Deliverable 2 - PentaHelix · This project is funded by the European Commission under Horizon 2020...

This project is funded by the European Commission

under Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement No. 784994

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Deliverable 2.1 Baseline report

Deliverable Number D2.1

Deliverable Name Baseline report

Deliverable Version V1.0

Work Package (WP) WP2 Status assessment, baseline and stakeholder mapping

Due date 31th December 2018

Date of Submission 31th December 2018

Main Author UNIZAG FSB

Contributors All Partners

Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this report lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect

the opinion of the funding authorities. The funding authorities are not responsible for any use that may come from

the information contained therein.

This report has been submitted to the EC for approval and as such it is still to be considered

as draft

2

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table of content

List of tables ....................................................................................................................................................... 1

Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4

Project background ........................................................................................................................................ 4

Scope of the report ........................................................................................................................................ 5

Baseline assessment ........................................................................................................................................... 7

Belgium........................................................................................................................................................... 8

Croatia .......................................................................................................................................................... 29

Norway ......................................................................................................................................................... 45

Latvia ............................................................................................................................................................ 63

Spain ............................................................................................................................................................. 83

Detailed and thorough analysis of the pilot municipalities ........................................................................... 102

Moorslede .................................................................................................................................................. 103

Joint SEAP for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek ........................................................................................................................................... 118

Velika Gorica .............................................................................................................................................. 130

Våler ........................................................................................................................................................... 142

Sarpsborg ................................................................................................................................................... 153

Salamanca .................................................................................................................................................. 164

Palencia ...................................................................................................................................................... 167

The 7 municipalitas of Ávila ....................................................................................................................... 176

Jekabpils ..................................................................................................................................................... 179

Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................................... 196

Sources ........................................................................................................................................................... 197

1

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

List of tables Table 1 Selected SEAPs- Belgium ....................................................................................................................... 9 Table 2 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors ................................................................ 10 Table 3 Analysis of the general level of detail .................................................................................................. 11 Table 4 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction ............................ 14 Table 5 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................... 25 Table 6 Evaluation of the implemented measures .......................................................................................... 27 Table 7 Selected SEAPs-Croatia ........................................................................................................................ 29 Table 8 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors ................................................................ 30 Table 9 Analysis of the general level of detail .................................................................................................. 30 Table 10 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 33 Table 11 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 41 Table 12 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 42 Table 13 Selected SE(C)APs-Norway ................................................................................................................ 46 Table 14 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 47 Table 15 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 47 Table 16 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 50 Table 17 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 59 Table 18 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 61 Table 19 Selected SE(C)APs-Latvia ................................................................................................................... 64 Table 20 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 65 Table 21 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 65 Table 22 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 68 Table 23 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 77 Table 24 Evaluation of the implemented measures ........................................................................................ 81 Table 25 Selected SEAPs- Spain ....................................................................................................................... 84 Table 26 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors .............................................................. 85 Table 27 Analysis of the general level of detail ................................................................................................ 85 Table 28 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction .......................... 88 Table 29 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators ............................................. 98 Table 30 Evaluation of the implemented measures ...................................................................................... 100 Table 31 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 103 Table 32 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 104 Table 33 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 106 Table 34 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 107 Table 35 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 109 Table 36 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 110 Table 37 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 111 Table 38 SEAP implementation-indicators .................................................................................................... 113 Table 39 SEAP monitoring overview .............................................................................................................. 115 Table 40 Municipalities that carry out the joint SEAP ................................................................................... 118 Table 41 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 118 Table 42 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 119 Table 43 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 121

2

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 44 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 122 Table 45 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 123 Table 46 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 124 Table 47 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 124 Table 48 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 126 Table 49 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 127 Table 50 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 130 Table 51 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 131 Table 52 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 133 Table 53 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 134 Table 54 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 134 Table 55 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 136 Table 56 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 137 Table 57 SEAP implementation- indicators .................................................................................................... 139 Table 58 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 142 Table 59 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 143 Table 60 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 144 Table 61 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 145 Table 62 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 146 Table 63 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 147 Table 64 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 147 Table 65 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 149 Table 66 SECAP monitoring overview ............................................................................................................ 150 Table 67 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 153 Table 68 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 154 Table 69 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 155 Table 70 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 156 Table 71 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 157 Table 72 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 158 Table 73 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 159 Table 74 SECAP implementation- indicators ................................................................................................. 160 Table 75 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 162 Table 76 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 164 Table 77 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 165 Table 78 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 167 Table 79 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 168 Table 80 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 169 Table 81 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 170 Table 82 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 171 Table 83 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 172 Table 84 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 172 Table 85 SEAP implementation- indicators .................................................................................................... 174 Table 86 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 176 Table 87 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 177

3

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 88 Initiation phase ................................................................................................................................ 179 Table 89 Planning phase ................................................................................................................................ 180 Table 90 Implementation phase .................................................................................................................... 182 Table 91 Monitoring and reporting phase ..................................................................................................... 183 Table 92 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data ........................................ 184 Table 93 Stakeholders’ involvement .............................................................................................................. 186 Table 94 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction ..................................................................................... 186 Table 95 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators ............................................................................................... 188 Table 96 SE(C)AP monitoring overview ......................................................................................................... 189

4

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Introduction

The purpose of this report is to detail the overall status of the SE(C)AP implementation and development in

the partners country, with a special focus on the pilot municipalities. This step is key for all future actions

due to the large difference of the practice of the SE(C)AP development process and the level of the

implementation of the measures. The presented results will enable the evaluation of the feasibility and ease

of implementation of the devised PentaHelix method in different legal, economic and cultural framework.

Furthermore, they will also be used as a starting point for the implementation and replication steps.

Project background

The PentaHelix project is focusing on developing and testing a new approach for integrating multi-

governance planning for sustainable energy, both horizontal and vertical, together with close interaction

with key stakeholders in energy efficiency and sustainable energy solutions. Here, integrated development

focuses on five different stakeholder groups, who constitute the PentaHelix pillars:

• Public authorities (local, regional, national and international);

• Industry (and businesses such as SMEs, farmers, trade etc);

• Academia (research and educational institutes);

• NGOs (associations, interest organisations, etc);

• Citizens (house owners, car owners, commuters etc).

Representatives of the PentaHelix pillars constitute the task force groups, that serve as a driver for a wider

scope of the of Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs), as well as bringing in valuable insights

and identification of potential measures, system solutions and a better understanding of drivers and barriers

for a more sustainable society as a whole, in each specific region. The approach will be developed and tested

in Norway, Croatia, Latvia, Belgium and Spain, what will enable its validation across a wide set of different

economic, climate, social and political conditions. In each of those countries, municipalities which will act as

the pilot municipalities, are chosen.

Furthermore, the project aims at developing the peer-to-peer online platform for SECAP development that

can be used for multiple public authorities in joint planning and implementation. This will enable the

integration of different administrative levels and geographical planning areas as well as enhance the cost

efficiency in the entire planning and implementation process based on economy of scale and closer

cooperation and exchange.

To further enhance the impact of the project a broad replication and dissemination strategy and actions will

be rolled out in many countries in the EU. To ensure that the PentaHelix project will reach out to all parts of

the civil society, the consortium includes two network partners- Climate Action Network Europe (CAN

Europe) and the EBN innovation network.

5

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Scope of the report

First part of the report provides an overview of the general state of the art of the existing SE(C)APs

development in Belgium, Croatia, Norway, Latvia and Spain. For this purpose, five SE(C)APs have been

selected from each partner country. Those SE(C)APs represent municipalities of different population groups

and from different regions, in order to give a better overview of local conditions. Evaluation and analysis of

the selected SE(C)APs provide an insight into the general level of detail, the most common measures

proposed, indicators used for the monitoring, identified potentials and actually implemented measures.

Furthermore, brief description of each project country is provided within the first part of the report, detailing

the general information for the country such as: area, population, climate, economy, main branches of

industry, specifics of the country, number of CoM signatures , the most significant renewable energy sources,

the share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy.

The second part of the report presents the results of the detailed and thorough analysis conducted for the

pilot municipalities. As the pilot municipalities differ with previous experience of SE(C)AP development, the

analysis has been adjusted regarding the phase of SE(C)AP development. Here, the process of SE(C)AP

development has been divided into four phases: initiation, planning, implementation and monitoring phase.

Corresponding actions of each phase, which have been used as indicators to determine the current phase of

SE(C)AP development are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Phases of SE(C)AP development

For the cases where the SE(C)AP is being revised, the information about the previous experiences with the

SE(C)AP development are presented for all four phases. In the cases where the new SECAP is being

developed, presented is the information about the current phase of the SECAP development.

6

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

The results of the analysis present a wide range of information such as: involvement of municipal council and

stakeholders during each phase of SE(C)AP development, general level of detail of the existing SEAP (with

the special attention to baseline emissions inventory), proposed measures for CO2 reduction and its

potential, used implementation indicators etc. In the case when pilot municipalities which have submitted

their progress report to CoM are being analysed, partners gave an overview of the level of implementation

of the mitigation actions. The detailed thorough analysis analysis has been conducted for municipalities for

which nine SECAPs will be developed.

7

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Baseline assessment

8

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Belgium

Belgium has a total surface of 30.528 km² and has 11.358.357 inhabitants (1st Jan. 2018) [1].

The climate is a temperate sea climate (can be stated for the entire country), which means summers are

relatively chilly and winters are rather warm.

The economy of Belgium is orientated towards services, transport and trade; industrial sectors are in decline.

In West-Flanders the agricultural sector is very important, where the pig production, land cultivation and

horticulture are the main sectors. The REO auction in Roeselare (selling point for fruit, vegetables and herbs

in large volumes and worldwide) is a key actor. In the region Midwest, there are also several big companies

involved in the production of frozen products (strong link with the agricultural sector).

West-Flanders is a coastal province, the main harbours are Zeebrugge and Oostende.

In Flanders, many municipalities signed the Covenant of Mayors. In West-Flanders in every region a group of

municipalities was formed under the option 2-formula. This means there is the mutual goal of reaching 20%

reduction in exhaust of CO2 within the group, one baseline emission inventory and one SEAP were drafted.

In total 5 SEAP’s were drafted in this way: 4 by WVI and 1 by Leiedal. The bigger cities in West-Flanders are

individual participants in the CoM 2020 project.

The number of CoM 2020 signatories in Belgium according to the CoM website [2]: 221 (out of 589

municipalities in Belgium). This is not a representative number for the number of municipalities joining the

framework though. For example: in West-Flanders 41 municipalities are working together under option 2,

within 5 groups. This means they are counted as 5 signatories on the European website, instead of 41. This

also means that the number of municipalities according to population is not entirely correct (within a group,

the total population is taken into account). According to the CoM website [2], the following division can be

made:

o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 59

o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants): 139

o Number of municipalities M (50,000-250,00 inhabitants): 20

o Number of municipalities L (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 1

o Number of municipalities XL (> 500,000 inhabitants): 2

Here, the number of M municipalities is overrated and the number of XS and S municipalities is highly

underrated due to the corporations under option 2. Also, most of the Belgian participators are located in

Flanders.

The significant renewable energy sources in gross inland energy consumption: biofuels and renewable wastes

(5.4%), wind power (0.8%), solar power (0.5%) and hydro power (0.1% ) [3].

The share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy was 8.7% in in 2016 [4]

(target is 13%).

The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are presented

in Table 1.

9

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 1 Selected SEAPs- Belgium

Selected SEAP or SECAP

Country Population Area [km²] The number of municipalities

involved

1.SEAP Oostende Belgium 68 931 37.72 1

2.SEAP Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen

Belgium 302 137 446.48 13

3.SEAP Van Zee tot IJzer Belgium 101 843 585.95 9

4.SEAP Mechelen Belgium 86 304 65.19 1

5.SEAP Leuven Belgium 101 396 56.63 1

The information provided in Table 2 refer to the general goals for the CO2 reduction, set by the municipality,

and to emission factors used for the SE(C)AP development.

10

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 2 Evaluation of the general goals and used emission factors

General goals and used emission factors

Oostende

Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen

Van Zee tot IJzer Mechelen Leuven

The target overall CO2 emission reduction. [%]

51% over the period 1990-2020, with 62% direct reduction and

14% indirect reduction

20% over the period 2005-2020

20% over the period 2011-2020

20% 22%

Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction? [absolute reduction/ per capita reduction]

Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction

Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC for energy -------

Additional remarks

Oostende



The BEI is calculated for 2007, and then calculated back to 1990 (estimation).

Reduction goals are determined for the period 1990-2020.

Only for the sectors

The BEI is calculated for 2011 in detail, referrals are made

towards 2005

The reference year in the BEI (2011) is used

in the plan, no referrals to the past are made (as is the case in the other 2

SEAPs)

11

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

agriculture and waste

water+waste treatment CO2-

equivalents are taken into account (for the

other sectors only CO2 is taken into account).

The information provided in Table 3 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).

Table 3 Analysis of the general level of detail

Long-term vision

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? NO (until 2020)

Focus on 2020, chapter with the long-

term strategy to become climate neutral in 2050

NO (until 2020) YES YES

CO2 emissions

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?

YES YES YES YES YES

12

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sector?

YES YES YES YES YES

Energy consumption

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?

YES YES NO (the BEI does) YES YES

Does the SE(C)AP contain the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector?

NO YES NO (the BEI does) YES YES

Does the SE(C)AP contain the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?

NO NO NO YES NO

Buildings

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?

NO NO NO YES NO

13

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations? NO NO NO NO NO

Industry

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? YES YES NO YES NO

Transport and mobility

Oostende



Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)?

NO NO NO NO NO

Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the public transportation?

NO NO NO NO NO

Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the modes of transport?

NO NO NO NO NO

Stakeholders’ involvement

Oostende



Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP?

NO NO YES YES YES

14

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO NO NO NO

Additional remarks

Oostende



The BEI is not repeated in the SEAP

The BEI is repeated in the SEAP

The BEI is not repeated in the SEAP

Table 4 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SEAPs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.

Table 4 Evaluation of the most common proposed measures for CO2 emission reduction

Buildings equipment/facilities

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in municipal buildings equipment/facilities.

1. Energy efficient/

energy neutral

municipal

buildings

2. Purchase of

renewable energy

3. Installation of PV

panels on

municipal

buildings

1. Purchase of 100%

renewable

electricity

2. Renewable energy

on public buildings

3. Master planning

for energy

refurbishment of

public buildings

and optimizing

energy use

1. Renovation (partial

or total) of

municipal buildings

2. Investments in

renewable energy

on/in municipal

buildings

3. Purchase of 100%

renewable energy

1. ESCO with Eandis

(energy Company)

2. Energy audit by

Eandis

3. Energy accounting

---------

15

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]

0.0891 0.0827 0.0145 --------- ---------

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities.

1. Purchase of

renewable energy

2. Group purchase

of roof insulation

3. Covenants about

energetic

renovation with

motivated

inhabitants

1. Local and regional

impacts of policies

of federal and

Flemish

governments (e.g.

Flemish law stating

that houses from

2020 on no longer

can be rented

when they have no

roof insulation

leads to actions

from house owners

in the

municipalities

towards placing

roof insulation)

2. Energy renovation

of social housing

stock

3. Deburdening of

house owners in

renovation

process,

1. Stimulating the

placement of

photovoltaic panels

on dwellings

2. Actions towards

stimulating

energetic

renovation of

dwellings

3. Cheap loan for

taking energy

measures in

dwellings (Flemish

energy loans)

1. Renovation waves

2. Full/complete roof

insulation

3. Replace single

glass by high

energy efficient

glazing

1. Renovation waves

2. Roof insulation in

existing houses

3. Replace single by

double glazing

16

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

refurbishment

assistance and

demonstrations of

renovations

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2

reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]

0.8357 0.4631 0.5554 0.59 0.13

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities.

1. Purchase of

renewable energy

2. Closing of open

shop doors

1. Local and regional

impacts of policies

of federal and

Flemish

governments

2. Estimated

reduction not

associated with

any reported

actions

1. Actions towards LED

illumination and

quick wins (actions

that can rather

easily be

implemented by

companies, with

impact e.g. turning

of the light in

windows of shops

during the night, or

on car parks...

2. Awareness raising

towards the tertiary

sectors (to make

instruments and

support tools

regarding energy

efficiency and

1. Replace air curtain

with sliding doors

in ¼ of the

commercial

buildings

2. Ventilation system

D in ¼ of the

commercial

buildings

3. Reduce energy use

of lighting from 52

W/m² to 20 W/m²

by ½ of the

commercial

buildings

1. Replace air curtain

with sliding doors

in ¼ of the

commercial

buildings

2. Ventilation system

D in ¼ of the

commercial

buildings

17

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

renewable energy

known)

3. Actions towards

shops concerning

energy efficiency


reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities. [t CO2/ capita]

0.4947 0.1423 0.0563 0.51 0.48

Transport

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in transport.

1. Shore based

power (with green

electricity)

2. Reduction in

emissions by ships

through a

sustainable policy

(10%)

3. Investing in buses

on green gas as

replacement for

old buses

1. Improving

infrastructure for

cycling and walking

(slow traffic)

2. Estimated

reduction not

associated with

any reported

actions

3. Electric cars –

setting the

example for

citizens (electric

cars for public

authorities)

1. Modal shift towards

going by bike or foot

2. Supporting

technological

progress (e.g.

electric vehicles)

3. Vehicle-restricted

city centers and

residential quarters

1. Combination of

cycle and public

transport city by

2030

2. Low emission zone

in city centre

Mechelen

3. Invite companies

(on voluntary

basis) to sign a

charter to reduce

the emissions of

their vehicle fleet

1. Database for

exchange of

transportation

services, such as

cars, renting a bike,

etc

2. Reduce extra travel

by local services to

compensate for

lack of local

services

3. Multifaceted,

33/33/33 (cycle,

public transport,

car) transport city.

18

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]

0.5182 0.1094 0.1874 0.23 0.42

Public lighting

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in public lighting.

1. Research, LED,

turning off and

dimming public

lighting, using

best available

techniques,

according to a

lighting plan

1. Dimming and

turning off

streetlights during

parts of the night

2. Urban or regional

lighting vision

3. Action plan to

reduce energy

consumption of

street lighting

1. Dimming and

turning off public

lighting during the

evening and/or

night + energy

efficient public

lighting according to

urban/regional

vision

2. Capacity-building

and awareness

raising

1. Execute public

lighting plan by

2020

2. Invest in energy

efficient PL

--------

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in public lighting. [t CO2/ capita]

0.0059 0.0033 0.0029 0.02

Local electricity production

Oostende



19

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local electricity production.

1. Wind turbines

(medium sized)

2. Solar panels for

industry, tertiary

sector and

residential sector

1. Stimulating

decentral local

renewable energy

production up to

5.5% of local

energy use by 2020

1. Stimulating

decentral (local)

renewable energy

production with the

aim to reduce CO2-

emissions up to 2%

by 2020

2. Supporting or

setting up

cooperative

structures for

renewable energy

1. PV-cells 162 MWE

by 2030

2. 10 wind turbines-

3MWe

3. 1 biomass boiler

of 1 MWth for 220

houses (collective

heat network

1. Residential PV-cells

(1/5 of roof

surface)

2. Non-residential PV-

cells (1/10 of roof

surface)

3. Windmills 2 MW

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local electricity production. [t CO2/ capita]

0.1240 0.3358 0.0704 0.28 Included in other

sectors

Local heat/cold production

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in local heat/cold production.

1. District heating

network for the

city (no further

detail known than

that there is

enough potential

to do further

research)

1. New district

heating schemes

(interested

municipalities are

mentioned, as is a

possible heat

source namely the

1. Integrating heat

nets in the city

(interested

municipalities are

mentioned)

1. Heat pumps on

green power

(households)

2. Heat pumps for

heating and

cooling in 1/8 of al

buildings (Tertiary

sector)

1. Sun boiler on

1/10th of the non-

residential

buildings

2. 10 heat plants

3. Cogeneration

20

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

waste incinerator

in Harelbeke)

3. Residual/waste

heat from

industry,

riothermia

(renewable

energy)

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]

2.0310 0.0030 0.0037 0.29 Included in other

sectors

Industry

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry.

1. Bio CHP in

companies

(general outline

i.e. 50% of the

energy demand of

industry could be

delivered,

therefore 10

1MWe-

installations are

necessary)

2. Purchase of

renewable energy

1. Carbon neutral

business parks

2. Revitalising

industrial parks –

researching for

options for heat

recovery and

district heating

------------ ------------ ------------

21

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

3. “Business park

neutrality” i.e. as

well as for

electricity as for

fossil fuels

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]

1.1445 0.0248 ------------ ------------ ------------

Others (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries)

Oostende



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture.

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

1. Checking of

improper use of/

and correct

appointing of fuel

for agriculture

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in agriculture. [t CO2/ capita]

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ 0.10

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry.

------------

1. Reinforcing the

blue-green

network in

urbanised areas

------------ ------------

1. Planting of 10.000

trees

2. Purchase of

247 105 (100

22

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

hectare) acre of

forest

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in forestry. [t CO2/ capita]

------------ 0.0059 ------------ ------------

Included by agriculture

Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries.

