Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | darren-griffith |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Development and Evaluation of
Performance Tests to Enhance Superpave Mix
Design and its Implementation in Idaho
DTOS59-06-G-00029 (NIATT Project No. KLK479)
ITD Project No. RP 181 (NIATT Project No. KLK483)
Project Progress, May 6, 2008
1
Team Fouad Bayomy (PI),
Dynamic properties, and overall project phases
SJ Jung, Fracture and Fatigue studies
Richard Nielsen, Reliability Studies
Thomas Weaver, Constitutive Modeling
Graduate Students Ahmad Abu Abdo Baek, Seung Il
ITD Coordinator (s) Mike Santi (Main Contact) Ned Parrish (Research Mgr) Others?? To be identified…..
USDOT Ashley Bittner / Ed Weiner,
COTR Paul Ziman (FHWA, Boise
Office) Others…
External Testing / Consulting Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc. Image analysis (Masad at TTI) X-Ray Tomography (WSU or
UT, Austin) NIATT and CE Support
Judy LaLonde Don Parks Others
2
Why this project?
ITD Moves towards SuperpaveSuperpave Mix Design System
Implementation of M-E DesignM-E Design guide at the national level
4
Project ObjectivesProject Objectives
Evaluate E* for Mixes that are commonly used in Idaho.
Determine E* vs. Temp for various binders used in Idaho, especially for polymer modified asphalts.
Develop constitutive models and develop procedure to estimate E* from given mix design properties.
Study of Gyratory Stability (GS) in relation to E*. Develop and evaluate mix fracture indicators for
ITD mixes. Incorporate reliability analysis.
5
Scope of Work
Phase A (Deformation study) Phase B (Fatigue and Fracture Study) Phase C (Implementation and Training) Phase D (Reporting)
7
Phase A: Mix Resistance to Deformation (E* and GS/CEI)
Tasks Literature Review Analytical Analysis Agg and Binders Evaluation Preparation and Evaluation of HMA
Mixtures Data Analysis Phase A Reports
8
Phase B: Mix Resistance to Fracture and fatigue Cracking
Tasks Literature Review Analytical Analysis Fracture Test Development Preparation and Evaluation of HMA
Mixtures Data Analysis Phase B Reports
9
Phases C and D: Implementation, Training & Reports
Tasks Work with ITD to Implement the Products Develop a training workshop to
disseminate the products Final Report / Peer Review
10
Progress
11
Phase / TaskQuarter
Month 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Task A1 – Review of previous studies and available data
10% 10% 2% 0% 2% 6% 0% 10% 40%
Task A2 – Analytical Analysis 12% 2% 4% 0% 7% 0% 5% 30%
Task A3 – Experimental Design, Binder and Agg. Eval.
15% 15% 10% 5% 15% 0% 5% 10% 75%
Task A4 – Prep and Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures 5% 5% 10% 15% 20% 15% 15% 85%
Task A5 – Data Analysis 10% 0% 5% 15%
Task B1 – Literature Review 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 0% 5% 50%
Task B2 – Finite Element Analysis 5% 5% 5% 5% 15% 5% 40%
Task B3 – Development of the Fracture Test Procedure
12% 2% 5% 16% 35%
Task B4 – Prep and Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures 0% 15% 10% 25%
Task B5 – Data Analysis 0%
Task B6 – Reliability Analysis 0%
Task C1 – Development of Implementation Plan 0%
Task C2 – Training Program for ITD Personnel 0%
Tasks A6, B7 and C3 – Quarter Reports for USDOT R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 Final 0%
Task D1: External peer review of the final report 0%
Task D2: Final report review by ITD 0%
Task D3: Final Report Submittal 0%
Phase C: Implementation of Research Products and Training
Reporting
Phase D: Final Report Review and Submittal
Phase A: Evaluation of Mix Resistance to Deformation
Phase B: Evaluation of Mix Resistance to Fracture and Fatigue Cracking
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Calendar Yr 2007 Calendar Yr 2008 Calendar Yr 2009
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Tot
al %
Tas
k
Com
ple
tedQ1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Progress
12
Phase / TaskQuarter
Month 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Task A1 – Review of previous studies and available data
10% 10% 2% 0% 2% 6% 0% 10% 40%
Task A2 – Analytical Analysis 12% 2% 4% 0% 7% 0% 5% 30%
Task A3 – Experimental Design, Binder and Agg. Eval.
15% 15% 10% 5% 15% 0% 5% 10% 75%
Task A4 – Prep and Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures 5% 5% 10% 15% 20% 15% 15% 85%
Task A5 – Data Analysis 10% 0% 5% 15%
Task B1 – Literature Review 10% 15% 5% 5% 5% 5% 0% 5% 50%
Task B2 – Finite Element Analysis 5% 5% 5% 5% 15% 5% 40%
Task B3 – Development of the Fracture Test Procedure
12% 2% 5% 16% 35%
Task B4 – Prep and Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures 0% 15% 10% 25%
Task B5 – Data Analysis 0%
Task B6 – Reliability Analysis 0%
Phase A: Evaluation of Mix Resistance to Deformation
Phase B: Evaluation of Mix Resistance to Fracture and Fatigue Cracking
Q1
Calendar Yr 2007 Calendar Yr 2008
Year 1 Year 2Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Budget Status – KLK483
Budget Category
FY08 Adjusted Budget
Year to Date Encumbered/ Projected Costs
01-Salaries 80,141.00$ 17,036.80$ -$ 63,104.20$ 79%
02-Fringes 15,859.00$ 3,880.05$ -$ 11,978.95$ 76%
03-Irregular Help 10,000.00$ -$ -$ 10,000.00$ 100%
04-Travel 4,000.00$ 741.73$ -$ 3,258.27$ 81%
05-Other Expense 12,748.70$ 10,112.94$ 17.97$ 2,617.79$ 21%
06-Capital > 5K -$ -$ -$ -$
07-Capital Outlay < 5K 2,251.30$ 2,251.30$ -$ -$ 0%
08-Reserve -$ -$ -$ -$
09-Overhead 25,000.00$ 6,804.55$ 18,195.45$ -$ 0%
10-Tuition/stipends -$ -$ -$ -$
Total 150,000.00$ 40,827.37$ 18,213.42$ 90,959.21$ 61%
Balance
Budget Status – KLK479
Budget Category
FY08 Adjusted Budget
Year to Date Encumbered/ Projected
Costs
01-Salaries 63,009$ 22,513$ 4,337$ 36,159$ 57%
02-Fringes 2,985$ 106$ 58$ 2,821$ 94%
03-Irregular Help 5,000$ 1,105$ 2,415$ 1,480$ 30%
04-Travel 7,700$ -$ -$ 7,700$ 100%
05-Other Expense 19,921$ 567$ 94$ 19,260$ 97%
06-Capital > 5K 100,000$ 60,822$ 25,000$ 14,178$ 14%
07-Capital Outlay < 5K -$ -$ -$ -$
08-Reserve -$ -$ -$ -$
09-Overhead 45,659$ 11,247$ 34,412$ -$ 0%
10-Tuition/stipends 22,998$ 9,900$ 94$ 13,004$ 57%
Total 267,272$ 106,259$ 66,411$ 94,602$ 35%
Balance
Reports
Monthly_ ITD Form 771 http://www.webs1.uidaho.edu/niatt/research/P
roject_Descriptions/KLK483.htm
Quarterlyhttp://www.webs1.uidaho.edu/bayomy/klk479-483/qreports.htm
15