+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Dialogue Games

Dialogue Games

Date post: 03-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: holmes-hatfield
View: 48 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Approaches to dialogue. Dialogue Games. Part I:. Peter Kühnlein. Dialogue Games. Characteristic of dialogue games approaches: Dialogue is viewed as consisting of pairs or sequences of utterances that can be seen as moves in a game. Dialogue Games. Approach in case: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
171
1 Dialogue Games Part I: Approaches to dialogue Peter Kühnlein
Transcript
Page 1: Dialogue Games

1

Dialogue Games

Part I:

Approaches to dialogue

Peter Kühnlein

Page 2: Dialogue Games

2

Dialogue Games

Characteristic of dialogue games approaches:Dialogue is viewed as consisting of pairs or sequences of utterances thatcan be seen as moves in a game.

Page 3: Dialogue Games

3

Approach in case:Levin, J.A. & Moore, J.A., 1977: Dialogue Games: Meta-communicationStructures for Natural Language Interaction, ISI/RR-77-53, USCInformation Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way, Marina del Rey, CA 90291

Dialogue Games

Page 4: Dialogue Games

4

Motivation

Studies of natural dialogue indicate that people interact according to established patterns.These have the following characteristics: They• are frequently recurring•

Dialogue Games

Page 5: Dialogue Games

5

Motivation

Studies of natural dialogue indicate that people interact according to established patterns.These have the following characteristics: They• are frequently recurring• span several turns•

Dialogue Games

Page 6: Dialogue Games

6

Motivation

Studies of natural dialogue indicate that people interact according to established patterns.These have the following characteristics: They• are frequently recurring• span several turns • exhibit goal-oriented organization•

Dialogue Games

Page 7: Dialogue Games

7

Motivation

Studies of natural dialogue indicate that people interact according to established patterns.These have the following characteristics: They• are frequently recurring• span several turns • exhibit goal-oriented organization• can consist of multi-sentential units•

Dialogue Games

Page 8: Dialogue Games

8

Motivation

Studies of natural dialogue indicate that people interact according to established patterns.These have the following characteristics: They• are frequently recurring• span several turns • exhibit goal-oriented organization• can consist of multi-sentential units• belong to speaker‘s knowledge

Dialogue Games

Page 9: Dialogue Games

9

Motivation

There is a wealth of implicit information in dialogue.

Dialogue Games

Page 10: Dialogue Games

10

Motivation

There is a wealth of implicit information in dialogue.Effective communication requires shared information, as witnessed by the possibility to comprehend indirect utterances

Dialogue Games

Page 11: Dialogue Games

11

Motivation

There is a wealth of implicit information in dialogue.Effective communication requires shared information, as witnessed by the possibility to comprehend indirect utterances

Example:Person A: Do you have a match?

Dialogue Games

Page 12: Dialogue Games

12

Motivation

There is a wealth of implicit information in dialogue.Effective communication requires shared information, as witnessed by the possibility to comprehend indirect utterances

Example:Person A: Do you have a match?Person B: Sorry, I don´t smoke.

Dialogue Games

Page 13: Dialogue Games

13

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find

Dialogue Games

Page 14: Dialogue Games

14

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language

Dialogue Games

Page 15: Dialogue Games

15

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language• „world knowledge“

Dialogue Games

Page 16: Dialogue Games

16

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language• „world knowledge“• knowledge of conventional reasons for behaviour

Dialogue Games

Page 17: Dialogue Games

17

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language• „world knowledge“• knowledge of conventional reasons for behaviour

• We achieve goals through interaction with others

Dialogue Games

Page 18: Dialogue Games

18

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language• „world knowledge“• knowledge of conventional reasons for behaviour

• We achieve goals through interaction with others• We know which responses to expect.

Dialogue Games

Page 19: Dialogue Games

19

Motivation

Among the implicit information that is revealed in dialogues we find• conventional knowledge about language• „world knowledge“• knowledge of conventional reasons for behaviour

• We achieve goals through interaction with others• We know which responses to expect.

