E I A ADPLReport -...

E I A Report ADPL

1

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESMENT REPORT

FOR

EXISTING DISTILLERY UNIT ESTABLISHED IN THE YEAR 1948

By

AMRUT DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED

At

Kambipura

No. 49, 13th mile, kambipura,

Kambipura Village

Bangalore South Taluk

Bangalore Rural District

Bangalore 560074

By

M/s. Mahesh & Dev

No 17/1VSN Road Tasker Town

Bangalore 560051

E I A Report ADPL

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................

2. INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT ...............................................................................................

2.1 About the project proponent ..................................................................................................................

2.2 About the project ...................................................................................................................................

3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................

3.1 Type of Project ....................................................................................................................................

3.2 Project Location...................................................................................................................................

3.3 Major products of the company ...........................................................................................................

3.4 Details of alternate sites .......................................................................................................................

3.5 Size of Operation .................................................................................................................................

3.6 Project Description ..............................................................................................................................

3.7 Raw Material Required ........................................................................................................................

3.8 Resource optimization/recycling and reuse .........................................................................................

3.9 Power and fuels ...................................................................................................................................

3.10 Manpower ............................................................................................................................................

3.11 WATER REQUIREMENT .................................................................................................................

3.12 Utilities ................................................................................................................................................

3.13 Liquid waste management ...................................................................................................................

3.14 Air pollution control measures ............................................................................................................

3.15 Hazardous and solid waste management .............................................................................................

4. SITE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................

4.1 Connectivity ........................................................................................................................................

4.2 Landform, Land use, Landownership ..................................................................................................

4.4 Existing Land use pattern ....................................................................................................................

4.5. Existing Infrastructure: ...........................................................................................................................

4.6. Soil Classification: ..................................................................................................................................

4.7. Climatic data from secondary sources: ...................................................................................................

4.8. Social Infrastructure available: ...............................................................................................................

5.1. Planning concept .....................................................................................................................................

5.2. Population Projection ..............................................................................................................................

5.3. Land use planning ...................................................................................................................................

E I A Report ADPL

3

5.4. Assessment of Infrastructure Demand ....................................................................................................

5.5. Amenities/Facilities ................................................................................................................................

6 PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................................

6.1. Industrial Area: .......................................................................................................................................

6.2. Residential Area ......................................................................................................................................

6.3. Green belt ................................................................................................................................................

6.4. Social Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................

6.5. Connectivity ............................................................................................................................................

6.6. Drinking Water Management..................................................................................................................

6.7. Sewerage system .....................................................................................................................................

6.8. Industrial waste management ..................................................................................................................

6.9. Solid waste management .........................................................................................................................

6.10. Power Requirements and Supply/ Source ............................................................................................. 7 REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT (R & R) PLAN ....................................................................

7.1. Policy to be adopted (Central/ State) ......................................................................................................

8 PROJECT SCHEDULE AND COST ESTIMATE .............................................................................

8.1. Likely date of start of construction and likely date of completion..........................................................

8.2. Estimated project cost ............................................................................................................................. 9 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL ..............................................................................................................

9.1. Financial and social benefits ............................................................................................................... 10 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................... .

LIST OF FIGURES Project Site 10 km Radius around project site –TOPO SHEET

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

ADPL Amrut distilleries pvt ltd ETP Effluent Treatment Plant STP Sewage Treatment Plant kWh Kilowatt per hour

E I A Report ADPL

4

List of annexure

(i) Process description and process flow of products – Annexure-1

(ii) ETP Layout – Annexure- 2

(iii) Agreement for water supply – Annexure-3

(iv) Plant layout of proposed facility - Annexure -4.

(v) MB of raw materials and products – Annexure -5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Sl No. Particulars Details 1 Name of Company AMRUT DISTILLERIES PVT LTD

Estd in the year 1948 2 Location Existing :---Plot No. 49,13

TH Mile,

Kambipura,

Bangalore-560074

3 Project Activity,

Category as per amendments

Project schedule 5(g)

Category B

4 products of the project Malt & Grape spirit ,Jaggery spirit,

Bottling of IMFL,

5 Total Land area 4 acres, 6 Existing built up area 10432 m2

7 Proposed additional

built up area 2500 m2

8 Total built up area 12932 m2

9 Existing production capacity

Proposed product with capacity

Extra Neutral Alcohol – 9231 LPD Malt & Grape spirit -- 289 LPD Bottling of IMFL – 5770 cases/day

Malt & Grape spirit - 2596 LPD

Jaggery spirit - 385 LPD

Bottling of IMF L - 9616 cases/Day

10 Raw material Details as listed in page No.s 14 & 15 as

below ( material balance sheet attached 11 Fresh water requirement Details as listed in Pages 96 & 97 12 Waste water and mode of disposal Effluent shall be treated in existing

system and proposed ETP

Treated effluent shall be

recycled/reused to the extent and

Remaining shall be disposed on land for

gardening within premises

There will be no discharge of effluent

outside factory premises;

The unit shall be zero liquid discharge.

13 Power Contract demand ---- 490 kwh

E I A Report ADPL

5

(From BESCOM).

Existing emergency, DG sets of 625

kva,250kva,125kva,40 kva totalling

1040kva)

3 ton boiler,

4 ton boiler

14 Manpower Work force existing 5oo No.s sufficient.

15 Solid and hazardous waste Refer chapter 3, section 3.15, pg 36

16 Project cost (estimate) 12 Crores

2. INTRODUCTION OF THE PROJECT

2.1 About the project proponent

M/s Amrut distilleries Pvt ltd was established in the year 1948 by the

JAGDALE family and has a rich heritage status in the distillery industry. They

have a niche market for their products and have carved a reputation of

exporting single malt whiskies to the home land of whiskey that is Scotland and

the growth is phenomenally reaching heights in the high bracket premium

single malt whiskies.

1. Introduction of the project/Background information

i. Identification of project and project proponent. In case of mining project, a

copy of mining lease/letter of intent should be given.

AMRUT DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED

#49, 13th Mile, Kambipura,

Kambipura Village

Bangalore South Taluk

Bengaluru rural

Bangalore 560 074

Mr. MEYYAPPAN Director Technical

7 th Floor, J N R City Centre,

# 30, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road,

Bangalore 560 027

E I A Report ADPL

6

1. BACK GROUND

Project site discreption in general

Location of the proposed site No. 49, 13th mile, kambipura, kambipura village, Bangalore south taluk Bangalore 560074

National park Bannerghatta about 48 Kms Wild life sanctuary None National reserve None Mangrove forest None Biosphere reserve None Rain forest None Wet lands Not very significant Residential area Kambipura village 1.5 kms, Bidadi

town 1km, Grazing land None Historical monuments none Nearest railway station Kengeri - about 4kms Nearest national highway NH 207 about 21 kms Nearest air port Bangalore air port about 52 kms Rivers None Hills & vales Vrishbavathi valley Details of forests land in study area

none

Flora Coconut, tamarind, neem, etc Fauna Domestic animals Topography Latitude – 120 53’23.07”N

Longitude -77027’08.46”E Weather it is a part of national park

No

Weather it is a part of Wildlife sanctuary

No

Weather it is a part of Biosphere reserve

No

Rare and endangered flora & fauna

None

Habitat for migratory birds No Displacement of population No Requirement of raw material from any forest area

Not directly

E I A Report ADPL

7

PREAMBLE:

AMRUT DISTILLERIES PVT LTD (ADPL) is a company with a history dating back to

the late 1940’s. In the six decades and more since its inception as a fledgling and novice

organization in the field of liquor making, ADPL has made giant strides in the quality of its

products, diversity of its product portfolio, nature of its clientele and in the geographic

spread of its market.

