+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher...

Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher...

Date post: 20-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ashley-rose
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
71
Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on and Impacts on Interpretation Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 Metr 4803 April 14, 2005 April 14, 2005
Transcript
Page 1: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on InterpretationImpacts on Interpretation

Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on InterpretationImpacts on Interpretation

Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB)Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB)

Jami Boettcher (WDTB)Jami Boettcher (WDTB)

Metr 4803Metr 4803

April 14, 2005April 14, 2005

Page 2: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

OverviewOverviewOverviewOverview

• Data QualityData Quality– Product characteristicsProduct characteristics– Operator interventionOperator intervention

• Non-Meteorological ReturnsNon-Meteorological Returns

• Data Quality and the NWS Warning ProcessData Quality and the NWS Warning Process

Page 3: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Where’s the Weather?Where’s the Weather?Where’s the Weather?Where’s the Weather?

Page 4: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

WSR-88D Data QualityWSR-88D Data QualityWSR-88D Data QualityWSR-88D Data Quality

• Ground Clutter and Anomalous PropagationGround Clutter and Anomalous Propagation

• Range FoldingRange Folding

• Velocity Folding => Improperly Dealiased Velocity Folding => Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesVelocities

Page 5: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Ground ClutterGround Clutter(Normal)(Normal)

Ground ClutterGround Clutter(Normal)(Normal)

• Reflectivity: high power, lacking smooth gradientsReflectivity: high power, lacking smooth gradients

Page 6: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Ground ClutterGround Clutter(Normal)(Normal)

Ground ClutterGround Clutter(Normal)(Normal)

• Velocity: generally near zeroVelocity: generally near zero

Page 7: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Anomalous Propagation (AP)Anomalous Propagation (AP)Anomalous Propagation (AP)Anomalous Propagation (AP)

• Transient form of clutter contaminationTransient form of clutter contamination

• Beam is refracting more than standardBeam is refracting more than standard– Nocturnal cooling in valleysNocturnal cooling in valleys– Behind cold fronts, dry linesBehind cold fronts, dry lines

Page 8: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

• Reflectivity: high power, lacking smooth gradients, Reflectivity: high power, lacking smooth gradients, radially orientedradially oriented

Page 9: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

• Velocity: generally near zeroVelocity: generally near zero

Page 10: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

Anomalous PropagationAnomalous Propagation(Transient)(Transient)

• Spectrum Width: generally lowSpectrum Width: generally low

Page 11: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Clutter SuppressionClutter SuppressionOperator DefinedOperator Defined

Clutter SuppressionClutter SuppressionOperator DefinedOperator Defined

Page 12: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Clutter SuppressionClutter SuppressionOperator DefinedOperator Defined

Clutter SuppressionClutter SuppressionOperator DefinedOperator Defined

• Geographic regions definedGeographic regions defined– Type of suppressionType of suppression

– Bypass Map for normal clutter Bypass Map for normal clutter – All Bins for transient clutter (AP)All Bins for transient clutter (AP)

– Level of suppressionLevel of suppression

Page 13: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleReflectivityReflectivity

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleReflectivityReflectivity

Page 14: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleVelocityVelocity

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleVelocityVelocity

Page 15: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleReflectivityReflectivity

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleReflectivityReflectivity

Page 16: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleVVelocityelocity

AP Removal ExampleAP Removal ExampleVVelocityelocity

Page 17: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality Improvement

Page 18: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality Improvement

Page 19: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

• No suppression appliedNo suppression applied

Page 20: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVeVelocitylocity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVeVelocitylocity

• No No suppressionsuppression appliedapplied

Page 21: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

• Normal clutter suppression appliedNormal clutter suppression applied

Page 22: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVVelocityelocity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVVelocityelocity

• Normal clutter suppression appliedNormal clutter suppression applied

Page 23: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalReflectivityReflectivity

• AP and Normal clutter suppression appliedAP and Normal clutter suppression applied

Page 24: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVeVelocitylocity

AP and Normal Clutter RemovalAP and Normal Clutter RemovalVeVelocitylocity

• AP and Normal clutter suppression appliedAP and Normal clutter suppression applied

Page 25: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality Improvement

Page 26: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality ImprovementData Quality Improvement

