Date post: | 18-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | winfred-nichols |
View: | 227 times |
Download: | 0 times |
1
Declining Inequality in Latin America: Labor Markets & Redistributive
Policies
Nora LustigTulane University
New Challenges for Growth and Productivity
The Growth Dialogue – G24
Washington, DC -- September 25, 2013
2
Inequality in Latin America is high… …but declining since around 2000Decline is pervasive and significant• Larger than the rise in inequality in 1990s• Important contribution to the decline in
poverty• In countries with high growth & low growth• In countries with left and nonleft
governments• In commodity exporters and importers
LATAM IS THE MOST UNEQUAL REGION IN THE WORLDGini Coefficient by Region (in %), 2004
(Ferreira and Ravallion, 2008)
32.233.6
38.9 38.9 39.1
44.7
53.2
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
High Income Europe andCentral Asia
South Asia North Africaand the
Middle East
East Asia andthe Pacific
Sub-SaharanAfrica
Latin Americaand the
Caribbean
Gin
i co
eff
icie
nt
3
4
Latin America: Declining income inequality by country: 2000-2011
(Annual Change of Gini in %)N
icar
agu
a
Bol
ivia
Ecu
ador
Arg
enti
na
El S
alva
dor
Mex
ico
Ven
ezu
ela
Bra
zil
Per
u
Dom
. Rep
.
Pan
ama
Chile
Cos
ta R
ica
Par
aguay
Uru
guay
Guat
emal
a
Hon
dura
s
LA
C-1
7
Chin
a
Sou
th A
fric
a
Ind
ia
US
A
-3.00
-2.00
-1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
-2.64
-2.05-1.99
-1.30-1.24-1.17-1.07-1.03-0.91-0.79-0.74-0.72-0.47-0.39
-0.20-0.10
0.61
-0.95
2.12
0.820.770.40
5
Decomposing the change in poverty in the 2000s: growth vs. redistribution
(Datt-Ravallion Decomp Method)
6
• Determinants:–Declining inequality of hourly labor
income–Larger and more progressive
transfers–Lower dependency ratios
7
Decomposing Decline in InequalityLabor (red); Transfers (Green); Demog (Blue)
(Azevedo et al. 2012)
8
Determinants of declining inequality in hourly labor earnings:
Decline in returns to post-secondary education (aka. skill premium)•Supply•Demand•Pro-active Labor Policies•Degraded tertiary
9
Argentina, Brazil and Mexico• Argentina:
– High growth due to post-2002 recovery– Devaluation in early 2000s => increase in relative demand of low-skilled workers – Very pro-active labor market policies
• Brazil: – Low growth during most of the period – Increase in relative supply of skilled workers– Increase in relative demand of low-skilled workers– Pro-active labor market policies
• Mexico: – low growth – Increase in relative supply of skilled workers– No pro-active labor market policies
10
How redistributive are Latin American governments?
• Decomposition of changes in inequality by income source show that transfers is, on average, the second most important proximate determinant of decline in overall inequality
• Benefit and tax incidence analysis for 11 countries
• www.commitmentoequity.org
11
Inequality Reduction: Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay (2009)
(Taxes and Social Spending)
Market Income
Net Market Income
Disposable Income
Post-Fiscal Income
Final Income0.36
0.41
0.46
0.51
0.56
0.61
0.580.56
0.54 0.55
0.44
0.510.49
0.48
0.43
0.500.50
0.49
0.47
0.490.48
0.46
0.46
0.39
Brazil (2009)Mexico (2010)Peru (2009)Uruguay (2009)
12
Inequality Reduction: Mexico 1996 vs. 2010 (Impact of Social Spending)
Net Market Income Disposable Income Final Income0.42
0.44
0.46
0.48
0.5
0.52
0.54
0.52
0.52
0.49
0.50
0.49
0.45
19962010G
ini
14
Poverty Reduction: Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay (Income Taxes, Cash Transfers and Consumption
Taxes; Poverty line US$2.50 ppp/day)
Net Market Income Disposable Income Post-Fiscal Income0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Brazil (2009)Mexico (2010)Peru (2009)Uruguay (2009)
15
Inequality Reduction by Direct Taxes and Transfers: Brazil, Europe and US
• Direct taxes and transfers reduce inequality by 7.0 percentage points in US & 3.9 percentage points in Brazil
Braz
ilGr
eece
Unite
d St
ates
Italy
Port
ugal
Spai
nN
ethe
rland
sFr
ance
Aust
riaGe
rman
ySw
eden
Luxe
mbo
urg
Belg
ium
UK Finl
and
Denm
ark
Irela
nd
-0.2
-0.15
-0.1
-0.05
0
Change between Market and Disposable Income Ginis
Source: authors’ calculations for Brazil and US; Immervoll et al. (2009) for Europe
16
How should we measure inequality to monitor how equitable societies are?
