Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0 Submission March 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 802.11...

March 2009

Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

802.11 March 2009 Closing Plenary Reports

Date: 2009-03-12

Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel

Corporation +44 792 008

4900 (mobile)

[email protected]

Authors:

March 2009


Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the March 2009 closing plenary meeting.

March 2009


Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (Mar 09)

Date: 2009-03-12

Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel Corporation [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0322r1 by Adrian Stephens (Intel Corporation)

March 2009


Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Summary of actions – 2009-03-10

• Michelle to check Get802 status for .11r - done

• Nancy to publish MEC comments for .11w

• Adrian to ping Menzo on whether he has updated 11-08/0644r5 (numbering spreadsheet) – done, in process

• Goal: get TGz and TGp to have updated the numbering spreadsheet by May 09 meeting.

• All: please send draft status update via the editor’s reflector asap, but no later than Thursday am2 to update table on next page!

• Necati email to Michelle list of issues with templates


March 2009


Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract / Agenda

• Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector

• Publication Work Plan

• Amendment Ordering / ANA Status / Draft Snapshots

• Draft naming rules

• Conference Calls

• Editorial Streamlining Projects

• Archival material– Lessons Learned


March 2009


Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Roll Call• Editor’s Present

– P802.11mb Amendment (REVmb) – Adrian Stephens– P802.11n Amendment (HT) – Adrian Stephens– P802.11p Amendment (WAVE) – Wayne Fisher– P802.11s Amendment (MESH) –Kazuyuki Sakoda (until end ‘09)– P802.11u Amendment (IW) -- Necati Canpolat– P802.11w Amendment (SEC) – Nancy Cam-Winget– P802.11v Amendment (WNM) – Emily Qi– P802.11aa Amendment (VTS) – Hang Liu

• Also present:• IEEE Staff present:

– Michelle Turner – staff editor for 802, [email protected]

• 802.11 Editor’s Not Present

– P802.11y Amendment (CBP) – Peter Ecclesine– P802.11z Amendment (TDLS) – Menzo Wentink

• IEEE Staff not present and always welcome!– Kim Breitfelder – manager publishing, [email protected]?– Michael Kipness – our staff liaison, [email protected]?

• Note: editors request that an IEEE staff member should be present at least during Plenary meetings

– Michelle Turner is present at this plenary meeting


March 2009


Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGn – Adrian Stephens – [email protected]

• TGp – Wayne Fisher – [email protected]

• TGs – Temporary: Kazuyuki Sakoda - [email protected]

• TGu – Necati Canpolat – [email protected]

• TGv – Emily Qi – [email protected]

• TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – [email protected]

• TGz – Menzo Wentink– [email protected]

• TGmb – Adrian Stephens – [email protected] (TBC)

• TGaa – Hang Liu – [email protected]

• Editor Emeritus:

– TGk – Joe Kwak– [email protected]

– TGr – Bill Marshall – [email protected]

– TGy – Peter Ecclesine – [email protected]


March 2009


Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Reflector Updates

• Each editor is expected to be on the reflector and current.

• If you didn’t receive the meeting notice from the reflector, please send email to [email protected]

• To be updated:– None


March 2009


Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

IEEE Publication Status

• IEEE 802.11-2007 published and for free download with Get802– Published in June 2007

– Combines all existing amendments and includes maintenance work by TGma

• Publications completed for 802.11k, 802.11r and 802.11y, – 11k now available with Get802

– 11r now available with Get802


March 2009


Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

MEC Status

• P802.11n D6.0 has gone through Mandatory Editorial Coordination (document 11-08-1045r0)– SCC14 coordination done

– Second review by Michelle pending

• 11w has gone through Mandatory Editorial Coordination (09-????) in September– Action: Nancy to publish MEC comments for .11w


March 2009


Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Alignment Process for 802.11k/r/y

• The 08/0644r5 Numbering Spreadsheet has all changes from publication of 11k and 11r and 11y (and 11n D7.03 and 11w D7.0)

• ?? TGz has done it? • Action: Adrian to ping Menzo on whether he has updated 11-

08/0644r5 (numbering spreadsheet)• TGp – Wayne

• Goal: get TGz and TGp to have updated the numbering spreadsheet by May 09 meeting.

• Then discuss at May Meeting, expectation TGv correct numbering.


March 2009


Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Amendment & other ordering notes

• Editors define publication order independent of working group public timelines:– Since official timeline is volatile and moves around

– Publication order helps provide stability in amendment numbering, figures, clauses and other numbering assignments

– Editors are committed to maintain a rational publication order

• Numbering spreadsheet 08/0644:– Succeeding amendments to do their respective updates

– Must match the official timeline


March 2009


Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Numbering of Annexes and Clauses

• Proposal: TGMb will fix the ordering of annexes– Ample bad precedent set by 11k

– Bibliography should be the final annex per IEEE Standards Style Guide

• Clause numbering has similar issue during rollup– TGn clause 3a, 11r clause 11a, 11y clause 11.9a

• REVmb numbering will stay using “Amendment style” numbering until the very last possible moment.


March 2009


Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

ANA Announcements• Current ANA announced to group is 802.11-09-0031r2.

– See https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/file/08/11-09-0031-02-0000-ana-database-assigned-numbers.xls

– All new requests received by end of meeting will be uploaded and announced via 802.11 WG reflector

• No requests have been received directly from editors this week and acted on in preparation for publishing next version.

