Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0 Report May 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 802.11 Mar...

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

May 2010

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1

802.11 Mar 2010 Closing Plenary Reports

Date: 2010-05-20

Name Company Address Phone email Adrian Stephens Intel

Corporation +44 792 008

4900 (mobile)

[email protected]

Authors:

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

May 2010

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 2

Abstract

• This document is a digest of the closing reports of all 802.11 sub-groups for presentation at the May 2010 closing plenary meeting.

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 3

802.11 WG Editor’s Meeting (May ‘10)

Date: 2010-05-16

Name Affiliation Address Phone email Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems [email protected]

Authors:

Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 1/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 4

Volunteer Editor Contacts• TGp – Wayne Fisher – [email protected]

• TGs – Kazuyuki Sakoda - [email protected]

• TGu – Necati Canpolat – [email protected]

• TGv – Emily Qi – [email protected]

• TGz – Menzo Wentink– [email protected]

• TGmb – Adrian Stephens – [email protected] (TBC)

• TGaa – Hang Liu – [email protected]

• Editor Emeritus:

– TGk – Joe Kwak– [email protected]

– TGn – Adrian Stephens – [email protected]

– TGr – Bill Marshall – [email protected]

– TGw – Nancy Cam-Winget – [email protected]

– TGy – Peter Ecclesine – [email protected]


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 5

Editor Amendment Ordering

Amendment Number Task Group REVCOM Date

802.11 Amendment 6 TGp June 2010

802.11 Amendment 7 TGz Sept 2010

802.11 Amendment 8 TGv Sept 2010

802.11 Amendment 9 TGu Sept 2010

802.11 Revision 802.11mb June 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 1 TGs Sept 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 2 TGae Oct 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 3 TGaf Dec 2011

802.11-2011 Amendment 4 TGaa Sept 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 5 TGac Dec 2012

802.11-2011 Amendment 6 TGad Dec 2012

• Data as of May 2010• See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/802.11_Timelines.htm

Amendment numbering is editorial! No need to make ballot comments on these dynamic numbers!


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Most current

doc shaded green.

TG

Published or Draft Baseline DocumentsSource MEC

Style Guide Editor

Snapshot Date

802.11

k r y w n p Z v u mb s aa af

p 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 Word Yes 2007 Wayne Fisher 16-Mar

z 2007 2008 2008 2008 10.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Frame 7.2 Yes 2009 Menzo Wentink

17-July

v 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 7.0 10.0 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Emily Qi 18-May

u 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 7.0 10.0 9.0 Frame 7.2 Yes 2007 Necati Canpolat

18-May

mb

2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 3.01 Frame 7.2 No 2009 Adrian Stephens

18-May

s 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 7.0 9.0 8.03 5.0 Frame 8.0 No 2009 Kazuyuki Sakoda

18-May

aa 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 5.0 0.05 Word No 2009 Hang Liu 18-May

af 2007 2008 2008 2008 2009 2009 11.0 8.0 10.0 9.0 5.0 0.04 0.02 Frame 7.1 No 2009 Peter Ecclesine

18-May

Changes from last report shown in red.

Slide 6

May 2010 Draft Development Snapshot

Slide 6 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 4/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Pre-RevCom IEEE-SA Review

• Possibly near the end of Working Group Letter Ballot (3rd recirc or 4th recirc) , we will offer the draft to the publications editor for review. This allows ambiguities and errors to be addressed in Sponsor Ballot by comments, rather than discover the ambiguities and errors after RevCom.

• It appears that during MEC is the least risky time for a publication editor’s review.

• TGs Draft 7.0 is expected out of July plenary, and by agreement with ExCom and IEEE SA staff, will go for professional editing for ~50 days, after which Draft 8.0 will be available to start Sponsor Ballot.

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 7from slide 5/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

802.11 Style Guide

• See 11-09-1034-00-0000-wg11-style-guide.doc

Slide 8 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 6/6 of 11-10/0598r2 by Peter Ecclesine (Cisco Systems)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 9

TGm Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Montemurro Research in Motion 4701 Tahoe Blvd.

Mississauga, ON. Canada. L4W 0B4

+1-905-629-4746 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/7 of 11-10/0659r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research in Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGm Task Group for the May 2010 session.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Accomplishments

• No interpretation requests received

• Elected TG Officers: Dorothy Stanley is new Chair

• Completed LB162 Comment Resolution– 20 - Editorial

– 129 - Technical

• Approved Recirculation Ballot following this session

• Scheduled Teleconference calls on June 18 and July 9 at 10 am ET for 2 hrs.

