Development Forum # II-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Roadway Framework Study
Development Forum # II-8 and I-10/Hidden Valley Roadway Framework Study
June 7, 2006June 7, 2006
Welcomes Project Team Introductions Study Background
Study AreaStudy OrganizationStudy PurposeStudy Process/Schedule
I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study Opportunities/Constraints Discussion
Study Area ConstraintsStudy Area OpportunitiesProject IssuesCommunity Concepts
Next Steps Closing RemarksAdjourn
Welcomes Project Team Introductions Study Background
Study AreaStudy OrganizationStudy PurposeStudy Process/Schedule
I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study Opportunities/Constraints Discussion
Study Area ConstraintsStudy Area OpportunitiesProject IssuesCommunity Concepts
Next Steps Closing RemarksAdjourn
AgendaAgenda
Study AreaStudy Area
Maricopa Association of GovernmentsCity of GoodyearCity of MaricopaTown of BuckeyeArizona Department of TransportationMaricopa County Department of TransportationPinal County
Maricopa Association of GovernmentsCity of GoodyearCity of MaricopaTown of BuckeyeArizona Department of TransportationMaricopa County Department of TransportationPinal County
Funding PartnersFunding Partners
Study Review Team (SRT)Study Review Team (SRT)
Ak-Chin Indian CommunityArizona Department of TransportationArizona State Land DepartmentCentral Arizona Association of GovernmentsCity of Casa GrandeCity of GoodyearCity of EloyCity of MaricopaFederal Highway AdministrationFlood Control District of Maricopa CountyGila River Indian CommunityMaricopa Association of GovernmentsMaricopa County Department of TransportationPinal CountyTown of BuckeyeTown of Gila BendU.S. Air ForceU.S. Bureau of Land Management
Ak-Chin Indian CommunityArizona Department of TransportationArizona State Land DepartmentCentral Arizona Association of GovernmentsCity of Casa GrandeCity of GoodyearCity of EloyCity of MaricopaFederal Highway AdministrationFlood Control District of Maricopa CountyGila River Indian CommunityMaricopa Association of GovernmentsMaricopa County Department of TransportationPinal CountyTown of BuckeyeTown of Gila BendU.S. Air ForceU.S. Bureau of Land Management
Large Property OwnersDevelopment FirmsHomebuildersReal Estate RepresentativesPublic and Private Asset Management OrganizationsChambers of CommerceEconomic Development OrganizationsPublic and Private UtilitiesRailroadsMunicipal and County Planning and Community Development Agencies
Large Property OwnersDevelopment FirmsHomebuildersReal Estate RepresentativesPublic and Private Asset Management OrganizationsChambers of CommerceEconomic Development OrganizationsPublic and Private UtilitiesRailroadsMunicipal and County Planning and Community Development Agencies
Development CommunityDevelopment Community
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Bob Hazlett, Project Manager; Ken Hall, Deputy Project Manager
DMJM HarrisPrime consultant; transportation and community planning, traffic and civil engineering, environmental review and community involvement
Wilson & Company (WCI)Traffic engineering and planning support
Lima & AssociatesTravel demand modeling and planning support
Partners for Strategic Action (PSA) Community involvement, public outreach and project communications
Curtis Lueck & Associates (CLA) Funding and implementation
Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Bob Hazlett, Project Manager; Ken Hall, Deputy Project Manager
DMJM HarrisPrime consultant; transportation and community planning, traffic and civil engineering, environmental review and community involvement
Wilson & Company (WCI)Traffic engineering and planning support
Lima & AssociatesTravel demand modeling and planning support
Partners for Strategic Action (PSA) Community involvement, public outreach and project communications
Curtis Lueck & Associates (CLA) Funding and implementation
Project Team CompositionProject Team Composition
Key elements include:Define both north-south and east-west high capacity corridorsEstablish future principal arterial networkEstablish access management strategies for high capacity corridorsDevelop alternative funding and implementation strategiesDiscuss the potential role of alternative modes
Study PurposeStudy Purpose
Research existing and future socio-economic conditionsResearch existing and planned urban growth patterns and infrastructure needsFormulate a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria to assess alternative Roadway Framework ScenariosDefine range of potential future Roadway Framework ScenariosUse “critical flaw” analysis to screen alternatives (Tier 1)Perform detailed evaluation of up to three Roadway Framework Scenarios (Tiers 2 and 3)Select recommended Roadway Framework Scenario and refineRecommend phasing of roadway improvementsPrepare implementation program and funding recommendation
Research existing and future socio-economic conditionsResearch existing and planned urban growth patterns and infrastructure needsFormulate a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria to assess alternative Roadway Framework ScenariosDefine range of potential future Roadway Framework ScenariosUse “critical flaw” analysis to screen alternatives (Tier 1)Perform detailed evaluation of up to three Roadway Framework Scenarios (Tiers 2 and 3)Select recommended Roadway Framework Scenario and refineRecommend phasing of roadway improvementsPrepare implementation program and funding recommendation
Study ProcessStudy Process
Three Network Alternatives
Critical Flaw
Detailed Evaluation
Draft Transportation
Network Recommendation
Project Constraint Criteria
Travel Demand Modeling Results
Evaluation Criteria and Performance
Measures
Freeways Parkways Principal Arterials
High Capacity Transit
MODAL ELEMENTS
Three Network Alternatives
Critical Flaw
Detailed Evaluation
Draft Transportation
Network Recommendation
Critical Flaw
Detailed Evaluation
Draft Transportation
Network Recommendation
Project Constraint Criteria
Travel Demand Modeling Results
Evaluation Criteria and Performance
Measures
Freeways Parkways Principal Arterials
