+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued...

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued...

Date post: 27-Mar-2015
Category:
Upload: jada-cruz
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
15
DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials and device structures
Transcript
Page 1: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

ITRS FEP Challenges

Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials and device

structures

Page 2: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

PIDS Logic FEOL ITRS Drivers-1• Transistor scaling to maintain historical MOSFET speed gains

– Historical speed metric is the MOSFET gate delay, :

= CV I

• MOSFET delay has historically been decreasing at a compounded annual rate of 17% per year.

• The ITRS device drivers are based on the continuation of this historical rate.• A major ITRS logic challenge is that traditional scaling of bulk MOSFET devices

will not permit the continuation of this trend. New device materials and structures will be required.

Capacitance

Power Supply Voltage

MOSFET Drive Current

Page 3: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

• Limit the increase in dynamic power consumption, P

• Power management requires that power supply voltage be continuously reduced. • Low voltage operation then drives the need to lower the MOSFET threshold voltage

which inevitably results in increased off-state leakage.• New device structures and materials and their CMOS integration will be

required to manage off-state leakage, while continuously reducing gate delay

PIDS Logic FEOL ITRS Drivers-2

P = ½ C f V2

Gate + Source/Drain Capacitance of the logic gate

Switching Frequency

Power supply voltage

Page 4: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Device Scenario Implicit in the 2003 ITRS

• 2003-2007- Bulk devices with enhancements to reduce gate delay

– Multiple MOSFET designs on the same chip to optimize performance and power consumption (more complex process flows)

– Introduce High-k gate dielectric- enhances low voltage drive current, while reducing off-state leakage

– Introduce Strained silicon channels- enhances mobility, therefore low voltage drive current

– Introduce Metal gates

- enhances drive current by reducing polysilicon gate depletion layer

- requires two different gate materials for dual work functions

• 2008-2011 Fully depleted SOI single gate devices with elevated source/drains

• 2012-2018 Double- or Multiple-gate fully depleted devices e.g. FinFET

Page 5: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Bulk Scaling Trends/Challenges Years 2003-2007

½ X every 4-6 years

2 metals replace dual doped poly

High-k replaces Silicon Oxynitride

NiSi replaces CoSi2

Strained Channel Layer

Lowered Drain extension Rs

Lowered Metal/Silicon Contact R

Gate Length Scaling and 10% 3 CD Control !!!!!

Page 6: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Challenges:

•Dual metal gate integration

•CD Control (10% 3)

•Spacer integrity

•Silicide/Si contact Rc

•Active Layer t control

•Hi-k integration

•Zero Damage Cleaning

•BOX layer thickness control

•Drain extension Rs and gate drain overlap

•Epi-Bulk interface contamination

FD SOI Scaling Challenges 2008-2011

Box Layer

Dual metal gates (nMOS, pMOS)

Contact NiSi

Epi Elevated Contact

Strained Silicon Active Layer

High-k Dielectric

Sidewall spacer

Active layer thickness ~0.4 Lgate, must scale with gate length

Page 7: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Multiple Gate Device Scaling 2011-2018

Buried Oxide Layer

Source Drain

Silicon Fin ChannelMetal Gates 1 & 2

1

2

= High N doping

= Light P doping

Page 8: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Gate 1

Gate 2

Source Drain

Sidewall SpacersHi-k Gate Dielectric Layers

Drain ExtensionsChallenges:

•Gate CD Control

•Metal Gate Integration

•Fin Thickness control

•Drain Extension parasitic resistance

•Silicon/Silicide contact Resistance

•Sidewall spacer integrity

•High-k gate dielectric integration

•Zero damage cleaning

Fin Thickness ~0.8 Lgate, must scale with gate length scaling

Multi-Gate FET Scaling Challenges

Page 9: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Starting Materials Challenges

• Introduction and evolution of new substrate materials– Strained Silicon– Silicon on Insulator for Fully Depleted devices

• Continuous defect recognition and reduction• Introduction of Next Generation (~450mm) wafer size

– ITRS sets requirement for year 2011 introduction– Industry R&D is not in place to meet this timing– Traditional manufacturing methods may not be economically scaleable

Page 10: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

DRAM Capacitor Scaling Challenges

• A minimum (25-35 fF) storage capacitance is required to maintain bit integrity• Storage capacitor size must continuously decrease

– DRAM bit capacity increases 2x every 2 years– DRAM chip size remains constant

• Traditional capacitor materials can no longer satisfy scaling requirements• Polysilicon will be replaced by metal for capacitor plates• Silicon oxynitride will be replaced by new dielectric materials having higher dielectric constant

Page 11: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

100nm 70nm 45 nm 25 nm

MIS MIM MIM MIM

Metal

Oxynitride

Poly Si

Metal

Ta2O5, Al2O3

New Hi-KSrRuO3 ?

epi-BST ?

Technology Migration of Stack Capacitor

Page 12: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

DRAM Trench Capacitor Scaling

Silicon

High-k Dielectric

Metal

Trench = 122nm diameter by

7000nm deep

45nm node 57:1 Trench

Silicon

Silicon Oxynitride

Polysilicon

Trench = 217nm diameter by

6000nm deep

90nm node 28:1 Trench

Page 13: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Flash Memory Scaling Challenges• Inter-Poly dielectric thickness must be reduced to maintain coupling

ratio in order to compensate for reduction in floating gate area

• Tunnel dielectric must be scaled in a way to ensure charge retention

• New, high k dielectric materials are needed for continued scaling of the inter-poly dielectric •New dielectric structures are needed for thickness reduction of tunnel dielectric

10

100

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

die

siz

e (

mm

2)

32M 64M

16M

128M

Page 14: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Major 2005 Initiatives• Address Wafer Size Progression

- Fundamental Technical and Economic Issues Associated with Large Diameter Wafers (Crystal Growth and Manufacturing Equipment) Need to be Better Identified and Quantified- Development of Solutions is Already Behind Schedule

• Work with Design / Litho / PIDS to Resolve Gate CD Control Tolerances

• Consider Overlapping Alternate Scenarios (Bulk, FD SOI, FINFET) - FEP Recommendation is to Extend Bulk Devices (using parallel lines)

- In cases where likely scenario is not clear (FD SOI vs FINFET), consider parallel lines (industry survey to be considered)

• Work with PIDS on Key Device Parameters-Validate Models for Poly-Depletion - Develop Model-Based Doping Requirements for Non-Bulk Devices-Re-Evaluate Gate Leakage Requirements

• Address Wafer Edge Exclusion- New Processes, e.g. FD SOI, Immersion Lithography Make it Exceedingly Difficult to Maintain Status Quo, Yet Need is to Reduce Exclusion- FEP and YE to Provide Inputs to Factory Integration to Help Ensure that We Don’t Immediately Hit Red Wall

Page 15: DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference ITRS FEP Challenges Continued scaling will require the introduction of new materials.

DRAFT - NOT FOR PUBLICATION 14 July 2004 – ITRS Summer Conference

Major 2005 Initiatives- Memory• Review Flash Memory

– Timing of nodes– Clarify definition of NOR minimum feature size– Evaluate a factor and chip size– Evaluate dielectric scaling requirements– Add potential solutions– Generate requirements for embedded flash

• Review and Revise DRAM Sections- Generate requirements for embedded DRAM- Reevaluate a factor and chip size- Reevaluate storage capacitor requirements and materials

• Include Alternative Memory Devices- SONOS, PCM, Floating Body


Recommended