Dina Mansur Abdat, S.Si, M.SiHead of Sub Directorate Pollution Control for Small Enterprises and Non Point Source
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT and FORESTRY (MOEF)REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
Place/Date of Birth: Surakarta Central Java/21 Januari 1970Education:Faculty of Biology in Gadjah Mada University- YogyakartaMagister of Public Administration in Gadjah Mada University-YogyakartaWork Experience :1996-2000 Environmental Impact Management Agency2000-2010 Center for Environmental Management Region Bali,East Nusa, West Nusa – MOE2010-2016 Center for Environmental Management Region Java – MOEF2017 Directorate for Water Pollution Control-MOEF –Head of Sub Directorate for Pollution Control From Small Scale Enterprises and Non Point Source
Pollution to river
Domestic waste
Urban farming
Ocean
Industrial waste
Other activities
Kegiatan pertambangan
Livestock
Pollutan source, the receiving water body, total pollutant estimation (especially key parameter) Contribution from each pollution source – priority pollution
control programs/activity
MOEF/Provincial-District intitutionEF / Provincial-
District institution of
MSME
MOEF/Provincial-District intitutionEF / Provincial-
District institution of
MSME
Industry (CSR)Industry (CSR)
Industry Assosiation
Industry Assosiation
Private sector, NGO, universityPrivate sector,
NGO, university
Technical guideline, best
aplicabletechnology for MS enterprise
Technical guidance,
monev
Pilot Project,
replication
MOEF1. MSSE Mapping2. MSSE Database3. Priority Setting
MSSE: Micro Small Scale Enterprises
Source: National Statistical Buareu 2011
48,85%: Livestock,Farmeries, forestry, fisheries mostly micro and small enterprises
Constitution No. 20 year 2008 About Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises :1. Micro: Has a net worth/asset at most
Rp. 50 millions/USD 3.846 excluding lands and buildings. Maximum sale/ year Rp. 300 millions/USD 23.076
2. Small: Has a net worth Rp. 50 millions/USD 3.846 – Rp. 500 millions/USD 38.461 excluding lands and buildings. Maximum sales/year Rp. 300 millions/USD 23.076 - Rp. 2,5 billions/ USD 192.307
3. Medium: Has an asset > rp. 500 millions/ USD 38.461 – rp. 10 billions/USD 769.230. Maximum sales / year > Rp. 2,5 billions/USD 192.307 –Rp. 50 billions/ USD 3.846.153.
*note : 1 USD = Rp. 13.000
Study of MOEF (2015), the potential for water pollution load reduction from MSSE activities ranks third after the domestic and industrial sectors.
Source: Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health Ministry of Agriculture, 2017
Tabel 1: Livestock Population
Tabel 3: Potential Pollution Load from Livestock= unit of livestock X emission factor X 20% (potential runoff)
Source: Research Center for Water Resources Development, 2004
Parameter unit Buffalos Cows Horses Pigs Sheeps Goats Chickens Gooses
BOD gr/unit/day
207 292 226 128 55,7 34,1 2,36 2,46
COD 530 717 558 362 136 92,9 5,59 6,67
Parameter unit EF Cow( year 2017)
Potential Pollutan Load From Beef and Dairy cattle (2017)
(17.144.000 x EF x 0,2)
BOD Kg/unit/day 0,292 1.001.209 Kg/day
COD 0,717 2.458.449 Kg/day