• Others as may arise before the editors conference call #1 will be included

• Procedure for ANA is contained in 07/0827r0.– See http://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/public/07/11-07-0827-00-0000-assigned-number-authority-ana-mechanisms.ppt

• Editorial Guidance– ANA assignments should be done at the time of moving from WG LB to

Sponsor ballot.– If a resource number is not in the ANA Database, please use <ANA> in drafts!– Editors to replace any ANA controlled resources numbers with <ANA> upon

incorporation of material into drafts.


March 2009


Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Amendment Ordering

Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date

802.11 Amendment 4 TGw Sept 2009

802.11 Amendment 5 TGn Jan 2010

802.11 Amendment 6 TGz Jan 2010

802.11 Amendment 7 TGp June 2010

802.11 Amendment 8 TGv June 2010

802.11 Amendment 9 TGu May 2010

802.11 Amendment 10 TGs Sept 2010

802.11 Revision 802.11mb Mar 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 1 TGaa June 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 2 TGac Dec 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 3 TGad Dec 2012

• Data as of March 12 from 802.11 website. • See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm

Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!


March 2009


Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Email Your Draft Status Updates

• Each editor, please send update for next page via the editor’s reflector no later than Thursday am2 to update table on next page!


March 2009


Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Draft Development Snapshot Most current doc shaded green.

TG

Published or Draft Baseline DocumentsSource MEC

Style

Guide EditorSnapshot

Date802.11 k r y w n z p v u s mb aa

w 2007 2008 2008 2008 8.0 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Nancy Cam-Winget

10-Mar

n 2007 2008 2008 2008 7.0 8.00 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Adrian Stephens

10-Mar

z 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 3.0 Word No 2007 Menzo Wentink

17-July

p 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 2.0 5.02 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Wayne Fisher

11-Mar

v 2007 2008 2008 2008 6.0 7.0 2.0 4.0 4.01 2.0 2.0 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Emily Qi Nov

u 2007 2008 2008 11.0 6.0 6.04 - - 4.0 4.02 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Necati Canpolat

Nov

s 2007 2008 2008 2008 7.0 7.02 3.0 5.0 4.01 4.02 2.07 Frame 7.2 No 2007 Kazuyuki Sakoda

15-July

mb

- - - - - - - - - - - - No draft yet Adrian Stephens

15-July

aa No draft yet Vacant xx

T (1.01) Frame 6 No 2007 Tom Alexander

20 -Mar

Changes from last report shown in red.


March 2009


Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Editorial Streamlining• Focus is on consistency across all TGs:

– Completed• Streamlined ANA processes – 07/0827r0• Consistent format for REDLINE contributions across TGs – 07/0788r0 • Consistent process for editorial comment resolution across TGs (WG & Sponsor) –

07/2050r0– Guideline for technical vs. editorial, sample editorial comment responses

• Format for comment reporting across TGs (WG & Sponsor) – 07/1990r0 (tool in 07/2116r0)

• Stable numbering method (See 07/2810r0)• Consistent naming of redlines (See 07/2810r0)• Draft templates for FRAME (no Word) to help train new editors more rapidly

– Under Construction (in priority order)1. Revise the editor’s guideline2. Mentoring program – Name a mentor for each new editor3. Request in future Plenary sessions Mondays 7:30pm Frame surgery 4. MIB element numbering and compiling – publish a rolled-up MIB of k/r/y5. Guideline on non-technical front matter6. Guideline describing expected editorial development and maturity of draft through

stages in 802.11 for consistency across TGs7. Guidelines for primitives – ARC to consider


March 2009


Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Draft naming convention• Drafts and redlines are .pdf files• Syntax: Draft <project>_<draft> [Redline [Compared to <project>_<draft>]].pdf

• Examples:

• Draft P802.11n_D8.0.pdf• Draft P802.11n_D8.0 Redline.pdf• Draft P802.11n_D7.04 Redline Compared to P802.11n_D7.03.pdf

Please use this convention for all drafts posted on the 802.11 website.


March 2009


Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

AOB

• Nancy: participant lists. TGn, r, y all different.– How do we define contributor list?

– Is second list, all letter balloters, or 802.11 members, or sponsor balloters?

– Michelle: every group does it differently.

– Nancy: defer to chair

• Necati: any update on templates?– Michelle: need to do another update with new frontmatter (new

board members)

– Issues with numbering of pages.

– Action: Necati email to Michelle list of issues.


March 2009


Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Archive Material


March 2009


Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Publication Work PlanNote: to be included in the editor’s operations manual

Here is the workflow we have used for a number of years with IEEE staff on publication of 802.11 publications:

1. Editors provide FRAME source and any freestanding graphics (Powerpoint, Visio. TIF) to staff at time of REVCOM submission.

2. Editors provide a list of requests editorial corrections no later than REVCOM approval date.

3. Staff prepares a publication draft and highlights changes they have made and questions they need addressed or confirmed. This draft is sent to Task Group Editor and the Working Group Technical Editor (me). This typically occurs about 2-3 weeks after approval for publication, since the preparation work is usually (but not always) begun ahead of approval. This is also typically the draft peer reviewed by IEEE staff.

4. The Task Group Editor responds to all questions on domain specific questions, with copy to Working Group editor (me). This typically takes about 3-5 days.

