Date post: | 13-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truongcong |
View: | 244 times |
Download: | 5 times |
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
1
GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR) IWMP-8 (Ugalvan)
IWMP-2010-11
GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY
YEAR-2011-12
DETAIL PROJECT REPORT
GUNDARNI PROJECT (IWMP 18)
TALUKA: MAHUVA
PIA: DISTRICT WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT UNIT - BHAVNAGAR
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
2
INDEX
Sr. Particulars Page
1 Basic project information 09
2 Weightage of the project 10
3 Watershed information 12
4 Developmental programmes running in the project area 12
5 Previous Watershed programmes in the project area 12
6 PIA 17
7 Staff at PIA level 17
8 Land use pattern 19
9 Soil type and topography 20
10 Flood and drought condition 21
11.1 Soil Erosion 22
11.2 Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 22
11.3 Waterlogging Conditions 22
12 Climatic conditions: 24
13 Physiography and relief 24
14 Land ownership details 25
15 Agriculture 25
16 Irrigation 26
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
3
17 Crop details 27
18 Livestock 30
19 Drinking water 31
20 Details of Common Property Resources 32
21 Demographic information 33
22 Literacy rate 34
23 Migration details 35
24 Poverty 36
25 Village infrastructure 37
26 Facilities / HH assets 38
27 Income 39
28 Dependence on Forest/CPR 40
29 Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 40
30 Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects* 45
31 Detail of PRA Activities Condacted in the Project Area 46
32 Watershed Committee details 51
33 SHG detail 64
34 UG detail 67
35 Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 70
36 Details of activities of RegdeTreatment (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 72
37 Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.) 77
38 Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas 82
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
4
39 Activities related to livelihoods, Production and Micro Enterprices 84
40 Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 92
41 Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 93
42 Capacity Building Institution 93
43 Capacity Building plan 93
44 Information, education and Communication Activities 94
45 Budget at a glance 96
46 Village wise / Activity wise Budget 96
47 Village wise gap in Funds Requirment 97
48 Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects* 98
49 Environmental Benifites 101
50 Status of Drinking water 102
51 Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas 103
52 Area under horticulture 107
53 Details of livestock in the project areas 108
54 Employment to be supplement in Project area: 111
55 Details of seasonal migration from Project area 112
56 Per capita Income 113
57 Backward-Forward linkages 113
58 Project Strategy 114
59 Detail of monitoring system proposed for the project 124
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
5
Executive Summary
A Gundarani cluster (IWMP 18) has been Sanction under the Integrated Watershed Management Programme running under the new Common
Guideline 2008. It is located Nearer to Mahuva taluka; Bhavnagar district and Gujarat state. It consists of Sevan villages (Bambhaniya, Dhudhala no.2 ,
Lusadi, Gundarani , Haripara, Visavadar, Dundas, Mota pipalava, Kankot, Nana Pipalava, Bildi). The total Geographical area of the watershed project is
about 5721.60 ha, 5665.60 ha has to treat under Integrated Watershed management Programme..
District Watershed Development Unit, Bhavanagr has been selected as Project Implementation Agency (PIA) for Gundarni Cluster (IWMP 18) by State
level Nodal Agency (GSWMA – Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency for Gujarat state). PIA is responsible for the Successful Implementation of
the Watershed project. The WDT is an integral part of the PIA and will be set up by the PIA. WDT should have knowledge and experience in
agriculture, soil science, water management, social mobilization and institutional building.
DPR (Detail Project Report) is prepared after carrying out Baseline Survey, Technical survey and PRA Exercise (Participatory Rural appraisal) at
village level. As per NRAA‘s Tools for Base Line Survey and Performance Assessment of Watershed Development Projects in India; Baseline survey
was conducted at household level for Socio-economic information, Bio-physical survey was conducted at field level for natural resource information;
same as PRA for better people participation and need identification of local people. Then Work plan will be prepared and resolution of DPR in
Garmshabha will be done.
Scientific inputs like GPS, GIS are used for watershed planning. Soil and water conservation structures are selected by Ridge to valley approach.
Livelihood activities for the asset less persons have been planed as per local people’s competencies. Production system and micro enterprises have
been planned as per requirement of local people. For better implementation, we have designed a capacity building schedule for the different
stakeholders like User groups, Self Help Groups, Village watershed committee etc.
Soil and water conservation activities, livelihood plan, production system and enterprise development work will be implemented as per DPR during
the work phase. Expected outcome was pre-discussed and finalized DPR has been summed up using LFA (Logical framework of Analysis).
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
6
CHAPTER 1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
7
1. 1. Basic Project Information
Bhavnagar is located near the Gulf of Cambay in the Arabian Sea, a part of Saurashtra peninsula, in central part of Gujarat. Proximity of Bhavnagar
with commercial districts of Ahmedabad, Rajkot, Surendranagar, and Amreli has made the district an important industrial location. The district has 11
talukas, of which the major ones are Bhavnagar (District Headquarter), Shihor, Talaja, Mahuva, Botad, Palitana, Ghogha and Vallabhipur. Focus
industry sectors: Diamond cutting & polishing, cement & gypsum, inorganic salt-based and marine chemicals, shipbuilding, ship-repairs, oxygen,
foundry, re-rolling, ceramics, fabrication and food processing industries.
World’s largest ship breaking yard is at Alang in the district. Major tourist attractions in the district are velavadar National park-Blackbuck sanctuary,
Takhteshwar Temple, Gaurishanker Lake, Jain Temples of Palitana and TalajaBhavnagar district is a part of Eastern Hilly Region of the state and sub-
divided into two sub-micro regions namely, Mahi plain and Forested scrub zone, on the basis of topography, climate, soils and natural vegetation. It
lies between the parallels of latitude 22.17° and 23.20° and the meridians of Longitude 73.20° and 74.2°.
Industrial development in Bhavnagar district could be attributed to the presence of a large number of diamond cutting and polishing units, salt and
marine chemicals, plastics, ship building, and breaking industries. Bhavnagar stands second in diamond cutting & polishing industry after Surat in
India, with 6,000 units operating from the district and employing more than 3 lakh people. Bhavnagar is the largest producer of salt, with 34,500 tons
of salt being produced annually in the district. Bhavnagar manufactures FRP (Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic) boats and steel vessels at ship building
facility of Alcock Ashdown (Gujarat ) Ltd. At Alang, Bhavnagar houses the largest ship breaking yard in the world. Bhavnagar has about 150 units
manufacturing plastic monofilaments, and more than 400 units manufacturing plastic cloth, twine, ropes, films, and multifilament yarn. Some sections
of the society depend upon agriculture for their livelihood.
Mahuva is a small town on the outskirts of Bhavnagar District in the State of Gujarat, India. Mahuva is known for its mild weather and green, lush
surroundings, including many coconut tree plantations. It is located in the Saurashtra region, which is generally semi-arid, and thus is sometimes
called the Kashmir of Saurashtra.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
8
Mahuva includes a seaside beach, located near the historical Bhavani Temple. It is the residence of the popular Hindu preacher Morari Bapu. Mahuva
is also known for wooden toys, raw onions, groundnuts, and local Jamadar mango. Mahuva is home to a thrivingagribusiness industry, with an
emphasis on enterprises that dehydrate vegetables such as garlic and onions for use in processed foods.
The project IWMP 18 consists of eleven villages of the Mahuva Block which falls on the Bhavnagar district. The villages are named Bambhaniya,
Dhudhala no.2, Lusadi, Gundarani, Haripara, Visavadar, Dundas, Mota pipalava, Kankot, Nana Pipalava, Bildi. Basic details like the census code, Gram
panchayat, Block, Total area, area to be treated in this project and the project cost of the Project IWMP 18 are furnished in the Table no.1.
Table no.1: Basic project information
Sr No.
Name of the
project
Villages Gram Panchayats
Taluka District Area of
the project
Area proposed
to be treated
Total project
cost PIA
Name Census code
1
IWMP-18
Bambhaniya 140110104140000.00 Bambhaniya
Mahuva Bhavnagar
774.3 767.3 92.07
BHAVNAGAR
2 Dudhala No.2 140110104150000.00 Dudhala No.2 666.6 659.6 79.15
3 Lusadi 140110104390000.00 Lusadi 631.6 625.6 75.07
4 Gundarani 140110104400000.00 Gundarani 817.1 809.1 97.09
5 Haripara 140110104560000.00 Haripara 342 339 40.68
6 Visavadar 140110104570000.00 Visavadar 184.9 182.9 21.94
7 Dundas 140110104580000.00 Dundas 802.7 794.7 95.36
8 Mota Pipalva 140110104590000.00 Mota Pipalva 367.4 363.4 43.6
9 Kankot 140110104600000.00 Kankot 271.8 268.8 32.25
10 Nana Pipalva 140110104610000.00 Nana Pipalva 202.9 200.9 24.1
11 Bildi 140110104620000.00 Bildi 660.3 654.3 78.51
Total 5721.6 5665.6 679.87
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
9
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme
Watershed approach has emerged as a sustainable strategy to conserve the natural resources i.e. water, forest, soil in an integrated manner
particularly in the rain fed and drought areas. As per an estimate of Government of India, The integrated and holistic approach of watershed
development has been focused for sustainable development of the backward region.
Due to the geographical diversity, Bhavnagar needs Integrated Watershed Management Programme. (IWMP) Watershed Development Programme is
selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual Wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers,
ground water status, moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking Water situation in the area, Percentage of Degraded land, Productivity
potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/ treated, cluster approach for plain or for holly terrain. Based on
these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given in the table No. 2
Table no.2: Weightage of the project Project name
Type of project Weightage
Total IWMP 18
i ii iii iv v Vi vii viii Ix X xi Xii Xiii Others 5 3 5 3 3 0 15 5 10 10 10 15 0 84
Table No.2.1: Criteria and weightge for selection of watershed Sl. No
Criteria Maximum
score Ranges & scores
i Poverty index (% of poor to
population) 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5)
Below 20 % (2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages
(5)
Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum
wages (0)
iv % of small and marginal
farmers 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/
DPAP/ DDP Block 15
-66.7 & below (15) DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
10
vii Area under rain-fed
agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5)
Above 70 %
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully
covered (0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of
TGA (5)
x Productivity potential of the
land 15
Lands with low production & where productivity can be
significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)
Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be
enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)
Lands with high production & where productivity can be
marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)
xi Contiguity to another
watershed that has already been developed/ treated
10
Contiguous to previously treated watershed &
contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project
(10)
Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the
project but non contiguous to previously treated
watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to previously treated
watershed nor contiguity within the micro
watersheds in the project (0)
xii
Cluster approach in the plains (more than one
contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in
cluster (15) 4 to 6 micro watersheds in
cluster (10) 2 to 4 micro watersheds
in cluster (5)
xiii
Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous
micro-watersheds in the project)
15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in
cluster (15) 3 to 5 micro watersheds in
cluster (10) 2 to 3 micro watersheds
in cluster (5)
Total 150 150 90 41 2.5
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
11
Project type: Hilly/desert/Other Table no.3: Watershed information
Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be
treated Watershed code
Watershed regime/type/order
IWMP 18 6 5G2A7b1f, 5G2A7b1d, 5G2A6b2k, 5G2A6b2h,
5G2A6b2j, 5G2A6c2c micro watershed
1.3 Other developmental programmes running in the project area
Poverty in rural area has remained by and large, the main focal point of governments and development agencies. Sustainable rural development is the
most effective way to eliminate this curse. To improve the livelihood of rural people, governments have allocated much fund for the rural areas.
Constant efforts are being taken to ensure development of rural areas. So many state and central government’s projects and schemes are running in
the project area as given in table no 4.
Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area :
Sl no
Name of the programme/scheme
Sponsoring agency Objectives of the programme/scheme Year of
commencement
Villages covered
Estimated number of
beneficiaries 1 Sardar Avas Yogana Government of India Infrastructure 2001-02 11 68 2 MGNREGA Government of India Employment Generation 2009-10 11 1277 3 IAY GOG Development of Social Infrastructure 2001-02 11 95 4 TSC Government of India Improve the sanitary facilities in the rural area 2009-10 10 314 5 WASMO GOG Safe Drinking water 2008-09 2 Villager
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:
Sl no
Project name
Year start
ed
Name of villages
No. Of micro
watershed
Watershed codes
Area under
treatment
Funding source
Nodal agency
PIA Total cost
Expenditure incurred up
to start of 6IWMP
% financial completi
on
% physic
al completion
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
12
CHAPTER 2
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
13
Project Implementation Agency
The Project Implementation Agency (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA), the
State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIA is responsible for implementation of
watershed project. This PIA may include relevant line department, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Government, Government
Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of IWMP 18 Project is District watershed development
unit (DWDU), Bhavnagar.
2.2 Roles and Responsibilities of the PIA as per New Common Guideline - 2008
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) will provide necessary technical guidance to the Gram Panchayat for preparation of development plans for the
watershed through Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) exercise, undertake community organization and training for the village communities,
supervise watershed development activities, inspect and authenticate project accounts, encourage adoption of low cost technologies and build upon
indigenous technical knowledge, monitor and review the overall project implementation and set up institutional arrangements for post-project
operation and maintenance and further development of the assets created during the project period. PIA, after careful scrutiny, shall submit the Action
Plan for Watershed Development Project for approval of the DWDU and other arrangements. (As per Para - 38)
The PIA shall submit the periodical progress report to DWDU. The PIA shall also arrange physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken. It
will facilitate the mobilization of additional financial resources from other government programmes, such as NREGA, SGRY, National Horticulture
Mission, Tribal Welfare schemes, Artificial Ground Water Recharging, Greening India, etc. (As per Para - 39)
2.3 District Watershed Development Unit, Bhavnagar
2.3.1 The organization and its objectives
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Bhavnagar is a district level nodal agency to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed
projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff
comprising one Project Director (Deputation from Gujarat Forest Department); a Technical Expert (on contractual basis) and Multidisciplinary Team
(MDT) of civil Engineer, agriculture expert, and community mobilization expert, surveyor and computer operator. The remaining staff i.e. MIS
coordinator, system analyst and accountant will be recruited for administration work. The objective of the DWDU Bhavnagar are surveying, planning,
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
14
implementing, documenting, and promoting watershed development projects and related development activities in the district. Moreover, the DWDU
Bhavnagar will work as a PIA for some IWMP projects.
2.3.2 Programmes/project of DWDU Bhavnagar
At present Eighteenth IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Bhavnagar district. In Bhavnagar six project sanctioned each
year like 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12. Apart from IWMP projects, DWDU Bhavnagar is involved in Pre-Hariyali and Hariyali projects (DPAP) and
out of that all are still running in the district. The DWDU Bhavnagar is also monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge
of Groundwater through Dug well” in the district
2.4 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU Strength: (1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team
(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities and NGOs for capacity building and technical guidance
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar
(5) District level monitoring coordination & cooperation Committee
Weakness: (1) No permanent staff (2) No permanent office building
Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration and convergence of programme (2) Better financial provision under IWMP
(3) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities
(4) Online IT connectivity for managing data cell for better transparency
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
15
Threats:
(1) Rainfall being very scarce and unreliable in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact
(2) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning
(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people
(4) Low literacy rate in the project area
(5) Local level conflicts and politics
Table no. 6: PIA: Sl. No. Names of project Details of PIA
1 IWMP 18
(i) Type of organization Autonomous
(ii) Name of organization DWDU Bhavnagar (iii) Designation & Address PIA and Project Director, Gordiya complex, Bandar Road,mahuva
(iv) Telephone 02844-222301
(v) Fax 02844-222301
(vi) E-mail [email protected]
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level:
Sl no
Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly
remuneration
1 Mr. A.R. kshatriya 52 M Project Director & PIA Msc (Chem) 30 Year Project Implementation 61000
2 Mr. Jaswant Bandkar 33 M MDT Agri & PIA Nodal BRS 5 Year Co-ordination 18500
3 Mr. Yograjsinh Gohil 22 M WDT Engineer D.C.E. 2 years Engineering work 11000
4 Mr. Ashok V. Makwana 40 M WDT Agri. B.R.S. 10 Years Agri. Expert 13200
5 Mr. Mayur Vinjuda 26 M WDT CM B.R.S. 2 Years Community Mobilization 11000
6 Mr. Kiran A. Jani 24 M WDT DEO PGDCA 2 Years DEO 6000
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
16
CHAPTER 3
BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
17
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology 3.1.1 Land use pattern
By land use pattern we mean the distribution of land in accordance with its use or in the study of village land, we are concerned with surface
utilisation. The concept of land use is a key concept for understanding rural land use. It includes many broad categories and their sub-division and
level of management which may exist with certain defined types of land use.
