+ All Categories
Home > Documents > EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: eben
View: 46 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication. Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 2 Jan. 15 th , 2014. Large-scale small-scale propagation. Models are Specialized. Refraction, diffraction and scattering Different scales Large scale (averaged over meters) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
42
EE 6332, Spring, 2017 Wireless Telecommunication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 2 Jan. 23 rd , 2017
Transcript
Page 1: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

EE 6332, Spring, 2017

Wireless Telecommunication

Zhu Han

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering

Class 2

Jan. 23rd, 2017

                                                           

Page 2: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Large-scale small-scale propagationLarge-scale small-scale propagation

Page 3: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Models are SpecializedModels are Specialized

Refraction, diffraction and scattering

Different scales– Large scale (averaged over meters)

– Small scale (order of wavelength)

Different environmental characteristics– Outdoor, indoor, land, sea, space, etc.

Different application areas– macrocell (2km), microcell(500m), picocell

Chapter 2

Some figures in the slides from Rappaport book

Page 4: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Radio Propagation MechanismsRadio Propagation Mechanisms Refraction

– Conductors & Dielectric materials (refraction)– Propagation wave impinges on an object which is large as compared to

wavelength

- e.g., the surface of the Earth, buildings, walls, etc. Diffraction

– Fresnel zones– Radio path between transmitter and receiver obstructed by surface with

sharp irregular edges– Waves bend around the obstacle, even when LOS (line of sight) does not

exist Scattering

– Objects smaller than the wavelength of the propagation wave

- e.g. foliage, street signs, lamp posts– “Clutter” is small relative to wavelength

Page 5: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

RefractionRefraction

Perfect conductors reflect with no attenuation– Like light to the mirror

Dielectrics reflect a fraction of incident energy– “Grazing angles” reflect max*

– Steep angles transmit max*

– Like light to the water

Reflection induces 180 phase shift– Why? See yourself in the mirror

r

t

Page 6: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Classical 2-ray ground bounce modelClassical 2-ray ground bounce model

One line of sight and one ground bound

Page 7: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Method of imageMethod of image

Page 8: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Vector addition of 2 raysVector addition of 2 rays

Page 9: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Simplified modelSimplified model Far field simplified model

Example 2.2 4

22

d

hhGGPP rtrttr

Page 10: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

DiffractionDiffraction

Diffraction occurs when waves hit the edge of an obstacle– “Secondary” waves propagated into the shadowed region

– Water wave example

– Diffraction is caused by the propagation of secondary wavelets into a shadowed region.

– Excess path length results in a phase shift

– The field strength of a diffracted wave in the shadowed region is the vector sum of the electric field components of all the secondary wavelets in the space around the obstacle.

– Huygen’s principle: all points on a wavefront can be considered as point sources for the production of secondary wavelets, and that these wavelets combine to produce a new wavefront in the direction of propagation.

Page 11: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Diffraction geometryDiffraction geometry

Fresnel-Kirchoff distraction parameters,

Page 12: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Fresnel ScreensFresnel Screens

Fresnel zones relate phase shifts to the positions of obstacles

A rule of thumb used for line-of-sight microwave links 55% of the first Fresnel zone is kept clear.

Page 13: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Fresnel ZonesFresnel Zones

Bounded by elliptical loci of constant delay

Alternate zones differ in phase by 180– Line of sight (LOS) corresponds to 1st zone

– If LOS is partially blocked, 2nd zone can destructively interfere (diffraction loss)

How much power is propagated

this way?– 1st FZ: 5 to 25 dB below

free space prop.

Obstruction of Fresnel Zones 1st 2nd

0-10-20-30-40-50-60

0o

90

180o

dB

Tip of Shadow

Obstruction

LOS

Page 14: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Knife-edge diffraction lossKnife-edge diffraction loss

Gain

Page 15: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

ScatteringScattering

Rough surfaces– Lamp posts and trees, scatter all directions

– Critical height for bumps is f(,incident angle),

– Smooth if its minimum to maximum protuberance h is less than critical height.

– Scattering loss factor modeled with Gaussian distribution,

Nearby metal objects (street signs, etc.)– Usually modeled statistically

Large distant objects– Analytical model: Radar Cross Section (RCS)

– Bistatic radar equation,

Page 16: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Impulse Response Model of a Time Variant Impulse Response Model of a Time Variant Multipath ChannelMultipath Channel

Page 17: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

TransitionTransition Stochastic large scale models:

– Log-distance path loss model

– log-normal shadowing

Outdoor propagation models

Indoor propagation models

Page 18: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Three scales of path modelThree scales of path model Figure 2.1

Page 19: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Propagation ModelsPropagation Models

Large scale models predict behavior averaged over distances >> – Function of distance & significant environmental features, roughly

frequency independent– Breaks down as distance decreases– Useful for modeling the range of a radio system and rough capacity

planning, – Experimental rather than the theoretical for previous three models– Path loss models, Outdoor models, Indoor models

Small scale (fading) models describe signal variability on a scale of – Multipath effects (phase cancellation) dominate, path attenuation

considered constant– Frequency and bandwidth dependent – Focus is on modeling “Fading”: rapid change in signal over a short

distance or length of time.

Page 20: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Free space propagation modelFree space propagation model Assumes far-field (Fraunhofer region)

– d >> D and d >> , where D is the largest linear dimension of antenna is the carrier wavelength

No interference, no obstructions Effective isotropic radiated power Effective radiated power Path loss Fraunhofer region/far field In log scale Equation (2.9) Example 2.1

dBd

ddPLdPL

00 )()(

Page 21: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Free Space Path LossFree Space Path Loss

Path Loss is a measure of attenuation based only on the distance to the transmitter

Free space model only valid in far-field; – Path loss models typically define a “close-in” point d0 and

reference other points from there:

Log-distance generalizes path loss to account for other environmental factors– Choose a d0 in the far field.

