: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

», f,, Joiner&S

j»1i» Albert flr»ti ^losis siltb ft faatUer o1aj««tl<m ftjpto*^

th» «att«ae« of fta «®«n* la*«U«et 1wi«ft «P»« *b« i?ft**W«l

j,f^men th« relation of «i« •«»: > «4e ftttis* ftM of tl«

int<y.ii<Si«>l« to tm in^^nmU '^Hm »«»IU« •p«ol«» «wsc;^i .-

iiil{ to tl» Artat9t»lift^ >l*tSP le wstlvtly ^«»f«otlv« »f

the ««»•• Uk0Pl»* tt.v . -mt<K49t ^« lBt«lIl4jlU«

«^cote» is actively p«rf««tlip» of tht l»t«lleet. In other

«cnNia the efficient Msy of th« •i«<ilU« 0i,.6Ci«« la

rafflolsnt to •as.lain of •tt»fttl«*n« It therefore *^r«-

oloaes Bil «s«wi«« »*^ - *««i^ *«»« *^ "^* **^ tefoM-

tag tfee »en»e, a»» «» i^ «f *^« IntelllglW*

•peeiee la tofered^ t il«et, J^ p^slt ea

ikg^t int«U«et IB 8t*ci. « «=»^e vota^ wdj? Ve to oulUpl^r hb»

neeeetttflly the eleaentB la isatare. Bat a»tttr« doee not

oentain itt«leee prlneli)le9« Henoe ttt«re l« no wfih i^rlneliJle

1*1

tM en ci&^Bt latelieot la neture*

St. Alb»% teverer diiegreee oa iteie wry point. ^o»

hitt ae«M of tfee MsMlWe epeolee lu /e per ee entt ee««

•re not. aie l«tt«r require en . active.

S»t id^eldtiev or M»t ^e;? ere aotitre ix^r ee aa©o not enter lato

thle QAMtlon teoe ^^ act oa the

««ae^« w.uj' act in tlMdr -^, . .* leer*

oelvee tl» t" ' ^» Come^aeati^, *«

Page 128: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 129: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

on «!» 8«A»««* '^im tmam. t» ftte»t 8«»8lW« «;3«Ji«« «ar« aa*

jgta «w«iit I.. -^ -^-0 o%iJ«ot« anct l»cfia«« of thl» th«i3r fid

t»% vtA MMMt Mt «lxfla aaft If ^<r arc aot ia th« ••a»iU«

otiJ«cta. dwn «« ta M^r «»t ttwar dW •«* »a tfe« ^a»* *ar

fttla^stag It fJMMi »ot«BOy *« ««t »« smXt &l8o laivt to m;

titot th(^ oal^ 00 oet if tba ««»se l^sel;. lo ^Xtm&s ^ ac)^*

Obviottoly titio ie ijulto lfl|*08«tUe«

'i!hM tiko ol»joetl3fi ie invellOAtoA Ibotli tn Itself aae «#

on olMtoelo in Ww wo^y m liu. •50* intolleet; for

«Mh of tho i- isMOii oltooifaadto

itooif olont. ^ no <mo »g«* irtii<di

is mUwmlXy «c*ivfe 1» relati U tteo ooMlWee, Sat

%hi« oofiAitioB doto aot I0U t •hero »t oa-

eoantor o i>o««r oi«pftU« of f* . ^i IntolllglWei. ^ao

tbovo e«H.i in tWUi r ' -.^-.-- ^u w« h«f« s««i

thftt tbo iMI»^'^^

cit<t ftrt nno of isieof footing oooh of «40

ii«n«^ ij. tiv •>.:-.......

j.^ in r^iaKl to tbo Intolleet

tho plawtf lOHtly anlvoroally to eorto

tn tht eo$Mit7 of »» «s«nt inttlloct Immwioo OMBh j^hrotftw* U

* porttmOar dotoralnotua, mm If tho oonolUoo aw onoUo

to oot unltwoolk ^'*»*^ ^« 4«»n*« o*" * P»«^Wo

Page 130: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 131: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

13}

dt* Mb«rt imevt th«t he U m% aXvoM in this yMltieia*

In tme% he l« «Mtsrs4 sa tb» anllisntsr fimAvm }^iA^m*9^m» «»%

«Mrtt is m asttit ln«i&t««t« ^t«««tU or oshvm «m mis af

tbs fl»t Md it «M h« «h9 saiA «te« in «v«rjr aa^oM timn tarn

•«m&l ti^«MRt%0 of «bi^ »m U U^» ta mtu^ in «• Kuh mit i0 tii« ptHMgr iMUl« th« 9^tMt is ths swiss anft sffjoiics

wMeli 7»«ag0«s lai things* ^BA» s«eo»d slinsnt is tiHaUA ts

i^t it »iitss» as fttt is ir<isi«d to mttirs* ^aes this is ths

eas« in sv«r? nator* it is t^bsa tatMmuof tlaat th«r« %s tbass

flifffifone^a in the mill itsslf* Hbm in ^s hamn mttaX ons of

tbs diff«e«at sis^snts is ths Intc^lsot Qa» sst oaaja fjsrt «fk«N»»

as ^iS oth«» is tl«t oao sst ogfitft gtejO^ro^ ^35is lattsr tN» is

l^s rngmt i«taUoet«

flits tsxt fvook Axists«is*s as intaa is «hs irsty s»s i^<s}i

ysfi^lSKSd ttis OffssiE^ ioialiilaa «a* liatiB seawmtatots an ^iststla

for ssntiuriffs* It is r«fri'-"'^- -

—''

---^ 'istartlr --

iitm iiiibart so bUthsl^ toss off thle^

L^ -• It is rsfVttritAaf kssatu> ^^, ^- , .

» " '^"' *••tt| it is <iXai%uxU3»g m-

Page 132: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 133: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R* «• VillVt

Mm* «b« vfidiMll? dlv«me int«fs?r««ftti9n0 of it tMA a» tsMai

part in £R^ioiiln^ ^« »MMl on «rhieh is»^ of ih» m&amvX

^lo«oph«n ««r« to wOk In %iM ttOrtotatb omtorj* 0£w. ^,

oaoh i^htloo9p2MM m Alonador of Aploodloiaa, akiiaftt , AifAnU,

ATie«a» onA AvortMo iMia lftlso«r«« w<a it, tat hoA not tw^odis)

ttio 8«M0 i^«nat«* This i« 00 tvuo ttot »« ore oaiprioM to

«iooov«r J»t. Allwrt in tho n««l l««o«b anlntiiinias tlt«t ^«fsoeo,

i^Mtfiw Afiototolo^. is Of tho s«M nos» iwaol; tbat 1b snjaa

tMM io AH s^ont and » poseiUo intoUost* k ar«li«fn»yo« ho

osaro AliwaMl. i\l&ln&i» Al«9Mail«r raft ^vioonao* in foot &U tho

(6)

i^MlMMMTt* osy iti« soiM thine*

St. Alport »i««oiAo to otMR^oa H» position t>et wtlonm*

It is A ftkot tlMit oovtoia thlBst MM iato set onoo th^ »fo loo. #t

fioiB 90t«wy« f» Mosant for «iis, 8oe««liifie olrso^F in o«t

is aooasA. Ttm possiUo latoUoot ootsss into sot «b«n m>m^

^mim i« ioMMBi It las boMi <a«MB«d fMW j^tsmy to sot. conso-

«»Mt2jr, tills setaallsins dovelot;«Rtt osn only tako pUoo tkrooi^

tho offlolsnsy of soao powor ntltih i» a»t «nl^ in seta tet tAiaH

also oxiets as an agms. ?bis is the reason "MbixA ma ^oitin^^

«a agoat intilleot*

Tho too lln« Solatia vliloiii follows is tfeo nsot HiStAS^UKB^

s«it«aoo In this eurtielo* In it Cit« .absrt io noith^ aa»««^^

%ne olijoetlono nor s^^oaUag to aatboritiss. Bo Is eonoisoly

Page 134: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 135: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B, 0, StUlSt. Aib«rt

^..««^ YT^ tut^lwta* mama majwamxit^ tit in mJm* '^tds

4Mi0Oin»t %«xt oon^tn* %bv«« Mijot «ltiMUtai

(I) ^« Asrcrnvxt vttb «M '*mtt»«iti««'« tiittt th«r« 1» wa

«(l«nt lnt«ll«et«

(a) fuot «h« 4Mf«nl iiit«Ui»t U tn tfe« hanm «ml*

(3) I3iftt tb« «e«it intttllMt la in «fo» Mol inat^raaltUrt o*

^dfl^ it th* MM tbiiis. «hat« is * «rttv«»Ma «^int intClleet

In th« »9al«

ffiM ««plita»«lc« af th« thix4 tlaaMBfilt re^xiMt wur i^watti^attiRtion. Onea t« baa ^a«a aUrinad tht fIraK tw alaoMUta

will ^ 9f lltUa « aa troiiKLa*

fto Aaati9»ia f3ia aaaa* IndaUast aa oalTeraal iimltraa

«w nation of a antvara* of ta** aart. Ttam If «a af« ta

dataraisa what aatrt i» ia aaft «l»Mi it mmm *• tm% *» %««a to

l>r»ofa fot an fts«at Inl^laat af a tatallir tftffatv^ «*«»••

St. Aiiart valaaa ttea tiaaaaai^ h* tmU tlMra la for pi

aa aetiva p«l»alpla aoA • j^aaiU* $nmi»l* in tha

irha raaaott for ^la la tnaA a«sli jtfeiiir'' — ^ ^

«v««y nat«ir«» mA alaaa tlaa aaol is a aertain aaftatav

th«a« pyinai^4aa mmt m In «ha saol* i^ «3wai^la» I "i

aa aatlva In rtfafan ^**i fan»i i;

Page 136: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 137: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

V9

fio^t^ «hiu i&« wfttt«r la tfa« a»ti<R<# »• ««• wwil*! «»*«*

of redaoia« 1fe«M prinelplew to «M j^«iiMM^l« •SSSSSJ^Sb

telKOvio* J» •«• »i»ttl4 MOf <*•* ««»• *» »rta«li>l«« «»i4«*

la th« owa •»• tu«r# m •«»• Ae*«aiy tboy Atttor in ••

fw M itio OBO •9&X 93dB%» i» ttUHm ^ ^« lB»«llla*lW«o

te«h at onigo Mift aoMimtai Vtt% a»t ox oonwo ia «l» mm

m^« ^)0 iBtMtt oota* i»* wUJJeo othor oplMMraa •t tlio eroatoA

niviwa !• » totoa porraotga injoyinec «» • •U»«*««»

prla©ipl«« in ItooU* It i» fitting «*t oil o^arato latolll-

^•Beoo novo In tbm»tiXtm vim% la aalT«raallt«r a^:<na wA liiat

is DoaslMl^^^U, Aiiwtfc 4» tlAf tasrt* «lw8 «• tha eaa to

tha >olatlo» of tha pi*Uin» «Ml*» ••i^t aafcatantlail^

•«9Wtt%o fwai tha tatfjr, Iwa a oalwraaX ogant tetellaet; what

It aoat al^ftaanft la tlP^I tWa teasMi ao-oi la hare link**

9itk tbt aap^ta inUUiffwaaa* «• fcata not fiur ta «• M^ata

«o ooo irioara this la laaAlag oa*

la any «alfaraa» aajra i*t« Ai%«rt« «^«ra th«ra a»a atrtaln

tblsca itoiak aia mOf a2& **^ ••*^'' ' *^ i£^ ** **^

M og<Btla. thata mat naaaaaarll; ba ar t bela« i^l<tfi

io |i^«i^ oaA aB«da« alaa* aaab » naeaoalty la l>ai«aaA tgr

tM aanOltloa of ttOBfi ia tha «iivar««t vm mat go %aak t*

ono flrat a««ia «hl(^ la tiM Bgtawi a«a»»a aa«o intaUaotaala

Page 138: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 139: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU a* Killers%« All)«rt

or ^oA* ^iw rtiile thlo M*ura to a ?t»»t .««it of tot«U«fe»l

2«iAS !• *»*»• »*' ***• «»i'«»« ^* **• **^» ** ^* w««te»«l«w

«v«t »f «iv o«« oittor whioh m9 Mm pwrt ftf «»• '^ole orwtM

ttsiT^M* In fcay <m« Otf^er It Is ii^tMiUm «»i ti»r« «• •

vtissm •• » p»laoli>l«« nimnU le & vwfilirtwo on * oaftU

Mftlo* H«ice, thofo l» in B»a « ^^gjiwaa »g<B« ithlch io «%«

as«(tt iatftlloet.

It 10, thorofaro, nMMOMiy «hii« la «M iMMa »•«}> ^«iP«

1M -tao dtffetwt pilnolploa* oiio yAAda io «m«»«»ait^iiwr •awwi

ijBffmt omiA fieri. ®t« "tmitwoo'* «fe««i»e*«p of eaa iro^otroi

t!At thoro h9 tSD. o««it iat«aioet la «w ••«l« p^f^otUoiwft, of

eo«r»«* to tM tiJiiMi of uaiTOVEo to ^tbi^ tlU« IntollWtail

Cl3}

Mia« eellodi nm l»6lonr^*

Suoh * proof fiwp th« «al»t«c« of sn ««•»* l«toU«t is

mlj wild lJ««a»o MBM i« » iftiaor. aacaug* it ia oolol^r is

Tirtoo of tiiO fact that ma l» a ftdxuat maUm ti»t ho ho* «a

•gOBt intoll«et. Hlo 1« » true that if tho doctrine of

ttmx a« a mio»ooo»a w«po toitOB jtjkwb at« *UUirfc hia opi«to»s»

ft|«i7 «Ottl(t 00 oliera of ita lntelXl«siHlit?* It it net

Aiffiealt to «• ofeat St, Alljort lo mitiag at for be tollo

as bljMOlf* i^Ton in tiio aniTorso of atrlotljr iMiiporoal ^Aag^

tiioro io ono firot m^mA «hloh offoato thlJMja ««a«r»t«4 thMtn

Page 140: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 141: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«• 9* 8tU«» 59

it i« ih« ll^t of «b« •«n* D» thin ilg!it of th« aim aatf Hg^a

tt do4*ti li#t eblaoo* t&«rii7 MWtwrii^ it otfMtiYo in odue*

ic« tbo ootp«r«»l foxBst* ttattM «« U^it of (Sod ««r« «ia4oA

«• tlM li^ of tt« vm th« l&tter ooul^l m% i^oot «h« «%«»-

ial forms*

la this r««tp«it tbwo it no Aiff«ratM« in any oaiTWSO

oa« tMtt aoRtion* t^o the uRivosrM ii»ie& bma is for «Mi|4^

in tho oool of ! > sianifOid kaooiodeoo «kieh ho m^ h$m

oro offootod )Qr tho li^« of on ogont intoUoet. If tbo oooot

or* «iM oaao thio ot oaeo i^ftlioo thot tho oeost istolloet io

aotiillo vitfaoat t^ li^t of ooe to •itmt its ^tatt is tlao ooi

of kaoviix « ^at tl»t cnot roooio to bo ooon* tiko peiol «0

Mko ae« io tt»t tboro ouot bo o tmivonoi ogont intoUoet in

tiM oool Hoowioo awt io offlfrfflf irTTtr <?«•*••«« U|^ of

tiM ooa ohinoo wiivoroaii^ oa tetb fkotivo ontt &ooaito twiap

in «M oorld o»A m 9od*o ll^t oabmwoo oil Ho ma»t oo in

tbo itoog awXtei nmf tho univorooi a^mt intolloot pwtfro

f<wth ite Infiuoaeo teth oo foiwo anA oo^ on all tbiatfO ia

tho pwucttluir univ^«o i;^ tMah it io ^to ifHmm »fmm

ttajvwoolitor* im aetivo j^ooof «booft Oi»«i«tioa roaolioo ftoa

tho top to tho tettom of ito o^^horo neto laiiToraoUjr* ~»«^

tito ««ont £»riiu>i|>lc of Vt,^ intoXloetiiAi sool io to ^o tmmi

onivoroo irt)Ot i3o4 io to t2M obolo ao^aiflMot oyvoyr of orootod

Page 142: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 143: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(14)

Ifeti^* '^'-e notion df r. sdcroe«>iM iqpU«8 ft r«l«tioa t» a

la %iv« iil«nc9as is wOjr « amll-Male «o Ihsw ia

^« nirtvesitre fts a '^»l«i* "^hla aeww for •. o <%>la*«»»

i40jP OS ^t* Albfiart is fiRiljr tot«U%i1i49 i,ii v^«9 ]Li#t of M«

0S«niols«7« ^ if «l*i 1« 3>inir Oft in lufi is niot fxnUks v^t

it «sixi$ on in th« «liOl« wtversts «• oto v«i4xir«i to go* wltli

s%« Aitort «B oar ^tlo* on a m^id oi^t'^oseias toitr of tlMi

onivonM of vtxicd^ tve ure onljr naw a port*

l«(uu3ae St. nisert sees Imw SttiteU* it is %o

004 tgm Httoa tae oaiv^rse ^voooote meA on wtioa It 3

it IS nooossMar £iHr as to sdO|>t tho sens stftttin^ j^inU

904 is th« first sffinoiitio kbA osaso of oil tht* ^» o oasb

Ho to 7«f "^i^rroooo ooso« mis is an a%soi%to asossoi^

^«r«lQr tasft Aoi^onlo on notidng m&fmmm taa^mtim or oteor

ts ai^thln^ thsro is in rfi» a eoa^^lote Isok of m9 s>ossiUIl^

or oen'un.^^wii^* ii<s^o» »« see Bis t^»al. laao^oaAOQeo bsth to

Ofoato «r not to ersato anfi in rois^oot to thinp oiroatod*

SWft » first i>rlnei?l« of aU thiiw* is o»o, lnoo»por«eJL«

izidiVtstUo em vaams^ii iwviog BO offlot«*t» fOKaal, flml(U)

or aateriia oaaso Bo too nothing to «otsa«t ttw Bio noeoosi^.

St* ^^ort ooaeoives tt>o i^todaotion df th« m»UL tgr OoA sAiO is*

aijiBOlf« ncesssax? and siMi2^1«» as prooosfliag f»m Vm griaMj

Page 144: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 145: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1, a, iflttuwfil

117)

io ft <;>ture as« to «lmi &U potimagr i« iftaf^i^^* ^

«3c4tus into oadst^neo of «>•* t*»loh oo-'f? -----^

(10)

fhliiAi fUwIag fson «m rixot pvoooott ooeosMiag; to as

otdor of «*««»« oaA soft of tl»o« >*& ri90% tnt<sllee%a8

igiiwgooXitor fti^ oa]^ «Ho luift «9a»«ita;ifeo« takings s)Qr ooUvol^

:«anainet ma ooltt^ iBtoUl.; * ^ kaowi f.

oed wmotttatoo tho gyttawa erofttuab '^»% tint t»«l-^.. ..--

ia a £>aro Xat«Ut8«»o« one 9xA ols^lo. la ttiio ooboo at looot,

t&iit 1« has ao aatovlal •ODoUtnont*

fiho flro* Iirt«ilt«oi»« OB^oyo a tfaroof^U rol«ti<»» fU»t»

«• a«« fimi vliABi It eoaMi ooooad, to itooll SSSSSlSmM..^eSL

Pitt and thlr<3l, to itoolf in aa aaeh aa it la in aototttta at

li^Lng oy oihilo* Is ao far aa it knooa itaoXf a« Aentiae

twm 304 it haa naeaaao m»%m but not ataolatol^ aa a»4. It

eas alao know i^olf eoao^aaa i4t cuoH oat aofl to aa «te» oa it

10 to 90t«aasr aaft ok ^ilMio* :*a aot tv t*doh It knowa itaolf

aooOTiaw ifl tfiott oat oaeawlo>a tbo oool of tho hi^oat ai^ovo

i&t tbat tri^ch ie to piK^oo of a ooulf iMlo tino oat V viilol)

it tenava itaolf aa to ^,...... -Un anfl cs nlhiXo 4«w«»fla tliat

aoM«K(il8« on tho oloo of ooi»tttatod oaa tliia ia

tho firat hoa^on or tho art > «»• hi4M»* ooloatial

Page 146: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 147: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

••If In «*• l«*t tiw 9t !%• ilaw* r^lftHowi osn^UMt l*» 9m

wimr «ntv«M«, «hif^» mas% «o <j^4, !• «i» bi#i«H iwrt of «i«

(20)

BKflim •%««r?«A liiw »^ Al%«rt etmmvtts the ••toUiitent

•f «!• flr»t o«i«p «» »«»U»© «J*t %*• fir«t of th« «h»«» »-

HfttiMW in ttrt rir»t Zi^«llis«nM Ism i»% yet eoaa lat9 ^l^j?«

tti* A9t Bf vtitcli «tls ftnt lHt«lllg«ne« tamm m« First €••••

«teo««ti «lMm it i8 tt««lf nea«nMh«y« kaoi^as iteelf to b« twm

thftt ?i»t Ciia»« «»i hm»* knwfiag ••M«ldLAs of that ?iwt Gmmm«

gl«B rl«« to an inf«flojp Int«Uifi«»«. *M Iat«liig«n»« of tk*

••eond ordor. £ut this ••conft lat«Uiein»« «Rjd7S ttM Mm

tl««t r«l«ti«B«« Ctot •»»• t)i« astiwaiaft hftre )»•«« ovl «i» th«

fwst diftioolt ptat U «on«« 1^ vt in *fe« «Blv«f«t h^^i^mm

tA «b« tasie «s^ th«M t)i«w» r«l»ti«n« doainat« th« fa^]A»»tion

•f aU else ia «Wi worifi* 5© tb«n, «i« mi% ^ ifeicte thi» mkmhA

lntoUis«aao lsa»w itMtf ••oanftoa jq aoo^ »gt «Q««aae«^ «i«

P9«aiattt« afttor of th# ••eonA ^;>lt«r#| «b« cot «liot«tliy it kMvt

ltt«lf »s it is in ;:ot<^a e(»i«tt^ito« th* •<«o»A aoUl« tmsm*

imH(f*», this •••om Int«llis«»« vtili hfts to tcnov it«af la

lt» first relation, nftsdy •» it l« B«e«»ftry throogfe «x« ?i»t

C«imi «b08« •fti«ciM li^t turn ar^etl^r tiiroagh th« «tei«

ord«r« K«r»« ly kanwi^ th« First c«a»« *ar •boa it io iieo«M«f3r

Page 148: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 149: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* AlUrt

ta it« t^-iva la ^)Mt«iMd sf lb« •<«>« ^t«e relations*

30 it 0»«i OS ri^t <lann to th« M^tre of th* omb^ «v««y-*

^dae ti^a pl««t 4a«t m It «ild In ^.« first lat«lli^[«BM«

3^ Int«Xitg«r»3« 9t Htm fg^htrs «f «>• mm «8ae«a«r« & lASt

purs lstslllg««« in «^ ast Iff tB&i<tfv it iraom itaslf m «»•

easai^ In 'kjil. This last l]st«Uie«aft« tntttad of m^eO^i

t^i» aottif aot »oul of e »i>fe«r« »hin« oa wad InfliMWSW ths

atd^om? otilYoroo oa v^U M tbo soulo of bku la •«««?•

at. Aitjwt a&intaiaid that tfeoro »•»• alofoa lataUigoBooo,

t«a »x mm «ltfe haawaa of teoir o«m« ^m oiotooth has a»

it« dooittida tiM torvoatial vorld of aatlve mai paaoivo

i;tR«raH« and eotT(t|^tiM« thtas**

iit. Mbart wao santwjiuea ^Mt)i«f tfea hmtma *f «a»«d

^ a oool* a afttaiPO* at aa iatoUiffwca* a»«a» » e«»fc

at lesat 18 eartaim Isotaaom «*« latoUigaac »««

tfaii^a ta ooootaiug ae » viri^aoli^l* ^ aotlo«« '^'«* i* !» ^« *^*

nat pn^aroS to m^ la tha Libor ao {imalQ et >TOCgoaa

?i*it'?«rsttatis. iJt* Alb«rt»o oolatloiv to tMo tfifflctUty la

inaip^aoic ivxn Ma i^altion on ttoa Iat«Ula«B»« •» ^^a^««

L«t oa ttato tho pfUm la thoaa t«> aojraj flwt. at. uym*

i« aat laalino* to teUofO that the X»t«ills«Boa» ^»

ew tho rcasao tl*t fiavOUtioa and Faith toMh ^ -a it

Page 150: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 151: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8« a« ullltT H

(SO)

a» wait. «b«r«» ttlnott all «ic riaiot^lMMr* mlii«Ala tl»t t^

9y^ >c»« t9ult »B «<dl an joilttiiixgmcmm

xM ^ftj^t* et soot oftiMCsM ^.« roooaollablUl^ of

S^loaophlGal aaa l3&«»losU«l toeioto* In « m^sflitlomtl^ lucia

tost of tb« ^>uiaBft do cr«w!ttqrlg J»t« Altert oolvw U>th aspoato

of fSio i»o1»l«i9* Ho oOaito »it)9h tb« iod^nU timt %iM tim,tma

hMTo 90 «ota» If IQT that is motit oadolatthia cor^^rla oggMaiel

giyelcl gotaitle vlt«a ha^ontlo. whiiA to tho ayopylo gatio

of ooloa* j>t* AlboH «oat» no oonUodietlv'm bot»04)a Ifeo Saiittt

««& tho i'biloooi>h«rot furtt^or, feo do«o m% foot tJiafe t« ^BjTf

At loaot in tht »^m9 of tMo |)>voUi«tt» la ordef to ioH§ tNA

on a hazanntooo teoio It la truo to •«. ^rtaln

lis«oUis«»«8 in tho otbo ooalouol^ &< '<i 1»

tlio fotion of tho»« »r^# . -», -^^ *>« oallfA aaJg^- - - :

bat thio ai»i>olation U not entvoaal «ii& tbo ootOo af acn

boaaooo thi^ know aot thxoo^ alMrtaraotion txtm ghantawiit ^t

Ity tiamliis «y>«r ooaemttow oooBi ao tho Uteor do ca»ioio toils

Page 152: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 153: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« a* MU1«VSt, Aitart

«it ana as appatlte* tlMQr «vt i»i x«l«t«ft to tikt ftrlMi it* «iii

<y>iii<8>^i» i»ri»ri» »r/iBmet atiyatcl aotustla tttaa halMwUt^

Hut «n tBt«licetQ»l »alMt«HO0 wJ»aft iii1»U«et it tli* Mt of

M iMtdj^t •ii»e it Wjr »9«0»t« vtthBut e tM(jr «»r ooijpanftl

•f9i««c i» v«Ut«A ad •««»« Just M ft jpUtft |» vi&ftt«d to a

•hli^y I^Mtl i« to mt0 \)jf mnns »A fnUie^ It initio ir«mi»>(£0)

Sae aakotftntlell^ oiotinet fi^oet it* 'Sum it {^itoara titot th*

Iltt^]ll4S«aoo» in ro||itl<n to it» out toA ^s» rmtim OiT that

or1)» ia aaalogoua tt ttit luaaAa iabciieotuaJL diKU in ita sm»

iati«m to tii€ banaa Dod|r« In ttda aanao at laoatt tJftat taab

|« otaantiall^ mA aaowiiaw «t»0 aai^avato, althou^ »^at«a

la idMt ms**"— a j^iiot to ma ahlj^* At oaoo vo aao 1m«

vital »u Albert's atand «& %b§ mal ia to Ma aa^^laaatioii

of «r« a^p«a«tallnul ot«nta» Ttuly nan ia a aiaoy awgiaaa*

Par tida taiion it ia ^caypar to oaU tba XntaUigaaoa tho

a«a and aotoy oylaiei« if aa a£«eii;^ tliat v« 4o aat omfnaa

tbaraV sau and )iia aool* Boa aM It ia tint »t» U^Haaa aMa ta aaltra tha et9Tal«a £0» himalf tor adajpting aas

tba «lera(K»am to asQr imm oalaatlal wnivarBa* it la odd

Wnmao tlio apPileftUon la auida altb tba aamloir 9Bit ta

aonfaaa lAuit aattiaily ^ava tiao tm tim oilidaal aaafaalaa*

So It aaa Iba aaid tii«t l^a ia«BV«Ba tiava aoulo If aaa

Page 154: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 155: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

S* Q« MlU«rSt. All)«tt

•M «lM>«t aU th« i'hlloso^kluHni pmtAX i«Uit ti^t«t li^MspM^^^i^B

«btah h« hlmB«lf gav*. s •»« la lattiRtftliiiA Itft^tm t^e i'lKUo»»»

pk«p« aad 1^« :*inta| «i«re 1« w eontitiJlGtlotw irae» th»

l»t««ir 6«altd aottXs to tiu* h«Mrttui» )»t this 99M oaljr ft aMdaal

«ta!l^ite %«Mnt« ih« ^inta tkM im «»fM»«io« of ti»« t«M tOm

i^plioA to the hittfcao for th« ooa.fb<^im out hmmaAwUm *t ^t)k«

i^towroo <i^lch It vKnld nioo in *tiM nSMUt of tho faithful* In

point of fftot howevor tlMff 4o oteltt tuod ri^tl;^ «o» tjtat oor-

toln Xntellijoncoa or *\n^s Rtorvo tho lMav<» at tho oommcmi of

004 and aoocNTdins to nio ^Isiu H«nc«, hamiMg Mired ^ -iaA

pluMO of tbo problae 1^0 first ie oottotuvcntl; ooltroft* ..^^

ZRt«lliipe»eM aM AagCls and oortain oma (^[taaadMii aova o«r»

tain h«nr«na at Sod*B 9mmmaA» It it g^ oaall cxMMnt liiieh

Angola pavfora ti^wa faaatianai aavtaia it la tbat 80«e of

«!«« te aoA thflor am what the i hil«M^«ra oall Xntalli««Beaa«

at* Al%art haa a*da Hia point*

£tt« ^llMTt la folljr aaara tbat, mnot^ng la Catlolie

thoolo^ oartaiii imgA* aonoanr in tha laaa of aa^ura aataV

UtfMA aBoovdin«; to Ifea JDivina i 18»* Ha ia not aloa to in*

fura oa tl»t aa a Phllooophar «iui ia a (^ttelie ho io not

oaBtiBdietine laiB ftRith )»g hdlding that ABg^lM eooparata ia

0f9iag and govntrniaf tha i^kaafm of tea haayoua* Hwr ia it

Page 156: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 157: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

t* dm MlU«r^« AlbMTt

«f

hlttMlf MSA iJ« ;s»la^ •»• imgAM» ©an !»• «»U«a w^ffff,*!? the

MO iat«p»«teUoiw ttt;. xiicoft eoD«6«» ti m tJ»* <**« «>•

Sftlnto "-** "fftrr" ff^"F" •»- •«*«»» ^*»^'^ ^*^^ ^*"

ooeo^tlon f»» «art the hwBMiii W «wifa#t to bs aaSaafe* mA

ttRl nalo in the »«»« 1b «ia«b awn Um a «»al owi « lio«y» m*

••^ 'ffl'*^ •*•»• •" «* trtftl. oao«, bawff«, »• «a4*r*t«QA

ttidr f«fi« »od tel» i«fee?pr«t»*l«» st« Allwrt i« «qwflae«d jrf

1^« 9«M«na wMnidltar ^ot'^eoo ^tfe owm^ on Him* ipei&te*

It i« •till to immAw lwwr«r tJwt st. All»»t f«el» biw

••If at OM »lth tli« rhllwi^few* «» the relattea or tbo

Itttelllgioeo to i*o ot^ lio eo^ooiall^ aeatloao A«io«n»« It

MMM ]te»«ov«r tlsftt feo fUlod to tatEO into aeootnk tlio foot

^m% ^i««n» did hold for on xntelUgiweo agd * «oul» .l»*

ttguiOm *ko ooal oad aoklfig tiio latoUl^waeo porfom tfeo*

fMwtlm^ as a pilot In a oidi?» oo hate »t, Mfe«rt»o eolaltiofu

St* AlWrt oS^l7 a*»ano«o AtieeBBO as an aotborl^* Fot the

sake ef hletortooi aeeawtejr «o *oul*i waUoo tuati Ane«ffla»e

(ai)

teerte trtll not oiia?Oft each m alleglMioo. Shat «»o hmtmt

inu m ooul b«5?o«l tt» lateUlfiOwe Is a <IoetrtBO taa#* ^f

Avovrooot ^* Albert kaOR thlo ^atum he wolo hie Saawa do

ISC'

Creatorio* ^rroee «io aotlw prtnolplo of the

Page 158: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 159: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

hMtv«a !• Tso% • f©m of th* «tncui of mtiara, mU(ri»X fiwwai

tiM pftaslple l» In «» «iw»t •! » •«»X (•olaftJi i* *•

QQ^UgggjI^^^^ m« XnteUt^«M« ie in tH« lA»t Mftljwi*

f^T Av«rioM in* flovlas pvteeipl** It «« »• e«iU«d » «»«.

9r «»«n anfmft, t»y nnMn of ltd f«ii«Uoni»^ m • f*r« «»

B^iMR^ It m» not A*l««o» «ii4 Awrg(>m «^ wi»« tfa« •««««•

ft>» Jt. Alb«rt*» doctrln* on thli point, bat only AV«fVO«o«

fium f9» tht OMO la eloar. it only w»to» to dotomlno

,|i««h«r *!»t (-ooo on In wm la tatt o porUoalor e«M of «i»t

it tho OMO In tbi i^iolf iwlv«wo« It lo mUm^ ham mm m

• "f«** f'^hMi «t«it »!• Alport In aolvtx^ f-isloglool

ifflA thooto^ool attwrWao* !»• «ie' « fe t«»rtoBM

f4^07«t« ftoctmdw goto ftoB nm . "'»* oi»«»ft*iv«

la a botl;. Tbooo It hoo iv WMIH of ito Ui "^ *^ '^

nrot Gmm* tl»ou# i«»« It 1» CBWi »« ^»*o« ** ' ^^f^^^*

mm pooora of that ooa o^«f«to ia « beay i J it lo

fho oet of ft MOOS* tho ftwW ••»••» *» e«««»*i*l *» «»• •**>^»

tbo oooobA is «stsl4o Its 'nty «os«ae«« swrntag is th«r«^

-««.-• , . > tho «Xip»«ooi .. - stondo «a^ '(34)

tte li»ia»n of otofidtj and tliM* soeii a eMtMrlson ootoils

» rotation l«th to ohot io otwwal aad to tl» wrtaUo.

Mtv«ptlM« •OlW «f ••«»••

Page 160: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 161: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8U All>«ft

U its sMMallyt M«oaUy« «o ltft«lf awmwtaa Id Kuoa est

mA tb«r« l« an •l««0Ht of pM«ll>lllVt tJUiwUjr. t« lt««lf

in M far a* it ia in^ggtia aM tharain i» to He AmnA

a relation to aattar. B^ lUa an Urtallii^enec oar tmum

•oul ia baoooiaffl

Sat iMforo *• fi»U<nr fwrthav «lon«( tt« ynttk of Intootl*

^«o& nWoh ««•• t«xt« »»»• «»«»•* !•* «» »«e^l»

(I) fhore ia a oaiTersal a,^j«Bt iatoUaet ia teo a««l of aaa,

iiaoaMiitAtaa t^ VM fact of knowing;.

(I) Snob *n agani iitfcaUact ia tha aora mtmtm *••«»•»ia a Biiiot laaaaqa^

(3) fha teatrina of sJt, Alt»«rt on thia point ia aoliOljr «»«*•

ed on Ma uni^ua AafiaitioB of ttea lian^ aool.

(4) Sn ordar to ranSar tha proofa f« Iba exiatanaa of tba

•smt intellaat intAll^Dla It «aa oaooaaftry to i»FO»U«»to

M«N«hias of 3t. All»art«8 ooacologTI *• ^«»« "»* •••» ***• ^***

of it*

- — notion and natura of a« a^jenl intaUaot

ia aoayaUDIa aith la aatora of tha hwaan aonX ia a f*thar

qiMation. An if ao it atUl raasina to rtMW hoa that ao»-

Page 162: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 163: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

90

8t« ^Itark

aw twn Mv «tt«ati«n«

Page 164: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 165: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1, % mum^* Alterl

n

Vtm tiM flMM te»% thvt at» Alber« aik«a ife* qons^M

Uteoat latllcatug tMOB tit aTC w>1b»» It le ml&mt tfei*

M «o« ^ ««ll S9&r« of hit own aoltililon* at, Albwt

h«4 tavmy i^l& tbtM too j^vopotitiotw) first. vm% vm

«CtBk lattllftot 10 ft ffeset of th« rftUanftl wtal^ » oooiiC]^*

«h&t ft part of thft tool la e afttoml p«v«v or faeulV ^^

tho l«Mtm oool* &« fwl«^ of tuo i;«»«r« of th« ooal is

oondltlonoA %sr tiio olvoreilar of i^rlnolplos ^riiloh £co to inko

«p ^iftt 80ttl« «n oneo «• 0iXbm tl>»t tiao oool is not a «l #lf

tot ft 00B«^ite tulMitsiioo oaft f^irtliir« tint there aft la tho

htuw» ooul ooaponoot prlmii?l«o idil^ «08|^o« ttio oxitolo^oal

•trootstf* of thftt «ntltar*

Bttt idtftt ftto these prinoipies of eoi^pooition aat Um

$109 of Idion Mrs thsre? St* illMrt tomw tho p»inoii>l«»a oosi^o*

tag tho soul eaod sst «nd gao sat, or go%«m^ sbA ftot, if one

vl^si to tcdcs tbsn in ft iiiae s«»s«» ^s agsnt intsHoBt re-»

latso to tbsos irrlnfii^fts sinos sit* AllNart tolls os it is ft sww

ftf tlio soal floslag flpoa tho cao ost or ths sot, whils tfeo #oss-

iVle intellsot. liksslso ft |io«sv of ths sottl« aoiss ixoa tho

a<»d ost or potewjr* it is asesssftisr* thsrsforo* to asko ft

Page 166: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 167: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ffwalns atai oS^iUleiuaoo of tht j^ftnoli^oo gawt o»t teta ^ oi**

^MO th» IwMtt aoal Manot Do 4«finoA m a a«« ^mra* ^t

bM to M doflaoa oooontiaU^ m » outetanfio* %h«r« io ooa^derftUo

4iff«MM« WIvoMi ttooti^tlug tho oooX ao o oatetanM •«« «iO

••«a A» a tows of a fcoajr* utttiU«o«i »»• flMlo ap of mUo» «n4

fwau Thiui, «» Oiy %h«l %lit tottl 1» a »*it«i«o liooaaoo tt too

U MAO Of sMKttot am f»f» woaia teto %«aa a tr&AltianaU^r

•U|?l« mttor. f%«yo wtm votlMr pMOO&oeti ^t. Aogootlno «^

slUoa a rpmtaal is*t««r« Tw Hm m^ ewatoft a oj^Hltaai o»

IS)

««1 at a ooxpoYoal aa%lww» Ite SiftlfoXf or « «*• AiWtt oaUo

klai a»8t of%«i Awi»%^mmt iitA aaiatelaett a oo^^icto aatt«r anA

{»f» tbMiy. Ann th» m%%m mA fiom eonpooltloii of aU owatoa

•atataaeoB oao a oluutaoUnatle «M«fta« of mu^ of tho MOiofal

(4) _^M«a8%|nlaao»

$«• Albert, bowofWa alMt^f H^|o«t«A oaeb a poottlon; ia

tmat Ik* ooaM to mot Inm oo« of tho fl»t to 9999— th« oos>»

position of mttor an& fora within tbo eoia itooif* «• kaoo

boo imiatont ;jt, M6«ct i» on tbo ooidl*! iMing a ott^oo^Bm

potfootuA eoii^loto 1^ ttoolf• movo 1« M loogw My rootrieUont

tbo oool io not an l»eOB«4ot« otitetcmBO* tnit* ao •* bavo ote«rf«&(6)

00 dftOB* it io o^paxato iram tin In^ por eaoo ot OBecntiegu

Page 168: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 169: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B. (U Miliar73

vVS'*-' Vf»

amd f*iB 1* twitMM a«c««M«7 *• tUiA tti»tb«r t^p* of

position «h««»gr *fc« •«d «« ^ •W t

the «>8t Mtascti «iy to Ugin to »ltr,

j«et ouflh M at* Albert** ftimA lto«i»t«i«

SowwtM l» • «oago»ito of « »tt«r mA « ftw«»

«i«ro it «t oaeo te^ « oAtter asA a f^m,

soef»t«e it tho T U« ^Jt^

StOfftttt it tht : » *** ** «tfi»i* ^'^l «•»•

yrttitt to mi that ti»t ttol of - ^ -j^ tf aoer 9

fMtt of tho tt«y of aotfRttt fti» In pttnk of f«t tfeo toul

it mi tM t9m of SoeOT*^. It it m^ Jia of tho %t«y

of atotttot* t*t wo ©all tho tool tf -.^^-^-^ it «« ftwra

of oao of tho too p«tt of ohi*^ ^«af i« e

ffiliit it not at all tho ftm u - 5o«witot.

aootatot it mam 19 of Mt te4y, ~ -^- - - »

tho fom of tho tholo "MMg tl» it atoxattt*

Bttt oliat art wo to ttjr of tho lAot

Itovo bit firitn* aooiatot without a t^i

otMM aw* fwr that rtatoa aatt hato a f»»». If tutro it to to

one it mtt bt oiw tuA atoto tba tool at »m of «« *wi

8o«vatet« It thooU M a fom whioh it ^o farm 0:

Page 170: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 171: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

fit. AlhWft

?4

So St. Altevt «m tay «« «** h»«» 1" «» <**• •' **•*

oH^osit* mtotanM h» OftUt :}oemte»« fit&t thi* Im* «• be

at. Al%«rt *«il« tt» i« el««« f»o« th« •iM^l* fact that hgig^

ttftn M pr«dlM««d of ao«»t«o m » otiolt. iio«»»*«« l» • «•»•

16)

liBM tho {mrm toUw «f «fo«i»to« I0 torn*

for 8t. AltMVt tiM tvm of tho ooi%>oiit«» the form totloo

of Jooiatoo i8 tne ttuo eot. whtrooo tho ooi9»«i^« Itoolf U

«>• SaS&JK2l» ^'^^ ** ftllww ««* *b« a»^^ •^ Bftttwr eaA

l^m to ttet eiaeh lo o» «igto—1<1 ^vaA oat. Xt lo tho

Kttib . « •' «»o «hoJif ' >i«

to. It l« t>

In othor oetdo «» g«»t -a %fe» •»* cot of tho

«oi«eoltos It 18 that in ohloh the tnm of tho mt^k^oito

«MPeteeo ito Batumi Miaff.

..A odod «ot ie for st, AilMrt f^o oi^poait (o«pyo»itanU

--•* St. Altort uaaof

that th»o 10 odd© J2SL* f*****^* *•

tbo oooMa mtaro to ^Sah U U ?r«ni«rlsi« It

latHMnaUaUo. i'ao oooara natore roncloroa laAlvUnol In thla

a)«)»oolt In ml «^ch It foxiao an awoa ftal^ le »

Umgtv oUo (onoo thlo aaloft hoo boon offooted) to bo aartl-

olpntoA fyoa thle Inaivldttal poi '^^*

Page 172: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 173: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8%« Alttrt

n

iu)ly «!• q^ m% or ^ifWI »t* Al*^

£Mm«hi«h the flap «t JB* i« »» *f'f^ —— -

(18)

IHPOIUT. Bft«i«r tw» qao fit i» *fc» !*« •t «« »«iy ••••

^Mt«« tt««lf• to t«f«»t. It i» tJ»t «fel^ oan 1» attri^ttA

to tiM tttai4«at* IDaft tta «• >>*«• •««»• Jg^S. ^* ^^ JSJ&JSl. ®>^

f^wMi totHtf of iiooi»t«N mmmnp s«t. Alfeort Mk« It »lf«

«!»« for ma tWL» *• «»t tho aaivorma tbiah it •» **«tr»«t

««n(Mvt« Um%mA •t Wins tfeo ««B«Nd i»tla» of «« 4t l» «

«h« oostnwy that tmm iWfli «! tot^ltwt •Mtrotto «»•

(IS)

wATOPttsl*

ti» •uaot li«tp te

H»M tbm a aBdoamt* r«iU:>^ -

•artain raallom af tbe fomw* la « 4»«lti«i of thla kind tD«

ftm •• ourti JA mn turn • <pMie«»i i««»l it 18 t^t ria« «tel^

tha ««MKal »«ft 1» takaiu 1% %m HWfitaU* ttot la e

atant thara la i^wiUa a s^ " ttdo o

^ora i41l ^ M dUCI«ult7'

« a^totaaoa to aoAa m of «att«r »

viXlL tave both a oattar wni • fm ttA tm/f^m tom"^ -;-r;ii^

totittO, A dootnaa of tho yJ^ufaUt? 9t «W«i wbuI*

oaaasaloaA* It lo aat mv ^oivcM laMMUiMUr to .

«aa llaa af »t« aim^ ' ^ '^ •*** * " *""

"'"^

Page 174: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 175: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

in a X«t«r diMovtloci*

Bam ^tim if %hm% i« a» oattw* m% tvta «tlri«iaiil m%%m

in Mtth •<p«rttik« •atet«n««t tm AngAt (Ml tntttUeetabl 80«l«

Ma«l««F«ft in WinMivw tb«r« is no t9xm 9f tli« pi«t« 3iiM»«

thitft is a» m%t«r th« fsm •£ «b« «ti«4e in eitidii omkh* it tfe«

•M9i«t* attRir* i» Mt, «<|uitrAlia% ami in • oM^plst* wumtr

to thtt fMH« a&t«riif

«

At «• olbserttAt l^s «0(» not hola Sisr

INit«riAX •tMMllWQeM* VhC ;aDt; cot

«» Hkt Mtj^pMit* It is %h«t

is, this rorm, la jBB>iritttAl orsfttotcu ,... ,....::: eet owti^isi

tlis iptsitloa MVlHt fitfSMtrljr iisA* in th« ssdss at lstt8t» that

it is th« sa^Jest* HsnDS «M oid.; (^ i is tbat sf ths(14)

«lpp«[iAt saoA tbt nstors sf iriiiojb tbs tmmvr Is tz „^ ^<asit«

fhas fsr «csai4s S» sn sangt&t 1st ots : l» t^srs is

OS aattsr mA torn «»i@ssitioa| tet the ^t osnplsts

in ss« ceossQoiQtljF :ss|4w«l is s b- --^^.....

..^,. ..^w M«Mi SMMi tins b« is «bt tti ' iwiel. ins

so Sflgsi ws laoroMmt as «.': „ ^ __ -.-taio«

liilessiss in M«sta to i^s taMm soul, at:^.. ^o*^ oas ^Int

of vi««« soA «Kt«Kiall7 to its ssssgasSf it is of its

iMNIjr* it bas in itssif a fsta simes ssssntiali

ssitetaaso si^parats sseasttttw €«ge ^>9" ^^-^^ tio(i^« iiss ia tbs

Ans^ thsrs i:': "^oe no iot" o

Page 176: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 177: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

5t« UMrt

77

«!« iMB 9t that iWlcb h« t» !• »«• »i«i ^« «»«» «»W*9f ^

it or «d«t« ed Also to t&« luwan wil tb«re is w s&H •»*

thas tt« iateU«et<i*l tottl l» at oo» «tt t^ c

(If

ti-ilo (K^a li! c,aoC est antt • soul ^<S cy» ^t.

«tt iln««ai 4ot« oar iatell«ot»»l «oul iMwuwae*

^2»Mi «o Jgt «r fttnaatotiiti coof«f« f

aash as it ia a foroal prlacti»le pl»<^in^ t

it la or «xl0ta «aia t» «liUli tt glTt

d«fialt« apmlm* ^ftofl •»* »A ffy

gtimi»l» ot ona Iftega perf(wtotas l)at lii;c ..— -u-

neithtr eaa «dat «l

vltfeottt tha ftrtpaa toti

tito iarli»ipl« eea «Klat wOjr tlj«ra In tlje^

It rawdaa thm ti»t tfea <^ aat la tfea fw«i

est v&iltit it hae la tfea aaad aat, that la in tfea hga^

av iiiU aas-poalt* "^laa tha aao aat » «g«2^ ^«*^

fapB^tatiaa, thara^ef <»«<*«&

.imMXi^tt yar aaaaa awa fatjaalla.

j(0Dfftfl^^ l^tb itt« eioWt ^^t t<*t> -..^y^ v-w.,- '--'

«aaiBtlal prliioii.laai tfeat lo tl»«y ara ^aMAlta

iMMa tolorlnBle, eonstltamt a* £k>

« l»tli

^ Ilka

oait, in atkiab

3I0,

oa%)rl0a*

Page 178: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 179: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

n

.—,_« i.

^\.j >« s^ ^ i>~* ^» -

bfta B partly S9fmX oh««>t«r J««»ttas »i «» «»• Intrlnsle

»Mr« tea Mi UttX« «w»* tto* »%. All Atel»g

t^ii^e to «feU« Ma fft SiOttW «> i«l ohatwtw •! «*•

. ftttteta»e«*

not ftU. flk« fwd to tt««ir i» iwi «BM tbw «& -

«<9»x&t« •ttWi«oct of t -3Uc or'cr, :tv"

fMtt tlM bod? bM bMS

Ills e^;

•f «&« a^crfttto&-

«« «k« a»d« of bOns 0^ l>b« sool*

ft aw aw In « posltloa to

inA la tiM •alMrtwxf ' ^ ^^al of bwb.

%t^a »t tlio !«««•% tyrsx of

finft ft gbrrnB nott^arftUo *i^

«lil^ U vltaX It Id,

Page 180: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 181: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9U AllMTt

tiM ^img »f Which It IB Him ftiwi *• *e momnA «!«» *bii o»

ttftt i^«Bi*t» l&^rtae OB* %© b« tn A aetlslt© Xwstm* la » wMt*

It 1» • wtgotmH. «t tadtttriiiA fiw«» 2i«wi «• «f »«!»«»ftl

^9M. ItotaUy Www «»• tht <)ifiMi of «B«h of «&• foar attaasHt

«Hr«i» air, fire ««»4 »1»r, ojr «l«Bi«B»ftl fsmeaej bw^ too* <*•

forae of otwwt 9xA oteowai* to foot J^ i»*

(18)

aaliBA%6 thln@B oto «»««rlAl fwiw.

It Is ohftwwtoriotle of o f«wo BOfeaollo that It h«fO

^tt»t ono opcratlto dotowiaotlom t; ^i8«»« »

atono elwe^ ftais, ^i flotiuttl 9&' -^2^

19 a mtoiel fora 1» doftnoA 1^ l%« ^^ -^ i ro oaa I*

HBkM n» offort to iMfVO tfaftt pItt«o« 1^

I fyraa BOto»ai<i) few ORgoodWWd o oortati

It la ft d«finito pUeo It boo two aU It «im,

llsltod 19 Ito o«B eiottor «M oomo to

Mittor* Ronoo thoro le ono oo««tl»l c

following noturaU; ^tffon » aotorlftl fiona.

It lo »»«ol««l3r tat tUr

Xi^itod In the t«ttOhi?v? o.' •

Intrlsiio p«lnoli-lc apptswre a©

yolation BO aro Ut^-- j5« aa •

liolicd

Page 182: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 183: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

M

fMiy «««»% 1* wiua aSSBt ^»«««»« '****^^ ^4»9s«ly

amm 4o«» way «»tegff> a«cy^ w f&*« i* «»ly »»^« ^*^«

««Bi»a» •Uoo 10 4«iAi4 *• «!• »tei»l fftw. once It t» •!»»

