Effective Reduction of Industrial GHG Emissions via Energy Integration and
Biomass Utilization
Eva Lovelady and Mahmoud El-Halwagi
Process Integration and Systems Optimization GroupDepartment of Chemical Engineering
Texas A & M University
1Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
1
Motivation• Substantial quantities from energy utilities• GHGs + Precursors for Ozone
Gaseous Wastes
pulpwashwater
RawMaterials Products
este
r
screeningBrown Stock Washing
chipspulp water
O D D DE E
Fuel/Energy Byproducts
Dig
e
conc
entra
tor Recovery Boiler
cond.cond.
weak SBL
FlueGas
Material Utilities Wastes
ESP
Multiple Effect Evaporators
white liquor
black liquor
weak
dissolving weak white liquor
dust recycle
smeltsalt
cakewashwater
wash
fluegaslime mud
white liquorclarifier
dregslime kilntank
mud washer
mud filter dregs
washer& filter
washwater
2Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
2
slaker green liquor clarifiercausticizer grits
Primary Responsibilities/Goals of Process EngineersGoals of Process EngineersFaster, Better, Cheaper, Safer, & Greener
Profitability Improvementld h
Specific Objectives:
Yield EnhancementResource (mass and energy) ConservationPollution Prevention/Waste Minimization
Safety ImprovementSafety ImprovementQuality Enhancement
How?
3Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
3
Traditional Approaches to Process Development and ImprovementProcess Development and Improvement
Brainstorming among experienced engineers
Heuristics based on experience-based rules
Evolutionary techniques: Copy (or adapt) the lastdesign we or someone else designed
4Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
4
Weaknesses/Limitations of Traditional Approaches Traditional Approaches
Time and money intensive
Cannot enumerate the infinite alternatives
Not guaranteed to come close to optimum
Does not shed light on global insights & keycharacteristics of the process
Limited range of applicabilityLimited range of applicability
Severely limits groundbreaking and novel ideas
5Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
5
Solution?
Systematic, fundamental, & generally applicable techniques
Process Synthesis Process Analysisy y
Process Integration
6Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
6
Process Synthesis Process Analysis
Process Integration
Process Synthesis
ProcessProcess Inputs(Given)
Process Outputs(Given)
ProcessStructure
& Parameters(Given) (Given)(Unknown)
7Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
7
Process Synthesis Process Analysis
Process Integration
Process Analysis/Simulationy
Process Inputs(Gi )
Process Outputs(U k )
ProcessStructure
& Parameters(Given) (Unknown)& Parameters(Given)
8Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
8
Process Integration =Process Integration
gProcess Synthesis + Process Analysis + Process Optimization
Global InsightsGlobal Insights,Overall Interactions,Performance Targets,
Major Structural
ProcessSynthesis
ProcessAnalysis
Decisions
Input/Output Relations,Performance vs. Designand Operating Conditions
Process Optimization: Selection of the best solution fromamong the set of candidate solutions. Optimization derives the
9Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
9
g piteration between synthesis and analysis to an optimal closure.
Why Integration?y g
Mass Integration
Energy Integration
A need exists for an integration framework:
•Guide/assist process synthesis
•Conserve process resources
10Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
10
MSA’s (Lean Streams In)S1L1?
S2L2?
SjLj?
SNSLNS?
Massy1
t
y2t
R1, G1, y1s
R2, G2, y2s
x1s x2
sj
xjs xNS
t
Waste (Rich)
Waste (Rich)
ExchangeNetwork
yit
yNRt
Ri, Gi, yis
RNR, GNR, yNRs
( )Streams(Sources) In
(Rich) Streams(Sources) O tNetwork
t t t t
In Out
x1t x2
t xjt xNS
t
MSA’s (Lean Streams Out)
11Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
11Schematic Representation of the MEN Synthesis Problem
MassExchanged
Excess Capacityof Process MSAs
Mass ExchangePinch Point
RichComposite
LeanComposite
MaximumIntegrated
MassStreamStreamMinimum
LoadFor
MassExchange
sx tx 11
1 ε−−=
byx
yForExternal
MSAs
12Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
12
x1
sx2
x1
tx2
11
1 m
22
22 ε−−=
mbyx
El-Halwagi and Manousiouthakis, 1989
DESIGN CHALLENGES
• Which mass-exchange technologies should be used?
• Which MSAs should be used?
• What is optimum flowrate of each MSA?p
• Where should each MSA be used (stream pairing)?
S t fi ti ?• System configuration?
13Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
13
What is Process Integration?
A holistic approach to process design, retrofitting,and operation, which emphasizes the unity of the process.
