+ All Categories
Home > Education > Decisionmaking in groups

Decisionmaking in groups

Date post: 19-May-2015
Category:
Upload: profjim
View: 315 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
A look at our style of decision making and how we make group decisions.
54
Decision Making Our Style Our Groups Jim Marteney
Transcript
Page 1: Decisionmaking in groups

Decision Making

Our Style

Our Groups

Jim Marteney

Page 2: Decisionmaking in groups

Top 10 Ways to Make a Bad Decision

Make a decision based on money and time you've already spent.

Play up information that confirms your current point of view.

Ignore information that doesn't confirm your current point of view.

Pay too much attention to the first thing you hear, or the first data you receive.

Frame a decision only on the benefits OR risks, but not both.

Page 3: Decisionmaking in groups

Believe that your "gut" is the smartest person in the room. 

Wear rose-colored glasses when you are estimating the results.

Wear doom-colored glasses when you are estimating the results.

Don't use data at all.

Use nothing but data.

Top 10 Ways to Make a Bad Decision

Page 4: Decisionmaking in groups

Everyone Has Their Own Style

Communication

That leads to a style of

Decision Making

Page 5: Decisionmaking in groups

Workstyle Communication

Eagle

Roadrunner

Owl

Dove

Patient Fast

Task

People

Systematic

Better Safe Than Sorry

Notice my efficiency

Direct

Notice My Accomplishments

I want it done now

Considerate

Is Everyone Comfortable?

People and feelings important

Spirited

Don’t Confuse Me With Facts

Ain’t we got fun

Page 6: Decisionmaking in groups

Decision Making Style

Bull

Eagle

Bloodhound

Bee

Observing Knowing

Unemotional

Emotional

Analytical Direct

Amiable Expressive

We need more data to be sure.

Strike while the iron is hot.

This idea sounds like fun.

Will decision make us comfortable?

Page 7: Decisionmaking in groups

Develop Alternatives

Two important steps

Ideation

Judgment

Page 8: Decisionmaking in groups

Brainstorming

Goal is Quantity

No Criticism

Build on Ideas

Develop Alternatives

Page 9: Decisionmaking in groups

“If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.”

Abraham Maslow

Develop Alternatives

Page 10: Decisionmaking in groups

Traditional “hammer” what punishment would get them to not litter?

Problem: How Do You get people in a park to throw away their trash?

Reframe problem: How do you make throwing trash away fun?

Develop Alternatives

Page 11: Decisionmaking in groups

The World’s Deepest Trashcan

Develop Alternatives

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcrhp-IWK2w

Page 12: Decisionmaking in groups

Analyze Alternatives

Appraise Strengths

Appraise Weaknesses

Page 13: Decisionmaking in groups

Analyze Alternatives

Page 14: Decisionmaking in groups

Select Alternative

Continuum of Certainty

0% 100%

ReasonableDoubt

51%

Preponderanceof Evidence

Page 15: Decisionmaking in groups

Inference Test

The number one skill of the human mind

Recognizing Patterns

Page 16: Decisionmaking in groups

Every group has a unique personality

Syntality

Leading a Supportive Group

Page 17: Decisionmaking in groups

Leading a Supportive Group

Group strength from effective merging of participants individual energy

Synergy

Page 18: Decisionmaking in groups

Two Challenges Managing Group Tension

Groupthink

Abilene Paradox

Leading a Supportive Group

Page 19: Decisionmaking in groups

Irving Janis

Mismanagement of Disagreement

Groupthink

Page 20: Decisionmaking in groups

1972

Groupthink occurs when a homogenous highly cohesive group is so concerned with maintaining unanimity that they fail to evaluate all their alternatives and options.

Groupthink

Page 21: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Irving Janis

“The psychological drive for consensus

at any cost that suppresses dissent

and appraisal of alternatives in

cohesive decision-making groups”

Page 22: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Page 23: Decisionmaking in groups

Pearl Harbor

Challenger

Bay of Pigs

Groupthink

Page 24: Decisionmaking in groups

Bay of Pigs

RFK was quoted as approaching Schlesinger and saying: “You may be right or wrong, but the President has made up his mind. Don’t push it any further. Now is the time to help him all we can.”