««fia •• «»t po»lt » tiM»«» fl>«u 8» «»% ««t ana p«C«Uo«

irtiieh 1» viterg l» to i^wiU tUir jgagr-y^^igc mgn^^y, ,«ai

«*«•• siOfBb m SSSSi^ *«**^ "* ^****^ tfe» wt «f • i*te«»l

liMMUM aaSiiMU aw aUe to ewfe awut ia i«3««t tli«y a«»t fe*W

a0«e not <LtlM It i^BW fttwft aacladw ma ftUllty to «Bt«

loe&lly. aw««r it «« mt woar ^»is^»^ <«» i^^* •• «**

A0 a»Te «»• to4y 0^ «^ wil^l in Oi)^«» "'^ Wing* ^«

»» 1* art oaly * if»8» l«t .iBd » aa2^» er th« toaX

te m M^tetinM or not it iLs »»« ««» » ISB&JSlii^*

Za M Mm M «b« Mdftl o«i »• to «?«• •• J*** «l««aj^ •

Page 184: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 185: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&l

niiiiiiirtiMt irttoge (MRuHdltaan* mMMnlMi «!« tM>i » ft«t«ni;al:^

tliBiMt va ft 4«t«iiitatA «i«Ri«aft* ^3^ ^tAc cl«a»at U

fh» htOy and «E««nto its mHtu innvme* %& «« yflvto tr

OV0HI8 »f th« 1»«7. cogjM^iMmtl^ «• ma Mar ^^t «i« *oi»l i»

a M^bttftttM vm&m v^ of » d«t«tn&aSa^ «X«mrI «iA a A«%«niiiia&

«laacB%« Ut a« fte^ «>«» «»* *• ifiSJBSL'^ *" aiOaa ift

itttrAlit^. S99mA «»« QM0 wt thew 1« bo hi^wr ««t««lmtt<»ii

«• D« f»aa&t ftt l«Mt w&thSn tb« U r4ts of «li* mOml ttMlf*

or tSiAt rwaon 1b It «» JSLJSb ^* *^^ "***

ttiat ft nioielit:? of eperfttlowa dowwA* » c Ion of 0iv«ra Aya9«

ft iMA OiMOftOillg «•» t>e 8ftl« t» ^

joA) thftfc lo ft afttnral fsm, plus its trlTOfe*

l^lM lt« ft^jtntoftt to tBOvo %9»ll3 or l*fl ftoattytj «i« ooaidUw

y«««r UlM i?tm%!*«y or ttio ftottliafttitNi} of vtdLeU to tt^ d«M^*

amuig oloaaa* or am m% in wmpm% of Alofe ftU oaftof It lo

It lo ooU to ttoatioii In pftoolr - * «*. If ft aftttttol fl»» ••

«iieb oftiHOt ftWMwat for ft^ 1' »» OOOtainly tr.€

(23)

liMMn oool eiM» a«t«r to doflr fm» mm t!^

Page 186: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 187: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

fmtm «f » i^xA or of ao miljnil la aim^wtor to tbo roala of nftt*

osftl fonsttt foi? ^e a&ei)lG roMon ttait ». nn^ijed fmn m ««ish

MM aot «ti2r Itvtna; (^p«Pa%loni In its urovinet* i^th»«l» lii.te(s»»

lag tho potfit It vmad ai?s»fle« tbat tei« fivct cMTIsltim siv«i

of llio eo8& igr AMototlo «»xla aot •?» i^E)?^ ^ aa aniail,

IMrm ta s%« Al,tMHPt«8 fexv«nigt«n(t» 2a point of fMt m mSmtX

£Qxa is alM «k a^tf^y-^tictk aotloa to mt In tho firot i^\ila»

totoltfia doftnttton* It boooo«o aovo oaa ompo «i£iffftMHt tlat

St« AllMtrt mo i^»HOo«ti%»toa with ««t»tJlio^«^ Vm konsa ami

to to Mfth tibot it ««a<l M wii«|»»iia»MiMy iMOMrtol,*

isea3« hoa«T«p« io maah mr« thon a «l«^l« egnijnoi* ^bo

ooiil tn BMot io aoro thftfi « oiqplo «»tor» It is tilee a j^loti

OMi l&io 4Bitailo o hl^um 4ogroo of oom?ooitioa» la ^o

ntti vm aoii ml aoting »« » votiaaal oaiaol onu not j^wel; oo

M^UBftl* ^tft ^l^ert tells m that it io tho piMtfioal In*

toUoet oottiag ana la aiotioR* '^Mn OMMNI Hko siot of Iho

Mtionol Oi^potito aotttNaisMBd iQr tbo icnooloa^ ^ prae^ool

Int^loot* l««t of all ooaoo 1»ui oon^ti^c -4 «hkO

aotlQsio la tivo Ibe^. la vtoo of otmoh & anlti^lleilyr of oper*

otioao it io tnso to eo? thot tte twm of oMoi nmem to to «

oo^pooito foro* novo oo tliiia ttot of tbo mtaol* In mi. _.;.

oon» OM|»ooitioa la foaad* of Uio oonoitivo ftjppotito nitb tlt«

tody tol plao thio thoto io tho mticMBol oi^potito vltfe tlto

Page 188: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 189: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

i» oiff«riRl« hl#i«t anfl «>«• o<Wl»X«» *» ««^- ^-^ ^^^ ^^ **

rattaittl aalaal w«»:r«da§ U 4«t«iM4it«l fwm »1»w »«r &««»

one ttafct «f•tythlag ««4«p It i» wHait^^ to It ami la r«-

lutltm to It U •» id cttofl cot. It it ^m%m* te» intellect

Ittrtf Alob tnioy. th« »<a« of th« l^jsaaja*. OiwtqjaTOttjr to

tb« cwo of tM f •ttooftl iwA ae tt« asJsaLSS^Sm *^* *«

« ewi^eiiUon tf «it laNWtioftI tatfliliwt «• tfe« ^asL5B* «*^

aU «a^ it,--the M aaoa t«t»

t^ %» thl8 iiotet tb4Mr« i^p««« t» be 1» •«» «iea » i*y«loa

OimpOrt^litn 01 soul toA loOjr •«»«& to ^*iicb «i«Mi 1» & fM»l

««^QltiO!i of a f»i» with Its «tt«f o» ti-

afttotlel elcnKOt* SMt U «t»t i» n«mt % f

tton» aaiaoly, the c»ai?««lti«« of mm f&^ -^

antter. to tiw prowrat lo«tM«« of «» It ta ft ^oimi «oa»

pwiition of tho aotiag oouX with tJ« 1»«14 ^ *y

«»« oooi* *-aaa in MOtt ft n«» l«»«l !• 3^^ - '*****

tt ftn intoUootaftl soul tshioh oo ouflto «•» rnnefcl.n uo ;.Hot*

MtaBlly «ie lnt«lleet is not tho ftot of & ip . o? o 5^

oy^uu>-« -. aaeh a ctaol doflnltloa tf

Page 190: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 191: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

t«lleot. ly www ©f it *Si« iJody Is ralM anft <l«*«wtoi««

a«mv«r» «h« teMm la««U«ota»X Mfttl i« In ttoOf «

waim%am%^ a ««B^«t« hod aUostta «ttb ft fi^fwiX ^* M*

%h« o^imr cM0il«i«U« m^mt^ the aotU M »

idAnh It i» ife» iig»^ i«a giiot, a» 1MR la «ii« MoA

or f iiiiii«wl'"a tn «*i4ali this parttwOwP tk«% «f i.>.. .,

»g%, !• rootM* Tht OOP «wt IB ifee f^MWifcl» »c"*^ ^

l»rti»ipl« while tft«affiSJSEl *» «*• p«welU©, MO«LJti»c

yriJMipie. SMki is •» tMintKa i^rlaeij^t iot Mum

nHVtM io >^«3Ctf» nor »«oiaeiitfil. . „u2^ **

MmcqntKtly tb* fwreml int3Pii»l« ar >Ss«

Page 192: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 193: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•ms^%. on th« otl«* feaad It l» «»• SBS^LA ***^ ^** ***^

ei»aHd«f« M the fIrais yeo^^tlTO prUselple* th« flret •!!%}«««

!« fatt» tottug, ^M«i»fflaLi^ <l«ttiidwan«

to this l»«t»« «t the MM tlM M It ii AiHtlv* of th« f?y.wt^

e^vtns M iM j«ii»lpU «f liidtti^lwrtJUai tn •plrltoftl tufe-

•tamM ©f tliia kiwi, it im» *• •«W «»«i thftt thl» »!. M,

.^ tt. hM ft jiJ30_flitarJaSffiJSjaaL^^ ^ i^^gg^ ''*^**

tbftt tb« aaSa* •» *^ JSL^* *• *^** i*i««t8r tn* lateUMtuAl

f• oBit i»t ow^^t that St. *X*«ft te» >«8 thlidctog «if«a#p»

eod «»1» aM«rt af M lil«r««hi«a fiwwa ««vMlt«ott. »• few l»«i

m^im to t«r«« ^ twwaitiMs of wrtMsarrtoftl oo«po«ltlono of

Vk^am toA M^w «»«•• «»t 10 wiiy» M w haw J^wt <rt)0«r»o4,

^«ra l» to «»« ooai Itaolf o «0» * tfeo ^?«e| ttio ^SUSSl*'

«io iatoUootaol oool in «o la «*» St. Altwt Ifeo mtl &t« fium

of feo ^»1« «a M w«U •• ^ ' «^» «>«^ o««ii^

«»«A m Ittoif. a> * w»tftl two to My tliot

Mm is Vnc--^ " »«at »^' ^:>U--ifl. oaA thot It

nrnijUt V.

Sttt It 10 t opooolWo tor tto to otOF »•• mmm St. &li»ort

oattiittoo. 1^ M« tho ja^jB* itoolf l«o • fow ^

to QOA BtMMif In 1*00 "" "'

"• ^* »**^

Page 194: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 195: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

It. 0* mixw ^St* Albmtt

nan hem it for It %• ^ 1 '>* Mtwrt heaitmm

« ••«««-« M «l»t «h» fiBM Of ft A»fn tv not in th« s««» §«ki» «•

ttot of «hteh It Is tt^« tvm onA ^» thio yoROoa umi io odoq^Mtt**

tj ttstlttit fion Ooa* SoA 7«t tl»% f»ni abieh i» tbo g»wf fogaao

to itoolf tmOjr * £»»• i^ad •» It to trns to m^ thast tKo jgo

y^ Of «io «o«a totit no otttetmoo tiy to and o^oln M oot of Hio

M^ teo itootf ft foia» AnA «b»t io it--.iio tolia « ««»t It Is

tHO l^inity* ft» firiAtty to 1h« fMn of IMtt <w&o»t i«ilor. io

tlM fWRi of tbO OOOU

It romlM «i*t tho Uttflieto Id* of l^inSLJSSl ®^ ^^ ^^'^'^

ooul i» tho ftinitar «na aoliiiiiir «loo» f!M qototloa new la i U it

ft mtasal i^ro^or^ of lit* oeol to m to tho iMige of tho isrini^

or la it mB^mmtxamXt For st* /4tert it io Uto liKfi* of oroation

mtA flo It to mtuMO* «iftt to to asjr tho intoUootaiil oota hao

"b^m OMAtod lijr sod «0 ftft imm *t tlio M.mB«a Trinity* ^^

9fttli to BOBT epee for ft StvtaB XUtsdafttton vhioh vtll «M^&

lotb ho» trio «aoBt tatollMt to ooaij^ttitie aith oooii o ooal

ooA ohftt oofftotoao? tt boo in ito^tf ftiiA in t)io Xtttnr

B«o«for» toiioro oi«mtta« to im% Otooaooioa «o m...

tbftt eoooiAtng to ^ft* Alport mm In OoA oMwo onity to oIh

oolttto otur roBOon ooa oroi^ tliiero o ^wd o»t ftbftt ildtoli (M to)

•bA ft qao oot i tfao £«ttfto)» 004 !• «•& loioimo df nto 9tl«io«

Page 196: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 197: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K« 3, mum ifSt. AllMH

Itet thi« fsnml ooet/08ltti>n le ood Is j$«wi««di 1(7 Map nMMMMft*

1% tf»M ast lv M^ mum mttO^ mag wmA Aisttaotleii mm. 9€ •

Mtaa «r4«r in Oat 1lfwMlf» 2a *U «N»%«il %&ii^ lltlf«iV«r ttMM

are ir»«mU7 4i«tiae« Mift viOty 6ic«toit sHMA0lm« ^stntt

vt find e plnztttUV o^ 4i9««ttaM ia wm tlMr* nMt be » oea*

Uattiiiai of Nvvna fiMnat* W» tdOMdROit of iihukhhI SiMMl

•alNlmUs tft «M aaii,

„,«i^ vs tb» mul 99B»iii«nA tn yy^ ild^

ay «it liM « fam i%a«lfi aoialjr* «k« £rlai^« '^i» fi»m lM»v«vaar

!• isf&nlteljr dl»«in»t Stm «h» m«ui AUt, m* Sa %eli« *nA(34)

1% U i^pMrtttia %• rwttU ttm% itm moI m aa IntaUaattMl

aiAa^anea liaa i& iteaU acvaiKl raUtiana* Flvat el* all. It &m

1M aaeasatt? af ita «ai»« la aa fur aa it ia faom tha flnt

«aaM»« SaaomU^t it la x^oMiUa in itaelf ainse it tAet^ aat

iMKfa baen, at laaat in ao far aa it la «i>&t it la~-<» eraataa(96)

atttetaaea «i^?aaA«Bt mk OMU la a^iar imrda tfeia intaUaotwl

aaai toe in it4s »«ar ««»««*« tta cai>a ar taa tat «a» iiM<^

it Aas^aada on joa aba la ituB «»ibi it alao htm ia ita<Af

aaawifta^a aaad aat a nataao^r *• that ftosoai iMfcag af tiui

oaa aat, fhlf«l7, «Mr« is a taiatiaa» in aa far aa ma aanl(37)

^* iSm^StS^ ^ Mttar or mattlOiic aaitafial. mw than,

iluit ia the ralatian »f Hkia «ti»aa{»ld yalatioa ta tlia saafl aaV

«gw f^ «aatriaa aa a abala and ta st« MWrt*a <M«ttta« aft

Page 198: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 199: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

the relation of &U telagt t« tMib tttlMr fiaft to Q»&t Oat

i>riaei|>l« of oupioaiitltm &8 f^iiUeaUo to tho y«e»lsll«a of

all of tlMOO f&onoBti*

in 90 fiur ae tiM soal ie ft oortftio inftollootaal a»t^ar«

iMMmiff ito aoooooitjr l»o» tbo <3od omi Ito pomUUlty fma

itsolf It ooa %t ^OfiiA qpon ito«U| It ««a fcnoo Ittolf In ito

(38)

vovlooo volfttiono* 2n m flMF em tho IntoUoelnftl ootil fenovo

itooif la Ito ttno opt it 10 iRtelllf^Uo ao a noooooiy prte*

eipto of lnt«llooti<m« mroiMh ito ^ mtt^ iriutoo ftam lo «h«

Trlsit^^ tho iota Imovo ttoolf in 4feo lUnwtaotioA of Its Cmme

tat& tikon^ tiuur^o In tiiO neoeoolt^ eaaA latolUirlHllt? of Ito

CottM* Bdo oot iQf oldo^ It knoM lto«&f oo aeoooost? la 1^

U^ of the Firot Cetioo lo the orl^^ of Ito oon ll#t olioto^

It mdovotnj&o* ^^t lo to oa^* ieaBwln^ ttoc&f In tho ll^^t

of tlio Flrot 6«aoo It ooetovotonoo itoolf la Ita ctao oot euBA

th«t lo tho orl;^n of Ito o«b ll6Jht« ooUodi aoo IBM lnto3^l«otoo

aasmm qnly<W9ftlltor» l!hm «o teve tfeo noeooolty of an eotlvo

jMTlnel^lo 1^ Oiiorotlon f!rom tho oot ^ oblon tbo traftl toaowi

Itoolf» miXOiis^ Ito 9f» oot. 00 aoooooofjr In rolol^Loa to Qod*

toeottio tlMMOal lo t»&9 In th« iamga of ^^od It taoo on eg^t

latoUooti ^ xmmtk of Ito dlviao ovigla ^o oool io» in Its

fomol priiwljaot tt saWtoaoo ohloh pooooeool In Itoolf « »t^

wol tkgmA latolloot*

Page 200: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 201: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Vi««|v«« la lt» fljr«t r^atiioa tat it «!» te»w« ItMlf w

•ttaees^tlVI* af tt«t ll#t. »«» «il8 l« «n iaf«rt<»» t|9# •*

kiwwlad^* mntljr* t« knaw wumelf eeoordla^ to >^ .fflft*<W|*

It i» i»t to know 9II0MU m 9m*» nwowlty %«t la oa«»»

pMffi%ttlt9 or MO^tinty* m« ftOt *» ^U^ «»« •w*^ >Bi»»«

lt«elf la tMt »«»«i f«l«tKm glw* »i«« t» «a« i« «i« «rt«i«

of ^i« »«»«5?tl*« prt«ttyl« in teWrtM,-»-th« Inti^ootuo ^as^

tmni> aartly, Iteo wlf-totfrtw* - - ti^* l«t«U«et5»l aota

MttOfAiag •• It !• In aot«iUft la t xi«tl<« fw Ito ajft-

MM to MOW lt»*lf «ttl to *• «*c pilot Of «l# l»«ff

tht<IO#l tM p«Mt» Of Ilf••

V» «f« t)0« la » t^oeltlon to ooadLwMi th»t th« nataro of tho

c^a i« wflk ««** » antT«BP«al »s«t lst«ll«ot l« not wOjr oow*

^H«l« «itli lt| It 18 ft iM»«0tltir« ?ojptfe«aor«, elB©« ^« «rli^ «sl QttQg It ftW latrlrailo co»«Ktlftl pirlaot le» of tbo ooid

i9i»t 4«viw8 fioa tiwi iwnt lliBe«iao bo intrlnole s«fto of «»o

•ool. fh»o tiMi osMli i«ft tWi »wolWlo latolloot or* IntHiwto,

SntollootMl 9tliwtpi«o mt nam of Wlni?» Iw* of to»ol««?50«

I» cwi^oot ti 9«t«MV MA •»% »*• ^^>«* la»*»*» ^* ^^ "**

to moMft tt tte tAimm%. tM l*«i o» tho «0Mii p»la«lplo

«lill« tlM pot«i^ io toiolvoft to tho U«i>»Oft or pooaiWo

^$MBi^f,^^nm»9 tho as^it •«* pMtlWo intoUoet will <ilff«»

Page 202: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 203: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Mit Of «!• tt«»l iaitUtet Sm 99mmnmA «11& lnteIiiglUL«a moA

tttoaib ioA M »!»»• it* i^jtioApl* $M ««Uir» and iatvtnsie

(a)•nC !%• dun Mt it to te vithin tiM Mai« th« acMit Intelloot

MBMt of nMMttBitgr 1» «» MtiTo iidtftatio 9ev«r of tlio mmm(42}

mm4» tmiaBMA vittin tlio ooo«»&« itf tea ooal itoelir*

8«» tiun ohoald t^ agonl iidoUoot ^ 6«fiM«7 st«

AlliOrt gatiMTfid his ^i2Kiiti@o teto 6 (teriidtii» whieh xxaa oo

feUflwot iai^leot<Mi ainpp oacanaiWi ttifjrjaltiwwii eot aot-*

ontift ot ^neipjqw ootifaai tatollifftmtaat 4st ptopt«t hoe

aicit i'hiloaosfeooa (aoa oot iwtollootuc q«o ooIj oaaiait fwKgo^

n oeal tlitto it 9£ oaoh o notoro ^b«t not oaX^ io

OR o^Mit inti&loet toooneilAUe ^ith it* it io tmrnnHA I9 it*

nd* 4«ooat fl»UoMi fioa «mi foot teat earn Is o wjaor gBtnaao

aad oiiftt 0000 on ia hSm io fevt « portiealAr oooo of vd»% tokoo

ploeo ia tho sndTorso 00 o otelo* She titroo rolotimo iridic

on latoiiiflOBOo «E«Miooo« ftmnim ite •» tiihoaro iatiiUsil>io»

O90 BO (lifforoRl llNK VM jj^roftootivo yelAtiono ia tiio sotionol

oottl* Xtt oar ooRMh for o j^nei^tlo of iBtcrpr^fcotion of tbio

iooteiBO «o fouMt ot hoM a ttioov:? of tlto Utonura^ of fioflw

«]«n« wnan o oovtoin roalion of ttaemm fbOM oiU )» isfooti^atod

Page 204: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 205: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•• 9, mum 91

8t« J^lUrt

«n%ftU« BM«Mi1gr anft tinl7«rml ohMMter of th« aftst totellflet

•9Vlii«lla« into gwtitiwa* to • atoair (laifvrM m wmim alsim to

tkffffinimA n»m af tt« mtei*! 9M»«rtie«« obviowlj I9 pU»»

i»r tiw t^rlnilgr as Hi* fftw of i^ m^lU goitt ••% iit^ Al%«ri

i»« 0107 tliami tti« o^ia it« 9«m nwMMllsr in th« illomtattHtfii

£n« ilw Oman tet h« 1«vim th« «t«r 0|^«a for a «o^pi«lMn*tv«

fhaaty of l>tYt»i UlOBdflftUwu ^«*f«rp if minh 1« the mmiAk|r tat »«• Alk«rt 8M» t0 401 this tvoiiUtt «ver «a <i8«a^

tst«ll«ot7 !.«t Oft torn myv to tM taftotl^ vtet ^ aalvwaal

•fltnl Intolloet hoa »t it* AiopOMA «aft t8ia« tt i» g^lxig ^ 4»«

Page 206: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 207: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

wHM ftetlve «M Intrlmie p^rtne^plt of kimlw&m fi»<3« lt«

deHlni; a^Rtnvt a fB«la#iilMiA lt«k^V9ti»S« fh«r« le ftrst «ad

ftMrtwwst th« ^xml definition of th« SMlt thin tMi «aafW

of foaraa^ «h«tt the iMri«tot«lle«i i^CMfiition o o^>iYle«d

j^8fM«l8 Of teBewl«<ise» oT«v«tbiula««d l»*h %y to.;- -^ FofwMiii

4oe%rln« Add fShm lUuminatJUm ifiMMiiy of sit* ^ -""« o« :%«

varioiui (aodtftontloiMi Hilelt ineh af t^«M i^rwKit

a« th» hando of ^« AllNnrt otiU le w& ^r

|o (teftt %B eoitiffeat ^o Aoipttvliitlaa eiMrttie «i^'

terirwMidi fmn S«« AEigt»tla«» ^^ietotUb /irleon

InA di»tin^(ttuilA« fiwa OiM^ of 1di««w fHo fix tho

«St»fl) ia%«lloet «ill t)«» for :^» Al1»«r%» <&% oiioo in ttto Itoo

of &1»Btraotion amS lllwsdiuitlon* Sot* j? dlffi<mlt^

^tmm^ ita«^lf, &^03r$ m tfet ^Hxu^^/.— „-..,,. j>mAixm **«*

ootlvitgr tamo&lotoijr* It eonovrr.: -v-. 'iul»tase@

of th« ooal moA Ite foooltlos* thill c

t^o aoetrlne !>« dleolpAt«4 th« Qoootlon of Vti» tx^...^. ^

tlM Istttt Intelloot «o«net %>• ado^tifttol^ trmiM* In Aioetaao*

ia^ 8t« Ajl%«v«*» doetrino «a ttio rntar* of tiio wol arafi ^%

Page 208: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 209: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

A, ^, siller

hl«r&jrahioal eM|^«ltion« thiU diirtottl^ he* %«cn tMMMttA ^p«n in tb«

^r«vi9a8 •«etion« «1i*r«» li««ev«r* It wut di«ttaM«a onljr in to

M it WM iMe«M».i7 to MMM»^t fOT %M SntrlnBic prln«lj«>l«0 of

irit«Uoetuiil operation* Jar i>r«i«nt pmMloa i» Mthtv til rant»

lab AlMtU of kaovlod^c «• « uholo onfi to «ais>l«ia tbo fttootion

of %l)o '*artloUo'' mumX lnt«u«ct» to «ill» thoroforo. tftko t^

i«M)Alotoljr ilMi «tti»tion of %tm oool «ad it» facultios**

Aoeotilns ^ ^t* Allwrt eor^idn povoro flow jlroa tbo aub*(1)

•teaM of %ho eool* Hiolr divoroifiostian orioeo sot frws tM

vorlotto ttcto of tiM )M»4jr teift lAthor firom tlio ottlMit<m«l&ll«;^- ofis)

VlMt ha« tHMm oalA of ^vioonaa* tuniajr* tliot tho noot ooli«tt

eiueurftotor of hia ctootrlno la «M> ocpatolsloa of ^o l^oft of aoiU

froR tbo i&oo of fiMra can oqmll^ voU 1)o Si^pUoa lio 2%» AXUatt(3)

on ttLla j;>oint« /> ^luvallV of f<Ma* lo on oaliaUlaliad foetf

pi«r«llt/ of aoala» lM««?or« la mlA]iik»U.«» Vb» aotU fOr 3t*

All>«r1i la a anlqiia fWiWiliiiJLai fvoa It aiaazmto t^ vsrlotia fomwtt

vM.9h fiad ttBltigr only In 1t»o oosit'a aabatonoe* Bat ham oaa

tiMi aool 1)0 » aatetoneo and atUl ^ divl^Ml Into tho iatl<aie>l,

tbc ' tlTO» ana vagototivo iHnwra?

i 3 r.aothlu8, tM original oouroe of tho *<iaod oat* "

£latlnetl<m* 3t« Altort «^ta llio notion of ttio ami m> &

(4)toton ..atgat^tlTaffi d ivlcioa into Ito ^ayta or i>artieular i^ooera*

Page 210: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 211: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

pomrt •» the tolbijcet is to isbftt ia in it« '!&• tool rmMnt

v,ov :.>u i^lbfrt teUa w tliftt lth« •»< of tti« iaf«irt9y

pomom la not Ihelr owntf Isait 1^« iWf of tlie M^Mt p&ft«*

»^kmmU9* If th« «tol« is nM ml^cet of oil th» p«war«*

i» tlii« «t)Ole «3i« hiifboKt j?ftjft—TOtiomXit? m« unitjr <»f lft«i«

tliroo i««era in mn bccpv at of ^ten;? im^ cict* ror

«Hwqpl«9 Joot ae in e >^» vhieh io trul^ a dt^altioa

tiMuro la onlj? one fgt '.. do* is «f«rjr atflnltlon tt^o re-

l&tioRs of §mmM ««& 4Uieiv«no« olrlalns* fho s»o««t« of ttio

flOfl& t«e« to^l^ relatod m gomUi to &itivtmoe . capttiar to(71

oonirtltato l^e t&tata Awtootatlyaitt ttota«l]^*

fSiO aawao do Cirootqrla ^jrovi^oe e r«llaid,e rooolotion of

tiM aiffleullar* i o&a feo eo«»id«rott %gr ^o 10i>^lciflii

•aft tv Urn asitKur«l ^Mloooiili«r ox> tho iMtey^feurelelMi {r&tioalo

•nft roiU In mm flyot wojir t&t oosO. lo takoa at ttalvwealo

imH sM^mlaofm Horo it <nt«ro ixeto %tm l<^UiAB*o oonoi^or-

ation for ool^ ho can oonai^or tbln^* Ofport flnM vliftt tikoy

ojre in oo^ ao tmlTmroal oM j^oirtioiilwr* la ffeo ooeenil vo^*

rumiy, rei, %b«t« avo too nedeot firsts aooordlag; to tlio

1^4^. -^ioh the eoal haa In natoro ami hore Vm Hfttaial

£Mloao^littt «sttor0{ 8oeoM]jt in 00 ttat «o ti^o aoal la a

Page 212: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 213: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B, 0* milmtSt. Aiuaek

(8)

ana this is tfcs it«tai^ar«lei«&*t cum*

i,U Albert In ealltfl^ «*••• «»•• pM«i«l« etw«l<J«wition«

•llB^mtM «i»t of tli« l-hytlctBt} far, «it |>|jy«lfii»t to«« »»t

laofe ft»r f7«m9 fesa aiff6r«ae«» nor le th« w in

nature uvit. cniij. o iiMPt ftf • »i»to4««» ^k* tfit-iv *. ,.,;l it A »a»%

»f %li« aaiYcrsalt rftttowil aalBal. Itxt, he dli^seo af tii«

contldemtioB af the la;^oy^ aMat the oniTeraAX aw! p«rt-

leuUr saiere fee sd^U U oaa»ld«r«4 •ith«r «« ft - '"^5«« (fta^

b«Be« Sa«««9erU iw^ »»lnl^ ^«o«a8« (M»taall^ it 4 a m% a •i)«ei««h

or ftf fi differ»WG (in ohleh Oftse It is tsiMm aorc pro£?erl:.'j>

ft aity osg ti^re or* th^M 41f£«r«w«i is IAm aoal—T^^ttaUe*

atnalU* aw4 ratiorjil, v ie tfca oodl te»E«R lof

'

istetratlo^ l«ft i« tt«* of «i« "^

it ia «ot esqpUeitl;^ ••% ftaf^i U«« Igr ^^ Alb«rt «« c;^., .v-

•ioal *at If th« aoal la 1fc« io^clao»» fiaiMildwwt-

owwwly tiown aa (Hffarantia it %.;€wra «»at each eratioa

(ae aifftfwtia) i« «l.o«« to tha autetanae anfl natwc .- .«

aaal In itaelf. province of the ?!«tap!)iralot«& aa wa

saw ftteY« Ic jul ao a eatwtteftoa In b»« lifea ooaaiftai*

at&on titan iiM<^ ie left refara to the aool aa aniiB&tow aaeat

«iis ia notldns o«ier tten the aoal aa pwfaoUon. re

wivaraall^ tin ita tlnrea ^aaasl ^ ite ^ffarwttia, jr^^ _

Page 214: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 215: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R« a» tHUm 9«fit. nhu^

l«»gie!Um flBjT prfldleat* it of a^ , £ll»«rt

»•«« lt« 1»t tisrias to t«U « IMV i, in Id^eot

t«nMia OMs gewttoato «i|aft*|'W <w<f of ^* soul, ^.....^;iAl antaal

•ad MA* 1% Manot te done in regard to lOio ma» li^oewito it^

pftrtleolor ftsA not io th« stn^olaj^—th« a»a« In reo^oct to

ttda iMt tmar of pf^ASwk^sis* HMWljr of th« omb* galllbot ho«o»

«• etmwt pvoff«r s ltotoi»)ii|Oleal oi^loaottoa in lo^loiU toroB*

If i^e is 80 ^«<» «=> '<»^ A «s4r threo grodM or lovtAs is

^0 ootti* First. tfe«i 'oul iteolf 9hl^ is eLrpie

liko « (tiffarwMiey «ad Miporior to tho s«ia« trtiloh i» con-

toiaoa ia it pot<wtate« -^o find how the rfttj^jo^

«oov>i\ >

irtiioh ^0 oottl io dooignaved rationoU & oonoidcroti

this nfttture is tho logicioa*s a« ^niTersall* 'dlj« tM

povora* 'Te^'«tetlon• esasatioa aad rationalit ^ tho

•eu.1* r aro to t^iO-

t>o alifcrame.

Slit. 1 et intellfcota la «ho hi.-?!'a-« lUmf aro c .

is mat ^i>«ei«8» asdo oxw* frsa the rolatioa of gsnao to dlffw

«r«ao«» Shio is for tht lOt^eian do aarticalflro« Thirdljfa

aad fiaall;* in tL< Uar asii ttui levsr povara, iio

tafiraatini of tM -«^ / H^ tho «(hoio oool* .: -^ &

vosiflo Mdor aa£ to thair gmptit or^^ r^« la thio

Page 216: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 217: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»• a. Siller WSt. Albert

nmX almm v«iB<tftUv** 8«tuittiv« Mai

llOj

4iv«r«tv in tfa© murioos vorfcs of Uf« »i — ~- .

,

.--i.

In M^lADfttioo of VaXu r«lftttoii te it Mt«a« wgr* st« Albert,

ttet tm Miii at fta» flototfttifiwi wttte* in itte&f Utto ii^oeiAl

e«««r«* '«>^ui it 19 as t!iie form* X«a p^rto «« ^«»«r« «r« •»

tH* Mt«rial «l«mmt8« iStat is to S(^» «M ^vwtft of tio soul

aro sttrii «»at tbay a»« riAataa m gmmt to aiff«N«9« oonstitot*

ftac tta ^^1««« fbo v«g«ftaU« is in tlm senaiUa metft. «t in-

t^tasta «ldU th« v«^

aotg at intallcetqi* 9 not ad^rat

vftkftt St. Albttrt ««aas -.. -^uui nor oan ^-it, --.

(131

aapacata» tdilt^ is «cm» Moaning of jiitallw^ab t9%9 it a»t i^cn

4iffio:at to aaiataia «rtn a fttatinstion of re&son, aaah

iaas a raal diatiaotiem, of tha faeoitiee aM t i.. . ..w

(liatirast <Mm IMS' li« Cvan the e it woala a^i'^

^liaaa potvara ar« ia tba «Ntl not i. ll;? or 7irtaaU^ Itat

aofct et intellccl«t ttiat masf aiatinotien aaila %at»aaa ^« aeal

•at Ita faotatiaa ia ns^i^tile*

mwnn^ tlia tagatttttva and a«ii«ttlva e&wamti i^lnm to tha

•rguHi of this to^» tha aota is tha aat of tha bad;* BMNnar*

those j/99m9 era really fon» i^tioh ore aonso^oint 9,^*00. tha

aotiyitjr of the lAole aoi4l for thay only est ia nan V tlMi aet of

Page 218: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 219: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

tht r^MHm* l%i» vc(Mion« like tlte iniEtiverftia e^wt omum Oottf

l« tmlvwTMl In its >%etlTit^; for, in Vtxe Hodj of mm th«{15}

»ftUoa»l sool •r«iafttti«r« %'etatw wia •«»••»• Uk«igris« tt

MMrit* f«od Igr 4li« ttitoMMAi ana diMi«H« It 1^ l^e llv^r* ^>«

y«MMKi is thAt thtt talMititnee of Hit* «e>uI dirtett cai Ita parts

t» ttoa h«ftjrt» for thtM all Iflbta ojqgMBUi am attaeliaa aodi tte«i^

%IM heart 'ttia sool in itt varKmt Cwnw i^wfamn th« v«ig«tativ«

«nd 8«»itive f^BEiotiofitf* It ia ocdy la tfce heart aaaaaaaa(16)

iwaa,

,€[>»i«tiam«

. , 'Oteatattv . ,. Alltert in ex&l&in*

ing tlM» poeem is likaae<l to the totaw ealled definition,

the tmitar o^r ie that of ^.c aet or o:

diffM«ne«« 3biP /. j-e la the rational

acta et lnj..-;iicfw;i as. cucii b ©as tJ/ ' *' '' '

: -. .' .-viilvun

ie « neen laeteeen aa iati^al ^pl>

ite n>af eallot «te« triMHre «ie eliolc^

ite i^arte for it ie aot aeeeardir -- '^ - ^-"-ja* ©f it.e

pewMre in eaeh part) a»a a vgAr< lole {«a«re the pare

isenoe oontAlzu Ifee ei^eeiee eM«ftt in torn emtain the iMiTidviale*

}

^inov ^t* 44bert ie almgre faithful to thin " ~ rrie<m of

,>Qteetatirqfa to definition it maX^ eg<^m9 imt the

is in Urn <Ufferenee ep^ et intelleetti aM eim be ;^re«

Ateatea of it eeientiall^. - " -. .jart af

Page 220: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 221: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

• 6* ftill«r

flM fsitddtty of Hm 4llff«r«n0i4 it !• not 09 dia^net ttbat

ar^;>er* sintt* th* ^aaw it ^olitt at intcifeta in tim Aiff*

•r«a«« th« eMBUi »«)eaM aMf« ttea tfe« potcMg/'* Zt is mi aot

^'^^'^ go^^it^i** '-^^ j»<tttiit is itMStetmA «• —OS or g»H

•SM, tsat potcetee it a flottntiii edTeottd to ft rttlitj^ of its

vmt ttaiM ^» aetac ioeofttionce^

la hit «8£>otitloa tf tbt gqo tst «ad ^9tt4 ft Mtultlng ia

^t ititrattAy of tmnm ana ^m twrt thtn mOtrato rtnlitn* i)t«

Alport* 99 lu^t tttdi, o«id aath to Bttlfeiat mA mt

of x'oitiort* In this relatsd probtts «t« tsne ooi^netiofl it

oi>«xatlv«« la aottlUofl «s oah differ tlis gtyttt* gotootat

taA jwaaittty tfaioh i^Ugr mue^ on la^rttnt jNKrt fia 3t» Albsvt*

fbo ri^siflity with wKioh St* Alport iatsipattd ailbert in th«

i^rofiont qasati(»i it ntisttinod at ttr«moati7 ia t)*e %iteyo of

^bi» pyeoito pn>bl<«i» IShm fiMnaittst of «mi1»«rt art itfftetiiro in

teiiifllii^ to «o^plotion «io dootrlnt of tlis totoe potsstotiyim

— -— at* MWrt si^^otmft it.

td.flM«i<m of tiko X

ilto fM« t!« vmriffeis oots taking r>lf

mth«r ftoa tho ootartentiollt^ oi' l&e soul. St* AitNurt vtQitilttt

an taipieaafttion tfiioh vlU Mtain the ; t etill

Page 222: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 223: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B. a« iilU«r 3L00

St. autt

MMoat £^r tii« |»rtltioii odT Itot sool into theo« ttorM na a»

Br* or l«a9i vi^rH^tiveft sensitive sal rAliloa»l* B« inyaOB

It la «}u» tlaAlaHtsr oit tl>« m«U to an Iiit«lll.s«aao«« fto moI

r«miiili« om in sobotaBe* ima its powers diversifioft ^ tho

l&rso relatioas vteioh lure in it, na«iotjr» to itnov itself in so

far OS it is from Ood. to know itsolf soeagtaaai ia gaoa ost wid

to koott its&if as it is in potsnoy*

5%* ^>«ntti»ns to shieh tbss« thrso ro]*tioAs ^vo rlso

ewa ^ UstoA as ftillovsi first, ^«ro is tho ogoratio djyjna

tMWanso th* Bovl pt^mrva %im aalwro of tbo Wig in %ht mi^a

9f Life axxi ootloni 8eo9i»iX^» tiMVO is tiio aa>0^^ Intaii*

ootaaiie tae«aso tho smJ. has intelloetoal ks-

flds is tiio iHL^pio soja, Hio ratiamjisi finr^ ^.

opoMlHo saiaalis «itsti<& is in tho sooi booattse it ie u^ aaitor

oorporii* %l»ts tho doetrino of the taittin j>otostotiflaa proeorvoe,

i» Hio Ofdor ot 81 pie atilistfflstlalitjr* tho siallaritr ^Idh liio

OOal OBjoaro witli t^ xat«iiigonco« act,hc--r •V..ic; Uoc^rlru: rll'j^-o

Ohi ooul aa^lo coon for* ana j^r soA of, a

llTino Xlloainfttlon oan only 1>e .; ^ „ __ .^

to tho oxi^laaation of the to^mioal oqioi^Mat ro^ttlroa xox the

aotivit^ of tho sflpOBt inkolloet*

In hio fie -^ilwa 3t, Al'feort S]peaks of fb _ af appr*-

hoosion, three > ,ii of vfaioh io

Page 224: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 225: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

the r«e4v>tl9a 9f t^ fom of %b« ott^«et mt ft6e«ar4lii$ tsi it*

a»g« n«><ytlc tet «eoer&liig t* lai- ewe IctentionBle. ttaroa^

tti« f^»ftt« bMoait aa intaatt»> mnm ki)»il«fi«ia •? tlit otojMt la

9Vtaia«ti« ^njr ot^eet tea nuQr |jitaUi€:l&la asj^ta iibi^ ava

iraaalT«a Igr amna of tho Son* tf that ol»J«ety tuo ttMgr aaaidantal

or satetaatials

'&« fIrat isMd,^ ic tt.c .

la litetraatad aada«fi^amtt'4 froe mttcqr, ))i4t not i .

of tha ^tancgr of aattor nor frcm Ita awMHittono* v

are to be found tha fiva aKtarior aonaaa aa tha t- .

ptmtn* It la TiotaUa tht4 tba alwtiroaHoa apokon of h^a ^f"

St« Albort la aat akin ta li»t trinioh U «ha tmalaeao of tlM

asaat Intalloet* ^a alpatrMtion at this i;>olnt le a atalto af

•iBfiaratlos ana dlatlnotlon from oorlaiUi aadcs of aattar* It la

avaljp ^a aatidltl>n of ttie opoalao raacdvad tar tble or ««t

jl^ortlcultr scnaot Intarior or axtarlort daal^n: :;«r

•r laao elaoonaaa or ranovai from aatt«r« vaA ita ao^ik^ lEhiara

ranalaa than aa fniatlon of aq^ttdog Int a atata vS Alatlnatlan

«r aastaratlon*

Haa •mm^t kaln^ a paaaira paaor* atwala ta aead of aoM-

thlM athaar tbaa Iteelf to Irla: it to ^* . vitatavar oato am

aovea 1* i^rlor to tua tan of Ita apatatXon* Banea» tba aaaaiUe

Page 226: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 227: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

m^wteXl^ jp3r«o«lw Hut tman vkldli, r«aS«r«di In «e%, iMHwaMi

iat<ntlsn»ll7 ^^ smsiUe o%4eet. ^bBt ftotoalljr It »«««lTe4

Ttgf ttm •«ai« Mid rtnaeni t^aot pMtiTe potmey In Mt te t^

8«B8lt>l6 ap«Qte« of the ««9»iM« e%J«e%. vwcifM vttiicmt

nfttter. The altcmtlan tri^oh takes]91m« In tl^e pever is not

ft iA«ng« «f ^« j^tJUMd 0M«f But «i tiMttsitlon fxom & ^ri-(S8)

vfttioa t9 « h&Mtofl. offtPotM V ^« •CMl^l.c d1ij«et oiit«id«'

{&)th« tool* ^« f«nMi Me«iT«d, aM «eel4Umt»l t9wm «hl«h»

«&il« not la thalr mttrlal ^i"'-^ -^-^HeieMi ate not tfM»(30)

fyam tHa 9»«t«aeMi of nattiv to its oo tng fns»tion«

%«BiEingr s«n«rall7 mcf ty^a or e^ ^^emioa in

«!«•• ovdara of knvvlod,^ la aaal^ ttat th- -- *' ' —^ la not

«luai@«a in satetaaea^ nor is tn« olbjaet k • -fim

iQwaar raeiBine «hat ha was tefora ia«9«in, ^Jiat eelorsft

a¥Ja«tt ha fails f^rtaaataly to baoaiw: - ^i-*.-^. -— --g

aAvtot of Biin7 Oifforwit colora and t^is is ao tot

gtvUm of i^i»r«h«taio(u On tbe other head, the o)34«?et it»iAf,

ti^Aterer its plaaa in the hietarch? of teiagf is s^aancible to

all typee of kneaaUe aajj^te* i^et rmains not a «t%it <llff«r«at(31)

ften iritat it «aa ^fore it was knotm.

ftet tms is so sen %a smr frasi the faet t^t llie ^ia«^

reeaivee are eenaihle tipmiiM e in the oh^aet

etae gftteriwlea tekt nee also m.: the aoai l __

Page 228: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 229: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(38)twttBttoaftlc ««»ttitMle» ilkt nprni— is «n tetcntla of ^« mia^

•«n«ed t2it«i#k liaiab tfet Ibi^ tt»«lf in icaoeni It »«itm th«t^

us « pri»et|>le of ismmlne tb* t . ?1m Intimtton S^t stm

Al1»cart difftM AS ws oan s«« tr . . rci. It is th« foni

iriMlob* l^r»p«rl9 t^aaltiiiii* ^sUtm esee «Mita to afttt«r tsoA to th«

thing SMfiMsit 9f asttsr saA ftvai* Boct 1M f^ta w ioteation

is ^At throQ^ wHAtlh ths thing is ei-^'^'^^."-'', eitbcn' inaivifiaalUr

M ill seas* lanowli<t^, Sf tmlvsrsfniljr as ia intellsettntl ttitsw«

].sAs«« 2*^ io thsn a si^ of eone^t of tiks ^in^si for e^cai^loc

thro4«g)> si^t one not ooljr oMsiiw a toovlsdi^ of color » ibuit a

oertain swuiiao kaoolsdgo of th« ooiovsA olij^et* "^o objeot

is kmnm as eoiorisd «aa taxg ivaeigismn^ osx ttiis rosin p«rtaino

pais to 'Bio colored ot^sot in «• mmh as it is eol<»-ect* IMs

**si,<?i qnaliV'* of the intention si r notifies tlis Ifeiss

itsi^r wJsich is objeot is all ggwsiS' - ,

ia^ miss h< -*.'>««;, i3ve si^eeies so li,.v^-i>.i^«. is tl»t ^i^y w.-*v.;.

the soul in tdiioh it is te«ds out to IdtS etjeet to It*

It is thsa a si^ tgf 4iiob the lOii;^ is knowu

OBos IKbe sense has 'bees ooo^letet throt).-'^- ^' '-

xw.»>«.^a

of ta&e sensiMe i^eeies it oan ;_<, nse

knows its mm sensible end is true in re«;;sr<i to its ovn sensil)l«,

not twin '-.^r- »'•-'<, 9)),^ It has received e^t its na^uire iwrmits

it to re

Page 230: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 231: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K* 0* fillerSt, ^Itart

latcrior senacs* "Skb tint i» ttm wnsta eqarwnla, the iatertor

fttOttltsf vhioh r'<i«ivM all tbc ia^M«i^n« tr«n«Ritt«a to It laar

mm ftv« Bmars,

Stoit ooaes ttM ioa^jiiiAtlon, a £tooaiV «ft»tla«t froft tiM

iMWMi «iaiK» la this iiM% iii« latt«r re<»«ii^es linpr«Mi<Mrui vtimrft*

aa tta* fflxeMir ooMMffit tiiaa* ^'t. ^l^art iKMMa * ^celftl faottlty

to «K»lAi& tm atntiPPtttoa of voeoivad Sfl«iir«MiiMMi« iMroaaaa to

roeotvo ia n»t to oosioowo* fhia la «bo ianstaatioa*

It ia dUt&aot in tain IMS thi follwln? Interior wrnuo.

oalled th« i»iMiatiiitii> l*liil tKMMMt la ma tM ty^tRtjyi^

ttriotl? eoaaiaavoa Idio alMmtftoie la a oollatiTO poemr irtioa«

fiasetion it tbo maStUiixie or dividing of t)w iaa^^ ooitaonM

in HkO iMglOlKltOB*

Ffoai Al^aelf voeouatln^ A^emoAf ^

l0io«Afltt^ 0^ ^'« viftaa aaatiaatlTao It ... .

abioli fOf It are dlff^rar -^ ^" -oltfontal focM

poroolvad liy tho aatt.«rlor '^ tt) tho Imier

gonaaa* Tha? ai« e>iailtiaa iia „ foeivod tgr tho

oKterior sonaea* oat onljr rooogflttM ^ ^Mi tiMOr oinao» ooatin^*

tiva* It ia tgr thio aonao for osao^lo timt tho aho«s> oho ao«i

o w»U fA9 ot onto tli*% HO mat floo, throa^i Uto •intontiMt*(36)

«lft«iMnfto4 ^ «ito tatottov aonao*

Page 232: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 233: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Urn a« ll*ae

St* AllHsrt

nsumy i>h« tM^^ of mm»ts mtmnm th© tatamaa* p»-

etlvfld tv «!• ft—tlaBtlVtt. i>lo3rlns *Jm» ««» «»1* ^ relation

t» «i« a—tiB»tlVft «« %»• imgimUim do%» to r«»i?w% to toe

«9nson 8emy'5« ifea hM not ml; «iO Jweria a* otbor «BtiaBlo

Ittt «Uo |in^«ir»«tlau"^ 99mim» «» l^ »•«• ayUOfflotloftllJ?

tho BMW? of »»«t ^klnm aoeoretng to tbolr ladlvitiial Intcn-

tloM. a«ar? ana fgri^toffiSlflL*'* "wT*'^ ^^*^*^ ^^

eonaidfaroA m t«o In nedo ana fanetSon.

Ii^vtmt proeioldno toko no te^ to m% mj^^^vsA

^jaintoola* Aoooidtng to »t« Alport tho j>h«it»8y can ^ eoaolA-

««^ ia^ aaft otylcte* Sakon la e 1»fOad oonoa «feo t«» iif

eladoo tbo li««lnatian, ptentoiV owl tho oootir r' ive o.era.

Strtetlj. bovoftstr. It otanAo a« Aoflnod aboro after t? tv ion

(41}

«f i^viooaaa and asaaol* Xa tho fi»ot caraWaration. naael;^.

, -Hi

roi^l^oet to AOt, ol>Joet and organ. ^i<^^ o^

dtffovonoo In nind »o ean undorotasd at.

titat int«%iono r«eelva& fvon aaA «l»oa#l tfeo acnaoe, bat not

Mfifft^bmA^A \9 tho aofloo aro ayfribOBAoil la too difforont mgn.

ftsotf th^ «ay *o aor itttloraan lyjy^realto a«l with thoeo tho

ItttollootaaX poooro ooatoom tli«B0Olv«o« aaoonAler* aaae are

ronelved t\ intmtlona «hloh novor oan pvooeott btironA tho

0^ u r. BO flrot «9<lo rofioo to tbooo fowo ohleh aro «iO

Page 234: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 235: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8* d. mixm 19$St. Aitert

pri»Dlpl<» of is%eU«ett«l icmvioc :elr re«Ut«Mi«

In th« i^MantMtJgu On tho o^ier : Af«l« %b«

int^mtlons of djUitBfit«fal ot soitftUc

fiomo to reMdiTC the sp^eies in «» fe* as It l« « pvimii^lt

of ts»«rl«dgt la «%• B^^w offle« of 1^« a^JMtttooift «rtiilo to

r«o«iY« » sp^idMi po TOttosara a^iitiTMllto t<A a0t»i»t)ii,ta la

th» tnaiiMaa 9f tbe afttegtiy^

Thew r«iMiin Vtm Umt thra* a»dM of a^pMhaRSlm* ^«

«» nmr aU« to M;r vith st* Alport tt»t tlir c is

that of tl» iflosEtoi^'ttflB vldLlo tbe thtx4 tae;. , j^^

9lthottt* tha m—tlBiRtifR " "f --- '-oUatioo of «\r _j,

CoKtngr ao« to tte fouorth oad h5 9t«^ to ^

apitfclkomioiio «e oteonro that it i« nothing ot^.

in vfidot tb« qoidilitito of ^ingo^ domidiod fM^ oil eosdltiom

of mtt«r is rootiirard* This «ij^:^4fta3»ion is pxo^er oel;^ to

t}ui tntolleict of tsen vAtieb too «b its ot«, oroai

q^Mit^» coBnxm to aU ttiingo in tixe or. " ':>

~

ftll thteii of viviofc it «<»nroo «« the *

are anlToroftlo und ^e <5eflnitl;>n .

vi^tl^ be« tbat shich la i»roaioat

'

ond oowwiM to oil thingo in th>

Bofiag crrlttCBt tk«B«i li ^ i

Page 236: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

\

Page 237: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ior

R, 0. KtU«r

port of idiis •!!»#*«? «•»!«»*«» i?res^fift«

to in»Mt «M «iMttt«i «• ^* Ubttrt a..

U thi«s it ^b^nmliMm wOMrtMBM v^Mfrt* fyf*^— — r,

tl» »odj !» i« te»«l««i«» •« «^*««* **"^*^*' to^tl^fwr**,

M« o« «>• lirt«Ue«t«»X «>.a 1» la M«»U«tlon i^tb tte l»dyi

aaft if «i. hPrt a»ifl liMi 9tmiB^ th0 5«iliit «% taHeh t^ lt«rt

M« hi «1f «o«f«i«it«l 1th a tMk tot wM«h te e«i*t ^ i.«W

Aiti»««ii «i« tet«u«t»i •«al«»a «« tetrtl«et w R

fMttlty of that wai) i» i*!***^**. mtm^l^ ttoe booI U

^la«d t» th« UKly thwa^ It. •ttMr »•«», -hloh •»•, m

^ iMm ••«», ^t,^ ft intUl^eta in th» »«i wl-twM of th*

aoul lto«lf, a«o po«MMi «W i»t««a to it. in tfel» •««#

th»t Hy one i^rt of lt« fi«fInitlaa tM wol It » Eff^,

*^?

«or>orta> Coii0tq*«tl^. athoo^ th« tuteUoot 8ect.«»a»i «#

10 o^ntt f»«« tl« te4y, »«t tho iirt«Uoct 4. to fwrt •

P«»«» of tho 99<a wtd^^ moovAing t© owt^n loser poww,

!• JoiAoA to tho tody. »• i^oUoot ^^^1^ ia a i^«« 0^

ttot •hioh l» J«»iJi«^ to «« toajr awe not ItooU o«»wii<»to

•1th tho to4y tf«r it ie «t • piwt Of ««% •Meh 10 Joiaoa

to tho l»fll ia •• f« »o i* i« i<»*»«li *** ** ^** oowawicato

Page 238: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 239: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

-4?