While ADPL is today acknowledged as an important player in the IMFL industry in the

country, its products have created waves even outside India, most notably in the European

Union and in the North American continent. Its product AMRUT INDIAN SINGLE MALT

WHISKY (ASM) and its variants are today accepted as among the best Single Malt products

that the world has to offer. Evidence of its global standing is the plethora of awards that

ASM and its variants have won at no less than 25 different international forums. The

crowning glory is of course the rating as the 3rd Finest Whisky in the world that was

accorded to AMRUT FUSION Single Malt Whisky.

Apart from ASM, our premium rum, TWO INDIES, another premium whisky MAQINTOSH

SILVER EDITION WHISKY, etc have also gained widespread appreciation and acceptance.

It is therefore no exaggeration to state that the company is poised to build on its well-earned

reputation to scale ever greater heights.

With appreciation pouring from all directions, demand for the company’s products has also

been rising continuously over the past few years. To meet the rising demand while

maintaining and enhancing the quality of its products, the company has drawn up expansion

plans comprising

(vi) Production of 10,000 liters per month of spirit out of jiggery; and

(vii) Increase in malt & grape distillation capacity from the existing 7,500 liters per

month to 60,000 liters of Malt Spirit and 7,500 liters of Grape Spirit per

month;

(viii) Increase in the bottling capacity from the present 1, 50,000 cases per month

to 2, and 50,000 cases per month.

(i) The table below shows the existing capacity of all products and the

expected capacity after expansion plans proposed to be implemented.

E I A Report ADPL

8

Sl. Item Unit Capacity

Present Proposed

1 Extra Neutral Alcohol liters p.m. 5,00,000 5,00,000

(Re-distillation of Rectified Spirit)

2 Malt Spirit & Grape Spirit - do - 7,500 67,500

3 Jiggery Spirit - do - -- 10,000

4 Bottling of IML cases p.m. 1,50,000 2,50,000

MANUFACTURING PROCESS WRITE UP:

PRODUCTION OF SPIRIT OUT OF JAGGERY

Process Description:

Commercial Jaggery will be used for the manufacture of spirit out of jaggery. In this process,

jaggery is broken into smaller size and pitched into the ferment or by adding soft water in the

ratio of 1 unit of jaggery to 4.8 units of water. The mixture is stirred well till all the jaggery is

completely and well dissolved in the water. The pH of the wash is adjusted to 4.5 and Brix is

checked in the ferment or. Special yeast is added to the mixture in the ferment or and

fermentation is allowed at ambient temperature. Fermentation usually takes 3 to 4 days to

complete.

Once fermentation is complete, the fermented wash is filled in the Typical Brandy Pot still.

This is a special pot-still and has small column still wash plates attached to it which help in

rectifying the spirit to the desired level while also retaining the natural molasses congeners.

Low wines are collected in this distillation.

The Low Wines, along with the Heads and Tails of the previous batch are charged into the

still and the second distillation is carried out by Fractional Distillation in which Heads,

Hearts and Tails are distilled off based on boiling points. The Hearts, that is, the pure

Jaggery Spirit is reduced to 63% above and filled in Oakwood casks for maturation. After the

spirit attains the desired level of maturation, the matured jaggery spirit is used in Rum

E I A Report ADPL

9

blending as a component, contributing typical sweetish sugarcane and spicy character to the

product. Addition of matured jaggery spirit with all natural congeners intact lends a special

edge to the Rum over the conventional flavoured rums.

Annexure 1 is enclosed in the project report. It shows the process flow for production of

spirit out of Jaggery.

Investment:

The infrastructure and manpower available at the existing Kumbalgodu unit are adequate for

production of spirit out of jaggery. As production of grape spirit at this unit has been on the

decline in the recent past, there is surplus capacity available which could be easily deployed

towards production of jaggery spirit. Hence no additional investment is required for this

purpose.

3. PRODUCTION OF MALT SPIRIT

PROCESS DESCRIPTION:

Mashing:

Barley malt is milled and mashed with hot water and allowed to rest for an hour and drained,

cooled and pumped into the ferment or. Yeast is immediately pitched to the ferment or.

Thereafter, the second hot water is added and the mix is allowed to rest for 40 minutes.

After 40 minutes, the mix is drained, cooled and then pumped into the ferment or. The third

hot water is added and collected and pumped to the third water tank for use of first water of

the next brew at required temperature. The whole cycle of mashing takes about 6 hours.

Fermentation:

Two such brews are put in one ferment or under sterile conditions and allowed to ferment in

a temperature controlled environment. Fermentation usually takes about 5 days to

complete.

E I A Report ADPL

10

Distillation:

The fermented wash is distilled in typical copper pot-stills to get low wind at 18 – 19% above

and this wash distillation takes approximately 9 hours. The next charge of wash is repeated

in the same manner to get another low wine. Tow such low wines with Heads & Tails of

previous batches are mixed together and distilled in spirit still to collect the middle fraction

and Heads & Tails. The second distillation takes around 16 – 17 hours to complete.

Maturation:

The new make spirit is reduced to 62.8% Above by adding de-mineralized water (DM Water)

and filled in American Oakwood barrels for a minimum period of 4 years.

Bottling:

The required quantity of matured malt spirit is drawn from the selected barrels in the

required proportions and blended with Extra Neutral Alcohol (ENA). Where required, DM

Water is further added to reduce the strength to the required levels. The colour of the blend

is adjusted as per quality specifications and then filtered through sparkler filter before

bottling.

Process Flow Diagram & Project Investment are enclosed separately in the project report:

BOTTLING PLANT

The existing infrastructure and other facilities are sufficient for bottling of 2, 50,000 c/s per

month and no additional investment is required. As and when required, the plant may be

operated on two shifts to meet production requirements.

The bottling plant does not generate any effluents.

The Rum market in India is dominated mostly by artificially Flavoured Rums with the quality differential between low-range

And premium range Rums attributable more to the quality of Encased and the period, if any, over which the Rum has been matured. Internationally, however,

E I A Report ADPL

11

premium, genuine rums are directly distilled from molasses or sugarcane juice and yield a unique Flavour that cannot be mimicked by artificially flavoured rums.

We at ADL have focused our efforts in producing genuine Rum that will additionally underline its Indian origins. Our R & D In this direction has shown that rum made with spirit produced out Of jiggery is extremely close to genuine rums as they share most of the characteristics of the latter. Besides, jiggery being an article not Produced elsewhere, Rum made with jiggery-spirit also emphasizes Its Indian origin and uniqueness.

Our market survey has also shown that there a substantial Demand for genuine rums, particularly in Europe where rums of Caribbean origins are currently dominant among imported rums. As we already have an established marketing network for marketing AMRUT SINGLE MALT, we are also in strong position to market genuine rums of Indian origin. There is thus a market overseas waiting to be tapped.

