DRAFT ONLY. MARRI.US/POWERPOINTS DRAFT ONLY How Society Works In the Context of The War Against Its...

DRAFT ONLYDRAFT ONLY


MARRI.US/POWERPOINTS


How Society WorksHow Society Works

In the Context of In the Context of

The War The War Against Its FoundationsAgainst Its Foundations

(The Long Slow March Through the Institutions(The Long Slow March Through the Institutions))


The 5 Basic InstitutionsThe 5 Basic Institutions5 Basic Tasks5 Basic Tasks

ChurchChurchFamilyFamily

SchoolSchool

GovernmentGovernment MarketMarket


The Five Basic InstitutionsThe Five Basic InstitutionsFive Basic TasksFive Basic Tasks

ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool


Instrumental

Relational & Person-Forming


Fundamental CapacitiesFundamental Capacities

ReflectionReflectionSexualitySexuality

IntelligenceIntelligence

ForceForce WorkWork


Buildings ReflectBuildings ReflectSociety’s Fundamental TasksSociety’s Fundamental Tasks

ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



Fundamental TasksFundamental TasksOf the IndividualOf the Individual

ChurchChurchFamilyFamily

SchoolSchool

GovGov MarketMarket


Belonging: Male + Female Belonging: Male + Female

FamilyFamily

Child / AdultChild / Adult

Father Father MotherMother

Society At LargeSociety At Large


Society’s Foundational RelationshipSociety’s Foundational Relationship


THE 5 BASIC INSTITUTIONS

Providing The

Instruments

Forming

The Perso

n

GOV.

MARKETPLACE

FAMILY

CHURCHSCHOOL

Order Goods and

Services

The Person

Orientation In Life

Learning



REJECTION RATIO FOR THE U.S.- 2012REJECTION RATIO FOR THE U.S.- 2012

The Moynihan Report (1965): The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (//

Asian Family now) vs.89.8 % Intact Family (1941) Pearl

Harbor




Weight Lifting Capacity


Tax ($) Paying Capacity


The Seasons for Growing


3 ROBUST

2 ANEMIC


The Seasons for Growing




Annual Rejection Ratio: For Every 100 Children Born Sources: CDC/ NCHS report series

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

1950

1955

1960

1965

1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

1998

2000

Divorce

OWB


CRISIS OF MALE AND FEMALE



ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



Educational Attainment / Life Earnings (in millions)


2.9

2.62.6

2.5

2.6

2.5

2.30

2.40

2.50

2.60

2.70

2.80

2.90

Ave

rag

e G

PA

Enl

igsh

/Mat

h C

ombi

ned

INTACT STEP COHABIT (BOTHNATURAL)

COHABIT (ONENATURAL)

DIVORCED NEVER MARRIED

GPA English/Math by Family StructureSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


School Expulsion Source Add Health Wave II 1996




3.93 Million Children 3.17 Million Children

0.75 Million Children

Unmarried Parents Same Parents Married

Source R Rector: Analysis of CPS 2001

Children in Poverty

In Poverty

Out of Poverty


$100

$27

$127

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Co

mp

ara

tiv

e I

nco

me

%

Average Unmarried Male Premium Average Married Male

Marriage Premium in Male Income Source Antovics, K. & Town, R. Am Econ Review V 94, (2004) pp 317-321

+ =


Impact of Divorce on Income of Families

10,000

Before Divorce After Divorce

20,000

30,000

40,000

$50,000

1993 Average Annual Income

Source: Corcoran and Chaudray, Unpublished Research Paper, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, May 1994

Family Status



ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



Source: C. Harper and S. McLanahan, “Father Absence and Youth Incarceration,” ASA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, August 1998. Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.

Family Structure: Comparative Rates Family Structure: Comparative Rates Of Youth IncarcerationOf Youth Incarceration

1

2.07

2.71

3.7

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

Raised in Intact Married ParentFamily

Raised in Mother-Only Family Raised in a Mother andStepfather Family

Raised in a Stepmother Family

Co

mp

arat

ive

Rat

es o

f In

carc

erat

ion


Adolescent Cocaine Use By Family Structure Source Add Health Wave II 1996

DRAFT ONLYDRAFT ONLYU.S: Partner / Spouse Violence Against Mothers Over 20 With Children under 12

Source DOJ Nat Crime Victimization Survey 1999

46

15

33

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Married Widowed Married+Div+SepCombined

Never Married

Ra

te P

er

1,0

00


Relative Rates of Physical Abuse by Family Structure Source NIS-4, 2010

1.0

5.2

4.3

10.3

3.13.6

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Always IntactMarried Family

Step MarriedFamily

Intact CohabitingFamily

Step CohabitingFamily

Single ParentFamily

Not living witheither parent


Relative Rates of Sexual Abuse by Family Structure Source NIS-4, 2010

1

5

19.8

4.8

10.68.6

0

5

10

15

20

25

Always IntactMarried Family

Step MarriedFamily

Intact CohabitingFamily

Step CohabitingFamily

Single ParentFamily

Not living witheither parent



ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



6.4%

7.3%

10.3%

11.5%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

Per

cen

t W

ho

Had

Eve

r R

un

Aw

ay

WEEKLY+ MONTHLY+ <MONTHLY NEVER

Running Away by Church AttendanceRunning Away by Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


19.1%

31.9%

39.3%

35.2%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%


Times Drunk / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


7. 72%

11. 22%

16. 22%

17. 99%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

Perc

ent W

ho H

ave

Used H

ard

Dru

gs


Hard Drugs / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


0.61

0.92

1.41

1.55

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60

Num

ber o

f Sex

Par

tner

s


Girls: Number of Sex Partners / Church AttendanceSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.



ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



Source NSFG 1995

In 1st. Marriage x Sexual Partners


In 1st. Marriage x Sexual Partners200-2010


The More Sexual Partners the More Likely to Abort Source NSFG 1995

8

12

1819

25

3134

3943

52

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21+NUMBER OF NON MARITAL SEXUAL PARTNERS IN LIFETIME

Pe

rce

nt

wh

o h

av

e a

bo

rtio

ns

la

ter


Non-Marital Sexual Partners and Out-of-Wedlock BirthsSource: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth, 1995

1.71%

16.29%

32.89%

40.02%

44.02% 42.66%

49.45% 49.99%47.55%

55.21%

49.89%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Virgin atTime of

FirstMarriage

Had Pre-Marital Sexwith FirstHusband

1 2 3 4 5 6-10. 11-15. 16-20 21+

Number of Lifetime Voluntary Non-Marital Sexual Partners

Pe

rce

nt

of

Se

xu

all

y A

cti

ve

Wo

me

n A

ge

d 1

5-4

4 w

ith

Ch

ild

ren


Non-Marital Sexual Partners And Single MotherhoodSource: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics, National Survey of Family Growth, 1995

7.09%

30.21%

36.48%38.81%

44.16%

53.07%

48.13% 47.03%

50.30%

56.98%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6-10. 11-15. 16-20 21+

Number of Lifetime Non-Marital Sexual Partners

Pe

rce

nt

of

Se

xu

all

y A

cti

ve

wo

me

n A

ge

d 1

5-4

4 w

ith

Ch

ild

ren


78%

75%

59% 58% 55% 55%50%

42%

29%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

% V

irgin

sVirginity By Family Structure

Source Add Health, 1996


41.2%

25.8%

14.6%

6.3%

3.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

Intact Step Cohabit Divorced Single

% R

atin

g Da

d W

arm

and

Lov

ing

Father Rated Warm and Loving Source: National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health Wave 2, 1996


Female Homosexuality



ChurchChurch

FamilyFamily

SchoolSchool



<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+

INTACT/COHABIT(NATURAL)

ANY REJ ECTION

2.48

2.722.75

2.94

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.8

2.9

3

Ave

rag

e G

PA

(E

ng

lish

& M

ath

Co

mb

ine

d)

GPA


<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJ ECTION

46.7%

32.5%

25.5%

17.3%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

Expulsion & SuspensionSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


Number of Sex Partners for GirlsNumber of Sex Partners for Girls

<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

1.55

0.93

1.14

0.47

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

1.40

1.60


<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

13.1%

8.5%

8.1%

5.2%

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Pe

rce

nt

Wh

o H

ad

Ev

er

Ru

n A

wa

y

Running AwayBy Family Structure and Religious Practice

Source: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


<MONTHLY/NEVER

WEEKLY/MONTHLY+


ANY REJECTION

41.2%

24.5%

33.4%

22.4%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Self Control: Times DrunkSelf Control: Times Drunk


<MONTHLY/ NEVER

WEEKLY/ MONTHLY+

INT ACT / COHABIT (NAT URAL)

ANY RE J E CT ION

20.1%

9.5%

14.6%

8.5%

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Per

cent

Who

Hav

e U

sed

Har

d D

rugs

Self Control: Hard Drug UseSource: Adolescent Health Survey, Wave I. Adolescents grade 7-12.


Society’s Foundational RelationshipSociety’s Foundational Relationship


The Non-ThrivingThe Non-ThrivingMarriage / Child RelationshipMarriage / Child Relationship



Going on Offense

Rebuilding America


Strong Opposition

Wobbly

Shore UpFirst

Win OverNext

Leave for Later

General Approach



Church

Church

Family

Family

School

School

Traditi

onal

Now



RADICAL ASSAULT •NEVER BEFORE IN HUMAN HISTORY

•TOTAL REMAKE OF THE FAMILY

•ELIMINATION OF RELIGION

•NO OBJECTIVE REALITY ……..Make Reality whatever you wan it to be

BUT THERE IS AN OBJECTIVE REALITY ….AND THE DATA SHOW IT


The Two Models of Society

The Christian Model The Planned Parenthood Model


4) SCHOOL BEVAVIOR DETERIORATES

Top 5 Student Behavior Problems Reported by Teachers 1940-1962

1. Talking2. Chewing gum3. Making Noise4. Running in the Halls5. Getting Out of Turn in

Line

Top 5 Student Behavior Problems Reported by Teachers 1963-present

1. Rape2. Robbery3. Assault4. Burglary5. Arson



Towards What ?


HOW DO WE MOVE FORWARD ?



The Young Intact Married Family

That Worships God Weekly


GRAND STRATEGY GROW

YOUNG INTACT MARRIED FAMILIES THAT

WORSHIP GOD WEEKLY



RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION


The Young Intact Married Family

That Worships God Weekly


EVERYTHING

ELSEFALLS

IN PLACE


EVERYTHING


The Foundational Relationship of Society

MARRIAGE

Man and Woman = ChildHusband and Wife = Family

Husband + Wife + children + God


Subscribe

[email protected]

• MORE STUDIES– Effects of Abortion on Breast Cancer– Religion and Crime, Income, Health– Sexuality, Monogamy, Religion, Marriage


MARRI.US/POWERPOINTS


Date post:	19-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	milo-watkins
View:	213 times
Download:	0 times

DRAFT ONLY. MARRI.US/POWERPOINTS DRAFT ONLY How Society Works In the Context of The War Against Its...

Documents