«ltH iiSiAt «aaMflail«fttM with lfe« ixxijr* with tihls vttAl ciietimtiott

aidftt S%« AlD«rt een Itom tajr ttot th« ist«llee% ooaeaaiimttti

aot to t2i« I»di3r tet to • $«f«t» vhleh In its torn do(i»8 lto«lf

owwanioaf to tho tedjTt auMljr* to ttte gbaa^wtft ead Huroveh

it to tho tMngJniBMon ana ttut tttaww* .sil^r 1)^ an^ iae«no Hmn

iB»9B tito eool tmmitk trtly a «tUNitaaw»o «« e tottgB ;x>tegt«ttvaa«

•IfifM tfearod^ its imtanti j^o««r« It egnmmloatot to the to^*

fbaa it is still tsue to oay tlMit th« hmmn ooul lo •«$wnito

OCT eoge et wgntiem wi th* OM luoiA a«i« on i^e otli«r« that

it oott ttoquiro tho ^oattlis of thin^-;9«

'fhis aasvor to the ipfoU<n if «hat 3t« Alliert hi^^elf hiMt

SMBde it to M in oti^^kxmlly mttAlitAilr"^ -^ '"'.-ml definition of

tho mi\l and v^aeiBias eoneistofitl^ f)c' to it t^>r

his lotss life* fhe eseeaee of ^e «ne ;t9 in the

Atetinetton «'t« Albert istentet it ie one thiae to eeoKganieftto

to the todjr la ea aotion ot paMion of the soaX eaa quit* iuioth«r

la^im ito oaeBMBileato to Vmt raiAeh aonMHiieftti* to the !»4jp«

«* lure veil camre tBAt ^me intellect is n<> j^er in & IMil^

MTfiBai imt t^e psoeeee of Imovin® ie mt ftdi leted* mr

«loee it even was ehoat VltlMut • teoeptloii frf c lonaiUt

<^ ijaefliaehle oer shotttAOiOflb tiMi ifeiiilMlA Mits maiHMPii'

deee iteeif eoarmmieate to the IxKJi^ in ^ie sense thet its

VfmtM.<in ie never ^«rfeotea edtimat the oetion oy passion of

Page 240: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 241: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

->

« «Bt$or«al BMMljiW* «ldl«lb te the 91%^ of tho i^laantagla>

fh« tftatinotl^ para^p«r tmtk «f the int«ll«>t i« t» aoatvttuiit

KtanMi#i tlw qaiTwnMOi iHA^h tea 1»ttii inttileetttiitljr TistuaiBii

mw fvom all <soiditiU08 of th« mttitr In tshielai it coUlato sJUsir

nlarljr* nlte ertdeantl; then It la aot lv iStf aotioa of wg

fom ii^reasoa tm ai^ is3rpor«»l po««r tMt the mt af 9a&isw»

otmariiag 1« eoai^letodl oad pcvfoetoft tut ifati:>oi' It is ^ o

olKlple oooM^t of tho adDd lOiicdi i8« at «« oIsaII Oiocovert

aaifwft oft »«ip0r« H«neOa int<dLlt*^oge io tm oporation

of t^e ^oaslUe latoUoet ««s« tluftt pooslHo intelltMst hao

t^oo. Ijroti^'** In 8«t t^ ^Ms fruitf^ roo«|>tlon o: nlvoreal

fo«n e%otr«N»%«d t^ the agent Intolloot from t)^« j^c»x..u«ome*

Shot to irtvir iit* Alport foolo it 1 s ^rao to 0^ tho(46)

laotton of «tkO i^hottttMKU* io t«i»i»ot<id at tho Intelloet*

So thoot ^* jjhMrtaRoift. that pimwt of t^ ooaX oatt

lnte«>lor oenoo vbioh r«eoiTM tho yhoaHkao .e oosmoetion

«^ioh aUooe s%, Al%«rt to avoid m,, tho imam ooul

i" se ooanoaioatoo in all thiajp insMdiatol^ to tho 1»»dy*

For, aithoogh th« InfcoUoot io aot a jpooor la on o«0M» ^^

it receives fieoa ISiooo po^Mrs t9fhi(^ ovo aatiunllar ia floq)«roal

organs such as the a«aooB saXL^ l^.^vl. , ^^-.-^ ;_>h'y*^^fs,?. ShO

intellect is in contacrt itftil

affixed immediately tO oa Ofifjail*

Page 242: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 243: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«'

imy ttvail iite«lf of the r«ilitl«e 1^ the aeneM And simAtaiyt

imt tiM» int«Ueot ot^aaoa to nssa of & docyr im& ooi!poroail

p«v«rti l{^ offAw to r«e«iT» th« fqbob or iat«lliglli|« i£»«el«««

Atetraeted fros their conattians in ^m ^^gm%Mi»m TvatiSkwa^r^t

m this state In ^me& smui X0« tl.e ratiaaftl sooX hM Immb

plaofld, in the ted^ %imt it Mjir 1»« i>«tf««t8d in div«r«« kao

V tb« intelleetaal ead mttX viirtufle* 1^ tbe tb«oi<^o<a nr»

ia f^ t t^ all tiifi Nnflfito throu l« atsooofA Aotl

(80J«id«a*

StaMigh this uniQfto oiotinetioB* f!»«uKi«ai <m hie att&l

4ennitiea f^t toe mol una ite eet^peelte nature, :l^« Mi^crt

ie otixi free %e my tint ttie eoolt Ham 9^ffm,tm, wmaim

tffMptftl. dU 4i%ert»e eneeer ie tiie mXy «a« «m^ he ootoa

give tflMiev «ie tttrenarlainoee tn »h%eh he hafi sli^o^tt hlaeeif*

»«% it will iteels eaali^ Ha it 'the

new etlll aore cMMs^^Mneiire dect in >

'vAiAt 8t« Albert is to ea^ rufm. __ ^- . . .xjg

to the eorkiage oX his ogent listcUeot*

Page 244: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 245: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU

TIM tttlrl*^' «ermlmIo^ «im cMtib ^t ticuisliitiiHii of

«iiitt «hft% th« agent tn%eUeot is »«pftmto t»8esaa« It Its aat

tfe« ««% of «9 e^rt of th« bMljr* rw*titi«RawP6, It 10 v^yi oiOj?

mnftrat** tot It la wiHteoa wd iBUfa^ i«»<KWiU« m ««11

(8)

«« being » •ttto»t«ae« «bl©fo in ft«ta. la oo fw *» It !• »^iuf-

•t« MA "f*-*^** the •««% int«lleet is ^ifti»et«rioti«&lljr in

t^iUMit vitb tb« j>of»il>l« intoll««e%, t» «liiol\ the «s#e

yiN^evtiee naet te ftttvi^t«U - ^;«>t to Ito iegiami^

ilit^« bflwevet* the eseni i»t>

tttkelleet in this eenee thr.

j^rinei^ie of ttee reeeg^ttoa of i&teHigiUe «^,^.*v, -

tee^^ve pwrer otOy* whewM t)ie •««* i«ot i» me

iMStive yrtnciple of 1^© inteiU«l«l«tt«

mtelleot ie e eateteaoe cruifth i* ecH^eereljr

ita ealpetanee or eeeeaee it ie ea % •

Stow »t, Alwrt wiB fttUjr •«*• ^«** ^** 3l»io®»»

i«yi ivl,9Mel had tett#t a B4|pMiiKt« •««tit inteiU«{«ae« wHiefc

«ee the leet mteUijieoee* 8e to *t tfcl

J^tint Xnt^li^;eac« IrtafllRtee

mA th»t it

Page 246: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 247: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

IM SMW t» Itof* teen foaA of »«eaUiag «l»t »«ild«i Wla$ th*

BK*»go—Bwp «ht8 Mtpiurat* Xntau««ntt« vm th« last csaa «f

Mni it «ft0 ttet to «lit«h mn «m ftnaiy sodttd «fta )mm« in

a e«r«« it we a i^aeiple of iaa»rtaU1gr*

to M7 ttet hia haaar : as>NM« vith tha atgasata

Maalie IntaUigaoea ia taa r«0j^««ta aad Oiffera fvoa anijr oaa

point of Tioa* fbo polnta of ainiXuflt^ arai (1) thaa^taot

iiit«ill«et ia aeitbMP in a tmljp at a pooar in an wtam^i {&) nor

ie it in a U6y aa raeaiirim flwt Vbm gfaontaowa of Wlim tm

tikt 9oaaiU« intoiloot ^»%m* *aia diffaranaa eoaaiata oai; ia

«ka foot ttat tfea aot of tha ««ont istaUaot ia asrvreiaad apoft

IS)

tba piUHntaaoo \9 aWttraoting tha oaiYara&la fro* tb««»

st« Mfeart oartainl^r knao iiai.% im we» doiaf thaa lia intra*

toM« into hia 4»atHno tha notion of aea aa a wiinmw>> 9m

afia* iRtalioet ia in •Mh mm lika Q»to a a«t^ga«ata intallic^c.

!t intalioet baA ita ori^ In in tha ao«a« aa «o ba»a

-• '• "-v-so ^pa of to^-'l- " "^If 08 noeaaaocjr in tha

lisbt oi '^ aaalk Ir »• iaft »«ao «a i«fim

at»ro of itc tho li or« towqlatalcatilo*

'Hia agOBt %

itttmoet 6., -. ^c it i» "»»• ^^* **» •«»* ^**^^

Page 248: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 249: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* Allwrt

ift t«lcin«r ^* l*«t X<it«Alia!«n«« of the Ax^Mana ana j^lsolag It

oo«l>t«%«ljr ia tMh mn «• %Mt aac: I s^j^nl

Sat«Uwt* HftTlnr; a&op^A M lawilt fxoa ^7ieem» it 1« too l«t« to

•top now* Of oo'upoo h* matmimm^ ani dioi&t«M3*«t«8 Avie«mift

tgr Accgrlas tiU^t tbo iMHttt tntelloert ia a se.ar ^Uo

XntelU;!3«»e« tel ttMn noUti:. 3 his : j

tMno^latntias oaA votoliOai:^ *' cst«ri8tioo of tttftt JQator

f93nmrm» la £^int of faot ^t* .sii;»<$rt is ^iolitol^ dootr

tfto AvoMon doetrino of tho waity of the intclli %

ofjHdLtRMcraoljr o»as«iTtng f^....

onoe, «a

Intrinslo Jifjrt of tho ockU, «:terB of thirt.

orate Intellieenoo* tho ooal io ia r^ <9& io la ti^c »

otift tho o««nt inttilloot is in %lm twU &s «l»l toot sfl|?iki»t«

Xnt^ligtneo of 1^0 ongt«a'iiMnffiono hionuKdisr io over '

1»io ooalo of tmu Ihao tito do»t»«otl>« ^^ %» liotor ?^ \..v .. -

io tho ooaotruetion of Hio baam ii#iist iAtolloct*

Roving 00 odroitl^ ron»v«d hiaeelf from /v r*

tlotod in l^lo eloi : ttMHt IOm o^tnt int«ll«9t is IndaMLtn..,

povor vithla tho aool itsolf St* Al))ejrt toko* to himoeli

fMT ottthO!rit«tivo ooofinsation* aU Altwt toUo oo thRt» oo

Afervooo oojro in hia cwoMiitary <>v> «:>,« rg Ania». tho luanui e^mt

intolloot io A part of lUho lUMwa souli it is oia^o aaoA'

Page 250: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 251: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St« Alhert

«ainl7 eftll» lat» «a«»*l»n lit. ilfe«rt*» tai»»li«4ff« of Hi* 4e«t7in«

of AV«rfOM«

X% htm bMo e»taUi«lMA «•% ^««n»M* MMMntetar on «^

AS(9j

tTMiolatoA isto lAUa About 1290* «o kaaw tbot «^a •»» » ^od

t«i 70o» tefttro ^Hi* ^Itert «>oto hit s—» 4o Cggategit* .%«

AfWtooo ftotoftll^ twa^i* Ifcftt not orJ «»«lble inteliwt

%«t ftlao tho AS«ftt tBUail««t 4» «e^ ^ ^^f «11 ««ea»

fko tooetloa ot this ^wotttso tttos isi di4 wt. Ubart roaA

«ldo CoMM»l«t7 of i^vorvooo oaft if lio Aid >«« Maid onoh a

yottMr solMm has oooa tho i>«oUai lutf oaflvoro Ifeot ontft

fioMoas *• ivofiMii wftlly %*»#• ••»• *oo f^>rel -n to ^i«

oonoi^tSMMi af 9U Al^trK lami* aftor « tlnn rfxaxlne of tho

C«nMR«««or» thoy l« o«pU«ltly kawa «« aosl U

vote Mast to to. 6inB0 teth It^o o«wi am tho j^

oBt «M« sop»x»««» Avorvooo €9m 9^9 pi»iU«l» to«iro«n tholr

9M^«fftic«« "atlo stoiaUolim, ¥*• salasa aMSt piofcebljp atte&et*

«dst* Uliort oao, 00% terla* *»•«* af « 8t?-*Twto i^ootUo i»-

toUoot, oooU OB? "posit iMfUec^ ' "'

Page 252: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 253: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«!»«• M tlkt ^oMttU* iiii«ll«et and mm mk* of tt a(10)

^OD«r of th« ftol M %)!• i^ftMibl* iat«ll«ot ap9«ur«a to te«

it V9U14 ft««i bpntw ttet WMtbtr 8ola.Uon« gi^oMitftL oa

the t«)ct of ik?«rfo«0» famlohos » Aoi^or «MsfUmtian* First

of &ll» 3t« AlbHrt mo ooijaalntod viUti nm vcitln^ of Avnnraoo

ttO oorl; «• t^ <ii^to ftt «iiio& £• vroto loio stmaa do Croatujrie>

Qm voaltb of ial)»rflOttoa oontidiioil in this work as wwixkX^

%» the roUtlTo povor^ of on aatorior oerk, tTio 'afooteteo im

Satara hcoA givoo ewoe i4oa of tho Ute»ataro au AilMrt t»aa&

on hio aniV0.l at j.a»la. In th% flrot too g««rto of tho gowaa

do rroBtarta tiamte aro ov«r oovontsr »of«r«nooo to ^irorvooo* nmy*

(JO)

of thM vortetta ^fftOftationo*

c i!^t thorofo»« oajr tlaat ovob in tiM a—a ut> vroatagio

S%« Alport kaoo of tbo iootarino on tfeo pooaiUo int«ll«et ao

(13)

oi^aiwto aM mA^M tat all nwa, and of eooreo tofuood It*

in hto lator lorte »%• a>i»r% irt@o«ouol? attaMso tho orrot(U)

tl»t tboro io ono ^ooaiUe intellect for all tmu Snt lAiat io

aoM iiv«irtaBt at prooont ho dooo latw oiM* hio lBi0idod«o of

tho tno pMltloa of Avomooo on tho asost inlolloct ana ro^eeto

(15)that pooitloa« flott tho otarprioincr anA toAmntly infi»MfttiTO

toxt OOMO aftor ^t« Alhort hao dovotcA a aolatlo and thirtjr

re~ll«a to tho 4i»titoo of tho oniolt^ of tho poooihlo intoUoet*

it 10 In foot in tho voTj^ oaao qoootlon and oaljr too ««nhorO

Page 254: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 255: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

116

Utw V»t Si* illNtrt inform as thnt /^erzt»«B states In lU

T» AntoRt »«* i* *» ***•• **** ^'^ ^* •**^ tb«p« le an ineors^tlbltt

«Ctnt Intellect, «a tewrt&l «uxi laeorni^tiUe poealbie Intell*

not «ad «n laftgllcettai aae^tiia faahioaM In th» po»8llil« tufkell*

•et l(F tlM «<g«nk inttlleot toA It too is inoonn^tilile. fhi»

iUmtaftting pwMHi^ oeetuni ia Uhm ve^ !&•% v^rk .ut« ii-ort

«»•%•* hi* tt—fcBwtttogto** s^sMMMH^a only »of wmi ««fc» f»o»

hit d«ftvc«UT« arti«at <m th« <»9tHm 9i th« anicitjf^ of tMt

(16)

pOMihl« iateUvet In i^wmnm toA «ic lAUa AtMrrolflts.

fe %^.l• 8t«rt« of afnavs jawt ffewr* ar« »«t 9t» -ib- i-t

eultar« tarar^pl&)tina v^^ioh t!.« dth«r MftUnsuv a»di«rwnn% at

hl» trnaiam H« had altiMi^ wfoUe AvcrroM htoautf* it ms Ms

pvof•Miami duty, a^ imw mt lor -^ t«tt \M€<ixe w M»litl«

that it veo \»xt « noiaiml mfutation egt& «9[^alslon for M aheai

o«« thAt ATttrroM «»9 qai^U; »««*U«I latt ftei^iful ««rfiee«

Ho»«9«r, this iKW •prt»g» fJ** tht li#t i«t of th» Haa/m

ftolftitifte Just qpotsA* »• Still havs th« iMt j»art of oar

•ri^tnsl qttsstlon to otostdtf« mniljr* ho» «••« st« Al*«rt

hsYs fslt that Aire' <*8«b* InteUsct ss aftgs fmimnf

tb«ro sr« a»r:,.' vi^feieb tBasqaiTSOttlly stiilw

tbst tlM »««t intolleet io ^ , ^ o sool srA in ttj« eaa.

^vsitoss MMmt '^in ti>« soul** oiOjr liQr oot^ of Oi^extLtion» howsvsr^

Page 256: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 257: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

I* 0* IIIU«r

otw or all of ^^fte t«3rU» a« tM lam'faRU^ itid* mA »t IMMt finish

%• bsaostljf eatsriosAd tMt «ir«rrots tooiglit t^»t his texts teldljr

SKld* PoUswiK^ i« « li»t of mm of t)s« lints la «h« tfelM teok

of AVttrfosc* eota^entat^ on th« im ^Btgm of AHstotlo «lil^ sub*

otsoUoto ttOs fejQ^thooist

(1} It Idoo diolt Arlstotiios post, %m4L nsoosso tst i^o&svo

la gwteft yfetisaftli Inks ^uui dllT«MKitloe« ecilleet vlrtitten

eetioais, et vii>tQlMi posslonls^ «t aielt i^osrto (poa tttrctqao

(IT)pots 9i9M ost nmtam 0MmmHUs» n«|Mi oorrqjptlMlia.

(t) St ocmflraovtaunt hoo por hoe, quod |8?i|piaovlt /rlstotdlfio

^tsKi ^fnusnOo Intolloctas <^«e>s oaci^tlt In mis» a»liooa»« Tide*

flsur dOHiMlftro oalvorsoUtcar foxaos a astottlo ptim, doinae(Ifi)

liitoUl««ro OSS*

(St SI idoo o^inftadam ost <|ciod isMi sD^oftalt mHa ox wtvmm

iUrlstotells qood In oiitas sont daoo a^artos Intellcctaa. (pann

nCft ost roo*pi«nst ealt» osoe doeloi«itaBS ost hie, alio mtsa

est ogCTBc ot est illa4 good flselt tntwitlones, qiuui sost la

Tlrtato laeiti^iaatlvoc ossc sBfWitoe Intolloetaa astosialse la(19)

«st««

{4} Sod oplaaadisa ost giLMBd In oAlas stmt troo partos latoUocttto*

^»ton «io ost lattiUlectus roel^lcns* Ceotmdo outoa ost offlal«ai«

Page 258: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 259: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(20)

(&) i.t em n«e«m« Mt iavcslvl in »»n» ftniaft^. g»>ft< 6ioltur

lttt«ll»ettta. Istas traa alff«p«atiGi0» nMeiW« »t at in «e ait

aai^ «ttA« 4loiiar lnt€n«Qta8 eimmfOmm 9»<l •fficltor mmMd0 aimilituiUalt et nwepUttaloi «t qosd la i» utiera 0«8t»iil«

p(Urft« qaa« dieltcur i»t«l,lMituB ••ouadMi qiMd foett i»tua in*

tcllMttM Qol «st In pot«ntift, iAteUijivm aaada in Mta***et(21)

fiMA ia tft cUwi ait %«9Uiii |iM»*««

(6) iK qud fliportiiit jfamf te <i^a> iatlli^^catim aamti

ia anim »A i8i«Ut«ti» #WM!l»ft •«» tiottt proportio »rti«(8S)

flell nd nrtifi«l«twi aillmji Mdls*

(?) iJiasma i«i«ar qtioniiai iotelleotaa txiattm in a»ma >ml>a»

Aaaa aetioma, aaoviii^ tpM ftttfil^aittsr RoUat qoertvR un» cat

da ganere A:Bslonl9 et eot I'^tellLTere: at alia 1 -'-mgs^

(23)ftetionia at cat eictyaharc fmrnut at 4aBafl&re la^.,,

(8) CHumian lllaA, par <ppid asit Ali(|tiid aaan j^oitriim ttationan*

aat foraa: naa atttan, ^ola a^i^wap ;;qr tntallactaB iki;ent<B>

iWMityaiBi aatianiffi sennxUMiu aaa«a«« aat i»t inteUeotaa a^jsmm ait

(M)fannft in aaMa*

It ia i^oaaiUa to q«»ta at laingth attiar taxto af a aiailav

Tain ftoa Avanoaa Mt thaae ahonld suffice to atunr tui th&t st»

^^•rt bad aa diffieult^r is; ^lasjLag ia ^vanroaa asactiljr wa&t aa

Page 260: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 261: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* J»llMr«

IMM ««« t«ct« iftd^ Mar tbftt «1M (Msmt ln««ll«e« i« «m ftoA

9m i««»t int«ll«et fiir &U mn. maUoHne th« smmt ia i^ieh

st« AiWvt MM ii>«*tiBU;r MMilfl« ^vcnoM at tti« tint of tlk«

aapam A« ^'reftturta. he odula oMily iunr« t«iA this tft flMNMi

sni^ fii«R MMtt to 1M a fl»y« t«aAU« lolaUan to tlui

qMVttolu ao««v«r» mir int«x«»t ta tbls ^Int la dlnetoA

oMftfl^ t«v&i«» tfe« ftitav«» y«r «« kmm fall voU tliftt ;ft«

AXUaet atron^il; imi«««in<ia thtt inirliwio ebi«««Qt«r of tJM a«lMt

intelleot in th« ooal* !l«t«(r^«lM» »• oaa mjr mm ttot at*

AllMvt utter h«»lt*t«i in looking: 6t Anototlo thtoo^ tb«

oyoo of Airtoonno oad Avonooo* mo InfInnoo of Ane«m« ties

ioM iatopoaftowttrt n^ to aoo* Mt fvom thlo j^olnt 9xmx& t^oy

will ooOii IM ttttUtoS tn & wasRor «hi^ will votmlt la ea

ittiuNAl M^UHneo. ao *U» o« B«Mrt iNmlioo thot no* oo iiofo 4ko

•cook lotoUoet of ^vloonm, Al^uMl m& ^t«ft»«o« ^vcirisod

Into fto nw^y teWM ««««t latoUooto o» tJtfW am ^mm ifmmmm

Is tti««t te y«ftUa« that t»)0 aetlTl^ of tho homa airont intolleot

r«BBli» otrltclfl^ ol^^lor to tho '*vofaooa'* 80i;«xft^ «3«n* i»t«lli-

gioeo of tho AsoHttte «o mot loMOdUtfll? pincvtA to Intoot&^fto

St« All»ert*a doioni^ttoa& of it*

Page 262: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 263: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU Q« ]iai«r 120

Aa «« have aXr«MSjr am» titt j^MsilAs intellect i« aa ta->

iBAterlAl p<Mr«tr «I«»m o^oot osn ooljr ito the laMit«rl»l or 'Uift

iiBtv«8»l« St» Alb«yt bM tftiA ^tat th« possible tat«ll«et is tk

^•Mlv« p«««r Iff iriilch tb« MtO. mas iMWoat all %h£R|^ in kaaw*

ledga* S»t oaljr am th«re no tafedli^sildoa al]?««ajr in lt» b<tt

it lao^9 in ito«lf» ^i» i^wer of mkta^ thoeu It ia (AtaagtA

V OMBttiiiRg oth«r ttsAEL it»«lf tboa «nS «• know this is tho

sa:«Qt iat«Ueot toiieja tatooof tH* «lMHii» fnm ^m ifvtmoBg 9i

naSsrotaadin^ to th« »et of m&mmttoAtamt '&dM toq^ifw en

•t^^KMtlk s» 9lt MImrt «ill ssj^ tb»t IM |>i«*)i» o^kjloet of Iho

iittolloet is &»^ins othov tiAii tho <qp»i<IAiti«s of ttdnge »)>•

^rooto4 ffooi 9«rUo«iJL«rity« mtoriftlito said its eo»ditimit«

aad Ir^ssssA oa tho j^ssiUo intoUoet* 2t is <ui fiossaoft

««ao«AVRbl« rot %i» £»c»s»ikle intallsot^ nn&srodl so I9 thi

agiRt intslloot* fhAt tkum la tho j^nciae sork of tMa «sint

iataUoot?

St* Mbsrt has told as that tho tt&mA istollsot is an in*

tvissio eotivo povsr of tbs tamtSi aool* ti^o aotivs pttooi^lo of

^3bm ixit«lU^)>lsa* It is» in a ««d, itfeo intolloot m» ott

iwia liM>oa?»« 'l^ p«opsr oprnttian of siMh i«i intsUoet is ^sofol«9l«

^ifst of ftll, it abatrttota tteo latoHitsiUs foras} and this is

m'^avkae also thaa awkia^ ife<«i aisvlo mA amlvoraal* smmU^, it

illHodiJUHi 12io poaaihle intellectt Tor it is tmoiaamafy tlbat tho

Page 264: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 265: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

mitvti^l ftpMrlMt M lam ae it Ut mAtemtlg \m al«B^ in th«

o«iv«d in th« p9MilbI« la%«Ueet it oEsot be r«CGlv«4 t&«r« in tlM

iS^t Of tUc •e«iil in«*U«s«« llMn this point of rim tlMi piMibl*

iiit«U«H i* Mid to hii«« « tiifftlA oM^MTiaant first, to ^e

•giRt* •• o«qpl«rfe«l tQ^ its ii#t SBft tlMM» ts ths f»ra« sUeitsa(90)

fna tiM ptentMMMt am MLa^ aovsA soA £MnMd V i^in« a»s tbs

ftttt of VtM «B«nt itttsUset is sew to tiic* ta» fiinwtioiis* It

stetffiots 1&S ttnivsrsal «p«eise aaa ^t«s thsm ths %«taer sf

OBivsMAls i^ieh is ts te> lanstSflAi sod Atnstsrialissd* «bil«

it siflmttMMsasijr illast»&t«s the possible intoUsot in orisr(31}

^«t «M tmiirsareMi spssies tmg MSifiS t])«9s»

Hsithsv th« tt^tnt w>v tbtt pMmilAe intsllsct hM ««9 fMM(SS}

in itsslf Igr ttfttox*. H«iss it is twwsssufy thst ths intiai«ot

tntn to l^t pcort of idis ssal i^iisb is ia soneoBisstion vith

fSm tt)t99 M«it7» ths i^iifciitASt** nth it «h« intsllsot osk

itsdf ft«wwnlftAts» With this pomt «#tin in ths pieture st*

Albsrt infiftriw as ttet Vtim «(g«nt inteUset mkm ttts oaivtarsais

in th« pos8i1»ie lat«iiset tgf stettastinff tlnsa ffon ^o sltfint**

(S3J•KM in Vbisb ths;r an in jotsptis* Unm «t^s sot of tits ft^tet

int6ll«et is t^sn ths i^tantAsns tgr stetsttotti^ thstmiT«pssl to torn

(34)fmn t2isn» fhftt vhioh is Alwtenstsd «Bd vtdob iafiMWi ths ^ss*

(»)iUs intsllsot ie th» uoivsrssl af^seiss of ths t;iia<;«

Page 266: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 267: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

at* Albert

UB

ffeio tntelilslUe quiddity «tf *fe« ^S&im «» 9h^mt oC tfeft

tstelloct 19 «« universal and »in«« %Mi lo eo It lo «o»eot

to M7 tlMt tb* 9V0|^«r otkjeot of th« IntoUeet Is tlM oRlvars&l*

la the iOttl the fora 1» 0<©«kPkt« Md «l»»t««t, tr*aA mA diaa^M

«o It 8«re fr«» all oonotrlotlom of aiitteri tijo attala»»* of(37)

ti^Lt aonftltlan oaot ^ laid at tho doof of ^o a^oot latoUwt*

Aa iBftivootliMr pmUen ovopo <v at «ili ^Int and It lo

t^oi If tbo oHJoot of tbo intolloet Is the oalvoroal than tbo

unlvoroala aqaolaO or anlatt may l»o olljootai of tho Intelloet, fiat

ttilo roqalMO sit, AllMrt to piovldo for «ie roc^tlon igr tho

9M8IU0 InteUeet of wlvorealo of *hl8 t^* t» 1 re la

pnrtloalMO mqA oln^jularo bat o<tttal2ilj^ are oo^rato fr^Ms

oattiW py oiwa at «Ni«ttiaito 13»o oay he will prortfie lo

ola|»l; t9 otatlas ««* «»* «»iy <"»» *** *SOat latelleot al>-

©traat a onlvorsal fo«a from aattor isit It o«n aloo a*et«»«t

tliO universal ttan fcie i-rrticulftr. fhlt lattw a%otriio?il«»a

aeoara iqr ocsiiArBtl intelll^He fora fson thooo tAklnigo

vliloh eppvoprlc i^a or that partl^-ilar* IhaOy ae

«« well remMMr* aalwe or aagolaa oaa 1» alkotaaetod f»o«

Vtitt p&rtloolAr Id Qttod m% whleh bi^s»«Be to *o Ito ^rlnclide

af IndtTlduatlon* 3o there lo for St. MlDort a twofold ab»

atraetlon, ^t It la aot oar iturisooe at thla tlaie to laqalri

aiV MMre of It than h» hliasolf haa told 00 here.

Page 268: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 269: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

5t« Aib«rt

int^l«ot th«r« AM fmr «!»»« !m to atrt vo&t to r««ttnt it mAm

t2i« dalla of art anS ll;^* tOMk a^vnt int«ll«et aik«s th«

foms aliioh &i% universal in .<4t«aojr to 1m aotuftlljr uaivonMA

ia tti* pooolMo intcUoet* In IMo <q^atlon It Id not ^mllKO

art ahleh «ik«B Its fttnt and iiidiae«a th«n Into s»tt«r« S»««r«r«

ttMi InuiiiMM or tl:i« c«s«nt £r*telX«ot la not to «»*« «rtm«i*l

foiao and Ic^raeo tlsBm Into amtter In th« fiBOhteodag of aa

oitlfieial thing* but onl^ to anico th« form aotaalijr tmivorsal)

tto ftwtito potror Is fiot a4 r^ imt aa IntoUootuia pooolblloBi*

B«M« It ta ^«ooil>l« to llltOR i^A a/?Nmt intaUoot In ^e tool

to &rt aai t^o itoaelUo Intolleict to ou t«r» roe^Lvin^ l^e fotat

f«(M "ttMt asMit* 4aat ao art ladsMV an cirtlflolal fom into

BAttM' ao tho a««Rt intaUaet ttunoo^ ttM uniYoraal it l8|g»rM«a0

«t ifea poaailAa inteUoet i^erfoota and aetwtoa 1^ j|^«w»iUa

(89)intalloet*

^t« ^ll«rt aOttlts 0Baii3r tlona «bat tli« oiatlXo of art ia(40)

t*9i^ Ariatotla» bat hia intafs^^atatlan of it ia wtiotiiar qi(2«rtion*

So talla oa that jirlatotle di4 not Uig tho atgwnt intolleot

^° gtP^'iioitgg liiEO art anit tko raoaon ikaa bo did not ia ^lat

art ia a hamtua and tho .a^pMat latoUoot ia eartainly not»

for a habitaa. far fron boiag «a OMential iiart of tbo aool

Page 270: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 271: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•umtiAl peurt of %k« sotd* M« It Immi it lUc«aM* ttt a faafcttay

la aiU CflBse At !««»%« tint tluraa# it «k« Mui mjf Mt ti^eiip>

«f«r it w rnieUMB mA to thit enft it &om not n0«t mqgrtldAs eat<-

•Idt t)>« vottl f^ the ^irfMtii^ An£ «|Mar«ttAtf ef ttot Mt* M%

0iay i» tiii« oM ©f iMHiitttii In 3t« Ai^trt fi«iii ^tiiWii *«rt

Id* tet««5>r«tatl<m 9t tli« otmll© of art «hi 1» iMn In alnMt(42)

tH* 0«nt fftihi(m Is tte AVftUmu

st» AlMrt ie loafto to !»?• « f^^vt ti»t tbm tst«lU#Uo

nratt rmdtrM i«b1v«pm1, Igr th» tt^jtrtt i&t«U^t« iMftW « V"

Uttios to l^t of v^lAh it iff tt)t tom^ fut t« tiM iMWiia* ia>»

tttiiaot \o mvim to it •oft ttaiLmim it la ««*• la •• <^

aa it itself is in tet* SMF«f«r« of it««lf tho f»m it not in

aAt « e9a«il«t« oniTtiMl. cnft this la one &f tlte nM»«i trtty «tt

««iRt Intelleet ie ii««tt«d* &mh • auMd •!»<» «!«• rite «»

tto eea^»«rit9n of %h» CNpnt iateUeet te li^lit* AoooxHtng to

St. Albert U^% attaBt eoloit wfeioli eve mXff in pet«a«y tt *t

colore ^neet» to thet tMer toy ««f««t e«Uoire the eight, m

thie war ^« •e*Bt inteUeet ie like li^t« for it tat wltea

viMit it inteUiffible attoKilly wolTereel 1»tfc ft»r aM in tiu»

^eeiUe InteUect, ^nat «e li^^t is the twml »«imA vt

aelor eeomaoa aata» ee the actnt iafttUeet it «M Hiwul cgtiA

ef inteUi^iUea aMetftia^; to thaiv attonUtsr at aalT«Mal»

Page 272: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 273: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* Albert

Hi)In th« pM«11»l« intellect. Bat U)m ftU «nai^&«f «aA tlnUM

iHxiB m»0 al^iM^ ««• oftm^Utf «Mm tliftt of art» artiU Uiap«t

l»» U^t la •striy»ie to th« tlmmX ffmnt and lo not of ita

«•» oenotitatlon lAMrflM tbo agont intoUoot ofi tiio oovtravy* to

Ml Istrtaolo pooMTt within tho v«i||r MilMittinoo of tho oota Itsolf*

im«ro is a» aoalHi that i^* Al%trl rtaA in j^riatotlo« aa h*

tau.8 u« ktaaalf* that tho agont intoUect to Itice U^it, in

tint U^ Mdcoo ool«« mXwi%\xis in potanogr to to colon la eet*

B«t i«aa Ma «9^>oaltiai of that alnlierlt^ toara a atiiieli^

fWfftlwaioo to tHa ta^liMfiatlott of i^rorxo^i in id^ notion 1S*<at

tho ooi^arlaoR to ligut la a 1)«tt«v o»a tiiaa to art ana In t^(46)

vfV3r oi^vr of tho oi^aition.

It remiBa thm Hiat in ^o dootrino of ^SU ^Ilaavtt irfiavo

tfaavo la ft onlToroal agont IntoUoot that It bo tho po«or vhloh

«itoa ov brlngi anft nakoa tho tntm In aot and 4i«r It mkm Vtam

^iamk^ ttiolr onlvoseal lJit«Ktlooa« tban It la t&a psrinelplo

•f foyoa aa art* Mofoovor, «h«tt t)M aoM asmt intoUoot i^voa

to tfeoao foma tdnneo th^ aaj <wff« Iba poaalUo IntoUoet* th«a

(47)

It la mtdae «Mn» *a U^ MfeM Oiltn*

In ox4ov to adi«Mr»t «• s^« AtbaH hlswalf 4IA» tho 4«fliilto

Itelta of Vti» »«rle of ^o aaont intalleot and ita roal taloo In

tliat aerlc «o moat ooavoh oat th« pr«ela« aataro aatt nmmlm af

What wu Atbart oalla tha latalXisibla objeet of tho latollect*

«• tl»t mA «• now dlraet oiur attantlwu

Page 274: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 275: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9U AlWrt

i» ftlM* a f»ct «^Kt *b« hawai Inttlloet keav tmllty *y »«"»*«

th» pv^f^ otiwt 9t %h» InteUeet, Slmt «»«a i« th« aatiaw of

St. Alt>«rt l8 amxm of %*> poMlWc ,>o8itlon» on «h« ^a«moiu

Flwt of iai» th© oaivcureca ooa 1»e ««e»iA«& <»«« *!*• i?**^* ^

onlvflrsal Is pwdloAUe ot nun; «aii 4«ftal3»5 It .^ro^^tlj «oal6

Bi'v^ !»• • t»u«r of msfim* «»• i«jiv»»»i i» tt»t i^cfc i«

{^reAiOi^U of iBuayl^ S«ie8 It fti>p«ftW ««t tht oaivoroftl ftt

u«lT«r««l to only pretilei^lt 9t mmg mA thi« oVtli>*rtljr i«»W» »fi»

idth iiwro loirlooX prodleoUUty* «» ^W» i»«ll«ftWii*iy •«'

1^0 oeneo^t i« tho wfk of tho Intolloct, in thlo fiwt my

tfce onlTors&l 1» not la tfelnsi tJot onl^ In tho ffllrsa. ?^ la

«aoh a «o)Mao» If «»• 9Wi^«» otijeot of tho InteUoct Is 1M

anivoroal, e«a If th© unlvoMol 1» «»* «««« «"* ptodoot of

tfeo inUUoet BXaoft I* wwl^ « iii^oolUo lOr oar knowl«d^?i»

<*iroij^* thooo wtlTerealo, to Dfioir on o^irttafiK Jw* goaora tdoat

thOMOOlVOO*

Page 276: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 277: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Mmthm pon title tuition holds ihatt 1tti« oaiTomal i« In

tfWMi Mjr in things fsv ths siqp^s reftt«& that If it is not In

r«ftlit]!r it could asvsr te prefilMitsii of r«ali^« <&« esnMrslitjf

(8)vbioh MlOQtp to tho eooo^ts of tbo nlad aost %o in things*

St. Albsrt fsels tlmt he is gHag ^ mik tho i^Mdlo 9mA

to tvtio solution, Kor hin t43«ro o«o throo distinguisluiUo

Mpsets of tho oniTOreal* ConoidoariMl la tho first «^oot tiE^o

QSiT^rsal is prior to the thing in tso tn^roi first, inssnudh

«s ftll thin^ «ro in tho intellect of oed so in thoir fUrot

li<^t| 00 tho tmlTorsal bos ft eortain Q^oelal h^a« «t2«ro*

It is the oose of tho Intelleol^ial c;«aso« sinoo tho li^t

of ^6 is «M ftm of thin^ itibieh flow froa 8U1 ondi inf^Mm

ttUai^ ^Ms mdOt lMf««ter« ie j^oMsd otor q^tklg in order

thftt 2St, Allksrt my toll of tho sooonft my is tMM first sii&ieet.

Bore tho imtVirsftl is ^rior to thin^ not in o priority of(4)

tino hut )gr astoro •»& mtHmtUBMrn oa «oll so hgr rsssoa* Zn

this lottor sooM tho oalirersNa is o oortada eosonoo id^ch

is ftlwolate iSLSSf '^^* ossooeo or a«turea eoasidorefi in

its totftl se^nrtlMi froa all rolations is ecOled on esofefitigi

or pfttaro* Tor a^^ Aibeart ttet nstaro« taken in itself» aseat$

f»9« teogf oadstORsOt el^bor in sin^ar nsttter or in tho in*

tolloet, is sn intelligible roalitjr in itself, it is, in

offeot, o«aslAtis« ohleh osists in itself, an anoa qoldi in so

Page 278: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 279: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8t* AVhvrt

(d)

Ib ord«r to laittrvtaaA th« tatimt« Munrar .stirm Igr 8t«

Aitert, it la l«{>«rativ« that m rmltw that In miatftlist

t^ «Elot«nBe of AS lnt«Ul^l>l« mocmo i^lch ie a WMithlt^s

In 8«. olatin^ in ttsalf and having aa othar «Elat«tiee bit

that of maah an aosaaaa aa it is* It has aa aaaa aaa«rttiaa«

^•re is l«l mam talsl^isa tint thBi« aatura as wmh*

fa said tbara are throe dlatla^nlahahle aafoeta of «h«

anivWNMa* fho aeenad aapaet nam roiprds the wee in ^inge.

fhare %• caaa mture ia i>artieipateA Igr MMisr indiTidaals

either aete or g»twitla« Zt le eo«elA«redi net aov in so,

iMt fNM the point of view of ite i^taoes to eeoaBmioate

itself to seforal diff«rent sahjeets, or to eaa aahjeot (as

in laie ease of the am} ehieit is goias to reeeive it» In

this realm it is an inteUi^He natttre tnm the point of its

aptitude to he reeeiveft Iqt mmmmx eol^eets* Beoee it is

•Ottaiiaieahle to laMogr ead has aa aptitode to ^ve foKv:!l egpe

to oiaegr* In this eeei»)d weg^ the aatisre oan he o«ll«d a tttiTer*

eel* lio then «e have to sa;^ i^t ia the first o&eo« in ae

eatjatqas this sane aatfar« is not j;>reelsel^ taxi pro^erl;^ ostll&i

{7)a oBivennl*

Xa the ttiitC azA last of theee ooiisideratlons ^u» anivereal

Page 280: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 281: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« 0* vitlit tm8%0 Al1)«Brt

l« ft tvm in (Wt ft^gtraottOBJa. in wi fMr a« «mi agiHtt iiit«U«»

fit MM*v Ittk9 iriUiar lor ^Maing aa the dhNiteM mA AlMrteMitiair

«M ttiAttfMl tw mt 9ittf%l« liil«tS<i9%« ^t pfop«rti7 o^

mMiwmleftlAHty of th« imtajr« lioqai— ledvcrMdy ana (RuA

«niT«r84ait7 iM a ^oeslUli^ vhieh U onl^^ atttos^llMA Dsr th«

t^gfsBA tnt«lleG« ft1bgi«y»etla@ ifnNsi Ibe ttiftlTl&iiftlii «liat 13i«3r

liwre 0f «&• lnt«Ui^U« «KNnei«* ?hl» iavolTes s%* Alb«rt

in 1laii» iM^aior eonelioiida that fsotYavsftUtjr la en ««t«nl ant

osm@l«t« aoeia of eadet«»e ii»i«ai^tat«3 owr ttvnln^ to t^«

iatalloet v^wreln ^^he mitn^mXg a»tt propwl? so oaU«l» eaa

1M) foont in ito «m oxilriNHiiO* Xii this aaiwo it la tx^m to

(6)oagr with St. Alport that qait<twai« aan oat titoi in jattolioottu

In Mkpid votwio tlun Hiat «tt bevo is tMst (1) a naturt

or oooonea in go a|ii«tOB»t (2) an i^tsMs to bo oon«mio«to<i»

)iSr oliloh tho tmivoroal io in th« thing outaido Idio aitiieit (3 ) «m

aotoaiitsr of l^ia c^titotfo oaiotias <>niy Ib tho IntoUoet*

Homtov* oa mgr ai^ oisroolTOO, if tho oOMonieAMiitj of

the oooMttO aadlota in. r^^ m& jrot if it iMoomt aott«.l in

FKiltio onijr in tho inti^oot otiat oottiaUtjr io that aptitulo

of oaiiMiioahility to oanar ohich io tho oaivoroal? if it is

onl^ in tjio iatoUaot t't» nh9r% has oaadored ftum the o^dcilo

x-oad to ^m firot of too iim ^saitiona hotaaon n^idi ho «a«

flOtag to aako hio oay* In point of foot, faooovor* tit» ^ihort

Page 282: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 283: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

s. 0* mixmtU9

ts •till on t5b« rond of hl» eh(»l««« Awl fe« hlwMsU w^lftlna

pr«e«linBt is (MM a»t of wwon rIoji© t«t al» of oateteaeo*

C«rtetn It 1» i*at th« lnt«Ul«lU« aatoro, r«ali««l In « ii»H«ln

•tngiOar, l9 tfc« M% of thftt m^otuv* tad « fwort. ORtiw »n»-tU

)

tittttHvj «*• t»e rel« For thl» MMon tJi« lnt«Ul<4W« aat«r«

is «iit«vi9r to tho oaljolotinfj vttAi%$ of *»l«li it lo «*« foraftX

(12)eMi«» Qtovto«il7 th« efttofo bos to cc^vo a e«rtadn boing of Ito

9mt fl>» tho «fld»t«»« of HM aatoro i* tho ««wo of «^ oaV-

«t«M« of 9»eh of «!« lx»iiTid<aedo in obleh it ie »8 oo^«

•» it hfto tho ^» tetb of » «MM Mtt of on oooeicc*

st« Albort oeald aot mm»9 lb* 9»o«l«tt of «tet kiwi of

tKlotoneo to aoerilw to thio nttiro in «o« if l* io » ««iT«r«

•ai in a oonao in o» onA jr«t if anlvora^ity onljr «i»ta la

tbo latelloct trtjut i» m d^a* %• ••art M. AliHart'o oawot

to «»t th«r« i» » aaiwwlool «ity «*»i<^ i» i^»Oi>«P *» ***

inilTldunl, bat thow i« aloo » typi «? «atV •J***' ^^

«ho««et«riatic of th« mtoro in —

"Ebo fliot is iaowwwwi -^

eaUo tat tho ooeoM lo not npognant to oenwiioafcllitsri It

le, ia point of teet, even «i?t to %» •oMwHaiAta to oovexftl

dlffotont ©ttbjeoto ftnd to bo diotrlturtott Mong <*••• »*•

yaal •xiat«ic« of %m \xntfVP9eX$ whethca: it te svoM 9W

•^coiea or any of tho othoro, U mt that of tho »ifl<s!Al»»|

Page 284: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 285: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

tlwa ttet of 8ljruai].ar nansrleal onlty. fhis unity of th« wlfmi^

*'^ i« go cxlgtwfl Is o£ aoolx a vaaX^vm aoEl riodble idiia t^t

It ddM mt srMlnM Hi* pottlMlitjr or <U«tritivition in wtagr

114}indiTldaals*

£ia0&. n najltjr as tfa.i9 liis;k]Li@9 tbat tb« eseesace^,

^3, ae is

lMlff«r«at l^ A «lag>l€ Ia^ of 4iff«r«nee or iqpMslMlitj^^ ^ut

ft e«rtain int«lli^tl« a&««rt can %• In seventl dlotinet iativl*

dwkls at one Ajaa th« aftM tlflM« tliftt is «o mug^ tl^ eesonee

tftiroa la — m oadottaft anf xii lo mtlda^ tet th« M»«»ee or

intcllisiUe notoro mmlCjufd^ m mdttatml In the firot mj^

«• hoY' eited* Ftosi ^ie point of vi«e it is inaxttete^m is

ell thoto Ifein^ eltlcti «re of ttt« sine opoeiee or s«nae ete»

In tisle «i^ It is not etrietljr rt^iRnloA «t ^^edloftblo of mam

nor ie It* on the otbor l»na« reii^tiPAea ae indlTlciufaiBea.

Batnor, bore It io oonoiAorea in ee fnr ao of itooir it io

poeeeeoed of one onliTiaoil reUtlon to tai V^inm or to aour

in tiAt genoffil olaoo* It ie o relation of inaiTforeooe of

i^iejb at^ AllMTt lo oi^eokiag* Thot £>reei8«l^ Io tiiO «ee«cioe

«» hftvin^ ft oertoin m1»ur« ofMi rotio of «oilv«reeli1^ oeoorAi^

to ^hich it reftlljr oasicto in ee , in its fv*f iBftetera&afttiaa

tis)

•• aeither univeroal nor oin^^ulor*

Page 286: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 287: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

i.9% OS tatk« roir caeupic th« mtuura faoewt etrietl^ It U

mAHMt «tet MricM laas nature eap«bl« of ^<ilas p»«dte*t«d

«r «M9Qr 0liigiUiar mm, nor la It 9hat can S9 scdii of one oin^

oljur awa* It la ol^i^ %im sAtare howp snd thftt Is ftU th«Pt

i« to It* So tlae qaootlon vhoUtMnr txwo* ^ost as ti^iO natoro

toao. io uniTtrool m »ro}f«e, one or aMsgr St* Altert vlll

r«i>l7 tbot aoowdlag a« tono lo i|pg(> it lo none oi' theso*

•iaoo aono of tkora Sofino it and all of tteom follow tt« ooeo

mui dupinl on Ita Mlag la oo iaaop«ad«tt of them oil* In

iteolf it io aolthor an yxm xiileh is c^atra^otoz? taxi

9^9»^ to » «nlUta4«| nor is It fi^t<^* )qr wHioh a mltitui^o

io tspoacd to a siSi^iular* 3o far a« st* Mi>«rt «aa eoxMomoA

lOiia io MNwtljr tiAwt ^ne««m aMmft Igr a&jrii« tliat tmiveraplo

(17)

aioc oat uBUffl noe <»t aalte*

1?ho roaalt of iirie«»Ba*a isfliusieo hmt* is bat a i^erticulf^r

oaon^o of t^ vtolo totio of that i«aM«ii*« vritin^ ao roll«et«d

la St, All«rt»0 o«n «or4»» fflth ^vieoaaa St, Albort oaa oay

titat in thio s«Eis« tho uoivcraal io eallai natoro or eosersoo*

itriotlj opoakiag* Juamwvt, wo aball ooo that univeraal applioo

onl? to tho rtaolt of t^« ngmt lat«Uoot*a vdrk* aa roaiaiog

ill a kaon atato ia the poasiUe lnt«lI«Qt« That thia ia eo

io afiptmt £roa t£;o teacta aajring ^^t if« in ao* tho natore

la noisier oniveroel. nor aiikjular it haa to lM univaraftllaad

Page 288: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 289: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R, a. 8lll«r UB

V «ic a^;«REit 2)9ver at tk« smI—•th* «^«b« lntell«et« Of «0(ur««»

if it e«n fee anltersellsed It mm% ^ jpr«l«ely l»«eatt»« It U «f

lt««lf nolthvr py(^^«r« nor iinitmrsal* ai^th«r chm noy waaf* ^

itii own twii^ tMn It le ij«ltli«r «t tet«ll«ota nor t« in^g»»it».

«s^« eino« it Is a»t 1^ deftnitltm «i«h«r singular or uaivftrsalt

nor is it in a su«>xidait nor in «h« iatsUsot* I2iis mtvir* 1§

{18)

aot v^9i^mA i» aaivwsalit^-*

mis Isek of 9%(«9isn>s 1ms wu9 sidss* It is noiti

MStt^ so that it waff ha^sm that this aatttt* \m propor*

aaivsvsia* oas or ass?* Xb this ssnss it is not »t all a

l^oal universal mt in it««lf aa ia(p«rfsot and ii)eM|>lets»

(19)

;i^ fatkSsMBital tmiirttrsRl*

Xt rsnains foras to approslaats t^is aotmt? rsqairsA of

an agsnt irtellset in sn«h a wall pt^a^MA atihmm of thin^.

As thm aettvo intrtnsio i^vimii^ls tfco afie»t Jntelloct htm to

pfo&tes* 9S havo Immr told* «l»t ^9 possitle intellect io

to rsseits} anA it t^^i to p«o<los« it In tlM i^essiias Intsllset

^Aiaii is illttadnsd ^ that s^^t IntoUoot* Of that en^ m

srs tsactoally esrtein. .^ t»hat of the ofe^set cm «):iiob ttts

ae«nl intellset faaotr. '.'3 raaoh «• oaa ssy sitli tsasttsal

oartaintyt ths agsnt intsllsttt has Iwfors it an inteUiaiUs

osssnss alrssA; In sot slth a rsalitjr of its owu inoat it

tesrs is alrssdj a oniversAl* not psrfso^ly in tha ssnss in timioh

Page 290: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 291: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

m 0, muw tM8i« Allwrti

41«iAi|« of WHQr* iKit tm^hm %n Kim nvmm of na anA«fk«mlil«&*

tndlff«rant «i»»«9ffi« wlaJdH, !»«e^tt9« of tliKt v«x;^' indlfr«v««M

ttm t« tmiv«raells«ft t^ th« am^otst iatellr t. £r. 9«d«r ii»%

Bow trti« tiii* is e«iA ):>« e«an V iP«»^i^lll%' ^'inrtAia pftiBt«

%hs rotUKB 9f th« £)»»» «to««rv«d in «^« MQ^titlaa of ii^«

AMBtriiw of tfc« ^ «rt fe?Bi c-- ;:jr. <sct pla» «i« j;i2ar«^liim ©«a*

««|iMtnt on tire rAa3.tsr'T, « Alttert thflpe is vhAt oajr ^i»9U«itl tk aalMrta esism»9 iMeh !• «ti* v«»Sf «M«noe of lfe« th&n^*

i^his It tlie n«l«r« ta iw ^»»iw> it id tb« wlni!iteia» ftitaAl,

or« if ^«r« %m •. i^lmtig«^ •€ »mtk mAmm in mv «a« i»i|]i0

gmw iiM«h to nMliiA %• "Dmi iMtar*! «•«»• fMrnfitciod i»tv«M»&iiV

on i«i 1% I* <fe« BKfaw^^Mi fy^^afu* i-t i^t* A^htrt £m moTNr mU tU» latur ie %t<« lo^ieta aalvavMli ^^t i« tu «ti««r

i« 4^«ii^, Off orit^jLm, ^a&mMm mkw «' it a psw^w *aa «•«»•

» prtnclpKl 0f ^e te«if^ Of th« *''^ "j th* simc iiatttr«« «ith Oh*

adAIUofi «f logioi^l unltersftilt » ^ th« i»rit^li)X« af icao«»

Page 292: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 293: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1» s. KiUer 135

fl«t »t. /•Ibwrt is nt^nt I©, In »ff©ct, th»% tK« prlw*

AX>« tb« •&«•• Bo«ev<ar, th*? ftr« not principles In th» •««•

mmuHr cv«ti tho?^ fai^asMmtali^' vnA et voot there ie m diff*

«r«i«« Iw^stmn tbtia* ^ar Qaavezil«DB« «• «iU (l«a.l «ltti tlMHi«

prineipte* In thtt ttn^n^r, r«Alittix« «tot tb« yttsturko erft

jRpplie&Ut ta ^©m &U in toto* Uie in«iffer«nt mt»ff« is th«

primii*!* or tiie b«lng ©f th« tlbinf} cut iiaiTSTOallV * &&A9A

to it* ftaA a« it v«rtt, ^s^pma to it* Whils tmeiinim th«

pviz»eii>l« of ths boii^ it hfts bMMM Si %M ••»• «SM* ISQr Utiis

«A£ed flluiif»et«r of anivpreallt^ R ntjneiplm eordtjonts. In

«o far BO uoniversftli*:? I^^pms to it th«r« r««iata « lo:|tc«d

(21)

«eaiT«ro&i predioaVle 9$ tmafm

A* lon^ last w« em «l«f 3i« Al1>«rl wmsA

^y sftying that >*« fomn totlt>g of SMf»t«it hfl«>* is ao«

th« uaiv«r8«l but rathsr is that oa vfeiob tb« agent intaUeet

itsslf emkes th» tmiirsraaU ?fAt ft»»m as princlpls of beii^

hM a rsalit^ of its sva* sirm as tets ^ui othsr foros in

8«e«!&tcs« Cons«qa«ntl$> n.» (nOjf tUa^ assassar^ to Uim

this int«lli.^U« «»s«»e«» |^ri»oi>'l« of Ittiasy or nattaral

(g^ua into parfoet oRiTarsAlitjr as a prinoipis of taaoolsdso^gg)

•r l»gieal universal is tha activity of tha a«iBt iottllect,

ff« hava only to raaliM «»t tha iMotatninatioa whieh foaa**

Page 294: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 295: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St, Mb«rt

«bA prwMiM th« vaaivvTMl in iii€ int«U«e% I0 r«all^' is re.

