Eastwood Trust APPLICATION 030497B Petition Environmental Form

8/13/2019 Eastwood Trust APPLICATION 030497B Petition Environmental Form

1/64


2/64

Page 2 of 4

Coordination with Regional Water Quality Control Board

For change petitions only, you must request consultation with the Regional Date of RequestWater Quality Control Board regarding the potential effects of your proposedchange on water quality and other instream beneficial uses. (Cal. Code Regs.,tit. 23, 794.) In order to determine the appropriate office for consultation, see:http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterboards_map.shtml. Provide thedate you submitted your request for consultation here, then provide the followinginformation.

Will your project, during construction or operation, (1) generate waste orwastewater containing such things as sewage, industrial chemicals, metals, Yes Noor agricultural chemicals, or (2) cause erosion, turbidity or sedimentation?

Will a waste discharge permit be required for the project? Yes No

If necessary, provide additional information below:

Insert the attachment number here, if applicable:

Local Permits

For temporary transfers only, you must contact the board of supervisors for the Date of Contactcounty(ies) both for where you currently store or use water and where you proposeto transfer the water. (Wat. Code 1726.) Provide the date you submittedyour request for consultation here.

For change petitions only, you should contact your local planning or public works department and provide the

information below.

Person Contacted: Date of Contact:

Department: Phone Number:

County Zoning Designation:

Are any county permits required for your project? If yes, indicate type below. Yes No

Grading Permit Use Permit Watercourse Obstruction Permit

Change of Zoning General Plan Change Other (explain below)

If applicable, have you obtained any of the permits listed above? If yes, provide copies. Yes No



June 21, 2013

not applicable


3/64

Page 3 of 4

Federal and State Permits

Check any additional agencies that may require permits or other approvals for your project:

Regional Water Quality Control Board Department of Fish and Game

Dept of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams California Coastal Commission

State Reclamation Board U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Forest Service

Bureau of Land Management Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Natural Resources Conservation Service

Have you obtained any of the permits listed above? If yes, provide copies. Yes No

For each agency from which a permit is required, provide the following information:

Agency Permit Type Person(s) Contacted Contact Date Phone Number



Construction or Grading Activity

Does the project involve any construction or grading-related activity that has significantly Yes Noaltered or would significantly alter the bed, bank or riparian habitat of any stream or lake?




4/64


5/64


6/64

13868, although there will be some changes in the places where these diversions occur.The effects of these changes in points of diversion are described in the June 2013 WestYost Associates report, Groundwater and Surface Water Evaluation Report,Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition Project, a copy of which is included inAttachment 11.


7/64

Attachment 9

Change Petition Map

The following map is an 8 x 11-inch copy of the map that shows all of the requestedchanges in authorized points of diversion and places of use of License 13868A. The 22 x

34-inch original of this map is being filed with this petition.


8/64


9/64

Attachment 10

Photographs

The following photographs all were prepared from Google Earth aerial photos on June20, 2013.

The first page, titled OVERALL WELL EXHIBIT shows the locations of, andvegetation at, the existing and proposed points of diversion and most of the existing andproposed places of use.

The second and third pages, titled WELL NO. 2 EXHIBIT and WELL NO. 1EXHIBIT, show the vegetation at the existing points of diversion.

The following four pages, titled RANCHO CAADA WELL EXHIBIT, CYPRESSAND PEARCE WELLS EXHIBIT, SCHULTE WELL EXHIBIT, and BEGONIAAND BERWICK WELLS EXHIBIT, show the vegetation at the proposed new points of

diversion.


10/64

REDUCED


11/64


12/64


13/64


14/64


15/64


16/64


17/64

Attachment 11

West Yost Associates Report

See attached Report, dated June 2013: Groundwater and Surface Water EvaluationReport, Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition Project.