5. The Working Group Technical Editor reviews responses from the Task Group editor, completes any responses, and provides a list of WG officers and voting members valid for the document as of the opening day of the Sponsor ballot. This typically only takes one additional day from the prior step as most of the work is done in parallel by the two editors.

6. Final draft is submitted by the IEEE staff to Working Group Technical Editor and Task Group Editor for sign-off. Any changes from the responses or IEEE peer review are highlighted and explained. This typically takes only one or two days more after the responses are received from the editors.

7. Task Group Editor gives final approval. No changes are expected. This usually occurs within 24 hours.

8. Working Group Technical Editor signs off and provides draft to Working Group Chair. No changes are expected. This usually occurs within 24 hours and in parallel with the previous step.

9. Working Group Chair sends email to sponsor and IEEE staff letting them know the Working Group has signed off on the publication process.


March 2009


Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Terry Cole on Changes to MIB elements

• You can incrementally add to a MIB element without deprecation at any level. That is, add new values and meaning pairs.

•

• You can change the description of a MIB element without deprecation at any level. That is add new text clarifying or even changing the meaning of the element to keep up with the standard.

•

• I would advise deprecation when changing the definition of some value of a MIB from one thing to another. However, I don't know of any rules requiring this.


March 2009


Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Publications: lessons learned

• When quoting baseline text inaccurately, the baseline text is changed whether or not the changes were marked. The IEEE staff will actually do the appropriate changes as if the task group had actually intended to change the baseline.– Drafts can minimally quote baseline text to minimize such changes– Should revisit the decision to include full context during insertion

• Full Annex titles have to be shown in the amendment; more importantly included “normative” vs. “informative”– TGk inadvertently changed Annex A to be fully informative– TGr battled to fix Annex A but caused ripples– TGy 08-1215r1 has brief review of significant things changed for

publication– In editor’s operations manual and during balloting, should comment that

Annexes should be fully titled with good reason to vote “No” in balloting


March 2009


Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Publications: lessons learned (cont’d)

• Acronym rules are inconsistent– Styleguide doesn’t include definitions– Every document is treated as standalone, thus first acronym reference

must be spelled out. Even though, other amendments or baseline may have defined and used the acronym earlier.

– Goal should be to have as few changes between the final balloted amendment and final published amendment.

• How do we deal with subjective decisions made by the IEEE copy editors as their styles vary?

• Booleans should be capitalized: TRUE and FALSE– when “set to”

• Booleans should be lower case: is true and is false (raise the issue with Style Guide update)


March 2009


Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13

Name Company Address Phone email

Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd

200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK

+44 1753 667099 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0367r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM

March 2009


Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

Closing report for Wireless Next Generation (WNG) Standing Committee

(SC) for March 2009, Vancouver, BC, Canada


March 2009


Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Presentations

• 11-09-0315-01-0wng-enhanced-security.ppt [Dan Harkins]– StrawPoll: A study group to develop a PAR and Five Criteria for Enhanced

Security for 802.11 should be created.

– Yes: 11, No: 1, Don’t know, Need more information:11, Don’t care: 6.

• 11-09-0338-00-0wng-enhancement-of-802-11-ad-hoc-mode.ppt [Chiu Ngo]– StrawPoll: Should IEEE 802.11 WNG receive further presentations on the

topic of performance improvement for IEEE 802.11 ad hoc mode?

– Yes: 10, No: 1, Abstain: 14

• 11-09-0337-00-0wng-802-next-generation-security.ppt [Richard Paine]

Discussion Point

• 11-09-0239-02-0wng-comments-on-802-22-input-to-08-260-petition-for-reconsideration.doc


March 2009


Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

ARC Mar ‘09 Summary Report

• Jan -> Mar:– Continued MAC breakdown work

• 3 tele confs extended model; • Shifting from component to functional orientation

• Mar F2F sessions– Advice request re MIBs

• Usage and inconsistency issues• Possible recommendation in development re MIB usage & SAP sequence data

flows– Proposal: Classification of mib vars into

• capability, status, control knob, “confused/mixed perceptions”• Internal/external to an entity

– MAC Functional Model Status • Updated snapshot in 9/118 “r latest” (will be updated after this week)

from slide 1 of 11-09/0333r1 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

March 2009


Slide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

ARC Planning for Mar -> May

• Conf Calls– Mar 31 18:00-19:00 ET

– Apr 14, Apr 28, 13:00-14:00 ET

• Next F2F sessions in May In Montreal

from slide 2 of 11-09/0333r1 by David Bagby, Calypso Ventures, Inc.

March 2009


Slide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

March 2009 Closing Report for TGmbDate: 2009-03-12

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Matthew Gast Trapeze Networks 5753 W. Las Positas Blvd,

Pleasanton, CA 94588 USA +1 (925) 474-2273 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0407r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks

March 2009


Slide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

Closing report for TGmb for March 2009 plenary meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.