Page 27: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Inappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression Applied

• All Bins, High suppression in Batch tiltsAll Bins, High suppression in Batch tilts

Page 28: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Inappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression Applied

• All Bins, High suppression in Batch tiltsAll Bins, High suppression in Batch tilts

Page 29: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Inappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression AppliedInappropriate Suppression Applied

• All Bins, High suppression in Batch tiltsAll Bins, High suppression in Batch tilts

Page 30: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Inappropriate Suppression Inappropriate Suppression CorrectedCorrected

Inappropriate Suppression Inappropriate Suppression CorrectedCorrected

• Bypass Map suppression in Batch tiltsBypass Map suppression in Batch tilts

Page 31: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Range FoldingRange FoldingRange FoldingRange Folding

• Result of multiple trip echoes Result of multiple trip echoes

• For velocity data, high PRFs needed to For velocity data, high PRFs needed to minimize velocity foldingminimize velocity folding– Doppler Dilemma: high PRFs mean short RDoppler Dilemma: high PRFs mean short Rmaxmax

• Purple typically used to denote velocity data Purple typically used to denote velocity data unavailable due to range foldingunavailable due to range folding

Page 32: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Range FoldingRange FoldingRange FoldingRange Folding

Page 33: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Range FoldingRange FoldingWarning Forecaster’s NightmareWarning Forecaster’s Nightmare

Range FoldingRange FoldingWarning Forecaster’s NightmareWarning Forecaster’s Nightmare

Page 34: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Range FoldingRange FoldingWarning Forecaster’s NightmareWarning Forecaster’s Nightmare

Range FoldingRange FoldingWarning Forecaster’s NightmareWarning Forecaster’s Nightmare

Page 35: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Range FoldingRange FoldingOperator InterventionOperator Intervention

Range FoldingRange FoldingOperator InterventionOperator Intervention

• Doppler PRFs can be Doppler PRFs can be manually selectedmanually selected– Will shift RWill shift Rmaxmax andand

distribution of purpledistribution of purple

Page 36: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

PRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF Selection

BWER

Page 37: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

PRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF Selection

PRF #8Rmax ~ 63 nm

Page 38: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

PRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF SelectionPRF Selection

PRF #4Rmax ~ 95 nm

Page 39: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Velocity FoldingVelocity FoldingVelocity FoldingVelocity Folding

• WSR-88D uses a Velocity Dealiasing AlgorithmWSR-88D uses a Velocity Dealiasing Algorithm– Sometimes velocities are improperly dealiased Sometimes velocities are improperly dealiased

Page 40: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased Velocities

• Most likely on “leading” edge of stormsMost likely on “leading” edge of storms

Page 41: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased Velocities

• Most likely on “leading” edge of stormsMost likely on “leading” edge of storms

Page 42: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased Velocities

• Next higher elevationNext higher elevation

Page 43: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased Velocities

• Next volume scanNext volume scan

Page 44: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesOperator InterventionOperator Intervention

Improperly Dealiased VelocitiesImproperly Dealiased VelocitiesOperator InterventionOperator Intervention

• Environmental Winds Environmental Winds TableTable

Page 45: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Non-Meteorological ReturnsNon-Meteorological ReturnsNon-Meteorological ReturnsNon-Meteorological Returns

• ChaffChaff

• Dust StormDust Storm

• SunspikesSunspikes

• InterferenceInterference

• Biological TargetsBiological Targets

Page 46: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

ChaffChaffChaffChaff

• Lightweight, highly reflective targetsLightweight, highly reflective targets

Page 47: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Dust StormDust StormDust StormDust Storm

• West Texas: 2 fatalitiesWest Texas: 2 fatalities

Page 48: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

SunspikesSunspikesSunspikesSunspikes

• Sun is CW Sun is CW emitteremitter

• Contiguous Contiguous returns along returns along radials at radials at sunrise and sunrise and sunsetsunset

Page 49: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

InterferenceInterferenceInterferenceInterference

• Internet transmitter at Huntington BeachInternet transmitter at Huntington Beach

Page 50: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

InterferenceInterferenceInterferenceInterference

• Privately owned ATC radar 2 mi from ILNPrivately owned ATC radar 2 mi from ILN

Page 51: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Biological TargetsBiological TargetsBirds Birds

Biological TargetsBiological TargetsBirds Birds

• Nocturnal migrationNocturnal migration

Page 52: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality and the NWS Warning Data Quality and the NWS Warning ProcessProcess

Data Quality and the NWS Warning Data Quality and the NWS Warning ProcessProcess

• Anticipation/ExpectationsAnticipation/Expectations• Product selectionProduct selection

– Thousands of choices!Thousands of choices!