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in fisheries. [t CO2/ capita]

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Funding

Oostende



Are possible sources of funding mentioned in the SE(C)AP?

NO NO NO NO NO

Three measures which require the lowest total investment costs per tonne of CO2.

1. Replacing cars by

electric cars by

the city (electric

cars are cheaper

taking into

account the set of

fiscal and subsidy

instruments of

Flanders)

------------ ------------

1. Green power,

trade and services

2. Green power

industry

3. Employees will

receive mobility

budget rather

than company car

------------

23

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

2. Purchase of 100%

renewable energy

(no cost

calculated since

this type of

electricity is not

more expensive

than the “grey

power”)

3. Investing in buses

on green gas as

replacement for

old buses (extra

cost compared to

a normal bus is

relatively small)


Oostende



Three measures that are expected to require the greatest involvement of stakeholders.

1. District heating

2. Wind turbines

3. Renovations in

the residential

sector

1. District heating

2. Wind turbines

3. Urban or regional

lighting vision

1. District heating

2. Wind turbines

3. Vehicle-restricted

city centres and

residential quarters

1. Energy

management at

industries

2. Renovation of

existing houses

3. Group cargo

transport, to

transport together

1. Renovation of

existing houses

2. multimodal

mobility city

3. Replace lighting at

trade and service

companies

24

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Additional remarks

Oostende



Some elements not included in the CoM

framework are included in the BEI and SEAP e.g. rail traffic, shipping

transport.

Calculating the investment cost per ton CO2-reduction is

not giving a good insight, since it does not incorporate the reduction in cost for

energy use. For some measures the cost

couldn’t be determined.

The SEAP mentions that a financial plan will

still be developed

Table 5 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs.

25

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 5 Evaluation of the most common SE(C)AP implementation indicators

Municipal, residential, tertiary buildings equipment/facilities

Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the building sector

1. Total energy use in

municipal

buildings

2. Total number of

energy scans

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Public lighting

Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the public lighting.

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Transport

Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport.

1. Investments in

construction or

repairs of cycling

paths

2. Number of buses

on renewable

energy

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

26

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in local electricity production.

1. Amount of

renewable energy

set against the total

potential

2. Number of

photovoltaic

installations in

residential sector

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------


Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production.

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Industry (if included in the SE(C)AP)

Oostende



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry.

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Additional remarks

Oostende



27

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Selection out of the

list of indicators in the monitoring tool

No specific indicators are mentioned. The main indicator is the reduction in energy use in tonnes CO2 in

the MEI. In calculations, Flemish

standards and assessments are used. These items can’t be retrieved in the SEAP

itself.

No specific indicators are mentioned. The main indicator is the reduction in energy use in tonnes CO2 in

the MEI. In calculations, Flemish

standards and assessments are used. These items can’t be retrieved in the SEAP

itself.

Table 6 presents the progress of the SEAP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.

Table 6 Evaluation of the implemented measures

Implementation status

Oostende



The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP?

------------ ------------” ------------

Greenhouse gas emission reduction

Oostende



Greenhouse gas emission reduction of the completed actions.

[% COMPLETED ACTIONS]

------------ ------------ ------------ 6% ------------

28

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

The potential of the greenhouse gas emission reduction of the ongoing actions.

[% ONGOING ACTIONS]

------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.

------------ ------------ ------------ Residential buildings ------------

Final energy consumption

Oostende



Energy carrier with the highest change in final energy consumption (in percentage) from the year of BEI to the year of the most recent data available.

------------ ------------ ------------ Fossil fuels

Additional remarks

Oostende



According to the database, the

monitoring overview was submitted in

2015. For each of the subitems there is only

the following mentioned: “no data

available”

The action plan was submitted in 2014.

Under the part “progress” the group

Region Zuid-West-Vlaanderen can’t be found, although the monitoring should

have been executed.

The first monitoring has to be executed by

February 2019.

29

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Croatia

Republic of Croatia is located at the crossroads of Central and Southeast Europe, on the Adriatic Sea. Croatia

has 4.153 million inhabitants [5] and the surface area of total 87 667 square kilometres, which is made up of

56,538 square kilometres of mainland (65%) and 31 139 square kilometres (35%) of coastline (both inland

and territorial waters) [6].

The Croatian coast is located between the Dinaric Alps to the east and the Adriatic Sea to the west and has 1

800 km of coastline. Croatia has more than a thousand islands, islets and crags of which 48 of are inhabited.

The Croatian climate is mainly continental but at higher altitudes there is also a mountainous climate. In the

coastal regions the climate is classified as Mediterranean [6]. Mean annual precipitation ranges between 600

millimetres and 3,500 millimetres (depending on geographic region and prevailing climate type) [7].

Croatia's economy is dominated by service and industrial sectors and agriculture. Tourism is a significant

source of revenue, while the European Union is Croatia's most important trading partner.

Croatia has 62 Covenant of Mayors signatories. Based on the number of inhabitants, the following division

can be made:


o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants): 25



o Number of municipalities XL (>500,000 inhabitants): 1

In Croatia, biomass is the most significant energy source in gross inland energy consumption (15.1%) and it

is followed by hydro power (6.9%), wind power (1%) and solar energy (0.2%) [3]. Biomass is mostly used in

traditional wood fired stoves. The share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption is

28.3%. The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are

presented in Table 7.

Table 7 Selected SEAPs-Croatia


Country Population Area [km2] The number of municipalities

involved

1. SEAP Grad Zagreb Croatia 802 338 641 1

2. SEAP Pregrada Croatia 7 165 67.26 1

3. SEAP Pula Croatia 57 460 51.65 1

4. SEAP Belišće Croatia 10 825 69 1

5.SEAP Zadar Croatia 71 471 194 1


and to emission factors used for the SEAP development.

30

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Zagreb Pregrada Pula Belišće Zadar


21 % 21 % 21 % 21% 21%


Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction

Emission factor which have been used IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC IPCC



Long-term vision


Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? NO NO NO NO NO

CO2 emissions

31

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES

Energy consumption



YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES NO YES YES

Buildings


Does the SE(C)AP contain the description of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and

NO NO NO NO NO

32

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.)?

Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations? NO NO NO NO NO

Industry


Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? NO NO NO NO NO




NO NO NO NO NO


YES YES NO YES YES


YES NO NO NO YES




YES NO NO YES NO

33

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu






1. Education measures

and change in the

behaviour of the

employees/users of

the public buildings

2. Installation of solar

thermal collectors

for health and social

institutions owned

by the city

3. Thermal insulation

of the building

envelopes and roofs

1. Installation of

the solar thermal

collectors for

public buildings

2. Installation of

thermostatic

sets in all

municipal

buildings

3. Thermal

insulation of the

building

envelopes and

roofs

1. Thermal

insulation of the

building

envelopes and

roofs

2. Installation of

solar thermal

collectors on the

public buildings

3. Modernization

of the heating

systems in the

municipal

buildings

1. Thermal insulation

of the building

envelopes and

roofs

2. Installation of the

energy efficient

windows


small PV systems

on public buildings

1. Installation of PV

panels up to 30 kW

on public buildings

2. Thermal insulation of

the building

envelopes and roofs


programmable

thermostatic valves


1. 0.022584

2. 0.000003

3. 0.030344

1. 0.002494

2. 0.003367

3. 0.004581

1. 0.036233

2. 0.009049

3. 0.011434

1. 0.003032

2. 0.003515

3. 0.002387

1. 0.001087

2. 0.003539

3. 0.003417

Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP?

YES YES YES YES YES

34

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


1. Subsidies for

thermal insulation

of building

envelopes and roofs

of the residential

buildings

2. Subsidies for the

installation of

thermal solar

collectors on

residential buildings


purchase of the

energy-efficient

electrical appliances

for the residential

buildings

1. Subsidies for

thermal

insulation of

building

envelopes and

roofs for the

residential

buildings


installation of

thermal solar

collectors on

residential

buildings

3. Replacement of

the inefficient

light bulbs with

the energy

saving light bulbs

in all households

1. Energy efficiency

education for

the citizens


installation of PV

panels up to 30

kW on

residential

buildings


purchase of

biomass fired

boilers

1. Subsidies for

thermal insulation

of building

envelopes and

roofs of residential

buildings

2. Installation of

thermostatic sets

on radiators in

residential

buildings

3. Adoption of the

City Council

decision on

reduction of

municipal

contribution for

new low-energy

and passive

residential

buildings

1. Promotion of energy

efficiency

2. Subsidies for thermal

insulation of building

envelopes and roofs

of the residential

buildings


installation of PV

panels up to 10 kW

on residential

buildings

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]

1. 0.123277

2. 0.003357

3. 0.019867

1. 0.062052

2. 0.012535

3. 0.061934

1. 0.106056

2. 0.098938

3. 0.118674

1. 0.045092

2. 0.021111

3. 0.101918

1. 0.069343

2. 0.055792

3. 0.005073


1. Subsidies for

thermal insulation

of building

envelopes and roofs


installation of

the thermal solar


thermal

insulation of

building


installation of the

thermal solar


installation of PV

panels up to 30 kW

35

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

of the tertiary

buildings


use of renewable

energy sources in

the existing tertiary

buildings


purchase of the

energy-efficient

electrical appliances

collectors on the

tertiary buildings

2. Replacement of

the inefficient

lighting fixtures

with the energy-

efficient lighting

fixtures

3. Adoption of the

City Council

Decision on

reduction of cost

of municipal

contribution for

new tertiary

buildings which

use renewable

energy sources

envelopes of the

tertiary buildings


installation of PV

panels on the

tertiary buildings


energy efficient

lighting

collectors at the

tertiary buildings

2. Adoption of City

Council decision

on reduction of

municipal

contribution for

new tertiary

buildings which

are using

renewable energy

sources

3. Replacement of

the inefficient

lighting fixtures

with the energy

saving lighting

fixtures

on residential

buildings


installation of the

thermal solar

collectors on the

tertiary buildings

3. Subsidies for

windows

replacement,

thermal insulation of

building envelopes

and roofs of the

tertiary buildings

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities [t CO2/ capita]

1. 0.037889

2. 0.018945

3. 0.012139

1. 0.030324

2. 0.030204

3. 0.052004

1. 0.061991

2. 0.148399

3. 0.021598

1. 0.040002

2. 0.040002

3. 0.014650

1. 0.015219

2. 0.000566

3. 0.061698

Transport


36

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


1. Introduction of fees

for traffic pollution

in the city centre

2. Informing and

training for

environmentally

sound driving

3. Establishment of

the bicycle rental

network equipped

with IT theft

protection

1. Adoption of the

decision of the

City Council

granting

concessions for

bus

transportation

by gradual

replacement of

old buses by

biodiesel-fuelled

buses

2. A group of

measures to

improve bicycle

transport

3. Introduction of

an automated

city parking

billing system

1. Increasing the

share of

biodiesel in

transport

2. Measures for

encouraging use

of the public

transport

3. Informing and

training for

environmentally

sound driving

1. Increasing the

share of biodiesel

in transport

2. Introducing

automatic parking

charge system in

the city

1. Education and

promotion of the

energy efficiency in

traffic

2. Introducing a car-

sharing model

3. Introducing the

system of monitoring

driving style bus

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]

1. 0.011292

2. 0.012526

3. 0.016186

1. 0.028751

2. 0.0174566

3. 0.0262317

1. 0.208284

2. 0.043926

3. 0.098434

1. 0.046200

2. 0.011919

1. 0.072039

2. 0.027259

3. 0.002449

Public lighting


37

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


1. Replacing outdated

lighting fixtures

with energy-

efficient and more

environmentally-

friendly lighting

fixtures

2. Management and

regulation of the

public lighting

system

1. Reconstruction

of the public

lighting

1. Modernization

of the public

lighting

1. Replacing

outdated lighting

fixtures with

energy-efficient

and more

environmentally-

friendly lighting

fixtures

2. Management and

regulation of the

public lighting

system

1. Replacing outdated

lighting fixtures with

energy-efficient and

more

environmentally-

friendly lighting

fixtures

2. Regulation of the

public lighting

system


1. 0.0025388

2. 0.0072538 1. 0.004878 1. 0.015523

1. 0.004237

2. 0.001703

1. 0.016086

2. 0.010952




------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------


38

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Industry


Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in industry. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

39

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. ------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Funding



YES YES YES YES YES



and change in the

behaviour of

employees / users

of public buildings

2. Modernization of

school classroom

lighting

3. Replacement of the

fuel oil boilers with

the wood pellet

1. Education

measures and

change in the

behaviour of

employees /

users of public

buildings

2. Installation of

thermostatic

sets


education

Obrazovanje

građana


installation of

thermal solar

collectors on

municipal

buildings

1. Education

measures and

change in the

behaviour of

employees / users

of public buildings

2. Installation of

thermometers in

each room in the

municipal

buildings


education

2. Subsidies for

windows

replacement,

thermal insulation of

building envelopes

and roofs of the

tertiary buildings

3. Education and

promotion of the

40

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

boilers for

residential buildings


installation of PV

panels

energy efficiency in

traffic




1. Campaign One day

a week without a

car

2. Information and

training for

environmentally

sound driving


and change in the

behaviour of

employees / users

of public buildings

1. Education

measures and

change in the

behaviour of

employees /

users of public

buildings

2. Installation of

thermostatic

sets in

residential

buildings

3. Replacement of

the inefficient

light bulbs with

the energy

saving light bulbs

in all households


education


purchase of

biomass fired

boilers


installation of

thermal solar

collectors on

municipal

buildings

1. 1Education

measures and

change in the

behaviour of

employees / users

of public

2. Installation of

thermostatic sets

in residential

buildings

3. Replacement of

the inefficient

lighting fixtures

with the energy

saving lighting

fixtures


education

2. Introducing a car-

sharing model

3. Introducing the

system of monitoring

driving style bus


41

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu





1. The total surface

area of the

installed solar

collectors in the

city

2. Total natural gas

consumption

------

1. Number of

replaced windows

and doors

replaced

2. Number of

installed biomass

boilers

1. The total surface

area of the

installed solar

collectors in the

city

2. Total electricity

consumption

------

Public lighting



------ ------ 1. Total electricity

consumption ------ ------

Transport



1. Number of

vehicles passing a

given metering

point in the year/

month

2. Number of

passengers in the

public transport

in one year

------

1. The volume of

fuel sold

2. Number of

passengers in the

public transport

1. Number of

passengers in the

public transport

in one year

2. Number of

kilometres of

bicycle paths in

the city

------

42

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




1. Electricity

production from

RES in the city

area

------ ------

1. Electricity

production from

RES in the city

area

------




------ ------ ------ ------ ------




------ ------ ------ ------ ------






In the last submitted report, it has been

only indicated share of not started,

------ ------ ------


only indicated share of not started and

43

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

ongoing and

postponed mitigation actions. Sector

tertiary buildings equipment facilities

has the highest share of ongoing actions

ongoing mitigation actions. Sectors

municipal buildings equipment facilities, residential buildings,

public lighting transport and others have equal share of ongoing mitigation

actions (50%)






only indicated share of not started and ongoing mitigation

actions.

------ ------ ------


only indicated share of not started and ongoing mitigation

actions.


[% ONGOING ACTIONS]

750 712 t CO2

92 % ------ ------ ------

161 448

85 %


Residential ------ ------ ------ ------



44

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Renewables +160.7 % ------ ------ ------ ------

Additional remarks


Greenhouse gas emission have in total

increase from the year of BEI (2008) to

the year of most recent data available

(2015) for 4.8%. Transport and tertiary sector contribute the most in greenhouse

gas emission increasement.

Greenhouse gas from emission from transport have

increased by 9,5%, while in tertiary

sector emission have increased by 22%.

The Monitoring Report for the city of Pregrada has still not

been submitted to CoMO

The Monitoring Report for the city of Pula has still not been submitted to CoMO

The Monitoring Report for the city of Belišće has still not been submitted to

CoMO

Some of the necessary data for

the monitoring report are not provided (greenhouse gas

emission per sector and final energy

consumption in the year of the most

recent data available (2015)

45

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Norway

With the area of 324 000 km², Norway has a total population of 5 296 000 [8]. In recent years, the mean

temperature in Norway has generally been higher than normal. The exception was 2010, which was one of

the coldest years since 1900. The highest mean temperature was recorded in 2014 with 2.2 °C above average.

Other years with high averages are 1934, 1990 2006 and 2011 and 2015 - with 1.8 °C above average. In 2016,

the temperature was 1.5 °C above average [9].

Economic activity in Norway is on a rising path and the fall in unemployment continues. Growth is broad-

based. Private consumption is going up and businesses are investing more, both inside and outside the

petroleum sector. Some key figures for the Norwegian economy (NOK billion) [10]:

-Gross domestic product =3 279.4

-Gross fixed investment = 784.2

-Private consumption = 1 474.7

-Public consumption = 790-6

All of Norway’s industries have increased their exports over the past 20 years - by a total of 270%. The

petroleum industry is currently the most important export sector, accounting for 46% of Norway’s export

revenues. This is followed by the manufacturing industry, with around 30 %, and the services industry, with

around 20%. Almost 100% of electricity production in Norway is renewable (hydro power).

Eight Norwegian municipalities have signed CoM. The number of CoM signatories of municipalities in

population group are as follow:


o Number of municipalities S (10,000-50,000 inhabitants):3



409 out of 428 of the Norwegian municipalities (95.6%) have developed energy and climate plans [11].

The share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption is 50.2% of which 5.3% is biofuels and

renewable wastes, 0.7% is wind power and 44,2% hydro power. The share of energy from renewable sources

in gross final consumption of energy, the most significant renewable energy sources is 69.4%.

The basic information about five SE(C)APs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are


46

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 13 Selected SE(C)APs-Norway

Selected SEAP or SECAP Country Population Area [km2]

The number of municipalities

involved

1. SE(C)AP Bærum Energy and climate plan 2013-2017

Norway 125 454 189 1

2. SE(C)AP Hvaler Energy and climate plan 2016-2028

Norway 4540 89 1

3.SE(C)AP Climate and energy plan for municipalities in Indre Østfold 2011-2020

Norway 61 717 2 242 10

4.SE(C)AP Climate plan for Ørsta municipality 2009-2020

Norway 10 812 804 1

5.SE(C)AP Tromsø Municipality Climate and energy plan 2008-2018

Norway 75 638 2 521 1



47

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Bærum Hvaler

Municipalities in Indre

Ørsta Tromsø


20% by 2020 compared to 2008 as

the base year.

To become a Climate neutral municipality

by 2030


the base year.


the base year.


the base year.


Absolute reduction No general CO2

reduction target has set in the SE(C)AP.

Absolute reduction Absolute reduction Absolute reduction

Emission factor which have been used ------ ------ ------ ------ ------

The information provided in Table 15Table 15 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).


Long-term vision

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø

Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality?

YES YES YES YES YES

48

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

CO2 emissions

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


NO YES NO NO NO


YES NO YES NO YES

Energy consumption

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


YES NO YES YES NO


NO NO YES YES NO


NO NO NO YES NO

49

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Buildings

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


YES NO NO NO NO

Does the SE(C)AP contain the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations?

YES NO YES NO YES

Industry

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø

Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector? NO NO YES NO NO


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES

50

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


YES YES YES YES YES


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


NO YES YES YES YES

Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO YES NO NO

Table 16 presents the most common proposed measures and their potential for CO2 emission reduction, for each of the sector included in the analysed SE(C)APs. As analysed SEAPs are from different population size groups, the potential of CO2 reduction has been calculated per capita.



Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in Indre Ørsta Tromsø


1. Replace

remaining oil-

based heaters

with more

environmentally

friendly energy

source

2. Link more of the

existing buildings

to district heating

1. Conversion from oil-

based boiler to

renewable energy

sources

2. Evaluate passive

housing standards for

newbuilding and

rehabilitation

3. Conversion of electric

heaters to district

1. Technical energy and

climate requirements

must be made for

new buildings and old

buildings must be

refurbished, ensuring

equivalent

requirements

1. Detail out all

profitable

energyefficiency

measures in

municipal

buildings

2. Integrate energy

competence and

energy review as

a basis for

1. Encreasing

energy efficiency

in existing

buildings and

setting new

requirements for

the new ones.

2. Installation of air

to air heat

pumps in older

51

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

3. Complete energy

labelling of

municipal

buildings

heating or other

renewable energy

sources in public

buildings

decision-making

in all alternatives

from the

planning stage.

3. Select renewable

energy for indoor

heating in all new

buildings.

buildings that

have no access

to district

heating network


------ ------ ------ ------ ------


1. Processing of

applications and

control will

emphasize

energy content

and prevention

of environmental

and climate

hazards

2. Online energy

advice to

homeowners

1. Energy efficiency and

transition to renewable

energy sources in

households

2. To facilitate and

support the

households’ excess

power production to

the grid

1. Municipalities should

facilitate increasing

share of renewable

energy so developing

district heating and

biofuel will be more

profitable.