• No change to end date of plan of record


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Goals for July

• Resolve comments from recirculation ballot

• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool

• Obtain conditional approval to go to Sponsor Ballot


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Current TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests

Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot Nov 2009 – Recirc start• July 2010 – Conditional Sponsor Ballot Approval from EC• August 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days)• September 2010 – Sponsor Ballot start.• December 2010 – Sponsor Recirc. start• March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval• June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Motion Number 92

• Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from the working group ballot on P802.11REVmb D3.0,

• Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 4.0 incorporating these resolutions and,

• Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11REVmb D4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”

• By: Adrian Stephens

• Second: Jon Rosdahl

• Result: 5 – yes; 0 – no; 0 – abstain. Motion passes

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 14from slide 6/7 of 11-10/0659r0 by Michael Montemurro, RIM

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


References

• Agenda: 11-10/503r4

• Motions: 11-10/658r0

• Minutes: 11-10/0629r0


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGs Beijing Closing ReportDate: 2010-05-20

Author:

Name Address Affiliation Phone Email

Dee Denteneer HTC 37; 5656 AE Eindhoven; The Netherlands

Philips +31 40 2749743

[email protected]

from slide 1/4 of 11-10/0676r0 by Dee Denteneer

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

TGs closing report for the May 2010 meeting.

Resolved outstanding comments and ready to go to recirculation.

from slide 2/4 of 11-10/0676r0 by Dee Denteneer

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Status• TGs passed LB 161 with 89% approval rate (April

2010)

• Before the meeting:

• Comment resolution spreadsheet 11-10/0478r0

• About 400 comments (65%T-35%E)

• Most recent TGs Draft is D5.0

• After meeting

• Most recent TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-10/0478r7, with resolutions to all comments

• An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting in 11-10/0519r7

• The TGs draft minutes will be uploaded as 11-10/0675r0 from slide 3/4 of 11-10/0676r0 by Dee Denteneer

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Thursday, 20 May 2010 16:00 – 18:00

• Motion:– Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments

received from LB#161 on P802.11s Draft 5.0 as contained in document 11-10/478r0,

– Instruct the editor to prepare Draft 6.0 incorporating these resolutions and,

– Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should P802.11s Draft 6.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”

• Moved by Dee Denteneer on behalf of TGs

• TGs vote: – Moved: Dan Harkins Seconded: Rene Purnadi Result: y: 10-n:0-a:0

from slide 4/4 of 11-10/0676r0 by Donald Eastlake 3rd, Stellar Switches

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Closing ReportDate: 2010-05-20

Name Company Address Phone email

Stephen McCann Research in Motion (RIM) UK Ltd

200 Bath Road, Slough, Berkshire, SL1 3XE, UK

+44 1753 667099 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0656r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for May 2010,

Beijing, PRC


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


• 1st Re-circ Sponsor Ballot progress– Resolved all comments this week.

• 11-10-0480-08-000u-d9-0-1st-recirc-comments-spreadsheet.xls

– 2nd re-circulation sponsor ballot late May 2010

• Teleconferences– Wednesdays at 11:00am ET, 2 hours

– 30th June, 7th July, 21st July, 28th July

• Plans for July 2010– Resolve subsequent re-circ sponsor ballot comments

– Conditional RevCom approval


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


March 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2010-05-20

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dorothy Stanley Aruba Networks 1322 Crossman Ave

Sunnyvale, CA 94089

+1 630-363-1389

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/8 of 11-10/0661r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document contains the TGv closing report for May 2010.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Goals and Accomplishments

• Comment resolution from Second Recirculation Sponsor Ballot– 1181 comments, 1181 resolutions completed, 0 remain

• Teleconferences• June 10, 15, 17, 29, July 1

• 2pm Eastern (11am Pacific)

• 2 hours


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Output Documents

• 11-10-0661-00-000v-TGv-May-2010-closing-report.ppt

• 11-10-0523-03-000v-tgv-May-2010-agenda.ppt

• 11-10-0594-00-000v-TGv-Meeting-Minutes-May-2010.doc


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGv Timeline – Updated March, 2010

• Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed– Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0

• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0)– Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged)

• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09

• Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09– Oct 09 – D7.0 Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09

– Jan 09 – D8.0, D9.0, March D10.0, May D11.0, June D11.0 (unchanged)

– 20 August Revcom for Sept approval (was May/ June)

• Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010

• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: September 2010 (was June 2010)

• Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Goals for May 10 - July 2010

• Recirculation Sponsor Ballot

• Resolve comments from Recirculation Sponsor Ballot

• Subsequent Recirculation Sponsor Ballot


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Motion

• Move to approve the TGv PAR extension in 11-10-0592-01-000v-par-extension.doc, extending the TGv PAR for an additional 1 year, and request the 802.11 WG to forward the PAR Extension Request to NESCOM.

• Mover: Allan Thomson

• Seconder: Qi Wang

• Result: 3-0-0 Passes


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


References


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGz Beijing May 2010 Closing ReportDate: 20 May 2010

Name Company Address Phone email Menzo Wentink Qualcomm Straatweg 66,

Breukelen, the Netherlands

+31-65-183-6231

[email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/2 of 11-10/0670r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGz Accomplishments in Orlando

• Resolved all of the comments received on the second recirculation sponsor ballot– The approved comment resolutions are in 11-10/506r3

• Approved a 15-day recirculation sponsor ballot to start when the editor has prepared TGz draft 9.0

• Approved the following teleconferences:– June 3, 10, 17, 24

– July 1, 8

– Start time 2pm ET, for 2 hours

Slide 32from slide 2/2 of 11-10/0670r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

802.11aa – Robust Audio Video Transport Streaming Beijing, China Closing Report

Date: 2010-05-20

Authors:

Name Affiliation Address Phone email Ganesh Venkatesan Intel Corporation JF3-336 2111NE 25th Ave +1 503 334 6720 Ganesh.Venkatesan@intel

.com Alex Ashley NDS Ltd One London Road, Staines,

Middlesex, TW18 4EX, England

+44 1784 848770 [email protected]

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 33from slide 1/7 of 11-10/0644r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation et al

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Goals for the Beijing Meeting:• Listen to technical proposal(s)• Complete Draft 0.05 comment resolution• Approve Draft1.0 and kickoff WG letter Ballot

Snapshot


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Technical Presentations

Slide 35 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 35

Document number Title Author(s)

1 10/219r3Solution Choices for Interworking with 802.1Qat

Ganesh Venkatesan

2 tbdDraft 0.04 Internal Review Comments

TGaa members

3 09/1183r1 Resolution to Draft 0.02 Internal Review Comment #3

Brian Hart

4 10/3{19,20}r0 Improving MRG with DMS Brian Hart

5 10/304r0Empirical Formulae for EDCA overhead factor

Graham Smith

6Designated MSRP Node handling on 802.11 Network

Philippe Klien

Document number Title Author(s)

1 10/541r1Extending 11v QoS Traffic Capability

Alex Ashley

2 10/457r1Recommendation for EDCA Overhead Factor

Graham Smith

3 10/484r3Draft0.03 Internal Review Comment Resolutions

Ganesh Venkatesan

4 10/137r3Interworking with 802.1Qat – 802.11 specific changes

Ganesh Venkatesan

5 10/458r0 MIB Style guide Alex Ashley

6 10/606r0 Location for the DEI bit Alex Ashley

from slide 3/7 of 11-10/0644r0 by Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel Corporation et al

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Officer Election

• Chair – Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel)

• Vice Chair – Alex Ashley (NDS)

• Secretary – Ganesh Venkatesan (Intel)

• Technical Editor – Hang Liu (Technicolor)


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 37

Accomplishments

• Discussed and resolved comments on Draft 0.03, Draft 0.04 and Draft 0.05

• Approved comment resolutions and empowered editor to generate Draft 1.0

• WG Letter Ballot to start once Draft 1.0 is ready


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 38

Teleconferences

Bi-Weekly Monday 1100-1230 Hrs EDT

June 21


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 39

Plans for July 2010 meeting

Resolve Letter Ballot Comments


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGac May 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2010-05-20

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Osama Aboul-Magd Samsung Electronics 613-599-5078 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGac for the May 2010 session.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Work Completed• Continued with the Ad Hoc group meetings. Ad Hoc group reports are

available at:– MAC Ad Hoc report 11-10-0625r0– PHY Ad Hoc report 11-10-0571r1– MU-MIMO Ad Hoc report 11-10-0570r3– Coexistence Ad Hoc report 11-10-0624r4

• Motions passed to update the TG Specification Framework in areas related to:

– MU-MIMO GroupID.– PHY-related motions on SU MCS, Subcarrier, Tone Allocation, P-Matrix, VHT

SIG bit allocation, etc.– 160 MHz PHY transmission.