18/64

Groundwater and SurfaceWater Evaluation Report

Eastwood/Odello

Water Right Change

Petition Project

Macaulay Water Resources and

Barkiewicz, Kronick,

& Shanahan

June 2013

555-00-13-03


19/64


20/64

Table of Contents

i Groundwater and Surface Water Evaluation ReportJune2013 Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition ProjectN:\Clients\555-00-13-03 \WP\060713 tb5 R Odello GW Eval


21/64

iiGroundwater and Surface Water Evaluation ReportJune2013 Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition ProjectN:\Clients\555-00-13-03 \WP\060713 tb5 R Odello GW Eval


22/64

1-1 Groundwater and Surface Water Evaluation ReportJune2013 Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition ProjectN:\Clients\555-00-13-03 \WP\060713 tb5 R Odello GW Eval

CHAPTER 1

Introduction

REPORT ORGANIZATION1.1

PROJECT BACKGROUND1.2


23/64

Chapter 1


Table 1-1. Estimated Long-Term Mean Monthly Applied Water and Evapotranspiration

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August September

October

November

December

ANNUAL 124.0 100.0% 85.6 0.118 53

- -

STUDY OBJECTIVES1.3

WATER RESOURCES SETTING1.4


24/64

Chapter 1


1.4.1Study Area

1.4.2Rainfall

1.4.3Surface Water Hydrology


25/64

Chapter 1


1.4.4Groundwater Hydrology


26/64

Chapter 1


1.4.5Aquifer Properties

Table 1-2. Results of Aquifer Simulation Studies


27/64

1

68

San ClementeReservoir

Los PadresReservoir

White RockLake

CARMEL BAY

CARMELVALLEY

CarmelRiver

Chup

ines

Creek

TularcitosCreek

BlackR

ockCreek

CachaguaCreek

Carm

elRiver

SSIIEE

RRRRAA

DDEELL

SSAALLIINNAASS

SSAANNTTAA

LLUUCC

II

AA

RRAANN

GGEE

RM 0.0

RM 10.0

Last Saved: 6/19/2013 11:27:21 AM areimer; N:\Clients\555 Macaulay Water Resources\00-13-03 Odello Ranch GW Eval\GIS\Figures\Report Figures 20130619\Figure11_Watershed.mxd

Confidential: attorney-client and work product privileges.

Fresno

Modesto

BakersfieldAvil a Beach

San Francisco

Carmel Valley


28/64

PEARSE

CAADA #2

SCHULTE #2CYPRESS #2BERWICK #8

BERWICK #9

BEGONIA #2EASTWOOD/ODELLOWELL 2

1

68

Last Saved: 6/19/2013 12:31:16 PM areimer; N:\Clients\555 Macaulay Water Resources\00-13-03 Odello Ranch GW Eval\GIS\Figures\Report Figures 20130619\Figure12_CalAmWells.mxd



29/64


30/64

Highway 1BridgeGauge

Don JuanBridgeGauge

SleepyHollow

Weir Gauge

USGS CarmelRiver near

Carmel Gauge

USGS CarmelRiver at Roblesdel Rio Gauge

Carmel RiverLagoon Gauge

RM 15.0

RM 14.3

RM 12.5

RM 10.2RM 10.0

RM 9.0

RM 7.3

RM 6.5RM 5.0

RM

0.0

Last Saved: 6/19/2013 1:43:31 PM areimer; N:\Clients\555 Macaulay Water Resources\00-13-03 Odello Ranch GW Eval\GIS\Figures\Report Figures 20130619\Figure14_Streamgages.mxd


0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Oct-62

Oct-64

Oct-66

Oct-68

Oct-70

Oct-72

Oct-74

Oct-76

Oct-78

Oct-80

Oct-82

Oct-84

Oct-86

Oct-88

Oct-90

Oct-92

Oct-94

ManthlyAverageFlo

w,

cfs

Carmel River Monthly Average Flow Data, USGS Robles Del Ri

0

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

Oct-62

Oct-64

Oct-66

Oct-68

Oct-70

Oct-72

Oct-74

Oct-76

Oct-78

Oct-80

Oct-82

Oct-84

Oct-86

Oct-88

Oct-90

Oct-92

Oct-94

Oct-96

Oct-98

Oct-00

Oct-02

Oct-04

Oct-06

Oct-08

Oct-10

Manthly

AverageFlow,

cfs

Carmel River Monthly Average Flow Data, USGS Carmel Gauge, 19622012

0


31/64


32/64


CHAPTER 2

Methodology

DATA COMPILATION AND REVIEW2.1

EVALUATION OF GROUNDWATER LEVEL IMPACTS2.2


33/64

Chapter 2



34/64

Information Type Relevence to Study

Groundwater Production Data

Surface Water Hydrology

Table 2-1. Key Data and Reports Compi led and Reviewed for This Evalua

Reports

Groundwater Level Data


35/64

Well / River

Distance From

Pumping Well

(ft)

