Effect of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement on Asphalt Mix Performance

8/10/2019 Effect of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement on Asphalt Mix Performance

1/13

IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE)

e-ISSN: 2278-0661,p-ISSN: 2278-8727, Volume 16, Issue 6, Ver. VI (Nov Dec. 2014), PP 55-67www.iosrjournals.org

www.iosrjournals.org 55 | Page

Effect of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement on Asphalt Mix

Performance

Ahmed Mohamady, Ph.D.; Ashraf Elshahat, Ph.D.; Mahmoud Fathy Abd-

Elmaksoud, Ph.D.; ENG Mohamed Hoseny AbdallahAssistant Professor,Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University

Lecturer, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig UniversityLecturer, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University

Civil engineer at General Authority for Roads, Bridges and Land Transportation (GRBLT)

Abstract: Throughout history, the earth`s resources have been exploited without considering their eventuallimitations. At present, one of the key challenges is to concentrate on saving natural resources for future

generations while bringing industrial activities into a more stable long-term balance between environmental

preservation and costs. The main purpose of this study aims to investigate the use of recycled aggregatepavement (RAP) materials in highway and to determine the optimum reclaimed percent. To achieve the study

objective, a comprehensive experimental program was designed and conducted. After choosing the studymaterials, qualification tests were conducted on the study materials. Marshall test was conducted on six asphaltmixtures with different percentages of reclaimed materials. Asphalt concrete specimens were then prepared at

optimum asphalt content resulted in Marshall test to be investigated through indirect tensile strength test andloss of stability test. The six asphalt mixtures contain different percentages of RAP (i.e.0%, 10%, 20%, 25%30% and 40%). Analyzing the study results, it can be concluded that a percent of RAP may be 30% to ensure

superior field performance after construction. Finally, the study recommended to conduct a large scaleexperiment to take into consideration more cases of mixing components and conditions.

Keywords: Recycling materialIndirect tensile strength Loss of stability Batch plant Fatigue lifeCost

analysis

I.

Introduction And BackgroundRecycling is only one of several bituminous pavement rehabilitation alternatives. The other

alternatives are overlaying and reconstruction. The growing demand for materials to rehabilitate the highway

infrastructure and the increasing need of sustainable and environment friendly alternatives have made thedemand for recycling materials in pavements increase substantially. The most frequent application of recyclingmaterials in pavements is the reuse of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP). RAP is any removed or reprocessed

pavement material that contains asphalt and aggregates. The biggest source of RAP is rehabilitation of existingasphalt pavement by milling or full-depth removal. RAP can be combined with virgin aggregates, new binderand/or recycling agents to produce a recycled hot mix, which is the most frequent use of RAP [1]. Some of the

advantages associated with pavement recycling are less user delay, conversation of energy, preservation ofenvironment lower cost of construction and conservation of aggregate and binder [2]. Recycling of asphalt

pavement is not yet popular in developed countries. On the other hand, in advanced countries, bituminousmaterials are the most recycled materials in construction industry. For example, in USA, about 33 million tonsof reclaimed asphalt pavements are used per year for recycling purposes which is about 80% of the total amountof reclaimed asphalt pavements collected from old bituminous pavements [3]. Also, in the year 1995, 20 million

tons of recycled hot mix was produced in Japan, which represent 30% of the total hot mix production [4]. It is ofa great importance to state that the reclaimed asphalt mix is a deteriorated bituminous mix that contains agedasphalt and aggregate. Hence, its performance might be poorer when compared to a fresh mix. Thus, the process

of bituminous recycling involves mixing of the recycled asphalt mix with fresh mix by certain proportions [5].Historically, pavement resurfacing or replacement has been a major budget item for highway agencies.

Beginning with the surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, highway agencies have dedicated more andmore funds to the restoration and rehabilitation of the American highway network. A most promising approachthat has evolved in the recent years has been that of the roadway recovery concept or recycling. This approach

involves the reuse of existing roadway materials in the reconstruction of a pavement to the structural designrequired for future traffic needs [6].

Based on the process adopted in recycling the bituminous mixtures, it can be broadly classified ascentral plant recycling and in-situ recycling. If the recycled asphalt plant RAP is modified at a plant, away from

construction site then the process is known as central plant recycling. Another way of classification could be


2/13

Effect Of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement On Asphalt Mix Performance


based on the depth of the old pavement removed [7]. If the top layers of pavement fail, then the upper layers areremoved and laid again. This process is known as surface recycling.