1. Systematically

communicate

information on

targets in the

climate plan, new

energy

requirements

and low energy

buildings at pre-

conference with

constructors

1. Gradually

phasing out the

use of oil

heating. Through

a preliminary

project, costs

and savings will

be calculated by

switching from

oil to gas - first

propane, later

LNG when

available - in the

buildings where

this is possible,

52

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

practical and

economical.


reduction in residential buildings equipment/facilities. [t CO2/ capita]

------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------

1. Energy efficiency and


energy sources in

business

2. Encourage companies

to carry out

environmental

certification

1. Municipality should

adapt environmental

guidelines, such as

development density

and requirements for

alternative energy

sources in the

development of

residential,

commercial and

public buildings.

1. Introduce a

routine that

ensures that all

new construction

areas and

business areas

are primarily

assessed with

renewable

energy supply

------


reduction in tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Transport



1. Establish new

free electric car

1. Create multiple

charging stations for

1. The municipalities

should influence the

1. Develop local

plan for walking

1. Development of

new bus flyt in

53

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

parking spaces

with power

outlets at

municipal

parking spaces

2. Develop a plan

for improvement

of cycle paths

and bicycle

parking

3. Work for

securing

pedestrian and

cycle paths to

schools

electric cars in central

locations in the

municipality - both in

public and private

parking areas.

2. Continue work for

better facilitation of

public services,

especially for work trips

to towns and upper

secondary schools.

3. Further focus on the

development of

walking and cycling

routes.

business community

to establish charging

stations for electric

cars

2. increasing the

number of biogas-

fueled busses in

public transport

and cycling with

a uniform design

as a basis for the

municipal area

plan for Ørsta

center and

Hovdebygda.

2. Developing a

more accessible

and affordable

public transport

with broader

network for

reducing

passenger car

traffic.

public transport

should focus on

LNG/CNG fuled

buses (with

external

financing)

2. Reduce the need

for driving to

and from schools

and

kindergartens.

Action Beintøft

("Walking Bus"),

children may go

to kindergarten

close to their

residence. The

kindergarten bus

is assessed,

financed with

funds from the

"reward

scheme".


reduction in transport. [t CO2/ capita]

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

54

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Public lighting



1. Replacement of light fixture for LED lighting

2. Provide LED lights along municipal roads

1. Increasing energy

efficiency in

street/road lighting

------

1. Reduction of

electricity use

heating and

lighting in all

public and

private buildings

by 20% by 2020

relative to the

energy

consumption in

2007

------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------




------ ------

1. Minimum 20% of

energy production

from local power

stations in Indre

Østfold must be

based on renewable

energy carriers.

1. Map potential of

local renewable

energy resources

1. Contribution to

Local Energy

Investigation at

Troms Kraft

Nett, network

consultant. Two-

way revision.

Access to new

55

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

renewable

energy sources

will be

emphasized

when choosing

development

areas.


------ ------ ------ ------ ------




------ ------

1. The municipality

should define their

role as a regional

planning authority

and a climate and

energy strategist for

the district heating

concessionaire prior

to rolling out the

municipal area and in

regulatory plans

1. Contribute to the

establishment of

district heating in

the downtown

Ørsta

2. Map available

waste heat and

set requisite

measures for

utilizing this

------

56

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Industry



------

1. Having dialog with

industries and

businesses on the

municipality's climate

goals , informing them

about public

opportunities/benefites

and encaurage them to

increase energy

efficiency and


energy sources

1. Emissions from

industry sould be

reduced by 20% from

2007 levels by 2020

1. Create

commitment to

environmentally

friendly

operation in the

local business

community

2. Profiling business

that achieve

good results in

reduction of

direct or indirect

greenhouse gas

emissions.

3. Work for

environmental

certification of

multiple activitie

------

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

57

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

proposed measures for CO2 reduction in industry. [t CO2/ capita]



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture.

------ ------

1. Emissions from

agriculture and

industry should be

reduced by 20% from

2007 levels by 2020

2. The municipality

should increase the

proportion of

bioenergy in

agriculture by 10%

annually through

regulation and

stimulation schemes.

3. The municipality and

the agricultural

offices should ensure

framework conditions

that contribute to

reducing nitrogen

fertilizers in

agriculture by 10%

during the planning

period

1. to stimulate

measures that

reduce emissions

from agriculture

2. The municipality

should create a

working group in

cooperation with

agricultural

interests to enter

into dialogue in

order to

contribute

reduced

greenhouse gas

emissions from

agriculture

------

58

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry.

------ ------

1. The municipality

should increase new

planting in the forest

areas and increase

the proportion of

withdrawals by 20%

by 2020

1. To stimulate for

active forestrY

------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries.

------ ------ ------ ------ ------


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Funding



YES YES NO NO NO

59

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


------ ------ ------ ------ ------




------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Table 17 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SE(C)APs.



Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


1. Total electricity

consumption

(GWh/year)

2. Energy use per m2

(kWh per

m2/year)

------ ------ ------ ------

Public lighting

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø

60

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Transport

Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


1. Total gasoline

consumption,

(litter/year)

2. Total diesel

consumption,

(litter/year)

------ ------ ------ ------


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


------ ------ ------ ------ ------


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


------ ------ ------ ------ ------


61

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Bærum Hvaler Municipalities in

Indre Ørsta Tromsø


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

Table 18 presents the progress of the SE(C)AP implementation, for SEAPs for which at least one progress report has been submitted.



Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


------ ------ ------ ------ ------


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø



------ ------ ------ ------ ------


[% ONGOING ACTIONS]

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

The sector with the highest greenhouse gas emission reduction from the year of

------ ------ ------ ------ ------

62

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

BEI to the year of the most recent data available.


Bærum Hvaler


Ørsta Tromsø


------ ------ ------ ------ ------

63

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Latvia

Latvia is one of the three Baltic states, situated on the eastern shore of the Baltic Sea, between Estonia and

Lithuania. The country is also bordered by Russia and Belarus, and it shares maritime borders with Sweden.

With an area of 64 589 km², its mostly flat landscape offers a mix of beaches, rivers, lakes, marshes and

forests. Latvia is divided into five administrative regions: West Latvia (Kurzeme region), East Latvia (Latgale

region), North Latvia (Vidzeme region), South Latvia (Zemgale region) and central part (Riga region). Fertile

low-lying plains predominate in central Latvia, highlands in Vidzeme and Latgale to the east, and hilly moraine

in the western Kurzeme region. Forests cover one-third of the country, with over 3 000 small lakes and

numerous bogs. Climate is temperate, maritime, wet, with four seasons of almost equal length. Temperatures

in January are from -5 to -25°C, in July from 17 to 25°C. The country has a population of 1.95 million people

(in 2017), capital and largest city is Riga.

Economic data of Latvia in 2017 [12] was as following: GDP was 27.0 billion euros and growth of GDP 4.6%,

but GDP per capita was 13. 93 thousand euros; private consumption was 68.3 % of GDP and public

consumption was 9.4% of GDP, inflation rate was 2.9%, rate of wage growth was 7.9% and unemployment

rate 8.7%; exports of goods and services was in value of 16.52 billion euros, but imports of goods and services

was in value of 16.49 billion euros. Growth of industrial production was 8.5% in 2016 (calendar adjusted

data).

• Natural resources peat, limestone, dolomite, amber, hydropower, wood, arable land.

• Agriculture products: grain, sugar beets, potatoes, vegetables; beef, pork, milk, eggs; fish.

• Industries: automotive industry, railroad cars, agricultural machinery, fertilizers, electronics,

synthetic fibers, pharmaceuticals, processed foods, textiles.

• Exports - commodities: foodstuffs, wood and wood products, metals, machinery and

equipment, textiles.

• Exports - partners: Lithuania 17.8%, Russia 11.5%, Estonia 11.1%, Germany 6.3%, Poland 5.6%,

Sweden 5.2%, UK 5%, Denmark 4% (2015)

• Imports - commodities: machinery and equipment, consumer goods, chemicals, fuels, vehicles.

• Imports - partners: Lithuania 16.9%, Germany 11.2%, Poland 10.5%, Russia 8.1%, Estonia 7.7%,

Finland 5.2%, Netherlands 4% (2015) The main branches of industry: synthetic fibres,

agricultural machinery, fertilizers, radios, electronics, pharmaceuticals, processed foods,

textiles, timber.

The number of CoM signatories: 20 municipalities from 119 municipalities. The number of CoM signatories

of municipalities from the following population group:





o Number of municipalities XL (250,000-500,000 inhabitants): 1

The share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption in Latvia is 37.00 %, of which: biofuels &

renewable waste: 31.8%, hydro power: 5.0% and wind power: 0.3.%

64

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

The basic information about five SE(C)APs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are


Table 19 Selected SE(C)APs-Latvia


Country Population Area [km2] The number of municipalities

involved

1. SEAP Jelgava city SEAP Latvia 61 304 60.3 km² 1

2. SEAP Riga city SEAP Latvia 704 476 304 km² 1

3. SEAP Liepaja city SEAP Latvia 76 988 60.4 km² 1

4. SEAP Saldus county SEAP Latvia 27 661 1683 km2 1

5.SEAP Ozolnieki county, SEAP Latvia 10575 286.1 km² 1



65

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Jelgava Riga Liepaja Saldus Ozolnieki


20% until 2020 25% until 2030

By 55% from 1990 till 2020

By 35% from 2006 to 2020

By 20% until 2020 5% in comparison

with 2016


% of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year (2005)

As an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2

emissions in the baseline year)







Long-term vision


Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality? YES YES YES YES YES

CO2 emissions


66

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


NO YES Yes, partly – for

natural gas, coal, etc. NO NO


YES YES YES YES NO

Energy consumption



YES YES Yes, for gas YES NO


YES YES YES YES NO


NO

Consumption of the buildings in kWh/m2

is given for public buildings, the private

building - the description of the

stock and assessment of renovated buildings –

consumption in kWh/m2

Yes, total consumption and per

types of houses -------

No, just the average consumption figure

67

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Buildings



YES YES

Partly – describes number of houses

where EE refurbishment has

been done

YES Yes, the overall

situation, but not in detail


NO NO NO NO NO

Industry


Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector?

No other industry, just the heating sector which is

provided by “Fortum Jelgava “, Ltd. – which

is local heating and electricity producer

and distributor.

From industry - just the heating

production sector and electricity production

sector

YES NO NO



Does the SE(C)AP contain the characteristics of the demand for mobility (need for mobility)? NO

No description of the needs, but provides the description of

what is existent and what is planned (most

YES YES YES

68

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

probably based on

the needs


YES YES YES YES NO


YES YES YES YES YES



Are the main stakeholders’ groups identified in the SE(C)AP? YES

Yes – stakeholders in energy production, consumption etc.

YES YES YES

Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP?

NO

Partly - , there is action plan for public involvement, but not

for stakeholders involvement

YES YES YES






1. Improvement of

EE of municipal

buildings

1. Renovations of

buildings

1. Reduction of

energy

consumption in

1. Green

procurement

1. Energy

management

system

69

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

(concrete

buildings listed)

2. ICT solutions in

energy

management

3. Energy

management

systems

the municipal

buildings –

monitoring of

energy

consumption,

training of staff

on energy saving

measures, on

regulating

temperatures; to

plan investments

for energy

efficiency

improvements.

2. EE refurbishment

of residential

houses

3. Liquidation of

separate boiler

houses and

joining in one DH

system,

substitution the

gas with wood

biomass

2. Inventory of

street lighting -

change of

incandescent

lamps by the LED

will consume less

electricity, part of

electricity

production is

from fossil fuels.

3. Decreasing of

electricity

consumption in

municipal

buildings

2. EE measures in

municipality

buildings

3. EE measures in

public lighting

Potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed measures for CO2 reduction in municipal buildings equipment/ facilities.

0.00383 t CO2/capita (from 2005-2020)

Renovation of buildings connected to the district heating system to achieve a 1.5 % yearly

0.000052 --------- ---------

70

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

[t CO2/ capita] reduction in heat

consumption by consumer


1. EE refurbishment

of multi

residential

buildings –

complex

renovation

1. Renovation of

buildings

connected to the

district heating

system to achieve

a 1.5 % yearly

reduction in heat

consumption by

consumers

1. Implementation

of EE measures

2. Application of

property tax

reduction to

nearly 0 and low

energy

consumption

buildings

1. Elaboration of

buildings

infrastructure

development

plan.

2. EE renovation of

multi residential

buildings.

3. Organisation of

informative

campaigns for

residents

1. EE renovation of

multi residential

buildings

2. Regulation of

heating solutions

in the multi

residential

buildings, where

heating is

provided

individually


0.16658 0.000089 0.01264 --------- ---------


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

71

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Transport



1. Building of the

infrastructure for

Traffic terminal

(Bus station)

2. Electric vehicles

3. Bicycle roads

1. Extent of bio -fuel use in municipal public transport, % of the total fuel consumption

2. Number of hydrogen powered (both fuel-cell andbattery) vehicles replacing city busses

1. Elaboration of

mobility plan

2. Optimization of

the transport

routes

3. Pilot project of

electrical

transport vehicles

1. Elaboration of

mobility plan for

municipality.

2. Development of

bicycle transport

infrastructure.

3. Analysis of

alternative

transport modes

1. Development of

environmentallly

friendly types of

transport


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Public lighting



1. Improvement of EE in public lighting:

2. Modernisation of

the management

system for street

ligting

1. Renovation of city lighting by introducing LED lighting

1. Monitoring of the

energy

consumption for

public lighting

and the

corrective

measures

1. Change of high

pressure mercury

lamps and

incandescent

bulbs to energy

efficient modern

lamps.

1. Metering and

registering of

energy

consumption for

the public lighting

2. Analysis of the

consumption

72

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

3. Reconstruction of

street ligting


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------




Building of cogeneration power station (using wood biomass) in Rūpniecības street 73

--------- --------- --------- ---------


0.07501 --------- --------- --------- ---------




1. Use of RES in heat

production

2. Reduction of heat

losses in the

district heating

(DH) system and

improvement of

1. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of condensation economisers (saving system for

1. Combining the

boiler houses and

substitution of

gas with wood

biomass

1. Elaboration of

heat suply and

building

infrastructure

development

plan.

1. EE measures in

boiler houses

2. Renovation of

heat supply lines

to reduce losses

73

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

the heat supply

security

flue gas heat recovery) installed in the heat sources of JSC “Rigas siltums”

2. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of the absorption- type heat pump in the cogeneration unit of HP “Imanta”

3. Produce additional heat per calendar year with the use of wood chips for the production of energy at JSC “Rigas siltums”

2. Renovation of

heat supply

networks

3. EE measures in

CHP stations and

boiler houses

2. Investment

planning for

modernisation of

DHSs in small

villages.

3. Change of heating

sources from

fossil to RES.

3. Attraction of new

consumers of

district heating


0.2612 0.00015 0.19464 --------- ---------

74

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Industry



None, only production of heat and electricity included

None, only production of heat and electricity include

--------- --------- ---------


0.02512 --------- --------- --------- ---------



Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------


None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------



75

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. None (this is city) None (this is city) None (this is city) --------- ---------



Funding



1. Municipality

budget

2. National and EU

programmes

3. ESCO

1. EU programmes,

as Horizon2020,

Green Investment

programmes

2. ESCO

3. Revolving fund

4. Municipal funding

1. Municipality

budget

2. National and EU

programmes

3. ESCO

1. Municipality

bugdet.

2. National and EU

programmes.

3. ESCO

NO


Not given per tonne of CO2

Not given per tonne/CO2, but the measures of the lowest investment amounts are: 1. Construction of a

hydrogen

charging station

in the city 2014–

2020,

1 million EUR

1. Application of the

reduced property

tax to zero energy

and low energy

buildings

buldings”

2. Attraction of new

customers to DH

system

3. Elaboration of the

procedure of

Not given.

Not given per

tonne/CO2, but the

lowest investment

measures:

1. Metering and

recording of

electricity

consumption for

public lighting

separate units

76

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

2. Creation of an

infrastructure of

slow charging

stations for

electric cars in

the car parking

spaces of the LTD

“Rigas satiksme”

2014 - 2020, 0.92

million EUR

3. Creation of an

infrastructure of

rapid charging

stations for

electric cars

2014–2016, 0.48

million EUR

green public

procurement and

use of it in Liepaja

2. More detailed

recoridng of fuel

consumption for

public fleet




1. Improvement of

energy efficiency

of multi

residential

buildings (high

investment and

complicated

decision making)

1. Complex renovation of 5944 multi -apartment houses with the total area of 11.85 million m². Average renovation costs

1. Energy Forum

once per year to

discuss all the

actual SEAP

measures with

residents

1. EE refurbishment

of private

buildings

2. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

1. EE refurbishment

of private

buildings

2. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

77

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


supply (the

highest

investment)

3. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

approximately 100 EUR/m².

2. Elaboration of energy certificates for 5900 multi- apartment houses (energy audits) with financial aid of the Municipality covering 80% of the energy audit costs

2. EE refurbishment

of private

buildings

3. Questionaires to

obtain the

residents opinion

Table 23 presents the indicators for the monitoring of the progress of proposed measures, listed in the analysed SEAPs





1. Number of

renovated

buildings in the

city

2. Volume of the

measures, %

against the total

building stock

1. Reduction of energy consumption MWh in a calendar year at the end-user level as indicated by the reduction in the amount of energy delivered;

1. Final energy

consumption in

municipality buildings

MWh (separately:

heat, hot water,

electricity)

2. Heat consumption per

building kWh/m2

3. Number of renovated

buildings.

1. Final energy

consumption in

municipality buildings

and residental

buildings MWh.


buildings

(residential/municipal).


buildings

2. Number of installed

heat meters

78

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

2. Comprehensively

renovated multi- apartment houses in the city, number and percentage of the total area;

3. Comprehensively renovated municipality owned buildings in Riga, number and percentage of the total area;

3. Number of buildings

with energy

management system.

Public lighting



1. Saving in energy

consumption of

the municipal

lighting - % of

the total

consumption

--------- ---------

1. Number of newly

installed sections for

public lighting.

1. Number of newly

installed sections for

public lighting

2. Number of projects in

upgrading of street

lighting

Transport


79

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


1. The proportion

of the biofuel

versus the total

fuel amount in

the sector of the

public transport

1. Number of zero emission transport vehicles introduced in the city public transport to replace buses driven on traditional fuel

2. Share of biofuel, in percent of the total combustible consumption in public road transport

1. Length of bicycle

roads, km

2. Final energy

consumption of

municipality transport

fleet


roads.

2. Number of bicycle

parking places.


roads

2. Number of electric

vehicles




1. Energy

produced

(MWh) in a year

using renewable

energy

resources

1. The amount of generated energy (MWh) from renewable energy sources with heat pumps, sun collectors and batteries, fuel elements and other types of renewable energy sources;

1. Increase of RES for

locally produced

electricity


locally produced

electricity.

1. Energy produced

from RES

80

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




1. Production of

energy (MWh)

using renewable

energy

resources

2. Proportion of

usage of

renewable

energy

resources in

heat production

within the

district heating

system versus

the total

amount of fuels

used annually

(MWh);

1. Amount of the heat recovered during the energy generation process, as well as during the technological processes of production (e.g., recovered flue -gas heat through flue-gas moisture condensation, heat recovery from cooling flows with the use of heat pumps, drain water heat recovery with the use of heat pumps, etc.

2. Use of renewable energy sources for energy production in the district heating system, in per


locally produced heat

energy

2. Number of boiler

houses using gas


locally produced heat

energy.

2. Number of heat

production sources

with improved fuel

starge.

1. Number of installed

heat meters

2. Heat losses in the

heat supply

networks, %

81

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

cent of the used fuel amount (MWh) per year



Indicators used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry. ---------

None, just

production of heat

and electricity has

been tackled

None in industry sector,

but number of boilers, RES

installed is monitored as

responsibility of

municipality

--------- ---------





The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP.

Local heat production,

EE measures in municipal buildings,

Residential buildings

Municipal buildings

Renovation of multi residential buildings

Local heat production

residential buildings ---------

Municipal and residential buildings




Local heat production 99.65%

Not available in CoM webpage

Local heat production 86.91%

--------- The plan is just

completed in 2018

82

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

[% COMPLETED ACTIONS] Municipal 0.17%

Residential 0.10%

Residential 5.64%

Other measures 7.43%


[% ONGOING ACTIONS]

---------

It is given that from 1990 to 2020 Riga

reduces emissions per

2258729.1 tonnes CO2/per year

(from about 4 mil. tonnes to about 2 mil.

tonnes)

--------- ---------

Not given, the aim is to reduce 10% of

energy consumption in the municipal

buildings and the related infrastructure, and to reduce 5% of energy consumption in energy production

sector.



municipal buildings,

Residential buildings

Results not available, but as per

calculations within the plan:

Local heat production,

Renovation of buildings


residential buildings ---------

Information has not been compiled, but it would have to be EE

refurbishment of municipal buildings

and multi residential buildings as most of

them have been refurbished




Heat/RES Heat Heat/RES --------- ---------

83

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Spain

The Kingdom of Spain is a country mostly located on the Iberian Peninsula in Europe. With an area of 505 990

km2, is the largest country in Southern Europe. By population, Spain is the fifth in the European Union. Spain's

capital and largest city is Madrid.