Sets of knowledge structures

Dialogue Games

Page 20: Dialogue Games

20

Dialogue games - intuition

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

Dialogue Games

Page 21: Dialogue Games

21

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language, especially indirect language use

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 22: Dialogue Games

22

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

People`s behaviour is seen as behaviour of goal pursuing organisms:goals determine the type of interaction they engage in

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 23: Dialogue Games

23

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

People`s behaviour is seen as behaviour of goal pursuing organisms:goals determine the type of interaction they engage in

Language use is a way of pursuing goals that speakers currently hold,and the knowledge of participants‘ goals hence a central part of DGs

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 24: Dialogue Games

24

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 25: Dialogue Games

25

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to solve a problem, and interacts with B to arrive at a solution.

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 26: Dialogue Games

26

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to solve a problem, and interacts with B to arrive at a solution.(Problem solving)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 27: Dialogue Games

27

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants some action performed and interacts with B to get her/him to perform it

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 28: Dialogue Games

28

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants some action performed and interacts with B to get her/him to perform it(Action seeking)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 29: Dialogue Games

29

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to know some specific information, and interacts with B in order tolearn it

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 30: Dialogue Games

30

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to know some specific information, and interacts with B in order tolearn it(Information seeking)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 31: Dialogue Games

31

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to know whether B knows some particular information, and interactswith her/him in order to find out

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 32: Dialogue Games

32

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants to know whether B knows some particular information, and interactswith her/him in order to find out(Information probing)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 33: Dialogue Games

33

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants B to know some information, and interacts with her/him to impart information

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 34: Dialogue Games

34

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A wants B to know some information, and interacts with her/him to impart information(Instructing)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 35: Dialogue Games

35

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A is unhappy about some state of affairs, and interacts with B to convey that unhappiness

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 36: Dialogue Games

36

Established patterns represented as sets of knowledge structures arecalled dialogue-games dialogue-games (DGs).They capture shared conventional knowledge about communication andthe use of communication to achieve goals

A dialogue comprehension model is developed:DG-identification, pursuit, termination captures functional aspects of language:

Focus on regularities relating to the function of dialogues for theparticipants

Example:A is unhappy about some state of affairs, and interacts with B to convey that unhappiness(Griping)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games - intuition

Page 37: Dialogue Games

37

Every DG consists of three parts:

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 38: Dialogue Games

38

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 39: Dialogue Games

39

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 40: Dialogue Games

40

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 41: Dialogue Games

41

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 42: Dialogue Games

42

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 43: Dialogue Games

43

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 44: Dialogue Games

44

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 45: Dialogue Games

45

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

DGs capture a collection of information common across many dialogues

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 46: Dialogue Games

46

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

DGs capture a collection of information common across many dialogues:Free variation of participants and of the subject of dialogue can be described by same DG (e.g. Helping)

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 47: Dialogue Games

47

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

DGs capture a collection of information common across many dialogues:Free variation of participants and of the subject of dialogue can be described by same DG (e.g. Helping):Individuals involved & subject vary across instances of a particular pattern

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 48: Dialogue Games

48

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

DGs capture a collection of information common across many dialogues:Free variation of participants and of the subject of dialogue can be described by same DG (e.g. Helping):DGs‘ parameters (roles, topic) have specific values for each particular dialogue

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 49: Dialogue Games

49

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 50: Dialogue Games

50

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 51: Dialogue Games

51

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 52: Dialogue Games

52

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals,

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 53: Dialogue Games

53

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals, • knowledge states,

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 54: Dialogue Games

54

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals, • knowledge states, • and the topic

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal

Page 55: Dialogue Games

55

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals, • knowledge states, in DGT: parameter• and the topic specifications

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – parameter specification

Page 56: Dialogue Games

56

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals, • knowledge states, parameter specifications• and the topic remain constant throughout the dialogue