High Capacity Transit
MODAL ELEMENTS
Freeways Parkways Principal Arterials
High Capacity Transit
MODAL ELEMENTS
Development and Evaluation of AlternativesDevelopment and Evaluation of Alternatives
Work Program and TimelineWork Program and Timeline
Working Paper #1: Project Management Plan (complete)Working Paper #2: Public Involvement Plan (complete)Working Paper #3: Existing and Future ConditionsWorking Paper #4: Travel Demand Forecast DevelopmentWorking Paper #5: Transportation Network AlternativesWorking Paper #6: Evaluation of AlternativesWorking Paper #7: Draft Transportation Network RecommendationWorking Paper #8: Funding Implementation StrategiesDraft Final ReportFinal Report with Executive Summary (poster-map format)
Working Paper #1: Project Management Plan (complete)Working Paper #2: Public Involvement Plan (complete)Working Paper #3: Existing and Future ConditionsWorking Paper #4: Travel Demand Forecast DevelopmentWorking Paper #5: Transportation Network AlternativesWorking Paper #6: Evaluation of AlternativesWorking Paper #7: Draft Transportation Network RecommendationWorking Paper #8: Funding Implementation StrategiesDraft Final ReportFinal Report with Executive Summary (poster-map format)
Project Work ProductsProject Work Products
Development Forums (two)Stakeholder/Community DatabaseKey Stakeholder InterviewsCommunity Workshops (two rounds)Elected Official Briefings (two rounds)Newsletters (four issues)Continuously Updated Page on BQAZ Website
Development Forums (two)Stakeholder/Community DatabaseKey Stakeholder InterviewsCommunity Workshops (two rounds)Elected Official Briefings (two rounds)Newsletters (four issues)Continuously Updated Page on BQAZ Website
Community Involvement ProgramCommunity Involvement Program
Anticipated major population and employment growth in study area, more than 800% in Pinal CountyComprehensive major roadway framework is needed to preserve critical right-of-wayIdeal timing to coordinate with other recently completed or ongoing visioning, community planning and transportation planning efforts
Anticipated major population and employment growth in study area, more than 800% in Pinal CountyComprehensive major roadway framework is needed to preserve critical right-of-wayIdeal timing to coordinate with other recently completed or ongoing visioning, community planning and transportation planning efforts
Challenging Study IssuesChallenging Study Issues
Topographic barriers make identification of high capacity corridors especially challengingMuch of the study area owned by major land management agencies (e.g., ASLD, BLM)Large number of jurisdictions, Indian Communities, and stakeholders involved in studyFunding resources clearly not in place to make required implementation investmentsDevelopment community is interested and can be a partner in achieving expeditious study implementation
Topographic barriers make identification of high capacity corridors especially challengingMuch of the study area owned by major land management agencies (e.g., ASLD, BLM)Large number of jurisdictions, Indian Communities, and stakeholders involved in studyFunding resources clearly not in place to make required implementation investmentsDevelopment community is interested and can be a partner in achieving expeditious study implementation
Challenging Study IssuesChallenging Study Issues
Transportation-Related Studies UnderwayTransportation-Related Studies Underway
Preliminary Study Area IssuesPreliminary Study Area Issues
Casa Grande Large Master Planned Communities
Estrella Mountain Ranch and Sonoran Valley Socio-Economic Forecasts
City of Maricopa Socio-Economic Forecasts
Casa Grande Major Service and Employment Centers
Potential GrowthPotential Growth
I-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework StudyI-10/Hassayampa Valley Roadway Framework Study
Extensive Public Outreach:
Development ForumsFunders TeamStudy Review TeamOver 120 Stakeholder Meetings
Three-tiered Evaluation ProcessStudy Recommendations:
Freeway CorridorsParkway CorridorsPrincipal ArterialsPrimary Access Management Strategies
Extensive Public Outreach:
Development ForumsFunders TeamStudy Review TeamOver 120 Stakeholder Meetings
Three-tiered Evaluation ProcessStudy Recommendations:
Freeway CorridorsParkway CorridorsPrincipal ArterialsPrimary Access Management Strategies
Stakeholder interviews with State agencies, Indian Communities, municipalities and development communityResearch all past and current community and transportation-related planning effortsDevelop transportation model to evaluate alternative Roadway Framework ScenariosInitiate definition of Roadway Framework ScenariosResearch current study area transportation-facility funding strategies, and define a universe of funding options
Next StepsNext Steps
A visionary framework for future transportation facilities and connectionsCorridor locations are conceptual and subject to refinementAppropriate future planning, engineering, and environmental studies will set specific alignments:
Regional Transportation PlanMunicipal General PlansCorridor Location StudiesDesign Concept Reports (DCRs)State and National Environmental Studies
Recommendations are not publicly-funded, but intended to establish the basis for future public and private investments and partnerships
A visionary framework for future transportation facilities and connectionsCorridor locations are conceptual and subject to refinementAppropriate future planning, engineering, and environmental studies will set specific alignments:
Regional Transportation PlanMunicipal General PlansCorridor Location StudiesDesign Concept Reports (DCRs)State and National Environmental Studies
Recommendations are not publicly-funded, but intended to establish the basis for future public and private investments and partnerships
Important Project ConsiderationsImportant Project Considerations
Please contact:
Bob Hazlett, P.E.Project ManagerMaricopa Association of Governments(602) [email protected]
Please contact:
Bob Hazlett, P.E.Project ManagerMaricopa Association of Governments(602) [email protected]
…For More Information…For More Information