BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for

Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

T3.3 Monitoring project success indicators

Deliverable D3.3.1 – Month 6

Version 0.1

Author(s)/Organisation(s)/Partner number:

Joep Crompvoets / KU Leuven / Partner number P1.2

Work Package / Task:

WP3 – Quality Plan / T3.3 – Monitoring of project success indicators

References:

Project Management Plan

Short Description:

This is an internal planning tool, aimed to monitor the organization of activities within the work package ensuring that the activities comply with planned results, milestones and budget consumption.

Keywords:

Monitoring, indicators, project success

The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute endorsement of the

contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which

may be made of the information contained therein

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for

Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Revision History:

Revision Date Author(s) Status Description

V0.1 19.12.2017 Joep Crompvoets Draft Initial draft

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for

Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 3 of 16

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 4

2. Monitoring task performance ................................................................................................... 5

3. Monitoring status .................................................................................................................... 11

4. Risks ........................................................................................................................................ 12

5. Risk status .............................................................................................................................. 16

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 4 of 16

1. Introduction

This deliverable D3.3.2 is the Monitoring report after 6 months of BESTSDI project execution

making use of the result indicators as presented in Deliverable D3.1.1 Quality Assurance Plan.

The overall objective of work package 3 is to define and implement quality assurance measures,

which ensure that the project meets its goals in the given timeframe and that the results will have

the expected impact. The work package is organised into three tasks, as follows:

- Task 3.1 Development of Quality Plan

- Task 3.2 Evaluation of project progress and results

- Task 3.3 Monitoring of project success indicators

This report refers to the execution of Task 3.3 after 6 months of BESTSDI. The main objective of

task 3.3 Monitoring of project success indicators is to continuously monitor through internal 3-

monthly reporting schemes and the procedures specified in D3.1 the progress of the project. Each

six month the current status of impact monitoring will be published.

The monitoring results are used by the project management to see how the aims of the project are

being fulfilled. It is the responsibility of the project management to promptly respond to any

indication of risk or deviation from the project plan and to initiate corrective actions.

Figures published in the final reports are used to assess the overall impact of the project and will

indicate whether the overall project aims were met. The overall score at the end of the project

should be 100% for each indicator.

The Quality Assurance Plan document was prepared by Task group 3.1 introducing the followed

procedures as well as listing the relevant result indicators. The monitoring reports are prepared by

the Task group members based on 3-monthly reports provided by the work group leaders/deputy

leader and task group leaders/deputy leaders. Draft monitoring reports are internally reviewed by

the task group and submitted by the task group leader to the Project coordinator. Adopted

monitoring reports will after approval by the PMB become public documents.

This report is structured as follows: Section 2 briefly presents the performance of monitoring with

the scores; Section 3 briefly reflects the status of the scoring results; Section 4 briefly presents the

performance of the risk assessment, and Section 5 briefly presents the status of the risks.

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 5 of 16

2. Monitoring task performance

The followed procedures of the monitoring of the project success indicators are well introduced in

Deliverable 3.1-1 Quality Assurance Plan.

The monitoring is based om the scoring of Results Indicators. The aim of scoring the Results

Indicators is to support the objective of the Quality Assurance Plan to ensure that the project

results and outcomes are achieved. As such, they provide an indication of the project progress.

They are expressed as percentages of completion of each project result, to be measured on a

quarterly (3 months) basis. So, 100% means that the task has been fully accomplished.

Tables at the next pages present the scores of each accomplishment of each deliverable as part

of specific task. The tables clearly present the expected result type, Result due date, as well as

the percentages per 3 months. The tables group those tasks that are relevant for the execution of

each Work Package.

The result name** refers to those deliverables that are not accomplished on time and so need

attention for successful accomplishment.

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 6 of 16

Results indicators

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date

Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.1

UNIZG

FOG D1.1.1

Survey analysis **

Report M4 30 90

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.1

UNIZG

FOG D1.1.2 Repository** Repository M6 30 90

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.1

UNIZG

FOG D1.1.3 Task Report** Report M6 30 90

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.2 HBO D1.2.1 Survey** Report M4 30 90

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.2 HBO D1.2.2 Repository** Repository M6 30 90