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – parameter specification

Page 57: Dialogue Games

57

Every DG consists of three parts:

• set of parameters: dialogue participants (roles), subject of the dialogue (topic)• collection of (parameter) specifications: the set of participants‘ goals• partially ordered set of components: dynamic aspects of the game

Types of dialogues are distinguished by• sets of participants‘ goals• individual knowledge states

Each type of NL dialogue can be described wrt • goals, • knowledge states, parameter specifications• and the topic are known to participants

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – parameter specification

Page 58: Dialogue Games

58

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

Page 59: Dialogue Games

59

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

represent systematically changing aspects of DGs

Page 60: Dialogue Games

60

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

represent systematically changing aspects of DGsspecify subgoals for participants‘ roles

Page 61: Dialogue Games

61

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

represent systematically changing aspects of DGsspecify subgoals for participants‘ roles• partially ordered in time

Page 62: Dialogue Games

62

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

represent systematically changing aspects of DGsspecify subgoals for participants‘ roles• partially ordered in time• mutually complementary for participants

Page 63: Dialogue Games

63

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – more formal – components

represent systematically changing aspects of DGsspecify subgoals for participants‘ roles• partially ordered in time• mutually complementary for participantscontain expected sequences of intermediate states; these occur during instances of a particular pattern

Page 64: Dialogue Games

64

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Page 65: Dialogue Games

65

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game

Page 66: Dialogue Games

66

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game

Page 67: Dialogue Games

67

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game

Page 68: Dialogue Games

68

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Page 69: Dialogue Games

69

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance

Page 70: Dialogue Games

70

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game

Page 71: Dialogue Games

71

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Page 72: Dialogue Games

72

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid

Page 73: Dialogue Games

73

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values

Page 74: Dialogue Games

74

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game

Page 75: Dialogue Games

75

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s role

Page 76: Dialogue Games

76

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleIndicated by agreement, approval or by pursuing game

Page 77: Dialogue Games

77

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: rejection

Page 78: Dialogue Games

78

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: rejection, negotiation

Page 79: Dialogue Games

79

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: rejection, negotiation, ignoring

Page 80: Dialogue Games

80

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: rejection, negotiation, ignoring, interruption

Page 81: Dialogue Games

81

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: spontaneous termination by a) goal satisfaction

Page 82: Dialogue Games

82

Dialogue Games

Dialogue games – playing the games

Bidding a certain game• identifies game • indicates bidder‘s interest in pursuing the game• identifies intended parameter configuration

Typical response: Acceptance• without acceptance no pursuit of game• performed in different ways, often implicit

Acceptance of the bid of a game accomplishes: 1. recognition of bid 2. recognition of particular game and parameter values3. agreement to pursue game4. assumption of acceptor´s roleAlternatives: spontaneous termination by a) goal satisfaction b) unconditional goal failure

Page 83: Dialogue Games

83

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

Page 84: Dialogue Games

84

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

Page 85: Dialogue Games

85

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?

Page 86: Dialogue Games

86

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?2. How is this knowledge used to model the receptive acts of dialogue participants?

Page 87: Dialogue Games

87

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?2. How is this knowledge used to model the receptive acts of dialogue participants?3. What sort of machinery does it take to support this model?

Page 88: Dialogue Games

88

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?2. How is this knowledge used to model the receptive acts of dialogue participants?3. What sort of machinery does it take to support this model?

The focus of the model is on• the role of speaker´s motivations in structuring what he says

Page 89: Dialogue Games

89

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?2. How is this knowledge used to model the receptive acts of dialogue participants?3. What sort of machinery does it take to support this model?

The focus of the model is on• the role of speaker´s motivations in structuring what he says• importance of a speaker´s goals for language use

Page 90: Dialogue Games

90

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The Dialogue Game Model (DGM) attempts to answer the following questions:

1. What is the knowledge represented within the definition of a particular Dialogue-game?2. How is this knowledge used to model the receptive acts of dialogue participants?3. What sort of machinery does it take to support this model?

