Day 5: Goals: Welfare
Daniel J. Mallinson
Political ScienceStockton University
POLS 2190
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 1 / 19
Road map
Learn about welfare as a goal of public policy
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 2 / 19
What comes to mind...... when you hear the term welfare and welfare as a goalof public policy?
Preamble to the ConstitutionWe the People of the United States, in Order toform a more perfect Union, establish Justice,insure domestic Tranquility, provide for thecommon defence, promote the generalWelfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty toourselves and our Posterity, do ordain andestablish this Constitution for the United Statesof America.
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 3 / 19
Welfare
Big Questions
How should we define welfare?
How do we distinguish need and desire?
How do we measure welfare?
How should government “promote the generalwelfare” (Preamble)
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 4 / 19
Definition of Welfare
“Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”
Difficult to define
Practically defined through differentiating need and desire
Need puts boundaries on public responsibility for welfare
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 5 / 19
Basic Definition of Need
Things necessary for survival
So what do we need that government should provide?
Definition of need is a political contest
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 6 / 19
Basic Definition of Need
Things necessary for survival
So what do we need that government should provide?
Definition of need is a political contest
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 6 / 19
Abraham Maslow
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 7 / 19
Stone’s DimensionsMaterial vs. Symbolic
Needs have symbolic meaning
Identity and culture becomes important
Political battles:
Balance of minority and majority identitiesProper accommodationsConflicting political cultures
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 8 / 19
Stone’s Dimensions
Intrinsic vs. Instrumental
Is survival enough?
What about being a productive citizen?
Instrumental reasons often given during policy debates
Appeals to collective needs
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 9 / 19
Stone’s Dimensions
Volatility vs. Security
Prospect Theory (Kahneman and Tversky)
Sensitivity to loss
Examples: Social security, Medicaid, welfare, jobless benefits
However, we still prioritize risks
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 10 / 19
Stone’s Dimensions
Quantity vs. Quality
Things that are difficult to quantify can be the most important
Examples?
How, then, do we measure welfare/well-being?
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 11 / 19
Stone’s Dimensions
Quantity vs. Quality
Things that are difficult to quantify can be the most important
Examples?
How, then, do we measure welfare/well-being?
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 11 / 19
Stone’s Dimensions
Individual Needs vs. Relational Needs
Relational needs are real, difficult to provide
Not captured by rational model
Politics forces translation into more tangible claims
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 12 / 19
Stone’s DimensionsAbsolute vs. Relative Needs
Absolute: fixed definition of need
Relative: Conditional on where you are situated
Comparison to those around you, not abstract standard
Necessities evolve
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 13 / 19
Paradox of Progress
“ This is the paradox of progress: instead of fulfillingneeds, it creates rising expectations and new needs.”(Stone, 99)
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 14 / 19
How Government Defines Need
A claim must be demanded
Some methods:
Eligibility requirementsHearings and public claimsBudgets
Public good: inherent characteristic
Public need: determined in a political process
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 15 / 19
How Government Defines Need
A claim must be demanded
Some methods:
Eligibility requirementsHearings and public claimsBudgets
Public good: inherent characteristic
Public need: determined in a political process
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 15 / 19
How Government Defines Need
A claim must be demanded
Some methods:
Eligibility requirementsHearings and public claimsBudgets
Public good: inherent characteristic
Public need: determined in a political process
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 15 / 19
Moral Hazard
Definition: lack of incentive to guard against risk where one isprotected from its consequences
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 16 / 19
Moral Hazard
Examples: Corporate and individual welfare
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 17 / 19
Moral Hazard
Stone takes bright view of individual behavior. What do youthink?
How do we examine the claims of moral hazard in public policy?
Does it affect individuals and groups (e.g., corporations)differently?
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 18 / 19
Welfare
Big Questions
How should we define welfare?
How do we distinguish need and desire?
How do we measure welfare?
How should government “promote the general welfare”
Mallinson Day 5 February 2, 2016 19 / 19