Involves:
1.) Task identification
2.) Targeting
3.) Generation of alternatives (Synthesis)
4 ) Selection of alternatives (Synthesis)4.) Selection of alternatives (Synthesis)
5.) Analysis of selected alternatives
14Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
14
Targeting
Identification of performance benchmarksfor the whole process AHEAD of detailed design
Specific Performance Targets:
Profitability improvement (maximization)
Yield enhancement (maximization)
Resource (mass & energy) conservation (minimization)
Pollution prevention/waste minimization (minimization)
Safety improvement (maximization)
15Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
15
y p ( )
Categories of Process Integration
Energy
Property
ProcessMass
Mass Integration
+Energy Integration Process Integration
+
Property Integration+
16Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
16
Property Integration
Research ThemeReduction of GHGs and ozone precursors from industrial sources via:
1. Energy integration
energy conservation, cost savings, NO & CO reductionNOx & CO2 reduction
2. Incorporation of biomass into utility systems (e.g., co-firing)
Carbon recycling during growth (photosynthesis)Reduction in GHG emissions
• In-plant pollution prevention not end-of-pipe pollution control• Environmental benefit + cost and energy savings: win-win
17Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
17
Problem StatementConsider a process with:• A set of specific heating and cooling demands• Steam demands for non-heating purposes such as tracing, blanketing, stripping, etc.
A i i f l i • A certain requirement of electric power• A header system with steam generated by process operations and external fuel• A set of fossil fuels and biomass streams that may be used as energy sources in the processThe objective is to develop a systematic and generally applicable approach to target j p y g y pp pp gprocess cogeneration that effectively uses process sources and external biomass and biowaste streams while satisfying the process heating and non-heating steam demands, and to determine the GHG pricing options required to compete with fossil fuel cogeneration or electricity bought from external sources.
Product & Byproduct
F lR M t i l
Water
StPROCESS UTILITIES
Atmospheric Pollutants
Biomass
Power
FuelRaw Material
Waste Heat
Fuel
Power
Steam
18Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
18Waste Waste
Research Questions
• What are the optimum quantities and levels of heating and cooling utilities?
• At what pressure level should steam from the external fuel be generated?
• Is there a potential for power cogeneration? What is the • Is there a potential for power cogeneration? What is the cogeneration target?
• What is the optimum scheme for recycling/reusing process sources for energy purposes?sources for energy purposes?
• Can some of the combustible wastes be used instead of fresh fuel? To what extent? Where?
• What refrigeration technologies may be used (e.g., cooling towers, refrigeration cycles, absorptive refrigeration, etc.)?
19Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
19
Research Questions• What are the necessary process modifications that are required
to trade off the core-process units with the utility system?
• What cofiring ratio of biomass to fossil fuel should be used for • What cofiring ratio of biomass to fossil fuel should be used for external fuel steam generation?
• What is the benchmark for maximum cogeneration potential by utilization of biomass and biowaste streams and minimum usage utilization of biomass and biowaste streams and minimum usage of external thermal utilities?
• What is the benchmark for minimum emission of GHGs and ozone precursors (on a lifecycle basis) for the scenarios of using ozone precursors (on a lifecycle basis) for the scenarios of using current technologies, new technologies, and incorporating biomass into the utility system?
• What are the sound policy recommendations that will enable • What are the sound policy recommendations that will enable market penetration of biomass-based cogeneration in the process industries? What are the corresponding technical and economic issues? What are the net reductions in ozone precursors and GHG emissions?
20Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
20
Project Objectives• Develop a systematic and generally applicable approach to the
optimization of design and operation process combined heat and power as well as integration with the core processing units Cost reduction + energy savings + reduction in GHGs and ozone precursorsenergy savings + reduction in GHGs and ozone precursors
• Determine the various feasible pathways and technologies for utilizing biomass in processing facilities, specially for cogeneration
• Provide an economic, energy and environmental evaluation of the prospects for biomass utilization in processing facilities
• Examine how potential GHG emission pricing alternatives might i fl th l ti ffi i i f lt ti t h l i d th influence the relative efficiencies of alternative technologies and other strategies as well as the power generation market penetration of biomass.