The latest major survey with state agencies reports a 33% reuse of RAP in hot mix asphalt (HMA)production [8]. Since then this number is likely to have increased with the effort by highway agenciespromoting RAP use, as well as advancements in pavement recycling technology [3]. In hot in-plant recycling,

the recovered material is transported to a plant, where it is mixed with required quantity of virgin aggregates andasphalt binder and /or recycling agents. The mixing is performed at a high temperature, thus named hot in-plantrecycling. RAP can be either obtained by milling or crushing the existing pavement. "Successfully-completedprojects across the world have shown both cost effectiveness and quality of Pavement produced by this time-tested process .RAPs and asphaltic

cements are broken down to their original state and reused to produce highquality

asphaltic concrete, the performance of which has been proven to equal that of

conventional mixes"[9].

Hot in-plant recycling can be used to correct the gradation and mix properties of thedeteriorated pavements. Itcan be also used to correct or maintain the horizontal or

vertical geometries of the pavement. Hot in-plantrecycling advantages include

It can be done repeatedly with the same materials

It needs very little modifications in the existing HMA equipment and plants

It eliminates disposal and pollute on problems

Several researches have been done to evaluate properties and performance of mixes with RAP in thelaboratory and are documented in the literature [3]. When designed properly, RAP mixes have demonstrated, inthe laboratory, quality comparable to virgin HMAs. However, despite all the information available, obstacles

still exist to make RAP mix more frequently used in pavement engineering. The major difficulty is the beliefthat recycled materials are inferior in quality to virgin materials [8]. Most of this is based on judgment instead ofengineered performance evaluations. Assumptions such as RAP high variability, poor properties of binder in theRAP mix, and inferior long term performance (i.e., cracking and durability) are usually associated with RAP in

hot mix asphalt.

II. Problem Statement And Study MotivationDespite of the increasing scope of the road network, this network strongly needs various

types of maintenance in order to preserve the efficiency of the network to accommodate the volume of traffic

safely.In spite of the steady rise of prices of bitumen and the acute shortage of good aggregates that is

necessary for a production of asphalt concrete. All of this has attracted the attention to the search for new meansof maintenance that is less expensive and environmentally friendly. Several modern methods of roadmaintenance appeared by recycling way. Agencies can be achieving this by reusing the old asphalt mixes again

after grinding in different proportions in the new mix. This is done through designing a laboratory programinclude the asphalt mixes containing proportions of the old mixes and the other complementary asphalt mixes inordinary asphalt. This research would also assess the economic terms of using RAP in hot mix asphalt.

III. Objectives Of StudyThe main objectives of this study are to:-

Investigate the use of RAP in highway construction and to determine the optimum RAP percent,

Study the aging effect on RAP hot mix asphalt, and

Modify the batch plant mix to be able to produce RAP hot mix asphalt.

IV. Materials And Expermintal Testing ProgramTo achieve the main objectives of this study, an experimental program was designed. Figure (1) shows

the steps of this experimental program. The first step is collecting the study materials. These materials are thevirgin aggregate and the recycled materials as well as asphalt binder. One source of asphalt was used in this

study. This was Suez asphalt cement with 60/70 penetration grade and 1.02 specific gravity. The recycledmaterials were collected from Zagazig Bilbis highway. The virgin aggregate was taken from Suez quarries.After that, qualifications tests were conducted on the collected materials. After checking material acceptance

several mix samples were prepared in groups. Each group was prepared with some Specified percent of recycledmaterial. Then six mixes (from M1 to M6) were prepared with recycled percent of 0%, 10%, 20%, 25%, 30%

and 40%. The complementary percent of the previous mixes are virgin aggregate. Marshall test were conductedon all the investigated specimens to obtain the optimum asphalt content for each mix in additions to different

mix properties. These properties include stability, unit weight, air voids, voids in mineral aggregate and mixflow. As shown in figure (1), the next step is conducting some special tests to evaluate the mix behavior under


3/13



different loading conditions. These tests include two important tests. The first test is the indirect tensile test(ITT) to be used as an indicator of pavement ability to resist cracking. The second test is the loss of stability to

measure the ability of the asphalt pavement to resist Water ImmersionThe selected mix gradation is (4-C) as specified by the general specifications for Egypt.

4.1 Laboratory TestsTwo types of laboratory tests were applied. The first type is the qualification tests. It is conducted to identify

the different properties of materials used in the study. While the second type is the main tests used to measurethe intended properties of the investigated mixtures such as Marshall test, indirect tensile test and loss ofstability test. Tables from (1) and (8) show qualification tests of aggregate, asphalt respectively, extraction testand los Anglos abrasion test . The qualification tests results, in these tables, show that the study materials are

accepted for use in the asphalt mix.