The focus of the model is on• the role of speaker´s motivations in structuring what he says• importance of a speaker´s goals for language use• interaction of these goals with the speaker´s knowledge of his hearer

Page 91: Dialogue Games

91

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The DGM is intended to

• specify processes for the comprehension of utterances in dialogues, using agents‘ knowledge structures

Page 92: Dialogue Games

92

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The DGM is intended to

• specify processes for the comprehension of utterances in dialogues, using agents‘ knowledge structures • allow to infer goals for generation of utterances

Page 93: Dialogue Games

93

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model

The DGM is intended to

• specify processes for the comprehension of utterances in dialogues, using agents‘ knowledge structures • allow to infer goals for generation of utterances• represent particular interactions, whereby the type of interaction is determined by goals of participants

Page 94: Dialogue Games

94

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues:

User sends requests to operator

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 95: Dialogue Games

95

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues:

User receives info from operator

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 96: Dialogue Games

96

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism;

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 97: Dialogue Games

97

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 98: Dialogue Games

98

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 99: Dialogue Games

99

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural in the sense that there are no artificially elicitated data

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 100: Dialogue Games

100

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural unbiased

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 101: Dialogue Games

101

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural unbiased without non-verbal cues

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 102: Dialogue Games

102

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural unbiased without non-verbal cues self-transcribed

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 103: Dialogue Games

103

Dialogue Games

The DGM is built upon the following data:

TENEX system dialogues: interactions of user and system operator via LINK mechanism; direct communication by typing on terminals

natural unbiased without non-verbal cues self-transcribed Goal pursuit methods and structures resemble those in voice dialogue and face-to-face interaction.

Dialogue game model – the data

Page 104: Dialogue Games

104

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

Page 105: Dialogue Games

105

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

Page 106: Dialogue Games

106

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

Page 107: Dialogue Games

107

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

4 O Try me.

Page 108: Dialogue Games

108

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

4 O Try me.

5 L I just connected to[computer site name] via TELNET,and tried the DIVERT.OUTPUT.STREAM.TO.FILE command. Strange things happened. Esp.y, my TELNET typescript is „busy“. Go ahead.

Page 109: Dialogue Games

109

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

4 O Try me.

5 L I just connected to[computer site name] via TELNET,and tried the DIVERT.OUTPUT.STREAM.TO.FILE command. Strange things happened. Esp.y, my TELNET typescript is „busy“. Go ahead.

6 O TELNET.TYPESCRIPT will always be busy until you do a RESET, but when you do that, be careful not to EXP, since that is a temporary file. Go ahead.

Page 110: Dialogue Games

110

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

4 O Try me.

5 L I just connected to[computer site name] via TELNET,and tried the DIVERT.OUTPUT.STREAM.TO.FILE command. Strange things happened. Esp.y, my TELNET typescript is „busy“. Go ahead.

6 O TELNET.TYPESCRIPT will always be busy until you do a RESET, but when you do that, be careful not to EXP, since that is a temporary file. Go ahead.

7 L I see … it´s not enough for me just to do a DISCONNECT? Go ahead.

Page 111: Dialogue Games

111

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the data

1 L Are you there? Go ahead.

2 O Yep, what´s up?

3 L Know anything about the TELNET SUBSYS? Go ahead.

4 O Try me.

5 L I just connected to[computer site name] via TELNET,and tried the DIVERT.OUTPUT.STREAM.TO.FILE command. Strange things happened. Esp.y, my TELNET typescript is „busy“. Go ahead.

6 O TELNET.TYPESCRIPT will always be busy until you do a RESET, but when you do that, be careful not to EXP, since that is a temporary file. Go ahead.

