Development of the methodology for environmental impact assessment of composite boats manufacturing...

http://casper.snu.ac.kr.

Development of the Methodology for Environmental Impact Assessment of Composite Boats Manufacturing Process

7 April, 2015

22nd CIRP conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 7-9 April 2015, Sydney Australia

Yong-Kuk Jeong, Philippe Lee, SeungHoon Nam, Dong Kun Lee, Jong-Gye Shin

Computer-Aided Systems and Production Engineering Research Laboratory

Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Yong-Kuk Jeong (Ph.D. Candidate, Seoul National University, Korea)

2 /41 http://casper.snu.ac.kr.

Environmental Impact Assessment of Composite Boats Manufacturing Process

Outline



Introduction



Introduction



Introduction



Introduction



Generic Yacht Work Breakdown Structure (YWBS)



Generic Yacht Work Breakdown Structure







Target data group C

Target data group A

Target data group B

WBS item

G4 (Object)

G2 (Management)

G3 (Activity)

WBS item for “Cost management of hull manufacturing activity”

Hull

Cost

Manufacturing




Material

Classification Society

Rating System

Related Industries

G5: Support

Electric System

Propulsion System

Outfitting System

Piping System

Hull and Appendage System

Sail System

G4: Object

Business

Development

Manufacturing

Service

G3: Activity

Integration Management

Scope Management

Time Management

Cost Management

Quality Management

Human Resource Management

Communications Management

Risk Management

Procurement Management

G2:Management

Estimation

Negotiation

G1: Project






Environmental Impact Assessment Model










Basic structure of the generic YWBS

Environmental impact results of the unit product

Surface area of composite products

Environmental impact value

BRE report data (Unit product value)







Manufacturing Process

Materias

Environmental Indicators

Summary Environmental

Rating

Climate Change

Fossil Fuel Depletion

Ozone Human Toxicity

Waste Disposal

Water Extraction

Acid Deposition

Ecotoxicity Eutrophication Summer Smog Minerals

Extraction

Hand Lay-Up

CSM/Polyester E B C A E C A A D A E B

Woven Glass/Polyester D B B A D C A A C A D C

Hemp/Polyester D B B A E A A A C A D A

CSM/Polyester +50% CaCO3 filler B A A A C C A A B A D D

CSM/Polyester +50% ATH filler C B B A C D A B E A D E

CSM/Low styrene (LS) polyester D B C A E C A A D A C B

CSM/LS polyester +50% CaCO3 filler B A A A C C A A B A C D

CSM/LS polyester +50% ATH filler C B B A C D A B E A C E

CSM/Epoxy C C A A B C E C E C A C

Hemp/LS polyester +50% CaCO3 filler B A A A C A A A B A D B

Spray-up

Glass rovings/Polyester E B C A E B A B D A D B

Glass rovings/Polyester +50% CaCO3 filler C B B A C B A A B A D D

Glass rovings/Polyester +50% ATH filler C B B A C D A B E A D E

Glass rovings/Low styrene (LS) polyester D B C A E B A B D A C B

Glass rovings/LS polyester +50% CaCO3filler B B B A C B A A B A C D

Glass rovings/LS polyester +50% ATH filler C B B A C D A B E A C E

Vacuum Bag Moulding

CSM/Polyester E B C A E C A A D A E B

Glass/Epoxy Prepreg (hot melt) C C B A B E D B D B A D

Carbon/Epoxy Prepreg (hot melt) E E E E C A B E B E A B

Co-mingled glass/Polypropylene A B B A B A A B B A A B

RTM

Woven Glass/Polyester C C C A C E A B B A A D

Hemp/Polyester B B B A D A A B B A A A

Carbon/Polyester D D E E D A A E B D A A

Woven Glass/Polyester +50% CaCO3 filler B B B A B E A B A A A E

Woven Glass/Polyester +50% ATH filler B C B A B E A C C A A E

Resin Infusion

Woven Glass/Polyester D B C A D D A B C A B C

Hemp/Polyester D B C A E A A A D A C A

Woven Glass/Low styrene (LS) polyester C B C A D D A B C A B C

Woven Glass/Epoxy B C A A A E D C C B A D

Autoclave Moulding

Glass/Epoxy Prepreg (hot melt) B C B A A E C B C B A D

Carbon/Epoxy Prepreg (hot melt) D D E E B A B E B E A B

Materias (Fiber / Resin / (Core))

Composite product manufacturing process

Rating scale

A B C D E

No environmental impact

Low environmental impact

High environmental impact

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%




Generic YWBS group Level 1 code Level 2 code Level 3 code Description Generic YWBS group Level 1 code Level 2 code Level 3 code Description

