Date post: | 04-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jonathan-e-martin |
View: | 224 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 21
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
1/21
Mechanics of Launching
an Online Initiative
Michael Ehrhardt, Ed.D.
Head of School
Marshall School, Duluth MN
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
2/21
2http://sunburstkissesrowena.wordpress.com
orOops, what have I gotten us into?
http://sunburstkissesrowena.wordpress.com/http://sunburstkissesrowena.wordpress.com/http://sunburstkissesrowena.wordpress.com/7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
3/21
3
The Big Bang in Online Learning
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
4/21
4
The Big Bang in Online Learning
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
5/21
Many methods for engagement
Traveling the path to your online goals
5
Scope RelationshipNexus Entry Point
Supplemental
OR
Full-Time
Institution
OR
Individualstudents
Buy intoexpertise
OR
Build fromscratch
Partner
OR
Customer
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
6/21
6
Face-to-Face OnlineBlendedType
Delivery
Low HighModerate
Elementary HSMSGrades
Regional GlobalNationalReach
Interaction
Source: Adapted from Gregg Vanourek, A Primer on Virtual Charter Schools (2006) and Keeping Pace (2012)
Factors to evaluate when you review programs / partnerships
Dimensions of Online Programs
Async Co-SyncSynch
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
7/21
Benefits associated with collaborative model
Rationale
7
Mission Integrating 21st century skills into curriculum
ProgramExpanding course catalog beyond what can be offeredlocally
Professional Capturing faculty ready to move and pushing otherfaculty to find ways to integrate new skills
Costs
Sharing research and development and economies of
scale
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
8/21
Different groups will require different approaches
Conversations
8
Trustees Linking online learning to mission of the school
FacultyOvercoming conservative tendencies / answeringpractical questions
Parents Differentiating from remedial reputation of manyonline classes
StudentsDispelling myths of the gut course
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
9/219
Five years from now on the Web for
free youll be able to find the bestlectures in the world. It will be betterthan any single university.
Bill Gates in 2010
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
10/21
Federal meta-study points to learning advantages of online andblended learning
10
Data supports benefits of online ed
Enhanced Performance
Students who took all or part of their class onlineperformed better, on average, than those taking the samecourse through traditional face-to-face instruction.
Benefits for all types The effectiveness of online learning approaches appears to
be quite broad across different content and learner types.
Source: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning, US Department of Education (2009)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
11/2111
Increased student engagement
Development of innovation
skills -- critical thinking and
creativity
Increased collaboration and
more self-directed learning
Mobile tools fit goals of online schools
Source: The William and Ida Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University (March 2011)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
12/2112
By 2015, as many college students will be exclusively online as
are exclusively on face-to-face campuses
College students in online courses
11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Source: Babson Research Group and Ambient Insight
Current
Projected
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
13/2113
80%Percentage of states that havestate virtual schools or state-led online learning initiatives
75% of districts report
courses developed elsewhereMost common provider:universities
Source: iNACOL Fast Facts about Online Learning (February 2012)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
14/21
Key questions to consider before you get started
14
Setting up the program
Who grants the credit? / What do you put on your
transcripts?
What courses do you allow (graduation requirements)?
Which students can take online courses?
When and where are the courses scheduled?
Drop/add policies and mixed start/end times
Who provides the in-house support for your students?
Source: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning, US Department of Education (2009)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
15/21
Timeline of groups to be included
15
The Process
Study Group(s): Mission, Landscape, Whys, Hows
Action Committee:Try out options/expand research
Pilot Project:Test with limited grade, group
Policy: Determine rules of the game
Launch: Faculty, Students, Parents, Trustees
Ongoing Communication: Highlight Innovation/Successes
Source: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning, US Department of Education (2009)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
16/21
Variety of ways to leverage outside expertise to build program
Case Studies
16
School-Led
Consortium
Student-Led
Courses
Faculty-Led
MOOCs
Large catalog of AP and elective
courses expands options for
students. Teachers receive
training to teach VHS courses
to other students in
collaborative. Classes capped at
25 students.
Students must apply and be
accepted into program
individually. Courses taught via
web video and blended learning
approach. Students can remain
enrolled in regular school.
Separate OHS transcript issued.
Individual teachers can embed
certain elements of a MOOC
into their regular course, and
supplement with discussion,
projects and essays. For a fee, a
student can purchase credentials
in the Signature Track.
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
17/2117
VHS Collaborative in Action
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
18/21
http://mehrhardt.wordpress.com/bibliography/
19
Bibliography
Keeping Pace 2012
Babson Survey of Online Education in the US
US Dept of Ed Online Learning Metastudy
NAIS Online Education Literature Review
Natl Center for Ed Stats: Condition of Education
iNACOL Course Standards
Source: Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning, US Department of Education (2009)
http://mehrhardt.wordpress.com/bibliography/http://mehrhardt.wordpress.com/bibliography/7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
19/21
Evaluating the quality of online curriculum
iNACOL Online Standards
21
The course providesonline learners withmultiple ways ofengaging with learning
experiences that promotetheir mastery of contentand are aligned with stateor national contentstandards.
Content
The course uses learningactivities that engagestudents in activelearning; providesstudents with multiplelearning paths to master;the content is based onstudent needs; andprovides ampleopportunities forinteraction andcommunication.
Design
The course uses multiplestrategies and activities toassess student readinessfor and progress in coursecontent and providesstudents with feedback ontheir progress.
Assessment
The course takes fulladvantage of a variety oftechnology tools, has auser-friendly interfaceand meets accessibilitystandards forinteroperability andaccess for learners withspecial needs.
Technology
The course is evaluatedregularly for effectiveness,using a variety ofassessment strategies, andthe findings are used as abasis for improvement.The course is kept up todate, both in content andin the application of newresearch on course designand technologies. Onlineinstructors are providedsupport during thecourse.
Evaluation
Source: iNACOL Online Course Standards (2011)
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
20/2122
Online courses provide massive choice
7/29/2019 Ehrhardt Oesis Mechanics of Online Ed
21/21
Michael Ehrhardt, [email protected]