• The current approved revision of the specification Framework is 09/0992r11

• Accepted a new revision of the TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

TG Approved Documents

• 11-09-059r5 is the approved TGac Selection Procedure document.

• 11-09-0161r2 is the approved TGac Usage Model document .

• 11-09-308r12 is the approved TGac Channel Models Addendum document.

• 11-09-0451r14is the approved TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document

• 09-0992r11 is the approved TGac Specification Framework document.

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 43from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0671r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


July 2010 Goals

• Continue the work on the Specification Framework document and its related functional blocks.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Conference Call Times

• PHY telecon schedule– June 24, 10:00 – 11:00 EDT

• MAC telecon schedule– Thursday, June 17, 10:00 – 11:00 EDT

– Wednesday, June 30, 21:00 – 22:00 EDT

• Coexistence telecon schedule– Thursday, June 24, 20:00 – 21:00 EDT

• MU-MIMO telecon schedule– Thursday, June 17, 20:00 – 21:00 EDT


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGad May 2010 Closing ReportDate: 2009-05-21

Name Company Address Phone email Eldad Perahia Intel

Corporation

2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124

503-712-8081 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/9 of 11-10/0558r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document is the closing report for TGad for the May 2010 session.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Work Completed

• Complete proposals presentations• New Technique proposal presentations• Vote to confirm 10/433r2 as TGad D0.1 passed 68/0/1 !!!!!• TGad will be having an internal comment submission period

– Internal comment submission and resolution guidelines, 10/648r1– Comment submission period will open Friday, June 04, 2010, 23:59 EDT– Comment submission period will close Friday, June 25, 2010, 23:59 EDT– Email notification will be sent to the server

• Editor election– Carlos Cordeiro elected as TGad Editor, by acclamation

• Channel Modeling– Enterprise cubicle model complete– Channel model document updated and approved 44/0/1

• ITU-R 60GHz liaison discussion, 10/647


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Complete Proposals

• CP 1– Presentation: Carlos Cordeiro, Intel, Gal Basson, Wilocity,

10/0432r2

– Draft text: 10/0433r2

– PAR, FRD and EVM declaration: 10/0434r0

– Simulation Results and Methodology: 10/0435r0

– PHY Simulations and Methodology: 10/0431r3

• CP 2– Presentation (including simulations, PAR, FRD and EVM

declaration): Hiroshi Harada, NICT, 10/0498r3

– Draft text: 10/0499r2


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


New Technique Proposals (1/2)

• Sync & Power Saving, Huai-Rong Shao, Samsung Electronics, 10/0446r1• TGad Common Preamble, Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, 10/0439r1• New MAC Features for TGad, Chao-Chun Wang, MediaTek, 10/0441r3• Beam training procedure for 60GHz mm-wave communication (TGad),

Junyi Wang, NICT, 10/0496r2• Relay Operation in IEEE 802.11ad, Kapseok Chang, ETRI, 10/0494r1• Fast Session Transfer, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom

R&D, 10/0491r2• Beamforming Introduction, Christopher Hansen, Broadcom, 10/0430r1• Fast Session Transfer, Naveen Kakani, Nokia, 10/0436r2• 60-GHz RF System Performance Optimization, Tian-Wei Huang,

National Taiwan University, 10/0497r0• TGad Security Enhancements, Yong Liu, Marvell, 10/0438r2• Beamforming training for IEEE 802.11ad, Changsoon Choi, IHP

microelectronics, 10/0493r1


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


New Technique Proposals (2/2)

• Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming, Thomas Derham, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0487r1

• MAC Link Maintenance, Haeyoung Jun, Samsung Electronics, 10/0445r1

• Beamforming, Kishore Ramachandran, NEC, 10/0450r3• Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz, Ichihiko Toyoda, NTT,

10/0492r2• Single Carrier PHY, Murat Mese, Broadcom, 10/0429r1• Spatial Frequency Sharing and BSS Management, James Yee,