Two points:• Regardless of the measure of choice=> before/after
government taxes and transfers• Data: – Household surveys a good source mainly for labor
income and government transfers – But rich are not captured; use tax returns as
suggested by Top Incomes Project (Alvaredo, Atkinson, Piketty, Saez)
18
Commitment to Equity (CEQ), joint project of Tulane University and Inter-American Dialogue.
www.commitmentoequity.org
19
References• Alvaredo, Facundo and Juliana Londoño (2013) “High Incomes and Personal Taxation in a
Developing Economy: Colombia 1993-2010,” CEQ Working Paper No. 12, March. • Azevedo, J. P., G. Inchauste, and V. Sanfelice (2012) “Decomposing the Recent Inequality
Decline in Latin America”, Mimeo, The World Bank.• Campos, Raymundo, Gerardo Esquivel and Nora Lustig (2013) ´The Rise and Fall of
Income Inequality in Mexico, 1989–2010,” in Giovanni Andrea Cornia (editor), title not yet specified, Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
• Gasparini, L., S. Galiani, G. Cruces, and P. Acosta (2011) “Educational Upgrading and Returns to Skills in Latin America. Evidence from a Supply-Demand Framework,
• Higgins, S., N. Lustig, W. Ruble and T. Smeeding. “Comparing Taxation, Transfers, and Redistribution in Brazil and the United States,” paper presented at the IARIW Conference, Rio, Brazil, September 13, 2013.
• Lustig, N., L.F. Lopez-Calva and E. Ortiz (2013) “Declining Inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The Cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico,” World Development, Vol. 44, 129-141.
• Lustig, Nora and Carola Pessino (2014) “Social Spending and Income Redistribution in Argentina in the 2000s: the Rising Role of Noncontributory Pensions,” Public Finance Review.
• Lustig, Nora et. al. (2013)“The Impact of Taxes and Social Spending on Inequality and Poverty in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay: an Overview,” CEQ Working Paper No. 13.
20
References for Incidence Analysis
Argentina: Lustig, Nora, Luis F. Lopez-Calva and Eduardo Ortiz-Juarez (2013) ´Deconstructing the Decline in Inequality in Latin America,´ chapter for Essays in Honor of Enrique IglesiasBrazil: Higgins, Sean and Claudiney Pereira. 2014. The Effects of Brazil’s High Taxation and Social Spending on the Distribution of Household Income. Forthcoming in Lustig, Nora, Carola Pessino, and John Scott, Eds. “Fiscal Policy, Poverty and Redistribution in Latin America,” Public Finance Review. Mexico: Scott, John. 2014. Redistributive Impact and Efficiency of Mexico’s Fiscal System. Forthcoming in Lustig, Nora, Carola Pessino, and John Scott, Eds. “Fiscal Policy, Poverty and Redistribution in Latin America,” Public Finance Review. Peru: Jaramillo, Miguel. 2014. The Incidence of Social Spending and Taxes in Peru. Forthcoming in Lustig, Nora, Carola Pessino, and John Scott, Eds. “Fiscal Policy, Poverty and Redistribution in Latin America,” Public Finance Review. Uruguay: Bucheli, Marisa, Nora Lustig, Máximo Rossi, and Florencia Amábile. 2014. Social Spending, Taxes, and Income Redistribution in Uruguay. Forthcoming in Lustig, Nora, Carola Pessino, and John Scott, Eds. “Fiscal Policy, Poverty and Redistribution in Latin America,” Public Finance Review. Slide 5:Lopez-Calva, L., N. Lustig, J. Scott and A. Castaneda. Gasto social, redistribución del ingreso y reducción de la pobreza en México: 1996 y 2010. Book chapter (in-progress)For more on Commitment to Equity (CEQ) visit www.commitmentoequity.org