WP1 UNSA

FCE

Task

1.2 HBO D1.2.3 Task Report** Report M6 0 90

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.3

KU LEUVEN

D1.3.1 Survey analysis Report M4 30 100

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.3

KU LEUVEN

D1.3.2 Task Report Report M6 0 100

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.4

KU LEUVEN

D1.4.1 Core curriculum in GI-N2K CDTool

Report M8 0 20

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.4

KU LEUVEN

D1.4.2 Task Report Report M12 0 0

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.5

UKIM D1.5.1 Adaptation specification report*

Report M10 0 0

* PQx = Project quarter number WP WP

Leader TG TG

Leader Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date

Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP2A UKIM Task 2.1

UNIZG FOG

D2.1.1 Project curricula

Report M18 0 0

WP2A UKIM Task 2.2

UNIZG FGE

D2.2.1 Project LLL courses

Repository

M20 0 0

WP2A UKIM Task 2.3

UNIZG FOG

D2.3.1 Status analsyis

Report M6 0 100

WP2A UKIM Task 2.3

UNIZG FOG

D2.3.2 Equipment specification

Guidelines M11 0 50

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 7 of 16

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date

Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP2A UKIM Task 2.3

UNIZG FOG

D2.3.3 Equipment procurement(13 procurements)

Documents /Delivered goods

M17 0 10

WP2A UKIM Task 2.4

UNIST D2.4.1

Summer school Split '17 Report M7 0 10

WP2A UKIM Task 2.4

UNIST D2.4.2

Summer school Split '18 Report M22 0 0

WP2A UKIM Task 2.5

UPZ D2.5.1 Tailored curricula for

each partner (15 tailored curricula)

Repository

M22 0 0

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.6

UNSA FAFS

D2.6.1 Addoption of new curricula, courses & parts of courses

Formal documents/ Reports

M36 0 0

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.7

PUT FGM

D2.7.1 Execution of study courses

Reports on execution

M30 (M36)

0 0

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.7

PUT FGM

D2.7.2 Execution of LLL courses

Reports on execution

M30 (M36)

0 0

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.8

KU LEUVEN

D2.8.1 Analysis reports on satisfaction

Report M31 0 0

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.9

HBO D2.9.1 Finalized of new

curricula, courses & parts of courses

Report M34 0 0

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type

Result due date

Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP3 HBO Task 3.1

UNIZG FOG

D3.1.1 Quality Assurance Plan

Document M11 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.1

UNIZG FOG

D3.1.2 Evaluation Plan

Document M11 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.2

HBO D3.2.1 Moodle platform for

reporting Website M12 0 0

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 8 of 16

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type

Result due date

Percentage of completion PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP3 HBO Task 3.2

HBO D3.2.2.1

Evaluation Year 1 Repository

M12 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.2

HBO D3.2.2.2

Evaluation Year 2 Repository

M24 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.2

HBO D3.2.2.3

Evaluation Year 3 Repository

M34 0 0

WP3 HBO Task

3.3

KU

LEUVEN

D3.3.3.1 Quality Assurance

Monitoring

Report**

Report M6 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.3

KU LEUVEN

D3.3.3.2 Quality Assurance Monitoring Report

Report M12 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.3

KU LEUVEN

D3.3.3.3 Quality Assurance Monitoring Report

Report M18 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.3

KU LEUVEN

D3.3.3.4 Quality Assurance Monitoring Report

Report M24 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.3

KU LEUVEN

D3.3.3.5 Quality Assurance Monitoring Report

Report M30 0 0

WP3 HBO Task 3.3

KU LEUVEN

D3.3.3.6 Final Quality Assurance Monitoring Report

Report M36 0 0

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date Percentage of completition PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.1

UNIZG FOG

D4.1.1 Communication plan developed

Document M12 0 10

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.1

UNIZG FOG

D4.1.2.1

Report & statistics Reports M16 0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.1

UNIZG FOG

D4.1.2.2

Report & statistics Reports M24 0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.1

UNIZG FOG

D4.1.2.3

Report & statistics Reports M36 0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.2

UNIZG FGE

D4.2.1 Execution LLL courses

Reports M36 0 0

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 9 of 16

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date Percentage of completition PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP4

UNS FTS

Task 4.3

UNIST

D4.3.1

Tools for disemination

Website Facebook Reesearhgate Linkendin Twiter

M1

100 100

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.3

UNIST D4.3.2

Material for disemination

Documents /Leaflets /Adverts

Entire project lifetime

0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.3

UNIST

D4.4 Plan for Dissemination and Exploitation of Results developed

Document Guidelines

M12 0 0

WP4

UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM

D4.5.1 Presentation of reports, articles, presentations on external events, ets.