3 MAN NNN NNN Composite manufacturing process 4 HAS APD DST Deckhouse step

3 MAN LAM NNN Laminating process 5 MAT NNN NNN Composite material

3 MAN LAM HLU Hand Lay-up 5 MAT FPM NNN Fiber + Matrix

3 MAN LAM SPU Spray-up 5 MAT FPM CSP CSM/Polyester

3 MAN LAM VBM Vacuum Bag Molding 5 MAT FPM CPC CSM/Polyester +50% CaCO3 filler

3 MAN LAM RIF Resin Infusion 5 MAT FPM CPA CSM/Polyester +50% ATH filler

3 MAN LAM RTM Resin Transfer Molding 5 MAT FPM CLP CSM/Low styrene (LS) polyester

3 MAN LAM ATM Autoclave Molding 5 MAT FPM CLC CSM/LS polyester +50% CaCO3 filler

3 MAN LAM PLT Pultrusion 5 MAT FPM CLA CSM/LS polyester +50% ATH filler

3 MAN LAM CPM Compression Molding 5 MAT FPM CSE CSM/Epoxy

4 HAS NNN NNN Composite boat hull 5 MAT FPM GRP Glass rovings/Polyester

4 HAS HUS NNN Hull surface 5 MAT FPM GPC Glass rovings/Polyester +50% CaCO3 filler

4 HAS HUS HUS Hull surface 5 MAT FPM GPA Glass rovings/Polyester +50% ATH filler

4 HAS BHD NNN Bulkhead 5 MAT FPM GLP Glass rovings/Low styrene (LS) polyester

4 HAS BHD LBH Lower bulkhead 5 MAT FPM GLC Glass rovings/LS polyester +50% CaCO3filler

4 HAS BHD UBH Upper bulkhead 5 MAT FPM GLA Glass rovings/LS polyester +50% ATH filler

4 HAS DCK NNN Deck 5 MAT FPM GEP Glass/Epoxy Prepreg

4 HAS DCK UDK Upper deck 5 MAT FPM CEP Carbon/Epoxy Prepreg

4 HAS DCK HAT Hatch opening 5 MAT FPM CGP Co-mingled glass/Polypropylene

4 HAS DCK HPL Hold plan 5 MAT FPM WGP Woven Glass/Polyester

4 HAS SST NNN Superstructure 5 MAT FPM HMP Hemp/Polyester

4 HAS SST DHO Deckhouse opening 5 MAT FPM CBP Carbon/Polyester

4 HAS SST UDR Upper deck roof 5 MAT FPM WPC Woven Glass/Polyester+50% CaCO3 filler

4 HAS SST UDH Upper deckhouse 5 MAT FPM WPA Woven Glass/Polyester+50% ATH filler

4 HAS APD NNN Hull appendage 5 MAT FPM WGL Woven Glass/Low styrene (LS) polyester

4 HAS APD RST Rear step 5 MAT FPM WGE Woven Glass/Epoxy




Unit product i = 1

Manufacturing process

Material Environmental

impact value (pijk)

j = 1

k = 1 p111

k = 2 p112

k = 3 p113

j = 2 k = 1 p121

k = 2 p122

j = 3 k = 1 p131

Unit product i = 2


Material Environmental

impact value (pijk)

j = 1

k = 1 p211

k = 2 p212

k = 3 p213

j = 2 k = 1 p221

k = 2 p222

j = 3 k = 1 p231

Target product structure

Sub item Area of unit product (ani)

Unit product i = 1 Unit product i = 2

n = 1 a11 a12

n = 2 a21 a22

n = 3 a31 a32

n = 4 a41 a42




Target product

Sub item A Sub item B Sub item C

Material



Material



Material



Material





Applications: EcoReport




Generic YWBS

item list

Properties of the generic YWBS items

for EIA model

EIA results graph

View ViewModel Model

Databinding




«Logical Layer»View

«Logical Layer»View Model

«Logical Layer»Model

EI panel EI graphUnit product panelGeneric YWBS panel Unit EI value panel EI graphUnit area panel

«executable»EcoReport

Generic YWBS Unit product area Unit product EIUnit product

EI

«Logical Layer»Utility

TableExporter

«resource»LCAX(Life Cycle Assessment) Schema
















Open lcax file

Save lcax file













http://ecoreport.codeplex.com/




Generic YWBS structure and data

CAD model and basic data of target product

Identify composite component

Calculate laminate area of each component

Define properties of each component

BRE report data

Define unit product data Calculate environmental impact of unit product

Generate EIA results of each component

Generate EIA results of entire target product

(single skin, sandwich)




Hull surface (HAS-HUS-NNN)

Deck (HAS-DCK-NNN) Superstructure (HAS-SST-NNN)

Bulkhead (HAS-BHD-NNN)

Composite boat hull (HAS-NNN-NNN)




MARADO

Hull surface

HUL

Bulkhead

BHD

Deck

DCK

Superstructure

SST

Hull surface Lower bulkhead

Upper bulkhead

Upper deck

Hatch opening

Hold plan

Deckhouse opening

Upper deck roof

Upper deckhouse

Total laminate surface area of MARADO

= 3309.61 m2

= 3193.45m2 + 116.17m2

3193.45, 96%

116.17, 4%

Single skin Sandwich

Single skin = 1246.94 m2 (37.68%) Sandwich = 0.00m2 (0.00%)

Single skin = 182.69 m2 (5.52%) Sandwich = 9.135m2 (0.28%) (Component area / Total area percentage)



HLU

SPU

VBM

RTM

RIF

ATM

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

CSP WGP HMP CPC CPA CLP CLC CLA CSE GRP GPC GPA GLP GLC GLA GEP CEP CGP CBP WPC WPA WGL WGE

11,674

10,160 9,386

6,474

11,397 11,186

6,230

11,154

13,336 11,365

9,291

11,414 11,121

9,046

11,170

11,673 13,848

22,143

7,579

13,259

8,264

19,325

9,586

12,836

11,155

10,174

11,154

12,722

12800.2

19268.2

Envi

ron

men

tal I

mp

act

Val

ue

Material Choice HLU SPU VBM

RTM RIF ATM





0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

2,419

8,629 1,967

6,983

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

HLU-CLC VBM-CEP

SST-NNN

DCK-HPL

DCK-HAT

DCK-UDK

BHD-UBH

BHD-LBH

HUS-HUS



Conclusions



Conclusions



References

http://casper.snu.ac.kr.

Thank you for listening! 7 April, 2015

22nd CIRP conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 7-9 April 2015, Sydney Australia

Computer-Aided Systems and Production Engineering Research Laboratory

Dept. of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea

Yong-Kuk Jeong (Ph.D. Candidate, jake8967 at snu.ac.kr)

Date post:	16-Apr-2017
Category:	Engineering
Upload:	yong-kuk-jeong
View:	85 times
Download:	4 times