March 2009


Slide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGmb Status

Photo credit: Ted Percival (tedpercival on Flickr); used with permission

http://www.flickr.com/photos/tedpercival/2621455898/

(Yes, we found an editor…)


March 2009


Slide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Accomplishments

• Elected Adrian Stephens as Technical Editor– Disbursed US$2.25 collected in fines for use of the word “editor”

– Adopted proposed editorial process

• Adopted new plan of record (see next slide)

• Continued processing comment spreadsheet– Discussed multi-BSS operation and power save

• Note: no interpretation requests were received


March 2009


Slide 35

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests

Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision• May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot

– (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009)• Sep/Nov 2009 – Recirc start• November 2009– Form Sponsor Pool• January 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start

– (Include all published amendments as of Jan 2010)• May 2010 – Sponsor Recirc• Jan 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval (conditional in Nov 2010)• Mar 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval


March 2009


Slide 36

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Plans for May Meeting and Beyond

• Goal: Letter ballot after May 2009 meeting in Montréal

• Teleconferences planned to work on remaining open issues– Schedule and topics to be announced after WG approval of

teleconferences

• TGmb editorial team is still seeking reviewers to assist in checking draft changes– See 11-09/0250r0 for process and time requirements


March 2009


Slide 37

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Documents

• Agenda: 11-09/0341r1

• Minutes: 11-09/0325r0

• Current issues list: 11-08/1127r13


March 2009

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGn Closing Report Vancouver, BC, Canada 802 Plenary

Date: 2009-03-13

Authors:

+1 (321)427-4098

5488 Marvell Lane,Santa Clara, CA, 95054

Name Company Address Phone email Bruce Kraemer Marvell

[email protected]

Sheung Li SiBEAM

[email protected]

Adrian Stephens

Intel Corporation

15 JJ Thompson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK

+1 (503)616-3800

[email protected]

555 Mathilda Ave,Sunnyvale, CA 94085

+1 (408)245-3120

from slide 1 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2009


Slide 39

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Sponsor Ballot Recirculation #1 on TGn

Sponsor recirculation ballot closed March 07 and passed with a 80.1% affirmative vote (169 approve, 42 not approve, 17 abstain)77 comments received

During March meeting, All comments resolved, and editor empowered to create TGn Draft 9.0 for further balloting


March 2009


Slide 40

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGn - Primary March Meeting Documents

• SB #1 Comment Composite 11-09- 0024 r5• Meeting Report 11-09- 0219 r10• Editors Report 11-09- 0251 r1• Closing Report 11-09- 0412 r0• Meeting Minutes 11-09- 0326 r0• TGn Draft 8.0


March 2009


Slide 41

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Mar ’09 to May ‘09 TGn Teleconference Plan

Wednesday Blocking events

Ad hoc group Meeting chair Bridge # Passcode

Mar 11 Plenary

Mar 18 5 2457232

Mar 25 W topics Bruce Kraemer 5 5282348

Apr 01 W topics Bruce Kraemer 5 5228709

Apr 08 5 9662615

Apr 15 5 3527796

Apr 22 5 3309270

Apr 29 5 3813773

May 06 5 7927018

May 13 Interim

Call number: 916-356-2663 Call time: 11:00 – 13:00 ET


March 2009


Slide 42

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGn Timeline is Unchanged

Event Name Accepted Dates

Actual Previously Approved

Currently Published

PAR Approved Sep ‘03Initial WG Letter Ballot Mar ‘06Recirculation WG Letter Ballot

Oct ‘07

Form Sponsor Ballot Pool Jul ‘08Initial Sponsor Ballot Dec ‘08 Nov ‘08 Jan ‘09Recirculation Sponsor Ballot

Feb ‘09 Jan ‘09 May ‘09

Final WG Approval Jul ‘09 Nov ‘09Final EC Approval Jul ‘09 Nov ‘09RevCom/ Stds Board Approval

Sep ‘09 Jan ‘10

Publication Nov ‘09 Mar ‘10from slide 5 of 11-09/0412r2 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

March 2009


Slide 43

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGp Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Stuart J. Kerry OK-Brit 1020 White Cloud Drive,

Morgan Hill, CA 95037, United States of America

+1 (408) 348-3171 [email protected]

Author:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0258r1 by Stuart J. Kerry (OK-Brit)

March 2009


Slide 44

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

TGp closing report for March 2009 meetings


March 2009


Slide 45

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

March 2009 TGp Meetings Summary

• All LB# 141 Comment resolutions completed (many revisited with altered resolutions this week as a result of CRs)

– Original LB# 141 comments received:

• 221 comments, 83 were editorial

• 6 two-hour time slots this week plus Monday 1.5 hour ad-hoc slot

• Current working draft is D5.02• Voted to go to WG recirculation ballot• Presentation in doc: 11-09/0395r1 was made regarding a WAVE

ITS Station Technical Capabilities Summary


March 2009


Slide 46

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Status

• Current draft D5.02 is on server

• Master Comment Resolution document 11-08-1452r6

• Represents LB# 141 CR changes from D5.0

• Plan to go to 2nd recirculation WG letter ballot• Weekly teleconferences planned for every Thursday @

15:00 ET - Piscataway time (commencing after letter ballot results are received, if 2nd recirculation LB approved by WG)


March 2009


Slide 47

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGp Timeline Update

IN PROCESS - Standards, Amendments, and Recommended Practices

Form Sponsor

Ballot (SB) Pool

MEC Done

IEEE-SA Sponsor Ballots (SBs)

Final 802.11 WG Approval

Final or (Conditional)

802 EC Approval

RevCom & Standards Board

Final or Continuous

Process ApprovalANSI

Approved

Superseded or Withdrawn by Standards

Board

Initial Recirculation

Draft Date Draft DateMar-09May-09

Mar-09May-09

May-09Jul-09

Sep-09N/C

Jan-10N/C

Mar-10N/C

Jun-10N/C

N/AN/C

N/AN/C

Note:

• March 2009 session changes shown in Red on above chart

• N/C = No Change


March 2009


Slide 48

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGp Motion to start 2nd Recirculation WG LBMotion:• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received

from LB# 141 on 802.11 TGp Draft 5.0 as contained in document 11-08-1452-06-000p (TGp Comment Resolutions),

• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 6.0 incorporating these resolutions and,• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question

“Should P802.11 TGp Draft 6.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”

Moved by Stuart J. Kerry on behalf of TGp

TGp vote:

Moved: Alastair Malarky, Seconded: Wayne Fisher, Result: 8-0-1


March 2009


Slide 49

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGs Vancouver Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0365r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola

March 2009


Slide 50

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

Report of TGs, Mesh Networking Task Group, to the March 2009 (Vancouver, British Columbia) 802.11 Closing Plenary.

TGs Motto: Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add but when there is nothing left to take away.


March 2009


Slide 51

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGs Closing Plenary Report• TGs has achieved its goals for this meeting of

(1) completing resolution of all comments on its Draft D2.0 from LB #126 and (2) voting to go to Letter Ballot again.

• The current TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-08/493r43 and shows the resolution of all comments.

• Sony Corporation has agreed to continue sponsorship of Kazuyuki Sakoda as TGs temporary Editor through the end of 2009.


March 2009


Slide 52

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGs Closing Plenary Report

• TGs requests a 15 day procedural Letter Ballot to approve going to Working Group Letter Ballot with Draft D3.0.

• TGs requests Working Group approval for an ad hoc meeting Sunday, 10 May, in Montreal, Quebec, to work on comment resolution.

• TGs is holding teleconferences some Wednesdays through the July Plenary at 10:00 for up to 1 ½ hours. Dates: 6 May, 27 May, 10 June, 24 June, 8 July


March 2009


Slide 53

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGs Closing Plenary Report

• An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting is available in 11-09/205r13. The draft minutes will be posted shortly as 11-09/312r0.

• Goal for the May 2009 TGs meeting in Montreal, Quebec:– Start resolving new Letter Ballot comments.


March 2009


Slide 54

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

End of Report


March 2009


Slide 55

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13

Name Company Address Phone email

Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd

200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK

+44 1753 667099 [email protected]

Authors:


March 2009


Slide 56

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for March 2009,

Vancouver, BC, Canada


March 2009


Slide 57

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

• Re-circulation Letter Ballot 142 progress– Resolved all comments this week

– 10 submissions

– Ask WG for a 15 day re-circulation letter ballot

• Teleconferences– 15th April 2009 1hr 11 ET

– 22nd April 2009 1hr 11 ET

– 29th April 2009 2hr 11 ET

– 6th May 2009 2hr 11 ET

• Liaison– Reply to 3GPP CT1 regarding TGu elements for ANDSF (Access

Network Discovery and Selection Function)

• Plans for May 2009– LB comment resolutions


March 2009


Slide 58

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave

Sunnyvale, CA 94089

+1 630-363-1389

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0399r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

March 2009


Slide 59

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This document contains the TGv closing report for March 2009.


March 2009


Slide 60

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Goals and Accomplishments

• Comment resolution from LB 140– Completed resolution of LB 140 comments

• Letter Ballot

• Acknowledgements– Thanks to David Goodall, for serving as secretary


March 2009


Slide 61

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Comment Processing Summary

Total 586

Technical 418

Editorial 168

Editor Done/To Do 306/280

Comment resolutions adopted to date 586

Comments remaining 0


March 2009


Slide 62

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Documents for 08/1467 comment resolutionCategory Volunteers Document

Annex S. McCann 09-0014

Collocated Interference Jari Jokela, Jing Zhu 09-0021

Diagnostics D. Stanley 09-0036

Event Joe Kwak 09-0194

FMS A. Thomson 09-0049

General D. Stanley 09-0009, 0019

Multicast Diagnostics Alex Ashley 09-0082, 0135

Location/Timing A. Thomson/Ganesh 09-0048, 0133

Proxy ARP D. Stanley 09-0028

Roaming Management Emily Qi 09-0116

SleepMode Emily Qi 09-0117

STA Statistics Y. Seok, G. Venkatsan 09-0109, 0131

TFS Emily Qi 09-0006

TIM Broadcast M. Wentink 09-0164

Traffic Generation Moo-Ryong Jeong 09-0169

Virtual AP Qi Wang 09-0069

TCLAS G. Venkatsan 09-0008

Channel Usage E. Qi 09-0005

Directed Multicast E. Qi 09-0007

Resolutions # CID # remaining

1/13, 1/6 5 0

1/13, LA 16 0

LA 19 0

LA 51 0

LA 28 0

LA 42 0

LA 14 0

LA 55/72 0

LA 4 0

LA 13 0

LA 19 0

LA 8 0

1/6 6 0

LA 16 0

LA 13 0

LA 27 0

1/6 1 0

1/6 3 0

LA 20 0


March 2009


Slide 63

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Output Documents

• 11-09-0399-00-000v-TGv-March-2009-closing-report.ppt

• 11-09-0215-07-000v-March-2009-agenda.ppt

• 11-09-0400-00-000v-March 2009 meeting notes


March 2009


Slide 64

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Motion

• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB140 on TGv Draft 4.0, instruct the editor to prepare Draft 5.0 incorporating these resolutions and

• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should TGv Draft 5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”

• Mover: Allan Thomson• Seconder: Qi Wang• Result: 5-0-0


March 2009


Slide 65

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2008 • Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed

– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0

• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)

• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: June 09• Initial Sponsor Ballot: Sept 09

– Sept 09 – D7.0

• Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09– Nov 09 – D8.0, Jan 09 - D9.0, Feb D10.0, March D11.0– May 12th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval

• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 • RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 4th/June 5th(or so)• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010


March 2009


Slide 66

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Goals for May 2009

• Comment resolution

• Recirculation Letter Ballot


March 2009


Slide 67

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

References


March 2009


Slide 68

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

IEEE 802.11 TGw March Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-11

Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,

Hillsboro, OR USA +1-712-1849 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0406r0 by Jesse Walker, Intel Corporation

March 2009


Slide 69

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This presentation contains the closing report for the March 2009 meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGw


March 2009


Slide 70

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

March Meeting Objectives

• March Meeting Objectives– Schedule Teleconferences

– Discuss Public Action frames issue


March 2009


Slide 71

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Accomplishments

• Voted to rescind decision to initiate a Sponsor Ballot recirculation for P802.11w D8.0

– The resolution adopted in D8 breaks P802.11n Coexistence Management– Due to conflicting requirements on Public Action frames from different task groups

• Appear to reach a tentative consensus resolution of the Public Action Frame issue:

– 802.11w should create no problems for 802.11n for unicast Public Action frames, as protection is not required between two STAs for which a security association does not exist. Resolution: clarify the P802.11w draft.

– It is the intent of TGw that broadcast unprotected Management frames with a wildcard BSSID will be received. Resolution: clarify the P802.11w draft.

– The rules for setting the BSSID field of the Public Action frame may require work in TGn. For example, setting it to the transmitters BSSID probably doesn’t work. The rules for receiving and filtering Public Action frames based on the BSSID field need to be clarified. Resolution: TGn to clarify the P802.11n draft


March 2009


Slide 72

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Submissions

• 11-09/386r1 – Open report and agenda

• 11-09/388r0 – Meeting Minutes (Peter Yee)

• 11-09/406 – Closing Report


March 2009


Slide 73

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Teleconferences

• For 1 hour, on Wednesdays at 12:00 ET, through 1 week past the IEEE 802.11 May 2009 Interim Meeting except for:– March 23


March 2009


Slide 74

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Motion

• Motion: Move that the recirculation of P802.11w D8.0 be rescinded

• Mover: Allan Thomson

• Seconder: Stephen McCann

• Result: 9-1-0, motion passes


March 2009


Slide 75

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

May Meeting Planning

• Objectives– Comment Resolution for Recirculation Sponsor Ballot

• Conference Call(s)


March 2009


Slide 76

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGz Vancouver Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13

Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,

Breukelen, the Netherlands

+31-65-183-6231

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0415r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)

March 2009


Slide 77

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGz Accomplishments

• TGz generated proposed resolutions for 68% of the LB143 comments– The resolutions are in 11-09-0313-01-000z

– 51 comments left (41 technical)

• Special thanks to Yongho Seok for filling in as the secretary this week!


March 2009


Slide 78

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGz Goals for Montreal

• The goal for Montreal is to continue to work on LB143 comment resolution


March 2009


Slide 79

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Vancouver, British Columbia Closing Report

Date: 2009-03-12

Authors:

Name Affiliation Address Phone email Ganesh Venkatesan

Intel Corporation

JF3-336 2111NE 25th Ave

+1 503 334 6720

[email protected]

from slide 1 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

March 2009


Slide 80

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This submission summarizes TGaa the activities of TGaa in the IEEE 802.11 Vancouver Session (March 2009).

Slide 80from slide 2 of 11-09/0384r1 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation

March 2009


Slide 81

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Alex Ashley – for volunteering to be TGaa secretary for the entire week.

Recognition


March 2009


Slide 82

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Since the Los Angeles session:• 2 Teleconferences focused on (a) OBSS and (b)

Reliable Multicast.Goals for the Vancouver Session:

• OBSS Adopt formal definition of OBSS for TGaa Listen, review and adopt OBSS solution into the TGaa draft

• Listen, review, down select and adopt Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) into TGaa draft

• Jointly meet with 802.1AVB: Discuss 802.11 specific input to DMN specification Discuss viability of the ‘drop precedence’ idea

Snapshot


March 2009


Slide 83

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

• OBSS Listened to four presentations on OBSS in the context of TGaa Started discussions on a strategy and plan for OBSS

• Reliable Multicast Reviewed the harmonized set of Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) Listened to 2 additional proposals on reliable multicast Adopted harmonized Reliable Multicast mechanism(s) into TGaa

draft

• Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB How to accommodate SRP in 802.11? Strategies for priority levels, precedence levels and drop

precedence• Teleconference schedule• Minutes from the session are in document 09//371r0

What we did this week?


March 2009


Slide 84

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Plans for the Montreal (May 2009) Session

In upcoming teleconferences• Layout a OBSS strategy and plan

• MRG discussions

• Additional mechanisms for Reliable Multicast

• Address other topics from TGaa PAR

Plans for May ‘09 (Montreal) Meeting• Continue activities from teleconferences

• Technical presentations on TGaa PAR topics

• Review and improve TGaa draft


March 2009


Slide 85

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Teleconferences

Bi-weekly on Mondays between 1100-1230Hrs ET, starting March 23rd 2009 till July 27th, 2009.