Groupthink

Page 25: Decisionmaking in groups

Bay of Pigs

Schlesinger stopped his usual role as devil’s advocate and critic and began to sanction his own challenges.

Groupthink

Page 26: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Challenger Shuttle

Page 27: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Page 28: Decisionmaking in groups

Iraq Decision

“While the intention of this book is not to evaluate the Decision to Invade Iraq, the cumulative evidence to date strongly suggests that it is a classic case of groupthink.”

Author: Ph.D, Deborah L. MacKenzie

Groupthink

Page 29: Decisionmaking in groups

According to a scathing report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee, the United States went to war with Iraq on the basis of flawed intelligence assessments.

Groupthink

Page 30: Decisionmaking in groups

The CIA analysts suffered a case of Groupthink that rendered them incapable of consideringthat Iraq might have dismantled its weapons programs. Senate Intelligence Committee July 10

2004

Groupthink

Page 31: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

“I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder”

Edward J. Smith, Captain of the Titanic

Page 32: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

“I cannot imagine any condition which would cause a ship to founder”

Edward J. Smith, Captain of the Titanic

Page 33: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Members avoid being too harsh in their judgments of their leader’s or their colleagues’ ideas.

Page 34: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

They adopt a soft line of criticism, even in their own thinking.

Page 35: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

At their meetings, all the members are amiable and seek complete concurrence on every important issue, with no bickering or conflict to spoil the cozy, “we-feeling” atmosphere.

----Psychology Today

Page 36: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Symptoms

Pressure for Conformity

Self-Censorship

Illusion of Unanimity

Mindguards

Page 37: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

Negative Outcomes

Examining few alternatives

Not being critical of each other's ideas

Not examining early alternatives

Not seeking expert opinion Being highly selective in gathering

information Not having contingency plans

Page 38: Decisionmaking in groups

Refrain from stating preference

Assign a Devil’s Advocate

Seek expert input

Preventing

Call a “Second Chance Meeting”

Split into Sub-groups

Encourage member’s objections

Groupthink

Page 39: Decisionmaking in groups

Groupthink

The Key: Someone with the courage to disagree.

Page 40: Decisionmaking in groups

Abilene Paradox

Occurs when a group takes action contrary to the desires of the

members

The Mismanagement of Agreement

and thus, defeats the purpose of the group.

Page 41: Decisionmaking in groups

Abilene ParadoxThe Mismanagement of Agreement

Page 42: Decisionmaking in groups

Abilene Paradox

“Taking the trip to Abilene”

Jerry Harvey

Page 43: Decisionmaking in groups

Group Climate

Supportive

Defensive

Two Basic Group Climates

Page 44: Decisionmaking in groups

Build a Consensus

Page 45: Decisionmaking in groups

Build a Consensus

Page 46: Decisionmaking in groups

at least partially agree

are committed to the decision

Where all Group Members

Build a Consensus

Page 47: Decisionmaking in groups

Build a Consensus

Page 48: Decisionmaking in groups

Avoid Arguing for Just your Opinion

Avoid Win/Lose Situations

Seek Differences of Opinion

Use Group Pronouns

Orient Towards Group Goal

Build a Consensus

Page 49: Decisionmaking in groups

Implement Alternative

There will always be resistance

Page 50: Decisionmaking in groups

Change has considerable impact on the human mind.

To the fearful, it is threatening because it means things may get worse.

To the hopeful, it is encouraging because things may get better.

To the confident, it is inspiring because the challenge exists to make things better.

Implement Alternative

Page 51: Decisionmaking in groups

Obviously then, one's character and frame of mind determine how one relates to change.

Implement Alternative

Page 52: Decisionmaking in groups

“When you assemble a number of (people) to have advantage of their joint wisdom, you assemble with those (people), all their

Page 53: Decisionmaking in groups

Prejudices, their passions, their errors of opinion, their local interest, and their selfish views.

From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected?” Ben Franklin Constitutional Convention September 15, 1787

Page 54: Decisionmaking in groups

Recommended