MediaTek, 10/0443r3• OFDM PHY, Vish Ponnampalam, MediaTek, 10/0440r2• Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence, Chin-Sean Sum, NICT,

10/0485r1• Spectrum Measurement for TGad, Xiaoming Peng, Institute for

Infocomm Research, 10/0507r1


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Channel Model Presentations

• Intra cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz (Part3), Shu Kato, 10/0645r0

• TGad Channel Model Update, Alexander Maltsev, 10/664r0

• Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, Alexander Maltsev, 09/0334r8

• PHY Performance Evaluation with 60 GHz WLAN Channel Models, Alexander Maltsev, 10/489r1


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Goals for July 2010

• Comment resolution on D0.1• ITU-R 60 GHz liaison


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Conference call times

• Not overlap with TGac

• July 1, 22, Aug 5– 10:00-12:00 EDT

• July 8, 29– 20:00-22:00 EDT


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report Slide 55

Guidelines for Internal TGad Comment Submission and Resolution

Date: 2010-05-19

Name Company Address Phone email Carlos Cordeiro Intel Corporation [email protected]

Eldad Perahia Intel Corporation [email protected]

from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0648r1

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Context and Introduction

• A motion formalizing internal TGad comment resolution (“the Motion”) on TGad draft specification D0.1 passed as recorded in 802.11-10/557r4

• This document provides guidelines for the internal TGad comment submission and resolution process

Slide 56


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Comment Submission

• As described in the Motion, TGad draft specification D0.1 will be posted by Friday, June 04, 2010, 11:59PM EST– Two (2) weeks after the end of the May session

• Simultaneous to the publishing of D0.1, a comment submission period will begin– Announcement will be sent to TGad reflector

– Modified 802.11 letter ballot spreadsheet will be used to submit comments on D0.1 (see next slide)

– Comment submission will be open to 802.11 voters, potential voters, and aspirants in order to solicit comments from all who may be voting in letter ballot D1.0 scheduled for September/10

• Commenting period will last for 3 weeks closing on Friday, June 25, 2010, 11:59PM EST

Slide 57


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Sample Comment Spreadsheet

• Question deleted– E.g., “Working Group Letter Ballot on "Should P802.11yy DX.0 be forwarded to Sponsor

Ballot?” does not apply

• Vote row deleted• “Part of No Vote” column deleted

Internal TGad Comment Submission on D0.1

Voter First name: <First Name>Voter Last Name: <Last Name>

23:59 hrs Eastern Time Voter Affiliation <Affiliation>DO NOT reformat or resize this form

Clause Page No.

Line No.

Comment Type (E or T) Comment / Explanation Recommended Change

Ballot Opens: Fri June 4, 2010Ballot Closes: Fri June 25, 2010

Slide 58


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Comment Resolution

• Approach to comment resolution will be to group related comments and solicit contributions to resolve groups of comments (similar to 11n)

• Submissions will be reviewed in conference calls and during TGad sessions

Slide 59


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGae Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Michael Montemurro Research in Motion 4701 Tahoe Blvd.

Mississauga, ON. Canada. L4W 0B4


Authors:

from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0573r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document is the closing report for the TGae Task Group for the May 2010 session.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Work Completed• Output:

– Discussion in implicit priority signaling for management frames– Voted to produce initial TGae draft 0.01.

• Teleconferences:– Thursday 11am ET for 90 minutes on June 3 and July 8


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGae Timeline – May 2010

• Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: November ‘10

• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: March ‘11

• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: May ‘11

• Initial Sponsor Ballot: July ‘11

• Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov ‘11

• Final WG/EC Approval: Mar ‘12

• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June ‘12


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


July 2010 Goals• Find an Editor and Secretary for TGae• Technical presentations and proposals• Review P802.11ae draft and target a WG internal review at the

end of the meeting.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


IEEE 802.11 TGafBeijing Closing Report

Date: 2010-05-21

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In

Motion 7305 Napier Trail Austin, TX 78729


Peter Ecclesine Cisco Systems 170 W. Tasman Dr., San Jose, CA 95134


Authors:

from slide 1/7 of 11-10/0577r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the third face-

to-face meeting of IEEE 802.11 TGaf taking place the week of May 17, 2010 at the IEEE 802 Wireless Interim in Beijing, PRC.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Agenda

• Joint session with 802.19 and 802.22 (Tuesday PM3)