Its territory also includes two archipelagos: the Canary Islands off the coast of Africa, and the Balearic Islands

in the Mediterranean Sea. The African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla make Spain the only European country

to have a physical border with an Africa.There are also some small islands in the Alboran Sea.

There are three climatic zones, according to geographical situation and orographic conditions:

• the Mediterranean climate, characterised by warm/hot and dry summers, is dominant in the

peninsula;

• the semi-arid climate, is predominant in the southeastern quarter of the country;

• the oceanic climate, is located in the northern quarter of the country, mainly in the Atlantic region.

In Spain, a country with no hydrocarbon deposits, the contribution from renewable energies to the electric

generation mix has already reached close on 40%. Figure 2 shows the final energy consumption in Spain.

Figure 2 Final energy consumption in Spain [13]

Total Final Energy consumption is 85.874 ktoe and the renewable energy contribution is 15.9%. Spain is the

second-placed country in Europe in terms of wind power generation and the fourth worldwide in terms of

installed power: 23 047 MW.

Spain is a country that has bet and bets decidedly for the development of renewable energies because of

their social, environmental benefits and for their lower energy dependence. The socio-economic benefits

revolve around the creation of employment and business opportunities, both inside and outside our country,

where Spanish companies and technologies occupy a leading position.

There are 1 815 signatories in Spain which 1 512 has already submitted the SEAP or SECAP; 27 Covenant

Coordinators, 9 promoters and 8 energy agencies. This represent around 22% of Spanish municipalities

participating in the CoM. The number of CoM signatories of municipalities in population group are as follow:

84

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

o Number of municipalities XS (<10,000 inhabitants): 1 164




o Number of municipalities XL (>500,000 inhabitants): 9

The most extensive Spanish region and one of the largest of the European Union is Castilla y León, with a

regional territorial area of 94 224 km2 Castilla y León is structured in nine provinces and 2,249 city and town

councils (almost 30% of the existing ones in Spain). Castilla and Leon has an official population of around 2.5

million (2016), represents 5.69% of the population of Spain, although its vast territory covers almost a fifth

of the total area of the country. The population of Castile and León was divided, by province, as follows:

Province of Ávila, Burgos, León, Palencia, Salamanca, Segovia, Valladolid, Zamora.

The basic information about five SEAPs which have been selected for the baseline assessment are presented

in Table 25Table 1.

Table 25 Selected SEAPs- Spain


Country Population Area [km2]

The number of municipalities

involved

1. SEAP Palencia Palencia 79 137 94. 71 km2 1

2. SEAP Soria Soria 40 218 271.77 km2 1

3. SEAP Valladolid Valladolid 325 000 197.41 km2 1

4. SEAP Vall Dén Bas Vall Dén Bas 2 983 90.7 km2 1

5.SEAP La Coruña La Coruña 243 978 37.6 km2 1



85

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Palencia Soria Valladolid Vall Dén Bas La Coruña


20 20 20 20 20


Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction Per capita reduction


The information provided in Table 27Table 21 present the general level of detail of SE(C)AP, mostly regarding the Baseline emission inventory (BEI).


Long-term vision


Does the SE(C)AP contain the long-term vision of the municipality?

YES YES YES YES YES

86

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

CO2 emissions



NO YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES

Energy consumption



YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES


NO NO NO NO NO

87

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Buildings



NO NO NO NO NO


YES YES YES YES YES

Industry


Does the SE(C)AP contain the industry sector?

YES NO YES NO YES




YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES


YES YES YES YES YES

88

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




NO NO NO YES YES

Is the strategy for the stakeholders’ involvement presented in the SE(C)AP? NO NO NO YES YES






1. Minimization

energy demand

for heating and

cooling as well as

the promotion of

renewable energy

sources

2. Conducting energy

audits in all building

3. Replacement oil/gas

boilers to biomass in

Schools

1. District heating

with biomass.

2. Improvement of the

envelope of

Municipal Schools

3. Leak control Plan in

the Supply

Municipality System

of Water.

1. Replacement of

existing thermal

installations by

systems using local

biomass.

2. Progressive

reduction of

electricity

consumption in

interior lighting.

1. Install biomass

boilers in old

schools of Sant

Privat d'en Bas.

2. Guarantee the

creation of a

municipal energy

manager and

create the figure of

a SEAP coordinator.

3. Development of

the ISO 50001

regulations in the

main buildings.

1. Implementation of

a digital platform

for centralizing

energy

management

system in buildings

and infrastructure

municipal service.

2. Programs of audits

and certifications

in energy in

municipal

buildings and

facilities.

89

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

3. Implementation

plans for

geothermal

energy and

biomass in

municipal

buildings.


1. 0.196

2. –

3. 0.381

1. 0.0205

2. 0.0025

3. 0.097

1. 0.108

2. 0.095

1. 0.0042

2. 0.0064

3. 0.0008

1. 0.0037.

2. 0.0022

3. 0.0073


1. Development

programs aimed

at the promotion

housing

rehabilitation.

2. Public

information

campaign for

citizens on the

importance of

energy save.

1. District heating

with biomass.

2. Campaign

awareness

reduction

electricity

consumption.

1. Promotion of the implementation of collective thermal systems of collective type compared to current individual systems.

1. Indicate the

energy rating of

the private homes

for sale in the

municipality area.

2. Encourage

installation of

biomass boilers by

25% of them

houses

3. Encourage

renovation of

class A and/or

biothermal

appliances in

residential

buildings.

1. Urbanize and

provide the city of

“A Coruña” with

new services and

more sustainable

infrastructures for

citizens.

2. Reduce energy

consumption in

construction and

use of buildings,

promoting of

passive

architectural

solution

conditioning in all

projects.

90

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

3. Reduction of CO2

emissions through

the promotion of

energy

certification in

buildings.


---------

1. 0.104

2. 0.036

1. 0036 1. 0.0067

2. 0.159

3. 0.021

1. 0.166

2. -------

3. 0.0074


1. Public

information

campaigns for

service and

tertiary

companies on the

importance of

implement energy

saving measures.

1. District heating

with biomass.

2. Green commerce

net.

1. Planned measures which will lead to the reduction of energy consumption from fossil fuels mentioned in the SEAP.

1. Promote the

adhesion of

companies to the

voluntary

Agreement

Program

Government

Catalonia.

2. Encourage

renovation of

interior lighting

for efficient

lighting and of low

consumption in

the tertiary

sector.

3. Encourage rural

tourism houses

1. Recovery and

treatment of

urban waste.

2. Collection of

landfill biogas.

3. Program of energy

audits in the

tertiary sector.

91

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

and tourist

apartments to

install biomass

boilers.


1. 0.016 1. 0.003

2. 0.0045 ----------

1. 0.0089

2. 0.0066

3. 0.0045

1. 0.010

2. 0.242

3. ------

Transport



1. Construction of a

network of

bicycles lines.

2. Platform of

shared cars for

citizens who

travel in urban

displacements.

3. Dissuasive parking

outside of the city.

1. Renovation

Municipality

Fleet.

2. Replacement

actual ICE buses

by natural Gas

buses.

3. Promote green

procurement in

public contracts

and technical

documents.

1. Modification of internal mobility patterns.

2. Renewal and change of fleet by electric or alternative vehicles.

3. Improvement of the commercial speed and incorporation of the metropolitan area to the Public Transport.

1. Replace the

vehicles of the

municipal fleet

with electric

vehicles or

hybrids

2. Promote

participation of

municipal workers

in training courses

for efficient

driving.

3. Boost the use of

the electric

vehicle.

1. Develop a mobility

management system

for satisfying

demands of citizens

to travel and

reducing private

transport

2. Raise citizen´s

awareness about the

impacts that

displacement of

private vehicles

produce on climate

change.

3. Encourage the use of

bicycles as a means

of transport,

reducing motorized

92

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

journeys and

offering safe

itineraries for

circulation on

bicycle.


1. 0.011

2. 0.015

3. 0.014

1. 0.006.

2. 0.0008

3. 0.16

1.+2. 0.019

3. --------

1. 0.0002

2. 0.0006

3. 0.041

1. 0.0950

2. 0.0096.

3. 0.0058

Public lighting



1. Replacement of

obsolete exterior

lightning (Hg, Na)

by Led lightning.

1. Change of

obsoletes

luminaires by Led

2. Public Lighting

more efficient.

1. Reduction of electricity consumption by 75% in general lighting and 60% in ornamental lighting.

1. Replacement of

mercury vapor

lamps with

compact

fluorescents in

public lighting.

2. Install

astronomical

clocks in the

lighting panels

that work with

photoelectric cell.

3. Replacement of

mercury vapor

lamps with high-

pressure sodium

1. Replacement of

high pressure

sodium vapor

lamps with others

of lower power in

areas above

illuminated.

2. Implementation

of LED technology

3. Implementation

of a Control

Management

software in the

Municipal Lighting

Service.

93

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

vapor lamps in

public lighting.


1. 0.003 1. 0.056 2. 0.072

1. 0.0244 1. 0.0048 2. 0.0042 3. 0.0146

1. 0.0010 2. 0.0014 3. 0.0022




--------- ---------

1. Reduction of primary energy consumption through the implementation of PV systems in self-consumption regimen.

2. Increase in solar dependence on the air conditioning of sports centers and schools

1. Install PV solar panels for different consumption systems in municipal facilities.

2. Install photovoltaic solar panels in a self-consumption systems for residential and tertiary sector of the Vall d'en Bas.

1. Achieve the installation of PV panels of 5 kWp in at least 10 municipal buildings

2. Study the energy savings generated by the lighting of the seafront through solar panels.

3. Study the implementation of small-scale wind turbines to supply electricity and reduce energy dependence.

94

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


--------- ---------

1. 0.0034 2. ------

1. 0.013 2. 0.026

1. 0.00033 2. 0.00023 3. 0.00017




--------- --------- ---------

1. Install biomass boilers and a heat network for domestic hot waters and the heating of various facilities and homes.

1. Identify the potential suppliers of heat and cold, and promote the construction and operation of centralized air conditioning systems from cogeneration plant.

2. Installation of solar thermal systems to produce domestic hot water to support existing facilities and improve energy efficiency in municipal dependencies.

The potential of CO2 reduction (per capita) from the group of the proposed

--------- --------- --------- 1. 0.061 1. 0.0014

2. 0.0010

95

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

measures for CO2 reduction in local heat/cold production. [t CO2/ capita]

Industry



1. Public information campaigns for industrial companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures.

--------

1. Planned measures which will lead to the reduction of energy consumption from fossil fuels mentioned in the SEAP.

--------

1. Holding of a Business Forum on Climate Change within the framework of the Sustainable Energy Network through a voluntary agreement Company-City Council.

2. Creation of a certificate for companies committed to the fight against climate change.


1. 0.019

--------

1. 0.036

--------

1. 0.041 2. 0.032



96

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in agriculture. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction in forestry. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Proposed measure(s) (general) for CO2 emission reduction in fisheries. --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Funding



YES YES YES YES YES


1. Platform of shared cars for citizens who travel in

1. Improvement of the envelope of Municipal Schools

1. Replacement of existing thermal installations by

1. Promote participation of municipal workers

1. Creation of a certificate for companies

97

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

urban displacements.

2. Public information campaign for citizens on the importance of energy save.

3. Public information campaigns for industrial companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures.

2. Leak control Plan in Supply Municipality System of Water.

3. Change of obsoletes luminaires by Led.

systems using local biomass.

2. Modification of internal mobility patterns.

3. Progressive reduction of electricity consumption in interior lighting.

in training courses for efficient driving.

2. Guarantee the figure of the municipal energy manager and create the one of PAES coordinator.

3. Encourage the renovation of indoor lighting for efficient lighting and low consumption in the tertiary sector.

committed to the fight against climate change.

2. Raise citizen´s awareness about the impacts that displacement private vehicle produce on climate change.

3. Identify the potential suppliers of heat and cold, and promote the construction and operation of centralized air conditioning systems from cogeneration.




1. Improvement of

energy efficiency

of multi

residential

buildings (high

investment and

complicated

decision making)

1. Complex renovation of 5944 multi -apartment houses with the total area of 11.85 million m². Average renovation costs

1. Energy Forum once

per year to discuss

all the actual SEAP

measures with

residents

2. EE refurbishment of

private buildings

1. EE refurbishment

of private

buildings

2. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

1. EE refurbishment

of private

buildings

3. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

98

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


supply (the

highest

investment)

3. Use of

environmentally

friendly transport

vehicles

approximately 100 EUR/m².

2. Elaboration of energy certificates for 5900 multi- apartment houses (energy audits) with financial aid of the Municipality covering 80% of the energy audit costs

3. Questionaires to

obtain the residents

opinion






--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

Public lighting



--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------

99

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Transport



--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------




--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------




--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------




--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


100

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




The sector with the highest share of completed measures which have been proposed in the SE(C)AP.

1. Transport

2. Municipal

buildings and

equipment

3. Residential

buildings

4. Public lighting

5. Tertiary building

facilities.

6. Industry

1. Transport

2. Municipal

buildings and

equipment

3. Residential

buildings

4. Public lighting


1. Transport

2. Municipal

buildings and

equipment

3. Residential

buildings

4. Public lighting


facilities.

6. Industry.

1. Transport

2. Municipal

buildings and

equipment

3. Residential

buildings

4. Public lighting


1. Transport

2. Municipal

buildings and

equipment

3. Residential

buildings

4. Public lighting


facilities.

6. Industry





--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


[% ONGOING ACTIONS]

--------- --------- --------- --------- ---------


Transport Residential Transport Residential Industry

(with tertiary)

101

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL FOSSIL FUEL

102

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Detailed and thorough analysis of the pilot municipalities

103

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Moorslede

Moorslede is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SEAP will be revised to

SECAP. Moorslede has a total surface of 3 534 ha and has 11 165 inhabitants [14]. According to the most

recent available statistics [15], in 2017 635 ha of the total area is built area. Of this 80.4% is used for living,

15.7% for economical functions and 3.4% for welfare/recreation/sports. 2 771 ha is non-built area, of which

1 910 ha consists of cropland and 727 ha is grassland.

Moorslede is characterized by agricultural activity, and strongly influenced by the proximity to the REO

Auction in Roeselare (it sells fruits, vegetables and herbs in large volumes for clients in Europe, Canada, the

US and Asia. The clients are mainly retailers, exporters and wholesalers). There is outdoor cultivation and

horticulture. Also, the entire region is characterised by this, as well as by vegetable processing and freezing

industry. Furthermore, Moorslede has a few SME-zones and SME’s located in the living areas.

Geographically wise, Moorslede is located on the “Rug of Westrozebeke”, with a hilly landscape. As for the

rest of Flanders, we see the influence of “ribbon development” which means open space is developed

alongside roads. The Heulebeek is an important watercourse, and causes inundations. There is need for

space for water storage.

The climate in Moorslede (Flanders and Belgium) is a temperate sea climate which means summers are

relatively chilly (mean temperature around 20°C) and winters are rather warm (mean temperature around

0°C).

Concerning the pillars of PentaHelix, Moorslede has no knowledge institutions on its territory, nor is industry

well represented.

Information about previous experience with SEAP development for Moorslede is presented in Table 31-Table

34 for all four phases of the SEAP development.

Table 31 Initiation phase

Municipality council (or equivalent body)

• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?

• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation?

• WVI drafted the SEAP, with a core team of a local representative (alderman on environmental issues) and a civil servant (for environment and nature). The representatives and civil servants responsible for mobility, urban planning etc. were addressed when relevant.

• Stakeholders were not directly involved in the initiation phase since the Covenant of Mayors (CoM) addresses local authorities directly. It is the council that decides whether or not to join. The province of West-Flanders and WVI both promoted CoM. WVI involved the stakeholders in the process of drafting the SEAP, in the name of the municipality and as part of the assignment to draft the SEAP.

104

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Local administration

• Did the local administration encourage the political authorities to take action and inform them about the benefits and necessary resources?

• Did the local administration allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?

• Did the local administration identify the stakeholders, decide what channels of communication/ participation they want to use?

• Did the local administration inform stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collect their view?

• As covenant coordinator WVI promoted CoM in its working area, in association with the Province of West-Flanders.

• The forming of groups (option 2) was done by WVI, addressing the municipalities through their existing platform i.e. “the mayors assemble”.

• In order to know the needs of the municipalities for guidance within CoM WVI interviewed 10 municipalities, during which aldermen, civil servants and the general director were present.

• Other stakeholders were not yet included in the initial face

Stakeholders

• Which stakeholders are participating in the initiation phase?

• What is their role?

• How can they express their views?

• Were potential roles of the stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development explained to them?

• In the initial phase no other stakeholders than WVI and the province of West-Flanders were included

Table 32 Planning phase

Municipal council (or equivalent body)

• Did the municipal council make sure the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase?

• What are their priorities of the SE(C)AP?

• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?

• How ambitious is their vision?

• The council allocated sufficient measures to draft the SEAP.

• The SEAP (with scope 2011-2020) is taking into account the obligated sectors i.e. municipality as an organisation (own buildings, fleet and street lights), residential sector, tertiary sector and mobility as well as renewable energy on the territory.

• Before the SEAP, there was no long term vision on sustainable energy and climate. This planning was until than taken up by the national level (Flanders).

• The SEAP is aimed at the minimum requirement i.e. 20% reduction in CO2-exhaust on the territory.

105

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


• Did the local administration conduct the initial assessment, collect the necessary data, and elaborate the CO2 baseline emission inventory?

• Did the local administration establish the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?

• Did the local administration define the the measures in line with the vision?

• Did the local administration establish the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities?

• Did the local administration involve stakeholders in the SE(C)AP development?

• The SEAP was drafted by WVI. WVI was responsible for the baseline emission inventory, based on a national model. Flanders drafts a general baseline emission inventory every year for each municipality, starting from 2011. Municipalities only have to put in their own energy consumption data (as organisation). These data were provided by the civil servants (in collaboration with the grid operator)

• The objectives are in line with the minimum requirements of CoM.

• Municipal budgets have to be “budgetary neutral” according to European regulations and are determined at the beginning of each legislation (on local level: 6 years). After that, every year an annual account is approved. One of the main problems encountered when drafting the SEAP is that the CoM was signed after the multi-annual planning. It was not possible to have a specific budget appointed to CoM (as a global budget). Every year, of course, actions in relation to the execution of the SEAP could be integrated.

• Stakeholders were involved in the drafting of the SEAP.

Stakeholders

• Which stakeholders are participating in the planning phase?



• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?

• Did stakeholder provide input data and share the knowledge?

• Which are the communication channels with stakeholders?

• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan?

• Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?

• Stakeholders were involved for each of the themes addressed in the SEAP. The following were addressed: the province of West-Flanders (different departments, according to the theme of the workshop), the grid operator, De Lijn and NMBS (public transport), Flemish department on mobility and infrastructure, social housing companies, social renting office, “woonwinkel” (intermunicipal partnership on housing) and Autodelen.net (Flemish network concerning carsharing), the “ council on environment and nature” (a local advisory board with participants from local nature organisations, agricultural sector, inhabitants,…) and the “municipal commission on spatial matters” (a local advisory board with experts and inhabitants)

106

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• They participated in workshops. Their role was giving insight in the current and future planning, working fields, actions which are relevant within CoM and advising on which goals and actions municipalities can set/take.

• WVI used its direct contacts with the stakeholders and addressed the missing organisations in order to find the correct representatives. Each stakeholder participated voluntarily.

• Political authorities approved the plan without objections.

General goals

• What is the overall CO2 emission reduction target (in percentage)?

• Is the CO2 reduction set as an absolute reduction (percentage of the quantity of CO2 emissions in the baseline year) or as a per capita reduction?

• 20% reduction between 2011 and 2020, taking into account the BAU-scenario (without further actions, the prognosis was an increase in exhaust)

• Set as an absolute reduction

Table 33 Implementation phase


• Did the municipal council provide long-term political support to the SE(C)AP process?

• Did the municipal council make sure that the energy and climate policy is integrated into the everyday life of the local administration?

• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?

• How is the municipality council showing interest in the plan implementation?

• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatories?

• The municipal council has approved the SEAP on 11th November 2016, containing the actions until 2020 to reach the reduction target. The alderman part of the core team is following the half-yearly meetings on the elaboration of the plan.

• Every half year, WVI organises a meeting to do the follow-up of the elaboration of the plan.

• Stakeholders are involved in specific projects, dossiers e.g. construction of a cycling path, energetic renovation of public buildings,… The municipality is an active member, dependant on the type of dossier as a lead partner or involved party.

• As a representative of the municipality council, the alderman is present in the half-yearly meetings (as is the civil servant on environment and nature).

• Moorslede has a very close cooperation with the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest”, a group of 7 municipalities who joined CoM under option 2. Moorslede wanted to be part of this group, but couldn’t since

107

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

there is no shared border between both territories (a requirement within the framework). Furthermore, there are knowledge platforms within the territory of the province, in which knowledge is shared.