• Feature recognitionFeature recognition– Aha! The intuitive responseAha! The intuitive response

• Spotter reports/ground truthSpotter reports/ground truth• Warning generation/disseminationWarning generation/dissemination

– Effective wordingEffective wording

• Non-meteorological factorsNon-meteorological factors– Situation Awareness (SA)Situation Awareness (SA)

Page 53: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Situation Awareness: The Ability to Situation Awareness: The Ability to Maintain the Big PictureMaintain the Big Picture

Situation Awareness: The Ability to Situation Awareness: The Ability to Maintain the Big PictureMaintain the Big Picture

Page 54: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

What SA is NotWhat SA is NotWhat SA is NotWhat SA is Not

“Howdy. My name is John. I am 18 years old and live in the USA.

I was born with brown hair, green eyes, and situation awareness.”

SA is not an inherent ability. It is acquired for different domains, such as driving a car

Page 55: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 1Level 1

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 1Level 1

• Perception of the elements in the environment of the elements in the environment within a volume of space within a volume of space

Is this what your decision is based on?

Or did you see this as well?

Same time…different radar

Page 56: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 2Level 2

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 2Level 2

• Comprehension of their meaning of their meaning

Did you see this?

Perceive

Hook echo with 65 dBZ in the hook debris

Now that you’ve seen this, do you understand what this is?

Page 57: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 3Level 3

Situation AwarenessSituation AwarenessLevel 3Level 3

• Projection of their status in the near futureof their status in the near future

Did you see this?

Perceive

Do you understand what this is?

(Hook echo with 65 dBZ in the hook: debris)

Comprehend

Now do you realize what is likely to happen? And what you should do?

Project

…Tornado Emergency for the OKC Metro……...

Page 58: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

SA and WorkloadSA and WorkloadSA and WorkloadSA and Workload

• Low SA, low workloadLow SA, low workload– Don’t know anything, don’t want to knowDon’t know anything, don’t want to know

• Low SA, high workloadLow SA, high workload– Don’t know anything, but am tryingDon’t know anything, but am trying

way too hard to find outway too hard to find out

• High SA, high workloadHigh SA, high workload– Do know plenty, but at great effortDo know plenty, but at great effort

(can’t keep this up for long!)(can’t keep this up for long!)

• High SA, low workloadHigh SA, low workload– Do know, and it comes steadilyDo know, and it comes steadily

– If you are not operating here….If you are not operating here….find out why and fix it!find out why and fix it!

Page 59: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

SA Demons: Workload, Anxiety, SA Demons: Workload, Anxiety, Fatigue, and Other StressorsFatigue, and Other Stressors

SA Demons: Workload, Anxiety, SA Demons: Workload, Anxiety, Fatigue, and Other StressorsFatigue, and Other Stressors

• Stress and anxiety are Stress and anxiety are likelylikely issues in the issues in the warning environmentwarning environment– Lives are at stake (sometimes office Lives are at stake (sometimes office

staff and/or family members)staff and/or family members)– Shift work and chaotic environmentShift work and chaotic environment– Humans often misjudge their own Humans often misjudge their own

ability to cope ability to cope

• WAFOS taxes attention and working WAFOS taxes attention and working memorymemory

Page 60: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Level 1 Failures: Poor Data Level 1 Failures: Poor Data QualityQuality

Level 1 Failures: Poor Data Level 1 Failures: Poor Data QualityQuality

• Most relevant data not available or obscuredMost relevant data not available or obscured– Radar sampling issues; PRF change?Radar sampling issues; PRF change?– Spotter reports?Spotter reports?