It is in this background that we have conceived the proposal To produce spirit out of jiggery for use in making premium quality Rums meant mostly for exports outside India. II PROCESS FLOW AND EQUIPMENT Following is a brief description of the process involved in Producing spirit out of Jaggery. Enclosed at Annexure I & II is a flow chart that graphically demonstrates the above process flow.

Taking into account the demand for premium quality rums, The period needed for launching and popularizing our Product and other relevant factors, we plan to initially Introduce a small quantity of rum with spirit made out of Jaggery; most of this production would be exported out of India though a portion could be sold within Karnataka/India. Production of this quantity/quality of rum would require Jaggery-spirit of a suitable maturation period.

The infrastructure and manpower available at our Kumbalgodu unit are adequate for production of spirit out of Jaggery. As production of grape spirit at this unit has been on The decline in the recent past, there is surplus capacity Available which could be easily deployed towards production Of spirit out of Jaggery. This production of Jaggery spirit can be Easily handled by the existing infrastructure and does not Require any additional investment worth mentioning. III RAW MATERIAL The primary raw material is Jaggery which is locally produced In the state. As is well- known, Karnataka, being a net Exporter, is a surplus state in so far as availability of Jaggery is Concerned. Besides, our requirement is a mere 0.2% of total Production of Jaggery within the state. Considering all these, We anticipate no difficulties in sourcing Jaggery in sufficient

E I A Report ADPL

12

Quantities to meet out requirements. Other material such as yeast, etc is already part of our Existing procurement routines and would pose no logistical Or other difficulties in sourcing. ANNEXURE-I Commercial Jaggery can be used for the manufacturing of Spirit out jJggery. In this process we take the Jaggery and break it Into the smaller size and pitched it into the ferment or by adding The soft water in the ratio. It is stirred well till all the Jaggery gats Completely dissolved in the water. The ph of the wash is adjusted to 4.5, Brix is checked in the ferment or. Special yeast is added in The ferment or and fermentation is allowed at ambient Temperature. Fermentation may take 3 to 4 days to complete. Once the fermentation is complete, the fermented wash is Taken in the typical Brandy pot still which is special in the sense That it has a small column still wash plates attached to it that helps In rectifying the spirit to our desired level so that the natural Molasses congeners are retained in the spirit. Low wines are Collected in this distillation. These Low wines along with the Heads And Tails of the previous batch are charged into the still and the Second distillation is carried out by following the Fractional Distillation in which we distil off the Heads the hearts and the tails Based on the boiling points. The hearts that is the pure Jaggery Spirit is reduced to 63% above. And filled in the casks for Maturation. After attaining the desired maturation, it can be used In the Rum Blending as a component, contributing the typical Sweetish sugarcane and spicy character to the product as all these Natural congeners are retained in the by following a specially Developed technique of fractional Distillation in the typical pot still Thereby giving a special edge to the Rum product over the Conventional flavoured rums.

ii. Brief description of nature of the project

a. ADPL is today acknowledged as an important player in the IMFL industry in

the country; its products have created waves even outside India, most notably

in the European Union and in the North American continent. Its product

AMRUT INDIAN SINGLE MALT WHISKY (ASM) and its variants are today

accepted as among the best Single Malt products that the world has to offer.

Evidence of its global standing is the plethora of awards that ASM and its

variants have won at no less than 25 different international forums. The

crowning glory is of course the rating as the 3rd Finest Whisky in the world

that was accorded to AMRUT FUSION Single Malt Whisky.

iii. Need for the project and its importance to the country and or region.

E I A Report ADPL

13

The industry was started in the year 1948 and shifted to the present location

in the 80’s and it is well reputed for labour generation and alot of families are

dependent on the employment opportunities

iv. Demand-supply Gap.

Demand for the company’s products has also been rising continuously over

the past few years. To meet the rising demand while maintaining and

enhancing the quality of its products, the company has drawn up

expansion plans comprising Production of 10,000 liters per month of spirit

out of jiggery; and Increase in malt & grape distillation capacity from the

existing 7,500 liters per month to 60,000 liters of Malt Spirit and 7,500

liters of Grape Spirit per month;

v. Imports vs. Indigenous production.

We have a fraction of the raw materials as imports like the casks and peat.

vi. Domestic/export markets.

We have niche market in the local geography and an excellent reputation in

the export market hence this expansion

vii. Employment Generation (Direct and Indirect) due to the project

We are directly employing 500 workers and supporting the villagers nearby

with indirect employment.

2. Project description

i. Type of project including interlinked and interdependent projects, if

any.

The project is a blending and bottling activity

ii. Location (map showing general location, specific location, and project

boundary & project site layout) with coordinates.

Google map enclosed

E I A Report ADPL

14

E I A Report ADPL

15

E I A Report ADPL

16

iii. Details of alternate sites, considered and the basis of selecting the

proposed site particularly the environmental considerations gone into

should be highlighted.

iv. Size or magnitude of operation.

Malt & Grape spirit - - 2596 lts/D

Jaggery Spirit -- 385 lts/D

Bottling of IML - - 9616 cases/D

Existing land area - 4 acres

Additional leased area - 6 acres

(Lease agreement attached)

Existing ---- 10432 sqmts

Additional --- 2500 sqmts

(1750 sqmts of Ware house and 750 sqmts bottling plant for Malt)

Total BUA --- 12932 sqmts

Cost of the proposed modernization and additional facility will be 12 crores.

E I A Report ADPL

17

v. Project description with process details (a schematic diagram/flow

chart showing the project layout components of the project etc. Should

be given)

Annexure - 1

E I A Report ADPL

18

E I A Report ADPL

19

FLOW DIAGRAME

vi.

JAGGERY PULVERIZATION FERMENTATION

DISTILLATION

JAGGERY SPIRIT

MATURATION

BLENDING & BOTTLING

E I A Report ADPL

20

FLOW DIAGRAM-MALT PLANT

vii.

CLEARWORTTO

viii.

ix.

MALT RECEIVER+LOW

WINE RECEIVER

TO SPENT

GRAIN

SILO

MILLING

SECTION

GRIST

STORAGE

CIP

TANKS

MASH

TUN PLATE HEAT

EXCHANGER

FERMENTOR

HOT WATER

TANK

CHILLED

WATER

TANK

WASH STILL

SPIRIT STILL

E I A Report ADPL

21

vi. Raw material required along with estimated quantity, likely source,

marketing area of final product/s, made of transport of raw material

and finished product.

RAW MATERIAL

The primary raw material is Jaggery which is locally

produced in the state. As is well- known, Karnataka, being a

net exporter, is a surplus state in so far as availability of

Jaggery is concerned. Besides, our requirement is a mere

0.2% of total production of Jaggery within the state.

Considering all these, we anticipate no difficulties in sourcing

Jaggery in sufficient quantities to meet out requirements.

Other material such as yeast, etc is already part of our

existing procurement routines and would pose no logistical

or other difficulties in sourcing.

Annexure - 2

E I A Report ADPL

22

E I A Report ADPL

23

E I A Report ADPL

24

Vii Resource optimization/recycling and reuse envisaged in the project, if any

should be briefly outlined.