• How is the local administration carrying out coordination of the implementation plan?

• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act? If so, what was the stakeholders’ response?

• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for energy efficiency and RES?

• Is the local administration networking with other CoM signatories?

• For the half-yearly meetings, the administration has to collect the data concerning the actions that are being executed or planned to be. WVI organises the meeting.

• See answer above (involved in specific projects).

• Moorslede has, together with Klimaatoverleg Midwest, a communication campaign on CoM and the actions within this framework. There is a slogan and logo, communication materials are developed.

• See answer above (connection with Klimaatoverleg Midwest, knowledge platforms). Furthermore, there are regional cooperations, parnerships for example concerning housing/living (“woonwinkel”).

Stakeholders

• Are stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility?

• Are stakeholders encouraging the local administration to implement the measures under its responsibility (if necessary)?

• Are stakeholders encouraging other stakeholders to act?

• Are stakeholders giving general support to the SE(C)AP implementation?

• As also applicable to the rest of Flanders, stakeholders are taking action but the pace is to slow. E.g. inhabitants are doing energetic renovations, but the number of people doing this has to increase.

• NGO’s such as nature organisations urge for action, as well as involved inhabitants.

• In general, stakeholders are involved in the projects that are relevant for them.

Table 34 Monitoring and reporting phase


• Is the municipal council asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan?

• Is the municipal council ensuring that plan updates occur at regular intervals?

• The municipality is on a regular basis informed by WVI, through the half-yearly meetings organised to do the follow up. It is the responsibility of the civil servant to bring the information to the board of mayor and aldermen/city council.

• The SEAP in itself is not being changed, meaning that new actions not yet

108

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

mentioned in the plan are not being integrated in the SEAP. Since the SEAP is a document approved by the city council and handed in to the CoM office, this cannot be done. Off course, they are taken along during the half-yearly meetings and they will be included in the monitoring.


• Is the local administration proceeding with regular monitoring of the plan: monitoring the advancement of the actions and evaluation of their impact?

• Is the local administration periodically reporting to the political authorities and to the stakeholders about the advancement of the plan?

• Is there communication about the results between the local administration and the municipal council?

• Is there communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders?

• WVI organises a half-yearly meeting concerning the execution of the plan. Every year, new data is available from Flanders i.e. a general MEI (monitoring emission inventory) is drafted for each municipality. WVI uses this data and reports it to the municipality.

• The information is distributed by WVI to the municipality i.e. the alderman and the civil servant involved within the core team of CoM.

• It is up to the persons mentioned to further inform the board of mayor and alderman/city council.

• In WVIs knowledge, the interim results are not distributed.

Stakeholders

• Are stakeholders providing the necessary inputs data?

• Are stakeholders participating in plan updating?

• Are stakeholders providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility?

• The data is collected by VITO (Flemish institute for technological research, a Flemish independent research organisation working on cleantech and sustainable development), commissioned by Flanders. They collect the data from the involved stakeholders.

• Stakeholders are not participating in plan updating.

• Up until now, there is no reporting directly from stakeholders. The municipalities provide the data from actions elaborated with stakeholders.

Additional remarks The data made available by Flanders is lagging 1.5 years which means this summer the data for 2016 were publicised.

Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 35-Table 38.

109

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Table 35 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data

CO2 emissions

• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by energy carrier (e.g. natural gas, coal)?

• Is the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors (e.g. domestic, non-domestic, transport)?

• Are the CO2 emissions presented per capita and on municipality level?

• Yes

• Yes

• The CO2 emissions are not presented per capita, only on municipal level

Emission factors reporting unit

• Which emission factors have been used (emission factors for fuel combustion (IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?

• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2

equivalent?

• IPCC

• Tonnes CO2

Energy consumption

• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by energy source (natural gas, fuel oil, etc.)?

• Is the breakdown of energy consumption presented by sector (domestic, non-domestic, transport)?

• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user?

• Yes

• Yes

• The energy consumption is expressed in MWh. In the model, some references are mentioned, which are used in calculations of impact per action e.g. the mean energy use in a dwelling per m² to calculate the impact of renovation.

Energy infrastructures

• In case of existing electricity production plants, as well as district heating/cooling plants, are they presented in the BEI?

• Yes (combined heat and power)

Buildings

• Is the typology of the existing building stock (usage, age, thermal insulation and other energy-related characteristics, energy consumption and trend, the rate of renovation etc.) described in the BEI?

• Are the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations presented in the BEI?

• No. In the SEAP, general data from Flanders is used (e.g. % of the houses not insulated, not having double glazing,...)

• No (but they are for example used in the calculations, when assessing the reduction potential during energetic renovation of dwellings)

110

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Industry

• Is the industry sector included in the SE(C)AP?

• No


• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport presented in the BEI?

• Are the main characteristics of the public transportation network presented in the BEI?

• No. In the SEAP, general data from Flanders is used (e.g. % of short journeys made by car,…)

• No. During the workshop, the problems within this network were addressed directly, from the local knowledge of the persons present (local experience and knowledge).

Additional remarks The BEI is drafted according to the guidelines and templates of CoM.

Table 36 Stakeholders’ involvement

Stakeholders involvement • Are the main stakeholders’ groups

identified in the SE(C)AP? If so, which

stakeholders’ groups have been listed?

• Is the strategy for the stakeholders’

involvement presented in the SE (C)AP?

• Is the level of stakeholders’ awareness

presented in the SE(C)AP?

• Stakeholders were involved for each of the themes addressed in the SEAP. The following were addressed: the province of West-Flanders (different departments, according to the theme of the workshop)(authority), the grid operator (authority), De Lijn and NMBS (public transport) (authority), Flemish department on mobility and infrastructure (authority), social housing companies (authority), social renting office (authority), “woonwinkel” (intermunicipal partnership on housing) (authority) and Autodelen.net (Flemish network concerning carsharing) (NGO), the “ council on environment and nature” (a local advisory board with participants from local nature organisations, agricultural sector, inhabitants,…) (citizens) and the “municipal commission on spatial matters” (a local advisory board with experts and inhabitants) (citizens) These stakeholders are named in the SEAP (within the description of the workshops).

• The strategy is presented in the SEAP. Stakeholders participated during the draft of the SEAP through workshops. They stay involved during the implementation of actions on project base. Citizens were

111

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

reached during the draft of the SEAP through the advisory boards that exist on municipal level (advisory board concerning environment and nature and advisory board concerning spatial matters). The ideas from both boards were investigated and included in the plan when approved by the board of mayor and aldermen. The advisory boards also advise on or help during the implementation of the actions.

Table 37 Proposed measures for the CO2 reduction

Municipal buildings equipment/facilities

• Proposed measures (general) for CO2

emission reduction

• Renovation (partial or total) of municipal buildings

• Energy performant new municipal buildings

• Investments in renewable energy on/in municipal buildings

• Purchase of 100% renewable energy

• Energy management in municipal buildings

• Awareness raising (staff and users of municipal buildings)

Potential CO2-reduction: 20% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)

Residential buildings equipment/facilities


emission reduction

• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures

• Renewing the group purchase for photovoltaic panels

• Group purchase of insulation for walls and roofs (specific for Lichtervelde and Moorslede)

• Launching a group campaign to stimulate renovation of dwellings, especifically aimed at older residents (cooperation between Moorslede and the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest”)

• Actions towards stimulating energetic renovation of dwellings

• Cheap loan for taking energy measures in dwellings (“Flemish energy loan”)

• Actions towards stimulating the building of high energy performant new dwellings

• Stimulating the placement of photovoltaic panels on dwellings

• Stimulating energy-efficient living Potential CO2-reduction: 34% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)

112

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Tertiary buildings equipment/ facilities


emission reduction


• Co-operation between 8 municipalities (Moorslede and the group “Klimaatoverleg Midwest) to set up actions towards the tertiary sector

• Awareness raising towards the tertiary sector

Potential CO2-reduction: 11% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)

Transport

• Proposed measures (general) for CO2 emission reduction


•

• Setting the example: greening the vehicle fleet of the municipality + setting the example by going on foot or by bike → Potential CO2-reduction: 20% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)

• Modal shift towards going by bike or on foot

• Vehicle-restricted city centers and residential quarters

• Supporting technological progress (e.g. electric vehicles)

• Car sharing

• Carpooling Potential CO2-reduction: 25% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)

Public lighting


emission reduction


• Dimming and turning off public lighting during the evening and/or night + energy efficient public lighting (according to urban/regional vision on public lighting)

• Capacity-building and awareness raising Potential CO2-reduction: 34% (calculated starting from the BAU (2020)-scenario)




• Supporting cooperative structures for investing in photovoltaic panels on schools

• Stimulating decentral (local) renewable energy production with the aim to reduce CO2-emissions up to 0.5% by 2020




No measures formulated

Industry Not integrated in the SEAP

113

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


emission reduction





Not integrated in the SEAP

Possible sources of funding

• Which are foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP?

• Which financing sources has been are expected to have the highest share in financing proposed measures?

• Investment: 1 142 500€; exploitation: 345 900€

• with 80% local authority’s own resources, 20% national funds and programmes, 0% EU funds and programmes (no EU-project within the CoM framework in Moorslede)

Additional remarks In the template used to hand in the SEAP (EU-template) WVI have summarized the measures in several groups since the SEAP itself includes a high number of actions (some of which with a rather small scope). This summarisation is also used to fill in this table. The SEAP only contains actions for which the local government is responsible. E.g. awareness raising for energetic renovation of dwellings is included, not included is the investment inhabitants have to make during the renovation.

Table 38 SEAP implementation-indicators


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector (e.g. number/surface area of buildings insulated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed)

Concerning municipal buildings/equipment, the grid operator delivers data concerning the energy use (electricity and gas) in a year total (a total for all buildings). Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source.

Public lighting

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in public lighting? (e.g. number of conventional traffic lights replaced by LED, renewable power installed)

The grid operator delivers data concerning the energy use (electricity) in a year total (a total for public lighting).

114

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements is made available every year by Flanders.

Transport

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)

Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source. Flanders drafts this general MEI every year for each municipality, starting from 2011. Municipalities only have to put in their own energy consumption data (as organisation) to have the complete image. Flanders uses several models to make the calculations per municipality. Especially on transport, the model used changes regularly, which means that also the output differs year per year. Flanders always recalculates the MEI’s for the previous years, when delivering results for the following year (meaning that when the MEI for 2016 was made available, also the MEI of 2015 until 2011 changed).


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. capacity installed)

Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. The energy use is given per year per sector per energy source., as described above.


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production? (e.g. network extension / number of customers)

Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. Per year the production of all of the installations is totalised, as described above.


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)

Not taken into account in the SEAP


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. power installed)

Data necessary for the MEI according to the CoM requirements for all of the sectors mentioned is made available every year by Flanders. Per year the production of all of the installations is totalised, as described above.

Other (waste management, green public procurement, agriculture and forestry related)

Not taken into account in the SEAP, with one exception: the purchase of green electricity by a

115

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors

municipality. Every year the total is made available by the grid operator.

Data collection frequency

• What is the frequency of data collection?

Yearly collection

Funding

• Are there enough financial means for the actions?

• How will these means be sought?

On local level, funding is a bottleneck. For every new action, funding has to be approved by the council for mayor and aldermen. The means are limited, what means that according to the priorities choices have to be made. For ongoing actions, the means are reserved. Flemish subsidies are an opportunity, though also limited and connected with preconditions, which means that only a limited percentage of projects are approved. The same goes for provincial subsidies.

Additional remarks For all of the sectors this following general remark is valid: WVI uses the data made available by Flanders to make the evaluation for each municipality. This data can be seen as the MEI (monitoring emission inventory). When available, additional data is used by WVI. The Flemish data lags 1.5 years e.g. this summer, Flanders distributed the data on energy use and exhaust in tonnes CO2 for 2016, as described above.

Information about the progress of the SEAP implementation is presented in Table 39.

Table 39 SEAP monitoring overview

Status of implementation of mitigation action

• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

• Local heat/ cold production (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

• Transport (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

• Public lighting (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

• Residential buildings (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

The monitoring of the SEAP has to be executed for the first time, deadline is the end of January 2019. For the moment, the data is collected.

116

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (% completed, % new, % ongoing, % postponed, % not started)

• Industry (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)

• Others (% completed, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)

Overall budget spent

• Budget (% budget spent, % overall budget foreseen action implementation)

The monitoring of the SEAP has to be executed for the first time, deadline is the end of January 2019. For the moment, the data is collected.

Estimated greenhouse gas emission reduction according to the implementation status of the actions

• Tonnes CO2/year (% completed, % new, % not started, % ongoing, % postponed)

The municipality received the data in December 2017 from WVI. WVI used the available data from Flanders, until 2015. In the period 2011-2015 the CO2-reduction was 4%.

Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year o the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:

• Municipal

• Tertiary

• Residential

• Public lighting

• Transport

• Non-energy related

• Industry

• Other

The municipality received the data in December 2017 from WVI. WVI used the available data from Flanders, until 2015. In the period 2011-2015 the CO2-reduction was:

• Municipal: not available since part of the tertiary sector

• Tertiary (including municipal buildings): augmentation with 3%

• Residential: reduction of 7%

• Public lighting: reduction of 12%

• Transport: reduction of 4%

• Industry: not taken into account in the SEAP

• Public transport: reduction of 12%

Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:

• Electricity

• Heat/cold

• Fossil fuels

• Renewables

Not calculated since the goals of CoM are reduction in tonnes CO2.

Local energy production- change from the year of adhesion to the submission year (in MWh and percentage) for:

• Electricity consumption

• Non-RES electricity production

• RES electricity production

• Heat/cold consumption

Local energy production from 2011 – 2015:

• Electricity production - PV doubled: +111%

• Number of installed solar boilers: increased with 831,5% (from 19 in 2011 to 177 in 2015)

• RES Electricity production – heat/cold increased with 50%

117

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Non-RES heat/cold production

• RES heat/cold production

• RES Heat production - heat/cold increased with 50%

• There is no non-RES electricity or heat/cold production

118

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Joint SEAP for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and

Willebroek

In the scope of the project joint SEAP (option 2, shared CO2 reduction commitment) will be revised to joint

SECAP. The joint SEAP applies to the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem, Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-

Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek. Together, these municipalities have about 123 103 inhabitants and cover

about 205.56 km², as it can be seen in Table 40.

Table 40 Municipalities that carry out the joint SEAP

Municipality Area Inhabitants

Berlaar 24.57 km² 11507 habitants

Bornem 45.76 km² 21186 habitants

Puurs 33.41 km² 17452 habitants

Sint-Amands 15.58 km² 8480 habitants

Sint-Katelijne-Waver 36.12 km² 20870 habitants

Willebroek 27.41 km² 26223 habitants

Historically, the region is mainly agrarian, with industrial development starting in the 1800’s. Nowadays the

region is more or less agrarian, mixed with residential areas. The houses are very decentralised. In the

municipality of Sint Katelijne Waver and Lier there is a huge amount of agriculture present, focusing on fruit

and tomatoes.

The region is situated around the small centre city of Mechelen and there is a lot of commuting to the cities.

Geographically, the region is mainly flat. It has a maritime temperate, with significant precipitation in all

seasons. The average temperature is 3 °C in January, and 21 °C in July; the average precipitation is 65

millimetres in January, and 78 millimetres in July.

It is also characterized by an extensive network of waterworks and rivers. The rivers Grote and Kleine Nete,

de Schelde and de Nete all flow through the region and still have a big influence in the region.

The Forecast of the Flemish Climate Portal of this region, is that by 2100 the median temperature will be

16,2° instead of the current 10°. It will also have 10% more chance of floods and water.

All five pillars of the PentaHelix approach are present in the municipalities but are not always represented

on a municipal level. Most are represented on a provincial level, or a nationwide level.

Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the municipalities of Berlaar, Bornem,

Duffel Puurs, Sind-Amands, Sint-Katelijne-Waver and Willebroek is presented in Table 41-Table 44 for all four

phases of SEAP development.



• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate a sufficient human resources and

• No, the municipality councils did not provide extra preconditions to the local administration to start the process. However, there already are administrative

119

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?


structures in place. No extra human resources were however allocated.

• Stakeholder participation was not a high priority at the time. However, there was an attempt to involve industry by asking them to sign a letter of intent.






• This part of the process is not known.

• The public authorities were consulted extensively. There was 1 regional steering group, meaning participants of all municipalities attended and 3 local Steering groups, with local stakeholders. More were planned, but no budget was left. Industry was asked to sign a letter of intent of executing the SEAP, but was not part of the decision-making process. The other three stakeholders were not consulted.

• No, this was not a priority at the time.

• Only the public authorities and their decisionmakers were widely consulted.

Stakeholders





• Local administration (municipality departments). No other stakeholders were involved.

• They are in charge of carrying out the SEAP. The monitoring is being done by IGEMO.

• We do not know how the views of administration were conveyed to the stakeholders.

• This information is not available at this time.

Additional remarks The SEAP is joint effort of 6 municipalities around the region of Mechelen. It was drafted with the help of IGEMO as process monitor. It is a SEAP that focusses very much on the action Local Authorities themselves can take.




• The municipal council did allocate funds for projects that fit into the framework of the SEAP

120

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• The main priority is awareness. Lots of actions are taken to raise more awareness of the energy consumption. For example, all the mayors of the municipalities shared tips about saving in your own house.

• Yes, the priorities of the SEAP are in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality.

• The priority of the SEAP is very much focused on awareness and could be more ambitious.







• No, the local administration did not conduct the initial assessment. This was done by IGEMO, based on numbers provided by VITO and supplemented by information of the local administration.

• The local administration set the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable future of the municipality

• Yes, the local administration defined the measures in line with the vision;

• Yes, the local administration established the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities.

• No, the local administration didn’t involved stakeholders in the SEAP development;

Stakeholders

• Which stakeholders are participating in a planning phase?



• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the municipality?



• Did stakeholder participate in the elaboration of the plan? Did stakeholder pressure the political authorities to approve the plan (if it was necessary)?

• Local administration (city departments) and IGEMO

• The role of the local administration was to take part in the development of SEAP. The role of IGEMO was to be a process manager.

• They could express their views at formal meetings and by informal methods. (emailing, calling)

• Yes, they participated in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the city up to some extent

• Yes, stakeholder provided input data and shared knowledge).

• Meetings, emails, formal written communication

• Yes, stakeholder participated in the elaboration of the plan

121

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• No, they didn’t. The only decisionmakers were the local authorities themselves.

General goals


20% till 2020








• Yes, but just formally

• No, they didn’t make sure that energy

policy is integrated into everyday life of the

local administration.

• The municipal council did encourage

stakeholders to act in small ways. They for

example lend their support to the ‘see2do’

project, whereby thermographic scans

show citizens the need to renovate their

house. This was a big success inall

municipalities: Berlaar, Sint Amands,

Willebroek, Duffel, Lier, Sint Katelijne

Waver and Puurs.

• Municipal council shows some interest; by

supporting some projects to do with the

implementation of the project.

• No, the municipal council doesn’t work on

networking with other CoM signatories






• They sometimes respond to projects that

are suggested on the intermunicipal level.

• When the local administration signed the

SEAP, they asked about 100 small

businesses and organisations to sign a

letter of intent stating their support for the

SEAP. There was however no follow up.

• No, there was no information campaign.

• No, it isn’t networking with other CoM

signatories.

Stakeholders


• The local authorities are implementing some of the measures that are under their responsibility;

122

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging the

local administration to implement the

measures under its responsibility

• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging other

stakeholders to act;

• Yes, stakeholders are giving general

support to the SEAP implementation -

mainly concerned citizens.





• No, the municipal council isn’t asking to be

informed regularly about the advancement

of the plan;

• No, the municipal council isn’t ensuring

that plan updates occur at regular

intervals, this is done by initiative of

IGEMO.






• No, the local administration isn’t

proceeding with regular monitoring of the

plan: monitoring the advancement of the

actions and evaluation of their impact;


periodically reporting to the political

authorities and to the stakeholders about

the advancement of the plan;

• No, there is no communication about the

results between the local administration

and the municipal council;

• No, there is no communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders

Stakeholders




• No, stakeholders aren’t providing the

necessary inputs data

• No, stakeholders aren’t participating in

plan updating

• No, stakeholders aren’t providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility

Additional remarks While IGEMO helped make the plans,it was not a part of executing them.

123

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



CO2 emissions




• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier;

• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors.

• No, the CO2 emissions are not presented per capita. They are however presented on a municipality level.




equivalent?

• This information was not available

• The unit used is tonnes CO2

Energy consumption




• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by energy source;

• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by sector

• No, the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment is not presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption



• No, there are no electricity production plants.

Buildings


• No, the typology of the existing building stock is not described in the BEI.

• No, the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations are not presented in the BEI.

124

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Industry


• Yes, it is included, but only for non-ETS.




