+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Delivering Shared Lives the Options

Delivering Shared Lives the Options

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: sharedlivesplus
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 12

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    1/12

    Delivering a Quality Shared Lives ServiceThe Options

    Sian Lockwood OBEChief Executive

    Community Catalysts

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    2/12

    Current options for delivering a Shared LivesService

    Funded and managed by the local authority (80%)

    Funded by the local authority and tendered (10%)

    Funded by the local authority and externalised to anorganisation established to run the Scheme (10%)

    Funded and managed by a health trust (a handful)

    Externalisation along with other local authority provision(under active consideration by a number of councils)

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    3/12

    Funded and managed by the local authority

    Most common Schemes vary hugely in size Benefits: Local authority retains control of the

    service; being part of the local authority (can)give status and credibility; staff security

    Challenges: Scheme does not always sit

    comfortably in the local authority structures;service is not always understood; Scheme andits staff can be marginalised

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    4/12

    Funded by the local authority and outsourced

    Some long established examples (Avalon; ASA Lincs;SWAPS)

    Schemes are better able to respond flexibly and quickly to

    new priorities (fewer bureaucratic hurdles) Schemes can diversify and seek funding from a range of

    sources for development

    Schemes work to contracts which specify outcome and

    output targets. Schemes have a better handle on their costs and are

    therefore better able to control costs.

    Theoretically......the devil is in the detail

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    5/12

    Tendered to another organisation

    A familiar local authority approach to outsourcing

    Can provide a smooth transition where the new host

    organisation has the right experience and goodinfrastructure

    Some positive examples of effective tendering

    (Staffordshire).

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    6/12

    Tendered to another organisation: Potentialproviders

    Specialist Shared Lives provider

    Organisation with some experience in delivering Shared

    Lives arrangements Established organisation (national or regional) with

    ambition but little experience

    Local organisation with good reputation but inexperienced

    Charity or profit making?

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    7/12

    Tendered to another organisation: Somechallenges

    Getting the tender design and selection process right

    For existing Schemes: Keeping the Shared Lives Carers

    and staff on board; TUPE Selecting the organisation: Possible conflict of interest

    with other activities; insufficient experience; danger ofservice marginalisation.

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    8/12

    Tendered to another organisation: Case Study

    Staffordshire

    Involvement of Shared Lives Carers and staff in

    tender design and selection process Limited market of organisations with necessary

    expertise

    Dilemma: Local organisation without necessary

    expertise v distant organisation with goodexperience

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    9/12

    Funded by the local authority and outsourced to anespecially established organisation

    Some highly successful examples (Shared Lives SouthWest; ASA Lincs; Avalon)

    New organisation adds to market diversity and is

    completely focused on Shared Lives Structure of the new organisation (not-for-profit or mutual)

    can enhance carer and staff engagement andcommitment

    Specialist Board can bring new skills that drivedevelopment

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    10/12

    Externalised to an especially establishedorganisation: A case study

    Avalon Part of NYCC

    Avalon established as not for profit company and then acharity

    Funding used to expand the service across the county Letting go not a department of the local authority;

    retaining surplus; investing in growth; diversification

    Increase in size and turnover driving down unit cost

    Outcome: After ten years: Turnover increased 20 fold(4m)

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    11/12

    Externalised to an especially establishedorganisation: Some challenges

    For already established Schemes: Keeping Shared LivesCarers and staff on board; TUPE

    Selecting the right structure

    Appointing the right CEO Contracts

    When (and how)to let go

    A level playing field?

    What happens if something goes wrong?

  • 8/3/2019 Delivering Shared Lives the Options

    12/12

    For further information

    Contact Sian Lockwood

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

Recommended