• TVWS regulatory update

• Overview of the Technical Review and comment spreadsheet

• Categorize the comments

• Hear proposals directly related to received comments

• Plan for July and teleconferences

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 67from slide 3/7 of 11-10/0577r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

TGaf Accomplishments • Held joint session with 802.19 and 802.22 and discussed

project status of each

• Held an ad hoc session Wednesday AM1 to discuss the comments received from the Technical Review

• Approved minutes from Orlando and teleconferences

• Approved Draft d0.02 [d0.01 with changes accepted in March]

• Approved 11-10/595r5 as the comment spreadsheet

• Categorized the comments and planned for resolving them

• Updated the TGaf timeline and discussed changes required because REVmb will finish ahead of TGaf

• Planned for July and teleconferences– June 8, June 22 and July 6


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


TGaf Timeline – Updated May 2010

• Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: September 2010

• Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 2010

• Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: January 2011

• Initial Sponsor Ballot: March 2011

• Approved Sponsor Ballot: May 2011

• Final WG/EC Approval: November 2011

• RevCom/Standards Board Approval: December 2011


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Teleconferences

• June 8 and 22

• July 6 and 20

• August 3, 17 and 31

• Time: 22:00 ET for 90 minutes


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

References• 11-09-0934-09-tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c

• 11-10-0428-00-00af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010

• 11-10-0452-00-00af-march-30-teleconference-minutes

• 11-10-0475-00-00af-april-13-teleconference-minutes

• 11-10-0516-01-00af-april-27th-teleconference-minutes

• 11-10-0575-01-00af-May-11th-teleconference-minutes

• 11-10-0576-01-00af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-beijing-2010

• 11-10-0595-05-00af-d0-02-comment-spreadsheet

Slide 71 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 7/7 of 11-10/0577r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


IEEE 802.11Fast Initial Authentication Study Group


Authors:


Hiroshi MANO ROOT Inc. 8F TOC2 Bldg. 7-21-11 Nishi-Gotanda, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0031 JAPAN


Marc Emmelmann TU Berlin Einsteinufer 25 +49 30 314 24580 [email protected]

from slide 1/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Atlanta

meeting of the IEEE 802.11 TVWS SG.

from slide 2/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Agenda• AM1 Tuesday– Call for secretary– Review objectives and agenda for this session– Review IEEE/802 & 802.11 Policies and Rules– Introduction of FIA– Election of the Chair– Review draft of PAR & 5C

• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Recession

• PM1 Wednesday (Joint Meeting with TGu)– Introduction of FIA– Review draft of PAR & 5C

• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Recession

• AM1 Thursday– Approve of FIA study group agenda– Review draft of PAR & 5C

• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Time line of FIA – Schedule for Weekly Teleconference – Adjourn

• PM2 Thursday Ad hoc – Technical Presentation

• Hitoshi Morioka / 11-10/0650r3 An Example Idea of FIA– Hiroki Nakano / 11-10/0653r1 more Example Ideas around– FIAReview draft of PAR & 5C

• Marc Emmelmann / 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc – Straw poll

• PAR & 5C – Do you believe the PAR&5C contained in 11-10-0583-r5 meet IEEE-SA guidelines, and are you in favor bring in the following text as

individual motion to the IEEE802.11WG during Friday closing plenary?

Slide 74 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Accomplishments• Hiroshi Mano was elected as chair of FIA-SG• Marc Emellman was elected as secretary of FIA-SG• Reviewed and Edited the 802.11 FIA PAR and 5C

– Finish and upload as 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc • Time line • Selected weekly teleconference as,

– Starting dates: Wednesday 2nd June 2010, Start Time 11:00 am and alternative 11:00 pm EST, Duration 1Hour

– Using WEB-EX that will be provided by Study Group Chair• Straw poll at Ad hoc on PM2 Thursday

– Do you believe the PAR&5C contained in 11-10-0583-r5 meet IEEE-SA guidelines, and are you in favor bring in the following text as individual motion to the IEEE802.11WG during Friday closing plenary? Motion:

– Request that the PAR contained in 11-10-0583-r5 and the Five Criteria contained in 11-10-0583-r5 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.

– Yes: 7, No:0, Abstain: 0

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 75from slide 4/6 of 11-10/0667r0 by Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Documents

• draft PAR & 5C– 11-10-0583-03-0fia-fia-par-and-5c.doc

• Technical Presentation– 11-10/0650r3 An Example Idea of FIA

– 11-10/0653r1 more Example Ideas around FIA


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Thanks to all who participated!