• No, the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport are not presented in the BEI;

• No, the main characteristics of the public transportation network are not presented in the BEI


Stakeholders involvement

• Are the main stakeholders’ groups


stakeholders’ groups have been listed





• The main stakeholders’ groups are somewhat identified in the SEAP: local administration (city departments), Agriculture, industry and the tertiary sector, as well as private homes of citizens. As such, it can be said that citizens and industry stakeholders are identified in the SEAP.

• Yes. The stakeholders have been identified and it is suggested that they participate on a project-based input. For example, children and schools are taught about Energy Efficiency through the awareness actions. But there is no overreaching structure, such as a permanent advisory board.

• No, the level of stakeholder awareness is not presented in the SECAP.




emission reduction

• Thorough energetic renovation of houses

• Energy saving measures (for example: awareness campaigns in schools)

• Follow up the energy consumption

125

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



emission reduction


• Stimulate citizens to implement energy saving measures

• Stimulate energetic renovation for existing buildings

• Promote projects which are an example Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.



emission reduction


• Stimulate citizens to implement energy

saving measures

• Stimulate energetic renovation for existing

buildings

• Promote projects which are an example

•

Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.

Transport



• Strengthen efficiency of public transport

• Improve infrastructure for pedestrians and bikers

• Stimulate sustainable transport behaviour Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.

Public lighting


emission reduction


• Reduce operating hours of public lighting

• Replace public lighting by LED

• Optimize energy-efficient control of public lighting





• Making up an energy opportunity card for sustainable energy

• Research the possibility to transform biomass into energy

• Introduce a smart electric network Potential of CO2 reduction is not indicated.




• Making up an energy opportunity card for sustainable energy

• Research the opportunity to establish a regional processing company for organic residual flows for the heat production.


Industry


emission reduction


Industry is not assessed in the SEAP

126

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• Agriculture: example: Promote pilot projects of energy savings

• Participation: Create a web platform for exchange of ideas and examples





• Possible sources of funding were not discussed in the SEAP.

Table 48 SE(C)AP implementation- indicators



• Number of buildings renovated

• Number of solar panels/heat pumps

• Total electricity and gas consumption

Public lighting


• Not specified in the SEAP.

Transport




• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. cpacity installed)




127

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu










• The reporting obligations according to CoM SEAP regulation specify the obligation to report every two years.

Funding



• This is not discussed in the SEAP.


Table 49 SE(C)AP monitoring overview









• 100% ongoing for all actions reported at the COM website (this is a summary of the actions in the SEAP)

128

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• There is a big difference between the municipalities. Some have spent already more than foreseen for the entire projects. Others have spent only a little percentage.

• The municipalities do not have a good method for recording this.



• The number given here are for compleated measures in 2015, the last year of which there are available data:

o Berlaar: -11% o Bornem: -1% o Duffel + 28% o Sint-Amands: -1% o Sint-Katelijne-Waver: -6% o Puurs: +35% o Willebroek +26%

Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year o the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:

• Municipal

• Tertiary

• Residential

• Public lighting

• Transport


• Industry

• Other

• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after analysis.


• Electricity

• Heat/cold

• Fossil fuels

• Renewables

• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after energy analysis.






• The report is still not finalized, so it was not possible to obtain requested data. Data will be available after energy analysis.

129

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



130

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Velika Gorica

Velika Gorica is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised

to the SECAP. The City of Velika Gorica is covering the area of 328.65 km2 and has a population of 63 517

inhabitants within the administrative area of the municipality and 31 341 that live within the urban area. It

is the largest and most populous city in Zagreb County. It is a city that has developed as a centre of the

historical region of Turopolje, but also has become one of the largest satellite cities of the capital City of

Zagreb. The meaning and connection of the City of Velika Gorica is also shown in positioning of the Franjo

Tuđman Airport, the largest and busiest airport in Croatia, within the area of Velika Gorica.

Croatia is divided into two predominant climate regions - Continental and Mediterranean although there are

some variations within those climate zones. As everywhere, Croatia's climate is determined by its geography,

which is characterised by a mixture of mountains, plains, forests and a long littoral belt.

The Croatian interior, which includes City of Velika Gorica, is separated from the coast by the Dinaric

Mountains and has a continental climate. Winters get cold, with the mean temperature in January ranging

from 0°C to -2°C. In July, the mean is approximately 22°C although strong heat waves have become more

frequent.

The mountains of Croatia such as the Velebit range and Medvednica (near Zagreb and Velika Gorica) are

cooler and get more precipitation. In winter the mean temperature ranges from -2°C to -4°C and above 1 500

m it is a few degrees colder. Snow is common in the higher elevations, providing Croatia with a ski season.

In summer the mountains are a temperate 10°C to 18°C, which makes them a pleasant escape from the

coastal heat [16].

Its economic development Velika Gorica has based on the small economy and agriculture. The largest

number of employees work in the manufacturing industry (17%) and trade (16%), followed by transport,

storage and communications (9%). The economic base is wood, food, construction, leather and graphic

industries and agriculture.

City of Velika Gorica has representatives of each of the PentaHelix pillars which will collaborate in SECAP

planning..

Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the city of Velika Gorica is presented in

Table 50-Table 53 for all four phases of the SEAP development.



• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate a sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place?


• Yes, the municipality council provided the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocated human resources and provided adequate administrative structures;

• Yes, the municipality council provided the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation.

131

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu






• Yes, the local administration encouraged the political authorities to take the action and informed them about benefits and resources;

• Yes, the local administration allocated enough human resources and ensured that adequate administrative structures are in place;

• Yes, the local administration identified the stakeholders and decided what channels of communication/ participation they wanted to use

• Yes, the local administration informed stakeholders about the process that is going to start, and collected their view

Stakeholders





• Local administration (city departments),Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations ;

• They should be involved in the whole process of development of SEAP from the start to the end, its communication, implementation and monitoring.

• At formal meetings of stakeholder groups, they could address their views in written form and use other ways of communication;

• Their roles have been explained to them at the first meeting of stakeholders organized at the beginning of the SEAP development process.





• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the long-term vision that will shape the

• Yes, the municipal council ensured the necessary resources are in place for the planning phase;

• Their priority of the SEAP was to create measures that will improve energy efficiency in the city and provide at least 21% of CO2 reduction by 2020;

132

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality?


• Yes, the priorities of SEAP are in line with the long-term vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality;

• Their vision was rather ambitious (50.71% CO2 reduction) if all measures were implemented).







• Yes, the local administration conducted the initial assessment, collected the necessary data, and elaborates the CO2 baseline emission inventory

• The local administration set the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable future of the municipality

• Yes, the local administration defined the measures in line with the vision;

• Yes, the local administration established the budget and financing, timing, the indicators and the responsibilities.

• No, the local administration didn’t involved stakeholders in the SEAP development;

Stakeholders

• Which stakeholders are participating in a planning phase?



• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the municipality?





• Local administration (city departments),Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations ;

• Their role was to take part in the development of SEAP from start and to influence all issues of their concern

• They could express their views at formal meetings, in written form and some other channel of communication.

• Yes, they participated in the definition of the vision for a sustainable energy future of the city up to some extent

• Yes, stakeholder provided input data and shared knowledge).

• Meetings, emails, formal written communication

• Yes, stakeholder participated in the elaboration of the plan

• No, they didn’t.

General goals

133

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


21% till 2020








• Yes, but just formally

• No, they didn’t make sure that energy

policy is integrated into everyday life of the

local administration.

• The municipal council didn’t encourage

stakeholders to act

• Municipal council is showing no interest;

• The municipality is showing no interest to

implement the plan;

• No, the municipal council doesn’t work on

networking with other CoM signatories






• There is no coordination, because there is

no public body which would coordinate

activities;

• Yes, the response was very satisfying on

behalf of the city’s company for apartment

buildings management

• Yes, for apartment buildings’ owners

• No, it isn’t networking with other CoM

signatories.

Stakeholders





• Some of stakeholders implementing the measures that are under their responsibility;

• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging the

local administration to implement the

measures under its responsibility

• No, stakeholders aren’t encouraging other

stakeholders to act;

• Yes, stakeholders are giving general

support to the SEAP implementation

134

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu





• No, the municipal council isn’t asking to be

informed regularly about the advancement

of the plan;

• No, the municipal council isn’t ensuring

that plan updates occur at regular

intervals;







proceeding with regular monitoring of the

plan: monitoring the advancement of the

actions and evaluation of their impact;


periodically reporting to the political

authorities and to the stakeholders about

the advancement of the plan;

• No, there is no communication about the

results between the local administration

and the municipal council;

• No, there is no communication about the results between local administration and stakeholders

Stakeholders




• No, stakeholders aren’t providing the

necessary inputs data

• No, stakeholders aren’t participating in

plan updating

• No, stakeholders aren’t providing comments on the report and report on the measures under their responsibility



CO2 emissions



• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier;

• Yes, the breakdown of CO2 emissions presented by sectors: building sector, transport, public lighting)

• Just on the municipality (city) level

135

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu





equivalent?

• IPCC

• Tonnes CO2

Energy consumption




• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by energy source;

• Yes, the breakdown of energy consumption is presented by sector

• Yes, the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment is presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption



• Yes, district heating is presented in the BEI

Buildings



• Partially yes (usage/purpose, energy consumption)

• Yes, the minimal legal energy requirements for new constructions and major renovations are presented in the BEI

Industry


• No, it’s not included.



• No, the characteristics of the demand of mobility (needs for mobility) and modes of transport are not presented in the BEI;

136

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


• Yes, the main characteristics of the public transportation network are presented in the BEI









• The main stakeholders’ groups are identified in the SEAP: local administration (city departments), Croatian craft chamber; Croatian chamber of commerce, Croatian entrepreneur association, Croatian Employer’s Association, Academia, NGOs, consumer/user associations;

• Yes. The stakeholders have been identified and it was suggested to form an energy council and task force group for the SEAP implementation. The energy council is an advisory and monitoring body that should be formed at the early beginning of the process of SEAP development. Energy council is involving the following members: representatives of the city, of the stakeholder groups, proved energy experts from the area of energy, building and spatial planning and from transport and communal infrastructure. The main purpose of the energy council is to monitor the development, to communicate the plan (internal and external), to monitor and evaluate its implementation and to report about it to city council. The purpose of task force group is monitoring of the SEAP implementation, to develop the communication strategy, to prepare the documentation for the public procurement procedures;

• Yes, to some extent. Supervisory and working bodies have been identified – Energy council and working group and their tasks have been briefly elaborated in

the SEAP.

137

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




emission reduction

• Introduction of informational system for energy management

• Centralized data gathering for buildings (typology of the buildings, energy consumption, reconstruction data etc.)

• Remote metering of energy consumption

• Buildings registry

• Buildings energy audits



emission reduction


2 types of measures – for existing buildings and for new construction. Measures for new buildings are that Council adopts decision to reduce the level of communal fee for buildings that implement RES in different rates depending on energy standard achieved. For existing buildings:

• Co-financing of envelope reconstruction

• Co-financing of solar thermal systems for hot water preparation

• Co-financing of thermostatic valves installation

• Replacement with household devices with more efficient ones

• Installation of energy saving lamps

• Installation of small PVs up to 30 kW

Potential of CO2 reduction – 10 096 t



emission reduction


• Installation of solar systems on commercial buildings

• Installation of energy saving lamps

• Council adopts decision to reduce the level of communal fee for buildings that implement RES in different rates depending on energy standard achieved in commercial sector

• Installation of small PVs up to 30 kW


Transport



• Introduction of 10% of biofuels in fuel mix

• Implementation of fees for traffic pollution in the City centre

• Promotional, informational and educational activities

138

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Procurement of new vehicles for the purpose of city administration using green procurement practice

• Improvement of rail traffic

• Improvement of bus traffic

• Park and ride and bike park

• Biodiesel production support for the bus usage

• Cycling traffic improvement

• Closing the city centre for traffic

• Car sharing deployment


Public lighting


emission reduction


• Modernisation of public lightning Potential of CO2 reduction – 287 t




Local electricity production is not assessed in the SEAP




Local heat/cold production is not assessed in the SEAP

Industry


emission reduction


Industry is not assessed in the SEAP




Other sectors are not assessed in the SEAP.



• Foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SEAP are:

o Public

139

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


• local authority’s own resources

• national funds and programmes

• EU Funds and programmes o Private

• ESI funding and local authority own budget foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP

Table 57 SEAP implementation- indicators



• Number/surface area of buildings insulated [-/m2]

• Surface area of solar thermal panels installed [m2]

• Surface area of the building covered by the measuring devices;

• Number of lamps replaced;

• Surface of installed PV module (m2);

• Number of boilers replaced [-];

• Number of electrical appliances replaced [-];

• Number/surface area of buildings retrofitted [-/m2];

• Number of energy audits;

• Total annual heat and fuel energy consumption - data known from Energy Review Report (kWh / year);

• Total annual electricity consumption - data known from Energy Review Report (kWh / year);

• Total energy consumption according to Energy Review report (kWh / year);

Public lighting


• Number of replaced bulbs;

• Number of working hours of old bulb yearly;

• Number of working hours of new bulb yearly;

• Smart regulation system of public lighting – implemented or not?

Transport

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport? (e.g. the number of public transport

• Number of public transport passengers (bus and train);

140

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

passengers per year, total energy consumption of renewable fuels in public fleets, number of charging points)

• Public transport network extension (km) / Number of services per day [-];

• Car classification depending on which fuel type a car should use;

• Number of city’s vehicles replaced with alternative fuel vehicles;

• Number of alternative fuel buses purchased (which kind of fuel: gas, biodiesel: gas, biodiesel),

• Fuel consumption in public transport (bus and train);

• Number of electric charging stations;

• Smart signalization (traffic lights, yellow lines for public transport);

• Cycling network extension (km);

• Number of bicycle parking spaces;

• Public bicycle system;

• Raise awareness activities;

• Number of car share vehicles and locations;

• Integrated ticketing system in public transport;

• Subsidies in public transport;

• Pedestrian zone in city center;

• Automatic park charging service in city center;

• Eco-tax for vehicles in city center;

• Park and ride train service;


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production? (e.g. cpacity installed)

Not relevant, as the local electricity production was not assessed in the SEAP.



• Extension of district heating networks – new segments and number of users;

• Capacity installed [MW] .



Not relevant, as the industry sector was not assessed in the SEAP.

141

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Not relevant as the other sectors were not assessed in the SEAP.



• Different for different sectors, as some of them are related to annual reporting according to national legislation. Other have reporting obligations according to CoM SEAP regulation

Funding



• The budget of the city is limited and is not enough for implementation of all measures.

• EU programmes, ESI funds and some alternative financial instruments have been suggested.

Since the progress report for the city of Velika Gorica is still not finalized, it was not possible to obtain data about the implementation of the measures proposed in the SEAP.

142

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Våler

Våleris is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be revised. With the

area of 257 km², the city of Våler has a total population of 5471 [8]. The Våler municipality is located within

the mountainous area in north-west of Østfold region. The total energy use of the municipality is 10 GWh/

year. The population in the municipality has shown growth since 1950, in the ten-year period 2007-17, with

an average of 2.5 per cent annually against 1.1 per cent in the County as a whole. Agriculture is dominated

by grain cultivation and livestock farming. The main industries are the food industry, manufacturing industry

and wood industry.

During the months of July and August the weather is most likely with pleasant average temperatures. Cold

season / winter normally starts from mid-October and continues in the months December, January and

February. On average, the warmest month is July and the coolest month is January. September is the wettest

month, while February is the driest month

In 2017, the municipality's operating income per capita was 74 915 NOK, while the local government

expenditure per capita was 71 768 NOK. The municipality's loan debt per capita was 39868 NOK at the same

year.

The main industries are the food industry, manufacturing industry and wood industry. Agriculture is

dominated by grain cultivation and livestock farming.

Presenters of the PentaHelix pillars in the municipality consist of regional authorities, NGOs and businesses.

Academia has no presenters in Våler.

The latest climate and energy plan of Våler municipality has approved in 2012 by the Municipality board. The

plan has ambitious goals for reducing 15% GHG emissions below the 1995 levels by 2030.

Information about previous experience with SECAP development for the city of Våler is presented in Table

58-Table 61 for all four phases of the SECAP development.


Municipality council


• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholder’s participation?

• Yes, the municipality council has the necessary administrative preconditions and allocated human resources in place.

• The municipal council is aware of the importance of the stakeholder participation and is mentioning that in the climate and energy plan, however the plan has no structured procedure for involving stakeholder involvement.



• Yes, the political authorities have been informed about benefits of a climate and energy plan particularly from an economic viewpoint.

143

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• Yes, an administrative officer, a project manager and a case handler were coordinating and leading the planning process.

• No

• Yes, the draft plan has been sent out to stakeholders for getting their feedback prior to the municipal council’s approval.

Stakeholders





• None

• Not available

• The stakeholders have provided their feedback to the draft plan but have no defined role in the implementation process.

• Not available


Municipal council



• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the vision previously defined?


• Yes, the municipal council have assigned three persons for leading and coordinating the planning phase.

• To utilize more environmentally friendly energy sources where local value creation and local utilization of raw materials will be the first choice.

• Yes, they were in line with the defined vision.

• Ambitious enough for a small municipality like Våler.



• Did the local administration establish the vision and the objectives that support the vision?

• Did the local administration define the policies and the measures in line with the vision and the objectives?

• Yes, all the necessary data and information have been collected from the national statistic centre.

• Yes, the vision and supportive actions have been defined.

• Yes, the plan consists of policies and measures that are relevant to the vision and objectives.

• Yes, the timing, budget and the responsibilities have been established but not the indicators.

• Yes, the local administrative did send the draft plan to the stakeholders for their feedback.

144

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Stakeholders




• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision?





• Not available

• Not available

• By sending their feedback/comments on the draft plan.

• Not available

• Not available

• Email

• Not available

• Not available

General goals


15%


Municipal council



• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act?


• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatures?

• Yes, the plan is approved by the municipal council which is also a political body.

• Yes, the plan has set targets and measures for municipal operations.

• Yes

• The Våler municipality has no well-structured implementation plan.

• No



• The Våler municipality has no well-structured implementation plan.

• Not available

145

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act?

• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for EE and RES?


• Not available

• No

Stakeholders





• Not available

• Not available

• Not available

• Not available


Municipal council



• No

• No






• No

• No

• No

• No

Stakeholders

146

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• No

• No

• No

Information about the SECAP which will be revised are presented in Table 62-Table 65.


CO2 emissions




• No

• Yes

• No



• Which emission reporting unit have been used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2 equivalent?

• Not available

• Tonnes CO2 equivalent

Energy consumption



• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user

• Yes, the breakdown is by Electricity, oil products biofuels and natural gas.

• Yes, the breakdown of transport road traffic and other traffics.

• No



• No, however an assessment of the local capacity for the future of energy production from renewable resources is presented in the BEI

147

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Buildings



• No, there is no detail information on building stock in the plan.

• No

Industry


• The plan contains information about the energy use and emissions from industrial sector. Våler municipality has limited industrial activities.


• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility and modes of transport presented in the BEI?


• Yes, the BEI has set measures on mapping of mobility and modes of transport e.g. cycling public transport and pedestrian roads.

• No

Awareness

• Is the level of awareness of the population and stakeholders with reference to energy efficiency and potential savings presented in the BEI?

• No







• Yes, public, businesses and NGOs

• No




• Not available

• Not available

148

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




emission reduction


• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available

Transport



• Not available

• Not available

Public lighting



• Not available Not available

Green public procurement



• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available

Others (e.g. agriculture, forestry, fisheries)


• Not available

• Not available

149

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Industry


emission reduction


• Not available

• Not available


• Are the possible sources of funding listed in SE(C)AP? If so, which sources are proposed (European funds, national funds, ESCO companies etc.)


• Yes, municipal resources, also external funds like ENOVA (Norwegian government enterprise responsible for promotion of environmentally friendly production and consumption of energy.)

• The municipal sources

Additional remarks The overall emission reduction target for the Våler community is 15% reduction from the 1995 levels by 2030. However, the plan does not contain sectoral emission reduction measures, and instead it contains energy-use reduction measures.


Transport sector

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport sector?

• No indicators have defined in the plan

Public lighting




• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector? (e.g. total surface of solar collectors, total electricity consumption of households)


Involvement of the Industry (if included in the private sector SE(C)AP)


150

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Which indicators are being used to monitor involvement of the private sector in the SE(C)AP implementation? (e.g. the number of companies involved in energy services, energy efficiency and renewable energies business)







Other (waste management, green public

procurement, agriculture and forestry related)






Funding

• Are there enough financial means for the

actions?


• Yes

• All the financial means for the implementation of the measures have been allocated from the municipal budget

Information about the progress of the SECAP implementation is presented in Table 66.