The total geographical area of Project is 5665.60 ha out of which 5721.60 ha (81.05 % of the total area) is under agriculture use and the cultivated
lands of the village are very fertile and give better yield than the other lands. Most of the cultivable lands are used for double crops i.e. Kharif and Rabi.
Still 5609.50 ha (81.05% of the total area) is rainfed due to no assured irrigation facilities. There is 0.0 ha forest area. The total cultivable wasteland
and non-cultivable wasteland is 229.20 ha and 417.90 ha respectively.
Table no. 8: Land use pattern:
S. No. Names of villages Geographical Area of the
village
Forest
Area
Land under
agricultural use
Rainfed
area
Permanent
pastures
Wasteland
Cultivable Non-cultivable
1 Bambhaniya 774.30 0 683.00 683.00 - 81 10.3
2 Dudhala No.2 666.60 0 573.00 573.00 - 44.6 49.0
3 Lusadi 631.60 0 526.40 526.40 - 20.3 80.9
4 Gundarani 817.10 0 723.00 723.00 - 61 33.10
5 Haripara 342.00 0 292.50 292.50 - 40.9 8.6
6 Visavadar 184.90 0 138.70 138.70 - 13.8 32.5
7 Dundas 802.70 0 689.10 689.10 - 77.5 36.0
8 Mota Pipalva 367.40 0 294.00 294.00 - 56.4 17.0
9 Kankot 271.80 0 239.00 239.00 - 14 17.00
10 Nana Pipalva 202.90 0 169.00 169.00 - 26 79.00
11 Bildi 660.30 0 606.90 606.90 - 39.4 14.10
Total 5721.60 0 4934.60 4934.60 - 478.90 306.40
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
18
3.1.2 Soil and topography
A Gundarni watershed Programme comes under North Saurashtra agro climatic zone. The soil is mainly Shallow black Shallow Medium Black Soil is
soil composed of sand, silt, and clay in relatively even concentration (about 40-40-20% concentration respectively), considered ideal for gardening
and agricultural uses. Loam soils generally contain more nutrients and humus than sandy soils, have better infiltration and drainage than silty soils,
and are easier to till than clay soils. These vary in depth from shallow to deep. The typical soil derived from the Deccan trap is the regur or Shallow
Black, semi rockey and semi loamy soil. Manly black soil areas have a high degree of fertility.
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography:
S. No. Project
Name
Name of the Agro-climatic
zone covers project area b) Area in ha
Names of the
villages
Major soil types
Topography a) Type
b) Area in
ha
1
IWMP-18 North Saurashtra
683.00 Bambhaniya
Shallow
Medium
Black
683.00 Flat to Moderate slop
2 573.00 Dudhala No.2 573.00 Flat to Moderate slop
3 526.40 Lusadi 526.40 Flat to Moderate slop
4 723.00 Gundarani 723.00 Flat to Moderate slop
5 292.50 Haripara 292.50 Flat to Moderate slop
6 138.70 Visavadar 138.70 Flat to Moderate slop
7 689.10 Dundas 689.10 Flat to Moderate slop
8 294.00 Mota Pipalva 294.00 Flat to Moderate slop
9 239.00 Kankot 239.00 Flat to Moderate slop
10 169.00 Nana Pipalva 169.00 Flat to Moderate slop
11 606.90 Bildi 606.90 Flat to Moderate slop
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
19
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:
Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Bambhaniya Nil Once in 3 Year
2 Dudhala No.2 Nil Once in 3 Year
3 Lusadi Nil Once in 3 Year
4 Gundarani Nil Once in 3 Year
5 Haripara Nil Once in 3 Year
6 Visavadar Nil Once in 3 Year
7 Dundas Nil Once in 3 Year
8 Mota Pipalva Nil Once in 3 Year
9 Kankot Nil Once in 3 Year
10 Nana Pipalva Nil Once in 3 Year
11 Bildi Nil Once in 3 Year
3.2 Edaphic factor
An edaphic factor relating to the physical or chemical composition of the soil found in a particular area. For example, very alkaline soil may be an
edaphic factor limiting the variety of plants growing in a region. Edaphic factors that influence soil organisms are derived from the development of
soils and are both physical and biological (e.g. mineral and humus content, and pH).
3.2.1 Soil erosion
Erosion is the process of weathering and transport of solids (sediment, soil, rock and other particles) in the natural environment or their source and
deposits them elsewhere. It usually occurs due to transport by wind, water, or ice; by down-slope creep of soil and other material under the force of
gravity; or by living organisms, such as burrowing animals, in the case of bio erosion.
As per above mentioned Land use pattern (Table no 8), soil properties and topography (Table no 9) soil erosion is generally through water. And
geographically project area is almost flat so runoff of rain fall is main cause of erosion. There is no wind erosion. In the water erosion; splash erosion
impinges on 72 to 78 % of total project area by detachment and airborne movement of small soil particles caused by the impact of raindrops on soil.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
20
Rill erosion impinges on 12 to 18 % of the total area by the development of small, ephemeral concentrated flow paths, which function as both
sediment source and sediment delivery systems for erosion. This is typically found in channels of streams and rivers. Gully erosion impinges on 8 to
12 % of the total area; this is occurred when water flows in narrow channels during or immediately after heavy rains. There is no ravenous in the
project area. Tillage and cropping practices, as well a land management practices, directly affect the overall soil erosion problems on a farm.
11. Edaphic Factors Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion
Project name
Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year) Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/ year)
IWMP 18
Water erosion A Sheet 2199
278 5 to 10 B Rill 1120 C Gully 346 D Ravenous 0.00
Wind erosion 0.00 Total 3665 278
3.2.2 Soil Salinity The Saline soil has excessive concentration of natural soluble salts, mainly of chlorides, sulphates and carbonates of calcium, magnesium and sodium.
The total concentration of salts is estimated by way of electrical conductivity. If the electric conductivity (EC) of soil extract is more than 4 dS/m, they
are called "saline soils". They are also called “white alkali” soils. In arid regions, where evaporation exceeds the precipitation, the soluble salts
accumulate near the soil surface. Soil Salinization in the coastal area is due to the accumulation of salts from the inundated seawater. Irrigation water
contains a high concentration of soluble salts; particularly sodium salts which lead to salinity.
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)
IWMP-18 - 6 to 8 Inherent
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
21
Table no. 11.3: Waterlogging Conditions
Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons Bambhaniya - -
Dudhala No.2 - -
Lusadi - -
Gundarani - -
Haripara - -
Visavadar - -
Dundas - -
Mota Pipalva - -
Kankot - -
Nana Pipalva - -
Bildi - -
3.3 Rainfall vs Runoff
As 79.59 % project area lays under rainfed; so rainfall is major factor for crop productivity and also indirectly affected livelihood of the villager.
Irregularity in rainfall is major problem of farmers for success of better productivity even though fertile soil for crop. The rainfall is scanty which has
resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is about 804 mm (from past five year data).
As Topography of project area is hilly so runoff of rainfall water through 1st order stream (Naali) then 2nd order Stream (Nala) and 3rd order Stream
(Nadi).
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
22
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions :
Name of project
Year Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature (oc)
Summer Winter Max Min Max Min
IWMP-18
2006 682 42.18 29.25 24.32 17.32
2007 954 41.20 31.10 25.50 16.27
2008 544 41.35 25.60 25.65 20.62
2009 650 40.65 30.22 20.10 20.91
2010 895 40.27 26.70 21.19 17.51
Table no. 13: Physiography and relief
Project name Elevation (mt) Slope range (%) Major streams
I.W.M.P – 18 Gundarni 21 0 to 35% Ramtlla. Bhabhali,
Surajvadi, Grasvo
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
23
3.4 Land and Agriculture
Land resource is more important to the people whose livelihood depend on agriculture. As agriculture output purely depends on land resource. Thus,
lack of access to land increases incidence of poverty in rural areas. In rural areas, land ownership has a social value and serves as a security for credit,
natural hazards or life contingencies, and also adds to the social status. Shallow black soils are most important soil groups for agricultural production
that are found in the project area. These are considered good for cultivation of Cotton, Groundnut, Bajari in Kharif and Wheat, Onion in Rabi. The land
conservation measure such as earthen bund in the area some farm will conserve Land from soil erosion and Khet Talavli help for irrigation in Rabi
crop of Onion or wheat in the residual moisture.
Table no. 14: Land ownership details Sl no
Village Total owned land (HH) HHs giving land
on lease HHs taking
land on lease Gen OBC SC ST 1 Bambhaniya 60 300 00 00 0 0 2 Dudhala No.2 189 014 2 00 0 0 3 Lusadi 10 87 20 00 0 0 4 Gundarani 55 121 04 00 0 0 5 Haripara 63 007 00 00 0 0 6 Visavadar 09 50 01 00 0 0 7 Dundas 15 45 15 00 0 0 8 Mota Pipalva 00 90 00 00 0 0 9 Kankot 00 20 00 00 0 0
10 Nana Pipalva 00 125 00 00 0 0 11 Bildi 14 336 00 00 0 0
Total 415 1195 42 0 0 0
Table no. 15: Agriculture
Sl no
Village Net sown area
One time Two times Three times
1 Bambhaniya 679.00 65.00 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
24
2 Dudhala No.2 573.80 95.00 0
3 Lusadi 526.42 10.00 0
4 Gundarani 723.00 26.00 0
5 Haripara 292.00 22.50 0
6 Visavadar 138.00 4.00 0
7 Dundas 720.00 3.00 0
8 Mota Pipalva 323.78 2.00 0
9 Kankot 235.00 5.00 0
10 Nana Pipalva 165.00 3.00 0
11 Bildi 591.00 264.00 0
TOTAL 4967 499.50 0
Table no. 16: Irrigation
Sl no
Village Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well
Availability mnths
Net area Gross area Availability
months Net area Gross area
Availability months
Net area Gross area
1 Bambhaniya 2 30 30 0 0 0 4 35 35 2 Dudhala No.2 2 60 60 0 0 0 4 35 35 3 Lusadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 10 4 Gundarani 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 26 26 5 Haripara 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 22.50 22.50 6 Visavadar 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 7 Dundas 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 8 Mota Pipalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 9 Kankot 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 5
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
25
10 Nana Pipalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 11 Bildi 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 264 264
Total 04 90 90 0 0 0 0 409.50 409.50 Table no. 17: Crop details:
Sl no
Village Kharif (Monsoon)
Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Groundnut Crop 3 Bajari Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity
1 Bambhaniya 478 717000 1480 68 85000 1240 137 308250 2240
2 Dudhala No.2 401 601500 1490 57 71250 1230 115 258750 2250
3 Lusadi 368 552000 1510 53 66250 1235 105.4 237150 2230
4 Gundarani 506 759000 1480 72 90000 1250 145 326250 2245
5 Haripara 205 307500 1490 29 36250 1240 58.5 131625 2240
6 Visavadar 97 145500 1500 14 17500 1230 27.7 62325 2250
7 Dundas 482 723000 1480 69 86250 1240 138.1 310725 2255
8 Mota Pipalva 206 309000 1500 29 36250 1235 59 132750 2240
9 Kankot 167 250500 1490 24 30000 1245 48 108000 2235
10 Nana Pipalva 118 177000 1480 17 21250 1250 34 76500 2240
11 Bildi 425 637500 1475 61 76250 1240 120.9 272025 2250
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
26
Sl no
Village Rabi
Crop 1 Onion Crop 2 Wheat Crop 3 Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity Area Production Productivity
1 Bambhaniya 39 853125 21870 26 65000 2510 0 0 0
2 Dudhala No.2 57 1246875 21860 38 95000 2490 0 0 0
3 Lusadi 6 131250 21875 4 10000 2500 0 0 0
4 Gundarani 15.6 341250 21880 10.4 26000 2510 0 0 0
5 Haripara 13.5 295313 21870 9 22500 2490 0 0 0
6 Visavadar 2.4 52500 21865 1.6 4000 2510 0 0 0
7 Dundas 1.8 39375 21880 1.2 3000 2495 0 0 0
8 Mota Pipalva 1.2 26250 21870 0.8 2000 2510 0 0 0
9 Kankot 3 65625 21870 2 5000 2510 0 0 0
10 Nana Pipalva 1.8 39375 21885 1.2 3000 2505 0 0 0
11 Bildi 158.4 3465000 21875 105.6 264000 2485 0 0 0
3.5 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the project area
“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of land.
Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.” Data are made
available by the Baseline survey (for Villages and project area), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final
district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Panchmahal). The results indicate that project villages have poor productivity compared to India,
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
27
Gujarat and district. The Project area comes under middle Gujarat. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they
generally grow high value crops. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of project area.
Major limitations reduce crop productivity; there are number of factors which have time and again affected productivity.
i) Depletion of water table
Due to scanty and insufficient rainfall and continuous discharge from underground water resources, there is depletion of water table. This adds
to the cost of irrigation from tube wells.
ii) Irregularity of rainfall
This is a major problem. Even in good years, there is a gap between two spells of rainfall – sometimes exceeding one month or there is delayed
rainfall or missing last round of rains in September.
iii) Recurrent droughts
This happens at least thrice in a decade. Sometimes there are two recurring droughts. Many times, two-thirds of the state gets affected. During
the second spell, the entire agriculture fails, often pushing even a well-to-do farmer below poverty line.
iv) Increase in operation cost
The cost of farming is going up due to rise in labour cost, Fuel cost etc.
v) Inherent Soil Salinity
Soil salinity is one of the major constraints in development of agriculture.
vi) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So he sells to local traders
at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of transportation and roads. And second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
28
3.6 Livestock
In the project area total 1533 buffaloes, 960 cows, 1211 goats, and 2086 bullocks. Most of farmers having buffaloes and cows for overcome need of
milk and organic manure for farm; and Majority of Bharvad community depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Milk production is
comparative poor. Milching animal rearing is one of suitable alternative option for livelihood.
Table no. 18: Livestock
Sl no Village Buffalo Cow Total Milk
(Buffalo+Cow) Goat
Sheep Bullock Hen Others Total
No Milk No Milk No Milk
1 Bambhaniya 252 2268 175 1050 3318 165 118 122 42 22 55 833
2 Dudhala No.2 195 1755 110 660 2415 170 122 195 44 2200 65 2979
3 Lusadi 125 1125 76 456 1581 125 90 45 33 0 35 439
4 Gundarani 287 2583 105 630 3213 140 100 137 42 1800 85 2596
5 Haripara 41 369 49 294 663 25 18 20 8 0 25 168
6 Visavadar 28 252 18 108 360 0 0 15 16 0 25 102
7 Dundas 282 2538 210 1260 3798 232 167 220 66 0 70 1080
8 Mota Pipalva 66 594 56 336 930 135 97 69 12 10 45 393
9 Kankot 38 342 24 144 486 0 0 5 12 0 55 134
10 Nana Pipalva 43 387 22 132 519 45 32 12 8 0 44 174
11 Bildi 176 1584 115 690 2274 174 124 76 62 1200 95 1898
Total 1533 13797 960 5760 19557 1211 868 916 345 5232 599 10796
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
29
3.7 Quality of Drinking water
Drinking water availability is 10 to 12 months in the project area. Mainly sources of drinking water are well and hand pump. Drinking water quality is
Medium Brackish. As TDS is between 500 to 30000 milli grame/liter. Ph is approximately near to 7 which are showing neutral quality. “Brackish water
is water that has more salinity than fresh water, but not as much as seawater. It may result from mixing of seawater with fresh water, as in estuaries,
or it may occur in brackish fossil aquifers. The word comes from the Middle Dutch root ""brak,"" meaning ""salten"" or ""salty"". Technically, brackish
water contains between 0.5 and 30 grams of salt per litre more often expressed as 0.5 to 30 parts per thousand (ppt or %).
Table no. 19: Drinking water Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality
1 Bambhaniya 22 Open wells, Narmda water Line 10 to 12 Breckis
2 Dudhala No.2 25 Open wells, Vav, Bore well, Narmda water Line 10 to 12 Breckis
3 Lusadi 21 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump 10 to 12 Breckis
4 Gundarani 22 Open wells, Bore well, Narmda water Line,
Hand pump 10 to 12 Breckis
5 Haripara 21 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump Nal 10 to 12 Breckis
6 Visavadar 20 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump, Nal 10 to 12 Breckis
7 Dundas 22 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump Nal, Narmda
water Line 10 to 12 Breckis
8 Mota Pipalva 20 Open wells, Bore well, Narmda water Line 10 to 12 Breckis
9 Kankot 23 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump, Narmda
water Line 10 to 12 Breckis
10 Nana Pipalva 21 Open wells, Bore well, Hand Pump 11 Breckis
11 Bildi 22 Open wells, Bore well, Hand pump, Narmda
water Line 12
Breckis
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
30
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
S.