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


S1G Closing Report – May 2010Date: 2010-05-20

Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dave Halasz Aclara 30400 Solon Rd

Solon, OH 44139

440-528-7477 [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

This document is the closing report for the S1G Study Group for the May 2010 session.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Work Completed• Output:

– 10/0001r8 Approved in S1G 9-0-1– Motion to occur in full WG


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


July 2010 Goals• IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) approval to submit to

NesCom


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Motion

• Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, request that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in 10/0001r8 be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom.

• Moved by Dave Halasz on behalf of S1G SG

• Moved: Dorothy Stanley , Seconded: Garth Hillman Result: 9-0-1

Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 82from slide 5/5 of 11-10/0669r0 by Dave Halasz, Aclara

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


IEEE 802.11Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee


Name Affiliations Address Phone email Rich Kennedy Research In

Motion 7305 Napier Trail Austin, TX 78729


Authors:


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


AbstractThis presentation is the closing report for the Beijing

meeting of the IEEE 802.11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee.


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Agenda

• Administrative items– Required notices

– Review and approve teleconference minutes

• Introduction

• The regulatory summaries– North America

– European Union

– Asia

• FOCUS: – FCC Net Neutrality

Slide 85 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporationfrom slide 3/6 of 11-10/0674r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Regulatory AHC Activities

• Presented regulatory summaries from North America, the EU and Asia

• Reviewed the latest information regarding EN 300 328 revision– ERM TG11 status

– ERM TG28 Wireless Factory efforts to circumvent sharing rule

• Discussed the court ruling in Comcast v. FCC– FCC has only ancillary authority over “broadband”

• Discussed the FCC Chairman’s plan in light of service providers’ threat to reduce investment and slow broadband rollout– Limited Title II regulatory control over only the “transmission service”


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

References

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297944A1.pdf

• http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-297945A1.pdf


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0

Report

Thanks to all who participated!

See you in San Diego


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Smart Grid ad hoc Closing Report - May 2010

Date: 2010-5-05Abstract: Smart Grid ad hoc meeting report

•Source Document 11-10-0505r1

Name Company Address Phone emailBruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane,

Santa Clara, CA, 95054


Kaberi Banerjee

from slide 1/12 of 11-10/0672r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Topic - Summary1. Status of NIST PAP#2 Report status for NIST PAP#2

• Evolution of Use Cases submitted by OpenSG Refinement of terms Refinement of input data for modeling calculations

E.g. frame size when including CCMP and end-to-end security overhead

Model Output graph script standardization and interpretations


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Report Outline• Table of Contents• Revision History ............................................................................................................................................. iii• Preface ...................................................................................................................................................... - 1 -• Authors ...................................................................................................................................................... - 2 -• 1 Overview of the process .................................................................................................................... - 3 -• 2 Acronyms and Definitions.................................................................................................................. - 4 -• 2.1 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ - 4 -• 2.2 Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... - 7 -• 3 Smart grid....................................................................................................................................... - 11 -• 3.1 Reference Architecture................................................................................................................... - 11 -• 3.2 List of actors.................................................................................................................................. - 13 -• 3.3 Use Cases..................................................................................................................................... - 14 -• 3.4 Application requirements................................................................................................................ - 16 -• 3.4.1 Smart grid user applications’ quantitative requirements......................................................... - 16 -• 3.4.2 Aggregation of requirements per actor to actor...................................................................... - 16 -• 4 Wireless Technology ....................................................................................................................... - 20 -• 5 Evaluation approach / Modeling approach ...................................................................................... - 21 -• 5.1 Channel Models ............................................................................................................................. - 23 -• 5.1.1 Indoor-indoor environments ................................................................................................... - 24 -• 5.1.2 Outdoor-outdoor environments .............................................................................................. - 25 -• 5.1.3 Outdoor-indoor environments ................................................................................................ - 25 -• 5.2 Physical Layer............................................................................................................................... - 26 -• 5.3 MAC sublayer................................................................................................................................ - 26 -• 5.4 Example Modeling Tool.................................................................................................................. - 26 -• 5.5 Other Tools ................................................................................................................................... - 27 -• 6 Findings / Results........................................................................................................................... - 28 -• 7 Conclusions.................................................................................................................................... - 31 -• 8 References ..................................................................................................................................... - 32 -• 9 Bibliography.................................................................................................................................... - 32 -


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Application Information

• Q: we further clarify the Smart Grid applications?