09 kld Existing ETP is proposed to be upgraded to 90kld to handle the

effluents

Adequacy report is prepared to check the adequacy of the existing ETP, and recommend the

required up-gradation of CETP as necessary to meet the combined existing and proposed

effluent load due to the proposed expansion and for treating the same and conserving the

entire treated effluent on own land for irrigation confirming to KSPCB on land discharge

standards.

Further, it is to be noted that there will not be any additional Air Pollution Sources envisaged

due to the proposed expansion.

Broken bottles/glass --14.2 tons/M

Paper waste -- 9.5 ton/M

Spent Grain -- 30.7ton/M

ETP sludge -- 45Kgs/Day

Waste oils -- 80lts/M

The wastes are segregated at source and disposed as under

Glass factory,

Paper Recycling units

Animal feed manufacturers

Manure for gardening

Official recyclers approved by KSPCB

MOU with agencies annexed

Viii Availability of water its source, Energy/power requirement and source should

be given.

Details are attached under

XI. Quantity of wastes to be generated (liquid and solid) and scheme for their

Management/disposal.

Details are attached as under

X. Schematic representations of the feasibility drawing which give information of

EIA purpose.

Flow charts production lay outs are attached

3 Site Analysis

E I A Report ADPL

25

i. Connectivity.

The plant is very well connected to the SH 17 connecting Bangalore to Mysore

ii. Land Form, Land use and Land ownership.

Land owned by the promoters

iii. Topography (along with map).

Attached as under

iv. Existing land use pattern (agriculture, non-agriculture, forest, water

bodies (including area under CRZ), shortest distances from the periphery

of the project to periphery of the forests, national park, wild Ufa sanctuary,

eco sensitive areas, water bodies (distance form, the HFL of the river),

CRZ. In case of notified industrial area, a copy of the Gazette notification

should be given.

Located in the midst of industrial activity zone

v. Existing Infrastructure.

We are well equipped to undertake production with the existing infrastructure and we are only

building a ware house and excise bonded space.

vi. Soil classification

Report with specifications attached

E I A Report ADPL

26

E I A Report ADPL

27

E I A Report ADPL

28

vii. Climatic data from secondary sources

FEB

E I A Report ADPL

29

MARCH

E I A Report ADPL

30

APRIL

E I A Report ADPL

31

Statistics based on observations taken between 10/2013 - 04/2016 daily from 7am to 7pm

local time in Bangalore

Bangalore weather station: 921 m.a.s.l., 11.0 km away from Kengeri Satellite Town

Sl no. Direction % Wind 1 N 0.7 2 NNE 1 3 NE 5.5 4 ENE 2.5 5 ENE 30.3 6 ESE 4.2 7 SE 10.9 8 SSE 0.4 9 S 2 10 SSW 2.8 11 SW 23.3 12 WSW 3.4 13 WSW 6.1 14 WNW 1.5 15 NW 4.6 16 NNW 0.5

E I A Report ADPL

32

Sl. No.

PARAMETERS Second Revision IS 10500 ics no 13.060.20

Results

Observed Protocol

Unit max Required Permissible

1 Color hazen units Max

-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987

2 Odor Agreeable Agreeable IS 3025( Part-5)1983

3 Turbidity NTU 1 5 1.6 IS 3025( Part-10) 1984

4 Conductivity in µs/cm -- 1550 IS 3025( Part-14) 1984

5 Total Dissolved Solids

mg/L 500 2000 1008 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984

6 pH Value Value 6.5 to 8.5 6.61 IS 3025( Part-11) 1983

7 Total Hardness as CaCO3

mg/L 200 600 668 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009

8 Calcium as Ca mg/L 75 200 235 IS 3025( Part -40) 2004

9 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 30 100 19 IS 3025( Part -46) 2003

10 Iron (as Fe) mg/L 0.3 NR ND IS 3025( Part -53) 2003

11 Chlorides (as Cl) mg/L 250 1000 272 IS 3025( Part -32) 1988

12 Sulphates as SO4 mg/L 200 400 11 IS 3025( Part -24) 1986

13 Nitrates (as No3) mg/L 45 NR 12 IS 3025( Part -34) 1988

14 Fluoride as F mg/L 1.0 1.5 0.05 IS 3025( Part -60) 2008

15 Total Alkalinity mg/L 200 600 194 IS 3025( Part -23)1986

Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987

2 Odor Agreeable Agreeable IS 3025( Part-5)1983




mg/L 500 2000 104 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 28 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009









E I A Report ADPL

33

Sl. No. PARAMETERS Unit Limits Observed Values

Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 7.16 IS 3025 (Part.11)

2 Color Pt.Co ---- 5 IS 3025 (Part.4)

3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)

4 Oil & Grease mg/L ---- 9 IS 3025 (Part.39)

5 Conductivity Micro ohms/ cm Max µs/cm ---- 700 IS 3025( Part-14)

6 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L ---- 455 IS 3025 (Part 16)

7 Total Suspended Solids mg/L ---- 3 IS 3025 (Part.17)

8 BOD 3 days at 27 o

C mg/L ---- 40 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 100 IS 3025 (Part.58)

10 Chloride mg/L ---- 56 IS 3025 (Part.32)

11 Sulphate mg/L ---- 2 IS 3025 (Part.24)


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.32 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 15 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 40 IS 3025 (Part.58)



E I A Report ADPL

34


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 4.77 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Pungent IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 70 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 160 IS 3025 (Part.58)



Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987

2 Odor Agreeable agreeable IS 3025( Part-5)1983




mg/L 500 2000 260 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 192 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009



10 Iron (as Fe) mg/L 0.3 NR 0.1 IS 3025( Part -53) 2003






E I A Report ADPL

35


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.8 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Odorless IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 160 IS 3025 (Part.44)



Sl. No. PARAMETERS Unit Limits Observed values

Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.12 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 80 IS 3025 (Part.44)



E I A Report ADPL

36


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 7.01 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 70 IS 3025 (Part.44)



Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 12 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987

2 Odor Agreeable Pungent IS 3025( Part-5)1983




mg/L 500 2000 5915 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 64 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009


9 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 30 100 ND IS 3025( Part -46) 2003





14 Fluoride as F mg/L 1.0 1.5 ND IS 3025( Part -60) 2008

15

Bacteriological MPN

Nos Must not be detectable in

any 100 ml sample

7 IS 1622 1987

Amendment No 4

May 2003

16 Ecoli or Thermotolornet

Coliform

Bacteria

Nos

Must not be detectable in

any 100 ml sample

Absent

IS 1622 1987

Amendment No 4

May 2003


E I A Report ADPL

37

Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 12 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987





mg/L 500 2000 5980 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 40 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009


9 Magnesium as Mg mg/L 30 100 ND IS 3025( Part -46) 2003






15

Bacteriological MPN


any 100 ml sample

11 IS 1622 1987

Amendment No 4

May 2003

16

Ecoli or Thermotolornet

Coliform

Bacteria

Nos


any 100 ml sample

Absent

IS 1622 1987

Amendment No 4

May 2003


E I A Report ADPL

38


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 3.99 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)


5 Conductivity Micro ohms/

cm Max µs/cm ---- 5100 IS 3025( Part-14)




C mg/L ---- 80 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 250 IS 3025 (Part.58)




Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.06 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Odorless IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 60 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 90 IS 3025 (Part.58)



E I A Report ADPL

39


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 4.69 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 40 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 180 IS 3025 (Part.58)



Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol


1 Color hazen units Max -- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987




5 Total Dissolved Solids mg/L 500 2000 1755 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 668 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009








15

Bacteriological MPN

Nos Must not be detectable in any 100 ml

sample

ND IS 1622 1987

Amendment

No 4 May

2003 16

Ecoli or

Ther

moto

lorne

t

Colif

orm

Bacte

ria

Nos

Must not be detectable in any 100 ml

sample

Absent

IS 1622 1987

Amendment

No 4 May

2003 17 Total Alkalinity mg/L 200 600 1796 IS 3025( Part -

23)1986

E I A Report ADPL

40

Sl. No.

