Date post: | 30-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | parker-matthew-davis-emmerson |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 1/13
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgohs tb|axkb tbh Jhgs acOanvjhr Egej}sms
l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag
Tbms vevh| vjeohs sanh ac tbh mdhes v|hshgthd mg atbh|* he|jmh| vevh|s mg th|ns ac tbh dhsmkgethd e|meljhs ac oanvjhregej}sms' Tbh ca|ns e|h tbh senh es tbh atbh| vevh|s* lxt gh{ oagtax| ms hjxomdethd tb|axkb xsh ac oanvjhr egej}sms'
| > Els Fp D> Els Fr ) Ì } D> r < ) } <
MgY<3^0>_aj h L Els FpD>> r < ) } < * } C
AxtY<3^> 00} Ò . . r < ) Els FpD< 7* 0} Ò . r < ) Els Fp D< 77
u Els FpD> < v Els Fp D. < v r
u Els FpD> < v Els Fp D. < v B Els Fp DW< . } W <JMgY82^0>\h ajxtmagVjat?D Fu Els Fp D* 2u * . < v * < v : * 2p* . 5* 5 :D
AxtY82^>
_imvvmgk ebhed ca| `xst e nanhgt* mt {mjj lh sba{g jeth| tbet ve|enhth|s ac tbh oagh oeg lh essmkghd mg th|ns ac tbh dmcch|hgoh mgom|oxnch|hgohs ac t{a om|ojhs'
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 2/13
MgY8;^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L< v Els Fr ) Ì } D. < v Els Fr ) Ì } DW < .4 v Els Fr ) Ì } D< u . Els Fr ) Ì } D< u <
< v W < *
2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . 4 v * 4 v :C
AxtY8;^>
MgY88^0>Vjat?D L< v Els Fr ) Ì } D. < v B Els Fr ) Ì } DW < . } W<J * 2r* . 5* 5 : * 2}* . 5* 5 :C
AxtY88^>
< Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 3/13
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 4/13
MgY44^0>Vjat?D L5
< v 4 v .
< v Els FpD< ) . } < Els FpD< ) Els FpD4
Els Fp D<
< v Els
Fp
D< ) . } < Els
Fp
D< ) Els
Fp
D4
Els FpD< Els FpD* 2}* . 5* 5 : * 2p* . 5* 5 :C
AxtY44^>
4 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 5/13
MgY4;^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5
< v 4 v . u
< v Els Fp D< ) . } < Els Fp D< ) Els Fp D4
Els Fp D< Els Fp D*
2}* . 5* 5 :* 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY4;^>
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 8
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 6/13
MgY42^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5
< v 4 v .
< v Els Fp D< ) . } < Els Fp D< ) Els Fp D4
Els FpD<u Els Fp D*
2}* . 5* 5 :* 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY42^>
3 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 7/13
MgY48^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v .
< v Els F r )Ì } D< ) . } < Els F r )Ì } D< ) Els F r )Ì } D4
Els F r )Ì } D<u Els Fr ) Ì } D
< v *
2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY48^>
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl ;
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 8/13
MgY43^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L5
< v 4 v . u
< v Els Fr ) Ì } D< ) . } < Els Fr ) Ì } D< ) Els Fr ) Ì } D4
Els Fr ) Ì } D< Els Fr ) Ì } D*
2r* . 5* 5 :* 2}* . 5* 5 :* 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY43^>
Els FpD>< v }
4 v . u u>
< v Els
Fp
D_mg
Fl
D4 v u . u <
MgY<?^0>_aj h L< v Els Fp D_mg Fl D
4 v u . u <
>> Els FpD* u C
AxtY<?^> 00u Ò < v . v < . v < _mg Fl D< 7* 0u Ò < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< 77
} Ò4 v . u u Els Fp D
< v >
4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fr ) Ì } D< v
>
4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< u Els Fp D< v
>
4 v . u < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els FpD< v
>4 v . u u Els Fr ) Ì } D
< v
2 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 9/13
MgY4<^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fr ) Ì } D
< v *
2r* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2}* . 5* 5 :C
AxtY4<^>
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl =
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 10/13
MgY8<^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< u Els Fp D
< v * 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY8<^>
56 Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 11/13
MgY8?^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . u < v ) v < . v < _mg Fl D< Els Fp D
< v * 2p* . 5* 5 :* 2l * . v * v : * 2u * . < v * < v :C
AxtY8?^>
MgY84^0>Oagtax|Vjat?D L4 v . u u Els Fr ) Ì } D
< v * 2r* . 5* 5 : * 2}* . 5* 5 : * 2u * . < v * < v :C
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 55
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 12/13
5< Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts
8/14/2019 Difference in Circumference through Complex Analysis by Parker Emmerson, © February 8, 2010
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/difference-in-circumference-through-complex-analysis-by-parker-emmerson- 13/13
AxtY84^>
Dmcch|hgoh mg Om|oxnch|hgoh tb|axkb Oanvjhr Egej}sms l} Ve|ih| Hnnh|sag* © Chl|xe|} 2* <656'gl 5?
V|mgthd l} Netbhnetmoe ca| _txdhgts