Table 66 SECAP monitoring overview





• Not available

151

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu








• Not available



• Not available

Greenhouse gas emission per sector- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in tonnes CO2eq and percentage) for:

• Municipal

• Tertiary

• Residential

• Public lighting

• Transport


• Industry

• Other

Yes, the GHG emmision change is presented for

• Buildings (Stationary combustion)

• Industry (Process emissions)

• Transport (Mobile sources)

Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:

• Electricity

• Heat/cold

• Fossil fuels

• Renewables

Yes (in GWh):

• Electricity

• Fossil fuels

• Natural gas

• Biofuels

152

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Local energy production- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:







• Not available

Additional remarks According to Norwegian Planning Act, the municipalities should review, and possibly update their existing plans and therefore most of the municipal SE(C)AP including Våler’s SE(C)AP has no specific statement on monitoring and reporting routines. Implementation of the planned goals and measures are divided among the corresponding departments at the municipality. Each department creates its own report, and all will be collected at the end of the year for creating the annual municipal report. The progress of the planned goals/measures may be found in fragmented chapter within the annual municipal reports. In addition, in some occasions, special reports may be written on specific climate and energy projects for politicians and decision makers.

153

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Sarpsborg

Sarpsborg is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be revised. With

the area of 405 km², the city of Sarpsborg has a total population of 55543 [8]. Sarpsborg is located at the

center of Østfold county, close to both Oslo and Sweden, and with 80 kilometers of coastline towards the

Oslofjord. Sarpsborg is an important export port; Main export goods are pulp, paper and chemical products.

Sarpsborg is an important hub on the railway; here the east and east lines of Østfoldbanen meet.

Sarpsborg enjoys milder climate than inland regions in Norway. During the months of July and August the

weather is most likely with pleasant average temperatures. Cold season / winter normally starts from mid-

October and continues in the months December, January and February. On average, the warmest month is

July and the coolest month is January. September is the wettest month, while February is the driest month.

In 2017, the municipality's operating income per capita was 75 442 NOK while the local government

expenditure per capita was 72 758 NOK. The municipality's loan debt per capita was 60 355 NOK at the same

year.

The main industrial actor in Sarpsborg is Borregaard biorefinery, which is particularly characterized by wood

processing and chemical industry. Other important sectors are food processing (including Øsfoldmeieriet and

Nortura Sarpsborg) and engineering industry (especially fabricated metal products) with respectively 29 and

17 percent of industry employment).

Presenters of the PentaHelix pillars in the municipality consist of regional authorities, NGOs, businesses,

agricultural association and public transportation. Academia has no presenters in Sarpsborg.

The latest climate and energy plan of Sarpsborg municipality has approved in 2011 by the Municipality board.

The plan has ambitious goals for reducing 50% GHG emissions below the 1991 levels by 2020.

Information about previous experience with SECAP development for Sarpsborg is presented in Table 67-

Table 70 for all four phases of the SECAP development.


Municipality council


• Did the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders participation?

• Yes, a team of administration staff with multidisciplinary background have been assigned to work with the plan.

• Yes, the local stakeholders have been informed and invited to participated in work meetings and a seminar.



• Yes, the local politicians have been invited to the planning seminar and provide their feedbacks.

• Yes, from the municipal administration.

154

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




• Yes, the local energy producers, research institutes, regional authorities, industries and businesses have been involved through meetings and seminars.

• Yes, the stakeholders have been informed about the process and been encouraged to provide their feedbacks/comments to the process.

Stakeholders





• Local businesses and industries, interested organizations, regional authorities, Farmers' Association, local energy companies and the Norwegian Society for the Conservation of Nature

• To provide their feedback/comments on the plan process, also their future development plans.

• They expressed their views through work meetings.

• The explanation has been provided in a working seminar


Municipal council



• Are the priorities of SE(C)AP in line with the vision previously defined?


• Yes, a team of administration staff with multidisciplinary background have been assigned to work with the plan.

• To provide information/data needed for setting the future goals and measures in reducing direct climate emissions (in transport, agriculture, industries etc.) to 50% of 1991 levels by 2020.

• Yes

• High ambitious



• Did the local administration establish the vision and the objectives that support the vision?

• Yes, the local administration did the initial job in collaboration with the consultant company named Sweco Norge AS.

• Yes

• Yes

• Yes

• Yes

155

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Did the local administration define the policies and the measures in line with the vision and the objectives?



Stakeholders




• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision?





• Regional authorities, inhabitants, businesses/indistries and NGO’s

• To give feedback in prioritizing and setting goals and actions required for emissions reduction in the society.

• They deliver they viewpoints and comments during the planning process.

• Yes

• Yes

• Meetings, email and phone conversation

• No

• No

General goals


50%


Municipal council



• Did the municipal council encourage stakeholders to act?


• Is the municipal council networking with other CoM signatures?

• Yes

• Yes, particularly within the internal operations e.g. replacing the fossil-based vehicles with electric cars in the municipal fleet and connecting the municipal buildings to the local district heating network.

• Yes, the municipal council is in a close collaboration with stakeholders

• They ask for status reports about the plan implementation.

• No

156

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



• Did the local administration motivate stakeholders to act?

• Was there some type of information campaigns which has for aim to inform stakeholders about the resources available for EE and RES?


• Not available

• Yes

• Not available

• No

Stakeholders





• The stakeholders in public sector are implementing the tasks that have been assigned to them (e.g. the regional government and national road authorities).

• Yes, in some cases for example, speeding up the installation of infrastructure for charging stations.

• Not available

• Such information is not available


Municipal council



• There is no regular reporting procedure for the climate plan progress.

• Not available





• No, there is no regular monitoring and reporting procedure.

• No

• No

• No

157

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Stakeholders




• Yes

• No, the plan has not been updated after approving by the municipal council in 2011.

• Not available



CO2 emissions




• No

• Yes

• No


• Which emission factors have been used

(emission factors for fuel combustion

(IPCC) or Life Cycle Assessment (LCA))?

• Which emission reporting unit have been

used (tonnes CO2 or tonnes CO2

equivalent?

• Not available

• Tonnes CO2 equivalent

Energy consumption



• Is the assessment of the energy efficiency of buildings and equipment presented with the efficiency indexes of energy consumption, such as: kWh/ m2, kWh/m2 – user

• Yes, the breakdown is by Electricity, biomass, natural gas, oil products and waste.

• Yes

• No

158

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



• Yes, local production of hydropower (844 GWh/year), waste energy, both incineration and excess industrial waste heat (390 GWh/year), forestry biomass (40 GWh/year), district heating (22 GWh/year)

Buildings



• No, there is no detail information on building stock in the plan.

• No

Industry


• There is no chapter or section on industry, however, the information on energy use and emissions from industrial sector is provided in the plan.


• Are the characteristics of the demand of mobility and modes of transport presented in the BEI?


• Yes, the special focus is on developing public transport, bicycle and pedestrian roads.

• Yes

Awareness

• Is the level of awareness of the population and stakeholders with reference to energy efficiency and potential savings presented in the BEI?

• No







• Yes, public, businesses and NGOs

• No

159

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu





• Not available

• Not available



emission reduction


• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available

Transport



• Not available

• Not available

Public lighting



• Not available

• Not available

Green public procurement



• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available



• Not available

• Not available

160

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Industry


emission reduction

• Potential of CO2 reduction from the

proposed measures

• Not available

• Not available




• Not available

• Not available


• Are the possible sources of funding listed in SE(C)AP? If so, which sources are proposed (European funds, national funds, ESCO companies etc.)

• Yes, mostly from the municipal resources, also some external resources e.g. the national government.

Additional remarks The overall emission reduction target for the Sarpsborg community is 50% reduction from the 1991 levels by 2020. However, the plan does not contain sectoral emission reduction measures, and instead it contains energy-use reduction measures.

Table 74 SECAP implementation- indicators

Transport sector

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the transport sector?

• Total km of bicycle road network

• Total bicycle parking places

• Number of alternative fuel (pump) stations

• Number of charging stations

• Number of green cars sold

• Number of electric/biogas cars in municipal services

Public lighting


• None

Building sector

161

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in building sector? (e.g. total surface of solar collectors, total electricity consumption of households)

• Number of buildings connected to district heating



• None

Involvement of the private sector

• Which indicators are being used to monitor involvement of the private sector in the SE(C)AP implementation? (e.g. the number of companies involved in energy services, energy efficiency and renewable energies business)

• None


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local electricity production?

• None


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the local heat/cold production?

• None



• None (the municipality has an internal monitoring system for environmental waste management and green Public procurement, but no indicator is stated in SE(C)AP).



• Annual

Funding

• Are there enough financial means for the

actions?


• No, preliminary financial estimation for implementation of some measures have been increased over time and today more financial resources are required.

• By allocating more internal resources

162

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu











• Not available



• Not available



• Not available


• Municipal

• Tertiary

• Residential

• Public lighting

• Transport


• Industry

• Other

• Not available

Final energy consumption per energy Carrier - change from the year of the BEI to the most

• Not available

163

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:

• Electricity

• Heat/cold

• Fossil fuels

• Renewables

Local energy production- change from the year of the BEI to the most recent data available (in MWh and percentage) for:







• Not available

Additional remarks According to Norwegian Planning Act, the municipalities should review, and possibly update their existing plans and therefore most of the municipal SE(C)AP including Sarpsborg’s SE(C)AP has no specific statement on monitoring and reporting routines. Implementation of the planned goals and measures are divided among the corresponding departments at the municipality. Each department creates its own report, and all will be collected at the end of the year for creating the annual municipal report. The progress of the planned goals/measures may be found in fragmented chapter within the annual municipal reports. In addition, in some occasions, special reports may be written on specific climate and energy projects for politicians and decision makers.

164

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Salamanca

Salamanca is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which individual SECAP will be developed.

The city of Salamanca lies on several hills by the Tormes River. It has a warm-summer Mediterranean climate.

Its Old City was declared a UNESCO Woorld Heritage Site in 1,988. With a metropolitan population of 144,179

and a population density of 27. Its economy is due to the famous University with more than 30,000 students

and lot of tourists. It is located 200 kilometres from Madrid and 80 km of the Portuguese border. It is

initiating the process to a tender for a technical assistant to elaborate the plan. EREN is helping them with

the emission inventory and writing of the technical and administrative tender and organising the stakeholder

task force group as well as providing energy data.

Information about current progress of SECAP development for Salamanca is presented in Table 76 and Table

77.





• Yes, but with insufficient human resources.

• Yes there will be promote and supported through a future tender- They use previous intra municipal working group for stakeholders’ group.






• Yes.

• No but it has support from EREN and a technical assistant is foreseen

• Yes.

• Not at all. •

Stakeholders



• The 5 pillars of the PentaHelix

165

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



• Each stakeholder has to discuss about their role and propose solutions, proposal and provide data or studies.

• Through a questionnaire, but the discussion is open to contact with EREN or Council directly.

• No, to all them yet.

Additional remarks Salamanca is initiating the process to a tender for a technical assistant to elaborate the plan. EREN is helping them with the emission inventory and the writing of the tender.








• Salamanca signed CoM and is committed to developing SECAP and achiving the CO2 reduction

• Yes it is.

• 3 (Between 1 to 5)







• Not alone, but with the support of EREN and an external expert in emission inventory.

• Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality

• Yes.

• The local administration established the budget and financing, as well as responsibilities, but did not establish the timing and indicators.

Stakeholders



166

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu








• Preparing the process to contract, planning goals and providing data.

• With questionnaire or by email, phone.

• No, by the moment only Public Authorities were included in defining the vision for the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality

• No, by the moment.

• The process of stakeholder participation has not yet begun.

• The process of stakeholder participation is starting.


• No, because most of the political authorities are already convenced.

General goals

• What is the overall CO2 emission

reduction target (in percentage)?


• At least 40% reduction GHG (in relation to 1990 levels).

• It Is set as an absolute reduction

Additional remarks Salamanca is initiating the process to procure the SECAP The participation of local stakeholders is foreseen in the coming months.

167

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Palencia

Palencia is the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised to

the SECAP.The city of Palencia is 749 m of altitude and a population of 78,892 inhabitants where are include

10 municipalities from its surroundings, and a population density of 22.3. The city is located in south of Tierra

de Campos, and lies in the north of the central Spanish plateau, the Meseta Central. Its climate is Continental

Mediterranean with very cool winters. Food industries (biscuit elaboration) have influence even in the city.

Palencia is one of the few municipalities with SEAP in Castilla y León.

Information about previous experience with SEAP development for the Palencia is presented in Table 78-

Table 81 for all four phases of the SEAP development.





• Yes, but with insufficient economical resources.

• Yes, there will use as base a previous working group for Agenda 21 for organising the stakeholders PentaHelix group.






• Yes.

• Not yet. but it has support from EREN

• Not yet

• Not, by the moment.

Stakeholders





• Propose measures for the new plan, provide data and elaborate some of the SECAPs parts if it is possible.

• Not yet define

168

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


• Not yet.







• Yes, but not foreseen financial resources yet.

• Palencia pretend to renovate CoM by 2030 commitment and update its actual SEAP.

• Yes it is.

• 4 (Between 1 to 5).







• Not alone. But with the support of EREN and an external expert in emission inventory.

• Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future of the municipality

• They will work on the definition of the measures in line of vision after the inventory and vulnerability assessment.

• No.

• Not yet for the SECAP, neither for the previously developed SEAP.

Stakeholders






• Only Public Authorities. But it will be the 5 pillars of the PentaHelix

• Preparing the process to contract and planning goals and provide data.

• With questionnaire or by email, phone.

• No. by the moment only Public Authorities.

• Not yet.

• The process of stakeholder participation has not yet begun.

169

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




General goals




• At least 40% reduction GHG (in relation to 1990 levels).

• It Is set as an absolute reduction








• It has support political support for SEAP and from now for SECAPs.

• The council integrated the climate and energy sustainable policies in daily life.

• The council take into account the member from Agenda 21.

• The Council of Palencia has implemented most of the measures from its SEAP.

• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before Pentahelix.






• It has been foreseen an annual budget for implementing the action and named a technical responsible of the CoM issues in the Council.

• The council has not motivated much more the stakeholders to act.

• It was given publicity all the actions implemented in general.

• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before PentaHelix.

170

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Stakeholders





Stakeholders had not a so active role for implemented themselves actions from the SEAP.

• The council has assumed the whole responsibility to implement the measures from the SEAP.

• Stakeholders has not a very active role.

• The Council has not very much contact with other signatories before





Not still available






Not still available

Stakeholders




Not still available

171

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented in Table 82-

Table 85. Table 82 Baseline emissions inventory (BEI), analyse and interpretation of data

CO2 emissions




• No

• Yes

• Municipality Level and per capita.




equivalent?

• IPCC

• tonnes CO2

Energy consumption




• Yes

• Yes

• No.



• No exist.

Buildings


• No.

• Yes. Defined by the technical code of the building and the Regulation of Thermal Installations. National Regulations.

172

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Industry


• Yes.




• Yes.

• Yes




stakeholders’ groups have been listed ?





• No

• No

• No.




emission reduction

• Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures (tCO2/per capita)

1. Minimization energy demand for heating and

cooling as well as the promotion of RR.EE. 0.196 tCO2/capita

2. Conducting energy audits in all building. 3. Replacement oil/gas boilers to biomass in

Schools. 0.381 tCO2/capita



emission reduction


1. . Development programs aimed at the promotion housing rehabilitation. 2.38 tCO2/capita

2. Public information campaign for citizens on the importance of energy save. 2.65 tCO2/capita


173

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


emission reduction


1. Public information campaigns for service and tertiary companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures. 0.016 tCO2/capita

Transport



1. Integration of bicycles lines in roads. 0.011 tCO2/capita

2. Platform of shared cars for citizens who travel in urban displacements. 0.015 tCO2/capita

3. Dissuasive parking outside of the city. 0.014 tCO2/capita

4. Tax reduction for electric vehicles. 5. Free parking for electric vehicles in the city

centre. 6. Available free recharge point for electric

vehicles from the City Council.

Public lighting


emission reduction


1. Replacement of obsolete exterior lightning (Hg,

Na) by Led lightning. 0.003 tCO2/capita







Industry



1. Public information campaigns for industrial

companies on the importance of implement energy saving measures. 0.019 tCO2/capita




Possible sources of funding PUBLIC

174

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



1.- Local authority own resources. 2.- Regional funds (FEDER´s budget). 2.- National funds and programmes. 3.- EU funds and programmes. PRIVATE 1.- Development of agreements with companies and associations related to the energy sector, transport and renewable energy. Involve energy services companies to develop projects in buildings and public and private facilities.

Table 85 SEAP implementation- indicators



Number/surface area of buildings renovated, number of boilers replaced, surface area of solar thermal panels installed,

Public lighting


Number of traffic lights replaced by more energy efficiency ones, more efficient technology

Transport


Renewable fuels in public fleets Implementation of areas 30 km



Power capacity of PV installed

Local heat/cold production Number of new biomass boilers, new district heating facilities

175

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




Number of industries with ISO 50.001 and / or 14.001



Share of renewable production; power renewable capacity installed


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the other sectors?



Only the last 5 years of energy consumption have to be available for the customer.

Funding



Not yet. It will be follow every launch call for possibilities from financing.

Since the progress report for the city of Palencia is still not finalized, it was not possible to obtain data about the implementation of the measures proposed in the SEAP.

176

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

The 7 municipalitas of Ávila

The 7 municipalitas of Ávila (Las Navas del Marqués, Solosancho, Hoyo Casero, El Barco de Avila, Papatrigo,

El Barraco, San Juan del Olmo) are the pilot municipalities of the PentaHelix project for which the joint SECAP

will be developed.

Those municipalities involve a population from 104 to 5 187 inhabitants. Most of the municipalities are

surrounded by mountains.

The province is formed by 248 municipalities which capital is the city of Ávila. Its relief is marked by the

presence to the south of the Central System, which divides it into two zones: submeseta north, and Gredos

Mountains. They characterize by a rural economy where agriculture and livestock are frequent. Due to its

orography presents a climate variation from Mediterranean tempered with dry and temperate summer to

temper with dry and hot summer. EREN is giving technical support for development the SECAPs and APEA is

organizing the stakeholder task force group for Avila municipalities.

Information about current progress of SECAP development for the 7 municipalities of Ávila is presented in

Table 86 and Table 87.






• Yes there will be organize the stakeholders group with the support of APEA-Diptacion de Avila.






• Yes.

• No. But that have the support of APEA- Diptacion de Avila.& EREN.

• Yes.

• Yes.

177

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Stakeholders






• Propose measures.

• In the meeting or email, phone.

• Yes







• Not really. But they have the support from APEA-DIPUTACION DE AVILA.

• •They will signed the CoM. 2 of them are in the OPTE regional platform for optimise energy consumption in public facilities.

• Yes they are

• 4 (Between 1 to 5).







• Not alone. But the support of EREN, APEA-DIPUTACION DE AVILA and an external expert in emission inventory.

• •Yes, the local administration established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy and climate future of the municipality

• Yes

• Yes, the DIPUTACION DE AVILA will do.

• Yes, the DIPUTACION DE AVILA will do.

Stakeholders




• Did stakeholders participate in the definition of the vision for a sustainable

• The 5 pillars.

• Preparing the energy planning

• With meetings or by email, phone.

• No. by the moment but they will.


• •Phone, emails, working meetings.


178

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

energy (and climate) future of the municipality?





• No, because most of the political authorities are already convenced.

General goals




The goal is not yet determined

Additional remarks The 7 municipalities of Avila recently started the process

179

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Jekabpils

Jekabpilsis the pilot municipality of the PentaHelix project, for which the individual SEAP will be revised to the SECAP. With 26 468 inhabitants in year 2009 Jekabpils was eight biggest city in Latvia. City is located in south-east of Latvia. The area of municipality is 2 553.5 ha, from whom 448.7 ha - waters, 181,2 ha - forests. The Daugava River runs through the town, and the ancient valley, branches, and islands of the river are

considered picturesque. The two historical parts of Jekabpils — Krustpils and the older part of Jekabpils —

are connected by the bridge across the Daugava River.

Information about previous experience with SEAP development for Jekabpilsis is presented in Table 88-

Table 91 for all four phases of the SEAP development





• Yes, the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions to the local administration to start the process, allocate sufficient human resources and make sure adequate administrative structures are in place.

• Yes, the municipality council provide the necessary preconditions for stakeholders’ participation.






Jekabpils city municipality's decision to introduce a certified energy management system in accordance with the ISO 50001: 2011 standard "Energy management systems. Requirements and instructions for use "(adapted to the status of the Latvian national standard as LVS EN ISO 50001: 2012) is a logical further development step to ensure continuous improvement of energy consumption and management, availability of necessary information and resources, promotion of energy efficient services and products, energy efficient design , efficient building and equipment operation, reduce energy costs in the municipality, create a safe and attractive environment for investment, and ensure the compliance of the local government with the requirements of the regulatory enactments. With the introduction of the Energy Management System, the top management undertakes to implement a policy that will: 1. providing the necessary information and

180

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

resources for achieving the objectives of the proposed energy targets and energy target; 2. Compliance with regulatory enactments and other external requirements applicable to municipal energy use, energy consumption and energy efficiency are ensured; 3. the communicative importance of the energy management system in the municipality; 4. Determination of energy management objectives and energy indicators; 5. Ensuring the compliance of the power tool indicators with the needs of the municipality, as well as measurement and reporting of the results at specified intervals; 6. Supports the purchase of energy-efficient products and services, as well as the necessary design for improvement of power tools; 7. take into account improvements to the power tool.