PARAMETERS Second Revision IS 10500 ics no 13.060.20 Results

Observe

d

Protocol Unit max Required Permissible


-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987


3 Turbidity NTU 1 5 6 IS 3025( Part-10) 1984



mg/L 500 2000 1755 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 652 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009


9 Magnesium as Mg

mg/L 30 100 36 IS 3025( Part -46) 2003


11 Chlorides (as Cl)

mg/L 250 1000 404 IS 3025( Part -32) 1988




15

Bacteriological MPN

Nos Must not be

detectable

in any

100 ml

sample

ND IS 1622 1987

Amendment

No 4 May 2003

16

Ecoli or Thermotolornet Coliform

Bacteria

Nos

Must not be

detectable

in any

100 ml

sample

Present

IS 1622 1987

Amendment

No 4 May 2003


E I A Report ADPL

41

Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987





mg/L 500 2000 390 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 625 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009









Sl. No.

PARAMETERS Unit Limits Observed Values

Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 4.72 IS 3025 (Part.11)








C mg/L ---- 310 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 950 IS 3025 (Part.58)



E I A Report ADPL

42

Sl. No.


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.64 IS 3025 (Part.11)






7 Total Suspended Solids mg/L ---- 0.5 IS 3025 (Part.17)


C mg/L ---- 50 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 150 IS 3025 (Part.58)



Sl. No.


Results

Observed Protocol



-- 5 15 5 IS 3025( Part-4) 1987





mg/L 500 2000 130 IS 3025( Part-16) 1984



mg/L 200 600 40 IS 3025( Part -21) 2009








15

Bacteriological MPN


any 100 ml sample

ND IS 1622 1987 Amendment

No 4 May 2003

16

Ecoli or Thermotolornet

Coliform

Bacteris

Nos


any 100 ml sample

Absent

IS 1622 1987 Amendment

No 4 May 2003


E I A Report ADPL

43

Sl. No.


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 3.69 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 50 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 168 IS 3025 (Part.58)



Sl. No.


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.33 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 15 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 50 IS 3025 (Part.58)



E I A Report ADPL

44


Protocol

1 pH Value ---- 6.32 IS 3025 (Part.11)


3 Odor ---- ---- Poul IS 3025 (Part.5)






C mg/L ---- 15 IS 3025 (Part.44)

9 COD mg/L ---- 40 IS 3025 (Part.58)



E I A Report ADPL

45

E I A Report ADPL

46

E I A Report ADPL

47

E I A Report ADPL

48

E I A Report ADPL

49

E I A Report ADPL

50

E I A Report ADPL

51

Ambient Air Quality Studies (L1 to L6)

E I A Report ADPL

52


E I A Report ADPL

53


E I A Report ADPL

54


E I A Report ADPL

55


E I A Report ADPL

56


E I A Report ADPL

57


E I A Report ADPL

58


E I A Report ADPL

59


E I A Report ADPL

60

viii. Social Infrastructure available.

Well developed area with industries surrounding and very socially forward.

5. Planning Brief

i. Planning concept (type of industries, facilities, transportation etc) Town

and country planning/Development authority classification.

Permission obtained for industry license issued by the Dept of industries

ii. Population Projection

Static population growth since it is an existing industry with no increase of

labour the natural phenomenon of population increase is imminent

iii. Land use planning (breakup along with green belt etc).

Plant layout attached

iv. Assessment of Infrastructure Demand (Physical & Social).

Very sufficient

v. Amenities/Facilities.

As described in the worker welfare description notes attached along with

E I A Report ADPL

61

6. Proposed Infrastructure

i. Industrial Area (Processing Area).Details as per below

E I A Report ADPL

62

Site plan

Annexure – 3

E I A Report ADPL

63

ii. Residential Area (Non Processing Area).

N A

iii. Green Belt.

iv. Social Infrastructure.

Sufficiently adequate

v. Connectivity (Traffic and Transportation Road/Rail/metro/water ways

etc)

E I A Report ADPL

64

Attached to the SH 17

vi. Drinking water Management (source & supply of water)

As described below

WATER REQUIRMENT

SUMMARY

1. Malt Spirit Production 33,200

2. Jiggery Spirit Production 4,700

3. Grape Spirit Plant 500

4. RD Plant (dilution water only) 40,000

5. Boiler House (net requirement) 20,000

6. R/O Plant 65,700

7. Wash water for IML Bottling Plant 2,000

8. Cooling Tower (make up water) 15,000

Total 1, 81,100

E I A Report ADPL

65

E I A Report ADPL

66

E I A Report ADPL

67

VII. Sewerage system.

E I A Report ADPL

68

WATER

The Water Balance of the entire plant both existing and after expansion is shown in

Annexure 1 of this report.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT:

The entire process effluent classified as Stream-1 after pH correction flows in to

Anaerobic Lagoon, followed by Up-flow filter and is further treated by single stage

Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Plant .

The domestic effluent classified as stream-2 is collected in an independent

equalization, from here it is pumped directly @ inlet of the Aeration tank where in it

mixes with stream-1 effluent. The combined effluent stream-1 and stream-2 are

treated by Single Stage Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Plant. And the entire

treated effluent confirming to KSPCB Standards are disposed on land for gardening.

WASTE WATER QUANTITY AND QUALITY: (Existing + Proposed

Expansion)

(Vide Water Balance Chart-Annexure-1)

The entire effluent streams are classified in to 4 Streams based on their

Organic strength as detailed below:

STREAM-1 – LOW STRENGTH WASTE STREAM

ADPL will have a total work force of around 400 persons which includes both

existing and proposed expansion completed. With in house canteen facility.

(Accordingly considering the per capita consumption at 55 LPCD

Daily water requirement for domestic consumption will be 400x55= 22 KLD Sewage

Generation Quantity at 85% of domestic consumption will be 18.7 OR Say 19KLD .

The total sewage quantity with the expansion completed will be 19 KLD.