No.
Names of
project
CPR
Particulars
Total Area (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt. persons
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
PRI
Any othar
(Pl.
Specify)
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
PRI Any othar
(Pl. Specify)
1 IWMP 18
Wasteland/ degraded land 0 785.30 0 0 785.30 0
Pastures 0 00 0 0 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 0 0 0 0 0
Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0
Othars (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
31
3.8 Socio-Economic Profile 3.8.1 Demographic status Total population of Project area is 15248 out of it 7747 males and 7501 females. Sex ratio is 968 in project area. Total household of project area is
2664 nos. It is common knowledge that migration of people is moving out of their villages and reaching nearby or remote destinations in search of
gainful work Migration is a typical phenomenon. The phenomenon of out – migration from villages is commonly observed though available data and
information are too scanty and sketch to present in this report. Development of agriculture and animal husbandry is so backward as to compel
farmers – even small and marginal farmers or even agricultural laborers in times failure of monsoon and the resultant drought conditions to leave
their villages and migrate to out side places in search of jobs. There are hardly any employment opportunities in farm, non – farm and service sectors
to any considerable extend in the district both during agricultural season as well as off-season. There are also a fair number of persons who migrate
into this district in search of jobs and labour (skilled or unskilled) work. People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like
Rajkot, Junagadh and Jamnagar for agricultural labour work, same as for Mahuva, Pipavav daily wagers and Diamond workers. For better scope and
standard of living; some people permanently migrate to taluka or district place also.
Table no. 21: Demographic information Sl no
Village Population SC ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 1 Bambhaniya 1914 991 923 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 2 Dudhala No.2 1499 754 745 8 5 3 0.5 0 0 0 0 3 Lusadi 1514 770 747 40 18 22 2.6 0 0 0 0 4 Gundarani 1104 530 574 8 4 4 0.7 0 0 0 0 5 Haripara 339 174 165 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 6 Visavadar 615 311 302 9 4 5 1.5 0 0 0 0 7 Dundas 1485 745 740 20 12 8 1.3 0 0 0 0 8 Mota Pipalva 1139 587 552 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 9 Kankot 468 240 228 10 6 4 2.1 0 0 0 0
10 Nana Pipalva 923 475 448 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 11 Bildi 4247 2170 2077 13 7 6 0.3 0 0 0 0
TOTAL 15248 7747 7501 108 56 52 9.2 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
32
Table no. 22: Literacy rate
Sl no
Village Literacy Literacy %
above age 14 Literacy %
below age 14 Total % Male % Female %
1 Bambhaniya 1084 56.62 1227 64.12 940 49.12 66 35
2 Dudhala No.2 846 56.46 932 62.19 761 50.74 58 33
3 Lusadi 919 60.55 1005 66.25 832 54.44 62 41
4 Gundarani 636 57.59 704 63.74 568 51.44 55 40
5 Haripara 191 56.25 204 60.1 178 52.41 52 38
6 Visavadar 361 58.97 413 67.4 310 50.55 68 35
7 Dundas 844 56.84 973 65.54 715 48.14 71 26
8 Mota Pipalva 649 56.95 731 64.15 567 49.75 69 22
9 Kankot 292 62.45 324 69.13 261 55.78 65 20
10 Nana Pipalva 522 56.54 568 61.52 476 51.56 55 25
11 Bildi 2391 56.31 2706 63.72 2077 48.9 59 30
TOTAL 8735 57.77 9787 64.35 7685 51.16 680 345
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
33
Table no. 23: Migration details
Sl no Village Total
population
Migration Migration by months Main reason
for migration
Income during
migration / month
Total Male Female Up to 3 months
3-6 months More
than 6 months
1 Bambhaniya 1914 278 155 123 0 186 92 Employee
10000/-to 12000/-
2 Dudhala No.2 1499 216 110 106 0 144 72 Better Employee
3 Lusadi 1514 221 112 109 0 149 72 Employee
4 Gundarani 1104 160 90 70 0 108 52 Better Employee
5 Haripara 336 115 69 46 0 77 38 Employee
6 Visavadar 615 122 70 52 0 82 40 Better Employee
7 Dundas 1485 205 115 90 0 138 67 Employee
8 Mota Pipalva 1139 172 102 70 0 121 51 Better Employee
9 Kankot 468 66 38 28 0 45 21 Employee
10 Nana Pipalva 923 110 67 43 0 73 37 Better Employee
11 Bildi 4247 123 72 51 0 83 40
Employee
Total 15244 1788 1000 788 0 1206 582
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
34
Table no. 24: Poverty
Sl no
Village Total
Household
BPL % of BPL HH TotalLand less HH
% of land less HH 0-16 16-20 Total
1 Bambhaniya 405 2 6 8 1.98 35 8.64
2 Dudhala No.2 300 10 30 40 13.33 95 31.67
3 Lusadi 210 36 59 95 45.24 93 44.29
4 Gundarani 215 0 0 0 0.00 35 16.27
5 Haripara 95 3 0 3 3.16 15 15.79
6 Visavadar 91 5 30 35 38.46 31 34.07
7 Dundas 275 3 17 20 7.27 200 72.73
8 Mota Pipalva 220 14 44 58 26.36 130 59.09
9 Kankot 60 12 16 28 46.67 20 33.33
10 Nana Pipalva 245 35 55 90 36.73 120 48.98
11 Bildi 548 154 193 347 63.32 198 36.13
TOTAL 2664 274 450 724 1277
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
35
3.8.2 Infrastructure facilities
The project area is well connected with Mahuva taluka with pucca roads. The villages have electricity connectivity. Most of villages have an
Anganvadi, primary school and higher secondary school.
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Sl no
Village
Pucca road
to tha village (Y/N)
Schools
Colleges (Number)
Post Office
(Distance)
Banks (Number)
Distance from
nearest market
yard
Milk collection
centre (Number)
Milk cooperative
(Number)
Other cooperatives
/ CBIs (Number)
Any other institution LP UP HS
1 Bambhaniya Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 19 1 0 0 0 2 Dudhala No.2 Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 3 Lusadi Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 Gundarani Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 5 Haripara Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 6 Visavadar Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 7 Dundas Y 1 1 0 0 1 0 16 1 0 0 0 8 Mota Pipalva Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 9 Kankot Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0
10 Nana Pipalva Y 1 1 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 11 Bildi Y 2 1 0 0 1 0 23 1 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
36
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets
Sl no
Village HHs with
electricity
HHs with safety
latrines
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs with TV
set
HHs with cooking
gas
HHs with Drinking
water
HHs with
freedge Land line Mobile 2-whaeler 4-whaeler
1 Bambhaniya 385 14 5 350 35 5 193 15 405 15
2 Dudhala No.2 300 10 7 250 30 4 150 20 300 12
3 Lusadi 180 9 3 180 50 0 90 7 210 7
4 Gundarani 180 20 4 160 45 2 90 15 215 7
5 Haripara 70 25 6 70 35 0 35 8 95 3
6 Visavadar 81 60 8 81 28 0 41 5 91 3
7 Dundas 150 20 9 150 42 3 75 20 275 6
8 Mota Pipalva 80 18 5 75 32 3 40 7 220 3
9 Kankot 50 20 8 45 20 0 25 3 60 2
10 Nana Pipalva 230 15 6 220 80 2 115 4 245 9
11 Bildi 480 140 10 475 100 5 240 25 548 19
TOTAL 2186 351 71 2056 497 24 1094 129 2664 86
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
37
Table no. 27: Per capita Income Sl no
Village Agriculture Forestry Animal husbandry Casual labour Services Handicraft Others Total
1 Bambhaniya 14500 0 4000 4100 6000 800 2060 31460
2 Dudhala No.2 14000 0 4600 3800 4700 1200 2112 30412
3 Lusadi 12020 0 5400 3700 3100 1300 1667 27187
4 Gundarani 14500 0 6540 4800 3800 1100 1912 32652
5 Haripara 13500 0 4500 2800 8000 1500 845 31145
6 Visavadar 12500 0 5400 3200 4300 1000 910 27310
7 Dundas 13100 0 4500 4100 6000 1400 1882 30982
8 Mota Pipalva 12540 0 4800 4000 4500 1700 1405 28945
9 Kankot 14500 0 4000 2900 2500 1700 1272 26872
10 Nana Pipalva 12500 0 4500 4500 2900 1500 1560 27460
11 Bildi 14400 0 4000 2700 3000 1100 945 26145
Project average 13460 0 4749 3691 4436 1300 1506 29143
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
38
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sr. No Village Benefit type 1 Bharvad Benefit type 2 Fual Benefit type 2 Total
income % sells Income % sells Income % sells Income 1 Bambhaniya 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Dudhala No.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Lusadi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Gundarani 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Haripara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Visavadar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Dundas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Mota Pipalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Kankot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Nana Pipalva 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 Bildi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3.8.3 Livelihood pattern
Agriculture, Casual labour, and Animal Husbandry are basic occupation in the project area. Income from agriculture is comparative batter due to good
productivity but still it is not up to mark. Animal husbandry is Subsidiary occupation of many farmers. Labour are not getting work round the year so
during off-season so they are migrate to other place for better employment for more than 210 days. New livelihood opportunities for asset less can
reduce migration of people.
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)
Sl no
Village Total
workforce Agriculture
Animal husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture + AH
Casual labour
Services Handicraft Others
1 Bambhaniya 405 150 14 220 15 1 3 2
2 Dudhala No.2 300 85 13 120 71 4 5 2
3 Lusadi 210 47 15 70 71 2 2 3
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
39
4 Gundarani 215 80 7 100 25 1 1 1
5 Haripara 95 35 0 35 13 0 1 1
6 Visavadar 91 20 6 40 25 0 0 0
7 Dundas 275 35 25 40 169 3 2 1
8 Mota Pipalva 220 30 18 60 105 3 2 2
9 Kankot 60 15 4 25 13 1 1 1
10 Nana Pipalva 245 35 20 90 93 3 3 1
11 Bildi 548 150 30 200 147 10 7 4
TOTAL 2664 682 152 1000 747 28 27 18
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
40
CHAPTER 4 WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT WORK
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
41
4. Watershed Activities
Watershed Management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rainfed area of semi-arid tropics. These areas are
characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility low literacy rate, migration, less knowledge about new technology used in agriculture
and many more. Several studies identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The
common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1 Scientific Planning
(I) Cluster Approach
The new approach envisages a broader vision of geo-hydrological units normally of average size of 1,000 to 5,000 hectares comprising of clusters of
micro- watersheds Gundarni project consist of Six micro-watersheds with 5G2A7b1f, 5G2A7b1d, 5G2A6b2k, 5G2A6b2h, 5G2A6b2j, 5G2A6c2c
as their codes.
(II) Baseline Survey
To access the impact if any watershed development programs a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a benchmark for any
intervention during and post implementation of any development program. A detailed baseline survey was conducted which involved household
census survey, Bio- physical survey and Village level data from Talati cum Mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which
was been filled by visiting each and every housed hold in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the literacy percentage,
SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and
various schemes running and their benefits.
(III) Technical survey
Technical survey or Bio-physical survey was conducted to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well
in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. Existing structure in field and site for
new structure can be identifying by this survey.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
42
(IV) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the program. This has
created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local Indigenous technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any
activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete
accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season calendars were used to understand the
physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease that the complicated
questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix Ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops,
various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers.
(V) Use of GIS and Remote Sensing for Planning
Use of various high scientific tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
(a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL
population, SC/ST population, Ground water status, Drinking water facility, Slope percent. These were all given proper Weightage according to the
DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
(b) Planning
A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking in to account various features like slope percent, soil depth, soil
texture, soil erosion in the area for waste land, forest land and agriculture land. Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every
water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of
1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.
(c) Hydrological modeling
Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and flow accumulation. This model overlaid over
cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like check dam, etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally
occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
43
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects.
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whathar scientific criteria was
used
(A) Planning Cluster approach Yes Whather technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of tha Institute
BISAG
Baseline survey Yes Hydro-geological survey Yes Contour mapping Yes Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes Ridge to Valley treatment Yes Online IT connectivity between Yes
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DOLR Yes
Availability of GIS layers Yes
1. Cadastral map Yes 2. Village boundaries Yes 3. Drainage Yes 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 5. Land use Yes 6. Ground water status Yes 7. Watershed boundaries Yes 8. Activity Yes Crop simulation models# Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Station
Yes
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
44
(B) Inputs Yes 1. Bio-pesticides Yes 2. Organic manures Yes 3. Vermicompost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing Yes 8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers Yes
Any othar (please specify) #NDVI - Ratio of tha differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
45
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area Sr. No.
Name of the PRA Activity / FGD
Date Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation
1 Social Mapping
29/8/2012
to
28/9/2012
Main Festevals:- Diwali, Holi
High Expenditure on Social Occasions
Village Insititution: Gram Panchayat, Dairy Co Operative, Temple etc
2 Resource Mapping
Main Source of Income: Agriculture & Animal Husbendury
Drinking Water Sources: Open wells & Hand Pump
Rain Fed Agriculture
Average Land Holding- 2.12 Ha.
3 Transect Walk
Observation
Irrigation Source
Open Well/Bore Well
Area Under Rabi Session: (Main Crop wheat, Onion)
Oil Engine use for Irrigation Facilities
Agriculture
Major Crops : Cotton, Groundnut, Onion, Bajari, Wheat etc.
Lack of Knowledge of Improved Agriculture Practices
Use of local Varity of seed Reduced the crop Prodction
Low Prices of Crop Due to Lack of Market Linkage
Un known about Modern Technology
Local Animal Breed
4 Focused Group
Discussion
Poor Fertility of Soil & Crop Production
Improved Seed & Production
Less Vegetables Farming
Improvement of Cattle Breed & Milk Production
Women Demand for more Employment in Project Village
Women Interested in SHG
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
46
Problem Tree
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
47
Object tree analysis
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
48
4.2 Institution Building (I) Watershed Committee (WC)
The Gram Sabha will constitute the Watershed Committee (WC) to implement the Watershed project with the technical support of the WDT in the
village. The Watershed Committee (WC) has to be registered under the Society Registration Act, 1860. The Gram Sabha may elect/appoint any suitable
person from the village as the Chairman of Watershed Committee. The secretary of the Watershed Committee (WC) will be a paid functionary of the
Watershed Committee (WC). The Watershed Committee (WC) will comprise of at least 10 members, half of the members shall be representatives of
SHGs and User Groups, SC/ST community, women and landless persons in the village. One member of the WDT shall also be represented in the
Watershed Committee (WC). Where the Panchayat covers more than one village, they would constitute a separate subcommittee for each village to
manage the watershed development project in the concerned village. Where a watershed project covers more than one Gram Panchayat, separate
committees will be constituted for each Gram Panchayat. The Watershed Committee (WC) would be provided with an independent rented office
accommodation with Internet connected computer for IT link up.
The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the project implementation period.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
49
Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details – BAMBHANIYA
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
other
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1
NANKUBHAI
LAXMANBHAI
GONDLIA
President M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 3
2
BABUBHAI
MEGHABHAI
SISARA
Secretary M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 6
3
REKHABEN
BHARATBHAI
GOHIL
Member F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 5
4
DHIRUBHAI
MEGHABHAI
SISAARA
Member M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 5
5
INDUBEN
RADHESHYAM
SADHU(HARIYANA
Member F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 10
6
RUKHADBHAI
VALABHAI
RABARI
Member M - - - - - Y - - - - SDT 5
7 BABUBHAI
KABABHAI KAVAT Member M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 2
8
KASHIBEN
BOGHABHAI
BHATI
Member F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
50
9
BABUBHAI
RANCHHODBHAI
SISARA
Member M - - - Y - - - - - - STD 5
10
JASVANTBHAI
BENDKAR Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOKBHAI
MAKWANA Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details – DUDHALA NO 2
Sl. No
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 MADHUBHAI
BHIKHA BHUKAN
President M - - - Y - - - - - - STD 7
2 KANTIBHAI
UMIYASHNAKER DAVE
Secretary M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 7
3 REKHABEN
HIMMATBHAI VALA
Member F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 3
4 AEBHALBHAI RAVATBHAI
BHUKAN
Member M - - - - - - Y - - - UN EDU.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
51
5 REKHAEBN
CHETANBHAI PARMAR
Member F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 12
6 KABABHAI KAABHAI PARMAR
Member M - - - - - Y - - - - UN EDU.