Documents /Reports /Repository

M36 0 5

WP4

UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM

D4.5.2 Presentation of reports, articles, presentations on self organized events

Documents /Reports /Repository

M36 0 5

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM D4.5.3 Usage of other

tools of result presentation

Documents /Reports /Statistics

M36 0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM

D4.5.4 BESTSDI Info – internal e-newsletter (monthly)

Digital newsletter

M36 10 20

WP4

UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM

D4.5.5 BESTSDI e-Newsletter – external e-newsletter (quarterly)

Digital newsletter

M36 0 0

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 10 of 16

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date Percentage of completition PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UNS FTS

D4.5.6 Country regulation rules

Report M20 0 0

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM D4.5.7 Regulation of

project results usage

Agreement M36 0 0

WP WP Leader

TG TG Leader

Result ID

Result name Result type Result due date

Percentage of completition PQ1* PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ5 PQ6 PQ7 PQ8 PQ9 PQ10 PQ11 PQ12

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.1

UNIZG FOG

D5.1.1 Project bodies appointed

Document M1 100 100

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.1

UNIZG FOG

D5.1.2 Project Management Plan

Document M1/M11 10 10

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.1 TG5.2 Meeting minute

Document +M1 after meeting

10 20

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.2 Internal Project Progress Reports to PMB (semi-annualy)

Report Prior event

0 0

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.3 Project bodies minutes (PMB, PSC, AC)

Documents +M1 after meeting

0 0

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.4 Interim Progres Report

Document M18 0 0

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.5 Final Report Document M36 0 0

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

D5.2.6 Final Conference in Sarajevo

Report M36 0 0

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.3.

UNIZG FOG

D5.3.1 Periodic National Progress Report

Report Prior PMB meeting

0 0

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 11 of 16

3. Monitoring status

The following results/deliverables need attention as they are not accomplished on time:

- D1.1.1 Survey analysis – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 4

- D1.1.2 Repository – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 6

- D1.1.3 Task report – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 6

- D1.2.1 Survey – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 4

- D1.2.2 Repository – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 6

- D1.2.3 Task report – 90% accomplished; should have been accomplished in Month 6

- D3.3.3.1 Quality Assurance Monitoring report – 0% accomplished; should have

accomplished in Month 4

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 12 of 16

4. Risks

A risk register was set-up aiming at identifying the project risks and at supporting the implementation of a risk mitigation strategy. This risk register is well introduced in D3.1-1 Quality Assurance Plan As part of the regular quarterly evaluation of project monitoring, all Work package leaders and Task leaders are requested to participate in detecting and classifying risks, in particular for the package/task they are responsible for. All identified risks have to be assessed on a monthly basis. If new risks are identified by Work package leaders or Task group leaders, the risk register has to be updated. The risk register will be reviewed on Project Management Board meetings. This work is, and will be, done by classifying each risk according to a series of variables, assigning values to be selected from predefined lists, presented at the next pages. The tables presented briefly describe the potential risk(s) for each task, the risk manager, risk type (as defined in D3.1.1 Quality Assurance Plan), and risk status.

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 13 of 16

WP WP

Leader TG TG Leader

Risk

ID Risk description

Risk

opening

date

Risk manager

Risk type

Risk

status

Probability

of occurence

Expected

impact

CAPA(

s) ID(s) closed

CAPA(

s) ID(s) open

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.1 UNIZG FOG R1.1

Insufficient number of partners providing reports on current status or with low quality

16/10/17 UNIZG FOG Technical No

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.2 HBO R1.2 Insufficient number of existing learning resources

16/10/17 HBO Technical No

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.3 KU LEUVEN R1.3 Insufficient number of public and business entities participated in survey

16/10/17 KU LEUVEN Technical No

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.4 KU LEUVEN R1.4 Insufficient number of learning units in project curricula

16/03/17 KU LEUVEN Technical No

WP1 UNSA FCE

Task 1.5 UKIM R1.5 Insufficient Number of partner universities prepared adapted curriucla

16/03/18 UKIM Technical No

WP2A UKIM Task 2.1 UNIZG FOG R2.1 Insufficient number and low quality of courses in project curricula

16/03/17 UNIZG FOG Technical No

WP2A UKIM Task 2.2 UNIZG FGE R2.2 Insufficient number and low quality of LLL courses

16/09/17 UNIZG FGE Technical No

WP2A UKIM Task 2.3 UNIZG FOG R2.3 Equipment purchase & installation delayed or not happened

