Date post: | 11-Jul-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | nguyennguyet |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
DRINKING WATER SAFETY PLANS
Reviewing our DWSP’s and Incorporating DWSP’s into ‘Business as Usual’
Catherine Fearon
Water Quality Manager
South East Water
9th March 2010
Introduction
� The Risk based approach at SEW
– Development of DWSP’s before the Merger
– DWSP’s and the PR09 Process
– SEW DWSP Communication Strategy
� DWSP Review Process
– SEW’s Review Process for Drinking Water
– Safety Plans
� Future Strategies for the Development and Implementation for a Business as Usual Approach to DWSP’s
– Development of the Database
– Improvements to the Intranet site
– Use within the business
Timeline and Milestones
Draft Non PR09 Notices submittedNov 2009
Review – Event Trigger / In line with Audits / Risk basedOngoing
Resubmission following DWI Feedback for additional informationMar 2009
Draft PR09 Undertakings submitted – Signed in January 2010Oct 2009
Embed DWSP database / RA tool into ‘business as usual’Apr 2011
DWI issued guidance on WSP’s. First indications of a merger but ban on communication between companies because of the competition commission.
Oct 2006
Amendments to the Water Supply Regulations 2000: Risk assessments required for all water companies. All PR09 schemes require a valid DWSP and risk assessment. MKW and SEW merge.
Dec 2007
DWI Guidance on submission of Reg 28 forms.Aug 2008
All risk assessments are submitted by this date. SEW (after the merger) submitted 96 Reg 28 forms using the DWI template.
Oct 2008
Former MKW and SEW begun working on WSP’s independently.2005 -
Workshop based DWSP’s
� Likelihood
– Rare (1), Unlikely (2), Possible (3), Likely (4) to Certain (5)
� Consequence
– Insignificant (1), Minor (2), Moderate (3), Major (4) to Catastrophic (5)
� Risk = Likelihood x Consequence
0 = No risk No action required
1-5 = Low risk Control Measure in place within 12 months
6-10 = Medium Risk Control Measure in place within 6 months
11-15 = High Risk Control Measure in place within 1 month
16-25 = V High Risk Control Measure in place immediately
Mid Kent Water Risk Matrix
Data based DWSP’s
Very High Risk Very High Risk Very High RiskHigh RiskModerate Risk5
Very High Risk Very High RiskHigh RiskHigh RiskModerate Risk4
Very High Risk Very High RiskHigh RiskModerate RiskLow Risk3
Very High RiskHigh RiskModerate RiskLow RiskLow Risk2
High RiskModerate RiskModerate RiskLow RiskLow Risk1
EDCBA
CatastrophicEOne off dose
MajorD
ModerateC
MinorB Varies on
Consequence
to health
Cumulative dose
InsignificantA
Severity
Always over PCV(Once a day to once a week)Certain5
Over PCV in most samples(Once a week to once a month)Likely4
Over PCV in half samplesOnce a month to once a year)Possible3
Over PCV occasionally(Once a year to once every 10 years)Unlikely2
Never present in water(Over once every 10 yearsRare1
Likelihood
Former South East Water Risk Matrix
PR09 AMP 5 Programme
An UNACCEPTABLE RISK is one that after control measure (if this exists) risk is still designated as a high risk or very high risk to the customer.
UNACCEPTABLE RISKS identified in DWSP’s formed PR09 application to OFWAT. Quality Scheme approval by DWI and other risks incorporated into Capital Maintenance
AMP5 Programme developed following determination.
RISK BASED APPROACH when planning timescales for programme in conjunction with WQ.
Paddock Wood No. 1
Coggins Mill BH 5
Poverty Bottom WTW
PR09 Notices and UndertakingsSEW currently have:
� 22 PR09 Undertakings and Notices– 11 Cryptosporidium– 6 Metaldehyde– 1 Pesticide– 2 Discolourations– 1 Taste and Odour– 1 Ammonia
� 53 Non-PR09 Notices – 28 Turbidity Monitors– 17 Ingress– 6 Contamination– 1 Oxadixyl– 1 Hydrocarbons
� 36 areas where already addressed Unacceptable Risks (to be updated and submitted to DWI by 31st March 2010)
� 30 Acknowledged Actions
SEW Communication Strategy
INTERNAL COMMUNICATION
During development of DWSP’s� Workshops� Site Visits� Dedicated Intranet Site
Continued Review Process� Water Quality liaison meetings
– Kent– Sussex– Western
� Water Resources liaison meetings� Operations planning liaison meetings� Water Quality team meetings� Customer Technical Centre liaison
meetings
EXTERNAL COMMUNICATION
During development of DWSP’s� EA Workshops� HPA Seminars� LA Attendance at Workshops
Continued Review Process� Bulk supply liaison meetings� EA / Water Company Forums� Annual WQ Meetings with Local
Authorities
Control Measure Reviewed
Review of DWSP’S
Identify Teamand
Responsibilities
Hazard Assessment
Risk Assessment
Control Measures
Management Documentation
Intranet
Resource
Asset
Customer Services
Leakage
Control Room
Water Quality
Production
Distribution
Environmental Team
Risk score evaluated
Relevant control measure emplaced
Evaluated and created by the teams
Established control measure reviewed and validated – is it effective at controlling risk?
Includes hygiene codes, treatment management and DOMS
Development of risk assessments and statements
Current documentation accessible to all teams
Event Triggers
Review Process (in line with audits)
Validation Monitoring
Internal communication
External communication
Data collection, review of monitoring data (samples and levels) and compliant reviews leading to development of DWSP Excel risk spreadsheets
Engineering
Unacceptable Risk created?
AMP5 Programme
The next steps - DWSP Database
Database will provide a single systematic approach to DWSP’s.
Initial Requirements: To collate sample data from LIMS
– Risk score modified automatically as failures occur
– To provide audit trail for changes to plans / risks
– To produce risk characterisation based on trigger levels
– Reg 28 forms to be automatically produced
– Prompts review process
– Linked with GIS, Asset Management System, Lab systems, SCOPE, Maximo
WQ’s exact requirements to be finalised during the workshop with Mouchel on the 18th March 2010.
Enhancement of our Intranet Site
Aim of Enhancement of Intranet Site: To provide reliable and up-to-date water quality risk information to every department
within SEW.
� Water Quality– DWSP’s (initially Reg 28 forms)– Geographical representation of assets and WQ risk information– Up to date interpreted Water Quality data
� Customer Services– Water Supply Zone Data Summaries– To provide internal information on the science behind water
quality� Operational Risk Assessments for use in compiling Method Statements for
planned work.� Relevant Process Science Information� Relevant Laboratory Information
The Benefits of a Proactive Drinking Water Safety Plan:
� To safeguard water quality from catchment to consumer
� To ensure highest standards of drinking water supplied to all customers. Resulting in positive impact on consumer confidence in SEW’s supply area
� To minimise the risks of water quality failure aiming for excellent compliance figures, few incidents and as few as possible WQ complaints
� DWSP Database designed to manage and retrieve information which will facilitate a proactive approach to Water Quality
� DWSP’s become fully incorporated as ‘business as usual’.
� Collective ownership of finalised DWSP’s is the key to protecting WQ.