+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 ·...

Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 ·...

Date post: 01-Mar-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance of a Mature Hurricane Jonathan Poterjoy and Fuqing Zhang Pennsylvania State University December 16, 2009
Transcript
Page 1: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Dynamics and Structure of Three-Dimensional Error Covariance of a

Mature Hurricane

Jonathan Poterjoy and Fuqing Zhang Pennsylvania State University

December 16, 2009

Page 2: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

The Tropical Cyclone Prediction Issue

A 1-2% per year increase in track forecasts has occurred over the last 3 decades (Franklin et al. 2003).

In general, little progress has been made in terms of intensity prediction.

WHY?

One deficiency comes from the use of isotropic, flow-independent background statistics in operational data assimilation systems, which are ill-suited for the highly flow-dependent background error covariances associated with tropical cyclones. Estimating non-static background statistics is a computationally expensive process, but may be required for the next generation of tropical cyclone prediction systems.

Page 3: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Experiment Description

This study examines the flow-dependent correlation structure of an axisymmetric vortex through a progression of simple to complex models:

•  Rankine vortex model •  Axisymmetric Rotunno-Emanuel (1987) maximum potential intensity model •  Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model

For the Rankine vortex and axisymmetric experiments, random perturbations were added to initial conditions before numerical integration to create ensembles large enough for a reasonable estimation of forecast error. Correlations were calculated from a WRF ensemble of Hurricane Katrina forecasts for comparison.

Page 4: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Model Descriptions

Rankine Vortex

•  Axisymmetric •  Solid-body rotation for •  2-dimensional x-y plane •  Variables: Vt, Vu, Vv, and Wz •  Ensemble size: 500

V t =

V 0

Rr, r ≤ R

V 0Rr, r ≥ R

⎨ ⎪

⎩ ⎪

r ≤ R

Page 5: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Model Descriptions

Rotunno-Emanuel (1987) Axisymmetric Vortex Model (RE87)

• Steady-state, axisymmetric hurricane simulation • Originally designed to study Maximum Potential Intensity (MPI) theory • Nonhydrostatic • Convection is accounted for explicitly • Initialized with a finite-amplitude vortex • Uses soundings from WRF Katrina members • Variables: Vt, Vu, Vv, Vw, dP, dT, Wz, Ql, and Qv • Domain:

•  45 x 45 x 15 •  9 km horizontal resolution •  1.2 km vertical resolution

• 2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions • 10 day lead-time • Ensemble size: 50

ˆ z

ˆ x

Page 6: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Model Descriptions Advanced Research WRF (ARW)

•  Fully compressible, nonhydrostatic, mesoscale model •  Variables: Vu, Vv, Vt, Vr, Vw, dP, dT, Wz, dT, QL, and QV •  Nested vortex following domain:

•  253 x 253 x 34 •  4.5 km horizontal resolution

•  Ensemble initialization: EnKF after assimilating hours of airborne Vr •  60 hour lead time ensemble of Hurricane Katrina forecasts •  The forecast time of 1200 UTC August 28, 2005 was used:

• Katrina was at category 5 intensity at this time, making it easy to replicate using the RE87 model.

•  Ensemble size: 92 (members which tracked over land were removed) •  Storms re-centered based on location of minimum surface pressure •  Domain reduced to 89 x 89 x 30 grid points •  Variables averaged azimuthally

Page 7: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Tangential Velocity Profiles

Tang

entia

l Vel

ocity

(m/s

)

Radius (km)

Page 8: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

RE87 Ensemble Members Mean and Standard Deviation

Page 9: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Cross Spatial Correlation: -Correlation between two

different forecast variables at different grid points.

Definitions

Cross Correlation: -Correlation between two

different forecast variables at the same grid point.

Corr(x ijk,y lmn) =Exp[(x ijk−x )(y lmn−y )]

σ xσ y

=Cov(x ijk,y lmn)

σ xσ y

x ≠ y, (i, j,k) = (l,m,n)

x ≠ y, (i, j,k) ≠ (l,m,n)

r(x11,y11) r(x12,y12) r(x13,y13)r(x 21,y 21) r(x 22,y 22) r(x 23,y 23)r(x 31,y 31) r(x 32,y 32) r(x 33,y 33)

r(x 22,y11) r(x 22,y12) r(x 22,y13)r(x 22,y 21) r(x 22,y 22) r(x 22,y 23)r(x 22,y 31) r(x 22,y 32) r(x 22,y 33)

Page 10: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Tangential Velocity Comparison

Rankine Vortex ARW Katrina

Vt Standard Deviation

Vt Mean

Vt Standard Deviation

Vt Mean

Page 11: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Tangential Velocity Comparison RE87 t = 0

ARW ARW Avg

RE87 t = 10 d

Mean

Standard Deviation

Mean

Standard Deviation

Page 12: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Tangential Velocity Spatial Correlations

Rankine Vortex RE87 t = 0 RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

-Surface tangential velocity correlations with respect to a point marked by ‘c’.

Page 13: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

RE87 t = 0 RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

-Surface Vu-Vv cross spatial correlations with respect to a point marked by ‘c’.

Vu-Vv Velocity Spatial Correlations

Rankine Vortex

Page 14: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Three-Dimensional Correlation Structures

Variables: U and V components of wind

Location: Surface point, ~90 km from vortex center

RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Page 15: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Three-Dimensional Correlation Structures

Variables: Perturbation Temperature and radial velocity

Location: ~12 km vertical, ~80 km from vortex center

RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Page 16: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Three-Dimensional Correlation Structures

Variables: Perturbation Temperature and vertical velocity

Location: ~9 km vertical ~90 km from vortex center

RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Page 17: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Three-Dimensional Correlation Structures RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Variables: Water vapor mixing ratio and vertical velocity

Location: ~11 km vertical ~18 km from vortex center

Page 18: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Three-Dimensional Correlation Structures RE87 t = 10 d

ARW Avg ARW

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Cross Correlations

Cross Spatial Correlations

Variables: Perturbation pressure and perturbation temperature

Location: ~6 km vertical ~9 km from vortex center

Page 19: Dynamics and Structure of Three- Dimensional Error Covariance … · 2010-12-30 · •2-dimensional x-z plane interpolated to 3-dimensions ... • Storms re-centered based on location

Summary and Conclusion We examined the flow-dependent structure of forecast error from an

axisymmetric vortex through a progression of simple to complex models:

Rankine vortex Rotunno-Emanual MPI model ARW Katrina

•  Synoptic scale correlation structures estimated from all three models were highly anisotropic and consistent with the underlying model dynamics.

•  When the two lower order models were tuned to fit Katrina forecasts, i.e. in terms of maximum tangential wind speed and radius of maximum winds, they provided dynamically similar correlation structures.

•  In fact, even with no changes made to the model dynamics, the RE87 model was able to resolve many of the same three-dimensional relationships observed with the WRF ensemble.

•  Results from our experiments raise the question of whether or not a low-order axisymmetric vortex model can be used to estimate flow-dependant background error covariance for future tropical cyclone prediction systems.


Recommended