7 L I see … it´s not enough for me just to do a DISCONNECT? Go ahead.

8 O Correct: Is that the only problem?

Page 112: Dialogue Games

112

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic network

Page 113: Dialogue Games

113

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements

Page 114: Dialogue Games

114

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Page 115: Dialogue Games

115

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)

Page 116: Dialogue Games

116

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASK

Page 117: Dialogue Games

117

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe parameter specifications are:>HELPEE ISA PERSON>HELPEE WANTS ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>(( HELPEE ABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )) NOT )>HELPEE PERMITTED ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>HELPER ISA PERSON>HELPER WILLING ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))>HELPER ABLE ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))

Page 118: Dialogue Games

118

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe components are:>DS1: ( HELPEE WANT ( HELPER KNOW ( HELPEE PERCEIVE ACTION/ EXPECTED-1 PAST)))>DS2: ( HELPEE WANT ( HELPER KNOW ( HELPEE PERCEIVE ACTION/EXPECTED-2 PAST ) NOT ))>TS: ((( HELPER WANT ( HELPEE KNOW ACTION/NEW)) AND (( HELPEE PERFORM ACTION/NEW ) CAUSE ACTION/EXPECTED-2))> ((DS1 AND DS2) THEN TS)

Page 119: Dialogue Games

119

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe components are:>DS1: ( HELPEE WANT ( HELPER KNOW ( HELPEE PERCEIVE ACTION/ EXPECTED-1 PAST)))>DS2: ( HELPEE WANT ( HELPER KNOW ( HELPEE PERCEIVE ACTION/EXPECTED-2 PAST ) NOT ))>TS: ((( HELPER WANT ( HELPEE KNOW ACTION/NEW)) AND (( HELPEE PERFORM ACTION/NEW ) CAUSE ACTION/EXPECTED-2))> ((DS1 AND DS2) THEN TS)

(DS, the initial „diagnosis“ stage, specifies a „context-violation“ pattern; TS is the „treatment“ stage)

Page 120: Dialogue Games

120

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Page 121: Dialogue Games

121

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

Page 122: Dialogue Games

122

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

A semantic network is a set of nodes interconnected by relations

Page 123: Dialogue Games

123

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

A semantic network is a set of nodes interconnected by relations

pred

agent

object

PERFORM

HELPEE

TASK

A0004 (HELPEE PERFORM TASK)

Page 124: Dialogue Games

124

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe parameter specifications are:>HELPEE ISA PERSON>HELPEE WANTS ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>(( HELPEE ABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )) NOT )>HELPEE PERMITTED ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>HELPER ISA PERSON>HELPER WILLING ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))>HELPER ABLE ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))

Page 125: Dialogue Games

125

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe parameter specifications are:>HELPEE ISA PERSON>HELPEE WANTS ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>(( HELPEE ABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )) NOT )>HELPEE PERMITTED ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>HELPER ISA PERSON>HELPER WILLING ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))>HELPER ABLE ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))

Page 126: Dialogue Games

126

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

A semantic network is a set of nodes interconnected by relations

pred

agent

object

PERFORM

HELPEE

TASK

A0004 (HELPEE PERFORM TASK)

Page 127: Dialogue Games

127

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function

Example: DEFINEDG(HELPING)The parameters are:>HELPEE, HELPER, TASKThe parameter specifications are:>HELPEE ISA PERSON>HELPEE WANTS ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>(( HELPEE ABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )) NOT )>HELPEE PERMITTED ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK )>HELPER ISA PERSON>HELPER WILLING ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))>HELPER ABLE ( HELPER ENABLE ( HELPEE PERFORM TASK ))

Page 128: Dialogue Games

128

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

A semantic network is a set of nodes interconnected by relations

pred

agent

object

PERFORM

HELPEE

TASK

A0004 (HELPEE PERFORM TASK)

pred

agent

prop

WANT

HELPEE

A0004

A0005 (HELPEE WANT (HELPEE PERFORM TASK))

Page 129: Dialogue Games

129

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

A semantic network is a set of nodes interconnected by relations

parameter

parameter

parameter

HELPEE

HELPER

TASK

HELPING

Page 130: Dialogue Games

130

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

Page 131: Dialogue Games

131

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

„The parameter specification predicates create an interrelated structure with the Parameter nodes as central elements.