«Mkt is «iv tb« ei««nt tKfe«U«et haw flMrfOy to ooop«rttt« «lth

tlM natoro* i^loh roall^ i« Indlfftreaty in th« jpredoAtioa of

^o uiilv«ro«l M objeet in the i^««iU« isfeoUoot* l!te opv

ttion of tiho a^ont intelloot 9mxtim on tb* pl)ftfltii«% for it

•oatoloo this lna«t«miiiAt« aatturo on ^i«4rtioul«rlsedl ia tho

•ii^j!al«v» ^ the aetidn of tho n^tnt InkoUoet Is eseroiooii

IB t«B w^ot th«ro is ft MfaroAtion tgr «liich (11 it aeto <ni

Vb» imtttre iWtlf and (S) iUvnlBM tlw j^ssiUo int«il«et»

In this tngf tiio iob^li^Uo eoooowo iMGonM & la^o«i tmi*

f«r««CL in tho ill«iigSxw<l iKWoiUo iiitoUi«t* 1^^ owtoosttno

—Btio is tho £»MK3<a0t of lAiiia^ St* Alport ew ofyi this io

«M eoo^loto tmivoTMltt

If tbit wottld leeA «n« to «»; thtit for the o^ont intolloet

18m 40% ia not difficult » it fre^nkij^ oni^ hM to •teovto aM

ooao Ms«ti tfto uniT«r««l» ^t« iiiUrt hinooif wonitt set oftil «!»«

point into diOi^ato* It io. in f»et» iriMit ho o«^ ht^olf*

"Sbm intoXioe^iftl aotiV l^^roK^ tht agont lnt«lloct» nakoo tho

onivwoel fOr»o« But it io a focUo ntkin^ roqoiri^i^ littlo

«aE«rti9ttf it odi^t )»o oalloA « oMeiat; ia th« semo of mki»-

Saa • diooovi«j^« lor that io ^ooiodijr what tho cvgont intoil*(24}

oot dec 01 it finds ite Atreas olroady thoro* In ardor that this

Vs jpossihlo tho almost oast assorodX^ ho thoro and «• havo soon

Page 296: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 297: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

S«« AllNHrt

ttot «nt b»» it l> thtre* fiv%h«nmr«» it is tiltngr* tttflrs*

<Siilt esM MMi 8it«plt nfttiiiHit iiii«b towafei »« i« iieith«r in

the int«41«otft nor in ttitBg»« it Is itMlf on» altiam lat efe-r^cr.

Mid id M fMT fts it ia in ^xe int«ll«et it Umim luAtliMr 9i

tlMM* «luunMrt«m* : or tsictlfis in th« int«'il«et it i« sot

aixLjoler but «stir«i^ oxitlNttiMl* isnftt it i^sic*, ov«r ftoti Atovt

iMt it (toea not 1m«, io i^«Nrf«et snivwtftlity* ilii« th« «8«at

iat«U«et catm ^ Mi^MULiBissg th« anivftrvat, ^Ireeiljr int«lligiMe

ta aet, end mmllQgf t>at to )»• aaiT9MliB«a«

fhM Agent int«ll«ot tivAM itself «»iifront«ig in the last

aii»lyal»» «il^ %hM iw^M In it« ioaet^rtsination ancl i«iiff«i«»

mKi9 prcMottd in tnt ph«nttw> It scm it a» l»«inir e*pa)»lt

0f oniverffalisfttion aaa 0i httng r«e«iyea in tljat stat^ ty t^«

p«MiU« intei]L«et« MtaAimg tt Hius ia eineataiMNNUi with

tlw lotTicRl univarealilgr vltiafe imji^pma to it* CMMtunraBtlj^

tht Bemt intaUaot lUtss&aat tbe j»o«ettel« int«U««t «ad

f««natfatM it Igr Uvt«««iai^ tha onitrMnial on it* Ranea «a can

ajr that this tigmt int«ll««t, oonaaiirait aftair tha fartxion of

t^ ^taMana* aaa^axata agent intalU^(«MM» Ium TMooaw* Iqr

virt-uii of tha fotn bi^n« atraatfjr in set, e dator fttjwtry*

BaTing aaan tliftt ite ori/rin wnd natojrc ia alnilsr «a cannot

«0« fail to see ti»t i^ «^p«ration is little ciincraat rvoat

the separata egmt intalli^^tnee of tha A^aMan philosoyhars*

Page 298: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 299: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Iter can «• iiftlX to »m tht^ ti^ mtvwMMa iilkleli !• »i^r«-

lin^ta m t2»» fiHtrtb Aa^NMi of «|>i>fiiiii»i«ffii fts » ijzlnei-.l^' of

knovlas iKlvtt in r«cUV <ui • i^rlnot^e of iNHag* ^"^

oxloto for oaeb univorttal o wt«g^9ieii4 bela^; 1^ iiAch

It «ho oeao » tho wnlToreQl* aaoro lo In wollt^ - -

eity of tho «xlo*l»^ o'^oet i^UKSi la truly proAloAtod o

thliit oaeo 1% ttoa iiton tietT«rttaii«U 3tia lo m m^s^oa rooUoai

St« atMsrt sfi^o it «1^ his luaidf vik^ov^* his sl«67ea^»ftllia

^p onft Ids hoaft hl^* fbo ooooasee 1« m\ riwUitlls inUliX^tdL^

iHit ftotsiftlljr »• It l» m mtfik vdA wjotttto in tt« own fi#t,

Ana to kao» th« uniTOiraaa io to kmm t&« OMMaco of th« thln^

iUi its Aptnooo to be i>4H»('tod to muagf* ^. troe r««Ut7* thio

ftftturo 18 noithor tmtvo»«l In «»0 Us^ea 8«n«o» aor is it

slnxolari It «ddts tnfiis^flnt of oaft iBaiffoaront to ««ar taw»»

(87)

li<l|^ «• i»2r lukvo of lt«

Vtekt la the plttoo of oooh » Oootrlno in tbo oooaoa^ of

SU -AlbwVo thoQ^t? iit* i^tert aavsoro that Quootioa Iqr

«KtrlOfttin« UUMOlf f»oa on ai>p«i«at <ii£ri&*lty. If it oo«ao

fffOft oMh o ffooitloo M tols that tho a»lTor»»l is «qt» »i« ftaa not

ym at* Al%«art vi%% tstg: %mt erMcii is mX^wmX is bc$;nuia

« OoaM imtc tfc c ^« ososaeo ooasAdorod in so* ^t

I* aast >o i^ti«Bitl, - raind that his endnrntly ooooooo*

fttl dlstiooUon In thl» fMilAoa fSfoMS to §sm»^ 999y«t mA

Page 300: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 301: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ax* Albert

im

m la^lcfil anlwraaUtjri tfc* «rt of lt» «af«wi«llty U the

^MimtB of «ho »««rt itt%«ll«o«« AnA this aet of aniY«r«»Xlt7

f^ tbo •oBwiob ««MM» ii1)oat« It la tiuoa »ip'#ly ^nrom ^« foot

tim% %hf Is in go etttddit— »1 caAstmtU* ^lo XOfile«l

«Rlv«raol Is iitfood prodtOAtod of tho tbia« Itself l»«oa«iiO «eoor<i-

iag to tlis oet Of its taalTirtallV it Is in «»« Intsllset alons*

^t ftotnatd on Id <aioid ost watlvsgsals^ la ttiis j^orfsot ssnss

tte aiilf«i«4 1» i2ffi*J««* amractsd . m tLs wjr jm

iri4«lt «t •!• nnr f«Bll.lair» t»m id Ga0<i sot witT«r8ftls» Sgr

aistts ^ tlils j?«sltion 3t« Alljort rsastosd in oontftct Hth

^In^sBi for as he !»« Jast told t». If «is ononoo wars not

really in wsUty w« ooald siot prsdieats oar kniwrlsd^ of tbiogs.

S«0M»o tb« prineli?l«s of bolBg «nd the prinoiplss of kaoolas

«re ons« In the sense wo hsvo seen, t&o tawfci «m remlao

tn oontaet. tJirouija ti»t io»«lod^» witfe **» ^iinfis from i«it^

he drs« it«

Qioeo natar«8» «ltb ttislr ^soiUllt? of Meontns «iti»s»

ttfdTtrssl in tiis int«Uoct or ttngnlAV 1» tb^" ^ ? ?«, wb««

»»•"»# iw^*^ ^«^ **^« »»^ retains end ««*« loses its

gtfti^ of r»Xit;?. If It vmm w>t so o«t Jmwlsdgo wiW *««

way on pore orte^Boto of the rtUid's mat oonetroettoa. in*

thftt Is sfey St. Alteit os« s«ar thut the waToreel la the alnd

Page 302: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 303: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

IkM «a intcntlaimX c.-jastscvar , i., ....c^ lu t'l lntev:iiar, iiiiiv a

ti^* kor MMiai •f iitfii<^ tfeM InftiAlttet haeivra the thla^ of i^il^

«Imk int«U«et«(! foma ite tb« i^^ure, Xn 9f^«r t^t thefe "bn n»

jdllfbt fyon MHSOitjr tn«n ;:%• <c;i&«rt tea eela %iiA% wm* unitrer*

flol io vtAl ae & ^rimij^ltt «f ^dng cuH tJtiat in saeh iadlvMiafil

lct»»n iMMsoffli locde»l oni'rwMlo* Here te tl>e iaete^)h^(H««|

J<i9tlfi6fttieai f»r tte« «ad«t«aB« vithln t^ VM? inStvi«^l of

Qu.1^ ao orS<u«A ta t(i« hicoraanjivj? 1^ its pmaXtfkt 6i*ipt«t» of

tsdveroftllty* And no one of %!»« aat«r«« di«MilT«B tho

|irop«r unit/ of tiac inaivld^iia viia^oet*

«« msjr In mnMMtsr oeaoltaoloa »«*%• tliftti

(1} St* Albert romttiao conototonl vlth h&BMMiAf u «• hftV*

««n tilA in th« flMt flT« olkBi»t«ro of atir ««r^«

(i} 9io r«aita $aA plvanll^ of £^mt in hia tfMtylao io

fn&lopatoldo*

(8) lie io otill Att«iiiti&|g to iffl(90»« ^i^<m an iyriotatolioa

tondnoli^f ttio taak oi \tm»i ' vmtimixis inteUi^iolo

« vadioolljr neo«« Ifttonie t- >- . -^Mon oonooptlcm of roolity.

Ftos iiri«totle» 90 olsoorvr , oor^iin ^jmmmX notions

oob Aot tho noeoMit^ o£ < ito e^eoioa* a eenoible

Page 304: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

I

Page 305: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

orifiSn 9f knowltdg** th« diotlnottoa of m ««tRft coKi ft poasiUe

la%«U«ct» produetion of tho op«eloo ^ t)«t i^ont tn«<ai«et rad

vital rwi<!«»B« la tlMi p««iU« intotloet*

(4) Hov«vw» from AviooBOftt vitli «)»« b« Iw^m* ^ s^i^ iwtftlBst

^o notion of tho ooal, ta^o ro*Utjr of «i« is»>is», ^o» ^smioh

Gt, Alliert la Uao liid«M«d to UilWrt of ioltloro), tho laUff-

«ff«noo of tho nfttax«, tia notion of hit ogont intolloet^ oladlMr

in wifslrt natuaro uA 0!^«r»tion, bat bnannlMA*

C0) SM tlwO^ ootroaM of Avonrooo «m notoAi it «IU d«v«l09

litto « l«i« «aft ttoofal ctojr*

(6) is th« tmmn a^wt intiAloet ^oeoaea novo Uko a a«tor

foawggi it hat loot anA low to &»•

{7) Ovine; ^ ^* tiali»En of ^« tmlToraals in St* ^b«rt ifeo

•gttdt tntellaet, h«»4&j Uttla to do *«low itaolf aoioita ft^iaf

aUTOly iwyoiid tfco ^tor forfaafwa to «»« i?rlnoiplo of ito owyt^^-^-Y^

in ft mm to ^)od in aHiat iMit i« is. It «Ul root no»t

froaomtiy fioa ito Utioare, iMr t&« aai3;a»^8laB illndoation»

e^roeiftU; ohanffoa in oot^anf oitb AVio«ia» ftud Av«nrooo» io

atottt to ontor*

Page 306: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 307: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

s%i, Albwrt iMB jfitvnA ti»t the prlncl^^lM of teiag mA

the prinoi£4«s of kntfvlMj^t «hil« nadftlljr dlfferttot, eur«

vadio«lijr indi»tlne«« fiMM« s^ineiiflim •£ Vciag tef* Witt

plAciBd In their eetfcingt tgr the eetive end fenMi.tiYe lijg^t

•f QoA* Oaee eo eetaMisheA tbi^p ere ntrertbeleet never

«i%hoat> tliftt light* itte iJU^t Qt i>o4 at n> tstmmt relln-

q!Bd.«luM ite ixtflottwe oa tbeee tUln^ foraed aa£«r lt| it

(1)

ie e»«ilm»iijr joiitift «# tt^iib

SiMfti « li#« l« •« t»l«Ili^i%l« li^« $m& ^e ol^eete

«hioh stand in ti»t U^t ove to it net only their exietenoe

tttt their T«r9 Intelli^^iUliV <» ««U* It i« trat to »«^*

with iiit* i^ltert, that tliO ioUlli^iMlitjr «^le^ %hinj^ ^eeeas(2)

ie ^rea than V ^od ftjaa cwiatAiaed In Hie li^^t* iMe things

are not glvise off this intelligiUUt^ vithout ^e U^t of

Qod «dded to thenu ^s^te these fon^* tlioe eoneidered «s

ender the li^ifat of God <iet on the seal not onljr ^ irirtoe ef

the li^t^t or aet of the hamta. anient intellect, tat also in

tlkoir intelli^ifiliilit^ onaer the li^t of Sod ishioh is in theef^*

'ltm.% pwmianXjt i* «hat iMii^ens «n the side of the ekj«iot«

Svidentljf' with fii reedjr mA» netare vhiob is oe#aUe of

^elofi 10ii;io»ll^ univereaUsed the egtat Intelleot luts not too

Page 308: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 309: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Qfih to <lo« ii«ia it ten ttlU 1«» ta 4» liMIM M* tl»t th»*«

of eed te9 ^ettowd 0ii» aad oontlntaXl^' aad wifi«uitagljr obIa*

tains in thm^

flM 9MWtiofi tttisM twrarw a« to «h«th«r 006 io wisteia*

i»0 ftli tlMM ol4«ot» ta «i« Ui^t Maa jr«t wdeind «m «#•»%

iatolloot do its wurk trithemt mx^ smro aid than it teo «4rt«a;»

Cortftinljr it hao t»«» tr«tit«a rcgmli^r ftom ti^o oUo of 1fe«

•1»i|««t« Sat U it not A pMwr ot tii« ooiU MUto to tho iasc^

•r QOd? le it not itoiif* in point of foot, tho fwj iaofO

oaS lii(«noso of i3ed in ttust txoMA ooia? iSnd n^t of its

ori^ni—it woo M «o mil ioMo fooadoa en t^ ^ —

t

of

&to ooia «booo om fOxm io tko Tvinlt^* im oaoh it «oaia

MiR to t« aoM ^ftn my otbor i>avt of tho ooa» laninottoly

eloee to iod, ito ooaoo* «l*t eas «o ti^ of itf Is it to oavkst

on «ai4oA otiilo »U oloo In ttio vorld %«oko oaA •pmtk%m in

«UI Ufllit «r ito FiMt Caaoo?

In ardew to onoMr thMt ^vuwtUm «o iMVO to oik «n»1^o»«

aniotl^ Hist io noeoooMiy 0*t thoto \m trao kaoolofii^ in tho

ooolT St* Aibort mgewto aa aaowor in tdiieh tltoro a«o i»or

oonAitions* First, a poooible iatoUoot obioh io j^i^arod

to reeeivoi oooondl;^, on a««nt iatolloot ^ *ita»oo li^it tho

fttetovotiott of Itio ^oooico in whieh thore is ttatb, or liiot

Page 310: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 311: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8t« AXbwt

M4

troft lAtSns* *«te«» pl«««l *l«l«Uyf «>« ret ftbj«cta m %^ ectaal

•ol^Mt of oar kwwlod^, olthcr in &tiK»lf or inttbo phMitaotat

tt Is tho ol>J«ot ooaBomins «blch *h«r« l» thmt trathj foartisljr$

tb* ipriBfllpiM aaa «9CiOM vbiob ««• •• it «oro iiatrwoato

pM3^oy%ion»UiMS pooeiUe, IsagMMMlUo oaA noeooorot? ooaipooltiono

ftiKI 41vt«lon« from which %im v«nwi U ropoivod) oil *Mmw «•

««atttl»2S0* Of ^looo fe«r vo ««a» o«y ttet Mm first to <ml7

r«»«lTing:» tho oooiied i» only sivtag Itc llgbt* tho tlilrd Is

t*»«\rine f*^«^ ^^ ai!!;«c:t iatf^oot «b mU as ^vlag the

ii#% of dlstloct trattEt to tbo ^s«d%l« tatelleot and *i»t

tho fflRdrth la mvea ea an institment «n(t is novlflg t&o soa»

position ona dlTUlon of thst in ^tolob tlior© is tbo famo

^ias lenown or soui^t.

As tlM^ stsnd tttOM ftour oonOltions aro not s\:^ioionty

la at. Albort's v*»$ *• aoeo««t for t^ knowlo4«o of Ihot

trolh ohloh is grsspaH* ^ »«asoiw So aeaus thoa nataral

troth and natttml taio»l«d^« Sat St. Alport offors additions

oiOj on ono ooiantf tho othor tiaros asty roMsia as ostablishoa,

th«7 art ^«8S«lT« sttffioiont. ?hat ono ooont is tho soeood

—tho ft^ent intolloot. In r*?afd to it, and to oak* 9» tho

dofioieno^t «o most osy that tho li#!t of tho agsnt intolloot

4000 not suffioo i>og so Iter tho ahstwotlon of «to Si»sdi«o»

Page 312: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 313: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* aXWrt

Saw thtn Is it »arfiei«Rt7 it it aeil* «affict««t mOj 1» Tirto*

•f th« i^ppliOftUan to 1b« U^ «r «Mae|E«Bt Siit«llttet 9i tli«

l^hfc «dr aa «a6r«(»t«d intdlvet «d4«}x aito kivA 0tr«Rstb«nt9 it*

fl(i« i^pUOAtlcm of this £»rtifyiag Ui^t of tfas «Bor«it«a

inteUiet nagr hM»pm in t«m «n^8« Zb 1^.6 first wr th«r« is to

t« iMtotttM A tmfotld lii^t in kaaml^imm ^h&t stats «dsts

li&m. tae agsat inteUsst tuM 4«iaed dirsetljr to it thr -—^

etstttsd lij^t sf 1394 Btasslf. 7ivA% Xi^t in thst ma^ ia tn»

InMT Ssster* ?h«rs can likswise l»e a «9nJ«noti«a with %bm

UK^t of ttie ^ivias i»t«lleet ask oo. ea ssigvXio int«liset#

Aftsy «U tiMi sool is a to«i oc m lastyiiasnt ftt i^ twneui

of the scparsttt latslli r*«ie«s aoA it is «ost natural that

ths xnteUiscaes stuiaia slA o«r amsct iatsUset ^ ths i)0««r

sf its U^t* tJltiBfttsljr* howivsr* «v««;r ti^^ of th« XatslU^sans

eoaasfl fyom "SoA end he»e« it is true to sn^ ttet sstkiagr stet*

AH.. A A,- -^^-t- ^> ^Xso«v«f is iooawi oRlass the lt#i oi:

•f th« sgsnt intsllcet* For st* Athw% the iliuainatioa 9t

ttM phaa^um tt^r «ti« l»(»n tkf^iuA Intsilltet ^r«N|{^|«ss«« Mi

illtudnation of that sam agsat IntiUset Igr «ui U^S^ sf tits

IdTljie Intellect* Ttits is not th« Illundaation vhioh 3t«

Augustfnffi ^tnctAratodd} his mm «l tmlb ilionlaAtion. :^«

Al1btrt*e is on aijstreetidn ilXaatflslisii* INIW !» as swili

hs is indoMstt to »t* A!isQstin« for ths i<lsa Imt fh.s rsesption.

Page 314: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 315: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•v«n of Ui« i(l«»* «M and* |»setU« ^ «!« innuoae* of

Airteaewft. ?^t, 4Jt» /ll»©ft mtisM *fe« «*%«Bivt to fit «tetri»e«»

Ion Into iUuadnftUon vMi. the rtdalt is mudi lest atetrftotion

l^an lllrain&tlon; !>ttt ^«t it la ttR AlMltrMtion lllqisimtion*

Himt th« nwalt of ^o otteai^toa fludon of bo tuas^ <ULir«Kg€Ht

«(HurB4» is v« haT« \imm o^mvitvim i» ^^ ^radtwl 4£ov«l.oi«»at«

W« Avo mv ttteut to »m ttet aoveamt 6t its stsith*

If thlo is the my atotraotion It doftori^oA ty at, Alb«rt

«hAt lo va tf^ said of tbst U#it of tho ii^vlns Intellsot, is

it ^ftoo? If gract is aiw «if* fwttlj? giv« ^ a»4 than this

U^t !• a gra««« aons4M|fiMsstiir i^« atotiastl^c. ^.v imnbm

ato^it (Mil;? l>i' iMMM of « «»«• «ij>«»->aMo4 to tl» light of tha

a«SBt inteUaet* I'Ho Is ao true that oven if aooMt&la^ is

is liaMtaalljr kaawi tfea sool wUl ool^ fee «ct«ail««d in rss-

paot to it laf taming to tlnat ttnoraatoA li^t* Tlmt is ^ sajr*

«fie after «a bavs ao^oirsa sotaa fen»«t«d^ it is aae«a8<ir|^» in

ovaer tl»t tha soal kaaw in aet« that this imcaraatea li^

a^da te a^pli«a« m in this sassa it is a spoeial sad a

tnms&arit illmalnrttltm 1^ a n««! .i;vaoe«

Last tMs e»c?,r''-* ,.';• 5 >--: - ( .-..rk of 5t« Allitrt'S

^a1&» latar to l>a tatokecl, 1- iv»oH to tfee ^^mtaaei meoloi^ae*

«hara »t,All>srt avldanoaa no c. . ,- or possliilo intellect le

ive of no oag^tan without a U#it illoaiiuiting tha a«^a«%

Page 316: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 317: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

It* (S. XIUWSt. iVMOt

14.7

to knwrs wltljottt It th«r« !• » sawawi^e* ^wi tt»t lt#*

«hi«2i Al4« iu- tl» pJPO<»e« »f towwtng aatwpal ol54««t» U not a

ti^»tvafvtttBa lUttsdufitloa! It 1» * nfetoral llht. It 19 iiftta»«l»

«f«n *M"f* tt*t>ly glfim !»;- no*"*, trtwaaB© it «aaJJles a* t* tE»a«

aftt«!r»l >hin^« H9W«»«», tM» llgh* In «Rtter« of fftltfe l»

^•;iU In th« SfBtlfie nsign It 1« «»« H^* of gl»»y*

^'Ct the wlsole 6r««r'

taltotw in M fMr M jjsraft* It iftl*

- ^ .11 ttot «Meii la MpaF-afidcft t» iial»ar«« KWf la «• «a«fc

M It is ftAd«a to t&o crifc^ii li#* «f «»« «i5«at tnttlltet It

1» •m>«i>-«(Kied to lt« nature. Bat la ao fasuah m «»t oaaao ec(«nt

lnteU«ot ^ tory ori^ le oaUmltted to tho Ught of QoA Mid

18 In «i« lnns« of 3od It lo mtoralljr ttaadlng la «»* mm

U#t to which It is In&olntol for Its »«l»3« eoaooqoontljf. In

^M% »«R»« It is eorroot to mtf ^a% It lo tlxed«flnltlo& of

tho vo»y mtaro of «i« ogonii totelloot at th« ii»80 of mA

to ^ tatedtttd to tho Ud^t of t^e Uvlne Illt»almtlon* 3»

tl*t ti»a,th« iigmt tetoUoot^in «• mab «t It la faunflod o»

oMl flovo fro« tho ^m m% of th« tottl «*»•« ftns l» ***•

fJrtnity It ojrt» aatarall^ to tho llijb* of at*.

8t« Alport <9ooi not wmt mgroat to «aak tt»t ho tooofeoo

at thlo point on lUiwlnAUon uhl<* \MMuro tho vory content of

Page 318: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 319: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

tiittl; ii«d» thBt this um» 00 d«»iin6tfls l« no* c(inf«rlag

Bffia»<tM«g kaem ti»% I* ^ knamXL^ V th« aiM liut It l«,

rather, pouring lt« ll^h* on <^i« on* tawwins so lAAt ho oaa

jifitiuilly know. ^*3a« l* oj^tott Ugi9n& « doaW that oar tawo-

lodj^o of «Bterlail tfete^ i« afctural ^ o^oot »Mfl» »• £*r ao

te)

fr««l^ atvon* graeo igr •»» of offloloot origin.

It is tho toaoJ^fiS of St. M)>«rt «»» that tho isaf«|«d«t

of a», hmMi kao^oOgo, Daglao f»«a ^'* i^hantaoa In «lit«ft U

oholtorod tho InteUl^lUo mt«o alrOBfijr la act. It le t«r»

BiliiatoA. fwa ti»a i>ol«t of tim of th« iocodaot, at Vm ^oolUo

intelloet. In thle i»«oo«ii« It is lUopAaatofi olthor Tag do4

or l^ tho ai^olo ti:«m^ th« 11 *it roeelYoA flfoa ao4, ^b& tho

rsoson for tiile lllvMaUatloa eoaalota la tho faet that tho ll«IA

of th« a««t Intelloet, In Itoolf, Is aaat safflclowt fiwr tho

fttetraotl(« of aU tho i^ioeiot %ar lAlsfe it i» *&* ploaooro of

tho |M»otiU« latoUoot to kaoo aU l^lago* ""^ * '- motion

oaa oal^ tako *laoo 1^ tho aUltlon *» tho ll,^.t oi' tho a^fORt

lnt*lleet of tho Aagolie or »lvin« ilguv» - ^ i^ro* 4wt ao

tho aot of tho agsnt IntoUoot w»» aalA to W tWl^lA, MMlyt

tho Ultadnation of tho pooolUo Intelloot anft tho Ul<iaiBftU<»

•f tho i?hwJta»« so also lauat «o oagr that this o«»^»-a«do4

Ulosdnatlon hifarootoo la tho oa«» w«y thro *- of tho

Page 320: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 321: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lli€r« !• «i^i« «tU«»« ti»t an AllJWt did not llrait

blMMlf, In tii« dlseustlso «if this llluainatlon, to *h« wwrk*

«« buff* Joot lnf«»tig«*«d« I* •affl««i td point o»t & tm

lastanoM la his stirlotly iMlosoplilcai witlns* t© oosTlnes

ourselTss of hlo eoestsasy «»d fidoUty to his «W4 i4«sls«

¥• rssort lit Olios to Him sitBUs of th« 11^ of tb« iom itt

li^t to offOGtlvs of «tO fofao of eorporoal thtqgt* mnrnnt^

tlM li^t of tfeo First ^^'OJSt XatsUset. Qod, IrraAlstso on

«i« liflltkt «f tM tw sifiA If It did net ths offloions^ of th«

11^ of tho s«n tn wspoct to tfeoso eov^oMai foww ooiOA

%• totally «aitlhllftt«a. It Is osetl; tljo ssuae In tfes dsnlvorso

fibleh mn le. In tfao homn nAaor gna^as* 1^«o light of 3od

Iios to shins on «:# ««•»* lnt©lloc> of iskft m*l t^t«r«l*jr sW

It in the nskliis of IM «»nlfi>ld wiifowols ond In tiso lllaiil»-

otlon of tbo pOoslWLs latoUoot, ««»• it not so ttoo atoor

M^fttti oottU h«rs a» kaowlod^ of onarthln^ ohstsootsr* ror

tklo ll«ht of Ood is iolnoA %» tM owA sad to ttio ft»«i la

^0 sool mA «iA«r ttoo sot of tttls tinetostocl U«ht tiio foiMi

•ftfo the aoa Jast as wadsv ths aot of oxtorlorlj a^jpUsA

ll^t oolon BWfo tht sl^t. JolBsA tfeos, toth to tbo fow*

sna to tho a«ottt IntoUoot, aaA thorelv llluntalag Wtb ^^

Page 322: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 323: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

3« a, «iu«r

tU)Oed «atcra iatiaftteljr inte tlw pxe«4»« of Idwvljis* 1!h« eon*

clu4ii<si ilMft «<Mld have to 1>« tNit 1ib« «»« of th« tnt«lll^^Mo

ftemB lA th« tool d«|^«Rda on «b« li^t of idM Ao^lo or Jod

fl»«ine iato liho woi* adding to tho U^t of oiur own «!{•%

lnt<Al«9t ftaA 1db«r«1qr itttMMmtlqf tlw ooso lPt«UoctHftlo of

^« fonw in th« moX* UltliRfttol;^ of oouurso* oine* tlt« ^Rg«l«

Ul«H)in« onJgr in virteM of %hm litTlat lA^t^ i% mas% tw KdA

tliftt it is tin* U.^t of %« Firet Ciiti»« «hleh le th« tfffieiftnl

•oovoo of the aet of th« «:eftt intoll^t*

£<«t OB t^tereiore coticlcfecio thut thero la n ^>er»«tnent, mrA

liizkM 8«n«ml» illtanlnfttlon ^ lAiiah th« A^^t Izxtolleot opoir*

»t«0« fht Difino hi^it is eonjfttnod to th« hnraan ooal ft»d

where 3t* ^abort o^oaJco of on «^?«nt iatftlleot «M Ito Oi»«nt.tloa

ho aMUM tiJAt tho Ugjbt of oar «»n a^gimt latoUoet lo able to

Civo ottiven&Ultf to aaterlal fntao o«i»$ to tb« lig^t it

roeeivott oltltsor from 3»& throo^ a ooparoto intelli^caaoo or

fVont Qod diroetljr* Of oo^vao, th«r« ie fttt «^«at intolloct

in am oiilch o«£i «Mtlct tIMwo ols^oota unlvoro&l* tot tn^v suro

ftlroody int«Ui«llio la «st» aiid tttoa in oa« •«»•• aalveroolo}

•na far^Mtr* Ooa*s li,^t of iatelli^?iibUltar io elMart shlnias

on than «b4 on tho InteUoet lts«jLr« (;o»Mi^fatljr« for at^

Albort ftlBotrootton mmihi ttet (^pocnUon of tho Knpat intoUoet

Page 324: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 325: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

JU c* Miller isi

vML&a tw&WB %h0 t»tartt!i In tlb* fhrnt—m iuaiv«rMl la lAMl

lt#t raAtiit«d float th« MjMurata tntAlllstaew aa^ Ami God*

In thl0 imitte it is tvM to augr tJs»t 1>Mei«»« our kaamim&t

Id due to ti^e ilXuninati^m of o«a* e|;ont intelloot Iqt 6o4

it hfto »• its oaoso otneh aior* tho ttiicrofttwt li#t of !3od

tten «ith«r thin^ tbtsio^VM ov the omatod lii^ of tho

InMn o^tnt intellect*

For thio roaoon l^o ftmtewontia ori jin of our saowlodgo

ie z»t in thlA,j8t nor io it «r«n in our o«a 8oal« It ia

in tb« Ivivina Lig^t thet sa&n ^^oro bie knowlad^ of nmt»

•rial tbin^* Tfeaa it o&n troiy 1M aaid tt*t CSe4 ia ttio

Fitat Mover in the order of kmvledsa ttteaaae He ia Ifea Firat

H»Ter in the order of beine*

nor is ttiia the tfiole ateiy* If m% Divine l»i$^t ia

re^^Laite £t>r the efflelent ftinctiDnln^ of the ai^t isteUeot

in reelect to int«llL^I>le formD ere ^se ooT\&«tsits6 to Sf^in,;

tiiat oar lcROvle%e never riaea aatove aaeh oti^eota aa are

;«iven in the phantaassa? ?h«re is no doal>t tsit that otir kntya»

100^ i>9^inB fson aca8ii>leo« Siixz «feile u.&c^ lo no reason

it mat main th«re« ttKoellent reaiwsa Ma be aMOdoaeA ttet

it ehautd not* isom intelligible, leea taftterlal and noet

intelli.<;Grit: belays atill atand oakiiotnt* the idiole realra of

Page 326: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 327: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»« 0* isill«r iMSt. Aiiwrt

B9 jrei l»««n aaeomiacErec as ob^«ota of knoorletii^* A9 th«

hmam aoal eoRoenu it««U ateat tht qftlAditlM of witsriftl

1bia«« la it* vaxldiw fetation* it lMgif« «» «»iid«v «%•««

itealfy aatt «li«n tt toa a^tisfiaa its paasiUlitiaa in t^t

Un* it fiaOa ttet it still icnova a tery anall pavtion of

atot it CMi know* %ara axa tto a%airata intalUeieaasana

tb* Firat cattM« liaa«rar» far 1 13a teaoatOjr euriotta aaal

tills aU (io«a not hi^pipce 9V«r-«ii#t« It }mg$m to arte a^aa«

itsalfj and tba first sfce^ on tlta rooa to that noVl^ kaent^

li%a ia not tut r«soted froa th« first 8t«|i on tho loaa to

tika ata^a of totaUaetual £»arf«ation*

SMth a eonattion of eouroa las^Usa tl»t oaly a oartaia

liifpa of knovladga arises from tk« phsataima* sooa thiiuai do»

pand «ti oatter for thair esl8tai»a ana* as «aU, ti c ;;c^

anAatataaging of thas la^iUaa a ralaUon to aattsr* K»iwl«<t««

of things of thla %^p^ eos^'risa trivat is tomm aa astwal

. hiioooj^* iia«ar«r» ao«a thln^ Afiipawi on aattcr fbr «iair

saiatansa tet a»t for tha oanaratanoiiQ^ of tbaii« aiMltms is

«i* rasln of MathSRCttioa. In all thasa thia^ it saam that

our knovladsa arlsaa froa phaatasaa* i%a lAtallaetaia aool*

homrrar* aaa all thiaga ateira it era a«£>a*ata gsr asaa at

Page 328: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 329: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

S, 3. KilXer ^^stm Alb«rt

fton Witter* SMtsr <i%«iia ii«i«b«r for ^tlr b«tiie

n»t tot th«l» l»lne; u»J«»«t«»e *» «mtter| and ttet la «i«

•oi^l«t« tmaon f«vr ths te)«ia«!^o or Uim ooes nat ori^lnftt*

is tt}« |llW8t«MI»

8t« Altert ««U« at t}»t th« howm InteUeet io th« first

tr«^ Of «b« U#it «r C<o<i visieh id jolii«a in o&e wajr t9 «4^ae*

anft tiaB« It 1« »co«Mii!«3r tMtk tbftt tlie tuuien intellect Ma VM«S>t*«l«.la an ifit«iitioi»l maum, of ph^oal and mtli**

oBtieal thins* •imls ^ooftufte it is ^iaott «e atseee ana tiao*

Bat it Is also me«sm.ts thiit» m ftn tango of ^^^ tbo biaani

intolloot* ooijaroto ooetiaimw oo»,» tt9m l&o ^<ly, b« * eoatftln*

ear'00 fto «« It is &UO9 of thoso hijfbor «MI mmto noUo thin^

•fcioh eoBO Ateat thro>Airb th« light of tfeo iHrst Ca<aM widi

«^i^ <i4|p4fBa in no esB«n^ial co- «Kiat«i»tioi mjr <»& omtter*

iioeh ATO tho oool Ito^f anA ^o •«^ar«to in«eili««»o««t tli«i»

c«aoe» CMt oon th«i be iMttiett to i^te eehOBgi ao the hi#i«it

(15) of

•aft aost aoUo of «U thitv^o. 'or the ssooolodgo theoo three orders

plMataene am not otd; « dottiaaat. tat are vttolljr «iiwie*o««iy*

f»oi3 tbe wty 1»iein»ing st« AXbtaet oawtfally |>w»o*ed ««6

j^lomed £i»r «ie f1ml etei?o iftiiefc «o »ro »«» $«iaf to oaiteii

hiv %i?r6» ^ !»« «aBt«(l BO eordof oaeh oleeant of Mo thoo^^t

00 Sets iUoooBoea ie imt o hftfoBDioao i;>ert in vie qyntiMMmi*

flnslo towrdo eliieh he le ooo driving* The tv«ao porpooo mA

Page 330: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 331: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8, 0, mii«r8t« n^«rt

It^tSne** tad tm itiAdi u*. &%!>«% aftlatiiia* «» «»«tola« ^

ln>^ ei«e*«a to»«i>4o «« ^wf»e%l«« of %** l»t*Uee*ttftl aoai*

In «^tr «i MC«l»ln *h»t piivM« «ia «Ba Ut m pmctmA ^ St.

Mlwrt hi«»«lf to«0, with ft i*fW lii«aeti»n of hie oUwinofttlan

«f tnt«Ueots»

It !• th« tMfMDe of at. «ib«pt tfcftt tha p«mlU« int«ll«et

«bA th« ttttifWiftl ttdeting t» «n lnt«iUi»r»l my In tht lnt«lX-

•et sM Mrmlly the Ma*. Bi« pwwlble InteUoet WeoMM tht

o%4tot kann tatwiftlanttlXy. to «© fe» «» *c.e o^«ot kxtmrn mAwim

in m isnit«S*l twUm In the inttatian which th« Intellect

tea of It. In foot £it. J^ymtt aajro tftot Ifeo wdoa of 1fe« to-

talloet ftrtt ttoo thing kaoim 1« ©o inUnato that

U »•% I»»i4t **»^ *ooo«« ano for!*Uy as In tr»« anion of

poiontv «»« «** Sitiwoo IMy «*o tisio ono in tatell«c>tt*a

%tt«s ^•y «»» ^ •*** *• *• oipoWlo of toeolvtn^ oat antt tho

1^— fMnol ]p«Pfo«%lon. And thlo l» tot tho U.^t of tfeo «g«t

intollooti It nOcw ooH|>lotol^* wAtmml Kl»t «»o ti^i^ie^orlY

00 tff ffldtorwliang to «io mvlno a#t tlvo form of tho

tline knew. Tl^tm it teiago tbo pooalUo latoUtet to aet.

QiO U#t of tho aeoat intolloet a1i«7* "iAi* V *»»• i^tl***

Zi^t ia thalr eoinon iKNrfootloti* eorrio« oa tha fo«a or aet

Page 332: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 333: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« a. mam3t* Ai%«r«

l»«h of the antv«r«»l aix! of %3w £rOOslU« tntoUeot*

8«ao« tte fo«enforo«d U^t of %h« o^wni lat^loot. In

fto «nfib «» It 1« l»th in the ^wlUe InteUeet and vl^ln that

vhieh is ioiom tty tho poaailtie Intel!eot« is to te rogMCded in

too O0370* It io» firot of ftll« thot % vliieh eoMOthic« UIsnooiu fltnd aeeoaH^t it Is ttwt ligr «bi«tfi oonethias; tonowia miMH

(18 i

IjT* the oool ^tfOQgtk toe ^aralUio end tM i^Mmt int«ll«3t*

Out of thio eoBMto vhftt St* £llM»rt eheooes to cell ^o intellectgo

fwnoUo* «o oi^t define it tgr oojrinir tltat it is the li^iht of

tfeo oice»t intellect m so «w ee it iniOrae teth «io j^oootUo

intelleot »M tho iittelUstiUo foro* Xt Is si*^!^ tho li#it

of tuo octal isloUoet ia tho imtttim of infointos Votl^ t)^

poosiUe intoUeot oaA tho intelti^tle*

tftMter the XU^ of tho a^ioat intoUeot the IntclligiHe in

oot ^oeemoo e oaiveroAU l*lkootse tsofier its li -^^^ ^* f^ossiUo

intelleot is illontMd os Iqt Its eot* simltouf ?^e univcr-

oel nsves into Its neo h»ae» the illar ^ssiUe intelleot

oail ibo ^oosiUe inteUeot tgr these tf- » It thoo broa^t

ftoa potone; to aot* It hso teeotao vhst is csllod Iv St* ^hnt

«ie intelleetw in effeeta* It htm initisil? then tflosipsted

j^MTt of its snivorsftl potenoyi it is in pot«MjP to all intolliiir

iiaeo* The more it is rendered in aot 'coa it is in pot

(ao)

and tho tasrO porfoot it %000MO0« fho inttaiogtos in oi;foettt

Page 334: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 335: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

U th« int«UiglUe in Ite «eta&l taiMneUti^ 1& th« tn*<»llttet,

90«8iUe iattillMt M aetOftliMd Iqr tetti «bMi &s«fit iatiOLlMt

v^biB liie iRtai«»t is v«a3«v«& in 00% tlm laHUoc^ia

oylytei^iorBia feri,«<ft»« Oaew tfM» %weo tnvoivccli in tiMS pri»oij»l«t

wttt ia»«a ttie iirt<AXeotttO ^yiiwijiot-^i:^ ic .^f^o.-n'^., J. v-,j «r|tli

«ii« prinel^M at« tte insiwittiBtt iKg ^iM»h kVNdud^ of thingss

i» fi«3HlTeA fro?!! «b« ^imMi]^l«a« For '*«• Aii»nrt laiOQr euMi tK«

(Si)

1» M f« « «• iDMnr tltito tfltni* ^>h«t these

illofnituid astiA isktliMt ««itiiitM« Id «4iie« the ^8SiU« ii>»

ttiilQot tiom potcaojT %o a aey» p«rf«et <S«^«« of aottuOit;*

BMaii»« of %h« 41v«f»« ifiitaBBoes «^eh h« dUowed hiiaecslf

to laidioi^ \bm noxt oiip iU om of Vbm mm^ intricate is st*

t*a o:iQ>l«afttlon af t^ tsftseH to tntaUootara porfaotiea*

vii%, i»«igtoiiia«r i« MUttsod )jp « 8i#^fie«At pl^e of fidelitjr

to Avonro«8» «iti& ttuMi {»t» Ait«rt fiMa hieMBwlt in h»j^

•gVOMMBft* tttt for a TO^ fov polnta* ^rorroeet <^J.eag «lth

alaoot oil tt\€ other i.hil(»ao^^iiero holt's for an :,;c:it, Intalleet

«liioh io aiiswirfito and m^ a i^oM ho «oU

kaoTO ttkat aimo tho ««o»t iittoUi^ionv -. „ 40 tiw .,^ _.

Page 336: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 337: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

I* 0* xiUfv157

(38)

MDttAMIM* «h«»t mUrti ^ « MOM or «Mlt OOfl^liQOtion*

m i»gm% noi » ^9Mll>l« i&teU«et la th« aool* v . .-.. >^^t

a«vw doal^td for <m» tOmU %im% tb« M»fl* lti«i^«et i« « i<«r«

tfiA IMWfr or til* lum» MtiU It lo Aim9» lotaod m « jMurt«

Sa«, oad tblo is ii«Mt«it, tbo U^ cr ihM mg^^^ ^^^^* i«

ito ftot, lo mt «l«^ ^to«d in aetu to tho pooslbfto Intollost

rot It 18 not al«ft3r» wMm ^« onlT«i»ao to *• la tho syw****

mtolloot. In thl« ««nit tbo osont iirtoUwt it tiswrftto*

n>i« 1« ft y«MA»U^ Admit telot« i^r now «• tmw ^o^^A i^

tigmt Intelloct to ft i?o»ltioa wh«r« it la alraoat «t tbo lofty

par to which tho ftgwit iatftlloct of AT«ru ^, ' -"

fttoat which ti»t £iwUan*a «or4» hsw l^oe- «• In point

of tae%, '^U Alhttt Itao gooo fto for to j off on

tho OMO fttot «itk Avonooo *• hio Ooc-iiK v?iU '" '-^

to ««»•• So 0«l «jy tfe»% the Uj^it Of His at^ent intellect is

not elwftyo Joined in act; then the agent i ^ct is more

O^VftVAtO timOk tho pOOOlWLO inteU«et« It is precisely from

«I4>0 point on that It le no Irnvsor ft qtMotlon of «toftt 3t# a)»«r%

it going to tako fx»« Aforrooo tet onlyt ot vbftt point is bo

Page 338: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 339: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8%« ^\mt rocttfitwt «!*« in twh « 9UU of affttlM h«

to* had lwt%«r look atottsift fw o ooaoe of ooajoaott^i i«toreliBr

«he o^ont ifltoUoet is ioinoa fOTnoUy to tho pooolUo lat«ll«et«

tel «i»t l0 it to )Mi JoieaoA fotsBOld'? In his mm«t s%« Albnrt

odopto tm polntfl Aroa AlftntoU* tohieh at m ifttall sot, ho

eoold ooil liAV* road* snfi no 4om%% tfid roofd* in ^verrooo* Hb^

tatoiloat hoo too opoi»tlami fiirst» to mk* tho Intolloeta Iqgr

4o»ifilti«( thorn tvm aatter, ooeo»sij» to caifiorotimd thooe fonao*

9tm firat is pvo^er to tbo OigpORt inteli«et alon«, «hllo tho

9mmA %tm iioaoitto tabolliet oa^o i& aaasfOM^ «i^ t^^Cir

iMoaito poooro* 3o fa» oo soo4| lra.t «o ahould aU kiuw ttot

tho oooajmnoo oaA ooeavity WT oi^acko i^loooj^ting io sot

to tio ioiaad to tfeo 9gm% tntilioot oiOjr oo to ea offioloat

eaooo in Hso oMor of knooiocl^i tet aiao to %o tiait^d to it

ae to a fona. ?%o oi^laaation A>f thio ia ois^lj that «iio«

tMi a^«tt intolloot pvoAMieo tho univotoalo in the ed?^ it

.