• A: Huge amount of information developed by Open SG

• Example:

• http://osgug.ucaiug.org/UtiliComm/Shared%20Documents/SG-NET%20PAP%20work-in-progress/Diagrams-wip/SG-NET-diagram-r0.5e.pdf


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


http://osgug.ucaiug.org/UtiliComm/Shared%20Documents/Interium_Release_3/Diagrams/SG-NET-diagram-r0.5e.pdf


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Smart Grid Use Case Requirements Derived

Requirements included in release 3.0

Meter Read Yes Yes Direct load control In progress No Service Switch Yes Yes PHEV Yes Yes System updates In progress No Distributed GEN In progress No Distributed Storage Draft No Outage Events Yes Yes Tamper Events Draft No Meter Events Draft No Demand Response Draft No Pre-Pay Metering Yes Yes Field Force tools Not started No Distribution auto support Yes Yes Transmission auto support Not started No Pricing TOU / RTP/ CPP in progress No Configuration mgmt in progress No Accounting Mgmt in progress No Performance Mgmt in progress No Security mgmt in progress No Fault mgmt in progress No Volt/VAR Management Yes Yes

Listing of pertinent use casesIn order to create a list of functional requirements for the Smart Grid, an exercise was performed to list all pertinent use cases that involve network communication. Sources for this information include the Southern California Edison Use Cases, Grid Wise Architectural Console use cases, EPRI and others. Use cases from all of these sources were selected based upon a network requirements basis. From this research the following high level use cases have been identified

http://osgug.ucaiug.org/UtiliComm/Shared%20Documents/Interium_Release_3/SG%20Network%20System%20Requirements%20Specification%20v3.doc


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


900+ Uses cases documented

http://osgug.ucaiug.org/UtiliComm/Shared%20Documents/Interium_Release_3/SG%20Network%20System%20Requirements%20Specification%20v3.0.xls


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Resulting Data Message sizes (for this selection)

• On-demand meter read 100 bytes• TLS 25 bytes• Transport TCP 20 bytes• IP-SEC (Tunnel mode) 80 bytes• IPv6 40 bytes• IEEE 802.11 CCMP 16 bytes• IEEE 802.11 28 bytes• DSSS 24 bytes

– ----------------------------------------------------------------------• TOTALS 333 bytes• Similarly for Application Error on-demand meter read

– TOTALS 283 bytes• Similarly for Multiple interval meter read

– TOTALS 1833 bytes - 2833 bytes*• *Exceeds MTU of 802.11 must segment into two frames

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/March31NISTPresentation.ppt


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Relationship betweenThroughput and Payload

Payload Length

Throughput

Lower SNR

High SNR

Low SNR


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Framing

http://forskningsnett.uninett.no/wlan/throughput.html


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Topic #2 Summary

Suitability of 802.11 to Smart Grid

• As is – Generally complete

• With addition of TGs mesh and S1G – enhanced range and application diversity

• Anything Further??

• Nothing proposed


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Topic - Summary• Next Ad hoc call on Wednesday June 2

• Review Report status

• Highlights from Connectivity Week, P2030 and SGIP meetings


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


JTC1 ad hoc closing report (May 10)Date: 2010-05-20


Andrew Myles Cisco [email protected]

Authors:

from slide 1/3 of 11-10/0673r0 by Andrew Myles, Cisco

May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


Abstract

Closing report for JTC1 ad hocfor May 2010, Beijing, China


May 2010

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0542r0


JTC1 ad hoc reviewed items related to SB drafts, PSDO, WAPI & tutorial

• Progress in Beijing (May 2010)– Reviewed status of SB drafts sent to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6

• Latest 11v/p/z were NOT sent to SC6

– Discussed possible liaison to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 regarding process comments from the China NB• Chair took action to draft letter that will be reviewed later today

– Review WAPI status in ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6• No change since WAPI NP was approved

– Discuss any other JTC1/SC6 liaison matters• Discussed options for working with SC6 on reviewing WAPI and

ensuring coexistence with 802.11

• Plans for San Diego (July 2010)– Identify IEEE rep for JTC1/SC6 meeting in London in Sept


May 2010

Date post:	20-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	emory-hicks
View:	212 times
Download:	0 times