• Examine the sensitivity of the findings in the face of a wide spectrum of possibilities for variables pertaining to processing characteristics, possibilities for variables pertaining to processing characteristics, biomass availability, attributes and pricing, relative costs of power and heat, GHG trading markets and pricing, evolution of new environmental regulations, and technological advancements
21Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
21
Approach
• Process Cogeneration: energy integration, d i ti d ti i ti design, operation, and optimization
• Biomass Utilization for Energy: integration, design, operation, and optimization
• Techno-Economic-Environmental Analysis d P li R d tiand Policy Recommendations
22Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
22
Energy Integration and Combined Heat and PowerCombined Heat and Power
SCOPESCOPE• Energy conservation• Heat exchange networks• Heat exchange networks• Process cogeneration
O ti i ti f t d tilit t• Optimization of steam and utility systems
23Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
23
MotivationProduct & Byproduct
FuelRaw Material
Water
SteamPROCESS UTILITIES
Gaseous Wastes (e.g., GHGs)
Water
Power
FuelRaw Material
Waste Heat
Fuel
Power
Steam
Waste Effluent & Gaseous Waste Wastewater & Solid Waste
Optimize– Process production and operation– Fuel– Power– Steam (purchased & generated)– Water
24Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
24
– Waste Gas (e.g., GHG) Discharge
Heat Integration
Cold Streams In
HeatE hHot HotExchangeNetwork
(HEN)
HotStreams
In
HotStreams
Out
Cold Streams Out•Which heating/cooling utilities should be employed ?•Which heating/cooling utilities should be employed ?•What is the optimal heat load to be removed/added by each utility?•How should the hot and cold streams be matched (i.e., stream pairings)?•What is the optimal system configuration (e.g., how should the heat
25Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
25
exchangers be arranged? Is there any stream splitting and mixing ?)
HeatExchanged
Thermal Pinch Diagram
Exchanged
MinimumHeating Utility
Heat ExchangePinch Point
HotCold MaximumI t t dComposite
StreamComposite
StreamMinimum
IntegratedHeat
Exchange
TCoolingUtility
26Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
26minTTt Δ−=
Grand Composite Curves
• Site-wide heat integration• Targeting and selection of each utilityTargeting and selection of each utility
Linnhoff B Townsend D W Boland D Hewitt G F Thomas B E A Guy A R and
27Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
27
Linnhoff, B., Townsend, D. W., Boland, D., Hewitt, G. F., Thomas, B. E. A., Guy, A. R., and Marsland, R. H. (1982). "User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy," Warwickshire, UK.
Cogeneration in a Chemical Plant
• In the chemical Plant’s utility system, ti b i l t d bcogeneration can be implemented by:
– Cogenerating Power with heatIntegrating heat/power requirements within the – Integrating heat/power requirements within the thermodynamic cycle
28Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
28
Cogenerating Power with Heat
• Power cogeneration with heat is utilized when expanding steam from a pressure level to anothersteam from a pressure level to another.
29Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
29
Steam Headers and CHPGenerated Steam + Steam from Higher Pressure Level
Steam from aFuel Fired Generated Steam + Steam from Higher Pressure Level
High Pressure Steam Header
Fuel-FiredBoiler and/orWaste Heat Boiler(after material recycle)
High Pressure Steam HeaderProcess Heat Demand,Process Cooling Demand,Process Non-heating/coolingDemand, vent, losses Back-pressure
(Topping)MultistageExtraction Condensing
BFW Let-DownValve
Turbine Turbine Turbine
Low Pressure Steam Header
Steam to lower Pressure Level
To Reheating, BFW,C d
Process Heat Demand,Process Cooling Demand,Process Non-heating/cooling
30Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
30
To Reheating, BFW,or other Destination
CondenserProcess Non-heating/coolingDemand, vent, losses
Managing Steam Headers
31Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
31
Cogeneration Power Pinch Diagram
Harell D., and El-Halwagi M., “Design Techniques and Software Development for Cogeneration Targeting
32Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
32with Mass and Energy Integration,” AIChE Spring Meeting, New Orleans, March 2003
Biomass in Utility Systemsy y• Cost reduction,
efficiency i t d
GaseousWasteimprovement, and
NOx/CO2 reduction through combined heat and power (CHP) i
VHP
Waste
(CHP) in process industries
• Capturing power generation potential HP
Process Steam Demands
through pressure reduction in steam systems: “cogeneration”
MPProcess Steam Demands
• Utilization of biomass or biowaste for partial/total
LPFossilFuels
Process Steam Demands
Process Steam D d
Biomass
33Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
33
p /cogeneration Demands
Conclusions
• Systematic and generally-applicable procedures for the design and operation of optimum cogeneration and biomass
tili ti d ti i GHG d (+ t utilization reduction in GHGs and ozone precursors (+ cost and energy savings)
• An integrated approach for analysis of technical, economic and environmental aspects of cogeneration and biomass utilization.
• In-process modifications leading to cost savings, energy conservation, and reduction in GHGs and ozone precursors.
• Strong interaction with industry• Strong interaction with industry.• Dissemination via publications, workshops, monograph, and
software.• Insights on short- and long-term solutions and
d l krecommendations to policymakers.
34Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
34
QUESTIONS?QUESTIONS?
35Process Integration and Systems Optimization Group
35
Process Integration & Systems Optimization
El Halwagi Research GroupEl-Halwagi Research GroupDepartment of Chemical Engineering
Texas A&M University