Schedule will be announced in the TGaa reflector soon.


March 2009


Slide 86

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Background details


March 2009


Slide 87

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Technical Presentations

1. Distributed Channel Assignment 09/285r0 Andrew Myles2. OBSS Analysis of Channel Requirements 08/1470r4 Graham Smith3. Overlapping BSS Proposal 09/230r0 Graham Smith4. OBSS OSQAP QoS Issues 09/347r0 Graham Smith5. Efficient Error Control Using Network Coding for Multicast Transmission 09/277r0

Kevin Rhee6. Feedback-jamming Multicast ARQ 09/.290r0 Jochen Miroll7. Quasi-reliable Multicast 09/247r0 Jochen Miroll8. More Reliable GroupCast Proposal Present 09/340r0 Hang Liu9. Drop Precedence in wireless, wired-wireless networks* 09/264r0 Alex Ashley10. AVB DMN and 802.11 09/0403r0 Philippe Klein11. Group addressed normative text 08/1244r2

Slide 87

* Discussed at the joint meeting with 802.1AVB


March 2009


Slide 88

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

What is OBSS?OBSS Definitions:•OBSS edge -- Any two APs operating in the same channel and can hear each other (either directly or via a STA associated to one of the APs)

•OBSS Graph – is a graph where APs are nodes of the graph and the edges are OBSS edges and every AP with in the OBSS graph can be connected via one or more OBSS APs to every other AP in the OBSS graph

•Length(OBSS graph) – longest shortest path between any two APs in the OBSS graph

•Size(OBSS graph) – number of nodes (APs) in the OBSS graph

Scope of TGaa OBSS Solution (proposed in Los Angeles session) –

if length(OBSS graph) <= 2 and the size(OBSS graph) <=3 , enable the OBSS QAP solution otherwise (a) backoff to legacy (non .11aa) mode or (b) use a different solution


March 2009


Slide 89

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Issues with the scope of OBSS solution?

(a)Length (OBSS graph) <= 2 is insufficient? – 2.4GHz band has only 3 channels and suffers in OBSS environment.

It is not in the scope of TGaa OBSS solution– If the number of channels is > 17, a length of greater than 2 is

improbable– A length of 7 or 8 is common in dense deployments if the number of

available channels is limited 9 or 11. This condition could be mitigated by having the QAPs fall back from 40MHz to 20MHz channels. Should TGaa specify a mechanism for this?

– Is a mechanism/solution that only addresses the scope as defined acceptable (despite the fact that consistent performance will not be met) as an incremental step over legacy?

(b)If a length of 7 or 8 is accepted to be the scope of the solution, it is not any simpler than the general OBSS problem (which is considered NP-Hard)


March 2009


Slide 90

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGac March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-12

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Osama Aboul-Magd Nortel Networks 3500 Carling Avenue

Ottawa, ONT, Canada K2H-8E9

613-763-5827 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0409r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks

March 2009


Slide 91

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGac for the March 2009 session


March 2009


Slide 92

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Submissions• 09/0305r0, “TGac Status and Timeline” Osama Aboul-Magd, Nortel Networks • 09/0161r2, “Usage Models”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/0059r3, “Proposed Selection Procedure”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/0306, “Proposal Regarding .11ac Evaluation approach”, Rolf De Vegt, Qualcomm• 09/307r1,” Evaluation of AoD and AoA for TGac Channel Models”, Hemanth Sampath,

Qualcomm• 09/364r0, “Comments on AOA and AOD Selection for a Multi-User SDMA Network”, JT

Chen, Ralink Technology • 09/308r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document”, Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm • 09/309r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document Highlights”, Hemanth Sampath,

Qualcomm• 09/308r1, “TGac Channel Model Addendum Document”, Hemanth Sampath, Qualcomm• 09/345r0, “Indoor Channel Measurements for TGac ”, Minho Cheong, ETRI• 09/343r0, “W-PAN Structures Inside an OFDMA/SDMA W-LAN ”, JT Chen, Ralink

Technology • 09/0303r0, “Effect of SDMA in IEEE 802.11ac”, Naoki Honma, Kentaro Nishimori, Riichi

Kudo, Yasushi Takatori (NTT) • 09/0304r0, “TGac Functional Requirements”, Peter Loc, Ralink and Minho Cheong, ETRI• 09/0376, “Proposal for TGac Evaluation Methodology”, Minho Cheong and Peter Loc


March 2009


Slide 93

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Work Completed• Election of two Vice Chairs

– Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)– Joonsuk Kim (Broadcom)

• Two TG motions passed– Accept 09-059r4 as the TGac baseline document for the selection procedure– Accept 09-0161r4 as the TGac baseline document for usage models

• Channel Models– Number of contributions related to channel models were presented– More work is needed before the TG accept a channel model baseline document.– Work is to continue on conference calls

• Functional Requirements– Agreed to include comparison criteria and simulation scenarios in the functional

requirements document– Work is to continue on conference calls

• Specification Framework– No relevant submissions.


March 2009


Slide 94

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

March 2009 Goals• Functional Requirements

– Continue the functional Requirement discussion with the aim to have a first draft available by March.