Page 132: Dialogue Games

132

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

„The parameter specification predicates create an interrelated structure with the Parameter nodes as central elements. This structure represents conventional knowledge about the participants and the topic of a helping interaction. […]

Page 133: Dialogue Games

133

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game model – the representational format

DGs are represented in a semantic networkThe implementation is by statements, which are• taken in by the DEFINEDG function • and stored in a semantic network

„The parameter specification predicates create an interrelated structure with the Parameter nodes as central elements. This structure represents conventional knowledge about the participants and the topic of a helping interaction. […] This knowledge about parameters is used in several ways - to select a particular DG, to initiate a DG, to generate expectations, and to terminate a DG.“ (p.13)

Page 134: Dialogue Games

134

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Page 135: Dialogue Games

135

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Page 136: Dialogue Games

136

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

Page 137: Dialogue Games

137

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

1. nomination

Page 138: Dialogue Games

138

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

1. nomination2. recognition

Page 139: Dialogue Games

139

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

1. nomination2. recognition3. instantiation

Page 140: Dialogue Games

140

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

1. nomination2. recognition3. instantiation4. conduct

Page 141: Dialogue Games

141

Dialogue Games

Dialogue game processing

Each DG „can bee seen as a problem solving operator, selected to accomplish some high level goal (represented in the Parameter Specifications), and then specifying (through its Components) a set of subgoals to pursue.“ (S.17)

Dialogue assimilation to DG in five stages:

1. nomination2. recognition3. instantiation4. conduct5. termination

Page 142: Dialogue Games

142

LONG-TERM MEMORYLONG-TERM MEMORY knowledge before dialogue starts

PROCESSORSPROCESSORS WORKSPACEWORKSPACE

MODIFIES

INFORMS

Worldknowledge•Objects•Processes•Concepts

Cognitive state ofpartner

Linguistic knowledge-words / semantic representations-case frames (verbs, predicates)

Dialogue Games

• parameters• parameter specification• components

tactical goals speaker / hearer

Rules ofinference,evidence

work semi-autonomously

parallel and concurrently

entities: activations

Dialogue Games

Page 143: Dialogue Games

143

PROTEUS spreading activation system

MATCH / DEDUCE production system - partial match - plausible inference

DIALOGUE GAMEPROCESSOR

investigates nominated DGseliminates conflicting DGs

PROCESSORSPROCESSORS

WORKSPACEWORKSPACE

activated concepts

nominated DGs

accepted DG

ultimate DG

FUNCTIONS in toto:

state of comprehensionand focus

partial and temporalprocessing results

modelling of implicitcommunication

comprehension ofrest of dialogue

DG terminationLONG-TERM MEMORY

Page 144: Dialogue Games

144

PROTEUS spreading activation system

MATCH / DEDUCE production system - partial match - plausible inference

DIALOGUE GAMEPROCESSOR

investigates nominated DGseliminates conflicting DGs

PROCESSORSPROCESSORS

WORKSPACEWORKSPACE

activated concepts

nominated DGs

accepted DG

ultimate DG

LONG-TERM MEMORY

FUNCTIONS in toto:

state of comprehensionand focus

partial and temporalprocessing results

modelling of implicitcommunication

comprehension ofrest of dialogue

DG termination

Page 145: Dialogue Games

145

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension

Page 146: Dialogue Games

146

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions

Page 147: Dialogue Games

147

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

Page 148: Dialogue Games

148

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour

Page 149: Dialogue Games

149

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways

Page 150: Dialogue Games

150

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals

Page 151: Dialogue Games

151

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication

Page 152: Dialogue Games

152

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals

Page 153: Dialogue Games

153

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

Page 154: Dialogue Games

154

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

DG structures allow for abbreviated communication

Page 155: Dialogue Games

155

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

DG structures allow for abbreviated communication:• during comprehension process: generation of expectations (used to resolve ambiguities); directing inferences