STREAM-I Domestic Effluent:

Design Flow: 19 KLD

E I A Report ADPL

69

BOD-300-400mg/lt

COD -600-800 mg/lt

TSS -100-200 mg/lt

PH-6-8

STREAM-2 – LOW STRENGTH WASTE STREAM

Washing Effluent Viz: Filter Back wash, RO-reject, Boiler Blow

down, Softeners

Regeneration

Design Flow: 16 KLD

PH- 9.8

TDS-1382 mg/lt

STREAM -2& 3-MEDIUM STRENGTH WASTE STREAM

Washing Effluent Viz: RO–Reject, RO back wash, Bottling Washing

Machines, Blending

Cleaning, Kettle Cleaning

Design Flow: (Stream2 + Stream3)16KLD +38KLD=54KLD

BOD- 1900-2000mg/lt

COD - 3900-4000 mg/lt

TSS - 1500 mg/lt

pH - 7.8-9

STREAM -4 - HIGH STRENGTH WASTE STREAM + PRE TREATED

STREAM2+STREAM-3

Effluent: Spent wash +Spent Leese

Design Flow: Stream2,3 & Stream 4 –(54KLD+17 KLD=71 KLD)

BOD- 5600-6000 mg/lt

E I A Report ADPL

70

COD -10,441 mg/lt

TSS - 2300 mg/lt

pH - 4-5

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EFFLUENT TREATMENT- PLANT:

Stream-1 :

Domestic effluent with a maximum flow of 19KLD is gravitated as an independent

stream in to Bar Screen chamber for physical separation of solids, followed by

equalization for flow balancing with pre-aeration, which will be further pumped in to

the secondary biological treatment at the inlet of I stage Aeration tank designed as II

stage Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Process (EAASP).

Stream-2 & Stream-3:

The stream-2 &3 effluents with a maximum flow of (16KLD + 38KLD ) will be

gravitated as an common stream in to Bar Screen chamber for physical separation of

solids, followed by equalization/neutralization for flow balancing with pre-aeration,

and pH adjustment The neutralized effluent will be further mixed with stream-4 at

the inlet of existing Anaerobic lagoon . and further treated in the secondary biological

treatment at the inlet of I stage Aeration tank designed as II stage EAASP. Where in

it mixes with stream-1 effluent for further treatment.

Stream-4:

The Stream-4 effluents with a maximum flow of 16.76KLD 0R say 17KLD will be

gravitated as an independent stream in to Bar Screen chamber for physical

separation of solids, and then after pH correction flows in to the existing Anaerobic

lagoon, where it mixes with stream 2&3 and than the pre –treated stream-4 effluent

flows in to the existing aeration tank which shall be used as intermediate

equalization tank. The combined stream will be further treated by II stage EAASP.

After 2 stage biological treatment. The combined treated effluent post filtration and

chlorination will be used on own land for gardening, floor wash,

DESIGN OF PROPOSED EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT UNITS:

E I A Report ADPL

71

I. DESIGN OF STREAM-1 PRE-TREATMENT UNITS:

Solid Screening: Bar Screen Chamber :( Stream-1-Domestic

Effluent) (Proposed):

The entire domestic effluent classified as Stream-1 with a maximum quantity of 19

KLD, will be gravitated through a separate network of underground pipe work into

the Bar screen chamber of size:1.0mx1.0mx 1.5m TD..

Provide a chamber of size 1.0m x 1.0m depth to suit sewer gradient, accommodate an

inclined bar screen with opening less than 10 mm. Provide a bar screen of 20x6 mm

flats with 10 mm spacing in between.

Design criteria:

Design flow = 19 KLD (Existing=3KLD+Proposed =16KLD)

Velocity through screen = 0.8 m/sec

Net area of screen = 0.00024/0.8 = 0.00030 sq. m

Gross area = 1.2 times the net area of opening

Gross area = 1.2x0.00030=0.00036 sq. m.

Proposed Size of the screen = 1.0 meter wide x1.0 meter long x 1.5 m TD

is adequate.

Equalisation Tank: (Proposed)

The effluent from the Bar Screen Chamber will flow in to the existing equalization

tank, of minimum 24hrs capacity. This tank is provided to even out the flow

variation, and to provide a continuous feed in to the secondary biological treatment

units.

Design Flow = 19 cum/day (Existing=3KLD+Proposed =16KLD)

Holding capacity proposed = 24 hours

Proposed Size of Tank = 3mx3mx 2.1 SWD +0.9m Free board

Mode of mixing Proposed = fine bubble diffused aeration for

Pre-aeration

Hence Adequate

E I A Report ADPL

72

Raw Sewage Pumps: (Proposed)

Since the secondary treatment plant are located on a higher contour, the effluent will

be pumped from the equalisation tank in to the Aeration tank.

Pumps - 2 No. s = one working and one standby.

Type = open impeller non clog pumps.

Capacity = 5 cum/Hr @ 12-15 m Head

Hence Adequate

DESIGN OF STREAM-2 & STREAM-3 PRE-TREATMENT UNITS:

The Stream-2 &3 effluents with a maximum flow of (16 KLD + 38 KLD ) will be



and pH adjustment The neutralized effluent will be further pumped in to the

secondary biological treatment at the inlet of I stage Aeration tank designed as II

stage EAASP. Where in it mixes with stream-1 effluent for further treatment.

STREAM-2 & 3:

Solid Screening: Bar Screen Chamber: (Proposed).

The entire effluent washings, with a maximum quantity of 54 KLD , will be

gravitated through a network of underground pipe work into the Bar screen

chamber of size:1.2mx1.5mx 1.5m TD.

Provide a chamber of size 1.2m x 1.5m depth to suit sewer gradient, accommodate an

inclined bar screen with opening less than 10 mm. Provide a bar screen of 20x6 mm

flats with 10 mm spacing in between.

Design criteria:





Gross area = 1.2x0.00078=0.000936 sq. m.

Proposed Size of the screen = 1.2 meter wide x 1.5meter long x 1.5 m TD

is adequate.

E I A Report ADPL

73

Equalization Tank & Neutralization Tank: (Proposed)

The effluent from the Bar Screen Chamber will flow in to the existing equalization

tank, of minimum 24 hrs capacity. This tank is provided to even out the flow

variation, and to provide a continuous feed in to the secondary biological treatment

units.

Design Flow = 54 cum/day(Existing=6KLD+Proposed

=48KLD)

Holding capacity Proposed = 24 hours

Proposed volume of the tank = 40 cum.-2 No (Hence adequate)

Provide 2 No tank each of size = 4mx4mx3.0m TD-2 No

Provide 2 No. Agitators 1 No in each tank with necessary dozing arrangement for

rapid mixing and pH correction.

Raw Effluent Pumps :( Proposed):

Since the secondary treatment plants are located on a higher contour, the equalized,

neutralized effluent will be pumped from the equalization /neutralization tank in to I

stage aeration tank.



Capacity = 8 cum/Hr @ 12 m-15m Head

DESIGN OF STREAM-4 PRE-TREATMENT UNITS: STREAM-4:

a. SOLID SCREENING: INLET CHAMBER: (Existing):

The entire effluent washings, with a maximum quantity of 16.76 KLD or say 17KLD,

will be gravitated through a network of underground pipe work into the existing inlet

chamber of size: 1.0mx1.0mx 1.2m TD.

Provided a chamber of size 1.0m x 1.0m depth to suit sewer gradient, accommodate

an inclined bar screen with opening less than 10 mm. Provide a bar screen of 20x6

mm flats with 10 mm spacing in between.

Design criteria:

E I A Report ADPL

74





Gross area = 1.2x0.00025=0.0003 sq. m.

Existing Size of the screen = 1.0 meter wide x 1.0meter long x 1.2 m TD

Is adequate.