4.2 Marshall TestIn order to find the Optimum Asphalt Contents (OAC) and the corresponding properties (stability, flow, air

voids, voids in mineral aggregates and unit weight ) for the investigated mixes, Marshall mix design procedurewas performed. The test criterion selected for a 75- blows Marshall compaction According to ASTM D 1559

and AASHTO T-245 [10, 11].

4.3 Indirect Tensile TestThe indirect tensile test used in this study was developed by Carnerio and Barcells [15] in Brazile and

Akazawa [16] in Japan. Primarily the test was used to evaluate the tensile strength of concrete[17]. After thatThomspon [18] showed that the test can be used to evaluate tensile strength of lime-stone mixtures. These

simplified relations for calculating the Indirect tensile strength for 4in. diameter specimen with 0.5 in. widecovered loading strip are as follows:

Indirect tensile strength, ITS, psi = 0.156 Pf /H

Where:Pf = Total load at failure, Ib;H = Height of specimen; in.

4.4 Loss of Stability Test

Loss of stability test, which is simplified version of AASHTO-T165, was used to measure mixdurability by evaluating the resistance of the investigated mixes to moisture damage. This test is intended tomeasure the loss of stability resulting from the action of water on compacted asphalt mixtures by comparing thestability of dry specimens which have been immersed in water path at 60 C for certain times, 0.5 and 24 hours.

V.

Results and AnalysisThe routine mix characteristics (OAC), unit weight, stability, flow, VMA, and air voids) according to

Marshall Test as well as indirect tensile strength, and loss of stability of the investigated mixes are discussed inthe following paragraphs.

5.1 Analysis of Marshall Test Results.Table (9) shows the results of Marshall test of the investigated mixes.

5.1.1Analysis of Optimum Asphalt Content ResultsBased on Marshall test results presented in table (9) is plotted to show the optimum asphalt content

percent for the investigated mixtures. From the curve it can be noticed that the optimum asphalt content is

decreased as the RAP percent increase. This may be due to the old asphalt filled the pores of the RAP.Moreover, increasing RAP percent from zero to 30% decreases the optimum asphalt content from 5% to 4.5%.This means that saving in optimum asphalt content by about 10% is achieved. On the other hand, when RAPpercent reaches 40%, the optimum asphalt content reaches 4.35%only. This means that when using identicalweights of virgin and recycled aggregate, asphalt content saving reaches about 13%. This saving in asphaltcontent maybe due to the old asphalt filled RAP pores.

To examine the relationship between optimum asphalt content and recycled percent figure (2) wasplotted. From this figure, the same trend and discussion presented for figure (2) is checked. The relationship

between optimum asphalt content % (O.A.C) and Recycled % is as follows:

OAC = 4.99490.0158 RAP ,R2=0.9809


4/13



5.1.2 Analysis of Unit Weight ResultsInvestigating the effect of using RAP on the density of asphalt mixtures. The data in the table(9) show

that using RAP has unpronounced effect on the mix unit weight. However unit weight is decreased as reclaimedpercent increases. It must be noticed that, increasing RAP percent from zero to 40% reduce the unit weight byonly 2.34%.

To examine the relationship between mix density content and recycled percent figure (3) was plotted. Therelationship between mix density content and Recycled % (R) is as follows:-

Mix Density = 2.43540.0015 RAP ,R2= 0.9509

5.1.3 Analysis of Mix Stability ResultsOne of the most important properties of asphalt mix is the stability. The mix stability is an important

indicator for resisting pavement distresses. The stability of the investigated mixtures is presented in the table(9). Referring to the table it can be noticed that, the mix stability is decreased as RAP percent increase. It can bealso noted that, increasing recycled aggregate percent from zero to 30% decrease the stability value from 4000

ib to 3000 ib i.e. decreased by about 25%. While the stability value reaches 2700 ib when the reclaimed percentreaches 40% i.e. decreased by about 31%. Although all mixes give an acceptable stability value, a suddendecrease is occurred for reclaimed percent of more than 30%. After using the RAP, the increment in decreasing

in stability values ranges from 70 to 100 ib for 10 to 30 percent of using RAP. The decreasing in stability valuereached to 300 ib between 30 and 40 percent of using RAP. Therefore, it is recommended to use reclaimedmaterial up to the percent of 30% only.