Stakeholders





• Stakeholders are municipal corporations, producers, etc. which consume a significant amount of energy.

• So far, stakeholders are not involved in SEAP planning, but they plan different measures in their sector that affect the overall plan of the municipality.







Jekabpils has set targets for energy efficiency since 1995 (the Mire Pact baseline) by 2020, "to reduce CO2 emissions by at least 20% by 2020, thereby increasing energy efficiency by 20% and increasing energy use by 20% from renewable energy resources (20/20/20) "and has therefore implemented energy efficiency measures from 2009 onwards, paying particular attention to energy consumption in municipal real estate, mainly in the field of heat energy, by performing reconstruction and insulation projects for buildings, improving ventilation, heating and conditioning systems, as well as improving energy efficiency in public lighting.

181

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

It was calculated that 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in baseline year in Jekabpils municipality. Trying to reach goal of Covenant of Mayors, at least 13 315 tones of CO2 should be emitted less.

Long – term vision of Jekabpils city municipality Main challenges in achieving goals of Covenant of Mayors in Jekabpils municipality: (a) Renovation of residential buildings (b) Building new biomass CHP plant (c) Promoting of RES usage for space heating and hot water preparation. (d) Reduction of usage of transport fuel There are real ambitions for energy consumption minimization.







• Jekabpils city municipality established the objectives in line with the vision that will shape the sustainable energy (and climate) future and after that defined the the measures in line with the vision.

• At the start only major energy consumers and municipal corporations were involved.

Stakeholders






• Major energy consumers and municipal corporations are participating in the planning phase.

• Their role is to provide how many energy are consumed.

182

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu




General goals



• On the 18th of March, 2009 mayor of Jekabpils municipality, Leonīds Salcevičs, signed Covenant of Mayors. From that day Jekabpils municipality committed to reduce CO2 emissions, until year 2020, at least by 20 % comparing to baseline (1995) year.

• It was calculated that 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in baseline year in Jekabpils municipality. Trying to reach goal of Covenant of Mayors, at least 13 315 tones of CO2 should be emitted less.

• Year 2030 target - 30%.








• Jekabpils city municipality provides long-term support due to management system.




183

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



Stakeholders









• Yes, municipal council is asking to be informed regularly about the advancement of the plan – energy monitoring is carried out every year within the municipality, but to the general energy sector at least every 5 years.






-

Stakeholders


• Stakeholders are providing the necessary inputs data – the necessary information about their sector.

184

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu



• Stakeholders are participating a little in plan updating.

Information about the SEAP which will be revised are presented inTable 92-Table 95.


CO2 emissions




• Yes, breakdown of CO2 emissions is presented by energy carrier.

• As a basis for calculation of volume of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions all kinds of energy consumption in all the territory of Jekabpils city of all the year, irrespective of the place where this energy is produced. CO2 emissions are calculated separately for electricity consumption, consumption of heat energy in district heating system, consumption of fuel for transport and final energy consumption in households, industry, state and municipal enterprises and in service sector.




equivalent?

From the group of gasses creating greenhouse effect only CO2 emissions are calculated. In calculation of emissions the “standard” methodology has been used and parameters from the guidelines elaborated by IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (tonnes CO2).

Energy consumption




• Information about the total heat consumption in the district heating system in Jekabpils and per different consumer groups was received from the main heat supply operator. As basis for electricity consumption were taken data from joint stock company ”Latvenergo”. To estimate the structure of energy end consumption in Jekabpils the information received from the municipality was used (type of buildings and structure of property).

• For the calculation of consumption of the primary energy resources the data provided

185

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

by LR Central Bureau of Statistics were used. In those data an information has been compiled about total amount of gas, timber, coal, mazut, petrol, and diesel used in Jekabpils city. LR Central Bureau of Statistics provided data on the consumption of the primary energy resources in boiler houses as well as in cogeneration stations.

• By use of primary energy resources the consumed energy for heat supply and transport was calculated, using conversion factors from mass to energy in units (IPCC 2006).Thus the total consumed volume of energy was calculated. Distribution in separate user groups was done basing on the information provided by the municipality on the total structure of property in Jekabpils city, volume, type of use and ownership. From this equitation the procentual equitation was drawn which was used in the further calculations.

• For estimation of energy end consumption in the household sector the data were used on structure of energy consumption, number of consumers and characteristics of households from the LR Central Bureau of Statistics “Consumption of energy resources in households” ( in years 1996, 2001 and 2005). In these data there is separately shown information on energy consumption structure in Jekabpils households. Selection for the survey is made as stratified incidental selection of one or two-level households.



• Yes

Buildings


• No - so delicately it's not looked.

186

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


Industry


• Yes




• This sector has been analyzed and included in the inventory.




stakeholders’ groups have been listed?





• In this moment, main stakeholders’ groups are not identified in the SE(C)AP.




emission reduction

------



emission reduction (Potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures

• By renovating 50 % of residential buildings, that are connected to district heating until year 2020, it would be possible to reduce heat energy consumption by 40-45 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 880 tones.



emission reduction


------

187

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Transport



• By promoting efficient driving, travel by foot and bicycle (also laying new bicycle and foot ways), promoting “car pooling”, public transport etc. it would be possible to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions at least by 5 %.

• These measures would reduce CO2 emissions by 1 000 tones.

Public lighting


emission reduction


• By changing old mercury lamps to sodium ones in public lighting sector it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions by 70 tones.




• It is planned to build new biomass CHP in Jekabpils municipality in 2011. In this case it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions up to 3 624 tones (electricity and heat).




• By renovating district heating network, replacing old pipes to new, till year 2020 it would be possible to reduce heating losses from 26,1 % to 10 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 585 tones.

Industry


emission reduction


------




------




Foreseen financing sources for the implementation of SE(C)AP:

o local authority’s own resources o national funds and programmes o EU Funds and programmes

188

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• The highest share in financing proposed measures are from EU Funds and programmes.




Number/surface area of buildings insulated

Public lighting


Number of street lights replaced by LED/or other, energy reduction

Transport


Number of cars, mileage, number of charging points



Capacity installed, energy reduction



Energy reduction, installed power


• Which indicators are being used to monitor SE(C)AP implementation in the industry? (e.g. number of boilers replaced, number


189

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

of lamps replaced, renewable power installed)






------



For municipality (transport, heat, electricity, public transport, street lighting) - once a month. Local heat production, Transport, Local electricity production, ect. - every 5 years.

Funding



No, there are not enough financial means for the actions











• Municipal buildings equipment facilities (70% completed, 0% new, 5% ongoing, 0% postponed, 5% not started)

• Local heat/ cold production (50% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing,0 % postponed, 0% not started)

• Transport (0% completed, 0% new,0 % ongoing, 0% postponed, 0% not started)

• Public lighting (10% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed, 90% not started)

• Residential buildings (5% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing,0 % postponed, 0% not started)

• Tertiary buildings equipment facilities (0% completed, 0% new, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed, 0% not started)

190

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu


• Industry (0% completed, 0% not started, 0% ongoing, 0% postponed)





• In developing the Jēkabpils City Sustainable Energy Action Plan, it was calculated that in 1995 - in the base year in the city of Jekabpils, the amount of CO2 emissions was 66 573.97 tons. In order to achieve the objectives of the Covenant of Mayors, the amount of CO2 emissions should be reduced by at least 13 315 tonnes.

• In 2008, CO2 emissions amounted to 44 178.98 tonnes, which is 33.64% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).

• In 2013, CO2 emissions amounted to 32 317.05 tonnes, which is 51.46% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).


• Municipal

• Tertiary

• Residential

• Public lighting

• Transport


• Industry

• Other

Latvenergo AS – the leading producer of electricity and thermal energy in Latvia, supplies electricity to Jekabpils municipality. 33 477 MWh of electrical energy were consumed in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year. Therefore 3 649 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted. 25 105 MWh of electricity were consumed in Jekabpils municipality in year 2008. As a result 2 736 tones of CO2 were emitted. Due to decrement of electricity consumption, 913 tones of CO2 were emitted less in year 2008 than in baseline year. There is a potential of electricity saving in public lighting sector. By changing old mercury lamps to sodium ones it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions by 70 tones. Most heat energy in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year was consumed in residential buildings sector. Therefore, most emissions were emitted in this sector. 19 111 tones of CO2 were emitted in residential buildings sector. In industry sector – 13 363 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in year 1995. 12 568 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in tertiary buildings sector in baseline year. The least emissions were emitted in municipal buildings

191

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

sector – 7 139 tones. Overall 52 183 tones were emitted in heating sector in baseline year. During last years situation changed significantly. Due to replacement of fossil fuel to biofuel, emissions in heating sector reduced by three times. 12 118 tones of CO2 were emitted in residential buildings sector in year 2008. As it was in baseline year industry sector was in the second place by emitted emissions in year 2008 – 2 187 tones. Municipal buildings in year 2008 emitted 1 823 tones of CO2 emissions. The least emissions were emitted in tertiary buildings sector – 1 817 tones were emitted. Overall 17 946 tones were emitted in heating sector in year 2008. 30 837 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in district heating sector in baseline year. It came from heat energy production using natural gas, heating oil, coal, peat and wood. After reconstruction of boiler houses (district heating sector) over last years usage of RES increased, meanwhile CO2 emissions decreased significant. After reconstruction of boiler houses and replacement of fuel only 5 857 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in district heating sector in year 2008. Over last thirteen years CO2 emissions in district heating sector reduced by 81 %! During district heating network renovation losses were reduced from 47 % (in year 1995) to 26,1 % (in year 2009). 14 493 tones of CO2 were emitted in year 1995 from losses in heating network. After improvements made (replacement of fuel and renovation of heating network) only 1 528 tones were emitted in year 2008. CO2 emissions from district heating network losses reduced by 90 %! Potential of CO2 reduction: By renovating district heating network, replacing old pipes to new, till year 2020 it would be possible to reduce heating losses from 26,1 % to 10 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 585 tones. By renovating half of residential buildings, that are connected to district heating (~70 buildings) until year 2020, it would be possible to reduce energy consumption by 40-45 % and reduce CO2 emissions by 880 tones. It was planned to build new biomass CHP in Jekabpils municipality in 2011. Planned capacity for the new plant was 1,4 MW electricity and 6,715 MW

192

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

heat. Planned amount of heat energy produced is 26 800 MWh per year. In this case it would be possible to reduce CO2 emission up to 2 840 tones. It was calculated that 10 743 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted by different vehicles in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year. Major part of CO2 emissions came from private vehicles – 8 811 tones. Public transport in year 1995 emitted 1 916 tones, municipal fleet only 16,19 tones of CO2 emissions. Number of vehicles in Jekabpils municipality from year 1995 until year 2008 increased almost twice, while CO2 emissions increased almost twice. It was calculated that 20 144 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted by different vehicles – 16 767 tones came from private vehicles and 3 377 tones came from public transport. Overall CO2 emissions (in period 1995 – 2008) in transport sector increased by 9 401 tones. By promoting efficient driving, travel by foot and bicycle (also laying new bicycle and foot ways), promoting “car pooling”, public transport and etc. it would be possible to reduce energy consumption and CO2 emissions at least by 5 %. These measures would reduce CO2 emissions by 1 000 tones. CO2 emissions summary: It was calculated that in total 66 576 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in Jekabpils municipality in baseline year (1995). It was 2,32 tones of CO2 per capita in baseline year. Major part of CO2 emissions in Jekabpils municipality territory were emitted from heating sector – 52 184 tones. 10 743 tones of CO2 emission in municipality came from transport. The least part of CO2 emissions came from electricity used in Jekabpils municipality – only 3 649 tones. In total 40 827 tones of CO2 emissions were emitted in Jekabpils municipality in year 2008. 1,5 tones of CO2 per capita were calculated in year 2008. For today situation have been changed and major part of CO2 emissions in Jekabpils municipality territory is emitted in transport sector (not in heating sector as it was in year 1995). 20 144 tones were emitted in transport sector in year 2008. 17 946 tones of CO2 emission in municipality came from heating sector. The least part of CO2 emissions (as it was also in baseline year), came from electricity sector in Jekabpils municipality – 2 736 tones.

193

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

The main goal for all cities of “Covenant of Mayors” till year 2020 is to reach 20 % reduction of CO2 emissions comparing with baseline year. As it was mentioned before 66 576 tones of CO2 were emitted in baseline year. In order to achieve goal of “Covenant of Mayors” municipality should reduce emissions by 13 315 tones until year 2020. However, until year 2008 CO2 emission in Jekabpils municipality were reduced by25 749 tones (more than 36 %). It is important to keep (or to rise) this level until 2020. Nevertheless, Jekabpils municipality still has a potential of CO2 reduction. Using all measures mentioned above it would be possible to reduce CO2 emissions additionally by 6 159 tones. However, it is necessary to continue sustainable development in Jekabpils municipality. In developing the Jēkabpils City Sustainable Energy Action Plan, it was calculated that in 1995 - in the base year in the city of Jekabpils, the amount of CO2 emissions was 66 573.97 tons. In order to achieve the objectives of the Covenant of Mayors, the amount of CO2 emissions should be reduced by at least 13 315 tonnes. In 2008, CO2 emissions amounted to 44 178.98 tonnes, which is 33.64% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995). In 2013, CO2 emissions amounted to 32 317.05 tonnes, which is 51.46% less CO2 emissions than the base year (1995).


• Electricity

• Heat/cold

• Fossil fuels

• Renewables

Electricity Latvenergo AS is the leading producer of electricity and thermal energy in Latvia. Latvenergo supplies electricity to Jekabpils municipality. In year 1995 62 % of electrical energy consumed in Latvia was produced locally (47 % form RES, 15 % from fossil fuel) and 38 % was imported. Electricity network of Jekabpils municipality was and still is integrated in the overall electricity supply system of Latvia. Electrical energy consumers in Jekabpils municipality in year 1995:

• Municipal buildings – 3 225.5 MWh/year

• Tertiary buildings – 3 216 MWh/year

• Residential buildings – 21 643 MWh/year

• Public lighting – 1 522 MWh/year

194

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

• Industry – 3 870.5 MWh/year Total – 33 455 MWh/year

In total 25 106 MWh of electricity were consumed in year 2008 in Jekabpils municipality. Regarding to year 1995 electricity consumption in Jekabpils municipality in 2008 decreased by 8 372 MWh (by 25 %). Reduction of electricity consumption can be linked to decrement of population in Jekabpils municipality (decrement of 7 % over last years) and usage of more efficient appliances Heating The current centralized heat supply system in Jekabpils has been created during the 7th and 8th decade of the past century. Since the beginning of the 10th decade when the heating supply was handed over to local government, the system has not been renovated. "Jekabpils siltums" Ltd has inherited a heat supply system, which still has to be evaluated as technically incomplete and inadequate for the current economic situation despite relatively large previous investments. However, during last fifteen years situation in heating sector, due to renovation of heating network and reconstruction of boiler houses, have improved. Heat consumption (district heating) in Jekabpils municipality in 1995 was:

• Residential buildings – 15 201.57 MWh/year

• Public buildings – 16 555,52 MWh/year

• Municipal buildings – 34 277,06 MWh/year

• Industry – 9 131,29 MWh/year Total – 75 165.44 MWh/year

In year 1995 most usable fuel in district heating sector was heating oil (62,8 %) It was used in main three boiler houses. Natural gas (15,4 %), coal (1,7 %) and peat (0,6 %) were also used in heat production. Firewood was the only one renewable energy source used in district heating sector (19,5 %). Due to reconstruction of boiler houses and renovation of district heating network, energy production in Jekabpils municipality decreased from

195

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

138 116.5 MWh in year 1995 to 74 030 MWh in year 2008 i.e. by 46 % However, local heat energy production (in decentralized buildings) increased during last 13 years. In year 1995 decentralized buildings consumed 120 408 MWh of heat energy. In year 2008 decentralized buildings used 138 036 MWh of heat energy. Energy consumption in decentralized buildings increased over 14 % during last years.








In year 1999 timber company Ltd. “Breku studenti” started to produce heat energy and supply it to local neighborhood. Two boilers, each of 1 MW capacity, for heat production use sawdust and wood chips. “Breku studenti” supply heat energy to seven multi-storey buildings and one mall. In year 2009 “Breku studenti” produced 4 703,97 MWh of heat energy. Another timber company in Jekabpils municipality Ltd. “Osukalns” heat energy production started in year 2005. “Osukalns” boiler house capacity is 5.67 MW – wood is being used for heat production. “Osukalns” sell produced energy to “Jekabpils heat” company – 10 309.1 MWh of heat energy were sold in year 2009.

196

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Conclusion This report presents the baseline assessment made for each project partner country, as well as the results

of the detailed and thorough analysis conducted for the pilot municipalities. For those pilot municipalities,

nine SECAPs will be developed by implementing the PentaHelix methodology. As can be seen from the

baseline assessment, there are significant differences in the current practice of SE(C)AP development

between the project partner countries. Those differences are most evident at the example of Norway. Even

though almost all Norwegian municipalities (95.6%) have developed energy and climate plans, only eight

action plans have been submitted to the CoM. There is also a great difference in the content of SE(C)APs.

Unlike plans developed by other partner countries, Norwegian plans do not contain measures for CO2

emission reduction. Instead of that, the action plans propose the energy-use reduction measures. As the

result, those plans do not present the potential of CO2 reduction from the proposed measures.

In Belgium, many municipalities form option 2 joint SE(C)APs. This implies that there is the mutual goal of

reaching CO2 reduction within the group, while one baseline emission inventory and one action plan are

being developed. However, there are differences in the way of working between the regions, since in Belgium

the support concerning CoM is appointed on the regional level.

Unlike Belgium, Croatia does not have the practice of developing joint SE(C)APs. The analysed Croatian SEAPs

show that the general level of data of those SEAPs is high. However, it can be also concluded that most of

the proposed measures for CO2 reduction are repeating in those SEAPs.

Similar like in Croatia, in Spain the majority of the municipalities develop their individual action plans. Spain

has a great number of CoM signatures (1 815) and submitted SE(C)APs (1 512). The most significant share of

the submitted action plans (around 77%) make those which are developed for the municipalities smaller than

10 000 inhabitants.

Implementation of the measures proposed in Latvian SE(C)APs is enhanced with the introduction of a

certified energy management systems in accordance with the ISO 50001. In Latvia, local heat production has

the highest share of the implemented measures. Implementation of those measures resulted with high CO2

reduction.

Majority of the pilot municipalities have previous experience with SE(C)AP development and in the scope of

the project their action plan will be revised. In their previous experiences stakeholders were (in most of the

cases) not actively involved in the development of the plan. Although in most of the cases the main

stakeholders' groups were identified, the strategy for their involvement is not presented in the action plans.

197

www.pentahelix.eu

@pentahelix_eu

Sources

[1] Belgium-Official information and service, “Federal Public Services and Public Planning Services (FPS and PPS) | Belgium.be.” [Online]. Available: https://www.belgium.be/en/about_belgium/government/federal_authorities/federal_and_planning_public_services. [Accessed: 29-Dec-2018].

[2] “Covenant of Mayors - Action Plans.” [Online]. Available: http://www.covenantofmayors.eu/actions/sustainable-energy-action-plans_en.html. [Accessed: 27-Jun-2017].

[3] Eurostat, “File:Table 1-Share of renewables in gross inland energy consumption 2016.png - Statistics Explained.” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Table_1-Share_of_renewables_in_gross_inland_energy_consumption_2016.png. [Accessed: 21-May-2018].

[4] Eurostat, “File:Table 2-Share of energy from renewable sources in gross final consumption of energy 2004-2016.png - Statistics Explained.” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Table_2-Share_of_energy_from_renewable_sources_in_gross_final_consumption_of_energy_2004-2016.png. [Accessed: 21-May-2018].

[5] Worldometers, “Croatia Population (2018).” [Online]. Available: http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/croatia-population/. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2018].

[6] Study in Croatia, “About Croatia.” [Online]. Available: http://www.studyincroatia.hr/about-croatia/geography. [Accessed: 20-Dec-2018].

[7] The Croatian Bureau of Statistics, “Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Croatia,” 2015. [8] “Statistics Norway.” [Online]. Available: https://www.ssb.no/en. [9] “Norwegian Environment Agency.” [Online]. Available: http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/en/. [10] “Government.no,” Oct. 2016. [11] “Vista Analyse.” [Online]. Available: https://vista-analyse.no/en/. [12] “LIAA.” [Online]. Available: http://www.liaa.gov.lv/en. [13] “IDEA.” [Online]. Available: http://www.idae.es/. [14] “Belgium- Official information and services.” [Online]. Available:

https://www.belgium.be/en/Online_services/app_register. [15] “Cadastre.be - La meilleure source d’information pour vos projets immobiliers.” [Online]. Available:

https://www.cadastre.be/. [16] “DHMZ - Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service.” [Online]. Available:

http://meteo.hr/index_en.php.

Date post:	07-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

Deliverable 2 - PentaHelix · This project is funded by the European Commission under Horizon 2020...

Documents