ANAEROBIC LAGOON: (Existing)

The effluent from the Inlet Chamber post neutralization will flow in to the existing

anaerobic lagoon, of minimum 26 DAYS holding capacity. The anaerobic

decomposition will take place specifically designed for high BOD & COD reductions.

Design Flow = 17 cum/day (Existing=3KLD+Proposed

=14KLD)

Design Flow (Stream2+Stream3+Stream-4) = (16+38+17=71 KLD)

Design BOD = 6000 mg/lt

Envisaged Efficiency post treatment = 70% average

BOD at the out let of Anaerobic lagoon = 1800 MG/LT

Existing volume of the tank = 1800 cum. (Hence adequate)

INTERMEDIATE EQUALIZATION TANK: (Existing Aeration Tank – Used

As Intermediate Equalization Tank)

The effluent over flow from the Anaerobic Lagoon will flow in to the existing Aeration

tank now proposed to be used as intermediate equalization tank, of minimum 24hrs

capacity. The stream-1, stream2&3 from their respective equalization /neutralization

tanks will be pumped in to this Combined Effluent Intermediate Equalization Tank.

The combined all 4 streams from the equalization tank will be pumped in to the

proposed II stage EAASP plant followed by filtration

Design Flow = 90 cum/day (Stream-

1+Stream2&3+Stream-4)

Holding capacity existing = 33 hours

Existing volume of the tank = 125 cum.

Existing Size of Tank = 10mx5mx 2.5m SWD

E I A Report ADPL

75

Mode of mixing Proposed = F fine bubble diffused aeration for

Pre-aeration

Hence Adequate

RAW EFFLUENT TRANSFER PUMPS: (Proposed)

Since the secondary treatment plant are located on a higher contour, the

effluent will be pumped from the equalization tank in to the proposed I stage

Aeration tank.



Capacity = 8 cum/Hr @ 12-15 m Head

Hence Adequate

TWO STAGE EXTENDED AERATION ACTIVATED SLUDGE

TREATMENT:

AERATION TANK I STAGE: (STREAM-1+ STREAM2+STREAM-

3+STREAM-4) :

The Pre-treated effluent (Stream-1, 2, 3&4) is pumped from the respective

equalization / neutralization tank in to first stage aeration tank & is further treated

by second stage extended aeration activated sludge treatment which results in the

reduction of BOD, and COD by 95 to 97%.

Design Flow = 90 KLD

DESIGN BOD = 1500-2000mg/lt

ASSUMPTIONS

MLSS = 4000 mg/lt

F/M = 0.10

Total BOD load = 180 kg/day

Aeration tank volume required = 450 cu. M

E I A Report ADPL

76

Provide Aeration tank size = 15 m x 9 m x 3.5m SWD -1no.

Hence adequate.

DIFFUSED AERATION SYSTEM:

Kg of BOD/day = 180

Kg of oxygen required/day = 360

(Considering 2 kg of oxygen required/day for every Kg of BOD removed.)

%age of oxygen in air = 0.23

Density of air = 1.2

%age of oxygen transfer at 3.5 m SWD = 0.20

Therefore air requirement in cum/hr = 700 ------A

Transfer rate of oxygen in 1mt long membrane diffusers = 10cum/hr

Number of membranes required is 700/10 = 70 No

Provide 70 meter (i.e 1 meter-70 No in suitable rows to be provided in I stage

Aeration tank to ensure uniform air distribution).

Hence adequate.

SECONDARY CLARIFIER I STAGE:

The over flow from the I stage aeration tank is taken in to the secondary clarifier for

separation of biological floc.

Average flow = 90 cu. m/day

Design flow = 180 cu .m/day

(Considering 2 times the average flow to accommodate for sludge volume)

Sludge Re-circulation = 100%

Surface loading = 25 cu. m/sq. m/day

Required Area of Clarifier = 7.2 sq. m

E I A Report ADPL

77

Required Size of clarifier = 4m x4mx3m SWD

Provide Size of clarifier = 4mx4mx 3m SWD

Hence adequate.

AERATION TANK-II STAGE:

The over flow from the Clarifier is further treated by Second stage extended aeration

activated sludge treatment which results in the reduction of BOD and COD by 95 to

97%.

Design Flow = 90 KLD

DESIGN BOD = 400 mg/lt

(Considering 80% BOD removal in I stage treatment)

ASSUMPTIONS

MLSS = 4000 mg/lt

F/M = 0.10

Total BOD load = 36 kg/day

Aeration tank volume required = 90 cu. M

Provide a Aeration tank size = 7 m x 4m x 3.5 m SWD -1No

Hence adequate

DIFFUSED AERATION SYSTEM:

Kg of BOD/day = 36

Kg of oxygen required/day = 72

(Considering 2 kg of oxygen required/day for every Kg of BOD removed).

%age of oxygen in air = 0.23

Density of air = 1.2

%age of oxygen transfer at 3.5 m SWD = 0.2

E I A Report ADPL

78

Therefore air requirement in cum/hr = 150 ------B

Transfer rate of oxygen in 1mt long membrane diffusers = 10cum/hr

Number of membranes required is 150/10 = 15

Provide 15 meter (i.e 1 meter-15 No in suitable rows to be provided in II stage

Aeration tank to ensure uniform air distribution).

Provide capacity of blowers 2 No. blowers of capacity 300 cum/hr –2 Nos operating

at a pressure of 0.5 KSC pressure, (The provided capacity of blower will meet air

requirement for aeration tank II stage, Sewage & Effluent equalization tank for pre-

aeration ).

Hence adequate

FINAL CLARIFIER:

The over flow from the II stage aeration tank is taken in to the final clarifier for

separation of biological floc.

Average flow = 90 cu. m/day

Design flow = 180 cu .m/day

(Considering 2 times the average flow to accommodate for sludge volume)

Sludge Re-circulation = 100%

Surface loading = 25 cu. m/sq. m/day

Required Area of Clarifier = 7.2 sq. m

Required Size of clarifier = 4m x4mx3m SWD

Provide Size of clarifier = 4mx4mx 3m SWD

Hence adequate.

E I A Report ADPL

79

SLUDGE DRYING BEDS : -6 Nos

To de-water & dry the excess sludge generated from the above treatment.

Drying period : 10 days

Sludge loading rate : 0.25 kg/sq. m

Proposed minimum Size : 5m x 5m x 1.5 m-6 no.s

Capacity : 150 Sq. m

Hence adequate

SLUDGE PUMPS:

Available 4 No. pumps –2 no for the first stage clarifier & 2no for the second

Stage clarifier. With one working and one standby)

Capacity : 10 cum/hr @ 12 m head-4 NOS

Type : Open Impeller Non Clog centrifugal mono block pumps

Solid handling size : up to 50 mm

Hence adequate

Duty:

To pump the excess biological sludge from the second stage clarifier in to the

sludge drying beds and return sludge to the respective I & II stage aeration tank.

CLARIFIED EFFLUENT SUMP / FINAL TREATED EFFLUENT SUMP

The overflow from the final clarifier are collected in an sump from where it is

pumped into an Pressure Sand, and Activated Carbon filter for further

polishing of the treated effluent.

Design flow = 90 KLD

Retention time proposed -22 hours storage =80 cum

Proposed tank size = 8m x 4m x 3m TD - 2 No

E I A Report ADPL

80

Hence adequate.