To deduce the relationship between mix stability and recycled aggregate percent figure (4) was plotted.The relationship between mix stability and recycled percent is as follows:

Stability = 3796 -28.502 RAP ,R2= 0.8761

5.1.4 Analysis of Mix Flow ResultsMix flow value gives an indicator for the resistance to permanent deformation. Based on the flow

values obtained for all the investigated mixtures, table (9) was prepared. Generally, the mix flow is increases as

the RAP percent increases. When RAP percent increases from zero to 30%, the flow value increases from 10.1

(0.01 inch) to 15.8 (0.01 inch). The increment of increasing in flow values are 0.9, 1.3, 2.3, and 1.2 betweenzero, 10, 20, 25, and 30 percent of using RAP respectively. So, the increment in increasing in flow values

ranges from 0.9 to 2.30 for zero to 30 percent of using RAP. The increasing in flow value reached to 3.2between 30 and 40 percent of using RAP. It must be noted that the mix flow reaches a value of 19 ( 0.01 inch )as the recycled aggregate percent reaches to 40%. This flow value is out of specification limits. Therefore, it is

recommended to use reclaimed material up to the percent of 30% only. The flow values are over theSpecification limits. To derive the relationship between mix flow and recycled percent, figure (5) was plotted.The relationship between mix flow and recycled percent is as follows.

Mix flow = 9.0918+0.2316 RAP ,R2= 0.9332

5.1.5 Analysis 0f Air voids resultsThe air voids is an important factor that must be considered when designing asphalt Concrete mixture.

The air voids limits are the range (3-5) % of the total mix volume. When air voids lower than 3% bleeding of

asphalt will occur specially with higher temperature degrees causing decreasing of asphalt in the pavement withtime. This decrease in the asphalt content will already cause pavement cracking. On the other hand for air voidspercent greater than 5% of the mix, the pavement will be weak and unstable. For these considerations the

asphalt binder is a very sensitive element in pavement design. The results of the investigated mixes are shown intable (9). Based on the air voids results in the table. Analyzing the data in the table, it can be seen that increasingthe RAP percent will decrease the corresponding air voids ratio. This may be attributed to the old asphalt filledthe aggregate pores which minimize the voids percent. Increasing the RAP percent from zero to 30% decreases

the air voids percent from 4.1% to 3% i.e by about 26.83%. Further increase in the reclaimed percent will leadsto more decreasing in air voids percent. When the recycled aggregate percent reaches 40%, the air voidspercent reaches 2.5 % i.e. decreased by about 39%. Moreover, the mix (M6) in which RAP percent is 40% gives

air voids percent of 2.5% i.e out of the specification range (3% 5%). Based on this discussion, it can beconcluded that the RAP percent must not exceed 30% of the total aggregate weight to ensure acceptable airvoids range. This recommendation is very important to avoid asphalt bleeding after construction. To derive the

relationship between mix air voids and recycled aggregate percent, figure (6) was plotted. The relationshipbetween mix air voids and Recycled % is as follows:


5/13



%AV = 4.2980.0411 RAP ,R2= 0.9321

5.1.6 Analysis of Voids in Mineral Aggregate ResultsTable (9) presents the voids in mineral aggregate for all the investigated mixes. From the table it can be

discovered that, the voids in mineral aggregate are increased as the RAP percent increase achieving values in the

range between 15% and 16.9% for the mixes M1 and M6 respectively. This may be due to the ineffective oldasphalt in the aggregate pores which prevent the new asphalt from occupying deeply the aggregate pores. It isobvious that the increase in voids in mineral aggregate is of low rate up to reclaimed percent of 30%. After thatthe voids in mineral aggregate is increased with high rate. For this reason, it is recommended that the recycledaggregate percent must not exceed 30% for satisfactory filed performance of the mix. To derive the relationship

between the voids in mineral aggregate and the recycled percent, figure (7) was plotted. The relationshipbetween voids in mineral aggregate and Recycled % is as follows:

VMA = 14.963 + 0.0522 RAP ,R2= 0.9662

5.2 Analysis of Indirect Tensile Test ResultsThe indirect tensile strength (ITS) was conducted on asphalt concrete samples prepared at the optimum

asphalt content obtained in Marshall test. This test is considered an important measure for the ability of the mixto resist cracking. The results of the indirect tensile strength test are presented in table (11). It is clear thatincreasing of recycled material percent decreases the mix indirect tensile strength. The rate of decreasing

indirect tensile strength is smaller during the first five mixes (M1 to M6) in which the recycled aggregatepercent is up to 30%. After that the rate of decreasing indirect tensile strength is increased. It is noticed thatincreasing recycled percent from zero to 30% resulted in a decrease in indirect tensile strength by about 25% ofits original value (zero recycling aggregate percent). But when the RAP percent reaches 40%, the reduction in

the indirect tensile strength reaches 39.8 psi; i.e. by about 34% of its original value at the mix (M1). Thereforeit is recommended to use the RAP up to about 30% of the total aggregate weight to avoid pavement crackingafter construction. To derive the relationship between the indirect tensile strength and recycled aggregate

percent, figure (8) was plotted. The relationship between the indirect tensile strength and Recycled % is asfollows:

ITS = 60.90.508 RAP, R2= 0.9831

5.3 Analysis of Loss Of Stability Test ResultsThe loss of stability test was conducted on asphalt concrete samples prepared at the optimum asphalt

content obtained in Marshall test. This test is considered an important measure of mix durability by evaluatingthe resistance of the investigated mixes to moisture damage. The results of the loss of stability test are presented

in table (10), It is clear that increasing of recycled material percent increases the loss of stability of mix. The rateof increasing of loss of stability values is smaller during the first five mixes (M1 to M6) in which the recycledaggregate percent is up to 30%. After that the rate of increasing of loss of stability value is increased. It is

noticed that, increasing recycled aggregate percent from zero to 30% resulted in an increase in loss of stabilityvalue by 7.3% i.e by about 66.4% of its original value (zero recycling aggregate percent). But when the RAP

percent reaches 40%, the increasing in loss of stability value reaches 12.7%; i.e. by about 115.5% of its originalvalue at the mix M1. Therefore, it is recommended to use the RAP up to about 30% of the total aggregate

weight.

5.4 Fatigue Life of the Recycled Mixes

- Constant Strain Fatigue Equation ConstantsThe following equation was used to fatigue life of asphalt mixes at different levels of tensile strain [19].

Nf = K( 1/ )n

Where:Nf = number of cycles to failure.

=initial strainLog. K =7.92 - 0.122 Stn = 0.0374 St0.744

St = the tensile strength.


6/13



Figure (9) shows the relationship between fatigue life of investigated mixes and different levels of tensile strain.From this figure, it can be noticed that, at levels of tensile strain higher than 5.5x10-4(in/in), the fatigue life of

the recycled mixes is lower than that if the fatigue life of the control mix (M1 zero percent of recycledaggregate) i.e. the fatigue life decreases with increasing the percent of recycled aggregate. This refers to thehardness of the aged asphalt. At low levels of tensile strain, less than 5.5x10-4(in/in), the recycled mix have

higher fatigue life than of the control mix (M1zero percent of recycled aggregate) i.e. the fatigue life increaseswith increasing the percent of recycled aggregate in mix.

VI. Modifications To Batch PlantModifications are required in the batch plant to recycle RAP since attempts to introduce RAP directly

with the virgin aggregates result in excessive smoke and material build-up problems in the dryer, hot elevator

and screen tower. The most widely used method for batch plant hot-mix recycling is the Maplewood Method.which is most commonly used. Figure (10) shows the schematic of the suggested batch plant which basically

has a separate cold feed bin introduces the RAP into the weigh hopper. The cold pre-screened RAP is delivereddirectly into the weigh hopper of the batch tower along with the superheated virgin aggregate from a hot bin.The RAP is delivered from a RAP bin through an inclined conveyor having automatic plant controls. In thisprocess, the RAP material may be added after material from bin 1 is added to the weigh hopper and before thematerial from bins 2, 3 and 4 are added to the weigh hopper. In this way the RAP is sandwiched between the hot

virgin aggregates and gets more time to heat up. A mild explosion results from instant evaporation of the RAPmoisture when the unmixed aggregates are discharged into the pugmill. To scavenge the mixer during the steamgeneration a baghouse with considerable capacity is required unless the dump time of the weigh hopper isincreased[17]. Table (12) shows the recommended virgin aggregate temperature depends on both the RAP

percent and its moisture content.

VII.

Cost EffectivenessAll the different types of recycling methods are usually cheaper than the conventional rehabilitation

methods, even though the relative savings will depend on the kind of recycling technique used. The primarysaving in hot and cold mix recycling comes from savings in the cost of virgin asphalt materials. The objective of

this session is to present the economics associated with the use of recycled asphalt materials. Expenditures andcost comparisons with the use of conventional HMA mixes are summarized from available highwayconstruction data.