Source: 2009 Rural Technology Development Institute in Decreasing Pollution Load - MOE 2014
Parameter unit EF Cow
Potential PollutanLoad From Beef and Dairy cattle (2017)(17.144.000 x EF x
0,2)
Potential PollutanLoad Reduction
(Kg/day)(Population x EF x
0,2) x DE
CO2 Reduction(Pop x 0,008 x
25)
Economic Value from LPG
substitution /day
(Rp 10.000/kg LPG)
=(Pop x 12 x 0,04
x 0,46 x Rp10.000)
BOD Kg/unit/day
0,292 1.001.209Kg/day 500.604 kg/day 3.428.800 kg/day
37.853.952.000 = US 2.911.842
COD 0,717 2.458.449 Kg/day 1.229.224 Kg/day
0,2 = potential runoff0,008 = emision factor methane/cattle 25 = convertion factor (1 kg CO2 equal to 25 kg methane)12 = buffalo feses/day (Kg)0,04 = convertion 1 kg feses equal to 40 liter biogas 0,46 = 1 k g biogas equal to 0,46 LPG
No YEAR LOCATIONAMOUNT OF BUFFALO
POLUTAN LOAD BOD
(Kg/day)
POLUTAN LOAD REDUCTION
BOD(Kg/day)
CO2 REDUCTION (Kg/day)
POTENTIAL BENEFIT
ECONOMI(Rupiah/day)
TOTAL FAMILY
1 2008 KAB. WONOGIRI 616.00 161.39 145.25 80.08
1,360,100.00 148
2 2010 KAB. KULONPROGO 265.00 69.43 62.49 715.50
585,100.00 64
3 2010 KAB. ASAHAN 80.00 20.96 18.86 216.00
176,600.00 19
4 2011 KAB. KULONPROGO 178.00 46.64 41.97 480.60
393,000.00 43
5 2011 KAB. ASAHAN 80.00 20.96 18.86 216.00
176,600.00 19
6 2011 KAB. BLORA 207.00 54.23 48.81 558.90
457,100.00 50
7 2011 KAB. KUDUS 120.00 31.44 28.30 324.00
265,000.00 29
8 2011 KAB. DEMAK 210.00 55.02 49.52
567.00 463,700.00 50
9 2011 KAB. JEPARA 234.00 61.31 55.18 631.80
516,700.00 56
10 2011 KAB. KARANGANYAR 120.00 31.44 28.30 324.00
265,000.00 29
11 2011 KAB. SEMARANG 276.00 72.31 65.08 745.20
609,400.00 66
12 2011 KAB. TEGAL 120.00 31.44 28.30 324.00
265,000.00 29
Pilot Project MOEF 2007-2017 Reduction Polutan Load from Cattle’s Waste Becoming Biogas
No YEAR LOCATIONAMOUNT OF BUFFALO
POLUTAN LOAD BOD
(Kg/day)
POLUTAN LOAD REDUCTION
BOD(Kg/day)
CO2 REDUCTION (Kg/day)
POTENTIAL BENEFIT
ECONOMI(Rupiah/day)
TOTAL FAMILY
13 2011 KAB. BREBES 120.00 31.44 28.30 324.00
265,000.00 29
14 2011 KAB. SUKOHARJO 150.00 39.30 35.37 405.00
331,200.00 36
15 2011 KAB. BANTUL 300.00 78.60 70.74 810.00
662,400.00 72
16 2011 HIVOS 27,798.00 7.283,08 6.554,77
75,054.00 61,370,000.00 6.672
17 2012 KAB. MUSIRAWAS 156.00 40.87 36.78
421.20 344,400.00 37
18 2012 KOTA KUPANG 36.00 9.43 8.49 97.20
79,500.00 9
19 2013 KOTA MATARAM 90.00 23.58 21.22 243.00
198,700.00 22
20 2013 KAB. KARANGANYAR 50.00 6.40 5.76
3.50 110,400.00 12
21 2013KAB. KOTA WARINGIN
BARAT 44.00 11.53 10.38
118.80 97,200.00 11
22 2013 KAB. OGAN ILIR 60.00 15.72 14.15
162.00 132,500.00 14
23 2014KAB. BANDUNG
MAJALAYA 45.00 11.79 3.54 121.50 99,360.00 11
24 2015 KAB. BANDUNG 60.00 15.72 4.72 162.00 132,480.00 14
25 2015 KOTA DEPOK 48.00 12.58 3.77 129.60 105,984.00 12
No YEAR LOCATIONAMOUNT OF BUFFALO
POLUTAN LOAD BOD(Kg/day)
POLUTAN LOAD REDUCTION
BOD(Kg/day)
CO2 REDUCTION (Kg/day)
POTENTIAL BENEFIT
ECONOMI(Rupiah/day)
TOTAL FAMILY
26 2015 KAB. BOYOLALI 60.00 15.72 4.72 162.00 132,480.00 14
27 2015 KAB. SUKOHARJO 60.00 15.72 4.72 162.00 132,480.00 14
28 2015 KAB. SIDOARJO 45.00 11.79 3.54 121.50 99,360.00 11
29 2015 KAB. TULUNG AGUNG 60.00 15.72 4.72 162.00 132,480.00 14