Ao«i 00 oithout tho holp of tho pomiUo intoilooti ia t^ia

ooaao it ia ^iaod oaijr m offtojono* Hooovov* tho oooond

99«9tAt^n, iMuniX^, JMolli^yo io lot oo iado^onaoat %o%

»0«air«8 tho asrent intoUoct joinodl at efficiotte. ?C9v fhen

if tho aaeaitty of tho ha,

hia intolloot ho iointA to

Page 340: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 341: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9U n'Htt

f«^ioDftU0 knows hlin«lf aad th« agtet i{il«l|«et« %• fox« i»

it i« tlM p«trwtioti of th&t ^ vhioh it !• Joined at a f^ni*

S» it it th« «i«!«Rt intelitet »• fot« ttiao^e^ tbitlk Mn dttv tbtt

vtvic vft^oh i»hisin«oflur««li«i0« sna* Mi iMtt is ttet

sorkt it is ))&' ystiisiitf th« ^t«iiliAllti<w of on««s ka»«t«a««(as)

ts kasv snsMif vA m* thixtm atef* oaMslf*

Xt vsmid w vsllt ^)t<w« m i^mH wmm Hm ta sash a

tssehias^ to fiaft oat vhafthat or aot it is iHSMal;^ possililo

fay as» to attain to « coajonotion «iti» his s^sat int«lloot«

aot as offiai«a vU^h is aisoys ths oaso* iMit as iS»m mUk

is a»t aias^ so joiastl, ^<ll oas hsa to tfo ia ofdst ta son*

vinee aiasolf ttet it is osrtaialy potsi1»l« is asraljr to look

oround* "• sos tita owiis «f thoso hopsf saas «hos« soiao

»€ p«rfoetoa aoeovdlB^r to ttia MffMat afeato or « la

tkiir stato it is qaito »»ymfm» tbat tiajr t^ i mt^y tha

knoaloO^ of diiviaa thii^ a^ek Cod BiMsU

affoots art «aa«iii to psata tbaft Ifea wa^aaot

iatoUoet to the agoat iatolloot s« to a fom is aatuia.ljr lunra

ia this lifo« Bsnoa «a ays aot reactd moonj it is

yaasikta ia tMo iiTa*

3inoo it oaa tM aons« tho «MStioa ae« ia kav Is it <ton«f

Page 342: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 343: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

s« a* KtU«r160

la the «•«»« i«d «9fi« of -ttiia MiiJaMttm s*. Al*«r% iitfotat

tlM Mqateitton of SiJecalaUw \em<Amm to **« «»78* ^"^

•f all, etrtaln ai^feiilfittv® teBWl«a«« l»«9.»«as in u «» it •«»•

^ iMitia»M> V« OMA no t«aoh«r« nor m& Inqtiioitiotu

tMJiso MO tho rtrot i?*laelpl«o «na i>»oi>«» «lo«o Jfetlo*

iMoh wo know iwMdtatoljr tn ao f«r «• «o know tfeoi* tew»»

2»«otf»si^» othor opoottlAtlv« km i)«roa«»t to sm»

9Kn <^tooolx«t •• o^ttl^o »ft«t It b • *^l dlsoowry aa^ ^,

Uttttiias to too^oto* In ao oruAi «o it i» volontMry aosfoiio,

oliaioat iitiy«le«tl or neetal iiis^o&iaOBtiit wm <!o it if he M

tiMoooo* Xn tet^. 9t «>ee« ooimhi «U l^to iaio»lod«o oomo If

iroMon of tho ili«»iiiti6 o««at intolloiat yoitfta^ ^ortb in*

tolioetaolity onA M tmkisne ^* osArmstau OMv&otoijr In «o^

a« «jg«it inloUoct 00 iaum i» eirriciosaoi **t t* to booaalag

jftitwa ao forau Shroo^v* all thoao ot^o tho poooiblo

toteUoet ia eontinaally rooalting tha li«^t of «iO a««t

iBtelloo* anA day tgr <^ to a»««l»i^ i»»o taio«4o<LiTO \qf

awana af the ft?^'isnt intoUoot* dlfttoM.* ii^tiewaa, At***®***

In «ict all tnc yaUoooii^hora, an^ that tfela la to %o «»v«a

to a oontJawtion and ooajtinottoti »i^ tho a«ont intOllaet*

fh«n *hon <*)0 poasitto InteUacft haa tm^ir«A ell knowlOJlo^

paaaihla to it an that roala i^'

'^^>^-.,

Page 344: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 345: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St« Albert

aAllec:!. ^t l&ftt poiat It h6S tl'*^ ll^t ;«st lnt«U-

«ot t > lt»«lf at • t^mt »» Its i^wr«ctloa# ^m

the armt InteUect Is mt «nly Joittsd to It a» •fftclano.

tet ^ea It 1« a© l«ng«r Ottt«l<l«s It tej^ It lo no Im^m

M{9Miit« vrcn la t^«t vtt^^i ttt* itf*!^ iat«Uttot la* ftt tliftt

l>rwtJis wnuiti |>«pr«tl5? Joia«d *• tH* i»»»lW« lateXletft

a* r«rtt* ^m* r««ilt so i^a«e«4 aafl. canpftwA is oftll«A th«

ftat »t. iilb«rt »«5iMt ia thisi «*.« pwialM* la%Attii

1« ei^ia« 0i becoiatnei <iU tfeiagt lijr isno^tiag th«i| tlw e^fiBt

Intelleet o«n «»»ht<m dLl ttixum f» that «if p©«»iM« lateU«dt

w»y m«%mXl9 krm thiH. —.- -c «ig«t InteUcct Ic .'.olmA t«

tiM p^wlUft l«xt«U«»t in AOt, tbft* t«, «J»«R It 1 ^ iJ

pvoda«iiis tbt tntellttettt^ It is «fri9i«nt of t

ttnd t« tb« «xt«»t tbftt it la «fflOle«t ifce poi

1« hetln^ ita pi»t«nei«t •etoAUtaAt It, |nr

t#llectua fa9twtli»» intf liecti^ in 9ttt^ ,..._,

-ri-u-' lor .;.->• ">

^" •'^'* Ail»»t «6.^e. Its etw^

p«t«»^ 18 41.' antt • *tMe df T' ^

•laaltaAOCi - >jfact«A» Obo<:- t^ It is

tn cn't)Ctu only in »«»tf©«t to tl»* petti" '^" ;-3'i0..i__.v,3

it utlU n <J« Itaalf in |>ot«fioj? to «U th« »«»t v c>c3

not y«t kn»w« It ia )mI»s partaetaftj it ia atill L

Page 346: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 347: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* Alte;t

Itt

!«• foU pwf«pn<Mi« ^e fijsent in««U«ct, elm^t an Intrinale

^m tt U to^Mta •» ffialMWN »a* It t» ttlU d^pM*** ^»«»

it i« not M in oot** mntmtt «a It eontiswoo t« p«rf«et tho

pouibl* intoUoet tuoro lo l«oo ji^eoolUUtar ot ita e«in» «o

Mputtto* tar it io novo oaA aoro in «ota# fho 4«gr«0 of pex»

tmHua of tho poooiWo intoXloct lo, tbotofwro^ la ^irm%

9«^ortioa to tho dogroo of o^goiotOHOOO of «iO ft«Mt% tetiAloot,

mo MTO It lo ^liiod to ttoo i^OOOlMO felttl 1 /xot, the lo«»

•ffovoto It i« owl «»o «o«o oloool:^ 4o*fc - ^ooaltelo int^lloet

api«9««i 90ffoetiOA* l!tet sKWfootton Ao to kovo oil Its p^t*

«wtoo la that o»tfor of fcoooloOgoo ootoftliooA* »« t&oro lo

Mtlktxv twtVb» in roopoet to oldeh ttiOiO^osstt latoUoot Iwo

mt Um laoottt It om thon no Umgw T»o oopow* ^ "

intflloet hoo thoa ootoivoA oil %i.* tntellect. ,

flot is r^ leo^tr 0€|»i»t«, It lo tbo p«rfootlon of tbo ^oeolHo

totoUoot oaA tee wnoanooA Ito oo&amto ot«t«* owlWo

IntoUoet hao ^«a jolnoA to it oo to its porfootloa or Ito

tmm 311100 tho twa lo that #rlasi|4o tluroo^ v^leh o^rthlag;

•OMLofOO oliftt It ttiocas ael^ovet oafi oIiiov « 't^lo intoUoet

hM ooon «ll ito ootoncioo oo^ullooa Intelleet,

«M pooaitto IttteliecB can rt^tlj^ *0 tut*^ W wv .j^»*.><-- -y thO

Page 348: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 349: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

^» G« miliar XS9

int«Ueet n»t (mXy «s «« ah tittUAmm iMt «l«d m t« lie

19 t«r .«! ti« ^^y,^, ,m»^f i* *•

«

^^ «*• i«***^-

liMt «eq«it&tl9» af «&•*• 1«a« and jpffo«>«ir ialK41«e%^ as It iMur««

ties)

l^c tttllitgr mi& frjctt af a8«*s X«k1»i«r9« 'Sbm man is in a i^oattion

thta 18 th« «orlc vfelc , amnKeUt

Had to taa6«rtte&d 9K •"At* froa^ jtgM*

'

<Bitl»ai|iy

In wmmry it een 1>« tal^ intelX«ot Is joise^

1« tltr«« vagrst aRtt»r«l.ljr» in sst of t^

ootiif «fnoi«sti;» i'^ "''. .- .. .. .- —.,.<!« »p<oi4ft:fc»_

««S fi»rr«ill;^« In: 00 Cttw m »ui io mm ^oarfeet to do tho aivlrje

wrk vhleh it 1« his j^ottoetloa to <bNi '^i« afuuK» of Iti

Jwiotlon at fi>aMi to tho latelHtHSttio iB^oOttlfttifttt - -.~o

proftodoo \i\ t«il»ot i^jreroof^^o v^

imtclleotA? e 0|»iealfttiir« lnt«^l- j not dittlaiEaieb*

od fiom tho i?08siU« lifttolXoet cm tiio 8l«^ <i:. .... ^.w^J^ot but

fxoR th« oido of pottne^f . isslblo lo in jN^tooB^t the

epottulfttlve is in ^roti h«i»: ar de^::

^' ^ oositlo int«U«et tlMit onotbov intoiloot* %« tMijr » >

Page 350: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 351: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&%0 aiJirt

with St. n\ivr% «»t %h» ln^»U««%ui fofwftltg Is 41vi&td ix^

til* 9f««ti««l «»& •^•OiOAtlvt lnt«ll««%, •• «bft% %h« ^«ealtt«lv€

liilttllcet U 6 psirt 0f tti« fi»nMi iii*«U.««t» spec -low-

(SI)

|«6g« p«ur«l7 for %t^« Mk« »£' )cr)0«l«aim« Thos t* Al%«rt

•ayt ttet th« •i>«&tatE%lipe tnt«Al«et Is XM efta«« af %im oox»*

JVMttea vf tb« Aieent tnt*ll«et m fom Im mmm «»« I9 th«

p*oey«ft«lv« M^alsltloii «f »|;»«t«ilimf« iOMmlMl^* in thtt Him

•f thtt a^mt lnt«ll«et tut |>«»f»e«tdn it r«Mftti «ii«r«in tii«

9M«iU« intHleet i» •B%B»ita«a foily «ti« It is eoaj«tii«a t«

^bM ftftnt intellect m i«« p«rr«eti«n 9r £»»•

li«Mff« p«eeM&iii« ittth tlw «MtfifM tf 9«« ^Mrt It t«

i99tepri&t9 *t this polot to lnfMti€«%« ti^ &»ut««t df sneh

• OMtrinA* AlfftraH hwl mi4 tb&t tt»» at^mt iaMllm% mmi

lass Uet s«{«aFftte Intelli^^sBce*

BtwlAl fMnns it plMss thm in o»ir i;

ttm pvUmjf ts eet, «h«i 9&* has sll or 4^~— — ,- ——

tgfps of forms th«n «ns oiir slsmto onossif to tho ia^^looHAa

of poro tntolll^hlo forao wMoh ww nwrer in ORttor. Ikfljr

hosoM fsras £»r oar int«ll«»t oaA 00 toosivod fvoi* ^o o««n»

intolli^wMO ottr Intollect U Joiaod to 1 it Itsolf and

tho forms ia it sat oar IntoUoets are our Intell*

r--^ his is tho ijatollootos Bd«>t»S»

Page 352: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 353: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K, 9. XtllWl«0

^v ';., bwerer, that not «nljf ' InteU-

Igiae* M^avftte M% tl>«* » «it«rtftl (j><»aiitW«) lnt«ll«»t w«a»

aso »^«*ai^ fttrtfew. •wsa *«« •fewaftl »aA oiw la ai wai.

«a to mmH «Ba «urott^ c«»tta«»«Km »a«l o»a4««itt«» «!**» **»•

f»««t. Im»^«rtH>ilg in «»« ••a Of •«* «»». «»% »#al 10 tht

font of ti« bofiy ©f «8«b "Ml *« » primi^f of *h» ••nsatit*

«bA M0ttetlV« Uff, MSS, « « ««%«1«1 f»^l« l«t4rtamtflA

I,; Miter » ti»t «fe«h sua ls«» W» e«s seal* ^* *«>* ** ^*

mttrUX tRt«ll«sot Jol»«l *« tb« «^at iateUi3«»B« ago. iSm

«h« «««it to vmt Of thl« titWiitioR AT^rroea sejos ^.^^^^ ?fflt

<i^fftclU« ?ht weterUl tntcUoot U iOla»« tfcr«i^ *h« «"*

l^rtnelylto «a4 «ie rwtdnm »j«s*l»tlirc Jci^- ... -i^, ^s «8««

thlo or that «Mi»o •fttorlftl lftt«ll«et tg? i«i ^^io

infilTWoal aatwia fom tho mterlftl tnt«ll ^4«»*

of the •i^ulotlw kxrmlta^ifm oi tulo or tbot ma, oMcfe know*

Page 354: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 355: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

> * G* UXlUx IH

eonteet of Vu9 m.UaeiAl InteUeet vltb tdtui fons or aaol la

is tflleiaEit of wftteriel a» 9«U «• alwtv&et £oxim in «b« mtwial int6U«et exU! It ie Joined to the witsrifil Intelleot t»;n» ifjii

1^ inteXiootei sooeaJLatifiUi idi tbtt tmttatiff,! Intclioct Is fia-oocjbt

oftf* AiKl (sorA in 80t t^c^a^ ^« Nooption froa tho ngoat ia»

tollect of «Mi »£»«Q|attvo kmvloO^^ %i» n^iat intolloct Ut

4oi»od M cisittt o»a imtmuitii^ •» for^ ^luui ve a»o Roved to

A co&tiavtatlan or oonjtinotlon to tlto aigont lnt«Ii«ct eauA t^o

Mittoaa is mis oo%l«t«6 witii tho aotiuaimtioa of onoti a«i*o

yiouliar pot«BOt««| at that ^iat «ho mtort&l Intel loot is Joia*

«d not mily aai to aa a^ront bat alao a.s to a fOm» its p«rfeeti«Ei«

in Uii0 sta'-.v liao tis^o ftguctB^or 6t&t« o.' .rt c irit;; and asauranoe*

m for i^«rro«« the mstorlal intellect io tho aii)»4«et sot

oni^- of the lnt«Uacta ei>acalativp "but alao of tha .,.,^ . Xntalloet*

itie intellect in a«t in eag mm io the

•poonlativo kssowloOgoa aad m§ agont iiiteUeet« la thia aenoo

t^o a#iBt intaUeot ia oonjotaad vittv mutk mc- ^-."'—--^ '^ q aois*

tiimation of %h» lotallaota agacid£' lya. mt i&teli«ct

aa tha i>etfoetion ia aa tlto font of ti>

wiaao we j^arfocm ova j^rojKEif <

Page 356: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 357: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

it is n«omtmxs iim.% it to « foym in ae« ^us «e ejn» lilc«fi«»

(35)•a to Ood in thle tliAt «« aiv all MUigv* l>at in ka»vl«a^«

L«t on i^iHUM ft oMMftt* for «• nitnoss OH oco)st>res»o so

M0iitAV tJiftt it SMM ft eocMKiiplfte* to aootion it* H«ro io ft

am fbr whoa proeooii^ tbii^«ro huA providoa forttlo aftlNnriai

for a dootrint itii^ «eo t«miiM>10'^ie»ll>' olr-iLnr to ell aims yot

•troAi'toSttllj' tmlike «^c,' ., • t, -J-be. t; ax. this joints ianew i idl

««11 tiiftt the ag«»t intoll«ot of ^Torroeci ^ enc ono

fior fill mcni h« knew tho fMUM of Alf&rabl -

• no

kMo M ««ll Ituit tho notorial intellect of . vwrroeo wa oi^

•Vftto and imiquo aafi tbat it doaied iNMraoiial l^nnnrtBlity* f^ti>ear

bo mo aweyo Ibftt St* ^ a<;u0tino lutd tmi«|kt that tho Inaor Motor

ooe Hlo XiTlno tSO(U Bftt ^ dofining tilo ooul eo ho did, Igr

oijplAlalnjf ito BBtftro aa ho di4» th&t soul Immmmo «<^Ue of

•«|ppiHrtia«; on amtat Intolloet vhioh tRao aftor tho tmm»t of

A Pfttor '•oraerggt, illotslaoo fegr tho Xnaor Maotor* In %^ prooeos

of atetraetton arKl llloninatlon,

^m. «ui ono hand t^oro lo aa An^slofi inaortollty in Qio

Oftton «lth tho loot eopareto intelligttaoo aoA an IntellectgiO

i4ife»^tfn on ^e othor tend hero la a Oirlotir Me of

aooiailftting: the vary «eU«4ii>rin^ of eueh C a

eohorttfti tooohioig of hla own motaldin^* aot roeeh*

Page 358: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 359: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St. Allwrt

•A tiw «NWii»iaiilon{ V0 tMuit go a UttU father vltb &U ^ftllteirt*

likll« «h«re «im ^ ltttl« (l«a1>t Iwl that iV«Tff»«B ift 1;h«

dlr«et Im^iration «f £>tft AllMHrt «n ttitii point, trni^meUHXy

sitie* h« t«ll9 us 90 hloBtif* «« ««»% lt8%«i «t he m^lMina to

ao tho firot tjTjpt of this dtvuie tszuvieo^;^* made pooslHo is

ittio lnt<>IAoc1ftMi o<ti^iiiia» la tMo oonOttion tbe ooal k»o«»

Itself mv& its a,f;<ttrit IntaUeot. It te» ^asaae aU Ibiii^ It

kaowot itot it itnovo aa& i1m^£ euro ono« Ao it e<mtii8ioo to

opceoto tntoUoetaallijr etlnat «b«eo thlqgo it icnotifo itiolf ea

oontaSsiiis tMo oatf It iMUging to snov ito^f in ttooQlf• rmatf-

tmm airo otmoeoooozsri in o»l«r tfecit tho i^totloot )£nsm itoiOf

It anat >»o fl«t!E»UftOii oaa os^oiro itooif* m«n it is £l»r its*

oolf on olftjeet of kaamlod^EO* if 1^9 io t^«e riiavielft for o

j>hilooo^«r it io Idee ifaxoU ooid tlmt tbe oool io pixt

in o %«4jr tlstftt it flMjT 4i0oiiiror m& know itoolf*

lato oaui thdo oietiiiroo toA kaooo itoolfi its tamAti&8B of

oolf fyi^wfSm i^^ Its QBion to ^»o ^gmA igxMXm% oo to it*

fonw Bat «»or« io otiU te U oot ftrtln ito poMiiao nol»l«r

k3Q»9lod^;oo« ^«ro is no loo it| it io i»o«&ns itoiHf

oni ^ ito o«if«ooat«:i juI rooliaer itmm iNMUilyr*

It r««Uo«o ito aiasot di»lno 1»o»tjr «»»i 1» «»«» <»^* **»

^SMty io art f»oo Itoolf^ AHA too thooo om ooro Wwttlful

Page 360: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 361: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

thing* ftnd n»r« aivln« «Mn«^« CeoaetMfl of thi* th« aeul tmxm

tivMda th« Iat«Ui@«neM «»d wMsfiil* itMlf «e « oNioa witli

«h» light or %fe«o« o^i^Acmto intoUUaoe^o Meoaling )gr A9gnm

twm iml&n idtit tho Uot int«UI«{in&« to tho hi^ooi qnftU It

ft«e«nde ev«n to ft miioa vlth tte li|^ of ttw tlTtne Xntolleot,

It ie tb« lnteIX^.%ta feaglaUatlmo In irtileh rwn. In 00

fftf M to j^oir«il>U or isooMoaioos for Mb B«rs«« iig^ot^ to tbo

Xlviiio lotoUoct ii»ieh to «M U^j^ aiut oftoso of all thlo^*

nvtin^ fttt^and. i«06lf Haft tbt Il|^ of ita iL:joat intellect

th« oool o«a ne« osKtottA ttoolf, tbao paatlfitA trm ito boAjr

to tbo li^t of t»iO AafifOla^ ooomdlns tteov^^ then s»0£!r«»siT«l^

to th« otavUoitjT of tbfi ^Ivlno IistoUoet* Fxoa tht li|^ of

tto mm. mgmx 1nt«ll«ot it proooote to tho li#it of tho

(39)Int«lll«»oo«o ana fMn tJMro to n» Zatolloet of (Sod*

Sb«t ocnrt of aet l« ^lag «r boro «o ooar «<01 ook at*

Albort? Ati« IM hao oXfoi^ir oaMOVOd that It le tiiO act vhioh

OOd do««, muaA;^, to o»al«^p|«Ni ttWilf aaH to leaiv •4|?asnto

iatolll«ine«o* thn ootttoi%>laam of oolf is laid in tho

tntolUetqo od^ttto. It is la thi tntolioet»iO fto»i<tUattyuo

t}^t %m acmX roe«iv«9« throng ito itnioa uith thoir lU^A,

a kaovloa^ of tho Xntolllaonooo* Sho toooon for thio otan&o

in «Hi faet that tho hmmm oonl* t^ iaoftifta tho o«i^«riov U«ht

Page 362: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 363: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

SU Alb«rtX70

r«eepti<}Q of oon aoUe ismvled ^ B^netrar, it Is ti^^oMlUe

t99 «h« sool to «tetr«i«« this i£m«l«d.:i« Am t&« tttiwiblo mrld:

avi^tr een i% «on«tvu«t mush mtiotm ia itsOf* It rtmim

thm ttot to «lwi«v^ OM of tlie outporior lTttelIl<?«nftea tlit aeol

i.:,..., o-iO to b«? jotnf^ At this or ^ft aoram^ it ri— U: a^r? tj-^t

M «a irt«|ii€*«io« it to ^MntlfttUjr r%>lot« »lth ia^tvUiiiUo

vaitmmX farm* For it ie th« vojry dcflaitlon of «n Xntollisomo(40)

t» W ftai of £9fm» FfM tho onUaneUon of tn« soul aaH %htA

lii^t of «h« Xiii%«UI.|N>M« tbfere ftov into tsw Iiswhr soul fwnt

f«A i&o«ioo of ttmt ordor to vbtoii tiao yovtloidaY XittoUtsmeo

Hiwigta Omto lo hammw « eonilti»n of reeo^ttoni ^9 tmmtlttw i^&eod ia th« ooid w voooivod tb«ro *ooor<Sinf? to «)o ^ov^

•f roe^tion 9t %ho r«o&j4«Bt« mt miXf avo «&% voooiYod ia*

tostioaoti;? tet tljag euro roeoivoA oaootdiaer *• tfeo laJlvldaal(41)

«^tit«id«o of tliooo roeoiYi r^

2t, Aibort pvooo«&« *iui:a this ^ dototntalas ^sat tTiO

intelloot MCtondlR^ itaolf fiado ^« ii^t of tho Xatolli^oasot

¥nxT^9iw yroooRt* Br -•'--. itooif to tho lii^it it is i^fsvaod oad iaftitod vitfe it aad eioHfiod to Keavonl; iMaut;^-,

In this iN^f «)« sotas Of tho omro oxeoXlcnt mm oaoont^ooo fior

aaro thaa thoir owi tedioo* Far thoir ooaio aro in i«j8«eosioa

Page 364: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 365: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Of fiMiM a»r« nBtT«NMd In ttmp^ ttma li^o«« «lMiir£»t«id ftott

jplMBHi'lMMN int in kaamtn^ l^cve fariM it f- ^^Mtthtog of

th« Int«lil;j«ne« % viuMi idi«i? ««rc lM9li9«eOL« .nt«ni^fl«to«

l»9«9 l«««lf iHBr mum ^tma^^m^ asA «iiu)« it i« i^ definition

fail 9f t^frmp vtMii lauMW Ibimt &rt kmnsi in lsli# jtosuai anKal

it «Mi b« 8«ia that th« noal h«» a ••rtfil^ ao-nttion af ^«

It t8 mt tiU Ai)Mnrt*8 intmUaa to ttop }»»«• m# in*

teli^tt Hism «t«Bs:tfe«»«A HtM throojli th« oiA«r» of ^«

Iittelliginie^ to V « riviat U.^t« f« ooa

to^Eiioallj tignif; ,_ *ihe s^mat i«tellect?i» oaneti^

or fa|tclleetuiB <U7laus» it io not «. om ematm »t %te »mi«^%itm «f

tM iatelloet bat oseO^ ft oortaia laoSt of i^rortt; of th lleet«

ohoaJia ORO 4oitif« to kmm ^« iiM«o 9t ffittfOnii^. —^ ....,,. ^^

of j;,'«urit;^ :it« i^i^ort oota l^riHi four A>'UMi^ r :*mK6>»%

th« oontoiq^iation of iw&alisr* tho ooftiioitioa of gro»t«r luofi oom

pcofoand iIl(»iaAtioB« vo^arotloii li«« Ifto obJ«ete of «g«oo antt

tiaos end the persistr lio&tion «ith the li^t of t&o

masf«tlov oi^ere of ^otogb In the etteinaent of tho fotwth eatt

iMt i««Eina» end in it« oontimiiU posooooian* etnado Hm Id^Mwt

£«rfeotion «iiich etm tMj;>«;on t0 mn in ttUe iife* ;^ ai)mv%

iaoiato that it eoMO okoo* oofo coA «i»« _ - . -jjX i» p«r»

Page 366: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 367: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«• 3* iau«r in

(48)

ml {a07« fron «tie Fir»t Caom*

St, Al%«rl WM ft« eonfl4«nt tr^at 6U mn Mold atteia «hi«

«id is this litm ft« h« VM ttet a»t aragr ^ «ttain it* >^^

•IF« fatfiaerea ly siignittftl wiflMntel UI0 «!iloli inc^^etitfi'tt

t?s«Bs, tt> ^!j« «te<> •Ohtovi} lew inltell<8ctttii «4.<»i^taai|,

m99 «t«Mi^mA is ttte a«gre« tmat taiSF vi»« » ^iii fel^Mur* t,

^%«rt l9 pr^anA to offer » MiilxraUaa in ttMi gottmr

9t tte lnt«ll«et«> ft98t«dlfttiTO» tribieb is a MMf** "^-'^^

mll4d tb« intallcctao gaaotua* C«rta4a «<n ore -^o a::iiVx. ':: -t

t&iy v«««iT« t2k« «£>ti%tid« ito diaoovw %h« attMil* t«rn in s^. Uo riu-

wIl^MMit atn? doe%ylnift< tn so «aiil? di«Mir«riiis th« «d^i« i«m

«it« hft0 imawjaw tfeia a^ti«^« aati aa vaU te tamed eal>tilita^

ailartia ia ttis per^Mt a^titoda to ae<]tttira laamtwm aAMt%

%mm imotaiataij'* in ^<At infaUiUa azear en& latokl'^' <^n^

tktvitaticHw La«tljr« thara taemiaa tita hi .^.est »tat« ar tha

toaa» int<&lleet id:«rein it ie rjosaadacd af tdia a^ftitatia ta

kaiw fatar* thl «r«ly frat»a»tl|r

to aff«et j;yra^«Gi<»« Za aiqy fr% «t tha aast

^a«at«d otat« af ^a iatellact, >» i^t« Ail^art

telle a»9 ta« iaUtlttttae ms^%--j^, ' "' f lat«lll«ii.l«a flaw

into tiic auul fKMi thaegent intelli|^«aece« the iUi^le* of fron

(40)

tha nvflt Agent IiitalU«tnee# 9o<i BiMelf.

fi

Page 368: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 369: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

5f Alt>«rt

ITB

1»« Uttm wtot U the (^mkA ttvot ftf th«M V^«s of

laM«l«da<w7 1%» j^«pfM%i<m •t «»« IcteUittt in this life is

ibe effeet* Wh«n mm Immui intelleet le raieeil te the avine

H^^« Mt nam ititing onljr Atetfeetive iUoninatian 1>at the

eeotent of kB0«le(3#e ef thingii divine ^e ilioadaation ie «e

geneml thet mn is »bw>latel^ |>avtned fteei hie IxMljr* Mpftttieipittee •otaeirtiBt of dlvlni^ 19 «esr of rescmblfiRet'.

1^1^ peeeeeeed of tti4t i;: -:.: -:nt»

t«apUte tfaeee t.hii^ end xt. m«n Icee fi»fttimt«

^^en hiaeeXf* Conoidet iMV ifiek and futile are thosettioee

intelleete ew not eOgg^Sct* Alliert aatte uai » ' ^ g

of diTioe eontengilfttiye thinm aaA th^ vn&^at.

than tlie 'beaeta of the fiel4 «;. 2 -;a retmin ia the *fnaK9>*

(47)

led^ of aing^ars. of raan in ao fa»

ae he ia mm is to *^At ore »ei^

orate* In ao far m hia intelXect ia a oartain divine ttiin^g

an iaage of Oed, nol^l ) to hie natfire more tban t)i«

eonaiaeration of ttisee ti . .. <.«oa«^ icao«in«( otireelvea ««

riee to a kaMie<^e of t < le m& ultioateljr to a ooiwider*

ation of the thin.^ of 3o^.« .hi 9 ia «l^ it to fitting tiiat

tMM ^ ,. --.jj^j^l j^^ lutrivee

(40)

at the knewl »

Page 370: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 371: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Sine* «• iMHi M^ th«t tM» tt %h« end in wMoh o»b««i!^1aHv«

fttllolt^' t« fl»tAl>lli^«l« m^et^y to have mt onljf %]i^ U>^ts 9f

«M*t «Mi tll«MiiMrt mgmit titteU«et Jciin«a f* ^m moI m ftrst

ta.« r«rthttv, to httn %h/* U#« «f th« Ia««lIi««aeM nM ef Ma

JotMd %9 It sot mOsp m tffl«l«Rt in ttk« eMM of alMitffMtion ttom

piwRteciw Ittt «!« tm A>ra* «• jreffcetion, la ttm kiWNrivet^ 9f

ftlvia« thir^* In th9 foaaer tb« tllasdrntion is for tii« |»i«*

doction of ^» cttiiv«raalf 1b ih« latt«r it is the vearltrt^ls

^•9t»iiia« ftf •a$»«iri«ir Ixtt^Ui^it? - ' -r^» in this sens* it

mtaSA Im trns ts s^ thst the seii&«&t« «g:«nt lntellig«nB«s aaft

^e Flfst A^«st XBt441i{^^ t^ s<»sa df ram Mw fl«a&t inteiieet fii^i«iitiil «llh t9xm ene

^«i Ai%«rt is iKw i^ato^s—tng ys^iaiy t« the eul^dUMldtaiS

point of big oan i.-saitUn^ ?tte t»m lOdlnAi he^ been ^v«a

iaiciet«»ee in isftt let in a far mre s«tfmt en; in Ood «Bd

1^ iBi«le* -* ' .^t tfee imiX «r lam megr W |i«vf«et«A it Ss

aeeeesavy -

-'nayefl frsn oetter in ioiovietf^

aentt tt^.

.

oore ftkin te l^eir MLaf

is tfte angfAm «nS te SMU Xb ttils eojr ttte Dmmo ere rettaeed

sisre to divine ijelng; V^rouknti 1^ seal of nftn« amh • redttttieii

ii pto^er *'^ "*•* "»«»ea the ^osels K-r- heee f»re« eireeciy

Page 372: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

I

Page 373: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

ft* 3« mUm 17&3%« AllWFft

t%«cnt« ia a divine aaamf 0f iHiing wia thiir aye Ssiitt«»tM» »%

ta r<M«ivlag[ inti»Ut«il)l.« twm fvon Ibi]]^* tet in eioiag; ia

kMtovirvf intellit^ldliil;; on tliin@B* uoiuMqawitl^ it oeevum onljf

^Hamek^k mm to irtm ciod haa glv«i povoro oaa ov^brs —l^lgr to

thot tnd* i&t tltoot fono «i« not ndo att£fioi«nti;^ divino

tlitoa# tho tat«ll<ctq» ia offceta nor ftvon ^ the jnteUoetm

«doat<y« thore is n»9mm*sjf & Qmi4iineti9n« tlivoa^ the intejlectoo

aoeimiiativttf and the jnteljeotae diTinaa. of the eoal matk tiMHK» fonat

to tbe Aa^ic end MvIao Ualti^t* ^lur, iSixwu^i ana mere 1«

esMayUiJ^oa Mm rotkNtiMt Of «tie vorlci to jodi I9 j«9«reoe*

ivel;? tfei^^er kziovin.: men is retumia^ \HAh Iblaoolf eol tfee eorldi

to the ?i»t C||«ne« Zt maU \m better to ai^ t}Mt the FIret

Ceaee ie redtieta^ to Kiaeeif the «orl« Iqt reOosia^ to Hiiaoelf

(49)tlie eool of tmom we sitneae here tite ean^letion of the t^l%

which ke^pa Araoi ao4« ihe ^yole or te^a^ i» eloeingr ^9tm

iteelft its WAd ia in ite ^a^jintde^

Here tbe mtiX yeeeiirM ita tattna'ie perreetioa in thia

life* It re<iaired tk« te*3jr at the Tm^LesAws^ txtt nam it ia

porified imi|{>ieteljr fx*offl ito Imms^t* the 9mX r*rs led tedc to

divine ^ein ^^ - <?r«tian etaade in m aseu oi aat«ri&i

ot)j«ote or oori^^oreal organic LnatrtiBeata« for a aitlMitefioe poaa*

eeaeft of divine Iwta^ and operation tmtt&M aothlac Iml ttM ^vio*

Page 374: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 375: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

!• a« MilUr 176

Li^t ttl»»si«l^ «bteh it b

mot Yqt th« littcU«tttc

I^N»of of i%B imerlftUv*

to tt« ll^t «f the in^^s and «n 094

eMuw on «lMi Hi* tMil ««>p«nA« aoootAing %• %sm aoeoMl^jr of ito

V017 VotB^ th*« Mol Attains tfeo fOOt oM^ iMOVteaity «t|d

Cfttyml foliolt;«

-'<4 %kJL8 j^crfoet «tot««

'^** eosa? A*otfet» '^lio tteAdtoiN*

tMO 8NM>« j>«?f«Bt OtOtO iO 1^0

UfttlAg mutHUe In knetrlag

(61}aofcoft Mnooif laMnrtal*

J«Ot M t60 %iiAC tf ^^« «>«dl i* ^!^^M 1^ MM*

Its q^oo oot flow tho orient Intolloet in liui lli^t of ^Jo4» oo

too th« 0000 Intollootualo In tiio jp«oolUo Intolleet io il^mi

«M» ogottt Intoiloot In tho I* Qod, iHtx thlo nooon at*

aiMirt eon oonoetljr toy the. «l io of ioMovtolIt^ of

tiko poooftUo intelloot Io f»OM &<'«

iRtotloettnl Uixm i« ^!^^<»a ^^ M*)

itself eavl ito a«oo« littoUoat M t

> '*«^^«(ll«et Jttot oe Ito

(69)o 9gr MQolt]^

Itoolf In Its o^oeto

of «ko ogont i»toU«ot

pIlMM Itt OQOh »-

¥bo pvlneli^o o

•'«v«r«

Intelloot Wmaoo

-"- -----aeo ovon

ioltlon

• . oon(M)

/?«llt

Page 376: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 377: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Rg 8, aiutr 177

toMXwt In ttklB a«riftef th^t tiaeo^i^ G<mJ«ia»tlon to tiM «gtnA

IntellMt mi f9m «h« Jatelleeteg tAi&^» aurlsM «ad ^« ^Ktl

OBjT •wrj59 QffMtva to still amrc i)«arfeot )ciio«l«d/;«, Ithout saeh

onion the«-« e«a %• m suoli 60«unu»e of tonortAlil^ in toia

ltt«l h« liio iMM nat aeqalrflcl hi« ova ftgmt intelloeto «• fora

mat reooivo it Troa dod in ^« noxt lifo*

- g»4ix iapoytoUtfttia io ^^rooiooljr %bm ^mI for trhieb

iSt. Ail»«rt ma oioi'i^* ^~-f; t-oMan lanoiPtaXlty in th« ugOatk

«i«li «M loot ootMCftt* tntolligoaoo ^oeomo j^ovaona iawrteli^

fKT Jl%« AIlMvt ia tiM Oidlm «1^ 9tut em «^«it intoUoet «aft

tlio ll«bt of tho Ma&AB bjoA omm 'Sh^ Ch]rl«ti«ai«Ation of th*

*»U»n tfemi^t »aaehaa a lOfSt^ plm^ to th« tlMti«ht of 3t«

M%«tt. -^nrladipt ia necooaaisr for Umax*

tAllt^* i»t«Iises hiaaalf Iqr twiwdng intolli^ient* mme

it io troftto aojr ^»t ^"^^ *^U«b of iMmm tawvlofis* aatl ttM

probloa of tho xtAix i %^b &r« o>^ and too aaaw*

Haviag •ofeiavod hie objcci hi.;i^iljir «^i«opriftt« for SU

Alib«rt to anyi 3io ^^ coaelttditar altjaa porfoctio aniaito

intoll<K;t^«a«

Page 378: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 379: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

aw «» uumS%0 A1UV%

in

In th« lnt«r«t8 of hl«t<«i«ia aMwaMjr It le iav^niUv*

%• a»«« the ndiofa ioa<i«M« &mUA ^r th* AfRttm ^toMi^«r«

oa th« flwwtioa of «i« tltfto^ vf M« AiDort* A d«lieet« r«»

•«rv«, h««wr«», ni0t \m fmniatiA* fK«r« U * Btmng Uxf^tmUon

to «dto tho Ooeiviao of :^« Ai^rt «l%b «At of tbo ^»ft%i«RO«

1^ woommTt to 1M»t toqptatlm oeisULd im on «rror maeh amro torioao

tlMtt tiio ti»4itifl«Ma ip»rin^ of «ho«« roUtloao* certOciljr

SU AXWtt took ««ott«>« froM tlMi iiio«tliitonte j^looepl^ of

Avioenao* this, he it« onoUoA ld» to lM#M»niao»faQ0«i»

ntfttal t«Bat» oi i,« < ^ 'Ith tho doetvi&o of ^lototto

Ui ltd dlv«r«« »toe«o»

io OMnlaoUon of the ^por&tlan of the As»st

tatoUoet In tbo writii^^ -. .• .- ^t »» M 4ifOf««A ff««

hio tialQfio oone«ption of tlu» banon ooia* ^ o«9«rotis« tho

aottott of ooial ffoa ^to aotioa of fom (nodo poooiUo thrott#

AVicemiQ } dt« &lUr% fMlUoMl a Anal iloflatUoft of tho oaai

ahieh onimaod at onoo Ito Otttetantlall^ laA^^onftoat 4tiiafBO«o»

ta tM i>Utoaio«u\u^tiati]itaa ««n»&tliM «bA |ta lo47 oomalio-

tns irtMNMttor rfcoA tlM itnotot^iiM donBltlaaa*

In th« ooal oo doflnod, otanftln^ as it dooo on tho horlaon

Of tlno t^tu ^4.Tdmitjrt thoro io a nooooasr;, ^i..^^^ .^. . *»<i%

Page 380: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 381: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

.V, .# Lille* 179

^M» ttm^orel a&ttitftt «ayla» aa s^m^ i»t«ll««t i» y«itax'«a

to r<oS«r th» ronaa 2a tluit vatlA MltKU* far ki»iiUigi» Mmp*

li{>ortftat still* Ta&a i« & at»r wwiditi iaad lOstt %imBSplT«« la

hlri} i« but a «wU-ao6U oo*«^ »ir wl».t is tmna^Uirt in tim

iliaXa itnlvoTM* or la ao^ 9ri^«r oi' thA% unlir«iNiOf for la «v«ry

ffi3iir«rs« tiMBM 1« ftivftjw «Mi flzst univers&l A^enU fiaet^me^

turn t3d«tCB6« of «R iMS«stt lrkt«Uo«% ti^^

ttoooMNury* 1« oo«i£»6tiHos^Ui tiko v. e or

tiio Ismaa oool* QoagnmiA vf too StttelBilo £ttaMl 9tSi»t^l«o»

t^ oat «aft saooat^ la an lORea of aad« st» iutonatlna iMd

alasjra MtinlidnaA that tfea aoul la nada la tha lMa«a of '^od*

For ti%m AXiMivt, ^a fOMi Of tha fom of tcta aoul la tha ^IttiV,

atti In aaeh a «aatri&« tM iiaf la laf1i oj^n far Uvloe XXltnl»»

alMUaiti

It aaa St» Al1»art*a j;>«raonal atealca of isanlaa to diaaovar

that tba aana tjoraa taUtUnt 1^ nMnh Avtee. abaft

tba osi^ of tha aapatftta inlallieenoaa axiatad ant aH^^Nd

in ti^a kaaaa ao^il) n la o ajpyr tymftaa* Hanea fmn «m»

fanaal «atMv«i—^ .- - ui^laa af oa%aait}«a *» tha aaal

daarita t^ asalliie Intallaeta aa iatriaalu i,»rinclp|aa

of latalXc ration, and ih» a^tor aa«aa>ia aba«aatar of Ha

Page 382: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 383: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1* Q» ittU«r

H* AllMdrt

•»&l to a m^^anxte ln%«Ut@««o«» t9v in l«««ir it U u mi)»»

Am a onitiur^ir atitelMan this eoul ia a tatw iwtaatatlir^w.

••Btelnias: 4t» £«««» aata at infUacttu H«r« %im vaallatt of

twam mA «b«iv i^«^mlilra 4M«vi «• aUt^UA in jMstt fvoei ^llwrt

or laiUara aai in fatt <yott iwle«n»» pamtt ;»-%« MVtrt ta ra»

«a«« tlM i^aawa saeiMluit tm t^wm* t&aa tha 0aal rtaatna u»-

ts«HM^^ imnortal* dn thla eanef^tiaa i^« Al\>art JoMiM tM

A»iatatcUaa»^via«»atttii ^smi^ptos •# %bi» m*mto9 aas intttlor

a«M»«i> 9t9»9m%9K^ t» ilia l»«fttM«l «f ^% mmtml praUan of

«»• 9mmmaatiHm litwwa ^a^y wtf aool* l^ a aaMia diattnotlon

^ aatabltahM tl»% ^a lateUact casMiniteataa, not ditaefl^ vitli

tlM to«;r« tm attfe ft leaver af «ta oaaly ilia irtiaritagta, tf^teii

aaimniioAtae aivaatlj «t«i tha ta^» an& tfeoa l^mli^iaa a faall«

•alatlon af tiia rngmwrnnff l&aalaUa ptoUm mt tha aalvtantial

ti»i<8» af \9&y and aata*

a nMt«r atvMca anaUaA $t* Al^art t» ratain aU IM h»A

^tattaoaly atf«ytttt iwm tba tM»HPliat»a|« tiaAitlaa» aa& avaa ta

•M flOta t» St, «t«Wttt alMrtairti^ «m atetiviatias tlunr? af

Axiatatla* in ovfiar ta aa^laln tte ^;>faaaaa af atettaation

8t« Aitert firat tafataA tba iirakfan oaetrin* af tha unlvarMa

Page 384: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 385: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

iBUUwtt «taM« ffeiaeHim is loth to lUafBdJws itncL to ftta«r«o««

fitvever, ainoo tho j^lnoi«>l«8 of ^olng aad th« iiirixwiploo of

iawviiitf Mr* iaaiotinet tte mmn tetof for*nftitia opototoo vOj

in «h« diooovorjr of * m^m^ «lkieh of iteolf is inaiff«r«ilE,

Ibttt univorooliseUo* ifle«Bna*o Infiotoamtooa n&tore in eo

oactotWMi IMOoaoo tbo ol^oet of iit* Allwrt'o aGertt iiiteU«e%

irtkooo ottM«M3t«r io oaaloiEM* ^ ^^ amt)t«a Sotor ortt.rua

fwwtioaine iKM in o feWMiiMa foehton a« ft flMml^ of tho oo«l«

In its o^orfttiaa «bo snont intslisot roeeiTOt otttitani*

froM ovoc? side* On tlio sido of tbo o%4«^ knovti it fimts «

vorld oonotan«l7 otAnittsA i» tho MiteUi^iUo li^ht of tbt

Virst Couss in wisioh 1% tea 1»t to iiooovoy aattsroo oi^^Uo

of %«ii^ ooa^lotol^ tJsiivsrsttliBOcU On tii« si<ie of tho ooltloat

lE&oslntf Uko intolloet is omuitwitlj' toeoitriri ' '^O^EOaoo of

Divine I48lit i» i^ faastian of al^strsetim ana liitMsimtlon*

Toy at. All>ort« »a for at* Avij^iaotine, 3od is the Vmm Jiwitot*

Mt ii%, A«i4$uotin«9 lM«OT«r» tbs doeteino of illairilMlllllil iMWii

on tlM tvttttk of 4«&«w«Kte» not on ffao «1»0t»u»tion i«EiiTor»

al* For Sit* .*ll»crt, tho Xlftao t?^'*'— -i«- 'x '^- «•>

.

i^«««»*

tfao iasaffiei«M? of tho hmm oee lleet tgr addi

11«M of «&o ofiont latotloot in its aatocal «t«r»tloii« )

Page 386: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 387: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU 0* KiU«r 1889t« «lt«H

nmi»omXk9 miA mjs^^mptim^tt »iae« tlw ^ tt of ti)« Mal^ tiui

hflRfi* thft a^amt tntellaot Is Tuctajr^at? satelttad to t^>« T:lTtz»i

tttt^t All «%»t»««ti<»HlUtt«iiuti(m| irtMr* £>t« mifa»%irm *U(»iA

•f m afttOTM interpose la «h« iUumtnAtion, 3t« AHmtt tfitio*

lnt*«r4/r«- of ^t•'^ rt^li, --''id<M(inft«

^« ffc' - . thwstj «? St. AllMNrt

r«3ult» im>- tr^ • ' -* «5« n«»M|'U«&ii« i»i!tUn ^tt^lm of

llto 8«iwr"t« &3ttAt int<aii to A ooil fit for v ^mitio

'' " .; J* Xi,*ai*y a «ois4tlon tt '. ^^

in j^wrfootls Ifiltloa of ]p'

iiTrnortolllyri *«*

i^* ii.lbert. t'fsiT^ « Cterlo%lan» ^<^i«l^^ ?*;-1l f .AT 1 »«. » »l f» » .1 ri*

Page 388: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 389: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1, <i« mn«fSt. AlUOft

MS

Pi9«t eM»«* "^4 meiS\6xAe9 of tht jpNtttid •MttBt % th«

lieht of «»• m^&0 td ualoa wi*to ^t »itln« M^it a»t piwI^flA

fo» St. AXWrt ^ ttw «iq;»l«aeti9n trid^ tbe wmWani <»ff«r«A

!•» th« wnlon of tii« tool *« *»»« !»•* Wii«l«t« lttt«lll«5«»e*

SIM «oflt«kt Of tho «>»l*8 koMiloaso In this rmla, t. rlix^

t«MH«o» ft« dirfiotl^ r«e^f«a la Ito oaiM ^ «^* ongOio oatt

jslvtuo 14^*1 «MW it aao l%» tEMwl«d#o of *fe« M@^» ft«fi •*

Qod* ^2hl« aidott «oa^l«^8 tho «yoU of b«l-^«, oaft reatewwo to

Alvlno b«la« Ifeo farai In ««*tMP» iQf »«ta»iia(| ttoooo ten** In

iia0«ua«o« t» ood* «h»» 4aM s^ AtDort aot ei4jr n^« ^^

«oal ft saftiotttioo to ItOOlf* aepejmto f»i» tfeo b«Jy «ai4 tfc«OiO»«

SiH»vtftl» feat h« ft««» ta tw iUniMaiMi oaotbot %sf&9 of liaaort-

allty. mm iMortallseo hii^«lf ^ MMitdaff ttto btti^to of

teooloa«o« V9 9«r«S«tt «i« s<»al tfeMiNSii tho la»«iltctm> »Afc>tM.

*>.« <»t«^t#fltoa ft«rtiiiAl«tt?«» Qui ^€ i«tolloeta» oetttotao 3t.

Al\mtt «iMVgo« oltb ft @url8tloiiiaad radix jawgytalltfttia.

Page 390: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 391: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

0%» A&*btHi

IH

wvsn fo ammrnnm

{%) 9m ««iK*« 9t 8t« Albert to «!i£i^ «il w^mmmm^ w&moB£^ctsy»

j^aaiDam nvMg

Page 392: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 393: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9t,

"-^

""t^Lfi tM tm mmt m^U •mmm

«h»Mi tlsiln^ eranft^A irt»y %• ana&r« ir«ft%«« In ti» flacwt, intrt 9f th« '^mm je a^^j^t^^^!r.^^

'^^^'

- --' » -- . - - 'WmmSwtrnrrtisii, ? ?? an*! as, i.

. ?<?•

;. dc crcfit'o-la utta written iM^^^-m AS40 and l£4l«

{£) •>Hgij^^ AC Il« troAi i» i|* 4|, intro&asUoa vol*

.--i, "it it m»t '

---yl ftis

,i« lii t^.e |[«r^': - ~- ....U*M»«^

:« r«Ti«l«n« . >a of HKla ^xansI'sti^A

U ma9milm%lsf ^inf^i*-*^^- ><My At lift

*^<b _^ ^» "^-^ J» 4ito »Hiai» \i

v.. ::,.:Tar(t B-^A .-_- . -.-_ :- jj«i-«Atei re«tiE.t t<?lt-ujr at sit ts ssj^ftntlf prl-'«l.jlua

i__.-. .......„.;«* dteitar : « -i-i» tsxt Isfto th« lett^ &1^&% odssnftsa ttt w^^t It ftetiiail^ M.0

v3 i, «*ii^, l» ¥«nl „.ior., 150S, ft>ili '%

Page 394: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 395: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

!• 8. JttU«Vat. AitMort

xsft

s«(itftt Igltttr ttt elt In «8o«nti6 mtm prluclpliw p»»«t«r

tudtiA ooypor«l1»t«^ fit W a <?» «BW»nt tf* ' "*--«

8« actiorwg cupe aon amw walaa jaoai. t e""

'

" ' "^— ^-"'-"••••« l¥x«w._ .#w

«t%b th9 iMt ana and«rl

tpMlAl rvfwnee to wd.

In i5t. AlMvtt It«Bi| ifl

ci^ilaB «aitnu)dl a #« aff

<

«t rant tolaistf«i«i ini?<»

8l»ll 0M ^tlft«raaa «soXa

d«tflriBln«(l onl^^ to one t

ttftmot propwljF )» ay^Uvin this p«iMttt«B« ef•

«^ V>-J

c. Ill, p. 78 sq,

(8) itia*» a»i eozitta 6» p« 8ai nan es

MAW liaa ait ^aod tea aaaiiia at

ma aaiia tteo^t Sn aUks^ljf <af^

jiT^rig^

il £,iA<»«« tiV4

,«... .._ alt n(KH» «l«w qaofl falnwia itffUawra ^« te«

artma jsarffictl mo. ^rija lam aftgaWlatti ntalla»tw

aoaiaia* qoB a^pallatuir liaaa raa 4aaa iro "«'« a»

ral»tlima qaaa tetet*

a»lclt» . f• I r eoX« Sa* at tea iw

^MMtISSm^^ a»a aK rtot asaastu* aaa

mwita tn qaa aentliiatar paataa*

(7) smiw da Caraat^t r. 11, tn 1, <!• 15, a, I, ?• 10.

(S) tr

A alimarSt, AlUsrtAar/ootin© '

eorpori ec

» tr» 1, tim s, &• I, i>,10«

Itlan i^tvpavtaa wi ea rwo St." •^tKr*tla inegg^!>0reft »

vol* vV', .>•

*

eturo

jnpon 1*

atelehar

r aa rMaarehoa aa tba

"vn r«v«»la& *a d»ta tte

/I eoMi Itoa tha pen'illjr «atad

, _w 'jricaBKt-

olio a r. elater,

Page 396: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 397: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

187

28wSSI

'«^^«"&iir ^ss^narr^' •a*

J-'.

ftMfi%«d to Aloher of clAivukoXt « Cietttrolsn Uvinei ab»at

jsl j^-1. ^^oaMSiS^.^ma^S"'

jjiHwft, ««£>• 8, wl« 6, i»* fi08fc» alanir villi ^M hkmmte u^wl <» l«iii» m <S&tgat «f•

(9)

(r

«Mt«i 18 is St. As«a»tiait»

M Soirttft «rt .4ct8Mi#, (a, f, I.# 4d» eol* 781) aatf fXM^W« Into 4»« wvks ftf «t« Al^Mttt*

I him m% \)*m ftM« to rial lav vwifiimtioa of thin ro-

f«v«MM In «M ftwidU^o «Mrk» of 1mM«»« ^ eoiMNilfttiMi

it ttet X ttoff* thia «ita6>iiol«ElnMi villi M^K^S^iiliJ

4» B« 6» M vol>OM^<^t« &er XMlooOi^hle

«ith A» C«_ Fjl

irioo 6w ««oM^f a,

sit4«i

ontaai;>orl

c aintfe eon^nrjr rtnUotlolis 4«ttaitloa mft ttet

tMorfc io Qttit* aj^£«««nt« fh«bo tbo oootioii of 3t« ineottlno

-«t>.»tM»*i»-

*•*"*

)i'0» oui vlt«tfn« inenaantnv'^

, noB oiiM o to tt^nnoto:

Li alloA ott «nM oitMUifi

>voo 0ttl)tta&tla« 09X«*

\ %«ui, IsnovtoXlo,;^ftnl0 lattnuito

tiMffl, ot glf/jn£9«ai'-- '-\AlMHaft (mono

j$ font

Page 398: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 399: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Urn a* MlUtr8t« 4ll)«r«

IflS

(U) St.not

U, «sx). 2, 4| 'p. h.

(ISI

|.v'» L*( vol 'J 300i, Ol'. jil«»

ttttca* £>• XI, tr* lfi» q« €•« aon* It vol* ^» P« ^*

to th« Bft(

ir:

iuri«it»i«i«f

AftmoRtlt.pMsiei or

this pftMMK?-'

«dSttoii of **>'

i TOlaftU* •rttieal tmtnHa«he t«3e% of AlfroAttfl «» lookI, !• 3«-?« 3« !• 2t MHonaliM'm eorporitt a^Apti MRMMm

> m^3d oatf sod es «o'^ •« dlfflnitlOBm

i.i f,-/^'.< iL?.«<uv. .'A v» it% M coin ooftsld**

incw >ot«ikt' totellMtlvB* llloali*-

t oltim rolttUooo p«toip«lt)tt» at- QAg^italo t»9A .OnoerlMtair}

-inti^tei in Icnurehlft soa)«rfo8^o «ot e9ts0tla*n «hftt i9«sr f)»lloo inAtt«r «« R»k« s^M^l. doftnltlon eott««iB«d ia'"T KxA 1««« eooploto

% kaoMn aot naEey^taiotyqa Ale jA

.. -, . ., leimwmitt - .--

(19) If thio 4«flnitlan is in 'ODoea I iaen «iMtd It^ fta bMA> attatMtr, aB# cit. , i. 363, noto 8, liidlo«ttoa« of

Page 400: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 401: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

IGU

1. filler

muTSBSt

40. ci^» 13» «>l* *•• •••ly ••

aoti«r of ClfttTRuis 9S«i»Ujr »«0'

i • U vol<

(16) Bmm do cfoftiit U» q«s, a l» »«ft oonti* 4, fol« », ^ 12»t

tim% fho iCTls splrttaal t^* io In iiSSjAaSg^iiwt 2, M»* 3. *• »• <»l« ai A «»• c5^I«toly«wtt»s>j4

S^m.^x, i-JT 87V, coX. X. St. AxWr bu r«rm»«

4iMo Mt •wuiSri^ voffOtaUXo ot aaiwX* vxnt UUoo«MBii«xioiii« «Ma taakonti sfilan ot«Bta m% ssriiMipiu

Imftttoiiio tt «08«lfttiflBto tioo* 41xS«»f «i«o -

S^taa ant«M l^poooittX* out omo 14 to effer

a«r aalMHi. «% mtoa Mt mooa, n4« ••% tie* <

«« Atoi «ao4 oaMtotaii px^ffitw ImA«% «mo t« -

^ <SnOd l»« ftot OMM tltMrtMl Ml «9M M«pootia ft4T«itot anl o, alout ^^mo aXiqti* qmt

mxtm to ^«» 4if:rtol«iOM nes in oiuo d«ot£

Sw or4to«» oloat di^^lUo Moi4«a4ian «a&

••aalttariMiio •mWootl ool <»om«eiiUaa« nooossfcria «^ a*a

•ttSTMaotttitMitto tuMt^twi In offoctu. urtfeet I? ^-

IB thjwm on %M» to«* l^y rwidln' ^0$^:^^ ^^'^'^•» - ^

ool« Xj ^yatofc «V9t i>«rf«ctlo e

Mtt, Boo oBto toMniM onto ^^^<^ ^^,

iteu. r ' ^«[J f

"" ?^:r

Page 402: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 403: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

IfO

»>v ,^

i*r8T«Rt tiie col:

Vil*4w

tMMI cat i-'-

.,v o ' o * fTC: is a

i« of «h« t««m;i e«tttiiqp

» p« Org ..J . •i ^9 J-^

ia:i..

a•111©

^dp«« '.S*) iV, l»li», „-«!•» VriJl, ifj>. r»r-3*,

find* c—to«'tw*fjBaft d»iUy m^tax la teaatat i^ia pttlti^

,.

