+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: akando
View: 27 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather. By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, L. Gromova, N. Iucci, D. Ivanus,. O . Kryakunova , A. Levitin, M . Parisi, N . Ptitsyna, M. Tyasto, E. Vernova, G. Villoresi, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
31
Japan, ICRC 2003 Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather By Lev Dorman for INTAS team (A. Belov, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, L. Gromova, N. Iucci, D. Ivanus,. O. Kryakunova , A. Levitin, M. Parisi, N. Ptitsyna, M. Tyasto, E. Vernova, G. Villoresi, V. Yanke)
Transcript
Page 1: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and

Space Weather

By Lev Dorman for INTAS team(A. Belov, L. Dorman,, E. Eroshenko, L. Gromova, N. Iucci,

D. Ivanus,. O. Kryakunova , A. Levitin, M. Parisi, N. Ptitsyna, M. Tyasto, E. Vernova, G. Villoresi,

V. Yanke)

Page 2: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

AbstractResults of the INTAS Project, which aims to improve the methods of safeguarding satellites in the Earth’s magnetosphere from the negative effects of the space environment, are presented. Anomaly data from the “Kosmos” series satellites in the period 1971–1999 are combined in one database, together with similar information on other spacecrafts. This database contains, beyond the anomaly information, various characteristics of the space weather: geomagnetic activity indices (Ap, AE and Dst), fluxes and fluencies of electrons and protons at different energies, high energy cosmic ray variations and other solar, interplanetary and solar wind data. A comparative analysis of the distribution of each of these parameters relative to satellite anomalies was carried out for the total number of anomalies (about 6000 events), and separately for high (5000 events) and low (about 800 events) altitude orbit satellites. No relation was found between low and high altitude satellite anomalies. Daily numbers of satellite anomalies, averaged by a superposed epoch method around sudden storm commencements and proton event onsets for high (>1500 km) and low (<1500 km) altitude orbits revealed a big difference in a behavior. Satellites were divided on several groups according to the orbital characteristics (altitude and inclination). The relation of satellite anomalies to the environmental parameters was found to be different for various orbits that should be taken into account under developing of the anomaly frequency models.

Page 3: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Satellite anomaly data

The main contribution was from NGDC satellite anomaly database, created by J. Allen and D. Wilkinson.

+“Kosmos” data (circular orbit at 800 km altitude and 74º inclination)

+1994 year anomalies - Walter Thomas report (Thomas, 1995).

+

The satellites characteristics - from different Internet sources:http://spacescience.nasa.gov/missions/index.htmhttp://www.skyrocket.de/space/index2.htmhttp://hea-www.harvard.edu/QEDT/jcm/space/jsr/jsr.htmlhttp://www.astronautix.com/index.htm

Page 4: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Satellite and Anomaly Number

~300 satellites~6000 satellite anomalies

Page 5: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Red, Green and Blue Groups

Page 6: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Period with big number of satellite anomalies

Upper panel – cosmic ray activity near the Earth: variations of 10 GV cosmic ray density; solar proton (> 10 MeV and >60 MeV) fluxes.

Lower panel – geomagnetic activity: Kp- and Dst-indices.

Vertical arrows on the upper panel correspond to the malfunction moments.

Page 7: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Other example

Upper panel – cosmic ray activity near the Earth: variations of 10 GV cosmic ray density; electron (> 2 MeV) fluxes – hourly data.

Vertical arrows correspond to the malfunction moments. Lower row – all malfunctions.

Lower panel – geomagnetic activity: Kp- and Dst-indices.

Page 8: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Seasonal dependence

Anomaly’s frequency (all orbits)with statistical errors

27-day averaged frequencies and correspondinghalf year wave

Page 9: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Seasonal dependence

Satellite anomalies frequency and Ap-index averaged over the period 1975-1994. The curve with points is the 27-day running mean values; the grey band corresponds to the 95 % confidence interval. The sinusoidal curve is a semiannual wave with maxima in equinoxes best fitting the frequency data.

Page 10: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Seasonal dependence (different orbits)

27-day averaged frequencies and correspondinghalf year wave for different satellite groups

Page 11: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Time distribution of anomalies

Page 12: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Space Weather IndicesSolar activity Solar windGeomagnetic activitySolar protonsElectronsGround Level Cosmic Rays

~30 indices in total

Page 13: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Solar activity

27-day running averaged Sunspot Numbers and Solar Radio Flux

We use

SSN and F10.7 – daily Sunspot Numbers and radio fluxes;

SSN27, SSN365 – 1 year and 1 rotation running averaged SSN

Page 14: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Geomagnetic activity

Daily Ap-index and minimal (for this day) Dst-index

We use

Apd, Apmax – daily and maximal Ap-index;

AEd, AEmax – daily and maximal AE-index; DSTd, DSTmin – daily and minimal Dst-index;

Page 15: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Protons and electrons

