District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback

WebinarNovember 17, 2014

Lisa Colón, Educator Effectiveness CoordinatorIdaho State Department of Education

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar

• Objectives:– Identify common areas that teacher and

principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision and the elements that are required.

– Review principal and teacher evaluation plan templates.

– Answer questions.

Evaluation Plan SectionsTeacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120• 120.01 Standards• 120.02 Professional Practice• 120.03 Student Achievement• 120.04 Participants• 120.05 Evaluation Policy –

Content• 120.06 Evaluation Policy –

Frequency of Evaluation• 120.07 Evaluation Policy –

Personnel Records• 120.08 Evaluation System

Approval

Principal Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.121• 121.01 Standards• 121.02 Professional Practice• 121.03 Student Achievement• 121.04 Evaluation Policy –

Content• 121.05 Evaluation Policy –

Frequency of Evaluation• 121.06 Evaluation Policy –

Personnel Records• 121.07 Evaluation System

Approval

Needs Revision Common Areas

• Professional Practice• Student Achievement• Evaluation Policy

Needs Revision – Professional Practice

Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.01 & 08.02.02.120.02• 67% based on multiple measures

of professional practice– Aligned to Charlotte Danielson’s

Framework for Teaching Second Edition (4 domains – 22 components)

– Two (2) documented observations with one completed by January 1st.

– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Student Input• Portfolio

Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.01 & 08.02.02.121.02• 67% based on multiple

measures of professional practice– Aligned to Idaho Standards for

Effective Principals (3 domains – 14 components)

– Identifies/Describes process of including at least one of the following:• Parent/Guardian Input• Teacher Input• Student Input• Portfolio

Needs Revision – Student Achievement

Teacher Evaluation PlanIDAPA 08.02.02.120.03• 33% based on multiple

measures of student achievement– Based on growth in student

achievement.– Include at least two

measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.

– Identifies the other district determined measure.

Principal EvaluationIDAPA 08.02.02.121.03• 33% based on multiple

measures of student achievement– Based on growth in

student achievement.– Include at least two

measures with one of the measures based on ISAT by Smarter Balanced.

– Identifies the other district determined measure.

Other District Determined Student Achievement Measure Examples

• Student Learning Objectives (SLO’s)• Pre and Post Assessments• End of Course Assessments• District-adopted vendor

assessments

Questions?

• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement

• Next part of the webinar will cover evaluation policy and the evaluation plan-policy templates.

Needs Revision – Evaluation Policy

Teacher Evaluation Plan• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.05

Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)

• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.06 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation

• IDAPA 08.02.02.120.07 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records

Principal Evaluation• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.04

Evaluation Policy – Content (all 15 areas)

• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.05 Evaluation Policy – Frequency of Evaluation

• IDAPA 08.02.02.121.06 Evaluation Policy – Personnel Records

Evaluation Plan – Policy Templates

• Resource for districts – not a required format/form.

• Includes all areas as required by IDAPA Rule.

• Cannot be submitted as written:– Districts need to define the areas that

are to be planed or determined by the district.

Individualizing Evaluation Rating System

• Shall be based on 67% Professional Practice and 33% Student Achievement–Numerical Summative Rating–Matrix Summative RatingProfession

al Practice(67%)

Student Achieveme

nt(33%)

Summative Evaluation

Rating

Overall Summative RatingMatrix Example

Professional Practice - 67%Unsatisfactory = 1 Basic = 2 Proficient = 3 Distinguished = 4

Student Achievement - 33%

Unsatisfactory = 1 Unsatisfactory= 1.00

Unsatisfactory= 1.67

Basic= 2.34

Proficient= 3.01

Basic = 2 Unsatisfactory= 1.33

Basic= 2.00

Proficient= 2.67

Proficient= 3.34

Proficient = 3 Unsatisfactory= 1.66

Basic= 2.33

Proficient= 3.00

Distinguished= 3.67

Distinguised = 4 Unsatisfactory= 1.99

Proficient= 2.66

Proficient= 3.33

Distinguished= 4.00

Overall Summative Rating Scale3.50-4.00 = Distinguished

2.50-3.49 = Proficient

2.00-2.49 = Basic

1.00-1.99 = Unsatisfactory

District and Charter Evaluation Plan Feedback Webinar

• Common areas that teacher and principal evaluation plans were documented as needing revision:– Professional Practice– Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy

• Evaluation plan templates as resource for districts.

Questions?

• Any questions regarding:– 67% Professional Practice– 33% Student Achievement– Evaluation Policy– Evaluation Plan-Policy Templates

Thank You!Lisa Colón

Educator Effectiveness Coordinatorlcolon@sde.idaho.gov

(208) 332-6917