+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Education Scholarship & Innovation Symposium | 2016

Education Scholarship & Innovation Symposium | 2016

Date post: 14-Jul-2016
Category:
Upload: mike-pascoe
View: 56 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
TITLE: Healthcare Profession Student Internet Usage in the Gross Anatomy Lab SettingAUTHOR:Pascoe MAPhysical Therapy Program, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USAModern Human Anatomy Program, Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, [email protected]: Personal computer use for educational purposes by students of healthcare professions has become ubiquitous. Although the effect of computer-based dissection instructions has been studied (Reeves et al. 2004), there is a paucity of information regarding student usage of the vast amount of information available on the internet. Although current students have favorable attitudes toward accessing anatomical information online (Barry et al. 2015), internet usage patterns have not yet been investigated specifically in the dissection lab setting.OBJECTIVE: To describe the browsing characteristics of healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy setting.METHODS:Files containing the default web browser history were retrieved from 24 iMac computers located in the gross anatomy lab. Computers were used during gross anatomy courses for PT, PA, MD, DDS, MHA and AA students. Custom ruby code was written to parse the history files into comma separated value (CSV) files containing the web address visited, the date and time, and the number of visits to that address. Each web address was categorized and descriptive statistics calculated to examine usage patterns by the students. These procedures were deemed exempt from human subjects research by the COMIRB (protocol# 15-0662).RESULTS: The browser history for 24 computers was analyzed across the time frame of June 2013 to January 2015. In those ~600 days, students accumulated a total of 100,857 website visits. The number of unique addresses visited per computer was on average 1,524 945 and varied widely between computers (12 to 3,407). Most often, students used the web browser to use the default search engine (Google) for anatomy (22,146 visits; 22.0% of all visits) and non-anatomy related (20,755 visits; 20.6% of all visits) information. Students also used the web browser to access entertainment (music streaming, YouTube, social media = 16,505 visits; 16.4% of all visits) and various productivity related services (cloud hosting, email, Canvas, university webpages = 16,042 visits; 15.9% of all visits). DISCUSSION: These preliminary analyses demonstrate a large volume of of internet usage by healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy lab. A wide diversity of anatomy- and non-anatomy related websites were visited. Future analyses will include examination of when in relation to class time students accessed the information (e.g., in preparation for or during class), how usage changes over time, and what anatomical structures were most commonly searched for.
1
Healthcare Profession Student Internet Usage in the Gross Anatomy Lab Setting 1 Physical Therapy Program, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 2 Modern Human Anatomy Program, Dept of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO #ESIS2016 Background Objective Methods Results Conclusions Personal computer use for educational purposes by students of healthcare professions has become ubiquitous. Although the effect of computer-based dissection instructions has been studied (Reeves et al. 2004), there is a paucity of information regarding student usage of the vast amount of anatomical information available on the internet. Although today’s students have favourable attitudes toward accessing anatomical information online (Barry et al. 2015), internet usage patterns have not yet been investigated specifically in the gross anatomy lab setting. To describe the browsing characteristics of healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy setting. These preliminary analyses demonstrate a large volume of internet usage by healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy lab. A wide diversity of anatomy- and non-anatomy related websites were visited. These findings suggest that students primarily use internet access to seek information about specific structures they are dissecting in cadaver lab. Future analyses will include examination of when in relation to class time students accessed the information (e.g., in preparation for or during class), how usage changes over time, and what anatomical structures were most commonly searched for. In addition, future analysis should examine the accuracy of information students are viewing to determine if students need guidance on appraising anatomical information they find on the internet. Acknowledgements Thanks to Kalie Petefish for assisting with webpage categorization and to Scott and Jomana Malone for writing the custom ruby code. References Mike Pascoe, PhD 1, 2 Figure 2. Photograph depicting the location of the iMac computer adjacent to a dissection table in the gross anatomy lab. History .PLIST x 24 .rb .CSV Figure 1. Procedures for obtaining and analyzing web browser history. Computers were used during gross anatomy courses for PT, PA, MD, DDS, MHA and AA students. These procedures were deemed exempt from human subjects research by the COMIRB (protocol# 15-0662). Barry, DS et al. (2016). Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Edu, 9: 90-96. Reeves, RE et al. (2004). Improved dissection efficiency in the human gross anatomy laboratory by the integration of computers and modern technology. Clin Anat, 17: 337–344. Figure 3. Categorical breakdown of the 100,857 webpages visited on the 24 iMacs from June 2013 to January 2015 (~600 days). Primary categories given in bold with examples listed below. Google search, anatomy related Left crus of diaphragm Transversus thoracis Why gallbladder green Spinal cord vessels Google search, non-anatomy related Judge Judy net worth Male Disney scrubs Sean Connery Neurosurgeon salary Other Quizlet flashcards Craigslist Amazon PubMed Productivity services Cloud hosting Email Canvas Univ webpages Entertainment services Music streaming YouTube Social media 25.1% 15.9% 16.4% 20.6% 22.0% URL Date/Time # Visits USB Results Per iMac Per Day ( N = 24) ( N = 600) Webpage visits 100,857 4,202 ± 2,483 168 (19 - 7,968) Unique webpages 36,587 1,524 ± 945 61 (12 - 3,407) Total Table 1. Summary of webpage visits and unique webpages analyzed, per iMac and per day (June 2013 - January 2015). Per iMac are mean ± standard deviation (minimum to maximum values). Table 2. Subcategorization of a sample of 1,000 (total = 22,146) anatomy-related Google search terms. Subcategory Example search term Count Percent of sample Structure Conus medularis 750 75.0% Region Blood supply to bladder 144 14.4% Clinical concept Abdominal aorta bypass graft material 44 4.4% Resource Bergman atlas anatomy variation 25 2.5% Concept Circle of Willis 23 2.3% Terminology Arcuate definition 14 1.4%
Transcript