Aqu ifer

Thickness

(ft)

Hydraulic

Conductivity,

K (ft/d)

Transmissivity

(g/d ft)

Storativity,

S

Specific Yield,

Sy

Base

Pumping

Rate (GPM)

Base +

Ass ignment

Pumping

Rate (GPM)

Odello

Canada

Cypress

Pearse

Schulte

Begonia #2

Berwick#9

Berwick#8

Table 2-2. Model Input Parameters for Quantif ication of Groundwater Level Drawdown


36/64

Chapter 2Methodology

2-5 Groundwater and Surface Water Evaluation Report

June2013 Eastwood/Odello Water Right Change Petition ProjectN:\Clients\555-00-13-03 \WP\060713 tb5 R Odello GW Eval

Table 2-3. Proposed Eastwood/Odello Ass ignment on Munic ipal Demand Pattern

Month

Monthly Municipal

Demand Pattern(1)

Monthly Diversion ofProposed Eastwood/Odello

Assignment (AF)

Well Extraction Rate forDiversion of Proposed

Assignment (GPM)

January 3.3% 5.5 40February 3.4% 5.0 40March 4.7% 5.7 42April 7.5% 6.4 48May 11.0% 8.0 59June 12.9% 8.6 65July 12.9% 9.2 67August 12.6% 9.2 67September 11.1% 8.4 63October 9.8% 7.8 57November 6.5% 6.1 46December 4.4% 5.6 41ANNUAL 100.0% 85.6 53(1) MPWMD, 2013. Cal-Am Main System monthly demand distribution based on reported production for the 10-year period

from Water Year 1998 to 2007.

SOURCE: Cal-Am monthly production records submitted to MPWMD.

EVALUATION OF STREAM FLOW IMPACTS2.3

As noted above, Eastwood/Odello water right License 13868 has historically been utilized for

irrigation purposes. As a result, a portion of the pumped water re-enters the groundwater basinthrough infiltration from irrigation return flows, while the rest of the pumped water is consumed

through evapotranspiration (ET). The amounts of consumptive use were quantified by Davids

Engineering in 2013 and are summarized by month in Table 1-1. As indicated in Table 1-1, the

estimated average annual consumptive use is 85.6 acre-feet, which equates to an annual averageflow rate of 0.118 cfs.

For this analysis, it is assumed that, for the Project, the total annual additional pumping of the

seven Cal-Am wells that will be used for the Project will equal the annual ET rate in Table 1-1.All of these wells pump from either aquifer zone AS3 or aquifer zone AS4. It is also assumedthat the pumping of water for the Project through these Cal-Am wells will cause instantaneous,

one-to-one flow reductions in the surface water flows in the reach of the Carmel River between

the point of the river that is adjacent to the well point and the point on the river that is adjacent to

the existing Eastwood/Odello well. The actual impacts of this change in pumping location onriver flows are likely to be delayed, and are likely to be less than one-to-one, due to the

attenuating effects of withdrawing water from the aquifer rather than directly from the river. The


37/64

Chapter 2



38/64


CHAPTER 3

Results

RESULTS OF GROUNDWATER DRAWDOWN ANALYSIS3.1

3.1.1Well Maps and Groundwater Pumping Assessment


39/64


40/64

Pumping Well

Observation

Point

Distance From

Pumping Well (ft)

Base Case

Pumping Rate

(GPM)

Drawdown After

30 days of

Pumping (ft)

Drawdown After

100 days of

Pumping (ft)

Base + Assignment

Pumping Pumping

Rate (GPM)

Drawdown After

30 days of

Pumping (ft)

Drawdown After

100 days of

Pumping (ft)