7 DAYABHAI DULABHAI THUMMAR
Member M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 6
8 HANSHABEN BABUBHAI MAKWANA
Member F - - - - - - - - Y - STD 6
9 MANUBHAI JERAMBHAI
BORIA
Member M Y - - - - - - - - - UN EDU.
10
JASVANTRAO BENDKAR
Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOBHAI MAKWANA
Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details – LUSDI
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F
SC ST SF MF LF
Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 MANABHAI HIPABHAI ZANJADA
President M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 6
2 DANUBHAI DADUBHAI
Secretary M - - - Y - - - - - - STD 8
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
52
MOBH
3 PASUBEN MANUBHAI
BHUKAN
Member F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 7
4 MERAMANBHAI UKABHAI BHUKAN
Member M - - - - - - - - - Y STD 7
5 HANSABEN BACHUBHAI
VAGHELA
Member F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 5
6 TOFANBHAI SAMATBHAI
BHUKAN
Member M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 6
7 ODHABHAI RAVATBHAI
ZANJADA
Member M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 5
8 LILABEN BAVKUBHAI
BHUKAN
Member F - - - - - - - - Y - STD 3
9 DAYABHAI MAYABHAI
VINJUDA
Member M Y - - - - - - - - - UN EDU.
10 JASVANTRAO BENDKAR
Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11 ASHOKBHAI MAKWANA
Member M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
53
Table no. 32.4: Watershed Committee details – GUNDARNI
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society
(dd/mm/ yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 BHUPATBHAI
HARIBHAI TARSARIA
PRESIDENT M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 3
2 PRAVINBHAI THAKARSINH
BHAI MANDVIA
SECRETARY M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 10
3 DEVUBEN
MANUBHAI VAGH
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 3
4 MANJUBEN
VASHRAMBHAI VINJUDA
MEMBER F - - - - - - Y - - - STD 2
5 LAXMANBHAI
AMRABHAI VAGH
MEMBER M y - - - - - - - - - STD 7
6 KANTIBHAI BABUBHAI CHAUHAN
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 10
7 VINUBHAI AMARSINHBHAI
RAVAL
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 5
8 GITABEN SANJAYBHAI
SARVIYA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN.EDU
9 MANOJBHAI MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 7
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
54
NANJIBHAI KAKLOTAR
10
JASVANTRAO BENDKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOKBHAI MAKWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.5: Watershed Committee details – HARIPARA
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 HARIBHAI RAMBHAI
GHOGHARI
PRESIDENT M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 3
2 PRAVINBHAI
HARIBHAI GHOGHARI
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 10
3 VANITABEN BIPINBHAI GHOGHARI
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 3
4 CHHAGANBHAI SHAMBHUBHAI
BAVADIYA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y STD 2
5 BHARTIBEN LAKHABHAI PARAMAR
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 10
6 DEVASIBHAI KABABHAI BHARAVAD
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 10
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
55
(GAMARA)
7 SANJAYBHAI JIVANBHAI GHOGHARI
MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 5
8 VIMUBEN JETHABHAI
MAKAWANA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 HASAMUKHBHAI JAVERBHAI GHOGHARI
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 7
10 JASAVANTRAV BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11 ASHOKBHAI MAAKWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.6: Watershed Committee details – VISAVADAR
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 SHAMAJIBHAI
RUDABHAI BHALIYA
PRESADANT M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 1
2 NRASHIBHAI NNABHAI BHALIYA
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 7
3 RADHABEN
RAGHAVBHAI BHALIYA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - UN EDU.
4 HIMATBHAI
CHOTHABHAI MAKAWANA
MEMBER M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 4
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
56
5 JYOTIBEN
NITINDAS HARIJAN (MAKAWANA )
MEMBER F Y - - - - - - - - - STD 10
6 VISHNUBHAI BHIMABHAI
BHALIYA
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 4
7 GNESHBHAI AKDAVABHAI
BHALIYA
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 5
8 PARVATIBEN KABABHAI BHALIYA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 DULABHAI NNABHAI BHALIYA
MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 4
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.7: Watershed Committee details – DUNDAS
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 LALJIBHAI MOHANBHAI GAJERA
PRESADANT M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 3
2 KANUBHAI POPATBHAI SOVADIA
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 10
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
57
3 DAYABEN LALJIBHAI GAJERA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 3
4 BHARATBHAI JERAMBHAI SOVADIA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y STD 7
5 BHAVNABEN KANUBHAI SOVADIA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y STD 7
6 JAYSUKHBHAI TAPUBHAI
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 6
7 DHIRUBHAI LAXMANBHAI BARIA
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 4
8 VALBAYBEN BHAVANBHAI
CHAVDA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 MUKESHBHAI CHHANABHAI
MEMBER M Y - - - - - - - - - UN EDU.
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.8: Watershed Committee details – MOTA PIPLVA
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 NARESHBHAI MALABHAI SANKHAT
PRESADANT M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 9
2 MAGANBHAI MULUBHAI SANKHAT
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 5
3 JIVIBEN SUKHABHAI MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - UN EDU.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
58
SANKHAT
4 MALABHAI
GHUGHABHAI SANKHAT
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y STD 1
5 ANJUBEN
THAKARSINHBHAI RAVAL
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 7
6 BAVBHAI NATHABHAI PARMAR
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 4
7 JADAVBHAI SODABHAI SANKHAT
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 2
8 PUNIBENSHAMJIBHAI BARAIYA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 GOBARBHAI BHAGVANBHAI
PARMAR
MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - UN EDU.
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11
ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.9: Watershed Committee details – KANKOT
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 TULSIBHAI UKABHAI HADIA
PRESADANT M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 7
2 JIVANBHAI RUDABHAI VORA
SECRETARY M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 11
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
59
3 RAMUBEN RUDABHAI VORA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - UN EDU.
4 HIMMATBHAI GOVINDBHAI
RATHOD
MEMBER M Y - - - - - - - - - STD 8
5 GITABEN RAVJIBHAI SIYAL
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 7
6 MEGHABHAI OGHADBHAI
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - UN EDU.
7 DULABHAI BHIMABHAI LADUMOR
MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 12
8 KANCHANBEN KANJIBHAI ZALA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 JAYNATIBHAI KHATABHAI CHUDASMA
MEMBER M - - - Y - - - - - - STD 5
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
1 ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.10: Watershed Committee details – NANA PIPLVA
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
other Educational qualification
Function/s assigned#
1 NARSINHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI
PRESADANT M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 5
2 LAKHABHAI AMRABHAI GHAPA
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 8
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
60
3 GITABEN
KATHADBHAI SHIYAL
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - STD 2
4 UKABHAI
BHANABHAI BAMBHANIYA
MEMBER M - - - Y - - - - - - STD 3
5 NITABEN
HITESHBHAI PUROHIT
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 10
6 MALLABHAI
RANCHHODBHAI BAMBHANIA
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - STD 3
7 BHARATBHAI BIJALBHAI SHIYAL
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 8
8 LAXMIBEN VELJIBHAI SHIYAL
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 BHAGVANBHAI CHHAGANBHAI BAMBHANIYA
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - UN EDU.
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11 ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
Table no. 32.11: Watershed Committee details – BILDI
Sl. No.
Names of WCs
Date of Registration as a Society (dd/mm/
yyyy)
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF Land-less
UG SHG GP Any
othar
Educa-tional
qualifi-cation
Function/s assigned#
1 PATABHAI RANABHAI
PRESADANT M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 2
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
61
DHUNDHALVA
2 KHODABHAI KANABHAI
BAMBHANIA
SECRETARY M - - Y - - - - - - - STD 10
3 SHANTUBEN
HARIBHAI DHUNDHALVA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - Y - - UN EDU.
4 AANANDBHAI KHODABHAI
KHANIA
MEMBER M Y - - - - - - - - - STD 1
5 LADUBEN
BOGHABHAI DHUNDHALVA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - - Y STD 2
6 MAGANBHAI UKABHAI BARAIA
MEMBER M - - - - - Y - - - - UN EDU.
7 NATHABHAI SOMABHAI KAVAT
MEMBER M - - - - - - Y - - - STD 4
8 BHANIBEN BACHUBAHI
DHUNDHALVA
MEMBER F - - - - - - - - Y - UN EDU.
9 MANUBHAI CHITHARBHAI
KAVAT
MEMBER M - - - - Y - - - - - STD 3
10
JASAVANT BHAI BENDAKAR
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
11 ASHOKBHAI MAWANA
MEMBER M - - - - - - - - - Y GRADUATE
# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned. A. PNP and PRA B. Planning C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
62
ii) Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group initiative especially
for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.
Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following
observations:
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
Table no. 33: SHG detail
S. No. Name of village
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category No. of BPL in each
category With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Bambhania 02 02 00 04
(i) Landless 24 24 48 1 1 2 6 4 10
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 02 02 00 04 24 24 48 1 1 2 6 4 10
2 Dudhala No.
2 2 2 0 4
(i) Landless 24 24 48 4 4 8 5 4 9
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 2 0 4 24 24 48 4 4 8 5 4 9
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
63
3 Lusadi 1 3 0 4
(i) Landless 13 36 49 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 3 0 4 13 36 49 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Gundarni 2 2 0 4
(i) Landless 24 24 48 4 4 8 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 2 0 4 24 24 48 4 4 8 0 0 0
5 Haripara 1 1 0 2
(i) Landless 12 12 24 0 0 0 2 2 4
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
1 1 0 2 12 12 24 0 0 0 2 2 4
6 Visavadar 0 1 0 1
(i) Landless 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 12
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1 0 1 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 12 12
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
64
7 Dundas 2 2 0 4
(i) Landless 24 24 48 12 0 12 0 8 8
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 2 0 4 24 24 48 12 0 12 0 8 8
8 Mota Piplva 1 1 0 2
(i) Landless 12 12 48 0 0 0 0 12 12
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 1 0 2 12 12 48 0 0 0 0 12 12
9 Kankot 1 0 0 1
(i) Landless 12 0 12 12 0 12
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 0 0 1 12 0 12 12 0 12
10 Nana
Piplava 0 1 0 1
(i) Landless 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 5 5
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
65
Total 0 1 0 1 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 5 5
11 Bildi 2 2 0 4
(i) Landless 24 24 48 6 6 12 6 6 12
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 2 0 4 24 24 48 6 6 12 6 6 12
iii) User Group:
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collects user
charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Table no. 34: UG detail
S. No. Name of village
Total no. of registered UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category
No. of BPL in each category
With only Men
With only Women
With both
Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Bambhania 26 0 0 26
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 52 10 62 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 18 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 18 2 22 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
26 0 0 26 Total.. 90 14 104 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Dudhala No.
2 21 0 0 21
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 44 8 52 2 0 2 0 0 0
(iii) MF 13 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
66
(iv) LF 13 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total
21 0 0 21 Total.. 70 12 82 2 0 2 0 0 0
3 Lusadi 18 0 0 18
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 40 4 44 10 0 10 0 0 0
(iii) MF 14 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 13 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
18 0 0 18 Total.. 67 9 76 10 0 10 0 0 0
4 Gundarni 33 0 0 33
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 74 10 84 04 0 04 0 0 0
(iii) MF 38 4 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 13 3 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
33 0 0 33 Total.. 125 17 142 04 0 04 0 0 0
5 Haripara 13 0 0 13
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 30 6 36 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 15 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 15 2 17 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
13 0 0 13 Total.. 60 10 70 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 Visavadar 9 0 0 9
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 18 6 24 01 0 01 0 0 0
(iii) MF 10 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total
9 0 0 9 Total 32 8 40 01 0 01 0 0 0
7 Dundas 28 0 0 28
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 62 8 70 07 0 07 0 0 0
(iii) MF 17 4 21 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 17 4 21 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
67
Total 28 0 0 28 Total.. 96 16 112 07 0 07 0 0 0
8 Mota
Piplava 12 0 0 12
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 26 4 30 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 7 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 7 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 12 0 0 12 Total.. 40 8 48 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 Kankot 9 0 0 9
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 20 3 23 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 6 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 9 0 0 9 Total.. 31 5 36 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 Nana
Piplava 10 0 0 10
(i) Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 22 2 24 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 6 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 6 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 10 0 0 10 Total.. 34 6 40 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 Biladi 21 0 0 21 (i) Landless
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 45 6 51 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
68
(iii) MF 13 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 12 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 21 0 0 21 Total.. 70 14 84 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grand Total 713 119 834 24 0 24 0 0 0
4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP 18
4.3.1 Entry point activities (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; generally, certain
important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with watershed Development
Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 27.19 Lacks was allotted for EPA activity; which was 4 per cent
of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them
that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument
of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in Lacks Rs.)
S. No. Names of Villages
Amount earmarked
for EPA
Entry Point Activities planned
Estimated cost
Fund Used under IWMP
Fund Available by Convergence
Convergence
Schame
Expected outcome
1 Bambhaniya 3.683 Old well Repairing 2.200 2.200 0.000 - Benefit to animal
Water Tank Repairing 1.483 1.483 0.000 - Benefit to Village
2 Dudhala-2 3.166
Vav Repairing 1.326 1.326 0.000 - Benefit to Village
New Drainage Line (185 Mt.)
1.840 1.840 0.000 - Benefit to animal
3 Lusadi 3.003 Water Tank Repairing 1.500 1.500 0.000 - Improve Water
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
69
Condition
Bore Repairing 1.503 1.503 0.000 - Improve Storage
Capacity
4 Gundrani 3.884 Check Dam Repairing 1.500 1.500 0.000 -
Improve Water Condition
Well Repairing 2.384 2.384 0.000 -
5 Haripara 1.627 New Snanghath 1.627 1.627 0.000 - Benefit to Village
6 Visavadar 0.878 Cattle Trough Repairing 0.873 0.873 0.000 - Benefit to Village
7 Dundas 3.815
Cattle Trough Repairing 0.400 0.400 0.000 - Benefit to Village Well & Water Tank
Repairing 2.465 2.465 0.000 - Benefit to Village
New Drainage Line (30 Mt.)
0.500 0.500 0.000 - Benefit to Village
Snanghat Repairing 0.450 0.450 0.000 - Benefit to Village
8 Mota Pipalva 1.744 Well Repairing 1.000 1.000 0.000 - Benefit to Village
Check Dam Repairing 0.744 0.744 0.000 -
9 Kankot 1.290 Well Repairing - 1 0.650 0.650 0.000 - Benefit to Village
Well Repairing - 2 0.630 0.630 0.000
10 Nana Pipalva 0.964 New Snanghat 0.964 0.964 0.000 - Benefit to Village
11 Bildi 3.141 New Drainage Line (1000
Mt) 3.141 3.141 0.000 - Benefit to Village
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
70
4.3.2 Watershed Development work Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach should be
approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allocated for this work.
Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*
S. No.
Village name
Name of structures
Type of treatment Type of land Target
(i) Ridge area (R)
(ii) Drainage line (D)
(iii) Land dev. (L)
(i) Pri-vate (P)
(ii) Community
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
No.