– Measure PL(d0) or calculate Free Space Path Loss.– Take measurements and derive empirically.

2

00 )()(

d

ddPdP rr

dB

dBr d

ddPLdPdPL

00 2)()]([)(

dBd

ddPLdPL

00 )()(

Page 22: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Typical large-scale path lossTypical large-scale path loss

Page 23: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Log-Normal Shadowing ModelLog-Normal Shadowing Model

Shadowing occurs when objects block LOS between transmitter and receiver

A simple statistical model can account for unpredictable “shadowing” – PL(d)(dB)=PL(d)+X0,

– Add a 0-mean Gaussian RV to Log-Distance PL

– Variance is usually from 3 to 12.

– Reason for Gaussian

Page 24: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Measured large-scale path lossMeasured large-scale path loss

Determine n and by mean and variance

Basic of Gaussian

Distribution

Example 2.3

Example 2.4

Page 25: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Okumura ModelOkumura Model It is one of the most widely used models for signal prediction in urban areas,

and it is applicable for frequencies in the range 150 MHz to 1920 MHz

Based totally on measurements (not analytical calculations)

Applicable in the range: 150MHz to ~ 2000MHz, 1km to 100km T-R separation, Antenna heights of 30m to 100m

Page 26: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Okumura ModelOkumura Model The major disadvantage with the model is its low response to rapid changes

in terrain, therefore the model is fairly good in urban areas, but not as good in rural areas.

Common standard deviations between predicted and measured path loss values are around 10 to 14 dB.

G(hre):m30m1000

200log20)(

te

tete h

hhG

m33

log10)(

re

rere h

hhG

m3m103

log20)(

re

rere h

hhG

Page 27: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Okumura and Hata’s modelOkumura and Hata’s model

Page 28: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Hata ModelHata Model Empirical formulation of the graphical data in the Okamura model.

Valid 150MHz to 1500MHz, Used for cellular systems The following classification was used by Hata:

■Urban area

■Suburban area

■Open area

EdBALdB logCdBALdB logDdBALdB log

bhfA 82.13log16.2655.69

bhB log55.69.44

94.40log33.18)28/log(78.4 2 ffD

4.5))28/(log(2 2 fC

MHzfhE m 300 cities, largefor 97.4))75.11(log(2.3 2

MHzfhE m 300 cities, largefor 1.1))54.1(log(29.8 2

cities small tomediumfor )8.0log56.1()7.0log11.1( fhfE m

Page 29: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

PCS Extension of Hata ModelPCS Extension of Hata Model COST-231 Hata Model, European standard

Higher frequencies: up to 2GHz

Smaller cell sizes

Lower antenna heights

GEdBFLdB log

bhfF log82.13log9.333.46 f >1500MHz

0

3G

Metropolitan centersMedium sized city and suburban areas

Page 30: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Indoor Propagation ModelsIndoor Propagation Models The distances covered are much smaller

The variability of the environment is much greater

Key variables: layout of the building, construction materials, building type, where the antenna mounted, …etc.

In general, indoor channels may be classified either as LOS or OBS with varying degree of clutter

The losses between floors of a building are determined by the external dimensions and materials of the building, as well as the type of construction used to create the floors and the external surroundings.

Floor attenuation factor (FAF)

Page 31: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Partition losses between floorsPartition losses between floors

Page 32: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Partition losses between floorsPartition losses between floors

Page 33: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Log-distance Path Loss ModelLog-distance Path Loss Model The exponent n

depends on the surroundings and building type– X is the variable

in dB having a standard deviation .

PL d PL d n d d X( ) ( ) log( / ) 0 010

Page 34: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Ericsson Multiple Breakpoint ModelEricsson Multiple Breakpoint Model

Page 35: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Attenuation Factor ModelAttenuation Factor Model FAF represents a floor attenuation factor for a specified number

of building floors.

PAF represents the partition attenuation factor for a specific obstruction encountered by a ray drawn between the transmitter and receiver in 3-D

is the attenuation constant for the channel with units of dB per meter.

PL d PL d n d d FAFSF( ) ( ) log( / ) 0 010

PL d PL d n d dMF( ) ( ) log( / ) 0 010

PL d PL d d d d FAF( ) ( ) log( / ) 0 010

PAF

PAF

PAF

Page 36: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Measured indoor path lossMeasured indoor path loss

Page 37: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Measured indoor path lossMeasured indoor path loss

Page 38: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Measured indoor path lossMeasured indoor path loss

Page 39: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Signal Penetration into BuildingsSignal Penetration into Buildings RF penetration has been found to be a function of frequency as

well as height within the building. Signal strength received inside a building increases with height, and penetration loss decreases with increasing frequency.

Walker’s work shows that building penetration loss decrease at a rate of 1.9 dB per floor from the ground level up to the 15th floor and then began increasing above the 15th floor. The increase in penetration loss at higher floors was attributed to shadowing effects of adjacent buildings.

Some devices to conduct the signals into the buildings

Page 40: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Ray Tracing and Site Specific ModelingRay Tracing and Site Specific Modeling

Site specific propagation model and graphical information system. Ray tracing. Deterministic model.

Data base for buildings, trees, etc.

SitePlanner

Page 41: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

Cell Coverage AreaCell Coverage Area

Example 2.6 and 2.7

Page 42: EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Telecommunication

                                                           

HomeworkHomework

HW 1: 2.1, 2.4, 2.11, 2.13, 2.14, 2.18, 2.24

Due 2/8/17


Recommended