D

Odello

Canada

Cypress

Pearse

Schulte

Begonia #2

Berwick#9

Berwick#8

Table 3-1. Summary of Predicted Groundw ater Level Declines Resulting fro m Historic al Cal-Am Pumping and Eastwood


41/64

EASTWOOD/ODELLO

WELL 2

#170#171

#188

#194

#196

#200

#202

310

0 500250

Scale in Feet

FIGURE 3-1Eastwood/Odello Water Right

Change Petition Project

PRIVATE PUMPING 2012 AND

WELL DISTANCES FROMEASTWOOD/ODELLO WELL 2

LEGEND

Private Production Well

Distance to River (feet)

Carmel River

Private Pumping

(acre-feet per y ear)

< 0.01

0.01 - 1.0

1.0 - 5.0

5.0 - 10

10 - 25

> 25


NOTE:1. Numbers assigned to the private pumping zones are not real well names or IDs. They are numbers provided and used by West YostAssociates in order to identify the different private pumping areas. Those areas with more than one well were assigned one identifyingnumber.2. Private pumping zones with pumping totals were obtained from Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (MPWMD) (March,

2013).3. Private production well locations were calculated based on the centroids of each pumping zone with a value greater than 0 acre-feet peryear. These do not depict actual well locations.4. Eastwood/Odello Well 2 falls in the private pumping zone labeled as #171.


42/64

West ofHWY 1

SectorI-II

SectorIV-V

East of Camp

Stefani

Sector

II-III

Sector

V-VI

SectorVII-VIII

SectorIII-IV

Sector

XI-XII

SectorVI-VII

SectorVIII-IX

SectorXII-XIII

Sector

XIII-XIV

SectorX-XI

Sector

IX-X

Last Saved: 6/19/2013 1:01:55 PM areimer; N:\Clients\555 Macaulay Water Resources\00-13-03 Odello Ranch GW Eval\GIS\Figures\Report Figures 20130619\Figure32_AquiferStorageZones.mxd



43/64

Chapter 3



44/64

Chapter 3


RESULTS OF SURFACE WATER STREAM FLOW ANALYSIS3.2


45/64

Chapter 3


Table 3-2. Summary of Carmel River Flow Ranges by Month, Carmel Gauge, 19622012

Year Round 9,050 47 16 37 47 14 39


46/64


47/64


48/64


49/64

Chapter 4


SURFACE WATER IMPACTS4.2


50/64


CHAPTER 5

References


51/64

APPENDIX A


52/64

Appe

Eastwood/Odello Water R

CARMEL VALLEY AQ


53/64

APPENDIX B


54/64

RUBIN

CVR01

CVR08

CVR05

WELL E

SERO#4

BROOKDALE

COYOTE US

BORONDA RD

REIMERS #1

CV HIGH #1

VIAMALLORCA

VALLEYGREENS

SCHULTE ROAD

CENTER STREET

CAWD_ DEWATER

CAWD RIO NORTHCAWD RIO ROAD TEST

WILLIAMS SOUTH

WILLIAMS NORTH

STPARKS BEACH-W-SSTPARKS BEACH-E-DSTPARKS BEACH-C-I

MIDVALLEY

MONITOR

RC EASTMONITOR

RC WEST MONITOR

CLARK WELLSFARGO

STPARKS NRCAWD-DEEPSTPARKS NRCAWD-INTSTPARKS NRCAWD-SH

STPARKS WETLANDS-W-DSTPARKS WETLANDS-E-SSTPARKS WETLANDS-C

WETLANDPIEZOMETER 3

KAMISKEMONITOR

(A1)

1

68

Last Saved: 6/19/2013 1:07:58 PM areimer; N:\Clients\555 Macaulay Water Resources\00-13-03 Odello Ranch GW Eval\GIS\Figures\Report Figures 20130619\FigureB1_MPWMDWells.mxd



55/64


56/64


57/64


58/64


59/64


60/64


61/64


62/64


63/64


64/64

Date post:	04-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	l-a-paterson
View:	215 times
Download:	0 times

Eastwood Trust APPLICATION 030497B Petition Environmental Form

Documents