FILTER FEED PUMPING:

Pumps - 2 nos. : One working and one standby.

Capacity : 15 cum / hr @ 30m Head

PRESSURE SAND FILTER & ACTIVATED CARBON FILTER : (ACF)

The treated effluent are pumped into the Pressure sand filter followed by

Activated carbon Filter for polishing the effluent and to reduce turbidity,

suspended solids, color.

Design Flow : 90 KLD

Considering 10 hrs operating of the filter

Flow/hr : 9 cum/hr

Considering the loading rate at 5 cum/sq. m/hr

Required area of the filter : 1.8 sq. m

Required diameter of the filter : 2 m diameter -1 No each

Hence adequate

LAND REQUIRED FOR USING TREATED EFFLUENT:

The daily generation of treated effluent = 90KLD

Out of the total 90KLD of treated effluent about 10KLD will be used for floor

Washings,

Fire fighting make up water

Balance 80KLD will be used for irrigation. .

Since the soil is sandy loam

Considering a loading rate @ 170 cum/Sq.M/day

E I A Report ADPL

81

Land required for using treated effluent =80x2.47/170= 1.16 acres.

Available vacant for utilizing treated effluent is 2.3 acres as against the

requirement of 1.16 acres hence adequate.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: (WASTE WATER TREATMENT &

DISPOSAL):

Effluent Treatment and Disposal:

This Adequacy report is prepared to check the adequacy of the existing ETP, and the

recommend the required up-gradation of CETP as necessary to meet the combined

existing and proposed effluent load due to the proposed expansion and for treating

the same and conserving the entire treated effluent on own land for irrigation

confirming to KSPCB on land discharge standards.

Further, it is to be noted that their will not be any additional Air Pollution Sources

envisaged due to the proposed expansion.

The entire effluent stream are classified into 4 streams, based on their organic

strength and BOD loading for source segregation and ease in treatment.

Stream-1:

Domestic effluent with a maximum flow of 19KLD is gravitated as an independent

stream in to Bar Screen chamber for physical separation of solids, followed by

equalization for flow balancing with pre-aeration, which will be further pumped in to


stage Extended Aeration Activated Sludge Process (EAASP).

Stream-2& Stream-3:

The stream-2 &3 effluents with a maximum flow of (16KLD +38KLD ) will be



and pH adjustment The neutralized effluent will be further pumped in to the

Anaerobic lagoon where it mixes with stream-4 effluent which is further treated in

E I A Report ADPL

82


stage EAASP. Where in it mixes with stream-1 effluent for further treatment.

Stream-4:

The Stream-4 effluents with a maximum flow of 17KLD will be gravitated as an

independent stream in to Bar Screen chamber for physical separation of solids, and

than after pH correction flows in to the existing Anaerobic lagoon where it mixes

with stream2 & stream3, and than the pre –treated stream-4 along with stream2 &3

effluent flows in to the existing aeration tank which shall be used as intermediate

equalization tank where it with the mixes with stream-1. The combined stream will

be further treated by II stage EAASP. After 2 stage biological treatment. The

combined treated effluent post filtration and chlorination will be used on own land

for gardening, floor wash,

The design details are presented in Section IV of this report. The project report is

enclosed separately along with this report. The layout plan of CETP is enclosed in

Annexure -2 of this report.

The sludge generated from the ETP will be used as manure for irrigation. The

quantity of solid waste it s collection, treatment and disposal are enclosed below.

The proposal is submitted to KSPCB for approval. The entire CETP work will be

completed in 5 months of time after getting the necessary approval from KSPCB

Annexure - 4

E I A Report ADPL

83

E I A Report ADPL

84

vii. Industrial Waste Management.

ANNEXURE – 4

Vii. Effluent and wash water generated

viii.

SL. Particulars Effluent water Wash water 1. Malt Spirit Plant 19,128 9,000 2. Jiggery Spirit Plant 4,000 500 3. Grape Spirit Plant 4,000 500 4. IML Bottling 2,000 5. Domestic 15,000 Total 27,128 27,000

Solid waste management.

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT:

Quantities of solid wastes before and after expansion and the mode of

disposal are detailed in Table given below

Details of Solid Waste Management

Sl No.

Description of waste

Existing Quantity

Proposed Quantity

Mode of Disposal

1 Broken bottles/glass

14.2 tonnes/month

0.12 Tonne/month

Sent to glass factory

2 Corrugated Paper waste

9.5 tonnes/month

0.015 tonnes/month

Sent to box manufactures for re-processing

3 Spent grain used barley malt

30.7 tonnes/month

200 tonnes/month

To be sold as animal feed for dairy farms

4 ETP sludge 5kgs/day 40kgs/day Will be disposed a manure on land for gardening

5 Waste oil 60 lts/month 10lts/month MS drums – to KSPCB authorized agencies.

6 Laminates --- 5.2Tonne/month Will be sold to recyclers

7 Aseptic Packs --- 1.24 Tonne/month

Will be sold to recyclers

8 PET Bottles --- .196 Tonnes/month

Will be sold to recyclers

9 Grape Musk --- 37.5 Tonnes/month

Composting and used as manure

E I A Report ADPL

85

X. Power Requirement & supply/source.

E I A Report ADPL

86

E I A Report ADPL

87

VIII. Rehabilitation ad Resettlement (R&R) Plan

i. Policy to be adopted (central/state ) in respect of the project affected persons

including home outsets, land outsets, and landless labourers (a brief outline to

be given)

Existing industry from more than 3 decades,there is no R & R issues,what ever

addition is well within our boundary.

IX. Project schedule & cost estimates

i. Likely date of start of construction and likely date of completion (time

schedule for the project to be given).

Shall begin with the issue of the Environmental clearance issued by the

department.

ii. Estimated project cost along with analysis in terms of economic viability of the

project.

The cost of the project will be 12 crores.

E I A Report ADPL

88

X. Analysis of proposal (Final Recommendations)

1. Financial and social benefits with special emphasis on the benefit to the local

people including tribal population, if any, in the area.

Employees are with us since the inception and are all provided with the best

of facilities the industry demands.

CONCLUSION

Internationally, the trend is towards discouraging artificial flavours and

encouraging natural products to the extent feasible. Survival of the IML

industry would therefore depend largely on the extent to which it is able

to adapt itself to the demands of modern consumers which alone would

enable it to successfully face completion from multinational operators in

the industry. Production of rum out of jiggery spirit is a step in this

direction.

Our position as an existing, well–established IML manufacturer,

Availability of capacity within our existing factory, the marketing set-up

That we have already created in several countries across the globe all this

Places us in a unique position to successfully develop and market newer

and newer, natural and genuine products. We therefore propose to

immediately commence production of jiggery-spirit as soon as

procedural requirements including grant of Excise License are complete

E I A Report ADPL

89

E I A Report ADPL

90

E I A Report ADPL

91

E I A Report ADPL

92

E I A Report ADPL

93

E I A Report ADPL

94

E I A Report ADPL

95

E I A Report ADPL

96

E I A Report ADPL

97

E I A Report ADPL

98

E I A Report ADPL

99

Date post:	14-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	dokhuong
View:	215 times
Download:	2 times

E I A ADPLReport -...

Documents