Page 156: Dialogue Games

156

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

DG structures allow for abbreviated communication:• during comprehension process: generation of expectations (used to resolve ambiguities); directing inferences• they focus the comprehension process wrt goals a speaker is pursuing with his utterance

Page 157: Dialogue Games

157

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

One central issue for comprehension is to identify those speaker´s goalsthat are motivating his utterances

Page 158: Dialogue Games

158

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

Meta-goal of comprehension (inherent in the model):„To comprehend an utterance is to find some previously known goal of the speaker which this utterance can be seen as furthering.“ (p.24)

Page 159: Dialogue Games

159

Dialogue game processing - comprehension

Dialogue Games

DGT implements some generalizations about language comprehension:

Comprehension of utterances involves association of particular functions• imputation of goals

• participants‘ goals underlie dialogue behaviour• speakers hold multiple goals; these are related in highly constrained ways • participants‘ goals are closely related; constrains co-occurrence of goals• participants use knowledge about goal structures for implicit communication• changes of dialogue „topic“ are side effects of changes of participants‘ goals• indirect communication depends on associating functions with utterances

Meta-goal of comprehension (inherent in the model):„To comprehend an utterance is to find some previously known goal of the speaker which this utterance can be seen as furthering.“ (p.24)

This is used to limit explosion of possible inferences focusing of effortimplicit in DG model

Page 160: Dialogue Games

160

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Page 161: Dialogue Games

161

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DG

Page 162: Dialogue Games

162

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameters

Page 163: Dialogue Games

163

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameters

Ex.: An utterance establishing parameters of INFO-SEEK DG can serve asindirect request:

Page 164: Dialogue Games

164

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameters

Ex.: An utterance establishing parameters of INFO-SEEK DG can serve asindirect request:• assertions of the speaker‘s own lack of knowledge

Page 165: Dialogue Games

165

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameters

Ex.: An utterance establishing parameters of INFO-SEEK DG can serve asindirect request:• assertions of the speaker‘s own lack of knowledge• questions about the other person‘s knowledge etc.

Page 166: Dialogue Games

166

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameterstermination of DG by change of parameter specifications

Page 167: Dialogue Games

167

Dialogue game processing – comprehension – indirect use of language

Dialogue Games

Functions of DGs:initiate another DGestablish new DG parameterstermination of DG by change of parameter specifications

fulfilling one component goal of an open game generates expectations about next component

Page 168: Dialogue Games

168

Dialogue games and Speech acts

Dialogue Games

Similarities:

• Interpretation of individual utterances uses words of utterance and context

Page 169: Dialogue Games

169

Dialogue games and Speech acts

Dialogue Games

Similarities:

• Interpretation of individual utterances uses words of utterance and context• Both depend on dialogue participants‘ knowledge especially wrt. topic of interaction

Page 170: Dialogue Games

170

Dialogue games and Speech acts

Dialogue Games

Similarities:

• Interpretation of individual utterances uses words of utterance and context• Both depend on dialogue participants‘ knowledge especially wrt. topic of interaction

Differences:

• DGs are bi-lateral actions & by definition interaction between two people Speech acts are unilateral actions

Page 171: Dialogue Games

171

Dialogue games and Speech acts

Dialogue Games

Similarities:

• Interpretation of individual utterances uses words of utterance and context• Both depend on dialogue participants‘ knowledge especially wrt. topic of interaction

Differences:

• DGs are bi-lateral actions & by definition interaction between two people Speech acts are unilateral actions

• DGs are multi-sentential units, they encompass multiple utterances and turns of a dialogue Speech acts consist of single utterances


Recommended