,

. J. -. aaralier !• * iBal«tikn«»« '!»»• ffftHiKwl

18 ft 8u1W%IM^e»} i&]' '

"ft -*•

'« r^'r>t«ir«i- s»7'-s ;? -

tl 3 ia itaelf & ft*^ • iilnc* *h« t<Ml

la Bit «u«.' , i« i^ 3 y.iOBtjKin'** <^

of.

o *»"•.>- i! htJ iS'tJiHt I'lU'W! fv

St» AlMrft ca*Jtt not ^wv*- r«.

:hi««. %(>

v.. « «>.

Page 404: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 405: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

in

of th« mml \iu ?iato aad Arl0t»U« In Mb ix /aajb» Anm

tvaaiiiaM nwTSt «»«• tgr S«im or ^«tn« ef« <aiMa»OP* cit« . p* 83, m%9 l» we ttiopl? ol^ev ttio W^Mrar

ft iBtrttat Libor <« •wMw in t»nJo&MMMi ai»sal«wt» eft&» ill, ex-, v.

OMtawiiNBHUittiii waft dttattiamllBM om «i« M{$sn«Btt at* AVmetX»nt»n frm thtra to oo^lnin tUM ft«fittiUoa of tbe «4mlmgmjgkn^mt^ fir«t to tiio t«ct of Ge«t»«««BH;AMtItaiiB tai«B «PKttB htm Aau aeftaltSoBot et lUMiploMtt

A prifa»9 qaae oot c'latonia, «t eotooAaanSt $«dA oniM stt

Mitttntttt* «t dioiHGBii 4«l««aid Y«oipit oi^t«itft» mn irtt

•t t«BaKMIdl« la 900 mmr^Ma* Mt oak^toetiUu ieAroeix^it ops?08ita» ooa «lt vam, lumvn ct taBOtft^llfl

in ran oo««iHft|i vt isto «^ mtetintla* Itea dioftmoi«ai««aa wvct tsdtotMliMit wt «d«toiittftt mA Miai'novtt •orptui, eorxw Mit4Mi oatataatl* o»t, aaioti er^o•itetttitio «et, ef« co«to>'»i»^a8oo, Pt Btffar!- ^'- nlaoe

"SmwsTIttfg. p* m* For tl» t«rt of .J^w^lsoftllnua, •

taBttMglUntf. (^|:^J^J«» f* 105 r: o Into nai

mfmm* «^m4 oatm mAmi sit s«a»t»tttU »ie p:

(iBle«iiiiA Meipit OMt«Mria» mm dt omw it U< ^

otitetoBtla «ot« Sod aalaa mmmm oao et OMicr >,

vitljplt MRtittria ^iOM •oRt vlx>tBt«i «« vitia,

IM «t tHatitUf «t ottiwtia «t l<ia»i«ntia*

oaliataiitia O0t» (a oaovaviMa af tlio thrM »artMmi M* AIMtt tt»o4 0<M>to^^«»»l,ac«» not CtanaiBi;

for tMo fJnJt iotg«8»nt#)

It< MJA apt, ottt oot oglMMWtf* oat e^

8»* py -" oo»tdy»» aaiiiu^yyi oowTay^cd^iurH

;t'

'

•^«io tfootyqit ms«l<im» wtj #^oktonJl'fe" antgm at ropofloBo qor-

onlaa jttor- '.^ a^ crj-y eat^

{i-^itW i V; u..-Mi;r.iL-^-'-^

i'

(16) Of* pne

^^^^ ^BLj££££Si*» ^* ^» intr96«» vol* 36, 9* SO* 1!hi« A«»finltion is not ofi o«Mih In {"lato* fatboe^ it la of a naaoturaa i>la%onio toir ifeort InttVMA it fromOo«t»»»f6oga^ M^ g<ptia jntaao at 3glritna.

aP^TT^E^git« > p* loU i>ieaaa> itatna ti>K iUtoaie 6ofiAi'ti Aoifla« iiiQ<at» aat oottateatta

Page 406: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 407: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

im

vltiMklcrMara* ^ this d«llnitl<m «e «lab to •«« fortH

tiM ibllowiag o«lectloa« of . lato*o thooeM «» ««Flft^

«»noA of tbo ^Ifttaoie eharftetvr of tlio 4ofiiiitla»i »wAl M AoMHial ooofwoo of «h« 4efiAt%loni

U) Lw> Ht. x» eSfio. riv;. trsaol. ??y !'• r„ Bnisp iS»o

LoolTTfM&ioel titfttX7 sortoo) f»X* S* ^utasw** Saa««

Hov TMk« /?«^<i /'.-^^^ !«* to tfco d«ft»ltlOTi of tfeftt olJjoet

«blch has for ^lto newno iBOaX'*t Coa wo glw it snjF otfeor

doflnition ^oa t^t ototoA iwt iw»«-4h« notioii frt^i^ ?«

novo itSOlf?«<-OOjLf««>T0MRt %9 tiMB AttfinitlOIH«»t

'

«oo«a* oe tm mm «o aBlvotooll^

«hAt X ftooorttt

(%) llajtogo M6S In '^ Moiyaioo ff ^^l*to. ^ • ^««»1«

j««o^i» ^00 Vo > Ian bxA Co* 139S» v « 48lt

2tio ooal Itofou -^Ing to inBort&l» ~— -^ wtAoh

mvm oootKor t ___^__ ^ «»^«r» in oooolng to novo*

«ooooo oloo to Uifo. ^^^ ^^(o) La»o X, e9de, Mjettf. i/*^^^J ^'"w *• •>» »*«** **•*

«• oSylWt tho ooai i» ptiM to tho tedar, oaa tiat tc^o

tody io oooom on j aftotwurtfo, onft lo liwn tf obg?

«lio ooia» ohtok I \T'(d) gJIMfcOqO %0B ' • IWj't ( *^*« ^»«^

ClM«i«&l UtNTOfgri i

Bq« a« ri^gaido tjif> "

dooovito It ftftw ^» »i«a i*

to *o ywmgmt ^m- > ^^

pr&miylo of oool* fvooid offMBd it o oMrtc

9KV0 it all tho tody to bo Ito vobiolo*.*..

1201 «Fm, Am r^m^U^ ll» q« S» «1» eoU p« 88*t (&niaa) n©wtac^ oovs^tto ipo* OKiottoo ianoMlio »» flO« ^or oooldtBO

•aton mota n»tst mtji^ffioi t«i«» ol«m;t dielt ' hllooi^^liMHif

«ovoatitoo mUe mfminat m «»o in noUo Q<int« t^ taeiin

dioit AMostiHiio* isaod Miiiw oot in ooi^vo otoat smm o»t

in esadet «aia oiovt Pooo in wm^o ooiotono oootora wvetit* Qood aoa ootottur i>or oo vol p«r oooidonst ito emSjm

din otottt in o!«t^ dofioit a uoo. Ito tiHm m^ aoilfa

Page 408: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 409: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

193

8, 0* UllXvtSt* Alt«Vt

^fieit « n»tttt« diTlm nvUva* Sht %«t «f ^3Pl»t<rtl«

4, 408i»0-«4. j^i.,e||», P. 4l» At^ «wtd«B» »•*««

(6a»t«3»B Tl«i«lle«% P9K»<am)9 In «ai> («alK», *•?•*

M»TWi •t n»van <i«14t« •* mtOmt AUo tarx ,>fUrt

atmit, ttt mlna MMntaai l«ea» aovtatar* hen Alfe«rt

iMBtUM AttsiwtiiM b«r« te ItM Is «IbA St. ln«*s

ii« aiMBl lid Uttegftn^ nil* Mi^» ail »• » '• 3*»

(SI J Smu «3><dl#. II. tr» li2» <l« 6»» •• 2» ^ i» oi iiio.

. Ol-ltlO«

122) og» olt» . p. Ua* or /V»l««Bii •*• ^« ol^«» *^» 1» «*»• ^»

£• 4v col* 2a»

•£• p* l» a* 2*

tS4) Sua. &• Cgtttt* > Ii» «• 4i *• U »• 32« Sfc« •MvUaaBtwqr

9t mA rtWOTit til nm rmiriiTi dm ^aa>. Vli^ol* II tr« is*

q. 79, n* 2, ft. a» tol« ^53, i>. 13a»l^«

{m 1^3 2ft oig., »* 3«i^ if««tuaiy «!• MM ata«*tl«a U•^wa la Sflfc gtoilU, II, tr. IS, «, »» ? ^ ••

?! ^-•^m 1, wl. wrfrffc «b«« ot. ^XUat ftw>t«« Qr««war of

Z ar««»'3?;;SSn«H *•• lit Ut«r dtfinte »• demotion

flottrtsh«a «•«»«» til* ta« of th« IborUi or *• Istguntag

0f th« fifth Mutuqr, «'• iiMWl^BSe ^^^^^^^vl^^^^*'

S tTtoi^. ef. r. % toU 46, col. 107-222. lo i»«d««

vt^y tW th« eoooaft el)i»t« of tiio iy St' 31 *^

B«M(il«i« At tilt tiao of St. Al%«rtg tK^ ^•5**_^thtt £• B»tw« aoBAuli i& tM £»tl» Umtli > iiw firot

SI jSJrW^i^Tog^aArtwy of aaom u ^^"^l. in

tfeo «l«W»th oootaiy. «» Mooaft oant f»^ + Of

ImgaiMm of i^^loa (d. U94) aHoat llbd. >^

to HdA of tho too tioaoloti >• % t '-j . j^t.-^ *o *i^u6r-

ttlMA tor I.00S014 awa. op« ci «. ^ >a«a *ii.

Page 410: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 411: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K« a« Millar

a e«ap«yative tablo of tlM» thjr«« tato of t«x%« «nd oon««ladM tl»% £»it« ii¥«rt «t«4 the tfWEMlaiioa of Wmgm^immtit* traruiltttioa of AlfMMi to to te foons in sowwii

m lAtinaw ^wiMii'atuo. <^t« fe> JwrtaMMCfgottt'-"'""!'''

ot;>»l-f.

For tfto tnmalatioa of Iiiir^;tB«litW|| of* -...il

"M'WlT'lll"!!!'"! AL';rlgg^»t»«WlJhW^O of I^MOtittO ISMHTO MTfi thOOO OtJOOtiolUIMl«rSfr^lMrt Attrl^too to citogoisr m «lroetoa o^inottDo A»i«tot«ilon ««flnittoa of tho oe«ltU) Sioat «i^U9i lllic f^^itiis notto porflQlt o«al«ic»« itobio ginito ottiao ia oovporo ^ocftott «i^UE»Ot ut MH{sto oiitt

•oi^ro oit Mmooa oiidi* imh^m o«r;^i» •!»• cmtao* (od» cit«

(2) Bon potoot igitfiur oaiaa Boi^iunum tUlaa aodsia mtoloohiaeovperio o«m» eoA oalotaBtfttt oatotollo ifi oot p«r oo

fwfoeto iaooipox'oa* { iM,d.« p« 37)S} AViototilloo MclOB onlnMi ORloloQhioai Aioens naUo oimui•oMtMtt oon liii« fiai qittlitfttiai «« 4iea»t« imd* ^ i»* 86(4) SM ontB tonotor a oo^oro* eoa lyaa t«a«t eor,<u9, noquoo«t in oovipovo at in vat* vid in ntro^ aoA iaaeio eoxs^oo«ot in ipoft* UMll«» oa^t S* ir* 46*)

^^^ 8>»«* do CMjot* . Op* 0it«» o%4* 6» p« 081i» mio olijootionrofon to eio toxt of ^iototlo, go Mta»* IX» i| 41Sft&»lG«od* Pit* * p» 79i mMmm i%aq«o msm ^Htoddam ^moo oorost<|tMio ooRt* ottlietantlaato aajw attt«R« aliod Qai4«m etout«at«yt«a« «imi omnidmi •• ttdtf«i nan oot iioo «ll<pid<ali^ atitom oiot&t fonwo «% flg^«»lo«i wtvaasOam Quaei dioit^irjOA IMMR *U<said* ot toitUa <pMi ex feio* list aatOR natOTiafitiUMNi potosUot 9sm\m auton cmleioohia* fl^io v««9r

Ayiotot«lian divitrtoa «a^ %• tmA la ttto aaoe fona in th«Po gotaara Bowjgjo of ir«H«ifw, ef* oi* clt« * oa^. 2» p« 96*

{86} mmm do Croat*, XI, q* 4» a l« ad 6» p* 3&a* ut* Albertfiiotoe Avtoonna diroot^ on Ihoao potrito* At tttio o^agoMioinn i» etill tw:;^ moh to ttxo fc»ro» of* Aficonno*l.i>* ifi ?ait* * f* I7ai £t ottiiuMmiaQtM yorfoolSHRflRRt«o««»tia ooj^asata p«r oo Ipoa oorlMe turn oit fotna G&t«rlat«noe In ofttwtAf fMno «l«iil« foao oot in aatori* oat foroair!$r«o*a in ixlft ot oHotooo proctor lllftt nioi fortee«nMiiMrif}t at pirfoolAo is»oe«l veootof Umm »;>M»i«l*

Page 412: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 413: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9U Aiwrl

19&

MQBAzetionft mi^MiM tit f««a»f e«i^sj»t4««« »«• Utttua

vftnAi alt prlaet^lm •ffloiiM «t vis mmaat 06 qur4)**

dOQttldm •!« cat, tins tmm 9i^tlet>% •o^pMMttoaM « «b»in»ti«ainMi «% Mtwtift etttetastlM qoM l»Mt mm >«r

nxm ct «« vw ^w»t« *««« •sattfcBtIa bftlwt «»b«%«m^

lp«a «»t» «t fta rem «iM i«M>pt«» ij^Mn wt ia PBt«nMii«

«t aA v«n Old sum Mi«>Mmitiit «etl9iiM qp»» ••* ofttttia*

MilM «Ktia ftorm ««t w iMitt rat^eetft, aQllieat* ^ood

hfttet M«« ia i»t<wl*« Partactio aaMoi «l«ainMt "

aaiAtlAaaa aa t«B parfaetas» ax <|^ anaaattl «iftft »atfaatto

wt tM9««ta apaaiai, CUnwi liritsr aat Qaa« otin in

dootrii* 4a aolf?« Aiaitojr «iod !»•» stt^••'••*»»_"f* ..

Dloa aignifiaat latiAlaetaA «t atteMi baa plat «a^i^ra«aB«»

aviaa ^atiaa aniiaaa aadiqoa. Far a raora ««^letaj»»

pUtaitian af twm *a* aatara, af« Ctej^tav Hi» » u a4»

(a9) atta.^Ct»»t« . 1^

ai dix««laoa «ti«a l|Hlli BHl» sst pw p^

aa&iai aat fSM at daotariaaa atttaaa

aAt patantlMi. W antan qa** iftveiil

•ant fnawartiwutaw a«itiw» at a9»r«t». ^ *«.

a«t«i fcabtt am « qoed habat virtatr t i>tlmm^affteiaodi. a«a i>»lneiFii«i tm»»Um^ ,^!?r^"*^«K hoo qai»4 !«*•* tn pertaatift ptlaol.-^ "^ ^fSjvfT9Hati»laia as«adi* »•• aalirt wmmi atM aa^a attrtlwl

Sam aliaa, id sat, at naisia ait pataetia oaiaa siaaa

•Itwtua* atea al ana fiiattor pa««^^iR ^rdi via, faltuD^

•tipirtaAra «rtiii»8«ftt ha^j^At l»< a^aiwoBUonia

noaiaia* ;*! sasfcaa ««« 4i«itari>c) ?int Bi|iil-

fia«9« oaaa tantaa «t aoo aUoA* J10& diSEiimft*

i^Tatiaa aignifiiiatla Htdm m tlci val tIo vjl Hrtaa

am a»PMfe«afil* aliMlat* aaaaati^ m^JJJ^

aaina aial «« ib» taataa pavtai '!*• «•*tinatian of aativa «n4 paaaiw po / -^^^

Al^art to Artatotla'a liatM«r ''^" ^la ia fiaak nil, cf. ^iototl • 1»

lCl46ai9«4t, in osera HUH i «•

i«rio, 1850, (Lata tfctiMil* ooi*

(30) f»i<^*

{zD I'ha alx»va aj^>»itlon ftiXlaea tha tact of «*• aU^ .„

Page 414: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 415: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

K« a« Mliltr 195

OC£Mt«i *«• 4, A* t, 3»l*» ]^« ^tak* ^« Bmm 4oolaria«

ttM#& tn tei«r«r fMhlon i« founA In aqau anwi* II* %»•

IS, «• 09, flb S» •« S» sA 6, IWU 93, £»• 161>» ^;e f mimOf St* Albwt |» tqaftUjT conelss ami eotwlsteat «a tbisAi«ti»etloa« ef* S« mlm lU ^« !>• «<^« ^* ^^* ^» 9* ^9^*Bt« AixUra aa^i0 didltoar Am^Uoit«r*»** Uu« Quidfn «aim«0t foraa 'dmatt «hmi dinvJlleittr i>«r wMUin JbftU1»ts qsilm^e«ati« In ea» atitijiwtOt ^ iU« ««t »io«t aelentla 4ai«»«MM la •el«Bt«» Alitm miXm mt sieitt o^ttatlo •Mcntia*lit |»r9ec<l«ni »b teijmiiidl m^ elGat Mtio vltM pn*•tOlt Alb aataftt «% Ul« Mt sloat eonsldvar** ^si>»A Mtaotio (Ml«iH» la ftttsi eoa«ld«rAnti«« Et iMUiltMttam ett

^nsA •aim t«t aetn* i^»l«w» tloot Mlmtla Mt MtM«ttl«Kllt« SBm «oq»e« of tht tmi^T portion of tl^o oelatto

la sott* «• Ctoat*, q* 4, ita 2, la Anooa». y.1>* irl ^t* .

^» I, ofl^t l, f* iv eol* 2i p«itf43imEBIiB «it dnolxis

aoAlof jHWfMtlo ixrlMA at p«rf«etl0 oooanSoi p«rfooUo•ttlM j^iiMk «ot propt«r VMn is>oolM nt ii^loo in «ffoetaoleixt ftsuftt OBOlsi {^orfaetlo MCton •mmAm «*t allqala

gK 1^0 Qttoo eoflMqpmtof' oi^oeloei Mdl» «at m mtlonilKui,Mt mt 99maMni.tKm «loat iaaldor* «9t «nsl| «t oleat

togHOBOora ot oagltwro at aaaUxa at mtoa toadlalt taaaa

aelai i^Lna daMo porfaatlanaa soasl ig^aalol, tea noa prloaa*•an anlR oA boa at i^aalea elt Id <|iiod aat In effaata fett1»«t

•poa ba^ora faoo la aCfaeto* ttad oaa balnant {orlnalplon

iHGMran la affaota Ita at baae ftoat la iM>t«atl«, ^aaa «»t«naa «r«nt aA in i<iOteRtlft alal la rmmim pot«a%to ^aoai^ at allona *U» taa piaataAat «a» qaoaatoa flat Ipaa

§i oartlaalaa potaatlat tuna aalnra flat aalaal In affaetai

aiK^ MtlM^ aat parfaetio piiaat*..

.^« Avloanm waa ^rlvlsig at, anA 3t* AllMVt «»a eartalnljr

IW£Wr to — lt» aaa that aj

pa»factio nuat ^ aUa to eziat

apavt fron aattar atan tho«<i^ ii ^a^a for a tlna tho ralaQf ^n*''^^ Coaaeqoastl^t «^1 autetaaoaa aaaAlag tba anaj^ anat alao te aUa to aadafe 1[(^ thaoNMiAvae* sbatla «. £m aaA aotltlajgr clUw tot a f)9Jr« oaanot poaalDly aslat

•iMurt fvoffi tiko aattar of lAiloh it la tha fo»«« Vhiatata^ ao, l^a Aaflnltion of the soul aa a gerfaetlo laavaa

fter tha aataUlah»< ••it aatetani*

tlallt?* Mt wfella ATle, .riatloa, oarfi^tla*

4oea not «l»a aa tawalal^a It la a eul>»

•taaaa. It doaa ftuastlor liatama afcaro*

aa fagia Aoaa not. ??ii!>/ lao a aab»ataaM for ^vl<$an ate tasctaaUjr

Page 416: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 417: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8u arm%

r» lir 9ol* 1* Ks toe atttfln q«od iW""

nBn «Mi» p«»fMtle fcurnft*

t^i gwii« *t eifi»t>. n» It «• * • it ^^ittUo, e ,-«

%«MB MdMnUtar id qeuA Mt «»ltti.c tons yo

art Am^cm no4i«» aelUott MwniHMi «•*«t *i« nm Aitfinittur ta aoMiMUKtisMMi ad .......

•aaoBAni WMUHumttaaits aid eoriMi* «t aie dUfiaitIMM »!• iunta dleittur iA aedUlava* qnia qiaaaaii ti

•oiaaa patwrt oanai4«g«tl «% Mac aiaa 909pmf» :

Olett Awitmmm la tI da gfc»agal;ilwui« «a9d feoo iioaj>

taijtts Mt at 4^«i «ittaB%la« neeAtaamnto is ^tw aiNa%intttiri •! avm iml^ dlf ,

ale«l dltflnlta «»% a1> iMatotali^ nan i^tUem- «ai«a aiai aaawdatt ^uA aat pirtettyiaii aaaaangi«jrfaatian«a» <rM* aM awt vhita Midi «« aast v ... oj

«% ale affttoatur aaaa ajaa «i tea qoad teWt <

maMiam toad «MMn aaaidaMi talat ad aarMf

;

ajtti aaaaattMi at wt attfaaaaaaflwa «iild ait* rt ..

Ailoaani atoll* diaaeat "T^aHaaala «»tm Jaa dlel m^,

4tw»d td taad a»f«to;r» aatoMM l»%«tt ta««n mr^ftl^tar id aasantiMt Dnjaa n»««Fta ^aid ait*^tandit ^vieannRt ^nad aleat m^or dt^Uattar d' tr,

aollidat panaa yti^alaiftaai lana ^uaa aat anftf

IMMiaa a«ian atatRtlaiit tte anSaa dc^Uaitw pel . ^

difftairit eellleet aaaaMhwi ^^asd fm% taaimp id aat«

aataa aav^aria aaalcita aawadan a^l^aaa ia j^ra«dla»»

MBt* aolctaaltaa* X% ia haij^fal aed ln%araati»e toaa^para ^« i^lbart'a t«t« «t«b that of i^vle«naa» !>ll>»yi

»>»• > F» %» aaj^lt £• lj>« aal* 3t««*i at lio^

TS&n) aat nonan baios ral tmt as aaia aoe «

ax pcMdiaaaanta i» <|tio aantt»at«ir i^taa« ttmm t

aaa afftfaaaa aftal aaaa tat qaaa eat ^inel^toa ei

diatnoa at afflmaiwia aaaa nft eae boa <!a04 hal^ <

aaatdana* Os^rtet aatee at ptar hoe aeeidesia ^toad iMltatt

iimartawni ad aartifUandaa eiaa aaaaattaa at ad at^pBa»*

aandaa foid Mlt« 9iwrtaaat« aalit tan dldtalama ^aad id^aad mtainaat bebat la^terai^ aaa %fmm prept«r hoe aeinasataaatiaa iMiaa aatovia ^aid alt«

{34} Saa. flMWl*» i'» II» tr« 1^» > m^ m* 2« a« 2» aol( vol*

9S« j^« lib.

Page 418: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 419: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

19$

C85I tWUU p« U^ It is to li« noUo«a t^At ^«In^ •%»?« «jM»t&ttoa is ft£fS»a»tiTe ^idmmiSpr«e€Qt t«K% of Aristottt it i« a n«^tive» ef«

£-0 Anima. II. 1* 413«S«9| el* cit« p« 8&i a^UiflnttOfw^xa oi sit oofporia fiotua asliaky tio^st

aafi«» n>tto« ttlM tte% Sa th« B^r^put oditior

ia iteotd«it&ll9 ««^Ue«a iQr i»tu«u Dho

on r«ed« eonroeU? lyi^ of* oy* eiti w?9^Bmi tZaaRQr t««A«

?f^/^tet/otie

oSTOo9*

(36) Xa osdor t» (soofliis tho iadieationo of tho ^«o- ^

tontto in i^« iUlbirt*« d«finltiim of tho oool Joito tho ooRiploto tost Avt^ofi in HdB oxaofo:

'

aol; i)« 15>-16«« DieonSim %uDd doflnitlo^Trinaofita, dloit quid oet miim oeoandon qsod «eS.

t»tm ot »|»oeioo ot soltetentU oidnttti oorj^rie, 2

•ooofldini loton ot ooeoadttm pftrteo operator <»p«?-'"'

fitaa* at Hon oat data da ania» aaamodiai f«od c

aai£«at piroptar quad otlaai Mloa^i^aMi dioit iU^a^saU poAlt iataa dafinittonaa* q<x>d aMondaa i^taaaaooadma fOM aat aotns covs^rls* aiioojtiag axtara qmanon asMreat apcva vitaot non Mt a^MCaUliai Qnia ai

aatMNHTator a ootvoro at aaaat is aa, aacuadiui iXiaa p«taaaaewflmi «iaM aat eorporia, mllaa luk^arat opaiattiattaa

vitaa* at sio non aaaat aaina* ttitata&tiAla aat aal«t

anieat^b oparatiofiM vitaa faaata* tlada I'hiioao^ltoa iH</»^

dieit aiat ** ;^iod quidan igitar aaa ait a^^asftUlia r

a eovporas aat ai aai>ftC&Uiia i»ura ^tmadea i^^aiaa

a»ta aat 8«s>wari» no" <"™^"*^«ati» aat* ooinv^'

aiua an^ianfla.

aian% nukttiy* aaata tunroa*'*

f*

ir..

o.

. WMU tt&K

<V>aB dieiQoa* OiMK

"-aaona aei

da^bat }mi

<«» fit

V

Uo tri

lad all

earporta <

''><ia*

'Ora atr!n*otei„ ..

}«ia ^dBgraioi

• iillA dafialtior'*a» %QOd B<i5>«r''',

'

j?taa Q«M»a nal^

Page 420: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 421: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

\ nniftAlbert

im

Tlt&« ^pomt'or in a«^Mkm Vwr «lu» nftatio*! ei/ile in

isMM sit aUq^Ofl ftMtw «;ptit«ttB«B S^san «s «m «Wttiftt«

siottt aaetri* qua mt c^pte •£ Ibcro at ^tiVQaUmt <w «ii iiq— iH

nwmli* ot t»« •Hm taalc«t v«f6tr« «» j^etfAftjUtoy iata•l^tltoAft* fiM«»v Mittt •! IMO «9«ltiMte aan mm% mm la

t^^) S9fimnmu lit IH» ^ ai* M» S» a« 2« ««• 10» tPOl« is»»

p« i71»t ^;ula iis^eoiUle Mt* (lood a satotanttft qhmt«it«i «tt Mt«8 eori)Ovi»» fXaat jpotantift iwmi ikiIUim

iNKqMHrts ««t ••%«•• eoai potcntta aatayalia float dteaMBtlftUlMtft aiitaMMottfiM lUliie oti^tui Mt j^taatti^

(3^) ^SSlJISSI^* ^^* ^'^* ^^* <i« fl9» a» 2, a* St «&• IC, ,>• 17al>»

mtMM ataMomls ItOffii the Giyi'sfi ..^lof^^a* vbl«lk «a hamMMMt at« otMf«« r^ni aafA tnaqjaiVMal* 'Stvv «v« ^E'von

«m^ioiMill7 •itay ana taAlapwtaUa t«Kta» fttrtiiary thtraia not ana «a««Rtiel tttoaat t/tum* tfaBigr diffw fraa tb«tasta «#' fwiwttfHKl i» tint tKrUw «rltiaga* ^%« «o»s« of0* l»ma aam a tit tea daeialva* ef• o« lottjUuliaewiotan gin. t in^Aiiattii da aa»3to ;ib rgjPWT^iiBia tiaia—B»> aaa la^gl. - -auu ^aoaag^wtpflwaJUMdla ABj^iwaa at awULe ^l^aiUal iW,Lota«feln, ^:<. I06t ia iSMM ' Iqoa d*Alb«rt le careae,

aaavra d*t«M vialllMse mm -' &tm finlta »»axv«f«lat> a i*hlat»ri«» l*Alb. it aatlitHt&%>M «t

daaa l,*«m(ireaa«iaa <km wtn 3«rv^e»

(89) Hare is %hm aae^la'^ twt adtraet statancnt an th» aoolt ilotar

ialttar agt s>a«« cori>©rt» ant aat^ ^ Sm^SMMA la j>art« corporia all^a&, nan ;i.r«u^i

aiaanftn ^SKtan j^Mrtaa nltUl i^vaidfec i* >>roi>t«r

tea qaed illae noUlaa ooitrorla aaat > vlat«<Ktg<tawt aatioatt^ aiaat i~ '?« '>"^, "^ arlt iaaafttaatttaa da lataUaotti %( at in

2>arta In pra«sl»ala hekHtiui «m

aat a»a 9Avn da Ijpaa iMurtc ,

fad da IjHHi toAm tata InttMnifeataai aojat eausa ae<

aalMM aint aatwalai pc^"^'

(ftavaaBltlla aat qiaod al)

Page 422: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 423: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

R* o« BiU«r £00

eox^^m quia onsls ^%«nHhmi K^vriot »9*m%tO%9a% vlrttts tafflrlor •« nm QQnv«ilt«ri muw08t, qts0d ft prU» »it^U<il qtd snactnt aabttanUft"^ ixitmt mtmoMjtm «««§» Uuit irivta* N»n«»

:9b tofis BoU* aMo iai^l«( opcgrftU^mis Mun (rt»toQMrpore* ? nihil •»% tooalitfir miAl* ntsi oora^us****.««ct ic^ ' ai» «» «<t4tt8 ei»B«»tift «fl|0fl«ata «rti, naant

gvMl' 0, et «•% vtrtttt in «osi>oi^ adLsttnst Ball«Aolt it« oit MpMft«»i mia ^tflmlte tatioftliB•t <^<^ Mr «M«BftiMM «t ^«| lj;>M p»t«til* tttStft

oofpo> lx(a QQia Si>«i «e8«itift a «aft fluit*AttuMB ^l^tntlft Mt psoi^rlttaf «M«iUft«»1^ ii i!>ttia piuwlcmis •% <Muiit tn 41fflnl«

oonjiv -^'^^ontiaai aatajMlitt eiq^aurfttaa?''" ^i' ti«U«e%iMi vst p«t«n«|ft M«N»

•9»«n«ift t»teUeotiva«

V .3 «t «M«int«ll«e^

Hailttcr r:

nant« oat i^

oovpor«l8*

.--)3«g

t^^ ^SSSLi&iSS&l,** ^2» t* 4» &• 4» «4» 1« TOl« 3&, p» 48ft1»t

It visa Avifttottleii aiclt, i»%fB»U vttoa to^witte. J^"^"""ka *»" ^^^''^^ «^i i^Mpwtan a»««dlft4 nil 'u^m mOmm

qoi MldiffiaitiosMB ad tirTT"^

A mim ?lft%mlift>«» i^attur in

l«j>ld«i. ?^d6 1« la mnmt to «a oig««tl»a . A ifS«M»ia0 on tills iiwMo of AHototlo (Grogor^r iar s«« Altert)t}«%i the oool lo «bt Mt of eto tt oottl. cf« caroiBMry of gric.HoiAiilSy oa« eltTTw^pW^Tprilt!!

~

oor$«s DOtootete ^Itoa liAtNtBro ot eonloA* rioit onltt oos^^do i>et«otii(t

i9«»« Oportot «ni«n mrgvm, qi:<.

'xiatlttg: la i^trn^

••enoTftto Oit^>«»o in 00

Page 424: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 425: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Stl

'i, uiiut

StiuM meta ««« eoiP|f«i»« lien »•*«•* •«*• attt* •«»,«fg*»fait««MI MM^U^ «»«»l«l» ^l* <BiB «>^ ^^iM quAlltftttt

«t nee cort^u*. XHt»w««»Ue er«o «rt quo* aon ett •*!*»

P9t«etot« H*«3 haHir* in •• SjM P^^f^ ait» le *••^mH «hUli St. Alt^it »i|>»o<tiiB«i» ewseiit for R f«• mlmr

varl6tl<n»* In tSx9 o^eeUen he ftit«>*

«4X) oa. olU » ad Sj ^. 481» «d ftXlafi 41certJi». Qood ttt» •«%

CTMelott* soteBttM wtlvM* tt eorporla elcut paesltae.

148) •Oil «4t*» •• »• ColttUd an£ ad I) p» Met io««dw eeeeadaiB

IHSBiaL <woJ wil« eet perfeetlo prta* cor^rio i«tajp«lle

ia»tw»e«Ulle bftljentle ^«m Tlte*. t BgoyKtoa hyac

iiftialUmm ereexdetm ert pwe difflnitlanle, «» taett«««o-

tale et oigeiiieeB aeeipltisr jpro ttoa«!9.«-<t«a«n 1^- potgatl&

Ss^sararmtaMa diciti i* s^sssasa «^/*«"j'K*^**"'•A potentlee maUM, ?»»• epewmttup m »«s«9nl»i e«4 ly

,^t^tt* Ylfaan hft^eae dieit tenpeo^wi eeri«»rie wl ipeiwa

gjL,. ^4^ JUmi netm aateae s«e«adW8 ee.... iwf

Avleenne eft iAI>. ?i 'fit. . ed# elt.. 3v col. Ss

a'

i"'

V.^"~T^/ ^^ ^0 *o ^ ^*** ^:4v-t'

••• l!ieor^>oi>e6ixi r««Mt «iio«Fe

in oarperr ortelle «iiiiifte iat«lU««att«a

teMe F^»»tofl* W3 irrttttoufcUleffl.

(44) ^oc 5heel#. • ®» 2» *• ^» «i«i U i?» i6*»

«tta eet «wlei««.... .^-. ..r.i-.ntian«t qxam f«lt eespori

9«t e»e« tltee. In e« «u «»t l»conor^as»

M<ver« viT«tB» at dielt ii: <«•

(40) saa. aiW>l >» loc. clt., Rd 3, p. I6bi

U«) Sua, d« creftt. . li. ir« l» Q^ ^. «• '• !?^« ?^ *? St.Tko cl»eeei Wrtea wwiel of this dofinltion In /.rtototle

!• In II r^e /«la», 2, 415W» S»t tt«t«i eaii» nwatio

Page 426: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 427: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1* a* xiUur o/vi

ootjfOHB t»wm •% j^lMtj^idii*

a* 19a« IBp* IVa« In «b[l0 a«M plae« ;;t« ^l»«r% sft^nM ^*m od^tfttmiiuti odT tte dtfiaiUan la ^vmUom (a) aiOm «itp»ineljpt«» tt efttuM opevwR vita* «% £>«r «« ekooiacntlaii

la t9t» tt in pArUiMM, «f• p* :^i»* atatvansVfdlffw«Att t^M BMnrMt T«rlficatl(« ^i^lstottt jri«l(i8 is

t0 Imi t9^mA ta D« i^ilm ZX, 8, 4]L9bUt itaa» •«!€» Ifi»

t«Bttan d|«t«n vtt ^lov, <ia»d Mt 8«|im bnnaB qoM diet* wast,glnolj;iluB9 «t hit <l«t«natnii>1ni est, v«iB«tetlfO, eensitivo,t«U«e%ivo, tt iKit«) And ' '

> 414a IS} Aolbm &at«ei hoe^(00 TivlcKW «t G«iti OS «t r «% InteUlstn** ifHm»Tvo faeto are %o b« aot^v .^ of ttta Oiaoaasion*(t) ut« i4%«rt eMBtloM -h <»f t4a 4«fintti»iis«iurititotle tet ao acatlii: tii«M last tm£^lr4tl4M ettad*(2) ^t» Albert elt«s, withmit «atnttratia«, the '*«9nca oflife''* ityietotle, in mtlh of theee stated aeeflalttoae,ettoavratee tite fc. /ana the oedee af Uviiv; ef iddchtM seal is a ^orliA.^.^t.e« In c^- - -^t»>a tdltb ii*lstotltt*8

flMQtioB of intelleot '^t^ &Xles jjrfl^ardl of it Istl:jro«B iato rolief*

i4iy »mt„^^_r^t^*$ II, q* 4, a* ?, p» 00W sft» Alt«rt adoptstSle

^'frora &Hstotle, cf, II iiiyeleorsea 19da

i4S] Oiu olt» , eol*, a* 68lNr Dteenrtiia, qastf in SMd aatcura treeecmaae eoiaeidtmt in laMMii, eieut eieit i^etotfAes laZI iVsiooiftia, effteieae, I^Uialie et foraa* l^oe aiKt4B

law ineiaere in ttasa, am qtiD<s xaedua oaiMMlitatts eit QBtis,

sad ^dia uaa res quae «»t foras, dlveveli ratloail^tts et60Mii4«ratioai1»ts eit Keraa effleleas et llnalisi effieieaeaaten aoA est forna {feamaa): <icl« sic effle^et teipsea,seA Mt effieieae esee era[^siti et oo&^i^isitioaee eoase*fiMntos Msot sea eeae eeq^eiti effiolt p«r eidjMMw

(&0) Xa I Seateatjejmwu mat* ^l, a* 1."!, b& 3, vol. 2C, p. fi28%i

—•set f^sraa saiietaatlalie oatoseuiiuKiae euioe aottas estrea ia ee tenalaare et eeiMMwre ab allis in Qailtiss aim setesAea fsraa aoneea per aetaat «r^ fttraae illiiur, soilieetaetoB qoi c -liawe ' ^llie dlvlaere, feeit

Page 428: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 429: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St. AXt«rt

*--*,gieol 1»la<p to «lnft ft

(53} Qg. cit> . ot»4s I una «» i>» 6^»

CM) oa, qjt. . cii 1 et . , v« 69ftt>«-^?rlianB «t j^laclpttim •a»t

hSm «t pro^>ter boo prlnoi^lw aoa ««®ooit blc cwioa*,

sea eonfllftloiiom «o«ooo 4000 oonciitto eot prtaotjpMW ••••

•t i>r^laa psoxiofosi olw laaodlfttaii, oftooft tow oo^aMf«fnaoriMB* offlcUnt wro ooooo<k» wtianom mam o«a»all-

t»tl« oolum 8lo oaawi iwrt ot a«m oot ««»•»«••

(05) lAbeg H r« /Jdm> t)p. I, OOP. S, voU D, Pj - '3t l»oo aon

poiooi fiori iSoitolt Aifflnitloao wHaM Infmrn^^odioftt oaoofltt ^»6te «oi««o »lt eotaa eoifporlos hoo ««««•«

«rlt rt ooo^orl^-^o oosonAott* Qttailtl«t parUa oxoaoe*

Q i>d luoft OBt rlroiplam ot ooaos teo4w» »**»• <?5« oxorooWr

r . hwl, 11, tr, 12. U* 68. a. 2, «• 5* ml* ix>. *)• iS-W-

'^ aaWtMiU&ito^; text of tli4» loot dlscaool^a i« «»»^ .

fOllovoi «t aieti taod lo*o« dofiaitlonoo aim aioaat nlol

tmiiL oot antm. ot Aon dlca»l pro^tior <iaifi ^itMiUa «« %ool«o» ot idflo tm^otfteto oun '^

aM oontin^t eogaooooro ottoooo owi&mU\x^

op«witlonaa qaiMft por 00 o^ivoalv^ oatF^

fttfiaitloal^oo gmoralltor dlolt In ^-^

fMiU twnifootota oot do ols, ^^]0<l ^

taafto oian««i q^iia pot ooo m^ c-

«ot miwu oa» ^ot OM flon eo -: ^QQAO noKlMMi pwrNwi ooafoOTOtt «*•

V'lt «Bia« <pod o«ot Aofinlt

at prlncli * " ^* coitooo, qoat ^Q»

pl»y»tol © ^.«tU tit ^«»

4it mod 08>-' K'-i-o-^ wi'Mitailtlft —

Page 430: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 431: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

^SSmi^^imvm m^ m% mmim «* »*l«f acta.

eR 8«eanfiA eies

156) Ot. Mbcrt. .kva. .lw»U s H. *»• 12# «i» ^» *»i» *! *• *^ J?*

169) at. AH»w^»> oi>. cHi., i). lOBt). ?i»« t«rt la jaaud to mia

4finrSKi.. «i. olt«. »• 8t o«wl6 «at» A«M9iifct»fiW3nia

A^iaitiafta* mn eonMiigit -^f**^ !?!!!E2ri*^M«pa aonjaotnmci «• !»•!• ft«ll»» aenl^«»*tt« «»* V«»»

dialaoUea diotaa awit at woaa aoeaa*

(60) of. nataa 49* &U w^ ^^

aSSwSRw IntoaSo «tfftolUaa« par «• ^P»«

dlolt WMia«» aittfl, alca* AladiMa In «Ke«^»# ff«»twlwtAB ladneto. s^^ SbmU m Xl» tf» la, q« l«, •• 2, *• •#

Jr3^^olt^a5fgS'a«J daflatU2;«»ut concluat«»aa.

It mn ttt priaalpiaa at aatiaaa, n^M f?"!.!"*!^.^-^?^

aat prl«cl*lm at eaoaa opawa Tltaa at P«J« "^^^J^

in lill aorpara, «Udl aaaaaia ^<«?*«f ^eSJ^S^ •f**^**«t »aUo at ««%tta taUa aaxporla qaaC haWt patitiMaa

vitaa 0wi9xAm aa at aaaandwi partaai

(62) er« nota 47*

(63) SUB. 5haoU, tr. IS. «• »f «. «. •• »• '^ ^V'%J^'uam rationalta aaauaAam ^»aflaiB p««taa tm& ^<»^f^^aipltn, naa oaaa* aat eari^ri opama witaa at aaalAaatlm

Page 432: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 433: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

olioajas eoipoviSy MA 6«!pAX«tft ftt al> l^o«

(04) San* g^l«. II, tr« 12, q« ^, «• -, -•• ..., f»l» ;s^, ^. i9t^

(66) of. (1) In I Gm^mm X>l«t» HI« H *• S» 1» Wl» ftS, p* 9tei

01 forte ''"' ^£, q9oA f»slt» xationalis p®r (seoidcna iw*

in oocpo: : licet, at in Ifoo aMi^lat «oiiBtl«s et

vlrtatM* »o« nihil Mtt ^aia eeeidcns nm «8t f»ieasutetaatiftUo ewseoeitlt enhaa aatm Mti<»iaUt fanm0«Astra;eialiB ««t hiMdnltt eajtw psn Mktcriftlls esto>cpas« (2) 03« cit« > rlst* nil, P«» ^t* 26, ^» ^%t'"Otm dioisuft qiosA anioft rat fofsMi ttt%0tiintiGliB tells««ffpoHc, eetlleet phisrsici «>otentia Tltee h&t!«ati«i

(3) ^ >• II» tr. n, q» 9, sol*, vol# 32, p. I40bt

i'&e iL^ qvioa ipsft (cmlRtGi} mt actus eox'^orio

•rflKOlei i potootiaa vitae 2iab«ntta, n !»q asm•0t p«r t4wta% at q^aimm «axann%, mA 9«e«M4Btl».< ' »«<") nisi Mtrintlftlia fttrna. «it»«t

tuOKlldtl, KNBOt

^^^^qfy

<^» Cr«5t« , 1, -i, ., ^« 30, «• 2, foU 34# P» 6CK»"

cliff«««ntia afiisftS (#t Aagdi) 4wt, cuotl i?

eofsMxri, nan at fkumi tautur a, sad

at fcamt •* •a'Nitaatia aove:,-. ..- ,. ,-., .--.._ ~- -- :mutii

aavcss*

(68) oy» g^t* . II, q« 4, &• 1, aoU, vol« ^, p* ;M£i:^ .^latiot

inlMlis

HettSSi qao4 etaj^m dttettoinft^iii eat da angelia (ef« nata 67),

q;: staotialia difr«f«Rtla saSna* at an^li att in Ii8«

41:— .^jjm laeliimtar ad eorpoa at Mrtasi^ angeloa aataanoiu It idao aabat«mtial« uloi :tia axiimaesaa* (im& aitaetiis cor,>orie. cf, M^^ffitfj -^ Ij U ^t piA^lval* a?, p« ^91>f sd olloa aie«»ltti&, ^aoa uolo tttnuWea^ar Dfitarom {miauai qoia ipaa mttaralitar 44«ianftat

afi eov9«s»«»«

Motio. mAw&m^ tgixA tatimt va^tntalla at aastliMt tt

i^aeia, at &Kmn fliffaront, T^t aaln aaaiaalia anteaiBtaadana In aalaetaHli* oor^forlos et aie <Slff«rt

gttiava, /mgalaa atitaa i^iritaa, at ua <Mlaet6Hli6

Page 434: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 435: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B%t Albert

affwtaB «t tnt«ii*l<m«B rvttnet eft cori^««, in ta«tan 90a

litM XII tn^^r Oinealm «d iii%«tin» Io^mm &• •» »

rftntft B 0«uii%a8 ©or^^rle, «t <i« »tota po«t aort«a ei«

dlelt* '»!••* aalM»« aoiOM mtasAUs •9j?«%itiw *|»^

»» teto 4nt«n%li>B» p«r»B« in Ulad wwawB ooclura, in-

t«U«otu<ai8 sc :t«i|pUtlattl»» qwwlitt wa «*«"cor;aa, ejijtis U«n» i8)jMrti*M 1U« Q«l««»t,''

*4*i,.- . :.ij« aft ritttfaeten liJCR^JtOdtiMliw

*•

^^ 7C8...9i««t bOM mtOlott

tfg) !)• Ciyitef £^ xlll» a*, ll« J. *.. 41. eaX. 339i QOwHaa

teas non «8Fc^i,>u» oolii»» v^l a«i«tt «olfl, m4 ^ M«Btna oonrtat «t owpovv* vf* Jc mrifa>a colosiae. U

(1P4} Do OfgUMil ed TAttcgaa, Vlt, SB* 3C, i^, U S4» col. 3C»«

Page 436: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 437: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&«• Al1)«rt

iSd^eii.» iHTm; 86. . • U 34, «!• »60. For «!•

«9k«mti(m 9f st« Aagtt«tin«*0 rei^nBtli&tloii of tho

•TCRliaa of «J« oottl fxA «» boay mA - " rotation

of ooaooiB on thlc point ©f• sttt»i tc^f^^^^o"

iWome* Jtli erto# mn, IWl, i> "" "•

(76) Do r.<EU aa 1.1tt« . vH, ^» 36, i', !«• iS4» ooi. 369 1 Uloqal!ppo iU»ilcS?io TOluBtatlo •«; - - " " ad ost »oUovol jnotltiM TOl iniqtdtfttio ^ ^MmOB. oot

in Joaiola i «l# 2£j_il*»» ®*^» ^^* "*• ^» *"*^* '^*Sod 01 flA hoe fit aolM* ttt cdttotttr In oov£»a0, qoMrlpotoot «towa» 01 aoitttttt* ooiv«iUt«av* Md mU«»eredltor boo aotiinaitor vollo, ia oot. In oo mtaroorooH ofe voUt* oloiit notoxole noUo «o« voUo vlvwe*

of. atiwao gjloon, op# fU>> »• fi*-«& ««» i^« TO.

(77J of. M^Bg^ op. cU. . J?. 86-09.

(78) of. noto 99.

(79) of* aoto S8»

(eoj aft. aaaMBC. 1 a—wo ghwiogtoa. 9. 7e» o. 1» o. 3%. I&oaoo"""

- """^^STcoTaSTof at. Ailwt foid MTmo tbo

jjMB|' li

^ ^^«•• ooaitiar«ith ids) Wmmo of £)t« Alport's J^nor di<i St. MteTt oboy«o hlo Tliov lioooooo of 1^^^MjkMioiloeu wo Bd^t ovoa ouapiot ttet at. ^I^tiSliil nnwffffl'ir'' on thlo fOlAt tooomo of tbo agm^oolofileo of I't. 'i?b9«!w. St. Shoaipo ooiyoood tbo fJ

Mtfiof Uo 2»i«BB&^'-^''^ -'-a fioa U61HU2««. of. Jln^.-^^'^

oaft Ptmw. am awi^to. (Miaiothoq«r^W«w; i)

(81) ^, fhw^. op. Pit. . 04 4i

Atttn&tnAom oot oat«i» «aod boo Mravlom ^wA hlo in&«elt(V,

Page 438: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

•]

Page 439: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B* 8, HlUey gi^8«« Al%«rt

ali^uld^ aoilieet qanstan nA too qjatiXL d«Hon»^«tvara«natUo Mitafte nm attlw qpiMitBM HA lio« qvftCi 6«apo»

positan {l)» «»do pxntdioto aollievt pur 9ttmfam» El

•M Md» «Bt i;»rifla9 £»irlnel^itm iriYtsxtl his Qaa« TiintBtt

Xk 00 maUn q^o4 aniaft Mt f»n» (mrporio vltc^tle^ «et

—itwrj i« datid atioat 1266* ef« iaaiflaiiftet -3t>Mi,

^^a- to 11 w«it» . 2, M, ii. I, o. 1, c.; :.^

*aa» <i«>a ftotafc mtionslls prnr:'cr ; 11? 3

Qola aaliaft ;^t««t uui»licit« cotmk&vtajti^ aelliettftflBOAtaii aood Mi% iiilntiiiitta tft aaaoBidflii MMd iBt fiUHML^

Mm mt iBMLlismSum ymntm tA divcamn fiiM la t^M •<»%»quasi alieifi »it ftsasntitt aua «t aiiod i^jsacs aasa fosBMi «%•ia «••• {lafMtt MViSat aild aioot ealor oMjptMrti aoAdiatlaaUa miMl^itax aaaudini «J«i Aivataaai aMidtdMwttaawtQon aola aac boa qaod aat fanaa haMt <saad pcwt oarptw ranmaQt*aad « too ^a»A totot oaao «toiiiti«% at aiMMrlMiUa •«>•aiat«wi tioat atttts toao a«tt totot ^pa4 latirtlisftt «ie

too ^p«>4 af% «Bi»al» a«i ax toe qnod aat ratidaelis^ qaan-it ttlvoMtto ait ailii aatwttaia* Vtm dwitotayy an tbaSantaaaaa dataa fvan lflHNU06* «f« .Tlli..iiftiiiitl awA. Ptatraoop« oit*« p« xv« 'xliia «aa arittan adHrfffiRMryMHRr''''''^

1953, p« 4S» t am in iiom£>iata aj|jMMn«at

.'',4» < '>'»<»*'i*ii*» ?• l^i yojwrdtng bio a«»"*""

"'- •' i^le-Aa-saatittlaa titox««t«r af at#lia|)ari^ of 3%m Altort's

n in tiiia pnl&Wmuia af St* Altort «

!Aa 1 rc»l la^ftt Fatbav a* ti,

• xei ' ~~ ia hia atatoamrttt '*AiBai»

Page 440: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 441: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

HCg»

Oans l«t i»oaoliMd<mt U»tf»U«B«it |«1m»» a» Mlurt ••

pfirtl«r-»-Tig-eHfle d« «• ^•o« faowsl* ftS!P«l«« l**a«»»-'

M imolA not tiAV* vvltUn this mA he at«aoiMa tb« pto*

|«n In %li« mdy wmiw which «oe« no vlol«j»« %» ts*

hlatortota •stMfidttit* »tol«h »liBi»«l »*• Al1ii»t»a tluiu^t*

In spit* of the f«ot «to« v« S«i^tr Iim lata <tom «&

Mfttortoal oo!Wltt0i»n It Is only after h« has filoawwffl

«fl^ l«t«atloo of lj«»»tla»tln^st» AlbwptU dsflaltlon la

relation ta Ita hlaterioal iMftiBgromMs nana t» Yiaaas

paa a iantlar leo ooorants teetrlnwix <ial ont Ins. ire

la i»«ti«<u> M^avtintama at a Mntatnitra la ««aaa« da

eatta patiaaa ai altooaaitta at si Hdhmmt tfoaaMnt9«»

Page 442: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 443: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

iOflB fO ei: f@'0

$m 4i9A* vi)SX« ao% •terlctl;;' iHtC same In texainoXosy %hl»o1»J«etion reoi!ai0 one of tham ^iUinm of /u.wz':;n« £i4v(»io«i

a«l»|iuit sn a^«Rt iziteUwt* It is qoite j«o66ble 2%* /^%«rlt

liaft srilUoBi ^ .M»r«r^3a«*« nation of an «l^si^ ln.t«U«et inatnia« Hllie^ of AWOi^sm «m liocn &% Aartll&e, boosiso

^mfoMior of t^oliOgar *t B&ris cuid «m Btctop of . erte la1SS8. So diod i» Ult, of« golxwwi^Staror. oraBflytso, tilth

Odl«, levUil, 1988,} p« SU^Q^SRnSinnr t|],li«is S,» «•foliovft 3i Intor o«Btnui •% a«nii%tll« am o»% aooow««i»•OMMttft MntlHllA, ^ttA* potonliiA oont la ocfpoio tmmsm^fftlro tn offoetoBi, «t •» omo in offoetet ood eA boa•offioiont o«ruil1»Uiii ^omi ok^m omftf ^HOoodo aon Bainrie«>

twit InltoUoglliiliA «d Uf^fHmtaAtm oi^Ultodineo stuio i»»tolli;lMlett in inteUoBtcud antoyi&lon? St at olorioii boodioatuvi ateut eon «et amamm o@om, at tta diOfitnr,

iBtcv omoiMlta ot inmurmi, noAiao, it» nm eot me«oo« atatt intelleetuo &ijerui intor istftUiGit}i}i& et intelleotaiWfttorlfllim, 1^ 6tteado Oills^tor qjitoa oooipevetto lotAWMironiflntioiileatt eot* ^hukio iaili% ed a»Atw) intollosi^io

«ftto»iell8, eot p9t4»tia hfi1>«aB fisfnoo s«uiiUl«8 oivoOti^littidinoe ««vi», ^.*»-,,;, v,,.„« tnteUoetus raeterialle

;potintlA toatam #iH» ^; 3 Intelll^Mleo ekveitellttafliooo* ai . avQgs^gaoii Jjq j^ateft* ooi^^ 7,

torn 4, »p«r« Oi. .--- -'"v "«; ^mn^T^t^. S07.