The cost associated with recycling can be presented on a material cost as well as construction cost basis.Tables (13) and (14) show the amount of savings that can be made by using recycled asphalt pavement (RAP)instead of using virgin material (20). Considering 45 pound per cubic meter and 3800 pounds per ton as average

costs of aggregate and liquid asphalt, respectively, the cost of a 100 percent virgin mix with 5 percent asphaltcomes out to be 232.75 pounds per ton. If the contractor uses the milling machine and hauls the RAP back tothe HMA plant, the total cost for RAP is 120 pounds per ton, considering 100 pounds per ton for machine and

labor for milling, and 20 pounds per ton for trucking cost. Table (14) shows the savings in using differentpercentages of RAP. It should be noted that these savings are in first cost. Table shows that the use of 30%RAP in hot mix asphalt will save 14.5% of its initial cost.

VIII.

ConclusionsBased on the analysis and discussion of the study results, the following conclusion may be obtained:

1.

The optimum asphalt content is decreased as the RAP percent increase.

2.

Increasing RAP percent from zero to 30% by weight of coarse aggregate decrease the optimum asphalt content from5% to 4.5% (saving in asphalt is 10%). While increasing the recycled aggregate to 40% reducing the asphalt contentto 4.35% only (saving in asphalt by 13%).

OAC = 4.99490.0158 RAP, R2=0.98093.

Increasing RAP has unpronounced effect on the mix unit weight. However, increasing RAP from zero to 40%

decreases the mix density by 2.34% only,

Mix Density = 2.43540.0015 RAP ,R2= 0.95094.

Mix stability decreases as the recycled aggregate percent increases. This may due to the fatigue of such materials byaging.

5.

Increasing RAP percent from zero to 30%, decreases the stability value by about 22%. However, this decrease reaches31% when reclaimed percent reaches 40%.

Stability = 3796 -28.502 RAP ,R2= 0.87616.

The mix flow increased as the RAP percent increased.Mix flow = 9.0918+0.2316 RAP ,R2= 0.9332

7.

Increasing the recycled aggregate percent in the asphalt mixes decreases the air voids percent which may leads toasphalt bleeding.

8.

Increasing recycled aggregate percent to 30% decrease the air voids by about 27% but it still in the allowable range


7/13



%AV = 4.2980.0411 RAP ,R2= 0.93219.

Asphalt mix with RAP percent of 40% gives air voids percent of 2.5% which is out of the specification range.10.

Increasing of recycled material percent decreases the mix indirect tensile strength. However, the reduction in mixtensile strength is more significant when the percent of RAP is higher than 30 %.

11. Increasing of recycled material percent increases the loss of stability of asphalt mix. However, the increasing in loss ofstability of asphalt mix is more significant when the percent of RAP is higher than 30 %.

IX. RecommendationsBased on the study analysis and conclusions, the following recommendations are obtained:

1.

The RAP is recommended to use in the hot asphalt mixes to save the virgin aggregate for longer time and

also to improve the environment.2.

A percent of RAP may be 30% is suitable to be used in pavement.3.

A large scale study is recommended taking into considerations several factors to investigate the behavior of

the mixtures containing RAP.4.

Conducting of field testing of service courses made of RAP mixes is highly recommended in the future toreflect the actual performance under the environmental condition experience.

References[1].

Betenson W.D. "Recycled Asphalt Concrete in Utah", Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol.48,

1979, pp. 272295.[2].

Mallick, B.R., Lecture Notes, A3- day workshop on "Recycling and Other Pavement Rehabilitation Methods", IIT Kanpur, 8-10 th

February, 2005, pp. 58350.

[3].

Holtz, K. and Eighmy, T.T., "Scanning European Advances in the Use of Recycled Materials in Highway Construction", Public

Roads, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2000, pp. 34- 40.

[4]. Ikeda, T., and Kimura, M. "Recent Development in Recycling Asphalt Pavements in Japan", Proceedings of 8 th International

Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Seattle, Washington, 1997, pp. 99106.

[5]. Dar-Hao Chen and John Bilyeu, "Assessment of a Hot-in Place Recycling Process", Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering,

Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 265-276 (2001).

[6].

Federal Highway Administration, "Asphalt Pavement Recycling", Department of Transportation, TR News, JulyAugest 1985.

[7].

Epps, J. A., Terrel, R. L., Little, D.N. and Holmgreen, R. J., "Guidelines for Recycling Asphalt Pavements", Proceedings of the

Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Voi. 49, 1980, pp. 144-176.

[8].

Newcomb, D.E., Brown, E. R. and Epps, J. A Designing HMA Mixtures with high RAP Contents a Practical Guide Quality

Improvement Series 124, National Asphalt Pavement Association, Lanham, MD, 2007.

[9].

Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Recycling Policy Website: www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/recycling/index.cfm,visited

June 2009

[10].

"Maximum Specific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures", American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO) T209, 1986, pp. 759762.

[11].

"Maximum Specific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures", American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), D2041, 1978.

[12]. Carnero, F.L. and Barcellos, A., "Concrete Tensile Strength", International Association of Testing and Research Laboratory for

Materials and Structures, Bull. No. 3, March, 1953.

[13]. Akazawa, T. "Tension Test Method for Concrete", International Association of Testing and Research Laboratory for Materials and

Structures, Bull. No. 6, Nov., 1953.

[14]. Hudson, W.R. and Kennedy, T. W., "An Indirect Tensile Test for Research", the University of Texas at Austin, Jan., 1968.

[15]. Thompson, M.R. "Split Tensile Strength of Lime Stabilized Soils", HRB, Highway Research Record, No. 92, 1990

[16]. "Simple Procedure for Fatigue Characterization of Bituminous Concrete", Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, Jan.,

1976.

[17]. Proven Guidelines for Hot-Mix Recycling, Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association, Annapolis, MD, 1986 .

Table (1): Standard Mix gradation and selected Mix Gradation.

Sieve Size% Passing by weight

Specifications ( 4C ) Selected gradation1 inch 100 100

3/4 inch 80-90 80

1/2 inch ------ 85

3/8 inch 60-80 70

No. 4 48-65 56.5

No. 8 35 - 50 42.5

No. 30 19-30 24.5

No. 50 13-23 18

No. 100 7-15 11

No. 200 3-8 5.5


8/13



Table (2): Properties of Coarse Aggregates.Test

No.Test Designation Agg 1 Agg 2 Specification limits

1 Specific gravity

Bulk AASHTO T-85 2.513 2.44

Saturated, surface-dry AASHTO T-85 2.568 2.532

Apparent AASHTO T-85 2.66 2.681

2 Water absorption (%) AASHTO T-85 2.2 3.6 53 Los Angeles abrasion, 100 revolutions (%) AASHTO T-96 7 6 10

4 Los Angeles abrasion, 500 revolutions (%) AASHTO T-96 31 32 40

Table (3) Coarse Aggregate Gradation

Sieve size% Passing by weight

Agg 1 Agg 2

3/4 100

1/2 98.9 21.7

3/8 77.6 2.5

No. 4 28 0.34

No. 8 0.8

Table (4) Gradation of Sand.

Sieve size % Passing by weightNo. 16 100

No. 30 97

No. 50 37

No. 100 6.4

No. 200 1.8

Table (5): Gradation of Mineral Filler.Sieve size % Passing by weight Specification limits

No. 30 100 100

No. 50 99.7 -

No. 100 94 85

No. 200 82.7 65

Table (6): Properties of Asphalt Cement.Test No. Test Designation Result Specs limits