16/12/16 UNIZG FOG Technical No

WP2A UKIM Task 2.4 UNIST R2.4 Insufficient number of teachers trained

16/06/17 UNIST Technical No

WP2A UKIM Task 2.5 UPZ R2.5 Too low number of adapted curricula

16/03/18 UPZ Technical No

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.6 UNSA FAFS R2.6

Too low percentage of courses implemented at partner Univerties as compared to expectation

16/03/18 UNSA FAFS Technical No

WP2B

KU

LEUVEN

Task 2.7 PUT FGM R2.7 Too low number of student

being educated 16/03/18 PUT FGM Technical No

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.8 KU LEUVEN

R2.8-1 Too low percentage of course evaluation being submitted

16/10/18 KU LEUVEN Technical No

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.8 KU LEUVEN

R2.8-2 Too low degree of satisfaction in course evaluation

16/10/18 KU LEUVEN Technical No

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 14 of 16

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.9 HBO R2.9-1 Too many courses with updating needs

16/10/18 HBO Technical No

WP2B KU LEUVEN

Task 2.9 HBO R2.9-2 Too low percentage of updates according to needs

16/02/18 HBO Technical No

WP3 HBO Task 3.1 UNIZG FOG R3.1 Quality Assessment Plan not approved or repeatedly improved

16/09/17 UNIZG FOG Managemen

t No

WP3 HBO Task 3.2 HBO R3.2 Not all Quality evaluations are submitted & approved

16/10/16 HBO Managemen

t No

WP3 HBO Task 3.3 KU LEUVEN R3.3 Not all Project monitoring reports are approved

16/09/17 KU LEUVEN Managemen

t No

WP WP

Leader TG

TG

Leader

Risk

ID Risk description

Risk

opening

date

Risk

creator Risk type

Risk

status

Probability

of occurence

Expected

impact

CAPA(s) ID(s) closed

CAPA(s) ID(s) open

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.1

UNIZG FOG

R4.1 Communication Plan not approved or repeatedly improved

16/09/17 UNIZG FOG

Management No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.2

UNIZG FGE

R4.2-1 Insufficient number of LLL courses being held with satisfactory evaluation

16/07/18 UNIZG FGE

Technical No

WP4 UNS

FTS

Task

4.2

UNIZG

FGE R4.2-2

Insufficient number of attendees on LLL courses who completed the satisfactory

evaluation 16/10/18

UNIZG

FGE Technical No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.3

UNIST R4.3 Not all planned promotion materials are produced

16/10/16 UNIST Technical No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.4

UNS FTS

R4.4-1 Not all planned dissemination events are organized

16/09/17 UNS FTS Technical No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UNS FTS

R4.4-2 Too low number of participants at own dissemination events

16/09/17 UNS FTS Technical No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.4

UNS FTS

R4.4-3 Too low number of presentations at external events

16/10/16 UNS FTS Technical No

WP4 UNS FTS

Task 4.5

UKIM R4.5 Not all partners signed the consortium agreement

16/10/18 UKIM Contractual No

WP WP

Leader TG

TG

Leader

Risk

ID

Risk description

Risk

opening

date

Risk

creator Risk type

Risk

status

Probability

of occurence

Expected

impact

CAPA(s) ID(s)

closed

CAPA(s) ID(s)

open

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.1

UNIZG FOG

R5.1 No Project Management plan 16/10/16

16/11/17

UNIZG FOG

Management No

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

R5.2 Too low number of event Minutes submitted

16/10/16 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

R5.21 No frequent submissions of Project Progress reports

16/10/16 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

BESTSDI – Western Balkans Academic Education Evolution and Professional’s Sustainable Training for Spatial Data Infrastructures

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 15 of 16

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2.

UNIZG FOG

R5.22 No frequent submissions of project bodies minutes

16/10/16 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

R5.23 No Interim Progress Report submissions 16/01/18 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

R5.1-4 No Final Report submission 16/05/19 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

WP5 UNIZG FOG

Task 5.2

UNIZG FOG

R5.2-5 No Final Conference in Sarajevo held 16/06/19 UNIZG FOG

Technical No

WP5 UNIZG

FOG

Task

5.3.

UNIZG

FOG R5.3

No Periodic National Progress Report

submissions 16/08/17

UNIZG

FOG Technical No

With the support of the Erasmus+ program: Higher Education – International Capacity Building

N° 574150-EPP-1-2016-1-HR-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

Page 16 of 16

5. Risk status

From the tables presented in Section 4, it appears that none of the predefined risks are under risk.