Unit (No./
cu.m./ rmt)
Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)
M W O T
1 Bambhaniya
Gully plug R - - - C 14 No - - - 4.9
Land Levelling - - L P - - 14 Ha - - - 3.36
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 18 No - - - 2.16
Farm Bund - - L P - - 5810 Rmt - - - 2.91
Farm Pond - - L P - - 16 No - - - 3.84
Earthen bund - - L P 425 Rmt 1.11
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 6297 18.28
2 Dudhala N0.
2
Gully plug R - - - C 12 No - - - 4.2
Land Levelling - - L P - - 13 Ha - - - 3.12
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 9 No - - - 1.08
Farm Bund - - L P - - 4290 Rmt - - - 2.15
Farm Pond - - L P - - 10 No - - - 2.4
Earthen bund - - L P 325 Rmt 0.85
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 4659 13.79
3 Lusadi Gully plug R - - - C 7 No - - - 2.45
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
71
Land Levelling - - L P - - 10 Ha - - - 2.4
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 12 No - - - 1.44
Farm Bund - - L P - - 1375 Rmt - - - 0.69
Farm Pond - - L P - - 16 No - - - 3.84
Any others (pl.
specify) - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 1420 10.82
4 Gundarni
Gully plug R - - - C 16 No - - - 5.6
Land Levelling - - L P - - 5 Ha - - - 1.2
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 10 No - - - 1.2
Farm Bund - - L P - - 3565 Rmt - - - 1.783
Farm Pond - - L P - - 9 No - - - 2.16
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 3605 11.943
5 Haripara
Gully plug R - - - C 6 No - - - 2.1
Land Levelling - - L P - - 5 Ha - - - 1.2
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 8 No - - - 0.96
Farm Bund - - L P - - 1340 Rmt - - - 0.67
Any others (pl.
specify) - - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 1359 4.93
6 Visavadar
Gully plug R - - - C 4 No - - - 1.4
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 5 No - - - 0.6
Farm Bund - - L P - - 285 Rmt - - - 0.143
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total - - - - - - 1653 - - - 7.073
7 Dundas Gully plug R - - - C 17 No - - - 5.95
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
72
Land Levelling - - L P - - 16 Ha - - - 3.84
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 16 No - - - 1.92
Farm Bund - - L P - - 3340 Rmt - - - 1.67
Farm Pond - - L P - - 11 No - - - 2.64
Earthan bund - - L P 1015 Rmt 2.639
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - 0
Total 4414 18.659
8 Mota
Pipalva
Gully plug R - - - C 6 No - - - 2.1
Land Levelling - - L P - - 9 Ha - - - 2.16
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 5 No - - - 0.6
Farm Bund - - L P - - 1035 Rmt - - - 0.518
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 1055 5.378
9 Kankot
Gully plug R - - - C 6 No - - - 2.1
Land Levelling - - L P - - 5 Ha - - - 1.2
Farm Bund - - L P - - 875 Rmt - - - 0.438
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 11 3.738
10 Nana Piplva
Gully plug R - - - C 4 No - - - 1.4
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 5 No - - - 0.6
Farm Bund - - L P - - 490 Rmt - - - 0.245
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 499 2.245
11 Bildi Gully plug R - - - C 12 No - - - 4.2
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
73
Land Levelling - - L P - - 9 Ha - - - 2.158
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 7 No - - - 0.84
Farm Bund - - L P - - 1260 Rmt - - - 0.63
Farm Pond - - L P - - 8 No - - - 1.92
Earthan bund - - L P 830 Rmt 2.16
Any others (pl. specify)
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Total 2126 11.908
Grand Total 106.29
M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total) Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.)
S. No.
Village name
Type of structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing structures
Construction of new structures Total target
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
No.
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Storage capacity
Estimated cost
1 Bambhaniya
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 5.5 0 0 5.5
Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6.6 0 0 6.6
Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6.52 0 0 6.52
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5.9 0 0 5.9
West Wear 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3.36 0 0 3.36
Pond Deepening 2 0 0 3.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.25
Checkdam Desilting
2 0 0 3.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.2
Total 4 0 0 6.45 22 0 0 27.88 0 0 34.33
2 Dudhala N0.
2
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4.4 0 0 4.4
Check wall 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6.6 0 0 6.6
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
74
Check dam 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9.78 0 0 9.78
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.95 0 0 2.95
New Pond 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.2 0 0 3.2
West Wear 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.6 0 0 2.6
Checkdam Desilting
1 0 0 1.35 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.35
Total 1 0 0 1.35 20 0 0 29.53 0 0 30.88
3 Lusadi
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 2.75 0 0 2.75
Check wall 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4.4 0 0 4.4
Check dam 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9.78 0 0 9.78
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5.9 0 0 5.9
West Wear 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1.9 0 0 1.9
Pond Deepening 2 0 0 3.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.9
Checkdam Desilting
1 0 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.1
Total 3 0 0 5 15 0 0 24.73 0 0 29.73
4 Gundarni
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 7.15 0 0 7.15
Check wall 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9.9 0 0 9.9
Check dam 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 16.3 0 0 16.3
New Pond 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.25 0 0 3.25
Checkdam Desilting
3 0 0 4.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.45
Checkdam Repairing
2 0 0 3.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.4
Total 5 0 0 7.85 28 0 0 36.6 0 0 44.45
5 Haripara Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2
Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
75
Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 7.96 0 0 7.96
New Pond 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.9 0 0 2.9
Checkdam Desilting
2 0 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6
Checkdam Repairing
1 0 0 1.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.15
Total 3 0 0 3.75 9 0 0 15.26 0 0 19.01
6 Visavadar Nala plug 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1.65 0 0 1.65
Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.26 0 0 3.26
New Pond With West Weer
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.8 0 0 3.8
Total 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8.71 0 0 8.71
7 Dundas
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 6.6 0 0 6.6
Check wall 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9.9 0 0 9.9
Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6.52 0 0 6.52
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5.9 0 0 5.9
Pond With West Veer
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.9 0 0 3.9
Pond Deepening 2 0 0 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.5
Total 2 0 0 4.5 26 0 0 32.82 0 0 37.32
8 Mota
Pipalva
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2
Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2
Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6.52 0 0 6.52
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.95 0 0 2.95
Pond With West Veer
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.8 0 0 2.8
Pond Deepening 1 0 0 2.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.8
Checkdam 1 0 0 1.15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.15
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
76
Repairing
Total 2 0 0 3.95 10 0 0 16.67 0 0 20.62
9 Kankot
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1.65 0 0 1.65
Check wall 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.2 0 0 2.2
Check dam 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 6.52 0 0 6.52
Cause way cum Check dam
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2.75 0 0 2.75
Checkdam Desilting
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1.35 0 0 1.35
Checkdam Repairing
0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1.65 0 0 1.65
Total
0 0 0 0 12 0 0 16.12 0 0 16.12
10 Nana Piplva
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1.65 0 0 1.65
Check wall 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1.1 0 0 1.1
Check dam 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.26 0 0 3.26
New Pond With West Weer
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.8 0 0 3.8
Total 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 9.81 0 0 9.81
Bildi
Nala plug 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 4.4 0 0 4.4
Check wall 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5.5 0 0 5.5
Check dam 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 13.04 0 0 13.04
11 New Pond With West Weer
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.8 0 0 3.8
Pond Deepening 1 0 0 1.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.9
Checkdam Desilting
1 0 0 1.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.8
Checkdam Repairing
1 0 0 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95
Total 3 0 0 4.65 18 0 0 26.74 0 0 31.39
Grand total 23 0 0 37.5 171 0 0 244.87 0 0 282.37
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
77
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in Lacks Rs.)
S. No. Name of Villages
Type of structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing recharging structures
Construction of new recharging structures
Total target
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
No. Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
Area to be irrigated
(ha)
Estimated cost
1 Bambhaniya Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 08 0 1.92 1.92
Total for the village 0 0 0 08 0 1.92 0 1.92
2
Dudhala-2
Rain Roof water Harvesting structure
0 0 0 15 0 3.60 3.60
Total for the village 0 0 0 15 0 3.60 0 3.60
3 Lusadi Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 15 3.60 0 3.60
Total for the village 0 0 0 15 0 3.60 0 3.60
4 Gundarni Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 14 3.36 0 3.36
Total for the village 0 0 0 14 0 3.36 0 3.36
5
Haripara
Rain Roof water Harvesting structure
0 0 0 6 1.44 1.44
Total for the village 0 0 0 6 0 1.44 0 1.44
6
Visavadar
Rain Roof water Harvesting structure
0 0 0 6 1.44 1.44
Total for the village 0 0 0 6 0 1.44 0 1.44
7 Dundas Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 8 1.92 1.92
Total for the village 0 0 0 8 0 1.92 0 1.92
8 Mota Piplva Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 5 1.20 1.20
Total for the village 0 0 0 5 0 1.20 0 1.20
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
78
9 Kankot Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 5 1.20 1.20
Total for the village 0 0 0 5 0 1.20 0 1.20
10 Nana Piplva Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 6 1.44 1.44
Total for the village 0 0 0 6 0 1.44 0 1.44
11 Bildi Rain Roof water
Harvesting structure 0 0 0 10 2.40 2.40
Total for the village 0 0 0 10 0 2.40 0 2.40
Total for the Project 0 0 0 98 0 23.52 0 23.52
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises
S. No.
Name of village
Name of activity Quantity
No/ha/unit
Type of land Executing
agency Target
(i) Private (ii)
Community
(iii) Others
(pl. specify)
(i) UG (ii)SHG (iii) Others (pl.
specify)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in Lacks)
1 Bambhaniya
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Wheat (GW 496) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P
UG 0.24
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P
UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House 1 No. P - - SHG -
Green House Individual 22 No. p - - UG 8.80
Cattle Feed 1 No. p - - SHG 2.00
Dairy Equipment 1 No. p - - SHG 2.00
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre (Cattle Feed) 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 16 No. p UG 17.60
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
79
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual 8 No P - - UG 1.20
Vermi Compost to SHG 1 No. p SHG 2.00
Vermi Compost Unit 1 No. p - - SHG 2.00
Agricultural allied activity
Mini Oil Mill 0 - - - - -
Dairy Development 0.00 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development 1 Ha. C UG 1.70
Minor Activities
Cement Block - - - - - -
Thresher - - - - - -
2 Dudhala no 2
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P - - ug 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre (Cattle Feed) 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 10 No. p - - UG 3.84
Vermi Compost Unit 1 No. p - - SHG 2.00
Dairy Equipment 1 no p - - SHG 1.00
Cattle Feed 1no p - - SHG 2.00
Organic Farming
Vermi Compost to Individual 8 No P - - UG 1.20
Vermi Compost to SHG 1 No. p SHG 2.00
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
80
Agricultural allied activity
Rotavator - - - - - -
Dairy Development 0.00
Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development 1 Ha. C UG 1.70
Minor Activities
Thresher - - - - - -
3 Lusdi
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Net House 1 No p - - SHG 2.00
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre (Cattle Feed) 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 5 No. p UG 1.20
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual 9 No P - - UG 1.35
Vermi Compost to SHG 1 No. p SHG 2.00
Agricultural allied activity
Dairy Development
Pasture Land Development 2 Ha. C UG 3.40 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
4 Gundrani
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Wheat (GW 496) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
81
Cotton 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Cattle Feed 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Net House 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 20 No. p UG 4.80 Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual 8 No P - - UG 1.20
Vermi Compost 1 no P - - SHG 2.00
Dairy Development 0.00
Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development 1 Ha. C UG 1.70
5 Haripara
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Wheat (GW 496) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Cattle Feed 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 8 No. p UG 1.92
Dairy Development 0.00
Dairy Equipment 1 no p - - SHG 1.66
Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
4 nos C UG 1.20
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
82
Pasture Land Development - - - - - -
6 Visavadar
Crop Demonstration
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Drip Irrigation 4 No. p - - UG 0.96
Cattle feed 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual - - - - - -
Vermi Compost to SHG - - - - - -
Dairy Development 0.00 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
3 nos C UG 0.90
Pasture Land Development - - - - - -
7 Dundas
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Gam Guvar 2 no P - - UG 0.48
Cotton 2 no P - - - UG 0.48
Til 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Drip Irrigation 12 No. p UG 2.88
Agro Centre 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Cattle Feed 1 no p - - SHG 2.00 Net House 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
83
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual 15 No P - - UG 2.25
Vermi Compost 1no p - - UG 2.00
Dairy Development 0.00 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos P C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development 1 HA P - - UG 1.70
8 Mota Piplava
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Bajara 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Ajama 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre - - - - - -
Cattle Feed 1 no p - - SHG 1.92
Net House 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 8 No. p UG 1.92 Organic Farming
Vermi Compost to Individual - - - - - -
Vermi Compost - - - - - 2.00
Dairy Development 0.00
Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
5 nos C UG 1.50
Pasture Land Development - - - - - -
9 Kankot Crop Demonstration
Cotton 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
84
Gam Guvar 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre - - - - - -
Cattle Feed 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Net House - - - - - -
Drip Irrigation 4 No. p - - UG 0.96
Handicraft 1 no p - - SHG 0.90
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual - - - - - -
Vermi Compost - - - - - -
Dairy Development 0.00 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development - - - - - -
10 Nana
Piplava
Crop Demonstration
- - - - - -
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre - - - - - -
Cattle Feed 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Net House - - - - - -
Drip Irrigation 4 No. p UG 0.96
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual - - - - - -
Vermi Compost - - - - - -
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
85
Dairy Development 0.00 Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development - - - - - -
11 Bildi
Crop Demonstration
Groundnut 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Cotton 1 no P - - UG 0.24 Wheat (GW 496) 1 no P - - - UG 0.24
Onion (Light Red) 1 no P - - UG 0.24
Promotion of Agricultural Activities
Green House - - - - - -
Green House Individual - - - - - -
Productivity Enhancement
Agro Centre 1 no. P - - SHG 2.00
Dairy Equipment 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Cattle Feed - - - - - -
Handicraft 1 no p - - SHG 1.06
Net House 1 no p - - SHG 2.00
Drip Irrigation 8 No. p UG 1.92
Organic Farming 0.00
Vermi Compost to Individual 10 No P - - UG 1.50
Vermi Compost - - - - - -
Dairy Development 0.00
Cattle camp & Vaccination Camp, Artificial Insemination etc
6 nos C UG 1.80
Pasture Land Development 1 Ha. C UG 1.70
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
86
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
S. No. Names of Villages
Major activities of the SHGs
Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income from activity
per SHG
1 Bambhaniya
Cattle Feed 1 2.00 Dairy Equipment 1 2.00
Agro Centre 1 2.00 Vermi Compost to SHG 1 2.00
Vermi Compost Unit 1 2.00
2 Dudhala no 2
Agro Centre 1 2.00
Vermi Compost Unit 1 2.00 Dairy Equipment 1 1.00
Cattle Feed 1 2.00 Vermi Compost to SHG 1 2.00
3 Lusdi Net House 1 2.00
Agro Centre (Cattle Feed) 1 2.00 Vermi Compost to SHG 1 2.00
4 Gundrani
Agro Centre 1 2.00 Cattle Feed 1 2.00 Net House 1 2.00
Vermi Compost 1 2.00
5 Haripara Cattle Feed 1 2.00
Dairy Equipment 1 1.66 6 Visavadar Cattle feed 1 2.00
7 Dundas Agro Centre 1 2.00 Cattle Feed 1 2.00 Net House 1 2.00
8 Mota Piplava Cattle Feed 1 1.92 Net House 1 2.00
9 Kankot Cattle Feed 1 2.00 Handicraft 1 0.90
10 Nana Piplava Cattle Feed 1 2.00
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
87
11 Bildi
Agro Centre 1 2.00 Dairy Equipment 1 2.00
Handicraft 1 1.06 Net House 1 2
Table no.41: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
S. No. Name(s) of the
villages
CPR particulars Activity proposed
Target
Target area under the activity (ha)
Estimated expenditure (Rs.)