Joint Mtiw»^m!^f;7- -" - - tnTf'f, mk% L Thlo

•ofa wmT iwt <-- - >-. ••^^, cf, ]llao«» or'* elt* * p.fl^J*

^®^ S|i»a» 'c >eftt» » il;i<i» ad I, _

'

,

(4) Ofly ei^» . ^ . • 4Mbt ^M> twct of Ariatotlo«M,ei-; ::t, ^l \ij Is to k« fooad 1» tho Do .^jalm

III, 0, <"/. Pit, , pt 839 s v^trniloa ontoM olottt

m -^^^ - ""-'^'ili, boo tjuldoa aatorlei oaiealQiio

gr" ontia onaio,illA, altt^ron Autoo0»& ':>«i«nfiio oenitt, at ar« ndAt ., ...... ^ <a oatoft ttto 0000 <liff«y«Btifto«

St '

io liic <iiv lie in onniA fiovi, illo^ r% oic too qttidMH, et siout losim*

Page 444: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 445: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

t. 0* mum

of• ChBi>%«r 6» B* '1^-^'

t0» q:s> Pit, . a»l., ». 46«)«

'" arLii;»Biaret. ijf.i*^'- ring's:!

i«»Mll»Ui t9* lift «d iiiAiW wfc^arw »««««*••-!»Jf..,,^

XTetVagMifli ft mooAvt <iofl4 tot iiie«g»wjj» Jl*

S^[^ «f. ^« %«it »f A»i«*att« <a^toa in not* 4 jgj^fg.

acta tactua* VMMitoa ««*« •*««* »«**

t^ osww prl'^'a qivA t»t *»4lWi ««fW •^^^

(10}

(U'

3

Page 446: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 447: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B* 0* HtUiV S^

Lot* «t itttftHeg^t ed«.i,iMmi±mtKmiimjm^**i5r la Jtmwwar to -^^iiw^^ _,

UiUlot^^ fMaUl** Till, E6ia» 1^6* p* 7«fi«S*

"!<« 'izsMSOtcata?'xr,r^

wtja

A* ilWt's i?WPpo»» in wAting it ef»

JNuris, Vrin, 1929, »• U^^iM* i^ fiJ5jmS

I

(IS) Mioit*t 9* fiOl^* Ma oaia mlm m wivortittilKW oonlaK

fSwvTtar tA ptimm» om ia ^aftiibot wOa* «bm mbim*Mt tM« pHmm in QM fit otftttts Uliaa oxdiaiat ««

haoe Mt eawHtg q»a in Utett !>• J>^ AtMUm in I^Mt

«Bin» ••»• (tuM 4ilt«r«i«iM itaiv«Maiit«r itc;«»Uo 9W«•« MBia fMera* •% taoiivoisftllter i^ooeiUlla q«» t«t

OMli« ncri.t«*«IKtt tftlMH MMMit la i»»i» tiiiaftteo MMintoUitttia «9««t»s witv«mt»^ wmwm intoltoetwiion

9Mpmrti»Mt«M»

()8} o»« ttitt . litw «aUi )»a» Ma p«f«etii ctMt aiM» mmm.••«! ^imo tmm immnmlm^iatim teit «•«• «Mi« ^r«s«« iMlM«^ift1tar« i«e«n4iiis to Ifaotj ia HiSSSKSrMiM fit mitoo aUdiort gay lo lAfM ap Ift

"gv-'gaeie.

A^g XXI), ^arid. Vrta* tMi8t p* i9»»f nato

oS mm tm & mioxoM »««m %• iMto arriT«a c^^

««»tu»3r %7 «»o« iAftmtmA tmmmtU) 9y tlio ^OMR dr&i»uria of ^Oftfyla ^tmt)o: rsom qoI

«»nHBi«nt«9 l»%«t eaa ooai «r«fttttift» V i* U IVi, eol* UflVS

mA iMl*. ^# U U4, eol* 4930*

(%) "M»«btly «»»»# Itoo t«g» of aalnt Gr<^?o»y, ga^ipgla mrni^t Wi» tt, Hoiu 8§» I • U ^» ool* 1£:U« no. 2»

aod, MBit <Hro«:tax«o aMii»« tisixtatiic tmom»*om^» aat«a (»r«ataxftO

ali4at« lAbot MM* aft)»o« WM^* oensaafi «••« ow loi^iOili^

TivoM oan ai^vilMB* oontivo ooa antaedi^oo, iatoUifiare

•» OngOliO* a OX^ OOMBMBO DftlWt «llQ(tM tiUBI OORd

•vfftton MMf i«rtft *U«aiA OMio ovcoteva mt kmmm '^liio

itftMt fxoa tite %ms^ of 3Ria« ilntt sn« Ifti Kiaitoo ia

anivwoum* pnuoieato otaogptlian ooni oroatorao*

Page 448: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 449: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B» S* IttlltV

St. Aittrtia2

(o) Xt le t9 iMi vm4 in tiM SoUtifAns Uast ef 4»tH««|««-.l-f,^-*-*

:n.anm8 flag» ga eS^ t4»

IfttlfiA* vol* ^» idiris,

ftfffo aamiJUi fi%» •«&&» In

XI,

(5 .fiuassif'tfr-se^o , ^

' ^.

«« Oo

Page 450: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 451: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»al cot ^x>osif;Uc et Qon'--. »,,t hoc aa^i- . 'A-r: or;-'

quod ad ?5liili extra a© vc,- . -i 8« batet Ce. .-.a -...^.i.xj

MettB^ata esse* ifel* wrk «m vrinia aWat 1270, eC*

£tt&BS^ iSgl^o|t«t i^* 6* In 99mff99kas It «««• Al.l»*rt follOMlnRraTtsMtiAtlon of «a ijmMfta «MEk itoiM tor a«rM$ «rGwmmm im^^m 1167-1187 ftt ^l«do« of* itittt d> c^atc,

ftserilM9 it to a eortoin 3m ^ bmm £«fia, (oi^» eit*» U,1« 1* j^* 4SSb)0 '2f lUotlty <»f this AAVid hM mt MtatfHAteilotioil* aaiAMtfiwui »ij«ot« »t« Mbtrt*o Atorlptloat» fiwrla fto «^ «i 1l« Into AtaWiim InftwwKHMi ^Ai«bfit* Mttrt asorlbes to tho «ork« (JtMl* )* ^® Sltntoto•f ttmUHSr 9£ irt^tkmt (4I1«40&) itthii «Bla mhioo of t^iwriB Mgro SM>d«Ayo*«»« «nd h« o4tfo itet a e«rtala aoovof ««tho aatbOMhlj^ ie to far oat poaiM.Ue« of« qj» cit« > etU

SacdotfMNNHPf p* 00*

t^^^ ^SSiL^SS^f ^* ^* ^*^* '^^^ *'^^* ^'^* ^» ^* ^ ^^*1 3)0 caaola at ^ ,

w» Utaty<r# t». 1, q(^>. 9, p. 370V-

(17) Ttmn la ao doaVI tfaat «Ua iliraM laoaaa GM ftur st« Mtwrtat loaat la tbla proaoat Aiooaaaloiii af» J^aa>^l»aU . X»

!;», 54, TOl« ai, p* 50SI^ «>« clt, , 12, I, Q.l, ofi olsj. 2,

vol* 32, p« l^t 14b« XI *5ota, tr» 2, eap* ?, vol. G, p*6Sa««

(19) Ufc> 1 m Caoala at ^too« ttBlvay# . %tm 4, aa»« 8, p« 488a%i

siipgpittiau atsaa «a»<l lirtalloetSBi onlvwialitor agon* aoaai^t tt aoBotitait wm atal aativa tatalUe«Baa» atistaUletntiaa «dttaa4o« at dun tea aoda latalli^t,atipao r«i aooatitutt, ad ««taa Iqbmii aoi tAtellaotostaaninatiir* Dm. wrga prtans intaUaettia a^tma koe oodaint^lt«tt ae, lamn IntolUgmtlaa taa4 aat al> Ipaa,prlaa fwm aat at jtrlaa aoliatwitia hatKiBa fOfwai ia*talU^antia la oard^aa*

(SO) 9i>m oit». p« iSBIta itaattraa in boo quad ak alio oatt^S^^uaaa babat aaaipamtimMM* aaiUaal «4 primm i»»

t«Uaetan a qaa aat, at ad aaipaan eaottmiaa id ^^lad

ait at ad tea qted la pattotto aat aootmnttm tea ^gfuA

m nihUa ooti astatfiaB tnin aaaat, in ^tontia «attquid OMoa QMd at alia aat, £Mt«n aot, at la potantia

Page 452: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 453: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»•>§> «•• aiti tmiwHwi «ao(l •• tttMUi^t ft jgiMfttttilX«»tft «•••• Itmmittm Mft«B qi»« tafceUli^it —tjiiMMMlam lA qxuaA mt, oeoooUt in m Xmmx latoUeotsuiprtBd» %v)0 loA^liiit M • &>via» lBt«U«ote« wmmi «t8lo iiM«t8« oit ««oA inftclor «tntlliMHM> meA l^aai tt

Id (i«od In oe«lii mt 1m» ludaMl* swnnlHi aaMM 9mAintf&Uglt «e «B aiUlo •• •% In p0t«rtt* fk^aM. nmmm

•I Dtm Mt Mt nUwiR »»li«tMt tmnm^ vmtt cH MtmrlA«trD»rie flaia«Bt&it V^ foeator s»Uit pfJUnB*

$nmi9ii fldBl la pHam t]vteUi8«alslaa •« Wi'fcwtt^{OlA «MHB0tKt <iaDa e««»Mw>tlQ isiBitnis IHnas vtfMrteur•A IfgUmtt «% Am rt« i»l«ill3it ••« PV VMitiS i»tt«Mn•aBatttoit iBl«ill0«itlMi mmmOi ovUnttt boa atlMiint«lll^t ae mmn/im Sd qf&od m% «t sle oonstlttiit

in 9«%tvlia ct attf ttonatitelt m»H1« mmurtiwi tfoM «•%saeofidiia ooaloa* Xnt«llle«M enta ee aol^tva tntcll«eta«

at ale iM^bataa tsUellli^antta asmnda at aMruBfl iM aataraaeoMna oaUXa*

^^^ yg? att« . p« 4Sli^ »k IMM aate aoa aat difrioUa(lataiminMra i»baUi4(aalAaa at aat«r«a at oaaloa r«8qa&ad aaalan lfmBa»»«* JSt da^Uaan qpteara taaaa^ ttataat aa%af tnferiay par awnlmmtliiin datarataatiarvagmlmin par trioUo«a Int^laotna.*** Ioat int^Ui^aatiaamaAtm 9tAA» laaaa at Ijpaaa m^»«b iMHa» " «iBt Istalli^Btia«>Mi iUaatittt aaiMV mttewaa aatiaiawt al pa«Plv«mn,aajoa Itnani diffondlt In ectltrla at pasalvio, <

antiwa howttww iUttataat» at aajtut vittaa aaao^' aaataflM tfwaiatafMi at aattapttraA* «t» M^-.ln8|>lmtt<Mie in £)Mpoain^ thia XMrt of ^aaaiMailat^ligaaoaa mi thaia tf(»&a ralation ava Aai<

ilflaaal* WU9 hm daaa not eita thae in tbia t

iM&t to tam ta tha aap» da Create . XX« q» &&* a* a^ oo^« 6US ana to tata aM> Ihaal*.

qt* I0» aol«» vol. aK^ ^ Uaa* alMta at* MLaeat aataaM 7t vol* 36* p« «S8aaaa to tha aaa* afcaai.. II, «r.

tliia doatrioa aa of Attaanaa and Algnaal^ ^SSm atiJijr

4iffar«naa ia ttet thaaa ata tan latiOllctnaaa mA aiaaifliaraa is ttia f—awa laxta aMaaaa at* Akhut ta Ma

Page 454: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 455: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

5U AXMartttlo

aAAtU ..

%€*%• Of AT'

». 199-^1

F«r Hmm

5 ^v.

ijS^inAgcfetyM ---XV<, n, I, 2| 98t &• X» S* «f« CfapgW.

3s«^

of.

3«n to tlMi iflUhllo Ji^nm

• .tc£i?mn'u lit

ie»»nto» 195S« i)m 180, i« 2i| :>• vn., U 30« It. Alb«r«t^kmgm eon»i6«r«<li ATloaana oaft AlaoMl m *j^lo«opMoeltotoo** Qf« •'^yi. d» Cy<?ot» « IXg Q* ^» fu 9» o%^« 7, voU8S» p« 46&i| U ^mt« <1» 'd» &, «}» obj* X. oaa &» vol* S7,

^« 3t» a* 1» o^i•

§9 TOl* 6, ?•vol* 9» y*

''

Boffor

of.flootr.

.uficri.i'to aiftklns

OKI aaft fbftt tboto^ innUMftltniiB*

.el et ;>oa ^ 'l*fflle*«

{£9} £lt«* ^« 4^7^ Sdo HftlMlBUP oolaA gn ooiMrtaatlt qnoa

^s%:ntolll^cnUMi ift ooilm oXifiiU oot, atvo ost

« aive at BAtHni«k»*«

iM) og. eit. . lib. 1, <ap. n, o»^* 8, p. 4SM> and IMa* . UW11, 'tr. &• p. 6l9b. i«« «o hftvo ooeA thte pMJlooo^Moai«wk «tf i9t* AXiMHrt** writtoB about 1S70. iiioooror* oao of

hia mtliw wmks, oa« of a Aiffotmt aaluvOi adopt*ttio ooao ^^tfitlon and fa«i» timt to bold «^o otb«r pooilAonveold te aiplaot tbo Gotholle Faitli, of. la tt SmUm d« 3»A, art. 9, ool., vol* il7, p* 66b* fblo «StfcoS«ntt«iaftor tho ggi-rm ^ q i -ragiturio ha'rln^ bo«i oonipoooa oboat

Page 456: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 457: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

4mi&«nM «t ^4iai«f»t« Till}. 193&, £»• 138,

(26) Of* tii« t«3cte of Mrl«t»» and a|«m«1 la wt« ss me«u

t^^ Stta* Ji'GMet, ^ X, tr* ;3, «• U» «• :i» aol« vol* 34»|)« <Maft^^%« eua ;i«aotis eo»flt«BHar ooiAm ma UaUtv*miSm0» nee «m« wwIimiUii, •! ttstatt MtaacLw j^voprioa

tfttiouMi MMttor* s«d ! T«ll«ant thtiOM^isM eA id«a

•net la orUtas «i«t«rtri«8l«« j^ttae la aotci oxIiidHiv Attatel.ll€*atla« lUac dlettatw «al@ft« orUti% «t aoaunlvoeci «asi lat^^ ' < -^ntlts hwrttnwi, «» food aon igMN*dltaitor la Mtu ate%»«otlon«i & jutealMUMMHtMaie«l t£>MM r«v«rt(mtar Vi^fldr ««««Rtl«B 0Qitffi««*ooa9Jl««m

«^» U;

bgy ^e ^^e»ale. «! olt» . prop. 12, 1. 21, p. Vfb

taA 1|>1&; « ;yo:>» l^i» I. !>»7, ^» 177. it. 4 €irt rofer

<fe» ^lin' Ifttt CM In pt^* lii*

(^) fpf «4*»f ^ 44Sft»* £t idao UIm lnt«lUs«atta« aern

liaMai oitl (bittii p»%«aikM, teilltt«t lnfc«l.l»««a6i «|ai^j^^nUtwt 90?flatan twwBinaaiH iMoeu ate 2te%«RSk ««bv"

{MUNit|«Ma M <nrlMHt •WMUWUn S«%Mi nitU>B«ft anloMqua dioltoar ooad o&laa ••% <iaM&«Mla oorporis o«8m4Mpl9»iel 90t«BtilA Htea l»lmitt«i ^hIa Ista f»ti» !?«r

^lui •! sMWtfflaa OMnrinilt int«U«(D«al, «% smMtlll,«t v«@fflii^l&Ui ln%«U««fHUi «B^« a»illti« cwr^vi* ist«»tiMii QBla nan oMttar •leMiw <»tp9i4tt* OM In o* naela attU QgMWfttlonltatft aliixiula oaa tel>«r«t ellqafifst

dMtiQSlw «Nr£»t« oieut dottraetitf t«g«f1ui%ll« ett«H»ll>U« la laittltf* 09«r«t£» imUai «ft eoiSMio ut

aftfwtrft aiH«ta tul auvtm, boo sot, MoanAon vAtloaan mov*€061 Ipeon «% mseaOl*

, >• 440^ IttM «MitA Cixinyi..^ji qat aon oiotaMiMLnt ciulteaannoooloa «ialaMB htibflra, alsl la

MN»sl attain aal nao «t taww Yhoba

.li^^flaHao qaMNtam alvo iui@«lil

Page 458: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 459: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

t$t. Albert

aie

sssJiAss «piy jh,*!^jfi:^^. Li'^ir^

i^^avm. III-'. -- - .^,-,

IH)

^; ^;i»; n!^ 9»t«tU to «wpor« «t ««KI «t tofe«U.

(34} ^**^n '^ tuttfa^feft liifc«^i—tap, Oftj?. ^# wU % £• *^

S J« »««» .tat «.• ipsiuB. iu^.»y?_gr? y!-.Vtvtatw in epr^». wa* to «• •STSLSK ^•ntfi», oi4a» ffX«i?»io« wt mw R«tw «»i!5s«Ple jp»

Page 460: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 461: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«^w

la IM^taft to X«Mll XOT«ftU» ft J«ei^ kiloo(»i»h€« Um?S ^liJSirS i«ia 94©: fte «»• »2i«^21^^

t»J O). Qit, . »• 463ftb»

Page 462: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 463: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

8* (>* Killir SAO

!R} cB«p9Bi ma

U) 9mmm UCtm^mi*^ U» t* »»• a« 4» sol* • 1* vol. ^«fl* i9UII IIBIMit qmi. lnfMdl«e^i» Ck^tms est ^>e«e miiMMii

v«l «Mrt«» Vt p«t«tt«t»« at «iU»^% naiKtn* soMntttr* Bi

pf«pt«r h9e dieim«» quoa lat«ll«etua egcna Mt £Mni ftiilMMl

!!«•» lA «o ««» mt^ tiw Mtei p90Si%UU «iUb ^»«r« na«i» ft% i» qsbM «it« slf« |>o««nt|ft*

(6) Qmm« Imm a«f«r ^•«m •««« is^rttoal E»u«r in the eaul or in

«iM Jtogols t9t ^U n^m%» ef« in I iumtm M ^* S, F. &• S&«

Ml* vol* ^« £>« ^9%» CoaMKtio in hftae j^urtM qfudA maim•it eoi^Mlta ox i^viiMl^i* MMBtiAli^a* «ii»« MRt 9ao« m%•t «•««, ocA aao «K nktort* •% Idtnit 1ft U ^<wt« * (U 1«

A. 6. 4, »»l., W3L. sr, J?. I4*j uaay 40 • ra^-^ , H, ^. 56

* I. ftd« 1, wl. 3»» p. 47Wt ;;o Iat« < II. » log. cU.i

(7) Xa X iiont. 4« •»• a* 4* f»U «ft» i?« ti« JA ron anxunMi i»»

toikidtaao ooivooitwR m mtovlAO ot fo»a»« tol <0to& ost «t

fNO ott, in mtttr* ot oaft mtwok ooanni* «t Itdo oot h»o

oUfftlA in mtnnu

Page 464: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 465: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

Mc p» 460B«i 4le«itai QW& 9«tio ftniwaltg cit^:»lioit«r mai*i«ti»t ectli««« tt fore* ttt&iMi «« a e^nm |)«rtle. :>i onMilHur

iRsriMii *ww%£tr » i!iMrm» nataiM ^wrttof taae mt liainnii via •%nslRM mlisBilM*** ^M aolMi gwMMi tttlttp ^raua ilUm

aMctttisi «t dioo fiwwy syrtia tntmm mkimeUf tw« o^

V009 darrnBa edt!|^o«lti cioeMl ^m«Aioatar 6e l^eo o»n|?o9ito»

^^) -^g^ Cr«at» « I» Q* 2, &• £« Ad ai£t» 9» s4 1» irol* 'd&,

p* 38E»i Uki4« «Q0d «i% lA«Ba qdfMI WBM «lt t^gnA wmUomaf

illni ratlocui ««4tto eolMiistlU ami ««i.lMm ••« in <|bs» l^snmam>a»itt halMHt WM «ieii»aam mtoMn* Aia «n««nalv» «oilt»

•l^MtAtl^^ v«i»xl»U« f«r tli« ttltatloaa of eliaoiit all tlMfl»^Mr t«a£t8 in $t« ^illwvt on «i* oaed <tg» iwd^^ wt is

mimA Q»Witn. Cfe>« «tt»> p. t7S»l84« a»«« aMOB to !!•

TRfI<nNIa«»« in tii« mmr Uiffioulty bat not AUnwrdittoty

\m%» oa ^i« point wtiioh voaJMl i>«niit mw to oi^ «il^S»liaiA*ao»«oUii« p« X78i &ft j9«iiM« ft*AlVtrt to Oioaft «Mr1a m^ottitian e« X.*Ktf« otoo a ^booaoos^ tiuito*

roi MVmrttO roo|>«ot)«s tA natonMiat ivwo(ir«eaiOi>^Uo* «f» In ill ^.-ytt* . ". VI, e» a« £,fot* Sd» !>• iSfbi er^ M^pMq^^ESnTieitur otons ««3i ii»t«ra

ewntscmii of• In X ^«it« D* SSf ^ 4* vol* S6« p* eo« ^r«o natttnto intellisi no oo(»i>o8it;iia ex a»t«fia «t forsn*vol qaod oot ot <tttO «et, la antesro ot mA aatiutt ooamsii*ot too oot hoe ttUtjoid in nAtam*

t^^^ to ^ ^a"^* <^« 3* <^» »• ^* Ml. vi»l* £&• i>« IXbt aod i^ootoros

(Aioujit* Qoatl oat ooe^ooittt ox <isioa oot at f^m ooti ot tonsipaod oat Aiffart a MMtoriay alaat aqppositua Aiffart a pot*ontia ad Idraam ooi oap^'onltar* Id cvuomI oat oot iboo oli^uiAfood praodioaWtla wt (la «o ^ao<a aett goo ast otttan zton

iaranitHir poaitttRi ab aoatoras aod Baatius ^^onit w»o<¥fao avi|f;ia of this diatlTieticm ia Jtootitiaa aa ^t« kX\m% talla

«a* far ttea i^v^iaaat tioeta in SMtlaioa ef« "^'SSSSSSL

'

.fH^^tiHtlaa 1» tto <^KXi 3tat. Soaaa ^nt, i» u M, ooi* l3lllN)t

Page 466: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 467: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« 0, lSiU«P

H'nofvm mtf ««•• «% id $uod eott at v«r9 %tio4 Mt^ Mm%tftwtdi Ammav «»t a1^i«M aonilstttft^** Omm ^laftd <»«» pmM»i^tm QII04 •«« «••«• ut 8itt alio Tiro partloipRt at nliquid el%««««Cmm di^lttit m— •metf •« && <{«»& m% man luil)«t* aRn« ooa*pMtm Allod tat ••••» aUaS i»9m «»H «aA Dt atttata ^^lalta^a^9»»» 20 i« b, Hf e»l« lasoct S«d 4liTtB» mibvlMuitta oln* («tt«aria

faraa 4»t, o«;M idw <»wn Mt» et Id ^io6 mU BaUqun tainm» ntt% iA <iQ»d ««Btt «f« ^|M^-aMNM|ia. «»« etu . p« I4»*4L48 «tto

^ava that IMa Aifttlzsotton fflnBORRn^t af «Mi«»sa ani«xiat«nea la lMttd«»«

(IS) 3tta» aa Cyaint* , X« ^« l^ q* s, a« 0» vol. 94* p# S94a«

(131 op* eit»* q« :a» e« 1» p* 4Mai ^Jae IntOUiiS rasna taUaa aittdaa aon mlTersale &m hel)«at taaa tn oo^^aittat nmBi tj^m iat

itMT wdlvwaata* for tha oan^^lata dtaea«»t<m of «Ma point ef«

^^^^ ^•q»» ^y Cw»t*« X, Q« £« a* 0t aal« vol* 34» p« )S93i>«994at

!<^ '" ^'''aatbM wtlm taiataa^ia Mt oan^^aflitto « nntaria at ftrRA*t ijMMnallliUta at oojnn^tlliiliVuit <i<iMnn tmAirrm p«aa-'

i w^Mrtautla ottqpoaitat a<Me|;««i««i tidUB aaqtM aalMHrta

«w«, .i^ ^'^^nMi mda in taUtes anivttaala ^p»d ptaatt^^ar daaa^iati '. aoaipitor a t^mm aRtariaa* aaa a foroa tBtina

aimJoaBti* la Qulteailaft aa,t«B vrnxst tails eaes^altio, iad mQGta Mt at ««p(l a0t» gimiuato^daa diait fiaa^^iai at <bb»o <wt m%t9wm ta'ttaa* gaf& mt aoiwi 4i«it tj^mm tttaa imjwi aat liortMM

at haae «aa^0itii» est in inoawtt^^titllibds »t in la^navaUli^iui*in qalliQa f»«i» tat&ya am ailTart a Uanm w^Mtim^t ^pta nmtaat)«t aatafiam ov^ i£«tai taton %ma •i^^aai'ter ^«r <|W)a aat^nam iMiVet AiatinotionORi a Rr.t<iit& pvopter «eaS«B aaaaan* £tIwa praaeipaa viuran ist la ^plritwai^ae imtataslllac la ittl\m»

aan art aaalpara «Hi|iMitlffiMB slat «%p(»aiti at nfttuxaa aajaaMt M^pMiitan lll;i<3«

i^!Zl ^Toaad Mt atTttto Mt piaaaiMntwr oa aqpyaaita*

Page 468: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 469: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

tit)

8ln« ipso*

SmZto a«^iiu» h*i<i* in l»«i ««»& e»t| j^^id., 2. nU,

4 tt ^«%«t^ «i«i mm li»*«t la «• *«»« •^l ^^2-—.^

sTilISjS.!^ fi* ^* - «»• «^- '^^- **• ^* '^^^

tU »L*r *» ft lilt I X« *»• U ««#• 8# toU »• fc-*•30UBI

Page 470: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 471: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

0A

^ Iij i» e wm^mm tnm0mma> »f ««J /vi«««niM jour

eioo fiaM# «rl« laaaimii a4 aawa pwrt«« «tlt ergs «9»io

wltM Irj mil* cfttiawaitMn quae oo?poMft» t«iw« fwrae*

Miii;^ wA «•* phf-

184) loo. elt., Xft »»tt 'wa* «ft«i «Wia» •Jf«^ 'fJ!f*!? 'f***^^

Page 472: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 473: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

asU Albert

wmMmk 4* «»ttti SKRt&am wHk dmi fit «dl «»$««% ni«i

aiMrMtiir* 4» iit««w»iiai%« mi "^ -^ ^yiXk «!% eo8|pMt«» «c

NOlm omwt aortas «t or^Emosu ut» Mber« 1« bm iaimiitX to

Av&o«aM» t» «h« «i%>l«wti~- -'- '" —-'--^.iftttl tn%«Uiet mMl «M tn ti« a«fSBi«lor -^h&t it mim 9t«p«r#

hie flS«lit^ to Jiirt««nm ^f tiie i>mi«iti«fii

ia»«Uwi ie ©0 * •* 'n 'a«riniU(n

of th« ftOuU .:., . . all ^^fli«WP»

un&er it* It Ic^ese to f^.« %oa;s' to rule lt« its feudlmMHi io

tbo aoo of lam^M^ ta notlsii «aA aritliist tint io« It yiaoo

in ft goBOVfti Manor «U tbo f.^aotli^o ithieSk «rio« fyon tho

OBion of tho ootil atut tiko l»odjr» «(• >;A;.n« ue creates 2X« ^ 6I«

It l« 001*9 tol* S8» !>• e^^*Mdo» BovomTmSS^ oooopt*«o hit aoHeition of HM jMMHtioid tntoiloet tliot ifeioh

Ano«ra» propooeil oo Mo 6«fittiticia of ^M latollootao

flOtHttoa ii^oUoetoo sdrootiooo tot fio ootlvo «aoo oot

p»ino|$>iott mrmo ootptio hooAttio eA aotioaso oingttlfto Qaa«

owt ii^N^vlftO oo^tttttoaU, oooanSsM <iaod istoiitloBllNio

eo«troRtt ^^BM «k4 plooituo jpfAca^ooontot «1# ot holwt too*l^ootan is oo^opitioao vixtutio vlt«tlio osi^otittvoo* «t

fOOpootOB In ooqpoMiticiio virtaUo fitolio iM^ilaaHlio ot

oooUffloUllo^ ot fOgyootaio In oonpototlcmo ljpol»o «d oo«Xa diotiOiSiiUlklj^ t)io «4rootlool tmm a^ iy^«Uttvc to*toUoet ^m *l}»m% oostimeo to istOKsmrot AtlotolAo vithAfleooRo.* cf* |Mg«« A* 4* p* 844HMS* 'mt pwmUMl m&tS^mvOMkUre IntSooto la m* AlMvt 4» aot ott»O09«nl <a9

«»»• oawotljr to tM i^iitotolion «iotl»etlo» «f iwittotlool

oaA «MmrotiOftl Itttollocto than do thogr la ^vioonao* It

io tiio miiamit oo«l liii Ito i>r ' tmaMmm oao notl^ IQ to 1&iO& St* llbOtt

F(xr Avieoiemk of*

.^ .^ ^.^^

, w, f# 5r, «ol* 8t|

"ootr i. "el^" 'tW* , 4. ., -.^* I, f. asveol. CD.

mt toxto of i=-lstatlo in s>o4nt oro :.o tftim*, HI* •»4filM<KI0| iO« 49SO |4«£ . olt* > j»* ggg, ggft* $^ «AOtoUod ftloeaooloft of i . iSuon in Avlooamo* for tfetO

4lff«Hroaeoo oitb /<j^ototl«» oo voll ao fOr tho p«rttnont

t«Kto» too Xm^Hitg to fHOto twrot of* Qiimmm Lio aoaroop

f* »•

Page 474: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 475: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* il««rt

im)

Page 476: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 477: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

m% nis«MMritft%ifs "Mattftttaf ISm mta j^t«t, 9104 la

fM tt&tM« wt • ftltttm intar om,...

t^^^ £SBsL^SSk*» ^^* ^* 1» <a« ^ e* $9 ft* £• fid QaMMt* S»voXn^TT* ^Tbt QaNwis «Blii in SM am •laft diy«y«a^«MHi M« «« 93M» Mty nm *t«l In «» par aotoa ttoapoidti0tiU»••a alBiiplieitAtiai t«^m v«f« «mt la eo qmxi «§t «t (^ob

aeltf iMttt aola ^«it ^^06 «•%» irt d«dtea «tio «tt ^mroiatvoinaaa v«r« in !>«• ast*

(34) 2t» UMrt l8 isda¥t«a to i^^nmt o£ iattiiira for tii« latM>>p««tatitta of Ibo ^lao^l aat and ^oa «•% (aMtrlao v^^ ooahrouEOA In Bo«thtit«« aUliert^ fiohop of ^oittera, «es 1«imin 1076 fot -olUero, tao^t al ^e sjehool of Cbarteraa ao&at £'aria| he din." f-n ll,M>« «r* Jgo gti3.f> Motoiro 4a lamiooo^^hi^ ^ i. , t. I, ^al'Sfff,

'!'•""."., i3<M, -• /.;ia«

SlltMart ; ' fell© liiere.? ctJii "be

4iTtd«ft :.-_-;..-___ -inneyi (1 - ^

tiM finti fflrn^ (22 ^m. a la««r f

^f^fMraa^ tarua aoteitaaoa aa ooeon- uV"

axoBiPlMra of tba fevM JoimA ta r:^- ^., ,.^ - ^-^a

f\»BM aa Moimooa in ahioh all ^la^ of t; oaft

Oi^fttto ahojroi (4) laatljr aia t^ izKUHfktol x

|iroa><rly aya awrolir (ajf^tyMMB. p^m^ a£« Oiju^u^ ^s,*j;-<»t<a.e

foaaa ait» _________Throu^ ^aaa foinao ^1'^ omn» fvon tho fiytt Fora* il0A«

to aU or^«ar« of li«ing do«i to Ifi.e ox^<or of natiuml thlnrrot

wttod f»mMB dlvimes feaftf«rat aaao onniaa* oattnOit noa aWfaofrora a BatualiVaa* Qooiram oantott otaa m. imm^ m\t> maill>art o^yo* of. o^>« ott«» (»le iaB9a» Is overjr erofttoA

tbiag tMHra ie a taoil diaftioBtion iMitva a tha fora aoft thaaoaayata oi^aett 2a aa^onUlwui aolB d.l«l oat qodis «at«alittS qoo est, (1M£«« col* 1S78S)« Tblo oto wrtj or fom i«a priaeiplo of feaiW* ^iit it lo ?^ot a aia^la tmrn^ far iteaa ta trokaa osp into r«al)^ 41«tinet f^ontta and ictaelaa,

(ildd«» ool« 12!K3AmB)« Ae%ial]jr onl;^ oin^jolar for»a exiat|tlw fioaarii aai Oj^aeifla forao are ala^ioUr ant In thair

«^« ^-eg^ini^^ c«w« 1*1^ iTHT' '«C^e3, l£0a»,»« foinao ^l'« 0MN» fvon tho firtt Foreu iIbA.

Page 478: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 479: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

in « void, ptimipUm of ^cini^ ami mnHX tm of kmidns»{ lMd« ^ col* 1S94C-»X;1» In stne^AiftT iM^ag* tkmnt itt anMAnure&y of UiMo rual fonat «fi««Bein^ a rial Itarafel

«OM«?««itlon» nMMve^t aillmrt did n»t otap thiKP«» :By«a

In Ood Bi«Bfelft fibifr* is & jtmt distinfttion l>et«««i gyy"^^^ divtoitiMi^ 4a0t fts th«r« te iMtiMii «a Id ttwffd w% SaA«» id aao_lpl. (md,« «ol« ymm<^U 1hl« divHaeilon,iUaotrat|j^the*19nUaa of t^ t«BQ)iliit^ of c^ll>«rt laoiiljr tbo ttxtontiim to £^ ItatAf of t&o dtatlnetiim vDlobKTiai 13i« ooetftvofeo onibjoot anS ^^-^ ""^maI pviiy>^ 1^ "^f

iMUne and Itolas lcn»«n« M arm. nO.! doeu nAOR thl8 iHJlnt i« that or '«

. _i_J., I>e ^^ . .-. uo

9«mittod aoo to oa^ ti»% tm tbo r

St. M^ort follooo CSU1»«r«i on %h'.

i» ood iit« iillMNri diSMKrto frost c^tondiiotogSf of <^% diatinetlor. aM inooi^' >

hlo o«n tojrk as a diotlaetloa of toaoon*

(30) im m^tato ^ia»oU^o%i^> «%• 7« ail 10, voU 8» i^ dd6a«

ooft tiwott OttlwtiMiHa teWHoPtoallo Iw^t doi, oloaft dSaOwa,vwran omiB oo^ft <|ii&a atooooitattM ««t oooo taai>oi ooeoasiai

fODd «rt «x eaaoa ptioA* aHttA aalMn oot, Q,aia potontlanluiWt ad 0000 iOiBifliii «a9d oot la «0 l^^oat ot taoopotmtlA oot tmimmAfm fUadaao oooo«.«« of* og» eit* *

id &St p* 409li and ad 30, p* 4731»*4M&«

^^^ y«»« pM»l« lit tr« 13, !%« ?7, a, 3, ad 10, «•*• 39, p* 961»i

iBtolldotaalie «tt^«n natura,*** 19a»oa dao teltot in so, Maoo^Uooti ot oomadna too d^^osolot ad oaooaa ^rftoHSBi, aofto

foeit do%or« oooo in oond oo ^tood oet« 8aWt otlan In oooooanton Id ^piod oot fo^wtioii ad «iOo iUod, oommdoBfttOM doi^oodot ad «tio aoooooo, a ^m aooiplt oooo, ot infw tadloatar moo oiottt la oi«t9Mito« ot Ulod mn oot onanin atltlo* iiol«ad«<;io8oelltt wrtntolnw that in tida mmUxnmSt, Allwrt doparto, on tho pvolMla of the Individuationof Vtoi aoul, from ^o aoticm of potonoor to tliat of %im Ulftifd oot, of. ^^lopd^Soooolia o« ^c, ai»r la Itoiaato anflJaSUoa

Aibwrt ic 75!gHffWTPBbto Contto worrooo '^ v&atato^ JJto^'* ot ^Jttwaa ?htolo;,iBC, XI* tr» xiii, S, ^7* «u 3«

fho "noMOoo^ introdaeod into tlio ai—a aiMloaiao hooooor

Page 480: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 481: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«Vt a» 4ilftMKl Ikwi M« Alt>«rt«i tfo«t«ia« ia 1fe«

iflNMrii tttOMi «ir« jK»t4Niflsr md wit*

(3Vi ttf* t«3ct In Ou^tw tt» a»t« 35*

ttOBia la««U«otuAlU imtdv& a«e««aite%«i hftttam « prla* emaaa^^

«« pMHiltAltt«t«R « flwipifty ^t«i« «onv«rti tt^pra Mlpmrnattt In ootrrcartioiM lllfi Icuc qsM eat » «!»•» jpyiaft* pmMtttA

{39) ^ OBitatt latgll^etas. oa£>« S» vol* 9, j;>* 4ti^lA-4S4a«

SI <ittla IMM nfttntft ixit«ll«e^i*lie Mt a»ter aatttfalta oo>*

^l«ui •m^aoAxm osp«r& vitM a»v«t ttfttuton Miporist «t••mndoBi tWMft fttet gm mmmm j^tisam^ f&wuok «% Ij^n p»lMHKfeiA«

<paina p«Bfi«l «d OftOMBi^rlMMit*** Gtw mUmr ^f» Ium qacid

ptnfttit ad cummm fri iSfl^ nollo aaa* fit In £)Ot««ftla« aeft

aAtoa paira«» aaaondiMi Ioq «vfe in «a InWllaetw agimm ttdtvar*

a«Utavi «t aw lyaii ait in p^aatift aaaiwdwa mIihmh* aftaat «l

aliM auLbalwii%iii« lnt«U«otuaiea» saeoKtaa l»« «it in aa

iii««iiaet«Mi fMaildUiai aaaaia aula iataUaataalia aatoya iaaaipaa aaatldanite ma m% niai ia pottanUa* at aiaUitar•ana a«naataB in »• age aat niai in i<»t«ntlai aaA qacki aat

ft aawOT i^riMR» aa% in aeta« at «e«ii^it wi •b&^i aae«aait«Un»««»t

Bia azya teatna afooipieae intaiiaattaa agaatan at IntaUaetttM

poaailiieii ^toia aaiULs IntetiaetdMslia aatora aaaaaaita^mHalMMia a ^aeUm aaaaa^ at paaaiHIitatars a aais>i«» jpat«it

aonferti a^i^ ft«lpaaaa at ia cam^nUtsB ilia Itix ^(saa

aat a awum j^rina pa»aty»t ipaaoibilitatam f^am liatet ia tidijN»«

(40) aamm 4a Cyaat« * IX» q* &d» a. 4* i. .., »4 S» iroi« 9S» p« 47eat

W aat liffWantia aaovmaaa aaaa»ttaa intav aa«a at paaaa*

at ^ aaaa raSsioitat a4 id quo aat at faxaai at as<na»at ^A>»u^ *^<^a«itay aa idi 4094 aat at paaalHlai

^^} Ov* clt. . q« 60f a« 6, 89l« jp* 4791)} anda aioat IntaUaoteaqoo' eei qui aat aaaa aikimaa lattoaaiia avn aat nisi in aa)»*

atanti* ita aatlo int«|laataa as«Qtia mm aat niai in jiaaaiUli.

(42) o&» cit* . <!• Sfi, a* €^ "^ 1« p* 470bt intailaetoa a^aaai

Mi anla aetio ma tf- «ll%ell>ilixm at nan raai»«ata

aatoaa aia^iioitar. ''at ad IntalldotlTct* at

Page 482: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 483: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

2. a, Kiiiw sso

ad «»«• Bt pt^lHKr hoe liif»ll«r^^*< '^ *«»• «t pMftiHlieyMptoat tt«« inUlaoooe* purfem «nl i «HiaU0»

^^^ JS^2&M1«* ^* ^» ** '^^ '^^* ^* 473ft* For «h« «<act is Ajtio^HJe

to ubieh :^t« AitMMrt refetw ef« S* inla&» Zll» 6« 49d& I5« «d«cit*

p« SS9m

¥

Page 484: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 485: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B« % SillarSt* Albert

to GVigfm TOQl

(I) w^ttta. HhmU , Il# tr. 12, q. 6S, C, wl. 33, p. SK :Tie UrnffAtiBa hiHi m^ ^et ti««8 m«» ef« ^nt^wtm^ .Ah. n ne.t..

y, T, 7, f« S'Rm E» hla eet «tlia lli8 illil ImmAt q-wa

•«t « Mt «aiR t«««tti&» ex fOA Tlrterl^M ista* tnooHit, ta«ran

mi^^mmyti^ telwt |«Qi,>ri«a a«tioiwB**«* litt« •ant £ia»Bft«

MMtffttiM «• aaiatt* SoUft «Mit«R taMran tv» ttt stti altim^

(8) gWb 7fc«Ql* « IX, 12, <|« 72, a. 4, •• I, aA. S. tol. S''* P» 4lAi

ex aniono «d ooriios noa babet (anl «) «6«, »«! «b l^w flaont

«& oor^ -«. » *^^«rt owcfully r«f»fttas f»«» Myiag ttwt

tM sets a i;wo«d« Ito aa1}«tAae«| %«9«a8e h« eta-

tiagi^i sMl th«N» muld iMi to hit adiiSf «s mqsr

»or».»'^ powtr», ef, aqga* &9 Cw»t* , XI, q« T, &• I,

^ 4liJ»» Cl»^t* iii, aJ* 79-86.

HI awib. ^«l* # II, 12, (i* 70, ew 8# »x»» Wi. »3, .>. -^t)! a«A

iSSTHoit 2o«tlaa Ui litoa .ittot-^naet, est totliio potMtfittn

In toui ;»04rtM i>»t«»t«tivir*8, sif« *?« i>ot«ttiM>«

(6) p.), cit» « sol** ^* nCai

t^^ ?««* '^^1«» lQO« Pit* , ttd. 6, p« 2L««

^Abi

(a) ;->«iw. 60 Crwt* * II, q. 2, a« 1, eol.t vol. 3S, p. laab*

Ct) SmdiifOl*, II, IS, ^ 70, a* 9, 8oa «©nt»ft £, foU ®, i)« »*»

i«(?eeii(mM dUTcront •«mii<I«i p«rfeot*« Cq^m pxotaiUo «8t,

ttSKMi «)erfvetiaow aeut waMnrMitar »m in aotf* intfivKSidL« a«t

fa «»«e ata«»ia luw in «•»• apiwiel nial naflHsr* ^«rfactor>aia»

atgo oaas «lsi«$iaArlo p«»f«ot« unn mt tta^nlorit i^ttftotio*

\«iUb«t bon» «Bt la hM hoao, qtuM Mt onoi •luetOarta hooot

mm callibtt tarn mta bab«t alagiaaria |>«rf««tlon«o er^

Page 486: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 487: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

UO) Soam d« CtmU * U, ^ 2* ft« 1* «»U» vol. aS, *>• W»*«

iJA^ J22aja4i«» ^« ®» *• ^» **• *• ^* *'^*

(12 J |^» clt» , (!• 7» &• 1* cjd» ii» i?« 9fifttll

(13} on. heol. B li, liJ, q« 70, ra. 3, wa oofttea 8, wl. as, j?» ll«»i

'^mmSmSvm wooir «•% In alterp «8%a •% iBt«Ueotu« iUa moMtnttiw «»M «i|^ttMm1»ir» ato •Mundatt lat^UActtani poasoat

e«gltari «»• s«s^iKlft« Vie«tiiUU •at in soosDiUi Mta et

t«9a«etta» o»^;lta7t pot«8t« quod •c^^s^ta sint* let tase est

fi. It od* 8, vol* ai»« 9* 9$9^

iW ^^ia.JiM.» Ii» 3l^'t ^» <!• 2, aw 3, 80l», p. 2Dftt

(16) ?^^ cit, , ed« a, p. s6iM

iiel B«/iriUm> II, I, «»p»». wl# 8» P* i«»» ami, dg Cys»#, n|

4«a«»io« of ioo&Ufi&t- ^^•*l in iS^e lk«ftr% i* 4|g«^

Cl7) s«a« TbooU m 1I» l^ 70, a» e, mU wU 33, ?« a»%i » to«

frMOieetair OH&f^ ^ ^^t%«t eaa p&rl«-*«Qonvertittur«

(1@} 't» MIXKrt MAitt^«Ul»^«^ ^'« -iftlMWttllW %i<» .^iftt*

for AvtsMOift tht ai« >' of **» ««aa» fwsj th« fiifferomo

io 09 r«al th»t it oeuimi ^ ^rodiefttoA •• pett of i%»

tMonoft, ?ho gonw, »bil« *«tee ft »»*% of «mi i«M«iM la

to% » p.-*t of «ho ««»«»• of «»• diffortnoo, fttttbw, «l*l

not an Aeeidctit of i»m 0)mm tho «iff«r«i»« i» nommtiAmBiMTOiAonul to tb» 8«iaa« vt^j^mm, «f»ft« » «» fl^, g^.V*f« ^ef^Ki il««Bwo ottaa qfjaOaBTpeMffleit^ <i« a^oclo

it» ^oflA t£ lOditfttia «Ja» ift ptMiiOfttat .do

difforoBtlf wt earaitoao mm aon jmuto Qal^ditotio

Page 488: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 489: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St. AlWrt

•|i»««««J9tettnui <»«» mno «M>d A&fr«3NM«l» nan ttmwmAt

iMUUi^bMtt 4MMr«Mi*««»£t hiSSrSStVMUmmm ft«t«HndaAU9..««fflOl^tiir ^Md 4iai%ar ^«t»« p«tM«iit« ln%«r« diff«rintl»a j^tiuaqmm 9&UnM»t «>Sft j^t«i«U c4 mm* vt am «••• in&ifr«raM

Ifi }fin% of fiNQt %hi« i« f(ur a»r« r«allctl« »)iub th*

«bl<i^ th« >:«!«• i»9 Ut ft |>ot«n3t7« m^ In tb* »«• filiHWUtei la ttM w<l«r »f 1fe« tnt«llMit* flMtt U to tcgr* owlit tnm nkttoaftl «Bi uniMd mi * %Jaijet tkliis kmrni fztwi

tfMO »«!Miy knvMi VtiSat0ff not iwi ft tlvird thttc ^fo» two tMn^«

l«l«MA*3MMM&ta» MjT t^t ^* /lb« t*ft IftMNg^ 4o«« n»tam^mr totftUj dif»s>eftd fro;? all r«ftlUtl« eotiatptl^n of tim

ilillliyH Qw»Q«« ti«Mi ««i»4 «x q^tewlftB virtntilMia >.idniit&tj^

nt taai'«« sllft Mt p»t«at|ft iMp|«fiAi« aISji t«Rtl<n<lic eXtft

vtigfttftaifUi j^«t«« ftoirtitftiNt am fi>ftel«t*«*tttj«l aeia Mtiaaiaft

iHina iptuw* t«A t»1»i% murtft* «»1a 1mm maUmm mmfkp mmI»a& at in <ititt»tl1»t«» •«& at lln «Xi«ilft jwtMtftto «t vlrtatft*

1^ tmldiiMi ftinUft teteftt ImjMMiMi dittfti»» •« ^pR«rtft« tft

totlaft dtvi«i3nta«*««Q«>d aatMi am enads ftnftaft (mnttuft

jpftftitat ^angilaur* »t4 aOIi* ftiia^ hfl« aft tottoa nft^urftM

in) m« fairmtlittM of atlbtrt ot r-oUiftr» ftnft tlM&» dsfinlt^

•j^Uftftttfto ft* iafliumaiNl ^t« Ul»«rt*a 4»9%Hm of iha

Mrt.ifff^ff^fllaaB •*• *• »»•««» tn fiallwii* w^ p«t& ofMbii; Sift tlto aanaa«4i 9t nan* :3tn» all liali^; ia fiO'^ for«

imbut <tiaaaiiia Amm tMi rirat Foa% aad* thro^^ t}-«a

w^ anttttaa wMLcfe Atm ttta Ibnaa onttatf to %odl«i« in

aa aaali «a a flam ia » ftovanl «mum of %«ts«» th« xaraal

Page 490: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 491: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

«ttaM «hieh t» sMMurw «o the ^istt F«m !• mntm xad9me9»Xin ttti oattaalltgr* ll«w« la tlMi «rd«r «^ th« Mstnae* th«anivtrftftl is pvlof t9 %lMt i,i(»vti«sa4Mr «»d iMMtow teing; enit* ?tuyi ttfm th« g«mi oy «t9«nmi tn %tm ^M&%$an «f mnnt^w iB «atuB«t the Citatt 9ijB^X* f&tm^ rntidwlitj) #)tii«

thfe to th« perticalMr «• find untiMdil^ wA ratl^taUt^iflmll^ w« iurtiv« At ttie wd«r of ^ laOivi^oftl 9t ilnsft^l^«ld«h «Ri»tt in tb« AKm% tail iM»t« ia «&io^ liw fmm tidtit*

It eaa te laid of «M fotno tJmt t)Mgr» »tt>o%>nt oXioai or

yjo'^fi.fftfcjfllf^i^^fm* •* ia flonJanctiOTi witb in* toscto

of stlWrt «»t«d alovo la C]mi>t«r IXZ* {>«.?^ 7, >^ j^v.

io «bo aMMvSi* All)«rt fOIlomtt«ea bo oofln IQT rooUilnjf tliftt f&r Gilbert ih«ro is flsot,tho oaiiNnroalltv oa& gifUHtg of tM ocitetaatial oooX it«oolfy oi^pio lim ft diffoffonoo lao'ltoiialt^U ««A soj^Tiorto tlw gomo eoBtoin«(t it^ it no an d»»<^ ajttgulLl ox i>otooteti>

(oip* eit.«» 09l* tS91i«U J«oon^« ftom thio ci«|4o fB»dorivo anl0»llt;^ 8n4 sati<»iiiiltjrf tbo *i0«lotiTO» ooatitivoand x^tioma ero oostftiaod ia tlio bigiMMr •otoallj'* 'Sftoro iotiio

fWB iMeh i« ^0 o»ul« «hi«lt amil io ifeat to t^ttb is salKiostoA in tho vovieiai orgMW of liio iRMIiar ttMi TogototiT**otositivo aad rattamalv

(as) tit* 1 De Coaoio et i'»oo» ^^t* ^* Iff 9tt»^ e« »ol» 10, p.4S1&S of* t«Kto <|<iotoii o^xa 1!%*2;ft« ZQ* p»^^«r, >^jO^.

^^^ ^^^* ^^ ' ^^* ^* ^^* ^* **^* ^* ^* ^^* ^^^^^i^ititt .

'^' '^'>'<?ro o»t aooii^oro f« ana ay^r^Maoit

aon ooo-v <->« in «o <taod iy?s««b«nlftt«r« «MIooooadan «9t iBtontl r. op«el«s* 0tt1» ^tcw alifsna

MOotHlia vol iotei -';itia ap^irdiOBOi iMil«feav«

Baoo aofeom aj^jtotunei^ ,> doUtor loatMnOo* nfttOMPItalMt (gpuBsmm

iU) l^« . If, tr, 3, oap« 6, vol. e« P» "^ir:^ Af

Page 492: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 493: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

B, 0, M||t«t

££Mr£*» ^^* ^'« ^^* <^« ^* wUf vol* 35, p* 20et»« luid oq« ctt« «

«• M« «• 1, aol*» 2'* 89Sb» or tl» <U«tl]iati«m of aravc euul

9Mi@lvt potency* In :.t. Al^rt of* Chii^pt* I, g« /o.