• Channel Models– Continue the discussion on the channel models.– Converge the different views on the channel models.

• Specification Framework– Initial view on the outline of the document

• Selection Procedure– Continue to refine the selection procedure described as needed

• Usage Models– Continue to refine usage models as needed.

• Technical Submissions


March 2009


Slide 95

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Conference Call Times

• Bi-Weekly, alternating with TGad• March 26

– 11:00 – 13:00 ET

• April 9– 20:00 -22:00 ET

• April 23– 11:00 – 13:00 ET

• May 7– 20:00 – 22:00 ET

• Possible Topics– Channel Models– Functional Requirements


March 2009


Slide 96

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

TGad March 2009 Closing ReportDate: 2009-03-13

Name Company Address Phone email Eldad Perahia Intel

Corporation

2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124

503-712-8081 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1 of 11-09/0410r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

March 2009


Slide 97

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGad for the March 2009 plenary session.


March 2009


Slide 98

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Work Completed• Task Group document development

– TGad Functional Requirements, 09/0228r1, Eldad Perahia– TGad Channel Model Requirements, 09/0323r0, Vinko Erceg– TGad Evaluation Methodology, 09/0296r1, Eldad Perahia

• Channel Modeling– Deterministic Channel Modeling for 60 GHz WLAN, 09/302r0, Martin Jacob– Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, 09/336r0 & 09/334r0, Alexander Maltsev

• Joint 802.15.3c/TGad meeting– Common mode signaling (CMS) for intersystem coexistence enhancement, 09/0370r0,

Shu Kato– IEEE 802.15.3c DEV sync frame transmission for adjacent piconet coexistence,

09/0372r1, Zhou Lan– Tg3c beamforming overview, 11-09/0355r1, Ismail Lakkis– Introduction of TG3c channel model and beyond, 11-09/0375r1, Hirokazu Sawada– Review of TG3c Coexistence Assurance Document, James P. F. Gilb

• 15-09/0022r8, CA document• 15-09/0184r1, response to 802.19 comments• 15-09/0078r1, changes to CA document

• Technical submission– Implication of usage models on TGad network architecture, 09/0391r0, Carlos Cordeiro


March 2009


Slide 99

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Goals for May

• Continue working on task group documents– Motion initial draft of functional requirements &

evaluation methodology

• Technical contributions• Joint meeting w/ 802.15.3c

– TGad responses to March 802.15.3c presentations

– (suggested activities from minutes of March 15.3c/TGad joint meeting)


March 2009


Slide 100

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Conference call times

• Bi-weekly, alternate with TGac

• April 2 – – 11:00-13:00 ET

– Channel modeling

• April 16 -– 20:00-22:00 ET

– Channel modeling

• April 30 –– 11:00-13:00 ET

– Task group documents


March 2009


Slide 101

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

JTC1 Ad Hoc January 2009 Closing Report

Date: 2009-10-20

Name Company Address Phone email Jesse Walker Intel Corporation 2111 N.E. 25th Ave,

Hillsboro, OR USA +1-503-712-1849

[email protected]

Authors:


March 2009


Slide 102

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Abstract

This presentation summarizes the March 2009 meeting of the IEEE 802.11 JTC1 Ad Hoc.


March 2009


Slide 103

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

JTC1 March Meeting Goals

• Meeting Objectives for Vancouver– Complete and ratify liaison letter: 11-09/0168 “Response to

Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC”

– Develop response to 11-09/207r0, 11-09/208r0, and 11-09/209r0

– Decide whether to progress 802.11-2007 to fast track


March 2009


Slide 104

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Accomplishments and Decisions

• Decided to follow advice from IEEE staff to defer progressing IEEE 802.11-2007 to ISO/IEC fast track ballot– IEEE staff and ISO negotiating issues with PSDO

• Completed 11-09/0168 “Response to Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC” and requesting 802.11 WG to forward to EC for approval

• Completed 11-09/0351r1, “Response to liaison request to the IEEE 802 LMSC from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to review documents 6N13774, 6N13775, and 6N13776”

• Began forming WG position for the June 2009 SC6 Meeting in Tokyo


March 2009


Slide 105

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Documents

• 11-09/0350r1 – Agenda and Opening Report

• 11-09/404r0 – Meeting Minutes

• 11-09/168r6 – Liaison letter from P. Nikolich/EC responding to request from SC6

• 11-09/351r1 – Liaison letter from IEEE 802.11 Task Group reiterating WG position of 11-08/1166


March 2009


Slide 106

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Motion

• Motion: Move to forward doc. 11-09/0168r6, the liaison letter “Response to Liaison Letter 6N13770 from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to the IEEE 802 LMSC”, to the IEEE 802 LMSC Executive Committee for its approval

• Mover: Donald Eastlake III

• Seconder: Peter Yee



March 2009


Slide 107

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

Motion

• Motion: Move to send doc. 11-09/0351r1, a liaison letter to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 from the IEEE 802.11 Working Group, “Response to liaison request to the IEEE 802 LMSC from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 WG1 to review documents 6N13774, 6N13775, and 6N13776”

• Mover: Peter Yee

• Seconder: Donald Eastlake III



March 2009


Slide 108

doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0397r0

Submission

May Meeting Planning

• Objectives– Develop positions for June SC6 meeting


Date post:	12-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	ophelia-wood
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times