Expected no. of beneficiaries
Total for village - - - -
0 0 0 0 0 Total for project - - - - --
Table no. 42: Capacity Building Institution:
S. No. Name of the
Training Institute
Full Address with contact no.,
website & e-mail
Type of Institute#
Area(s) of speciali-zation$
Accredita-tion details
Trainings
Reference Year No. of
trainings assigned
No. of trainees to be
trained 1 Dsc Ahamadabad NGO Watershed - - - - 2 BISAG Gandhinagar Autonomous GIS - - - -
3 CSWCRTI Vasad Research Institutes
Soil and water
Conservation - - - -
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/
livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
88
Table no. 43: Capacity Building plan:
S. No. Project name
Project Stakeholders Total no. of
persons No. of persons to be
trained No. of training programmes
Estimated cost
1 IWMP - 18
PIA 2 2 3 0.20 WDTs 5 5 5 0.50
UGs 834 834 5 0.60 SHGs 373 373 5 0.75 WCs 121 121 3 0.53 GPs 0 0 0 0
Community 50 50 3 0.30 Others
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
1385 1385 24 2.88
Table no.44: Information, Education and Communication Activities:
S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.) Outcome
(may quantify, wherever possible) 1 Banners, Hoardings
DWDU Bhavnagar
0.83
Awareness for the importance of watershed project
2 Wall Painting at 3 community
Place 0.55
3 Pamphlets and Posters 0.10 4 Street Play (Bhavai) 0.24 5 Expoture Visit 0.29
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
89
Chapter 5
BUDGET
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
90
Table no. 45: Budget at a glance for the project Sl no Budget component Cost requirement
1 Administrative costs (10 %) 67.99 2 Monitoring & Evalution (2 %) 13.60
3 Entry Point activity (4 %) 27.19
4 Institution and Capacity Building (5 %) 33.99
5 Detailed Project Report (1 %) 6.80
6 Watershed Development Works (56 % ) 380.73
7 Livelihood activities for asset less (9 % ) 61.19
8 Production systems and micro-enterprises (10 % ) 67.99
9 Consolidation phase (3 %) 20.40
Total 679.872 Table no. 46: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP
Sl no
Village
Activity
EPA Institution and
CB DPR
Watershed development Work
Livelihood for asset less
Production system and
Microenterprises Consolidation Total
1 Bambhaniya 3.683 4.604 0.921 51.563 8.287 9.208 2.762 81.028
2 Dudhala No.2 3.166 3.958 0.792 44.325 7.124 7.915 2.375 69.655
3 Lusadi 3.003 3.754 0.751 42.040 6.756 7.507 2.252 66.063
4 Gundarani 3.884 4.855 0.971 54.372 8.738 9.709 2.913 85.442
5 Haripara 1.627 2.034 0.407 22.781 3.661 4.068 1.220 35.798
6 Visavadar 0.878 1.097 0.219 12.291 1.975 2.195 0.658 19.313
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
91
7 Dundas 3.815 4.768 0.954 53.404 8.583 9.536 2.861 83.921
8 Mota Pipalva 1.744 2.180 0.436 24.420 3.925 4.361 1.308 38.374
9 Kankot 1.290 1.613 0.323 18.063 2.903 3.226 0.968 28.386
10 Nana Pipalva 0.964 1.205 0.241 13.500 2.170 2.411 0.723 21.214
11 Bildi 3.141 3.926 0.785 43.969 7.066 7.852 2.355 69.094
Total 27.195 33.99 6.80 380.73 61.19 67.99 20.40 598.288
Table no. 47: Village wise gap in funds requirement Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under IWMP Gap in funds requirement
1 Bambhabiya 20.8 16.96 3.84
2 Dudhala No 2 12.35 9.95 2.4
3 Lusdi 9.4 6.4 3
4 Gundrani 26.45 21.65 4.8
5 Haripara 11.4 9.48 1.92
6 Visavadar 4.4 3.44 0.96
7 Dundas 17.7 14.82 2.88
8 Mota Piplava 11.6 9.68 1.92
9 Kankot 5.75 4.79 0.96
10 Nana Piplava 4.4 3.44 0.96
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
92
11 Bildi 11.6 9.68 1.92
Total 135.85 110.29 25.56
Table no. 48: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects
S. No.
Name of Private Sector
Partner Agency
Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership
Interventions Expected Outcomes
Comments a)MoU b)Contract
c) Any other (pl. specify)
IWMP Private sector
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
93
Chapter 6 OUTCOMES
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
94
6.1 Expected Outcomes
This project is a need based project which aims to increase the individual income, to generate self employment and to increase the agricultural
productivity in the Eleven project villages of Gundarni block under the IWMP. This project will be focused on multi approach activities which create an
employment opportunity in their native villages for sustaining their income and check the migration, which became a key to defeat the present
problems. Project will not only focus on create employment opportunity but also it focus on the sustainable use of natural resources by using latest
appropriate technology and strengthening the local leaders through capacity building and training, which ultimately ensure the sustainable livelihood
of the people of the project Village. The detail expected outcome are detailed below.
Table no.49: Environmental Benefits
Sr. No.
Village
Soil loss (cmt) Water storage
(Cmt) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover
Pre-project
Expected post-
project
Pre-project
Expected post-
project
Open well: pre-
project
Open well: post-
project
Bore well: pre-
project
Bore well: post-
project
Area in Ha.: pre-
project
Area in Ha.: post-
project
Tree count: pre-
project
Tree count: post-
project
1 Bambhabiya
5 to 10 2 to 4
0 50000 15 11 60 55 NA NA NA NA
2 Dudhala No 2 0 60000 16 9 60 54 NA NA NA NA
3 Lusdi
0 40000 15 10 55 53 NA NA NA NA
4 Gundrani 0 60000 18 12 75 72 NA NA NA NA
5 Haripara 0 45000 17 13 75 70 NA NA NA NA
6 Visavadar
0 40000 16 11 75 71 NA NA NA NA
7 Dundas 0 55000 17 12 65 60 NA NA NA NA
8 Mota Piplava
0 50000 15 11 60 55 NA NA NA NA
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
95
9 Kankot
0 60000 16 9 60 54 NA NA NA NA
10 Nana Piplava 0 40000 15 10 55 53 NA NA NA NA
11 Bildi 0 60000 18 12 75 72 NA NA NA NA
6.1.1: Drinking water
The villages in the project area totally depend upon hand pump and well for drinking and other domestic activities but the availability of water is only
10 months at maximum. The activities of watershed and the linkage with the WASMO will increase the ground water table so that the expected status
of drinking water will increase. Comparative status of drinking water between pre-project and expected post project are furnished as under.
Table no. 50: Status of Drinking water S.
No. Names of Villages
Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year) Quality of drinking water Comments
Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project
1 Bambhabiya
10 12 Brackish Potable
-
2 Dudhala No 2 10 12 Brackish Potable -
3 Lusdi 10 12 Brackish Potable -
4 Gundrani
10 12 Brackish Potable
-
5 Haripara 10 12 Brackish Potable -
6 Visavadar 10 12 Brackish Potable -
7 Dundas
10 12 Brackish Potable
-
8 Mota Piplava 10 12 Brackish Potable -
9 Kankot 10 12 Brackish Potable -
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
96
10 Nana Piplava
10 12 Brackish Potable
-
11 Bildi 10 12 Brackish Potable -
6.1.2: Expected Crops Yield.
Due to additional availability of water farmers of the project area will be able to crops in their available land during winter seasons. Even after taking
rainy season and post-rainy season crops into consideration, they will get a good price for vegetables in summer also. The productivity will also
increase due to the use of updated techniques.
Table no. 51: Crop area and yield in the project area
Sr. No.
Name of village
Name of crops
Pre-project Expected Post-project
Area (ha) Production in
Kg Average Yield
(kg) per ha. Area (ha)
Production in Kg
Average Yield per ha (kg)
1 Bambhaniya
Kharif
Cotton 478 717000 1500 502 903600 1800
Ground Nut 68 85000 1250 71 106500 1500
Bajri 137 308250 2250 144 388800 2700
Rabi
Onion 39 853125 21875 42 1102500 26250
Wheat 26 65000 2500 28 84000 3000
2 Dudhala No. 2 Kharif
Cotton 401 601500 1500 420 756000 1800
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
97
Ground Nut 57 71250 1250 60 90000 1500
Bajri 115 258750 2250 121 326700 2700
Rabi
Onion 57 1246875 21875 61 1601250 26250
Wheat 38 95000 2500 41 123000 3000
3 Lusdi
Kharif
Cotton 368 552000 1500 386 694800 1800
Ground Nut 53 66250 1250 56 84000 1500
Bajri 105.4 237150 2250 111 299700 2700
Rabi
Onion 6 131250 21875 7 183750 26250
Wheat 4 10000 2500 5 15000 3000
4 Gundrani
Kharif
Cotton 506 759000 1500 531 955800 1800
Ground Nut 72 90000 1250 75 112500 1500
Bajri 145 326250 2250 152 410400 2700
Rabi
Onion 15.6 341250 21875 18 472500 26250
Wheat 10.4 26000 2500 12 36000 3000
5 Haripara Kharif
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
98
Cotton 205 307500 1500 215 387000 1800
Ground Nut 29 36250 1250 30 45000 1500
Bajri 58.5 131625 2250 61 164700 2700
Rabi
Onion 13.5 295313 21875 15 393750 26250
Wheat 9 22500 2500 11 33000 3000
6 Visavadar
Kharif
Cotton 97 145500 1500 102 183600 1800
Ground Nut 14 17500 1250 15 22500 1500
Bajri 27.7 62325 2250 30 81000 2700
Rabi
Onion 2.4 52500 21875 4 105000 26250
Wheat 1.6 4000 2500 2 6000 3000
7 Dundas
Kharif
Cotton 482 723000 1500 506 910800 1800
Ground Nut 69 86250 1250 72 108000 1500
Bajri 138.1 310725 2250 145 391500 2700
Rabi
Onion 1.8 39375 21875 3 78750 26250
Wheat 1.2 3000 2500 3 9000 3000
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
99
8 Mota Piplava
Kharif
Cotton 206 309000 1500 216 388800 1800
Ground Nut 29 36250 1250 30 45000 1500
Bajri 59 132750 2250 61 164700 2700
Rabi
Onion 1.2 26250 21875 3 78750 26250
Wheat 0.8 2000 2500 2 6000 3000
9 Kankot
Kharif
Cotton 167 250500 1500 175 315000 1800
Ground Nut 24 30000 1250 25 37500 1500
Bajri 48 108000 2250 50 135000 2700
Rabi
Onion 3 65625 21875 5 131250 26250
Wheat 2 5000 2500 3 9000 3000
10 Nana Piplava
Kharif
Cotton 118 177000 1500 123 221400 1800
Ground Nut 17 21250 1250 17 25500 1500
Bajri 34 76500 2250 36 97200 2700
Rabi
Onion 1.8 39375 21875 3 78750 26250
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
100
Wheat 1.2 3000 2500 2 6000 3000
11 Bildi
Kharif
Cotton 425 637500 1500 446 802800 1800
Ground Nut 61 76250 1250 64 96000 1500
Bajri 120.9 272025 2250 126 340200 2700
Rabi
Onion 158.4 3465000 21875 167 4383750 26250
Wheat 105.6 264000 2500 111 333000 3000
6.1.3: Horticulture
The below table shows the area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP-18. The detail village wise description is given as under.
Table no. 52: Area under horticulture / other crops S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the crop Area post project
1 Bambhabiya
Mango, Chikoo, Lemon, Papita etc....
0.0 1.00
2 Dudhala No 2
0.0 2.00
3 Lusdi
0.0 1.00
4 Gundrani 0.0 3.00
5 Haripara
0.0 1.00
6 Visavadar 0.0 1.00
7 Dundas 0.0 3.00
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
101
8 Mota Piplava
0.0 2.00
9 Kankot 0.0 1.00
10 Nana Piplava 0.0 1.00
11 Bildi
0.0 2.00
6.1.4 Livestock
Table 58 gives the details of livestock in the project villages of the project IWMP-8. The livestock details are given as per the baseline survey. Milch-
animals include cow and buffalo in the project area. Productivity of the cow is 1-2 liters per day where as the buffalo give 2- 3 litter of milk per day.
Table no. 53: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
Sr. No. Name of Village
Type of Animal Pre-Project Expected Post-project
No. Yield Income No. Yield Income
1 Bambhaniya
Milch-animals 592 3436 1.37 592 3608 1.44
Draught Purpose animals 42 0 0 42 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 199 0 0 199 0 0.00
Total 833 3436 1.37 833 3608 1.44
2 Dudhala No. 2
Milch-animals 475 2537 1.01 475 2664 1.07
Draught Purpose animals 44 0 0 44 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 2460 0 0 2460 0 0.00
Total 2979 2537 1.01 2979 2664 1.07
3 Lusdi Milch-animals 326 1671 0.67 326 1755 0.70
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
102
Draught Purpose animals 33 0 0 33 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 80 0 0 80 0 0.00
Total 439 1671 0.67 439 1755 0.70
4 Gundrani
Milch-animals 532 3313 1.33 532 3479 1.39
Draught Purpose animals 42 0 0 42 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 2022 0 0 2022 0 0.00
Total 2596 3313 1.33 2596 3479 1.39
5 Haripara
Milch-animals 115 681 0.27 115 715 0.29
Draught Purpose animals 8 0 0 8 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 45 0 0 45 0 0.00
Total 168 681 0.27 168 715 0.29
6 Visavadar
Milch-animals 46 360 0.14 46 378 0.15
Draught Purpose animals 16 0 0 16 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 40 0 0 40 0 0.00
Total 102 360 0.14 102 378 0.15
7 Dundas
Milch-animals 724 3965 1.59 724 4163 1.67
Draught Purpose animals 66 0 0 66 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 290 0 0 290 0 0.00
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
103
Total 1080 3965 1.59 1080 4163 1.67
8 Mota Piplva
Milch-animals 257 1027 0.41 257 1078 0.43
Draught Purpose animals 12 0 0 12 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 124 0 0 124 0 0.00
Total 393 1027 0.41 393 1078 0.43
9 Kankot
Milch-animals 62 486 0.19 62 510 0.20
Draught Purpose animals 12 0 0 12 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 60 0 0 60 0 0.00
Total 134 486 0.19 134 510 0.20
10 Nana Piplava
Milch-animals 110 551 0.22 110 579 0.23
Draught Purpose animals 8 0 0 8 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 56 0 0 56 0 0.00
Total 174 551 0.22 174 579 0.23
11 Bildi
Milch-animals 465 2398 0.96 465 2518 1.01
Draught Purpose animals 62 0 0 62 0 0.00
Animals for other purpose 1371 0 0 1371 0 0.00
Total 1898 2398 0.96 1898 2518 1.01
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
104
6.1.5: Employment
This programme also aims simultaneously to improve the living conditions of the people. Employment opportunities will be generated for the people
through different soil and water conservation activities and livelihood activities. Self employment would be created by providing the people with cash
support in the form of direct livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.
Table no. 54: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area:
S. NO.
Names of Villages
Wage employment Self employment
No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total
1 Bambhabiya 1500 0 8812 3500 10312 10 0 58 23 68 6 0 35 13 41
2 Dudhala No 2 4100 0 4765 2383 8865 27 0 31 15 58 16 0 18 9 34
3 Lusdi 4800 0 3608 1804 8408 32 0 24 12 56 19 0 14 7 33
4 Gundrani 3900 0 6974 3487 10874 26 0 46 23 72 15 0 27 13 42
5 Haripara 1200 0 3356 1678 4556 8 0 22 11 30 5 0 13 6 18
6 Visavadar 500 0 1958 900 2458 4 0 13 6 17 2 0 8 3 10
7 Dundas 5500 0 5180 2590 10680 36 0 34 17 70 21 0 20 10 41
8 Mota Piplava 1000 0 3884 1942 4884 6 0 25 12 31 3 0 15 7 18
9 Kankot 1700 0 1912 956 3612 11 0 12 6 23 6 0 7 3 13
10 Nana Piplava 800 0 1900 950 2700 5 0 12 6 17 3 0 7 3 10
11 Bildi 5600 0 3193 1596 8793 37 0 21 10 58 22 0 12 6 34
30600 0 45542 21786 76142 202 0 298 141 500 118 0 176 80 294
6.1.6 Expected Migration Checked
Watershed development works can -
Generate new opportunities in local area through the physical treatments of the watershed activities,
Increase the production of agriculture produces through adopting updated/ new techniques,
Hence the Watershed development increased demands for labour. This will lead to decrease in the number of seasonal migration from the area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
105
Table no. 55: Seasonal migration from Project area
Sl. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating
No. of days per year of migration
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 Bambhabiya 278 167 186 60
2 Dudhala No 2 216 130 144 60
3 Lusdi 221 133 149 60
4 Gundrani 160 96 108 60
5 Haripara 115 69 77 60
6 Visavadar 122 74 82 60
7 Dundas 205 123 138 60
8 Mota Piplava 172 104 121 60
9 Kankot 66 40 45 60
10 Nana Piplava 110 66 73 60
11 Bildi 123 74 83 60
Total 1788 1076 1206
660
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
106
Table no.56: Per capital Income
Sr. No. Project name Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project
1 IWMP-18
Agriculture 13460 14580
Forestry 000 000
Animal Husbandry 4749 5200
Casual Labour 3691
4200
Others 2414 2680
Total 24314 26660
6.1.7 Backward-Forward linkages
The sustainable livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver the
desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. The details are given as under.
Table no. 57: Backward-Forward linkages S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)
1 IWMP
18
Backward linkages 0 0 0 Seed certification 0 0 0 Seed supply system 0 0 0 Fertilizer supply system 0 0 0 Pesticide supply system 0 0 0 Credit institutions 0 0 0 Water supply 0 0 0 Extension services 0 KVK, NGO KVK, NGO Nurseries 0 Yes Yes Tools/machinery suppliers 0 Yes Yes Price Support system 0 0 0 Labour 0 0 0
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
107
Any other (please specify) (Organic manuare) 0 Vermi compost Vermi compost Forward linkages 0 0 0 Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 0 0 Storage (including cold storage) 0 0 0 Road network 0 0 0 Transport facilities 0 0 0 Markets / Mandis 0 0 0 Agro and other Industries 0 0 0 Milk and other collection centres 0 0 0 Labour 0 0 0 Any other (please specify) 0 0 0
6.2 Logical Frame Work Analysis
Logical Frame Work Analysis (LFA) describes the project goal, objectives, and the activities which will help to achieve the objective. This frame also
gives expected results, performance variable indictors, mean of verification and the risk and assumptions of the project. The monitoring team and
evaluation team should follow the frame for the achievements. Natural disaster, political intervention and pre-conception of the local people may
become obstacle in front the success of the project. It was found that, Person of this area believes that the work related to the bamboo handi-craft
lower the social status in the society. Hence after the training of the handi-craft, the people are not using the skill for the betterment.
