+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

Date post: 30-May-2018
Category:
Upload: parker-matthew-davis-emmerson
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010 http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 1/13 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgohs tb|axkb tbh Jhgs ac Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag Tbms vevh| vjeohs sanh ac tbh mdhes v|hshgthd mg atbh|* he|jmh| vevh|s mg th|ns ac tbh dhsmkgethd e|meljhs ac oanvjhr egej}sms' Tbh ca|ns e|h tbh senh es tbh atbh| vevh|s* lxt gh{ oagtax| ms hjxomdethd tb|axkb xsh ac oanvjhr egej}sms' | > Els F p D > Els F r ) Ì } D > r < ) } < MgY<3^0> _ajh L Els F p D >> r < ) } < * } C AxtY<3^> 00 } Ò . . r < ) Els F p D < 7 * 0 } Ò . r < ) Els F p D < 77 u Els F p D > < v Els F p D . < v r u Els F p D > < v Els F p D . < v B Els F p D W< . }W< J MgY82^0> \hajxtmagVjat?D F u Els F p D * 2 u * . < v * < v : * 2 p* . 5* 5 :D AxtY82^> _imvvmgk ebhed ca| `xst e nanhgt* mt {mjj lh sba{g jeth| tbet ve|enhth|s ac tbh oagh oeg lh essmkghd mg th|ns ac tbh dmcch|hgoh mg om|oxnch|hgohs ac t{a om|ojhs' V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
Transcript
Page 1: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 1/13

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgohs tb|axkb tbh Jhgs acOanvjhr Egej}sms

l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag

Tbms vevh| vjeohs sanh ac tbh mdhes v|hshgthd mg atbh|* he|jmh| vevh|s mg th|ns ac tbh dhsmkgethd e|meljhs ac oanvjhregej}sms' Tbh ca|ns e|h tbh senh es tbh atbh| vevh|s* lxt gh{ oagtax| ms hjxomdethd tb|axkb xsh ac oanvjhr egej}sms'

| > Els Fp D> Els Fr ) Ì } D> r < ) } <

MgY<3^0>_aj h L Els FpD>> r < ) } < * } C

AxtY<3^> 00} Ò . . r < ) Els FpD< 7* 0} Ò . r < ) Els Fp D< 77

u Els FpD> < v Els Fp D. < v r

u Els FpD> < v Els Fp D. < v B Els Fp DW< . } W <JMgY82^0>\h ajxtmagVjat?D Fu Els Fp D* 2u * . < v * < v : * 2p* . 5* 5 :D

AxtY82^>

_imvvmgk ebhed ca| `xst e nanhgt* mt {mjj lh sba{g jeth| tbet ve|enhth|s ac tbh oagh oeg lh essmkghd mg th|ns ac tbh dmcch|hgoh mgom|oxnch|hgohs ac t{a om|ojhs'

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 2: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 2/13

MgY8;^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L< v Els Fr ) Ì } D. < v Els Fr ) Ì } DW < .4 v Els Fr ) Ì } D< u . Els Fr ) Ì } D< u <

< v W < *

2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . 4 v * 4 v :C

AxtY8;^>

MgY88^0>Vjat?D L< v Els Fr ) Ì } D. < v B Els Fr ) Ì } DW < . } W<J * 2r* . 5* 5 : * 2}* . 5* 5 :C

AxtY88^>

< Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 3: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 3/13

Page 4: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 4/13

MgY44^0>Vjat?D L5

< v 4 v .

< v Els FpD< ) . } < Els FpD< ) Els FpD4

Els Fp D<

< v Els

Fp

D< ) . } < Els

Fp

D< ) Els

Fp

D4

Els FpD< Els FpD* 2}* . 5* 5 : * 2p* . 5* 5 :C

AxtY44^>

4 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 5: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 5/13

MgY4;^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5

< v 4 v . u

< v Els Fp D< ) . } < Els Fp D< ) Els Fp D4

Els Fp D< Els Fp D*

2}* . 5* 5 :* 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY4;^>

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 8

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 6: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 6/13

MgY42^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5

< v 4 v .

< v Els Fp D< ) . } < Els Fp D< ) Els Fp D4

Els FpD<u Els Fp D*

2}* . 5* 5 :* 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY42^>

3 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 7: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 7/13

MgY48^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v .

< v Els F r )Ì } D< ) . } < Els F r )Ì } D< ) Els F r )Ì } D4

Els F r )Ì } D<u Els Fr ) Ì } D

< v *

2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY48^>

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl ;

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 8: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 8/13

MgY43^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5

< v 4 v . u

< v Els Fr ) Ì } D< ) . } < Els Fr ) Ì } D< ) Els Fr ) Ì } D4

Els Fr ) Ì } D< Els Fr ) Ì } D*

2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY43^>

Els FpD>< v }

4 v . u u>

< v Els

Fp

D_mg

Fl

D4 v u . u <

MgY<?^0>_aj h L< v Els Fp D_mg Fl D

4 v u . u <

>> Els FpD* u C

AxtY<?^> 00u Ò < v . v < . v < _mg Fl D< 7* 0u Ò < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< 77

} Ò4 v . u u Els Fp D

< v >

4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fr ) Ì } D< v

>

4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< u Els Fp D< v

>

4 v . u < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els FpD< v

>4 v . u u Els Fr ) Ì } D

< v

2 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 9: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 9/13

MgY4<^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fr ) Ì } D

< v *

2r* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2}* . 5* 5 :C

AxtY4<^>

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl =

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 10: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 10/13

MgY8<^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< u Els Fp D

< v * 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY8<^>

56 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 11: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 11/13

MgY8?^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . u < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fp D

< v * 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2u * . < v * < v :C

AxtY8?^>

MgY84^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . u u Els Fr ) Ì } D

< v * 2r* . 5* 5 : * 2}* . 5* 5 : * 2u * . < v * < v :C

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 55

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 12: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 12/13

5< Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts

Page 13: Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 13/13

AxtY84^>

Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 5?

V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts


Recommended