1 Penetration (0.1mm, 25C, 100 gm, 5 sec.) AASHTO T-49 63 60-70

2 Kinematic viscosity (centistokes, 135C) AASHTO T-201 346 320

3 Flash point (C) AASHTO T-48 +270 250

4 Softening point (ring and ball test, C) AASHTO T-53 52 45-55

Table (7): Extraction Test Results for the Recycled Material%pass

sieve size

Recycled Material Gradation for

sample number Specifications

1 2

3/4\\ 100 99 100

1/2\\ 85 89 66-95

3/8\\ 75 79 54-88

No. 4 45 52 37-70

No. 8 30 36 26-52

No. 30 22 26 13-30

No. 50 12 14 8-23

No. 100 7 8 6-16

No. 200 4.3 5.4 4-10

Asphalt Content, % 4.42 4.78

Table (8): Los Angeles abrasion for RAP

Test No. Test Designation Agg 1 Specification limits

1 Los Angeles abrasion, 100 revolutions (%) AASHTO T-96 910

2 Los Angeles abrasion, 500 revolutions (%) AASHTO T-96 37 40


9/13



Table (9): Marshall Test Results for the Investigated mixes

MIX NO. AC%DENSITY STABILITY FLOW

AV% VMA%(gm/cm3) (ib) 0.01inch

M1 5 2.429 4000 10.1 4.1 15

M2 4.8 2.425 3250 11 4.2 15.3

M3 4.7 2.41 3180 12.3 3.6 16.1M4 4.65 2.402 3083 14.6 3.45 16.3

M5 4.5 2.388 3000 15.8 3 16.7

M6 4.35 2.372 2700 19 2.5 16.9

AC% : Optimum Asphalt Content

AV% : Air VoidsVMA%: Voids in Mineral Aggregate

Table (10): loss of stability Test Results for the Investigated mixes

MIX NO.STABILITY 1/2

hour

STABILITY 24

hour

Loss of

STABILITYSpecification limits

M1 3920 3490 11%

25%

M2 3320 2840 14.5%

M3 3250 2710 16.6 %M4 2980 2450 17.7%

M5 3050 2490 18.3 %

M6 2740 2090 23.7 %

Table (11): Indirect Tensile Strength for the Investigated mixes

MIX ID. % RAP % O.A.C ITS (Ib/in2

M1 % 0 5 60.2

M2 % 10 4.8 55.5

M3 % 20 4.7 52.4

M4 % 25 4.65 48.8

M5 % 30 4.5 45.2

M6 % 40 4.35 39.8

Table (12) Required Aggregate Temperatures for 30/70% RAP, and Aggregate RatiosC. Ratio: 30% RAP/

70% Aggregate

0 157(315) 179(345) 191(375) 207(405)

1 168(335) 185(365) 202(395) 218(425)

2 182(360) 199(390) 216(420) 232(450)

3 196(385) 213(415) 229(445) 246(475)

4 210(410) 227(440) 243(470) 260(500)

5 224(435) 241(465) 257(495) 274(525)

Table (13): Comparison of cost for virgin and RAP mix

Total Cost/tonCost/tonPercent used (%)Item

42.754595Aggregate

19038005Asphalt Binder232.75Virgin Mix

RAP

2010Trucking

100100Milling*

120RAP Mix

From BelbiesZagazig road maintenance project, GARBLT, 2013.

Table (14): Savings by using RAP (based on reference, J D BROCK,20).Savings, %Savings, $/ton Cost/TonCost/tonPercent of RAP Savings, %

00232.750%

4.811.25221.510%

9.722.55210.220%

14.533.85198.930%19.445.1187.6540%

24.256.375176.37550%


10/13



Figure (1): Experimental Testing Program

Figure (2): Relationship between Optimum Asphalt Content and recycled percentage

Figure (3): Relationship between Unit weight and recycled percentage


11/13



Figure (4): Relationship between Marshall Stability and Recycled percentage

Figure (5): Relationship between mix flow and Recycled percentage

Figure (6): Relationship between AirVoids and the Recycled percentage


12/13



Figure (7): Relationship between Voids in mineral aggregate percent and the Recycled percentage

Figure (8): Relationship between ITS percent and the Recycled percentage

Figure (9) the relationship between fatigue life and tensile strain


13/13



Figure (10) the schematic of the suggested batch plant

Ahmed Mohamady Abd-Allah is currently assistant professor of highway engineering and

airports, faculty of engineering, Zagazig university. He has a PH.D in Highway Engineering,Cairo University, Egypt (September 2001). His areas of interest include PavementEvaluation and Assessment, Pavement Distresses and Rehabilitation, Field and Laboratory

Testing in Highway Engineering, Pavement Management Systems, Laboratory Testing forHighway Materials and Asphalt Mixes, Improving the Properties of Highway Materials,Behavior of Asphalt Mix Under Environmental Effects and Pavement Survey and Evaluation

of Pavement Condition Index (PCI).Thesis Supervision:

17 M.Sc. Students in Highway Engineering.6 Ph.D. Students in Highway Engineering.

Ashraf Elshahat his main field of interest is pavement management system, he prepared

the (PMS) of ministry of municipality of Saudi kingdom with a specialist teamwork during(20072009), he prepared the construction speed of makka munupilaty with zuhir fayesteamwork, he supposed a lot of construct project in Egypt during 1995- 1999 and 2010-

now.

Mahmoud Fathy Abdel-Maksoud Khamis is a lecturer in department of ConstructionEngineering and Utilities, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Sharkia,Egypt. He received his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Zagazig University, Egypt, in 2005.

His fields of interest include highway structure design, characterization of asphalt andasphalt mixtures, characterization of granular material and subgrade soil, use of recycledmaterials in highway construction, pavement maintenance and rehabilitation.

Mohamed Hoseny AbdAllah Hassan is Civil engineer in General Authority for Roads,

Bridges and Land Transportation (GRBLT) from ( 2006until now ). He Supervise a lotof projects in road construction and maintenance. He Supervised Road project tests inAuthoritys Laboratory

Date post:	02-Jun-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	international-organization-of-scientific-research-iosr
View:	222 times
Download:	1 times

Effect of Using Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement on Asphalt Mix Performance

Documents