Healthcare Profession Student Internet Usage in the Gross Anatomy Lab Setting

1Physical Therapy Program, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO2Modern Human Anatomy Program, Dept of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO

#ESIS2016

Background

Objective

Methods

Results ConclusionsPersonal computer use for educational purposes by students of healthcare professions has become ubiquitous. Although the effect of computer-based dissection instructions has been studied (Reeves et al. 2004), there is a paucity of information regarding student usage of the vast amount of anatomical information available on the internet. Although today’s students have favourable attitudes toward accessing anatomical information online (Barry et al. 2015), internet usage patterns have not yet been investigated specifically in the gross anatomy lab setting.

To describe the browsing characteristics of healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy setting.

These preliminary analyses demonstrate a large volume of internet usage by healthcare profession students in the gross anatomy lab. A wide diversity of anatomy- and non-anatomy related websites were visited.

These findings suggest that students primarily use internet access to seek information about specific structures they are dissecting in cadaver lab.

Future analyses will include examination of when in relation to class time students accessed the information (e.g., in preparation for or during class), how usage changes over time, and what anatomical structures were most commonly searched for.

In addition, future analysis should examine the accuracy of information students are viewing to determine if students need guidance on appraising anatomical information they find on the internet.

AcknowledgementsThanks to Kalie Petefish for assisting with webpage categorization and to Scott and Jomana Malone for writing the custom ruby code.

References

Mike Pascoe, PhD1, 2

Figure 2. Photograph depicting the location of the iMac computer adjacent to a dissection table in the gross anatomy lab.

History.PLIST

x 24.rb

.CSV

Figure 1. Procedures for obtaining and analyzing web browser history. Computers were used during gross anatomy courses for PT, PA, MD, DDS, MHA and AA students. These procedures were deemed exempt from human subjects research by the COMIRB (protocol# 15-0662).

Barry, DS et al. (2016). Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Edu, 9: 90-96.

Reeves, RE et al. (2004). Improved dissection efficiency in the human gross anatomy laboratory by the integration of computers and modern technology. Clin Anat, 17: 337–344.

Figure 3. Categorical breakdown of the 100,857 webpages visited on the 24 iMacs from June 2013 to January 2015 (~600 days). Primary categories given in bold with examples listed below.

Google search,anatomy relatedLeft crus of diaphragmTransversus thoracisWhy gallbladder greenSpinal cord vessels

Google search,non-anatomy relatedJudge Judy net worthMale Disney scrubsSean ConneryNeurosurgeon salary

OtherQuizlet flashcards

CraigslistAmazonPubMed

Productivityservices

Cloud hostingEmail

CanvasUniv webpages

Entertainmentservices

Music streamingYouTube

Social media

25.1%

15.9%

16.4%

20.6%

22.0%

URL Date/Time # Visits

USB

Results

Per iMac Per Day(N = 24) (N = 600)

Webpage visits 100,857 4,202 ± 2,483 168(19 - 7,968)

Unique webpages 36,587 1,524 ± 945 61(12 - 3,407)

Total

Table 1. Summary of webpage visits and unique webpages analyzed, per iMac and per day (June 2013 - January 2015). Per iMac are mean ± standard deviation (minimum to maximum values).

Table 2. Subcategorization of a sample of 1,000 (total = 22,146) anatomy-related Google search terms.

Subcategory Example search term Count Percent of sample

Structure Conus medularis 750 75.0%Region Blood supply to bladder 144 14.4%Clinical concept Abdominal aorta bypass graft material 44 4.4%Resource Bergman atlas anatomy variation 25 2.5%Concept Circle of Willis 23 2.3%Terminology Arcuate definition 14 1.4%

Recommended