30 2015 KOTA MALANG 60.00 15.72 4.72 162.00 132,480.00 14
31 2016 KOTA BLITAR 46.00 12.05 3.62 124.20 101,568.00 11
32 2016 KAB. GORONTALO 47.00 12.31 3.69 126.90 103,776.00 11
33 2016 KAB. BANDUNG 20.00 5.24 1.57 54.00 44,160.00 5
34 2017 KAB. BOJONEGORO 42.00 11.00 3.30 113.40 92,736.00 10
TOTAL 31,903.00 1,068.81 868.72 84,422.88 70,433,944.00 992.99
Basic Principal of Biodigester
Cattle’s CageMixing container
(feses + Water=liquid waste)
Inlet BiodigesterDelegation Container
Slurry tank
Bio fertelizer
1. Livestock2. Mixing
kotoran dg air 1:1
3. Inlet & digester
4. Digester & delegation container
5. Dome of Delegation
6. Manometer7. Stove
1 3 4
8 7 6
2
1. Livestock 2. inlet - mixing3. Inlet, Digester I,
Digester delegation container
4. Inlet, Digester, Delegation container
5. Manometer and stove
4
321
5
1. Soil Digging2. Placements
of bricks on the Digester3. inlet
4. Digester is plastered by
cement5. Digester
Delegation container
2
6 5
4
3
1
Technically: there is a constraint because the construction of biodigester generally can not be done independently by cattle ranchers
Economically: the cost for impurities from 4-5 cows is identical to the capacity of 6 M3 digester that costs Rp. 25 million/ US 1,923 (1 cow produced 20-30 Kg feses and urin)
Budget constrain of Provincial/District Environment Institution: Physical infrastructure support for biodigesterhas been provided as pilot project from MOEF by national budget/APBN.
MOEF encourages the establishment of provincial / regency / municipality government policy in developing zonation of micro small enterprises activities so that communal biodigester can be built for waste management into bioenergy
MOEF already develop draft of Ministerial Decree for Pollution Prevention from Micro and Small Enterprises that consist of articles: Design Urban Planning of District Government should take into account zonation to integrating micro and small enterprises and equiped with communal WWTP – Ministerial Decree will declare on 2018
Since 2006-2017 National Budget provide alocation to District Gov through DAK ( Special Budget) to suport infrastructure for biodigester, and will continue. Some Provincial district alocatedlocal budget to replicate biodig
1. Livestock waste maintenance in Indonesia besides to suppress pollution in water bodies also produces biogas as an additional benefit (co benefit)
2. The use of biogas reduces household expenditure to buy cooking fuel (LPG)
3. The potential of conversion of waste to energy in Indonesia is still very open because the number of livestock each year is increasing
4. Cattle waste management in Indonesia should continue to be encouraged in addition to improv water quality as well as supporting Greenhouse Gases emission reduction activities.
1. Livestock and Animal Health Statistics 2017. Publisher: Directorate General of Animal Husbandry and Animal Health Ministry of Agriculture
2. Constitution No. 20 of 2008 on Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises3. Constitution No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Management4. Central Bureau of Statistics 20115. Reduction of Polutan Load From Small Scale Enterprises, MOE 2014