^^" - - -',

v,

5git* > XI, q» 34^ ft* I, sol* p* ItyeVy and »p* ^JV*q* ^4, a* 3, eox*, p>* isOSfti Dle«ift«i iid pHfflyM, giM MM*

t^' »»* ci»» « <h ^U a* &• «d iUaa, p* SIO** nlt«mti9•t ffl«NUox-taai wt d» i^TRtloiMi In haMtttn*

(S9i Ml?* n M «glBR. tr* 3, et^* I, vol* 0, p* ss^Iai •mocmobe*B sit 9*t«9ilift i>o(ielTa, mm Mt eeta •in* potmtiss«aidUlt* *9cti»i

^^^ sqw*. a* cypt* . ^* 46, •« *Utua, mi* 96, p* issbi

^^^^ g*"** <^< cr*&t* , q* 94, •• 1, »9U p* 35%t S«aMU ««««*ckcji'sir' l>*t@»ti& ix>0slYa, mm qmA reel^/iat fonM qos*tffWMMHikftt *iife*«aattt«B *m» i* **k*t*silwi •o*«bAhi «••*,••d p*tiai ifwwmteiwr in •^•et«M »*miilNil«m ••otvi&ttft

lat«n«l«HMRi| ef* 0;,« clt* . q* 4&, •* &, ftd S, ^* 4UVt*p**l«i ••lori* in (KtiO* mn faaWft «a«« eolftrls, vettMkM!H<MM0 «* iaeM^n»tion«B i>«r i}*** fttfloiior prlMftelplwi

McE^tiwrde ft«n«iliillas «t ld*o tmmtt r«* ••zmaI* in an*eolos*, ^ttla mm A%*t»ihils«r •••tmd** •whi «***,

(SS) *t>* <?|lt* > ad Ql}4* £, 3, 4, p* 4iGAt

Cm) Ub, n ?g Aiit-a. *r* a, eftp, 4, wi, 5^ p, agttet

t^^ gfi^ <S* Cyt* . q« 94» *• I, «d 1 *« 2, v*i« ^, j>« 296*i*f» *»* *it* « 4* 38, A* 1, ad* s, ip* 3»z%to r^or %«3ct* *nth* vSri^r of *etoh •«»•• i» r*ffur4 %* its 9»op«r *an«itile,

of* sgai* a* Crani* * XX, q* :^, •* 3, «*%•, j^« SiftM

^*^ S»"^_'^5 foet** 11, Q* 9&, a* £, «4 diff* #riiiB% Wl* 86,pTaXSIE^lBiir -^t* AllMTt i» e]o««lj f»ll««tu£? th« 4«liniti*iiflinft 4««eripti*ii «t*«a ly Atl«««*, M^ ¥!«&%* . •<« *!» .

f* 0r» aol* tp* K* *!•* IBMW* th« a*finiti<m *f Al^gsael,

U 8»-ee*«««««*^ -.^»^r**u, «^'«'^-. -^c % p* axti ^mvS;^%«;4ber «*f«B«*» Ji^rtnslA •»•* atUna* Igr An • oamMMi imwawiila*

Page 494: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 495: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St. *n«e%

(36) caw, a» Cy6ttt. . II, «. »?» »• l» »oU. »• «•»<«»» W•^pStoTnT. /abert Imm are o^la Tle«BaB». loc. eiU* and

Ala*»®i» loo* cit« , ?• lfit» !• !•*•

St. Alb«t«« fiirtot Umpir&Uon fo? eslUag it gtxwt^atft,

of. q^^Bcl. toc« eit. . I. 17-19. -^. ^l^»«»^ tfooo^oako o*

Ov^^B^Ss {^9S^S!^Sik-4Mo&\ «e '.»<«> .uMd It thtt», of.

tSSTef. iio i?igf<ron»*A At^q^ »t o^jgltaa. o<^» « 52s,.ffi?»

f* ISO.

iTtaS foona In q». olt. . f. 6», ool. 8K» «ii» tetwrpMtfttiaii

•f tetenUo relatlag t© pwotptlon vtOs «V *h« !««»« •««• ^7*

U^wt 0««o In tim min to «ti»«»Ai of. ap» clt.. f. &r» col. u

9pm elt., p. I'/U," 1. U-lc..

flro Inttflor 00a«». 1»ilo at. Alport I0 ina,.i»od In this

part of hit pivtbolOfiT 1v »iwim# iwi tawiw «*a ^«o*<»

^totle tam^ tl^«o OR tbo taMW memm* Atlqennft^owo*

to oooil? 00f« to o& ArtototXe hlao«lf. For ©it tiKto of

II, a, 4iSftXo-tSrKTo&i in. 3, -s oa

i^goiro^ton. layai lawi 46ioi -"^^l.r c

TF^, 3nlv. rooe, iU*^ Cl»»f ' ^'i^^^^(41) ^a«n« c;^ cyeot. , II, <i. 3fi» *• !• »>•• ^^» • '• ^***

(42) op» elt. , R. 4, BoU, .8 . * ;„;/„•'» • "^^^ *• ^*

(43) 01). on. » q. -'>» -• -, o'Jl.* <^» iJMft.

(44) gp. Pit. , a. I, «i* 1, i?* S^"**

Page 496: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 497: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

»f

>••

KOtM oant cowssjnia «t it* «aii »!«»* «lli» «* }•»•» «•«•

gtffitiTJilUSrae sit ati^f%«. t«» t^^*^

tel» <^oa «•« owatWi**! «t nMi wt »ja> •<o«na«a ^^«^^

(4TI 09. olU , I, I. e^. «• wU 5, |^« 127>428a.

^ Swt iflfe«li«ta< «on «it mtaa In <ir.i«vno site

tuMB .MMt •!• iiU« i^«« »lt«« ia i»^M», ut a smsibue,

«t uhantesifti cf. In X ^mt. . i). 0, r, a. 2C, ad r/.i&oot :;,

TOi. 26, pp 26iit, ^srsB» *• ^» ^» '^^^ ^* ^'* ^

(50) aurw I^wU b Ii» *«•• 13» ^ '^t *»!•• '^^^ ^» **• ^^**

Page 498: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 499: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

90 GS^fSft riVE

^^^ ^< ^^«to» IHy S» (SOip* IG» vol* Dg i^» i)Mt»«

*** Saat* *• Cr—1> . II, q. S», »• 3, ©lOe* 3-7, voU 36, p* 4611>-

M fcwwa ..* vi ^aftt» » V, », oe» cit, , i, ser, ooi« fi,

«a£ t1&^d» , <Mt^* 6, U Ste eoi* 3-a6v eol* !• For aI^mIef, ^S^t ad* git* a «'• IX, tir* 4, 3, ^>« lt>7, }* ?«>10, ««&

1%S4«, XT» ;;, ^« 173, I« S-'iSfi wtA !>• 161, !• U?-l?« Si*«^poaitton of th« <k»etrliMi of ^«m too .^roHouo o» tj^io

^rteioo «^lttt hoo bom oSmtittlAy tfono 1«7 r, iliioti^ Iff

(e) B»to HiOt :^*t» /ilbort oofr«r« ao oonfKOton «a tlM potst oftKo imstll boing an InteUi|;iiioo mA vioo«v«nM*

<^} 3y»* 40 Cgoot, , loe* ott., ad 3<*7^ 2»» 46«V»46f^ M iilldS

doMiio ooKV^t et«i lwtclIl:?B«feift wgoUo» ooj>ai&too ofiA

tMHitt 4iffort in h»e Qood ootiao tntillootff ^^oatlo oit

«li»w i^tantftonftto oDotnlMMNlt tnlvwiolo &• a^umAammitiimqooA SMI foolt M^J^SSSsiSJSfttMSSSit ^''"'''^ gmsf^m 4ao

in qttHno convenlt otm eo« ^cltnt tSt J^I^mhiIo, <pod amfliit In oorporoi aoqao ondUs oet in oos^poro at vivtuo ooain orpoae ooriMnrto, otoat vlroo ofooilAliot aoo «»t tocorir^otro at roelj)>ioii» o j^ltioitomntlltto oorpttom tiotit ixr*

toltootaM poaotbUio,

{7) of* t;tt* I, p* 6.

10*W 'hlntM»0 0% lUiOla.'^^OOO, ^)•' - AS*

Page 500: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 501: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* />ll>«rt

tut u. totUa, »9t« ear IW r'^ .£

(IS) Xn Ml t^}?pto*im%% **»• %h<flr «v *• U«t«4 m follwst

C9mm%&V9 m tsm n^mgStjfKitmt 1»| on %h« im Mine, :^»

«!p«tlftlly •» q««itti»ns on tiMi NsiHst intellect; o.^ %hm

p, 20a, for a «»S5«ryM*«ri?»«t«»lon,

iU) g» Agi«» ni, I, 7, vol. ft, p. »*l»<i.; i±J^|aJL2li£4i^^

tie) i3» mm nu 3, u. vox. b. p. aee-sses re Mite« t ortetet

"nySl 8> 4, tR»U 9. F. 4«»1»-406ft.

f» leorwLb-^.

tX8) c^f-, elt# . U lClmBG-61,

U9) Op> dt, . f, l6Cl«33-86.

1 20) 0^. oU. , f. lfiSia47*«0»

(21) Q»> Pit, . f» ifi9v»e-ia.

(fiS) 0^. clt.. . f, lfit*MB«^«

Page 502: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 503: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

SU AlhwtMO

t^) ^^* SMsMl*» f* l^'fff^'^fi ^« 170m3^» l?lrl4»].7| ].79ff»9«6«

(£6) ftp* olt«, r* l&ljra3c>>37i mm mAM rsetpleiw fti«rtt a«««9aanv«% nainMi ftunt MttfiuM^ iMNMMHM fwt at fiKttaa alt Mftmtsam

jfr<i^f<mitiQi!U!m Ij^se^ folMi 918% A.^«at«» ma Urn ^mhamtrm

**^* ^^ ^^^'^^^ ^^» 2» i» B* ^***»

'^^^ ^UmmLL** ^* 6a« A* 4« aiU 8« 9f p* 94Mhm

^^^^ SSSStgSSSih* ^^» ^* ^ ^* ^^* ^ ^* <^* ^> ^ ^* ^^* ^'*

faft) flt ^»t> ct Int. , I, .., .1- '.n« fitUiUiaitar

mU& «• iHMrtiBaliiHlMHi*

^^^ £SSk3Sll*« ^^« ^* ^* ^A* U» •• a» p* 3» «A*, vol* X,:>• isiSfti ; or '^hft m»« s«Mvla1w» aivvrndtm ti this »»iaA

Page 504: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 505: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

tJt. Aiinrt

flPBM*

(40) cf. JlylPt,, :.c rd- <a> III, 6» 430«dl-l2, «i* ti%U » ?• «»•

(41. J j,:« mim IIl# 2t 10, £}• 364bi «* Ule «•% non iiol&m heMtaa

tiiiSi»«n hftU«i»> ta to© <5»* i>«r ll?«»» »3it ftntaft <|»«ii««

vilt, «t non laOi^ aiquo *>«r hoe «ttrin©e60 ^«*iloi«at«

v«l Oj^wante. cf. laau a« Ct<»»» » «• 6&, a* i2, «i I, wU '^,

p« 4&9^-4606.

ipyphf 1^', 'iaai 1 laafe at htibm» hM.tm ittttllisttt p«r

ef« m<U . 36*^i non •aim ipMHNMnii 4te«i« qmA pn^fKtU^

in%m90%n» Ai^snlis In tattam «4 «]rtilt«itttan tt(mi««B MAis,era cerslrn iB^jonlt fMNaoM la tota aftt«ri« «)mki«« m ^iMta mt«sift •!« alt^alft «iiii%an« 4« intuition* f»iRaM,

fmt«attae fttttfieitsi f«o«rit •« •« me «st it* in iat«ll«etu«

{43} c nlr:*, ttU §§ W» »• JW***

144} t^cuti, go 'gc t» . Hi ^» i>e, »• a, oA i* P« 460».

(40) «f» ArJgtotle. o»» clt»« 4»Qi|6-l«i «% «ieat luuam*

(46) ATCiffOOn. Q.t <^t. . f. lG3va6S-lL«hr»Si S% |«te i>roj?ortioilP»

nw%dis invcodtas p6xfecta inttor oaM«e«««i vifa», QtM4

flMf«% Ipmn, tMoadiwaitua «Rla Dolbieotm visaa oovone ii^sonit

qiwd set color, rxm mtfit ij»»ai id.»i ^ptfinSo par praMMStiMi

loeis afffioitor color In uatti, paat^oim •mt in jj^Unti*,

Ita int«ation«a itaa ;ina.t«« nan anvant tntaUaattaa «aU«i«lca

niai QOftMia affieiant*ir IntaUecta in seta, poativaraa m<m%in ;iOl»ntSa* ^ |?rospt«r haa f«ti% nae««»« /»rla<iat«l«» ji^an^rt

intaUaotatt ag««NNa» ^ar athar luaft BtsAltUf atrw^ taoHa

H7) X)a Aai tfc. Ill, 2, la, TOl. 6, 9* SMft.

Page 506: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 507: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

S48su 0* iau«rSt* &lD«rt

fo cBAiiss au

YpT ^1. I, p. ne^ r^u Albert know a«o '. •»*« «»•

'H^">-rr.<y;Z . ^y» ?Vo^'*»^. > 82V^>la, t^«re •wen r«w«*w«

(41 Ub. 7 aeto, t». ft, e«s?* s, mU s, i^* 36ib-56fi»t «««*•««

in Intciloottt s^rUm* Oftoooo otattt In fofaaii «t £rl» l«iiSAO....

ilia ortloa «>«» «loo«t «aiww«ao onto foea, wm ««^9«r«» o^MktetMitU «t mtid«ot

"-"^raat «et «Mi»ffi$loW«*« 9:*^^ tit o^oo. •* ^e wi»%«

'••witSa. «t 00* iwp. q«14 trt •• «i»*«»t a« *»^ •«*«» ^,moi tftiio oo»«i«^* •t •!« «t «* f^ *f: SfezJSLfi^ '

a ox hoe ctuMl orfe o^iVkUa e^tBi OoM mlUo tooo, otlftw

' ^ ^ - •aom. tktiv^FOttlo oatiwi <5«ott oleant •«»•

of. rAb. do . r<wl»# **• 2» '» ^» ^***

Page 508: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 509: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(») Ub, (to iya«<l>, ^, 6, P» 36tt*i £IW«» M» •* •»«« ^'c«t«niln 'in'oe •« in ooImi •* in ain^Ofirit •«* ia •»»»

e% iiiftt«um]L«« in &« mtofit in iMMl dins^ioi*

{m .i« Int. et X«^«Ui^> ii U, £, »» p. 4Mw 5*4 ?*r*« V»m»«^

tai^tt&i «c hi».*«ei oie 4t«r«» w&it» ^oa^l onivwsale •»

ft^%i%itfiii« «t «»ta iit la »lo UiUlltettt, •t mXlo note

in re i2?ea.,.««ti»« ««% imta s«%mUm» •• ?•««?*?***•

(1«) 1^ i«fc. «t Xntaiia,. i. s. 3, p, «»tei »le«t «««»» wrt j^^••« al«i ia mturft pMrttmtaatii of* ^fteu T» 6« 7, p« 9M^i

Bm iidlt«r JBOdo «wei|>t» nuAor* MetRftw » f«w «»* ••«•

«•« Mtt* r«n l^tan*

(19) ef. pe-tcealn-j mte* y

(ICJ l*.«t(fc«. V. ^t »» P» 36«»« '«*«» «^ *^^*' ^**'"^ •!jf^^^L.%at ii» in o«wt ««»4 lirt* !»•« •«*«i« i»pr«MB»it in 9mi^n» «»• •«»» •J«ii»4« •ffrta t«1 *»«»• *Mttitliw tat «• M •!« iB«lft«« »•*•% tBMw ad oonia »tl

aUt» r«lfttioiwft# «« »io ao»ii4t «i»lT«roalltati« ««««•«

mtaaiB «t vatiotMM»

(16) m>. clt. . 0^. 7. P»?«i«^ «*^ ?^*!2L1 SfJiiZa.fgiTiiaeaiitfMiB Id «ib« «• hM» •oet6>ltiMri *tt««i »»* mmmh

Page 510: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 511: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St. nttrt

«io4 hBQO art ikwn* fHitt «rt ]«riM WU «0»U »>»«•^

difflait lp««M wd amla bMO MnMQtantar ••»« lpti«»t»

<ir awiy »«lfieanan. In Atioeanft th«t Ifl a 4«eW««

r«fQt»l to oonfoea the i»t«r« In ttMlf <iAtJw» wHb twIndtTtftofti or »lth tho con««^. fw ho oltwPljr aotiagttltMi

1)««oMa «io aodo of a thiivi in ^« iateUeet «n& ISJS?

opoeloo* tftHo t9T momsfU too c«ihmi oBtaOt «»•""^^J^Jy

Of %ho onlnal to rtaKUjr •aiy «tot 1* 1» »i«th«rJJ J*

A notorial bo&nff or in th« intotlODt* or |£LS£ ^^ ^*

B«ith«r wdfKMNsl swr i^artlotOon /nfi •<> intho oi;»««i«o«

horoo iB only that to ^hleh «io oon iHilBato lao ottinmi.

or tho oingttlar. It l« n»ithar ia itoolf• Shot ^«f^n tho ooarco of st. Mtwt oo tfeio doot^iae e««ao falrtjr

Oftdtnt In Ifee U !fet of tho tOKtt«*>»S;«»» jf.^ST*

irtMH^SrSettofeoe qcDd animi ort to oo <i«ofl<te«» ^ Kt««

•«% tttreo olt ooaelMle, aut olt iatoUoetun !««»»• ,

In 00 ft«feo« 0000 ha^ n<w «»* tmlToroolof noc oet oln^ro.Si mdm ia oo o«wt anitoroftlo its nt»»6. •sOmUtaBtW hoc

qaod tf^ oot a«li»Uto«, •••^ ^^^^^'^^^ii'SlfSlw^oria.hoUm onlaea oaoo otoffaloro* ood oatio oalaol oioot attvoroo»

Hmtm mH al ok hoo «itti4 tit aalool «w«t oiagalaro,

tnoooiMlo ooeot ooso pl«» ««• •^«* otefiuUro, ooiUeet*

Smi rtaaoloi* •*»! «*>>•• «>l»llt»»# •» ««• i%M««*«iSttil otafjpUro oooo osiml* fmXmX onto* in oo tot qpiod*

doa lr.tellect«i In aonto tsmd olt ontaol* ot •«»«*?»»•

oood i«loUidit«r 0000 oniaBl* ao« oot nloi onlml tootoa.

MiMxbo» pr»«tw M» istolli^tw •«• ualvorsolo, mit

ttiiMloto. «at alKgOA olioA* 4«« IntoUlgitar g»MiU» hoo

SISS, ^oilteot id ««e ••t *«il««a. jao4 o^lt «*^itoti. of. mo.. g»t». . t». n oog» I. *• ««»w -tfflaltso

•«iiiilt«tlo'1&3r*'ractor dlfflnitlonoB unlvoroalltiitlof a«0

^Swoftlltoo ooiiUaotur la ttffiaitloM tVitaitmo.

BMiaitoo ot«iia hftUot diffinitiotMM m»» mm «8«t oiiivor-

•oUtoto. 3oA oot ooi aooitUii wilveroalltuoi lado i^oo

otfOaitoo «on oot tOXqim aiol o.|tttoitiMi toatoa. Ijja •rtj

^iZ aoe oot fflttlto aoo «»•, a«i tirt «idol>«iif in bio mmtbH'

thm aoe i« aaiffli nte oot oUqaiii horoai potootlo vol ofroet«i«

Page 512: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1

Page 513: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lift at bM ooatSiusfttQr i»t>» esvooMm •aalnltatio. l!h<MHi

t«c«§ «i« tm^m. f»m ?'^ oiiecm^ oi>» oi%» » p« lao, i8i, a»^ i*

(19) m%fu m 7« 6« f, p« SMtti Skltiim ftm%«i iU« (pc»« «•« antTwrnO.*•tB|i;>].«i« aatora •«% 0«aunSw tttljMiitm «]d«lM«» «i iai« eoa»»

fftwMl Atffintw^lmst wit ni t£)M «»t j^rl «m aifflitui* tonetpM ««s»i*iitt »lw9la«* in wm qfKlMllRt** et noa «koelpitur

<t«ui «aiuHiq^n»lwr a»u •U^ ui Almmm <^tKMl Iioaei

nmimtm t^mm m^- t»a «•% homt sie «eaaaim gmtBm^ «••• ku ....,,^ mm vol in Of^^sitttOMf 'ittlA 99om< u «•% «• •»•• «tio« q«Mt amliigMaitur lA mm iHwrnn «% Um hao raodo

atQtt* w»f» i>fi^sKVl«P!j ""^tse tmm^ at^iM ndtei^tlU aiSxU batm r itlva^ ^oMaria am

(19 i .m<l. . p* 9d4ft«

^^^ SSSSt^^ too* <dlt« . i^« 1R37l»t i|tti« aniT«r«ais mtotm «at.Hurtiealaritf aoa <2«i<Ntt tMiwMluaw «»»« m% atBiiP«rittl«»

^plft «l« ana «i« aalMftanHai* 9«a ctttcsMtat QiiMt «Bt aattuartflpUa attt acaM^t asta tnivaraala* at awia la t^aliaettu..*Vann loitar ftila tt ntSMaa «it pHmipUi aalwtaatiaaaaivtrMlia a«i«» a«e«aea aat «tl«« w ««&• asmt mt hUasaa nniTainMillUiki CMid liaae a«nt fi^tmipla noa at in aatara*»«d at in A«noHfialv«tl»at%aa asaaptai at Ueal «aaaa tint9mmtrm mw pHmisiiM mMmai at aaiaatt* tuam aoamuA aaftaa aoHS* aaaap^a**** /• aoltlitUeatiatt of taats «ti

«Wl« jtaliit aaaU to p«lnt],««8} tMr ata «a Im fwmA Draottaot*-

tjr la eU af »t« /lbart*» aorko anft aaah is in <M»(i|ilat«

agf«aBiut vltti «ii« a«har* 'Stm mum angr 1m a«td af tM taataa« tlia natitm af anivareaiitT' aaattimt ar hn^pmim ta thaiiit«Uit:i%>l«^' anttara* ecf* mia*» 7» 6^ 7» p« ^MSai !3k i)»~

Oaatta as^aa qaaaa j^iaj^saltaa iatantiaaan aat %aa atat9«ra»fMEMl aatura IIU aai asatiait aalTtraaUta9» la m aat a»M

I9&i af* Uh* XII^ p» 75 of* liOta* loc* oit* . p* JS^ib; r;^3)a Ltb» aa>faa<* * XI. e» i^* aTb-vOETT

'

Page 514: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 515: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

3U Alhtmt

fio«e«Rte par atatraetionoa «i p^r i8tlverMlttat«B «^nl« et•taiMmtc* :&« Olrvet Snl1.wm« of AvietntM U wnHlvtcdteH*iibmMfi^vX t}d0 «t>ol« piolklcn* «f«. sHemsti^ Lajjjtca* ^ • 1X1,f, 9rt>* wimUttttr antowX In latelleJsfa • " "^St; ©t«j«ui enivigrsftUtMi tivt tftBirftUtM lOiu' :>r;, «k &miqimmI (itt ifiSttdJ. tfnMlwIt nUua ^dU!«a» .

rr :.if«a!i«

p«r ^4f •% ma to^iinit v«l diMriL^wit ni*

futiMl tel elittd aHtgadd^ vieoft tllmt «tt

iRt«ll«etii8u ^«(i qoott alt bono a&t la^ia, ossat j^xa«lM»

patatav t0a« anaait •% £;«r»ui le^eaei ««t hfoo* aifttaral« «aSAgmM ««t aali 4)1 8eGuaa«aii ^wci «»t «aiiMa« qacm Mt a^pliiii

iMi hoc at ii ga0d int«lllglt«ir ^« lUo {KHmtuir oati^tumtio

'^ ffeolt ©t Oiieretor et isnr^ilt Atom mmi bvA a^^aeia atfiifBat Xw9tni8««»»

(^1 Hitft» . ?, 6, 7, p, seSAs '^"^ H<- '^.oaddaa advevtaneUMvoXoa aotalttles as t^o •BL" 3^^ «0t nattirft QtMi«

sectmdws aa e«i|a« aali in ir i0q\m in rat»ffl« heMMy«> oarto qmxAsm aat da ae w,. ,. ''f-rie at aasi^ars atpar haa qood aat ia atiSaiftt nihil r littits:

^^^^ ^^ i

<^* ftaM. . XXy 6» p9 961»i iu}<l «*a« ^laftartttar, qoAlltarait la mSjm at in ae at in elngniaxtn diea oan ^Urlatotalao «tI'ariltfetaiieia* qa&A aat ia wsBitaa hia lyiot ^mm s^tMrnrnMamraalan* et ranlitar aeoc^tai&t

^^^' ^i^« <^-g ^TBad« ji II, dy p* ^1>t diaiana <gi«K>6 aalYiHr«iii»»h»c aat, iKtart^a Qtaaa oaivavaaliA voaantoy* aaeuacbwi m9aMXtSi^ a«at at vnl»cii>a aunt li^}«mraUllii at Ijiaotrti^

titilia at invariaUIio* ^iviaft atiaai astrtt^ vol pva«tariatftUaotiua aolof* naOMn aft p«nui»««*af« os« clt» . aap* 6«

<«8) ^ ^'f^t ^^ f!^MMfar» »t «• 3» !»• «Mftbi ^1 &«t«n Quia^ olnjaeiaty Quad a«ef3En(*tm dicto uoiTaraala aat aat* r«» at

oaa paat ii;?a&ffl«««i ^mlvaraala aat alhil aat, aat

Page 516: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 517: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

atv

JS;.:^?^ S^.. portion f. ^n"^-- fgffi:^

' -^ ^,« Cf«»t.. II, . • - B» ft. 2. •* f 3» «!• 3©» P* we*'

loe. eit. . aft oWTaT*. &• »• **^ "rr-ssTStii rlit

Page 518: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 519: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU a* mUer

t«fittitZ« fmm mm «»«* h»« qaid lj?» «t «<i w»o

i-< _ -.* «i ~-s ftOffWuftOBM ron»« «»1« «Et«ri«»a» ow 'NSW**

ln«ell«etaii»

4Ba Itxfflinia ptia*© wmaM 9iw l«i.«.«

Page 520: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 521: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

4b«^liMtaa «t «1 list oeo^MMiU* CA lantn iK%«>ll«8ta» In«f«ati« •& iUoi iMMa vat tnt«rtot MM0t«t«r* 'ja««d»Qa»

«at«m nt ad ««i4iinBt|aMM tii%«ll«»%tti iwirtlii^i •% divlsiiqtttft ^*hU9ao:)hl QitfteR aatasR iKMramraal imArmtmUmUk%9HH3miti6e0 m tpttd i»t«Ulg«iUA taprftpit Sa «•» •sttft

SU Al1»ert IttlMMi tiki* iNif«Mne« l» SM^s lUtMsliiatini^ M tiut

tmiMr HMtw fr»a »t« AnipowttrM fi»t Umi th« ttrtwtoait•trwiRar* mm vdOlMUjr difr«r«Bt« wttti st* Avgosttso tb*tlvlnt XU«Mla»tSi(Mi fUMtlMM ta» fiw 1h« fwaatton of^« 99m9s% tftMi ftot 1M kflM&cOtft ttf «t« tt»«b* It ^wnot on sajr AtMrtiedtlon t^ mjr n^MI intell«et« Sh« Dlvif«ZUtaidMU<m itttwv«i«i sot in tbi fiMaltgr ftf •cnMt'Hiietet of jod ijii? «di««ta it IfiMf« tlttt 4dii«M«M« af n«owrt1^»iMWitftMIi^ aad oioxnit^ of th# ^rMont tamltk* For ime ofIte 1^»%imtA ««El» ia St* Aigwtino «r th« Xmtt HwtMr of*|t»Migttrta» XIU 96t t* ^* L* 3S* ooX* 1216* «h« CMH^lctO1dr«ft%BiBt of this «;«obla» ia stm AtigoBtiao ia t o b« fMHt

> ^noon. Intyo4ifttioa ft I'Ktwto ao Sfetot AaauatiiuSb^

(6> oy. oft« . liU ob^«* j^ d€^ A6 faM «e«» «iwu %«ft«lt«a>« tJftrtui

«slo'lt<ar ayi^oeltl.^ icrstiM iiOf»«« XdMHtMUnt «iB4l lA gmtta«9oatetr q;&dll^>«t donaa a I'm ^6,%i» OAtsm* hano non fithM ttatt stiotUi U» filoit qadLtai jghUoioiirhiw, i^mA •ttoaaiatlqtiid mtntwr in iHOkittt* mm flirt oosmndo «l ««t«i aldi£«r eonforaloaon «4 looos inti^loetao laorootl* It4|>;;^oam

tl»t ^iviottonft io iNi^Uii ^io aoUM of tho roMvtd i«)^lt«fttt«a

•f • It^t* in ftOo tMmoOy tl»t Afftoonna tati^it tl« a«e«Mt1gr«f toraln^ to tfett «i8«it XatoUt««aB« fwp hlo roNi£>p«tfe«Miion«*

8«Mv«r» ^t* Alfewt did aot dlMvo* mi int«UootiiaX mmmej •»did ivioonnfti h«»e« tbo oosot «ro aot i>3r«eiool^ i^iko* of*

aotI^M>f 'jtemd oaa Tto j4mm ia at* ^aeaotlno** thov^^ of*

(7) -UD* .heol* «r* ^9 q* 15* a* 3* 6* 9» sol* vol* ;il» p« U0>»Ui«it ConooB&an onia Mt. gayM ftlao laalno ttlltiO«ff«ito iatfill*

oo^os nuUiao eo^ti intoIXoetcui aootor j^toitilio povMDtivo*oot* I «r boo «iIa IwMa i^floiti^r IntoUoo'teao iJOooiltUio

aalKiftlf «oti tA oMfttttdii v<t»o» ^fttottoai ooti at laaMfiMMklftootoe* '^oriig oot* !a»taei aoton gvotBitwi ••&« ooeiaidwi 900*ftatta dioitor m>m tllod* Qood wvoiaidttaa oot aafmaao*

Page 522: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 523: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(6) i]^» IM «i««i laaitt fti atMwlMt, mi «•% ftlqa*

(9} hnt2lt'*ffil

^^^''y*^** **9*> 9« 6» 9ol«. and «A a» 3« tn>l* 14«

pt»prU» •9& v|yt«*« 4i?lni toralntas •« lAm mf&imiim M

f

(10) J'^ loU »t Xntaiia«. Il» l.« SS« V9l« 9» i^« 609lit ^«r taev «!

bU qpuw ^OM fMdlmt «l ftont M^a* Mft iiltSeNM fMrtaM, ««•«Mt lax aaUa« ««;,«? ^oaa ixra&lelt 1«k «eti^t» ^^r^ ln%<ftl«etiuit

«l alii tviMftlftMt »«i«r li»raB« Ittt f«U» am «••«« «fr«etlv«iMwwtai «M'£>9fa&itM* Xtft ••« In q«»U^«I tinlv«rt9t «pMrt«t•ttm Ite In aedlB* lii»l«iai «mm awaatan eidlHt«iiwm «4tBlv«^lte««ni SnUtlaetiMlifl «•• quod fit In |^«b •« in Intalloetul9*lu»« Jtm •a%«Mi fa«a« «0% MUnAwrat qf»A a&m mt in m

Ull ^m e|t» . a« i>« »3g»>

^^) ^ #!.** ^* ^* ^9 ^^« B* ?• ^^^^ ^^^*^ *^«i* *te MDl* AMtm«S^3tT3 • atQCii^UiVif l»8|pl»€, %«MM ptcafmiato olHa m««M aaaalltUllKui «aMnMQ«a tua^ at1»rllnn&1»ir« mm awvar atnt at

tamdUut^ur eUoa aaaat^Ulft* a«d aoEtalllicar ial>awitir tol&aMflMM ad avftna at raaat^ « •«aaiblllbu«, ale«t entaaan

yftaaai «t lat^dll^mllAa at aaliMMHai aa ^mi afttartit elm*MMiMll* Mii»tiMa| Mtloalfiaada, at lnt«lll^«HA» aantlbUIwi^aKl4ltfttaat «• pim tee laoivlt <i«Mtr«r« da ai^paa, at &.%

mA»mk ismibt&it aolaotlani aaHliawl *m»

SfOai .^B^ftlti^* *'^* ^* ^* Q* 14« a« S, p» 4» ad i, t»1« m,»• mat 'llPiiC at Xntaill^ . IX» l» A, ml, 9» |>« Sisit,

Page 524: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 525: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* a%«rt

881

(15) i« Int. »1; tnflU^ii^ II» 1» 0, Tol. 0, ?• ei6*#

(16) '-^fff,fmr nu &0 lfi# «»i« e» P* 3&^« ^i* <«*« IntaiWJttti

pdMlMils li^»« li^«U«tttM« tlwit at p9tmM». »ota», ^^walo

fld tmtm ttxtofettrt «ed hoe iJOtUsif^an Mt is intidlASta m«Md tot^l«(iti» ct intcUeetua sont id«m £»ia&Uter«

ef* Afta > 7* 10»iiM-«t «wt«d f«oa the

silOTJ^^' •

'"'''^"» ^ *• ftwuafl In -..cactl^ .'i-iorasii

r«td ilii« f«x«ttla in ". »4^ «&l«h lui m* hl^Ojr

qw6 Mt ^da iUlteXli ;t'i^ e« &nt«llMtwi raKt eiool*

(If) tm tot. 1 liit«lilf^«, U, I, 6. VOX. f, !>• 6i01ii Itft laaMi

miod Mt ftettw InttlUctM ftgtnkiii. •at IMraft «t ifit«Ueetua

pMsl^Uls •% eiwB 9»>a lataiigltati ham m$m too fiMBlan

«a «•«• lnt«&l«etu«tl« oalao otmt noiWM «l pftt«itlA««««*

ju et Qiil& ount cmlao potCDtl&o, Mat «iia ontoo p«vfoetiono«^ eoodWiam fMnMUBt •« i4o» on* «»» sKtroaiQit* p«rfieitt lan«

•Cfo ogtittit wrt* ^mtL tmtmm Ml vaft« intoUi^tor* Auftlt «•

9«%«ntlo in ••%««» tt q»»d ^ooolUlo daeit In aatun*

(16) loe. eit« . s»* SlUt fii tMbnetlo ottstt^.^lnfecait^ttt

(19) Xoc« eU» . 5lO%i lp»« ••* S^mm •a«l» tnt«IX«etuo oceaaOiMi

M»o«aoA kiibtt Uit«Ui«lUlf| 2g|g[^» 1U» I9 9« v<»l« ^* P«

S&H$ SntoIlMttift tMnaai* Mt* <sta tnha«r«« poostliUi et

intolll^Uliteo df MtioM *dtntto provonUno**** ^^ o»»«o« of

«» iafc^XootftO fo»«iAl» to »t. AX*«t U TOfioo. at. Alport

mo>|Sm Ir 4ot i&illiiiwitel gtrtP>ttlett»ai. Itolthiir

iiX«»aa«v of A«h»^M«iua. iwMo larooxt. tho !Abor <to Cftofltfl*

AilEin&i« Alfox&M* f^lcmm^ aX^wwX nor AwttSSoiSwtet« m&l^jfiA «^e ^.r*9<^« In aii^ flvottt bo ootOd hftvo roo4

tlHB twtl&n of LntcXXoct ao fom of *b«t A»«to«i

«ftHo it' iwt In ATari>oo8« Awrtooo orXtoo

%lAt ?t>o 3 dootrliM ftwi ho hioooXf toofbM

t)»t eXXoot ojgrfoo ao for aao. •Ujjm&mmoj^, < .44«*4f| f« l?»*«8iMSj f» IfiOnBWff^^lip.t )r Avonrooo «t otetl ooo i;»oo«ntX?«

(aOJ :-a xnt, fct iHflUga. II, l* fi» P. SXaw Wl« •nt« «*1«0 <JA«l-

tor intekxootao in offoota offXeitiir potMitU latoUaettxoi

of# op. olt., 8, p. 6XSA« «t por Id qnoA In offootn •meitary

Page 526: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 527: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

9%» AiUrt

tt pl«» sm Mat* jyonitw in «tt•»%«• Ite* lit|^icttti^ in

('^^ M iftntiT' ^^^« ^» ^ ^^ ^ ^ '^'^ ^'^^ **^ iiife«U«etat

m^gtm'M \XiMttm ^imtae^m srtmli»tofwi «!• mtUim pm

imit tEOMA iiipHT'iiwimi fKl%nt tet«&i«e^«* agg«m tdooiit

t^^ -^» iaiiait III* 3» Ui p« ssi^da ^SiW M»««» asa4»ticn» la

^'^^ ^&L.^»££S^* ^^* ^* BS, •• S, ad 4» I, «bU se, p« «7tet

iwi «nt^ M^ratue nisi in p9t«ar^i«t oMtJasstas auten aetat

r ^^« re j.a!faft, Uw> ^^}* * ^* *^®^' **^ Imm •in» quo

•jj^Mffttor iat«U«Bt»» Ue«t l«« nM ttni^v ««ta •oajoaotioftfii

«it iat«ll«»t^ j«MtbiUt ^dLfr tfeSMB «rt Myaietao*

**^^ ^?« ^^¥«»f i^* ei$> * P» 386li* "S*»il« ^'^ .afe«rt »@eH1>w «vii

W o^t^mH it i» ttt i» tamni. la tita »m» fiktf^«ii9 wm t*

tiui fi0«Kti<Kat» fffMB AlflueiMI* Itt Af«niM«» Itaiiw ftf «i«

field tcKtml fIdeUtgr t« ^v«m>«« it«rtt «a3. in t^ tetit of

a» th« MMiffM* <sf« Atrggwat. f»« ein* tou tarn 9$, f* tVfttiO-

Agist iat<^lfwt« th« iMt «i^per«t« int«Ulswo«« •« Minei9%mA to th« ^— " ' •^U«et m» h »m tot t^ ««f«4«9««xl dMMnot talst tN^ <- '^ in iSNKfWow mI in 3t« iklbcvtf

0f• j^lfnam t ft ltt.t^fet|f fft« Oila»a« in

•• a» »oi«« vol* ^» i»« %osi>*

Page 528: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 529: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(i^} -^ j^caSm^ lilt ;5, U. vol. B, i?. Sje^te*

(30 J i^nia«Cjr«t«. Sit «!• C"'^» «• i» "*^«» Wl. 36, p. ^aeob,

a7r>^>a«> :Ssoi> II. tt. 10. q. W. «. 8. «»1« WX« 33. p. ^^^^^i

1^^ i.x, 9.1. p> 2M ««l 2B6.

I9S} Itf. JllfttfeM. 01. Pit. , ?. 130, 1. 179- 0. 121. 1. 239} cf.

{»i Mv '_-^ Ub. Vl .'iftt. . . I. 0«I?* ». f« ft» «»1« 8|^ "aT-oV. .' • ¥, 00^'. 6. f. 2Qv eoi. I.

it. oi i' *-^ pooltiwi oa *fe« ptoU««» vaAMt

(36J qu..^ - ^.

- '- -^ -»> •» 1. «A. n. f9l. as.

ef. Alfa«»M^ Qg^ Ollb . p. lai. X. ;JW-ir34, X, 314,

(39) De Unitato inteUootma. oiy?. fi. vol. 9, i;. 464*. «t am oot

n&olitUv oonvWkt opoolcwitfttm otwi oft lnt«Uis«iftlM

«aa« fOBlt r.^ o:>oBlooitws it ito p<v omm« «m*

v«Bt«B8 ^awa «bA« dopezsaol •oennaoB ooito mo*iMOoMtt liiu ot IntrtlUr. H, X, 9. wU «

{9$) u i ». li9o. Pit. I Eo« m%m IntolXoBttii asoin*

. > ^ . »«.r oar^it oA iatittXoBtaa AivtaoB. q«i oot- et oottoa •ettl«n...«xtondit oo la XaninlDao SatoXllg^oa-

Aomdeas ^radaHDi «d intoUootan oi pXioon dlviiMWi

«x UtAm oai agoirtle in Xwsin IntoXXl^cnlilftO, 0%

>«viit at «A lat^Xaetm ^ol.

Page 530: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 531: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

St* Al%«vt

(40) a* iBt* •% iBlMlllg»« .X^ !• fi. ]?• MB%| «iM««Ml MftMi

'imBllflljJllH «49«rSj)9IMI iBftiUflOt: ItOtt^V

iMMUMw* ^ «•% «» a« «»«*• ^ i«» te-

«w«ten mtttie Ullos «r6iaia tffiel^tf la ^

In ftU<sao, rt% la « »«8tta(att» ^mwtm ev^ lp»t»u..

of, m>eg CO Caa&tot feS* ol». t p» 9# »• 3t1»** i* 1&-17* •%

•iadlllit all^' "& ri^Sinm imi^t ^pa6 est eoi^M «mi nisi

9mvai&m <|««i «•% roe t«o«^te| ef* iMd* , i>« U» p* IfC

»« 32 ana 33*

ftOTTSiiSSwptrt^tlonlfi ©t late llaetoa^ a«a sodms

iNw» 9Mrf«eil» «iw« in bee vt%» wn ;«%«»* iMMliit*

OMittiMelt «at«i ploa «* pl«a (weaadji *:«« 9«»

(44) B«jaita»* HI, 3. U* wU e, p. 5S8ai*» of* i^^^

fiaont In lp««» n»trtN liil«aa««i«lM «a«iU8, •« aoa a»

alio ttftaiiilettlo* ' « tiaA iftfi«»a «KUliie thU «»9%

SS^w T0eAt teM ftatm dlepooltlo tntftlXiOtaa 8»««rl»Il«

Page 532: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 533: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

$^ Allwrt

iditi^ 9t« AllMtt fi«& latf fajji|BAt«ta» wam^oM in «&§• yliiM*l«t 08 ««ar 1^1^ FM^tv B«^ VetisTO* !=• that tbf Widtii|r

^^ ^g °Vi*'^**^ *^ ^*^ **^ i.aAgw»M«» totted

(46) g»itt>l«>> m. a» >U 5* p. OSTb.

i4?) tog* eit# . 9*

^«8ei% «b1m»9 xdsi a«laa«t lllod «d 0«iM.le primmfm*St 14«o doecat ibilose^ hl« ^a&& aliqula ^^ttr s^mntlanMi« mmt%am «l> 1(«B|»iHr«« tKto «•%• ftb lwitfln>Mll1«t •« MMi*

t^lUaaOa flA aA divim ^oUMAt* ef* su Mlxnrt i» la*HimmmA Mt «aljr I9 ^m A«aM«M •a «!&• ^ia« tei liT ^«t inr«qai«taai «it eor wMtiriOt <^odmi vtQitiMORt in te,

Ubid«}« S9W SU aigMHOM «^« J41?. I. ,r "-aaiomw* «&£>• I,

t^ S» W S&9 eol« €l^*,

(^^ !• tot. M immi^t. . II, i» lu, Tou 9« p« Bsmn mm maSmilvixmm «t osp^MttioiMn hm ^)«rfiotttat aiai a «it«ri* MipaMtett«t aoliGMi QMd aon mi^hmib%hv aiai a1» miaa hmmm i?«rfMt»itptifttiMiti a|^(flp««t icit^jr, 4W4, 9«r MfiAiMtiNa a MtrtNtiia

tat«U««tiiii ad MM AtnaiMi »a>«Mirt<iifw J^anwli oacfeaa y«da«»tto BOB fit 2MHr iRt«ULietQ» wwiiKt tiirta iU«ap» intaliasttm

lMtb«t «a« •ejddtal^ in ••«• «t aKp«iati«M divlmt tit^ me»aaawMMkHa 9«r tataUaotna Imalata «ai at !«• habit f&tat«t ^tguBm^ »^ « a»t«rta aaaipi^ ftmaa divtaaa**** fi»Ma nanaat aiiffiai«gat«r faeta diirlna ^«r hva ^gsmA affioitur intel}«««>

taa foi Oiaitidr la «ftt9ta val Mutual a aft ^viaa fit -^laAi^aatai aaaiadlantan^ at mm ««! vaaatat divinait %•aaeO, at »a anjojs an aainaat poaiti;m in iihe «af»aagr of thauniTaraa far* aa ^Snad ta a lM»djr» it eeta aa a mmw af ^OmratotB af tha afirttwpial warld ta i3o<i» :Ma la m* AliNvt^aaiQ)raaaian af trie aaaa Idaa lO^ich is fatand in l^a iaaada«»

fiiai^aitta* For tha iaaitA»««lanytitta» ef• Pa Swaa^UatJjfa'*^ Biara«ohi&9 oa^^)* ^ ^^^ d« IC« >• CU vol* 9« aal« 60Mi» «adl

Caalaati KLttti , oa<>» iv* no* s, S!* i^* <«• 3^ (Lat*

1.), 001. rjj^vtrans]

Page 534: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 535: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

5«, AXbmft

tm

(601 loo» cit > „- »^~- n%ift iMfclaa* «••« ^viam «* op««%l«a«»

«t wtft! <»rta» Bon laSl@«t, e» feott aa»%«rta]ii« «it

SMitvoBf -^ mh ««oli^'i% awwndiai aaluurMi at^ »A

imwA : m MftttttiM%ars via* igitajf ft^ttaR^lM•« fifliKMtste. in «nr« Sivlno in «bw« ^!«if«dtftt ^la total

|aftiB>«Bdiiw« «f ttw ho49 «iA M Vittft in ^|jM^IU g^ gtt> .

p. 1M» U 8MHBfii»——

"

(^^^ b^* »it* « tt Hat oUfcfirtB^ iMi«a«»M naOMm ^%tig%m •%

p«r wKMtt dev«rti«M iid MtwMke j^9li;»» oaat d%«aa«« MemSswi

«•»» SUM a«e«Mi«a«itt et »i0 e«itiswaxi%Br t«4iel

l«Mftn1tii«t1» •% f«Ueitettt attenM*

(B8I Smu flg Crwit*> lig Q. &6» a* 6« Ml ^«M«t, a, toX. 36,

itit«U«etaa ««% A intcl aita« rteat «« «m« •tswi

«nH Ate »s«B*««

^. _, .., hft®c «»t w,t&x> <mt AltemU in libto Ce IntUloettt

•« iat«Ui^1aUi**»«iKfci%ir «iitt «ft M boOt <3^(^ «it«aflftt

«aaM« ^BBT* antaft 9»«itit «H in oewpoM* at aeilioet

sOlpiMMLtiir intfiiUeetttia «k intclli^Iibaa , «r di»oi^li»es)«

«i 9W ))ftl)ttAt rMieva iaB»ftaUt«tl«« m sic tem «0t fatia

«t ftrti»i of. 2£aJt&Sp* t»» », «. W, «. 8» »• 208^Ft t6«» AUwpttMBa i' lillro &• int«U«eta «t tntelil^Uli

^ta0« i»t«il«otai in «k41nui latAlMtia adipliteitwr «*p«i««t ^rA «•« 4m laaaa noma* Bt 1A«» dieit i%M«n %aoa memStSl ^ocdffinuxt in tali int«tlleottt iwOieatt i«HMPt«littttift

•nleMht, sua atow Wiflig itsairt»Ut»ti» <aw» oH *^m9 ia

tto !>• i«taaa«ta t Inlailaoltfw iilfti»M# Mrnvwr, tut

t]MQ^ ar^>Maa«d i^' ti^o jphtnaa ia da«i4aipad tti«r« at

p« ia4, 1, ;3i3&«

(S6) T^ la^Uaata 0t IntlUlidMll. H. I. hi. P. C31«.

Page 536: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 537: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

1^7

snuooitAi^

I.

2* /<

e AttlWb (8MM«i QWMUI aq^itt* in /«!•%• It^

•• —^i^^^—iiiS* ^^* ^» *JW»*i i'«ifia, 1^0*

9» «»«<;e«» rxi Stt%8twf«>la OtWg. T«nl««9 Jtmtea, 1675»

II. --^

, Ztiiiimuituic. iSW*

LttSulSaajBt

Page 538: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 539: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

S • Albiart

^' MUi iHnft«CaMM€lWMl9 wlo« haw •j^^'WMdU

*• ^^"^^ hiuioS, Ho ii» imgmiU<h ana tJaholaailWU"-

as. -~-ijl>«Mi« (t U point t* awBrt f Jan* •xo* (A«alil«« tlitat.

Page 540: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 541: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

SS&

£9, —^co,..Tit uc It-. .>Mlo«>^ie aaaierOt^ 2 y»U« i«rt», l»3««

.#n&tt <rt

L« '(Se^ag'K l^tr^e/irtl^'

Vii'

i^iii^ l

34* '^»ffi^gy» <

111, {^JitlUet

«* -'^lff!ft^«»

3S« Ife. a^^T^IggLltrg^^IT^1b#n

4

4Ci m;i^gtyysa 'an;rtfni!tii' usr"41

?raTEKEEF» ,Jto Mm iBh, «»> . — - .--. a

Page 542: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 543: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

!• a, itli«r0%« AXHr*

mo

***• '^Ifc:

4'AiwwTwo* (smtM ir«e*»

Ittrs,

T W«»

"* aa^imjS i>.--

47« "••i*«j v.'^aBaasteip-^*^

49. "-^^^ ^ ^'«?tt^ ,ff-ir y>*«.s^|f|qf|j^fff| ^f^p Vrt«. i-wFU, MS4.

Page 544: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 545: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

&« a, idUiat* AlWrt

Ah'b»t the aroftt* .it«t J&JISSSL

Aloa&sui l.0t*

j^mmiM MwMtmm 4» US*iXmmam of Apteodislati eft* si2»

iafaanas of v3ca«nx»t ItM*

iie« si2» S68, j»a» m$mJAttfA of soMHtiai (af^6du«

Jl0ttS^i ldA» I06t Ul, U3» U9*gl6» 0»5, as3e» f^>l, 2&4«

^vle%9%l«« l«4it9 1* ^9 6* ?• &• ,

l», 14^ 109 17, 18, '46^ »l9

8S9469 Gl* M* 9S, 1179 U99|S3, 1S&, 140. 157, 170, 100,

ISS, lOd, 195, 198, :£01, 20&2,

K04, i^;^, ^:^'^1«

A«fMlit»«9 »t*3 i«ilt» 89 4, d, 41-48,

49, 51, 72, 98, Mf , 167, 178,

173, 131, 13«, ISe, I9U, ::0C,

iil69 &gC9 SHOt S96» S4l9 2^9,

Avle«nnss 2, &«9, 1^VK» I&-I69 3&9

379 49, 51, 56, C6, 07, OS, 93,

93, 104, ICX, Ul, lli!}, 119,r^i!, 141, lUf IGQ, 1G5, ia7,

ITS, 178, 1999 UQ» mh 3^» 31G4» 8»y«u SUS.

109, I909l»»4979 1999 »{%« «C»9

ia&9 8I89 S9&9 iBf09 flansse, e«s»

844, M7, aft9, ttMMOe./V«I««»MI »9 6V» M* US<4189 l^* 1^

141, 156-1S8, 140, ltf-448, 168,SIS. 299-43419 ^^9 8989 ^^«

Sttngiiiiftlaui 9t Hi»i I94«SarlEDftfAi 1»4«

c«iMaii 216*

CMCloOMnuit 49 1&9*C4ll«0%ltnM$ 69 ^^€»»lawlwiNLqB»t 19O9 1919

834*

Stiawrtt less* SIS* 314.

190 jjgM^«

Oftult ld7» 109* 199*

QMsrmtt 199, sio.

r4lt»ert of j^nitlcvfts 99*

141, ISO* mr, m».ailmm &0, 190, 1S04<«OQ9

ai* »iit9 li^ ^t*ntt, i»l9 8989 IM4*

£449 l^t '^*ai^»y;r «r BfiMit 1909 »d^

812*

Xte GoMsroli TS9 aiO*

49M of £MmH»»* a«»t 99

64* 187, SIS, S17«

49Hm of i^^tti 109«

lift* 191.Bofneuei, »t»t 3, 4, 1G8« ;.-t>bltW! 313«

Page 546: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 547: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

lU .• mum

i)t*« 218*tee, 197* 2i2j«

Sld, S19» 2$3»

S00» 80t» SIS*

i»«^8f i67« soe«itietert 106*

191*

mwi(il«ui or ivaamm 286k!l»t«iidN30WMlSn« 2S0» SSi«

:^S2, 2^6, £89*faOsHOU 144» a^» SHS9«

ifttfrttfltrit IUL8*

SOte«iA«ri 107, 16Q, 190.

0«B«Mt 4, 188*

eo7,

!>• fftwt aaa, js39, isci*

2)t salfi 8«7*

Page 548: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 549: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great
Page 550: D. Mill, Notion of Agent Intellectus in St.Albert the Great

(/

l;i ' !l


Recommended