The means of the verification will help the monitoring team to verify the things where as the performance variable indicators are the indicators of the
project which shows the success or failure.
Table no. 58 PROJECT STRATEGY
Sr no
PROJECT STRATEGY (Goals, Objectives, Purpose, Activities, outcomes/outputs)
OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE INDICATORS(OVI)
MEANS OF VERIFICATION(MOV) ASSUMPTIONS/RISKS/CHALLENGES
Goals
1
Restoring ecological balance and
Promote appropriate technologies for efficient and sustainable use of rainwater
Identify high-quality natural features, map them, and include them in planning documents.
Social and political stability No major environmental
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
108
increasing productivity in such region necessitate
undertaking all developmental
activities
Conservation of soil and improve the
land productivity Regenerate the vegetation cover on
denuded wastelands, promote tree based
farming systems and sustainable agriculture
Improve Livestock Productivity Identify and protect greenway
corridors.
Improvement in vegetative cover. Increase ground water table in the
well and irrigated area. Better agricultural yields. Increase per capita income of
local people by wage employment and self employment.
Work available within the village
and therefore no need for migration
catastrophes (e.g. drought, earthquake etc)
Absence of conflicts in project
area
2
Ensure sustainable growth and
development.
Bring the underprivileged sections of society in to the mainstream
Equip rural communities for sustainable
management of the natural resources. Backward and Forward linkages Building community organisations
Proper maintained and care taking of the physical assets
Desired participation of people
Self reliant through livelihood
Willingness of villagers to work together for future
Normal trend of population growth
Objectives
1 Rainfed Area Development
Soil and water Conservation
Increase vegetative cover of the project area.
Increase in water availability in the project area
Physical verification by site visit.
Satellite imagery (GIS) of the project area.
Asset registration at
Grampanchayat.
Site selection is accurate. All the activity will give the best
results
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
109
Decrease in soil erosion, run off, and silt
load.
Waste and pasture land development
Afforastation and Plantation.
Local people’s view.
Measurement Book
2 Creation of new
livelihood opportunities
Wage employment generation through Physical structure work.
Self employment through SHG activity link up with bankable project.
Livelihood activity as per the local
people’s competency. Production system and Micro enterprise
activity for value addition
No of SHG formation and link up with bankable project.
Mandays Generate through
Physical work. Mitigation of migration
All work through man power and minimum utilization of machine.
3 Effective
management and budgetary control.
Maintained Accountability of the fund Efficient site selection Local People’s contribution
Proper utilization of available fund. Maintenance of accounts and records by
the villagers themselves.
Cost Benefit ratio calculation
Internal rate of return(IRR) Fund available from convergence.
Watershed Development Fund
All activity will give efficient result.
4 Backward and
forward linkages
Link up facilities of agri-input like hybrid seed, pesticide, and fertilizer.
Extension services through capacity building.
Increase facilities for agri-input and agri-output.
Increase income from agriculture.
Climatic condition is favourable for agriculture
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
110
Market link up by value addition of agri-
output. Micro enterprise activity for value
addition.
5
Women’s Socio-political and
economic empowerment
Women along with men are taking part in community level decision making process.
Self Help Groups of men and women
both.
Adequate representation of women, different
Efforts are taken to build the capacity of women
leads to active participation of women in the watershed development projects
Linking SHGs with external financial institutions
Improved access to credit for
livelihood purposes.
Success story of the SHG activity.
No internal conflict will rise. Everyone participate positively.
Purposes
1
Participation various sections of the
watershed community
75 percent of the women and the weaker section(SC/ST, landless) attending meetings and voicing their thoughts
Effective Net panning
Socio-economic survey Gramshabha UGs and SHGs Village Watershed Committee.
Favourable socio-cultural conditions at the village
2 Increase in living standard of the
people.
Increase new Livelihood opportunities for assetless and resource poor.
Increase income through new practices
of agricultural activity. Social statues
Increase in per capita income. Reduce migration rate. Socio-economic survey
Smooth flow of funds
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
111
Increase in purchasing capacity of the
villagers, particularly the poor.
3
Capacity building of community
organization specially of the women and the weaker sections
50 per cent of the households, particularly the weaker section, should be members of either Self Help Groups or User Groups.
Need assessment Crucial component for achieving the
desired results. Well prepared training modules and
reading materials
Annual Action Plan for Capacity Building
Mechanism for effective
monitoring and follow-up.
More no of participation in the capacity building programme.
Activities
1 Community mobilisation
programmes like immunization, eradicating illiteracy; empowerment of the weak and the underprivileged, creating self managed institutions of the poor etc.
To create sustained behavioral change that will bring about community participation for sustainability and self-reliance.
Social Mobilization is the process of pooling together, harnessing, actualizing and utilizing potential human resources for the purpose of development.
organizing the target groups to take
No of SHGs and UGs formed
People participation in decision making process.
Social Audit.
Gramshabha
Success story
Religion conflict
Communal related opposition
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
112
initiatives and assert themselves
Social Mobilization as a means for Human Resource Development
To create equalities among the various communities
Identification of their needs and problems
2 Formation of village level organisations
Each village has Village watershed committee (VWC).
Formation of Watershed Committee,
User Group Number of User group depending on the
coverage of particular intervention
Registration of VWC Unity and prosperity in the
village management.
3 Water harvesting
works
Ridge to valley approach Ridge area and Drainage line treatment Maps (Cadastral map, Drainage and
water bodies, Contour Map) Appropriate Site selection and structure
selection.
Final Action Plan Map Physical verification GIS imagery Local people’s view Measurement Book
Encroachment Internal conflict Local Political involvement
4 Vegetative
improvement work
Affoastation and Agroforestry Crop Demonstration New Agricultural Practises
Final Action Plan Map GIS imagery
Success ratio of plantation is 100 percentages.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
113
outcomes/outputs
1 Increase soil
moisture index
Soil and water conservation activities Ground water recharge. Engineering structure for surface
irrigation
Soil sample testing Improvement in Irrigated land
Soil condition is batter
2 Increase in crop
production
Productivity enhancement through new agricultural practices.
Crop Demonstration
Inter and multi cropping system
Improvement in farm mechanisation
High nutritional value traditional crops should not be totally replaced by high yielding varieties.
Selection of high productive native
species over exotic species.
Use of bio-compost, organic mulch (Green manure) and vermi-compost will result in lesser use of permissible chemical fertilizers and pesticides
Productivity improvement Change in cropping pattern
Enough Rain fall will fall in the project area.
3 Increase in water availability in the watershed area
New sources of drinking water Repairing and renovation of existing
drinking water facilities Regular disinfections by chlorination
Ground water table Water sample testing
Rainfall is enough to meet daily water need of project area.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
114
and use of filters will reduce chances of water borne diseases.
4 Increase in fuel and fodder availability
Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder
Reduction in drudgery of fodder
collection especially women Pasture land and wasteland will be
developed. Quantity of fodder saved/consumed.
Decrease in Migration due to fodder unavailability.
Livestock growth is normal
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
115
Chapter 7 QUALITY AND SUSTAILABILITY OF THE PROJECT
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
116
Introduction: Chapter-7 deals with the plan in which the activities of watershed IWMP 18 Project of Bhavnagr maintain the quality and renders the
project sustainable. In details the chapter describes that the proper and regular monitoring and evaluation of the project can trimming down the
improper implementation of activities so that the quality can be controlled at the right time. The chapter extends with the appropriate post-project
techniques for project sustainability and research and documentation for maintaining the records, locate the loop falls in implementing and follow up
the project with a new and suitable adaptation for the area development.
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation:
To control the activities at the stage of implementing proper plans has formed for monitoring and Evaluation. Project monitoring is one of the
important components in watershed development programmes. The broad objectives of a watershed project demand good monitoring framework. A
monitoring framework is suggested which within the capacity of watershed development teams and watershed committees. No great deal of training,
human resources or instruments are expected to be employed. The monitoring should actually assist the project team to provide a guideline for
improvement in the activities and output the project. Selection of an appropriate measure for the given area and ensuring the quality of project
measures to be given great attention at the time of monitoring.
7.1.1 Three Ties of Monitoring: Three tiers of monitoring are planned –
First Tire (Monitoring of activities):
This is carried out by the head of local PO’s along with part time workers to monitor the implementation of all activities as per the action plan.
The monitoring also aims at ensuring that the quality of work is as per the guidelines prescribed for each activity.
Second Tire (Monitoring of outputs):
To check the outputs of the activities, project coordinators along with the part time workers monitors as per the logical frame work. The
indicators are selected considering the broad objectives of the project. One can adopt or modify these as per requirement at the time of
implementation. The output level indicators needs to be devised by the project team based on the outcome level indicators on. Outputs need to be
monitored frequently, may be once in a quarter/ six months.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
117
Third Tire (Monitoring of Outcomes):
Project reviewing committee along with the project co-coordinator will monitor the overall outcomes of the objectives as per the log frame. The
outcomes level monitoring may start in the second year and continue on an annual basis. Most of the information can be available from the sets of
output level indicators. Participatory methods should be used at the time of monitoring the activities.
The methods of collecting samples data for the monitoring activities should be clearly documented in the monitoring report. The detail of the
monitoring system is presented in the table as under.
Table no 59. Details of Monitoring system proposed for the project
Tiers of Monitoring
Basis of monitoring
Frequency of monitoring Orientation of the
Indicator Monitoring by
First tier Immediate result
basis Regular Monthly Monitoring Activity oriented Local People organizations
Second Tier Monitoring of
Outputs
Regular monitoring (Quarterly, half yearly and
annually ) Objective oriented
Internal project team (WDT, PIA, MDT, Experts and PM)
Third Tier Monitoring of
Outcomes Annually but monitoring start
from second year onwards? Goal Oriented
1. Specified monitoring team formed by DWDU, 2. External Monitoring team by GSWMA
Apart from the above mentioned monitoring system, there are a Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the
project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the
project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one
particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number
wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up
the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know
areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The
system would also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
118
evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the
planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.
Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias
WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official in charge of the
project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The
WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are
then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by
the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent
periods of time.
7.1.2 Evaluation:
The project will be evaluated by the external agency after the project completion to see the impact of the project in the area. The external
agency should use the monitoring tool specified in the DPR of the project and should consider the assumptions and risk mentioned in the DPR because
these are the factors which may be an obstacle in the implementation of the project. The agency will be decided by the State Nodal Agency (GSWMA) at
the time of the evaluation. The evaluation will be evaluate that the goal is achieved or not after the implementation of the project.
7.2 Plans for Post-Project Management/Sustainability Approach:
Watershed development project can be rendered sustainable through an appropriate combination of environmental balance, community
participation and institutionalization of process. So the detail plans for the post project management are described as under:
7.2.1 Adopting Environment friendly conservation measures
The measures taken up will be long lasting. Along with engineering measures, efforts will also be made to establish forest cover in the upper
catchment areas and on the slopes. The downstream area will have prolonged stream flows. The stream banks should also be vegetated to create a
buffer between land and water bodies. Such vegetation helps in stabilizing streams, enhancing recharge and improving the riparian habitat.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
119
An including species of trees and grasses will be selected for developing a vegetative cover at the time of implementation of IWMP 7 project of
Panchmahal. The diversity of vegetative measures is the key to sustainability. Combination of shallow and deep-rooted plants, fast and slow growing
plants, productive and medical plants and herbs will be encouraged. The vegetation created will ultimately help to recharge the rainwater, use the soil
moisture optimally and provide direct and indirect benefits to the community and environment as a whole.
Land use pattern will go hand in hand with carrying capacity of the watershed. Optimum use of water and increased use of organic fertilizers is
the key to conserve the precious land source. Water overuse and excessive fertilization leads to permanent damage of lands and groundwater.
It is important to maintain soil quality through crop management. Crop diversity and crop rotation helps in improving the micro flora and
fauna present in the soil and maintaining the healthy symbiotic subsystems relationship.
7.2.2 Participation of local community in development and management
During the planning phase the local people’s participation were involved and it is planned that the involvement during implementation and
post project maintenance will enhance the impact of project and maintain the structures. However, participation without empowerment does not help
in achieving sustainable development. So People will be made aware of different concepts and options for their livelihood and natural resource
management. Local wisdom is important in understanding rural dynamics that includes the interface between human behavior and its economic /
ecological implications. The interests of a community will be created and maintained by adopting the measures in such a manner that they provide
immediate, medium term and long term benefits to the community.
7.2.3 Institutionalization for post project management
A dynamic institutional arrangement is necessary for project management, facilitation of benefit sharing and maintenance of the resources.
This usually includes small user groups for different resources / assets as well as village level organizations. In-built system and mechanisms will be
developed for qualitative growth and dynamisms of the organizations. The community organizations should be linked to other Government and Non
Government institutes of interest. The potential people’s organizations were formed in the project area include Watershed level Organization and
Users Groups.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
120
Watershed level Committee
Watershed level organization is established right from the beginning of the project. The overall planning, coordination, management and
maintenance are possible through this representative body. This clearly implies representation from different sections of the community –
landholders and landless, upper reach and lower reach, men and women, lower and upper castes, Gram Panchayat and other existing political or non
political organizations.
User Groups
The other categories of institutions are formed of various groups with common areas of interest in the project area named user groups. These
include, depending upon necessity, Self Help Groups of women and men, User Groups for common assets, Natural Clubs, etc. The capacities of different
groups will be developed time to time for effective functioning of these groups. A mechanism will be developed to ensure continuity, both in learning,
functioning and actions that from responsibilities of such groups during the implementation project activities.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
121
Chapter 8
Maps
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
122
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
123
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
124
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
125
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
126
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
127
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
128
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
129
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
130
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
131
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
132
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
133
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
134
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
135
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
136
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
137
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
138
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
139
Annexure
Modals
Production System: Agro cell cum selling unit for Agri-inputs (seeds, fertilizers and pesticides)
Introduction
Farming is main occupation in the project area as more than fifty percent household is dependent on it (As per baseline survey). Seed, fertilizer and
pesticide are the basic inputs of the agriculture. The basic purpose of the application of good quality agri-input is to enhance the crop productivity.
Without quality seed and fertilizer; farmer cannot get better productivity. So income of the farmer is directly depended on the availability of the
quality agri-input. The idea comes from the need of the agri input in the project area. Now a day there is no any big agro store to reach local farmer’s
needs and also small agro stores are selling agri-input at comparative much higher than the market price.
Agro cell provides all agro inputs (like seeds, fertilizers and pesticides) under one roof, with quality assurance, timely supply and reasonable prices. Its
focuses on selling agri-input of improved varieties and quality accessible to remote farmers with low purchasing power, as well as engaging them in a
continuous feedback loop to shape demand identification. Organic products as well as conventional products are offered. Organic products include a
range of innovative organic inputs from various organic manure and pesticides. Agro cell is linkup with various branded and quality assured
commercial agri-input with the local requirement of the project area as per the cropping pattern. An agro cell business will develop its own channels
of distribution and marketing campaigns. So agro cell will make these important crop production inputs available to more farmers.
Objectives
For sustained agricultural growth and to promote balanced nutrient application, it is imperative that agri-inputs are made available to farmers at
affordable prices. With this objective, Agro cell plans to start in the project area. This means improving farming methods, by selling new verities of
seed, good quality of fertilizer, pesticide and maintaining fertility of the soil and at the same time ensuring farmers’ profitability by input marketing.
Focus is on small and marginal farmers in the project areas.
1. Improve availability of seed, pesticide and fertilizer to the farmers
2. Getting seed, pesticide and fertilizer at the cheaper rate.
3. Productivity enhancement through better quality of seed and fertilizer.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
140
4. Improvement in the income of the farmer by increasing productivity.
Preliminary problems
The enterprise of agriculture is subject to a great many uncertainties. Yet, more people in village earn their livelihood from farming, than from all
other activity put together. There are many risk factor affected to the agricultural activity. It is essential that the different sources of risk that affect
agro cell are classified.
1, Agricultural risk is associated with negative outcomes that stem from imperfectly predictable biological, climatic, and price variables.
2, Unlike most other entrepreneurs, farmers are not able to predict with certainty the amount of output that the production process will yield due to
external factors such as weather, pests, and diseases. So uncertainty in demand of the agri-inputs.