RDA

RDA

RDA

RDA

Page 61: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Level 2 Failures: What May Level 2 Failures: What May Prevent Comprehending DataPrevent Comprehending Data

Level 2 Failures: What May Level 2 Failures: What May Prevent Comprehending DataPrevent Comprehending Data

• Storm from radar A with veryStorm from radar A with veryhigh dBZs: hail suspected high dBZs: hail suspected as a threatas a threat

3 body scatter spike, which indicates very large hail

• Storm from radar B: do you Storm from radar B: do you know what the appendageknow what the appendagemeans?means?

Page 62: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Level 3 Failures: What May Level 3 Failures: What May Prevent Correctly Projecting DataPrevent Correctly Projecting Data

Level 3 Failures: What May Level 3 Failures: What May Prevent Correctly Projecting DataPrevent Correctly Projecting Data• Limited understanding of conceptual modelLimited understanding of conceptual model• Inability to assimilate strengths and limitationsInability to assimilate strengths and limitations

– Data sampling limitations may result in incorrect or Data sampling limitations may result in incorrect or ambiguous expected storm behaviorambiguous expected storm behavior

– Radar data conflicts with expectations from storm environment Radar data conflicts with expectations from storm environment

• Limited experienceLimited experience– Knowledge of local areaKnowledge of local area– Population centers, outdoor eventsPopulation centers, outdoor events

• Distractions, workloadDistractions, workload

Page 63: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Emergency Managers (EMs) and Emergency Managers (EMs) and Data Quality IssuesData Quality Issues

Emergency Managers (EMs) and Emergency Managers (EMs) and Data Quality IssuesData Quality Issues

• Modern EMs utilize radar as one of their toolsModern EMs utilize radar as one of their tools– Training?Training?

• Types of decisions EMs make: Types of decisions EMs make: – Positioning spottersPositioning spotters– Close roads/bridges preemptively for floodingClose roads/bridges preemptively for flooding– Monitor conditions for safety of spotters, Monitor conditions for safety of spotters,

responders, etc. responders, etc. – Making decisions of how best to alert the public of Making decisions of how best to alert the public of

severe weather (outdoor sirens, police sirens, severe weather (outdoor sirens, police sirens, cable TV override, etc.)cable TV override, etc.)

Page 64: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Data Quality Issues for EMs Data Quality Issues for EMs Data Quality Issues for EMs Data Quality Issues for EMs

• AP can lead to:AP can lead to:– misdirection of spottersmisdirection of spotters– spurious rainfall accumulationsspurious rainfall accumulations– no reset of storm-total rainfallno reset of storm-total rainfall

• Velocity Dealiasing/Range Folding:Velocity Dealiasing/Range Folding:– obscure significant featuresobscure significant features– misdirection of spotters due to false signaturesmisdirection of spotters due to false signatures

Page 65: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Rainfall Products are used by EMsRainfall Products are used by EMs

Severe AP problems: spurious 3+” rainfall total!

Page 66: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Rainfall Products are used by EMsRainfall Products are used by EMs

Problem could have been much worse!

AP from nearby research radar

Page 67: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

What Might an Untrained EM think?What Might an Untrained EM think?

“Man, that’s the biggest circulation I ever saw!!!”

Page 68: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

The Real Problem for the EMThe Real Problem for the EM

Velocity dealiasing failure masks real circulation difficult to direct spotters.

Page 69: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Supercell Masked at TimesSupercell Masked at Times

Velocity Dealiasing Failures and Range Folding

Page 70: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Other Data Quality Issues for EMs Other Data Quality Issues for EMs Other Data Quality Issues for EMs Other Data Quality Issues for EMs

• Emergency managers often use algorithm Emergency managers often use algorithm output output – Mesos, TVS, Hail sizeMesos, TVS, Hail size

• Any data quality issue that affects the Any data quality issue that affects the performance of Mesocyclone, TDA, SCIT, performance of Mesocyclone, TDA, SCIT, Hail, or Rainfall algorithms may impact EM Hail, or Rainfall algorithms may impact EM operationsoperations– Impact dependent on training of EMImpact dependent on training of EM

Page 71: Day 2: WSR-88D Data Quality and Impacts on Interpretation Paul Schlatter (CIMMS/WDTB) Jami Boettcher (WDTB) Metr 4803 April 14, 2005.

Questions?Questions?Questions?Questions?


Recommended