Daily proton and electron fluencies

We use

p10, p100 – daily proton (>10, >100 MeV) fluencies (GOES);

p10d, p60d – daily proton (>10, >60 MeV) fluxes (IMP);

p10max, p60max – maximal hourly proton (>10, >60 MeV) fluxes (IMP); e2 – daily electron (>2 MeV) fluence (GOES); e2d, e2max – daily and maximal electron (>2 MeV) fluх (GOES);

Page 16: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Solar Wind

Daily solar wind speed and intensity of interplanetary magnetic field

We use

Vsw, Vmax – daily and maximal solar wind speed;

Bm – daily IMF intensity; Bzd, Bzmin – daily and minimal z-component IMF (GSM); Bznsum – sum of negative z-component values;

Page 17: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Cosmic Ray Activity Indices +

Daily CRA-indices and sum of negative IMF z-component

We use da10, CRA – indices of cosmic ray activity, obtained from

ground level CR observations (Belov et al., 1999); Eakd, Eakmax – estimation of daily and maximal energy, transferred

from solar wind to magnetosphere (Akasofu, 1987);

Page 18: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

SSC and anomalies

Averaged behavior of satellite anomalies frequency near Sudden Storm Commencements

634 days with SSC in total

a – all stormsb – storms with Ap>50 nTc – storms with Ap>80 nT

Page 19: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

SSC and anomalies Averaged behavior

Ap, Dst – indices of geomagnetic activity and satellite malfunction frequency near Sudden Storm Commencements

Malfunctions start later and last longer than magnetic storms

Page 20: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Proton events and anomaliesAveraged behavior of p>10, p>100 MeV and satellite malfunction frequency during proton event periods.The enhancement with >300 pfu were used

Page 21: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Proton events and anomalies

Mean satellite anomaly frequencies in 0- and 1-days of proton enhancements

in dependence on the maximal > 10 MeV flux

Page 22: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Proton events and anomalies

Probability of any anomaly (high altitude – high inclination group) in dependence on the maximal proton > 10 and >60 MeV flux

Page 23: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Proton and electron hazardson the different orbits

Mean proton and electron fluencies on the anomaly day

Page 24: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Anomalies and different indices (precursors)

Mean behavior of Ap-index in anomaly periods (GEO satellites)

Page 25: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Anomalies and different indices (precursors)

Mean behavior of >2 MeV electron fluence in anomaly periods (GEO satellites)

Page 26: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Anomalies and different indices (precursors)

Mean behavior of solar wind speed in anomaly periods (GEO satellites)

Page 27: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Models of the anomaly frequency

Example of frequency model (GEO):

We checked ~ 30 different Space Weather parameters and a lot of their combinations

We used the parameters for anomaly day and for several preceding days

Only simplest linear regression models were checked (exclusions for e and p indices)

Obtained models contain 3-8 different geo- heliophysical parameters

The models appear to be different for different satellite groups

3

5

2

5

5

52.1

4

13 Bz105.1Vsw109.1Ap103.8e2104.1f HL

da10105.1sf102)d60p(106.1)100p(101.1 4375.0435.04

Page 28: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Models of the anomaly frequencyhigh alt.- low incl.

cc=0.39

e>2 MeVApd, AEd, sfp60d, p100

VswBzd, da10

low alt.-high incl.

cc=0.2

e>2 MeVCRAApd, AEd, sfVsw, Bzd

high alt.-high incl. cc=0.7

p>100 MeV, p60d Eak, Bznsum, SSN365

Page 29: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

SEP FORECAST STEPS

(FROM POSTER PS-18)

1. AUTOMATICALLY DETERMINATION OF THE SEP EVENT START BY NEUTRON MONITOR DATA

2. DETERMINATION OF ENERGY SPECTRUM OUT OF MAGNETOSPHERE BY THE METHOD OF COUPLING FUNCTIONS

3. DETERMINATION OF TIME OF EJECTION, SOURCE FUNCTION AND PARAMETERS OF PROPAGATION BY SOLVING AN INVERSE PROBLEM

4. FORECASTING OF EXPECTED SEP FLUXES AND COMPARISON WITH OBSERVATIONS; CORRECTION OF THE INVERSE PROBLEM SOLUTION

5. COMBINED FORECASTING ON THE BASIS OF NEUTRON MONITOR AND SATELLITE DATA

Page 30: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

Principles of Magnetic Storms Forecasting

Page 31: Daejeon, UN/ESA/NASA/JAXA Workshop, 20-25 Sept 2009 Satellite Anomalies and Space Weather

Japan, ICRC 2003

SummaryThe relation between Space Weather parameters

and frequency of satellite anomalies are different for different satellite groups (orbits)

The models simulated anomaly frequency in different orbits are developed and could be adjusted for forecasting (mainly energetic particles and magnetic activity)

The models for forecasting of energetic particle events and magnetic activity can be developed in near future on the basis of ground and satellite observations


Recommended