3, Input and output price volatility is important source of market risk in agriculture. Prices of agri-inputs are extremely volatile.
4, As farmers must anticipate expenses that they will only be able to recuperate once the product is marketed. This leads to potential cash flow
problems exacerbated by lack of access to insurance services, credit and the high cost of borrowing. These problems can be classified as financial risk.
5, There is thus a significant gap between the supply side and demand side of the agri value chain.
Project Feasibility of Agro cell
We believe that this project is feasible from a social, economical, and environmental point of view.
(A) Social Feasibility
Agriculture productivity improvement is directly link to Income this is affected the standard of living of the local people. It also related with social
status. Farmer’s whole community can be linked up by single outlet for agri-input. These will improve better understanding of the community. And
people participatory can make it more successful.
(B) Economical Feasibility
The economy of Village is mostly depended on the agriculture. As better income from agriculture output can always provide good economical support
to the farmer. This is improving the livelihood of the local people directly (Farmers) and indirectly (agriculture labour). It has manifold contribution to
economic development. Agro cell, playing a pivotal role in rural industrialisation, provides significant and long-term development stimulus to rural
population.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
141
(C) Environmental Feasibility
Farming is a totally eco-friendly activity which not harms to environment or do not create pollution. Our main focus is selling more organic input than
chemical base. So it is fully environmentally feasible production system
Value Addition in Agri-inputs
This enables procedures to keep customers (farmers) and ultimately obtain more profits. Agro cell can add value to input by:
Timely delivery of inputs.
Transport of inputs to deficit area.
Product differentiation (production of certified inputs, quality declared inputs etc.).
Supportive information on characteristics of improved input varieties, regular training and coaching of customers/farmers, public
demonstrations.
Customer oriented product packaging.
Cost Model for an Agro cell system Sl no Particular
A Fixed investment for agro cell model (Including Agri-input cost and infrastructure cost ) 1.85 Rs
Total annual Recurring Expenses(Including transportation, salary and miscellaneous expenses) 0.15 Rs
C Annual gross income (including sell of Agri-Inputs) 3.50 Rs
D Net annual income for first year 1.50 Rs
Opportunities for Agro cell
Business opportunity is found in buyer’s needs and interests; specially, where there is a high probability that a individual can profit by satisfying those
needs and interests. Agri-inputs demands can be put in the following categories:
1. Agri-Input demand due to seed shortages at planting. There is a regular seed demand as result of inadequate seed stocks. It is very common for
most resource-poor farmers to run short of agri-inputs. There is also an irregular demand due to acute agri-inputs situations, such as drought
or floods.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
142
2. Demand for new agri-inputs varieties to respond to emerging agri-input markets.
3. Improved agri-input varieties with improved agri-input quality to increase productivity and profits.
Technical Support
To keep track of the latest developments Agro cell has to manage good contacts and links with government, research and educational institutes,
sharing knowledge and expertise:
Agricultural Universities
District Agricultural Department
KVK (Krushi Vikas Kendra)- Chotila
AKRSP-I
DSC Bopal
Private organisations
Advantages of the Agro cell
Agro cell is the connecting link between the Morden agro industry and the farmer. It may be played crucial role for the agricultural development by
improving productivity. As quality agri-inputs can increases the agricultural productivity. Any increase in production in a sector induces a larger
demand for inputs from its input supplying sectors and also enables it to provide larger input supply to other producing sectors. The former type of
inter-linkages is called backward linkage. Agro cell is the best example of the backward linkages. Conversely, agro cell can open up new opportunities
to farmers, and thus, create additional revenues for them.
Benefits from Agro cell:
Timely provide agri-input to farmer by available at project area.
Provide both quantum and quality of agri-inputs.
Reduced agri-input costs by economy of scale.
Enhance crop productivity by new varieties of seed, good quality of fertilizer and pesticide
Increased farmer income
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
143
Premium prices for crops production
Increased soil fertility by organic fertilizer
Increased level of farmer skill and activity
Adoption of modern agricultural practices
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
144
Production system: Vermi-composting unit
Introduction
There is a growing realization that vermi-composting provides the nutrients and growth enhancing hormones necessary for plant growth. The fruits,
flowers and vegetables and other plant products grown using vermi-compost are reported to have better keeping quality. A growing number of
individuals and institutions are taking interest in the production of compost utilizing earthworm activity. Some of them ventured into commercial
production as well. As the cost of production of this compost works out to about Rs.1.5 per kg, it is quite profitable to sell the compost even at Rs.2.50
per kg. Other organic manures like neem cake, groundnut cake, etc., are sold around this price.
The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1.5 m wide and 0.9
m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at
about 40 - 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 - 30o C by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume
the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients is rich manure for the
plants.
When the commercial scale production is aimed at in addition to the cost of production, considerable amount has to be invested initially on capital
items. The capital cost may work out to about Rs.1500 to Rs.2500 for every tonne of compost produced annually. The high variability in the unit
capital cost is due to the fact that large units require considerable expenditure on machinery and transport particularly when the source of raw
materials is away from the site of production facility and the finished product has to be transported to far off places before being marketed. However,
in most of the cases, the activity is viable and bankable. Following are the items required to be considered while setting up a unit for production of
vermi-compos.
About the Worms
Of about 350 species of earth worms in India with various food and burrowing habits, Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, Perionyx excavatius are some
of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
145
garbage and vermicomposting units are ideally suited to locations / units with generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One
earthworm reaching reproductive age of about six weeks lays one egg capsule (containing 7 embryoes) every 7 - 10 days. Three to seven worms
emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum growth conditions is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully
grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make 'worm meal' which is a rich source of protein (70%) for use in animal feed.
USE
As the wastes are pulverised as they pass through the worm, the surface area of the material increases which in turn helps as base for nutrients.
Vermicompost, apart from supplying nutrients and growth enhancing harmones to plants, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and
nutrient holding capacities of soil. Chemical fertilizer in moderate doses can go along with vermicoposting.
COMPONENTS OF A COMMERCIAL UNIT
Sheds
For a vermi-composting unit, whether small or big, this is an essential item and is required for having the vermi beds. They could be of thatched roof
supported by bamboo rafters and purlins, wooden trusses and stone pillars. If the size is so chosen as to prevent wetting of beds due to rain on a
windy day, they could be open sheds. While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labour
attending to the filling and harvesting the beds.
Vermi-beds
Normally the beds are 75 cm - 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The entire bed area could be above the
ground. Care should be taken to make the bed with uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low
bed volumes. The bed width should not be more that 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed.
Land
About 0.5-1 acre of land will be needed to set up a vermiculture production cum extension centre. The centre will have at least 8-10 sheds each of
about 180-200 sq.ft. It should also have a bore well, and pump set or watering arrangement and other equipments as described in the scheme
economics. The land can be taken on lease of at least 10-15 years. Even sub marginal land also will serve the purpose.
Buildings
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
146
When the activity is taken up on a large scale on commercial lines, considerable amount may have to be spent on buildings to house the office, store
the raw material and finished product, provide minimum accommodation to the Manager and workers. The cost of the buildings along with the
electrification of these buildings and the vermi-sheds may be included under this item.
Seed Stock
This is an important item requiring considerable investment. Though the worms multiply fast to give the required numbers over a period of 6 months
to a year, it may not be wise to wait till such a time having invested on the infrastructure heavily. Thus, worms @ 350 worms per m3 of bed space
should be adequate to start with and to build up the required population in about two cycles or three without unduly affecting the estimated
production.
Fencing and Roads/Paths
The site area needs development for construction of structures and development of roads and pathways for easy movement of hand-drawn
trolleys/wheel barrows for conveying the raw material and the finished products to and from the vermi-sheds. The entire area has to be fenced to
prevent trespass by animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the length of the periphery of the farm and the length
and type of roads/paths required. The costs on fencing and formation of roads should be kept low as these investments are essential for a production
unit, yet would not lead to increase in production.
Water Supply System
As the beds have always to be kept moist with about 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of
conveying and applying the water to the vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and
saving on water. Such a water supply/application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational costs on hand
watering and prove economical in the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of water supply chosen.
Machinery
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting (shredding) the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermi-
sheds, loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost before packing and for air drying of the
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
147
compost, automatic packing and stitching for efficient running of the unit. Costs of providing necessary implements and the machinery have to be
included in the project cost.
Transport
For any vermi-composting unit transport arrangement is a must. When the source of raw material is away from the production unit, an off-site
transport becomes major item of investment. A large sized unit with about 1000 tonnes per annum capacity may require a 3-tonne capacity mini-
truck. With small units particularly with the availability of raw material near the site, expending on transport facility may become infructuous. On-site
transport facilities like manually drawn trolleys to convey raw material and finished products between the storage point and the vermi-compost sheds
could also be included in the project cost.
Furniture
A reasonable amount could also be considered for furnishing the office-cum-stores including the storage racks and other office equipment. These
enhance the efficiency of operations.
Operational Costs
In order to operate the unit, expenditure on some items have to be incurred on a recurring basis. These items include salaries of the staff, wages to the
labourers, cost of raw material, fuel cost on transport of raw materials and finished goods, packing material cost, repairs and maintenance, power,
insurance, etc. The number of office personnel and labourers have to be decided breaking each activity into a number of sub-activities and for each
sub-activity estimating the work involved and the capacity of the labour to finish the work in a given time. The number of persons should be so chosen
to keep them engaged throughout by providing enough persons at various work points like stores, vermi-beds and equipping them with adequate
number of implements to avoid undue waiting.
Advantages of vermi compost:
1. Vermicompost is rich in all essential plant nutrients.
2. Provides excellent effect on overall plant growth, encourages the growth of new shoots / leaves and improves the quality and shelf life of the
produce.
3. Vermicompost is free flowing, easy to apply, handle and store and does not have bad odour.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
148
4. It improves soil structure, texture, aeration, and waterholding capacity and prevents soil erosion.
5. Vermicompost is rich in beneficial micro flora such as a fixers, P- solubilizers, cellulose decomposing micro-flora etc in addition to improve soil
environment.
6. Vermicompost contains earthworm cocoons and increases the population and activity of earthworm in the soil.
7. It neutralizes the soil protection.
8. It prevents nutrient losses and increases the use efficiency of chemical fertilizers.
9. Vermicompost is free from pathogens, toxic elements, weed seeds etc.
10. Vermicompost minimizes the incidence of pest and diseases.
11. It enhances the decomposition of organic matter in soil.
12. It contains valuable vitamins, enzymes and hormones like auxins, gibberellins etc.
200 TPA vermi-composting unit - Costs and Benefits
Sr no
Particular Years
I II onwards
1 Costs
a) Investment costs
i) Open sheds with bamboo mat roofing over bamboo frame work supported by wooden ballies 72000 -
ii) Machinery and tools 80000 -
iii) Office-cum-store 60000 -
iv) Water source 60000
v) 2 NADEP tanks 5000
Total 277000
b) Operational cost
For 5 cycles in a year @ Rs. 72,000 per cycle of 75 days 360000 360000
Lease rent 8000 8000
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
149
Total 368000 368000
2 Benefits
a) Sale of vermicompost of 200 tonnes @ Rs.2500/- per ton (60% in first year and 90% from 2nd year onwards)
300000 450000
b) Sale of worms @ 5 kg per tonne of compost and Rs. 50 per kg - 45000
c) Consultancy & ext. services - 10000
Total 300000 505000
Net Benefit 79200* 137000
* Operational cost for two cycles is capitalized in the first year
Production system: Crop demonstration
Introduction
The dictionary meaning of the word "demonstration" is the outward showing of a feeling etc.; a description and explanation by experiment; so also
logically to prove the truth; or a practical display of a piece of equipment to snow its display of a piece of equipment to show its capabilities . In short it
is a proof provided by logic, argument etc.
To define "it is a physical display of the form, outline or a substance of object or events for the purpose of increasing knowledge of such objects or
events. Demonstration involves "showing what or showing how". Demonstration is relatively uncomplicated process in that it does not require
extensive verbal elaboration.
To demonstrate the usefulness of new agricultural practices and its impact in increasing the crop productivity, large number of field demonstration
are being conducted under watershed project. To convince the farmers about the potentiality of different crop, demonstration on farmer's field is the
most effective extension method. In this programme a demonstration is put up on some hectare land of any progressive farmer in a crop of farmer's
choice. Half of the plot is sown as per the farmers package of practices and half plot is sown with advance or new agricultural practices. When crop is
in full bloom and the impact of new agricultural practices are quite visible, the field day/ kisan mela is organized at that site.
Objectives
This demonstration project aimed to showcase the technology on crop diversification using vegetable tunnel house. It specifically aimed to:
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
150
1) Increase family income in the area through improved farming techniques;
2) Establish a demonstration farm on crop diversification; and
3) Encourage other farmers to adopt the technology.
Steps in Conducting field demonstrations.
Since field demonstration is often used as an extension method, it is sometimes laid out in a routine manner. A well conducted demonstration, should
help the scientists to give finishing touch to changing attitude of farmers and extension workers and improve their knowledge, understand
1. Know the Vicinity:
The scientists need to develop an understanding of the farmers, their farming systems, resources and establish rapport with them. It is essential to
gather information on cropping system, present level of use of inputs and productivity of major crops of the area. There are different ways of knowing
vicinity. Some are formal and some are informal. A few areas under
a) Visiting villages and farmers.
b) Collection of information using PRA tools.
c) Meeting people individually and in groups.
d) Meeting opinion leaders.
e) Exchanging information with local extension workers; and
f) Consulting office records of population and basic agriculture.
2. Select Technologies:
Select only proven technologies which have higher potentialities in terms of yield, disease resistance, quality, and can fit in the existing farming
systems and situations of the area/farmers. Technology should be frontier ones i.e. recently released technologies or such which are at advance stage
of release. Be sure that the technology selected for demonstration is much superior to the technology being already in use. At this stage scientists
responsible for demonstration must have a lot of consultations with the research scientists who are responsible for released of the technology. They
should ask a number of questions from the research scientists and be satisfied about the superiority of the technology.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
151
3. Select Demonstration Site:
Avoid isolated farm. Demonstration site should be easily accessible for the farmers and extension workers. As far as possible, block of demonstration
site should have a good number of farmers of all categories of land holding and status. Never conduct block demonstration in a single farmer’s plot.
Pay also attention to farm size, layout of the field, soil type, fertility status, irrigation facilities and drainage system.
4. Select Demonstration Farmers:
A group of farmers land holdings in the selected demonstration block and who are willing to cooperate in the conduct of demonstration should be
selected. Demonstration farmers should be selected finally by holding a meeting in the village where the purpose of demonstration should be clearly
stated and suggestion sought from the farmers. Any difference in opinion may be sorted out tactfully otherwise there is a chance of having non
cooperation from those who are not selected as demonstrating farmers which may ultimately jeopardize the very purpose of demonstration.
5. Finalise Package of Practices:
This is an important step in planning the field demonstrations. Collect the new technologies from the ICAR Institute/SAU’s and ensure these
technologies are frontier ones showing substantial increase in yields. Involve as many scientists of the research station in the discussion as possible.
This will help in working out minute details of sequences of method demonstration required, identification of important tasks/practices in which
presence of scientists should be necessary and critical input for demonstration. Knowledge about farming conditions will be useful at this stage.
Involve also demonstrating farmers in finalizing package of practices. This will help in understanding the level of farmer’s practices, resource base to
sustain the technologies and their perspectives.
6. Prepare for demonstration:
Arrange critical inputs for the demonstration. Critical inputs are those agricultural inputs which are vital to help the selected technologies to exhibit its
production potentialities on farmer’s field and not earlier being used by the farmers. Arrange such inputs viz. seeds, fertilizers, farm equipments and
other inputs in time. Only critical inputs need to be supplied by the scientists. Other inputs should be arranged by the farmers themselves. Ensure that
the inputs which are to be given by the farmers are available with them. The farmers should never be given an impression that the demonstration is a
means of receiving free inputs. Rather they should be educated to understand the educational value of such demonstration.
Detail Project Report IWMP-18
152
Benefit and Impact
Demonstrations are carried out on the farmers’ field to show them practically, how to adopt suitable cropping pattern and use of balanced dose of
inputs with proper management of available water. The crop demonstration will have the following impact:
Increase in income since there is an increase yield and less input cost, such as fertilizers and chemicals ;
Environmental friendly since lesser use of chemical sprays to control pest and diseases and the basil repels insect pests; and
There are other more farmers that adopting new the technology.