Contemporary Engineering Sciences, Vol. 10, 2017, no. 19, 901 - 909
HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com
https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2017.7891
Energy Saving Potential for
Industrial Steam Boiler
Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia1, Guillermo Valencia Ochoa2
and Juan Campos Avella3
1 Industrial Eng., Research Group on Efficient Energy Management
Universidad of Atlántico, km 7 antigua vía Puerto, 081008
Barranquilla, Colombia
2 Mechanical Eng., Research Group on Efficient Energy Management
Universidad of Atlántico, km 7 antigua vía Puerto, 081008
Barranquilla, Colombia
3 Research Group on Efficient Energy Management
Universidad of Atlántico, km 7 antigua vía Puerto, 081008
Barranquilla, Colombia
Copyright © 2017 Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia, Guillermo Valencia Ochoa and Juan Campos
Avella. This article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Abstract
This paper presents the methodology and results of applying a performance analysis
of a 75,000-pound capacity / hour capacity boiler integrated into the energy
management system for energy planning in a company, in order to identify the
potentials of energy saving. The fundamental data used to estimate the energy
performance indicators, a brief description of the equipment characteristics and the
results of the quantitative analysis of the process are presented. In addition, the
methodology proposed for this study is based on the use of the tools of an energy
management system, using the stages that carry this procedure, these stages allow
the improvement the energy consumption of the company. The study showed a
linear correlation R2 = 0.9615 and a target line of the form Et = 73.147P + 49.061
with a linear correlation R2 = 0.9782 and a saving potential by good manufacturing
practices, which are not associated with production of 6.52%, which shows that
although there are good operating practices.
Keywords: Steam Boiler, energy management system, energy performance
indicators
902 Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia et al.
1. Introduction
Boilers are pressure vessels used to heat water whose purpose is the production of
steam, which is used to generate electricity through the conduction of steam
turbines [1], and that the use of steam at the manufacturing level corresponds to the
maximum energy saving potential for a company's energy system [2]. The
quantification of this energy saving potential based on the energy performance
indicator are very useful, an example of this is the formulation of methods for the
estimation of exergetic loss and the exergetic efficiency of the boilers [3], another
case is the evaluation of the performance of a boiler in an ethanol production plant
by means of exergy and irreversibility analysis where the individual components of
the system are evaluated [4]. Other investigations are oriented to determinate
performance evaluation of the actual efficiency in the boiler, being able to present
estimates of the real efficiency and the expected efficiency, having with based the
set of historical data of the equipment [5]. On the other hand, some investigations
estimate the uncertainty in the measurements intended to determine the thermal
equilibrium of a coal boiler by different analytical method allowing to simulate the
system [6].
In this way, the concept of efficiency in boilers relate the net amount of heat that is
being absorbed by the steam generated and the net amount of heat supplied to the
boiler [7], as a result of this the improvement in efficiency allows to identify savings
in energy consumption, less use of fossil fuels and reduction of CO2 emissions [8].
It should be noted that measuring the efficiency of these equipment is linked to the
efficiency of the overall production process, through the energy management of the
industry, articulating environmental management systems and economic,
environmental and energy indicators of the company [9], [10], associating it with
the different forms of efficiency evaluation, among the most outstanding being the
calculation of performance indicators related to energy consumption and
productivity [11], [12].
This paper presents the results of an energy diagnosis by assessing energy indicators
based on historical information on the energy consumption of an industrial boiler,
identifying opportunities for organizational, energy and technological company, in
order to integrate the energy management in the different processes that underlie
integral management. In additions, the paper aims the application of the operational
data monitoring in order to obtain energy performance indicators for a industrial
steam boiler located in Colombia, with the purpose to reduce the energy
consumption based on a implementation strategic decisions strategy and energetic
characterization.
2 Methodology
In this section of the paper, a brief description of the 75,000 lbs / hr steam boiler used as an equipment to produce steam in an industrial company, also the energy
performance indicator is presented as a tool in the energy management to identify
energy-saving potentials. Finally, the steps and procedures are presented based on
Energy saving potential for industrial steam boiler 903
the quality management, supporting the continuous improvement of the energy
performance of the equipment.
2.1. Description of the steam generation system
The steam boiler studied is from the NEBRASKA CALDERAS COMPANY
which is shown in
Figure 1a, manufactured in 11-05-1993 which a capacity of 75,000 lbs / hour and
design pressure of 300 PSI. Also the initial operation pressure corresponds to 250
PSI, with current operating pressure of 205 PSI and with target operating pressure
of 180 PSI, taking into account the recommended air excess of 10% regulated with
the control systems implemented as shown on Figure 1b.
Figure 1. Steam Bolier, a) generation system; b) control system.
2.2. Assesment the energetic performance
The methodology proposed for this study is based on the use of the tools of an
energy management system, using the stages that carry this procedure, these stages
allow the improvement (reduction) of the energy consumption of the companies, in
these stages highlights the strategic decision that seeks the participation of company
executives, with the purpose of providing resources for the implementation of the
Energy Management System, later stage two lies in the calculation of energy
performance indicators through the identification that are considered significant
within the main areas of the company, finally, the so-called operational stage is
denoted, where constant monitoring of the socialization of the energy performance
indicators is carried out, thus achieving the evaluation of business energy practices,
maintenance, the production and coordination achieved through the execution of
projects, this process according to the ISO 50.001international standard is shown
below in Figure 3.
b a
904 Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia et al.
Figure 2. Stages of Energy Management Systems
The main objective in the continuous improvement of the use, energy consumption
and energy efficiency is the operational control of the significant use of the energy,
where the base line and the indicator plays a principal role , due to without this
information there is not a referent to improve.
2.3. Energy indicators Equations
In order to calculate the Energy indicators, a statistical treatment of the energy
consumption and production was conducted, allowing to determinate the base and
target line, the base 100 efficiency indicator, the graphs of accumulate trend and
finally the consumption index according to the equations (1-4).
The real consumption index (IC) was calculated with energy consumption and
production (p) as shown as follow
𝐼𝐶𝐴𝑐𝑢𝑎𝑙 =𝐸𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
𝑃, (1)
while, the theoretical consumption index was calculated as
𝐼𝐶𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 =𝐸𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝑃. (2)
The energy base line is obtained from the linear regression of historical data of
energy consumption and production; energy base line has the linear form as follow
𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑏. (3)
Finally, the efficiency Base 100 index, which is a tool for energy management that
helps to evaluate the behavior of energy consumption measured during a period of
production time, was calculates as
𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑒 100 =𝐸𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝐸𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙× 100%. (4)
ENERGY CONSUMPTIO
N REDUCTION
Purchases Design SEULegal
requirementsCapacitation
Measurement
Significantvariable
Oportunidades de
operación y mantenimie
nto
Base and goal line potential
IDEnOperational
CrieteriaOperational
control
Energy saving potential for industrial steam boiler 905
By means of this calculations were possible to identify the variations in the energy
efficiency of the process, facilitating the analysis of action plans with a view to
improving energy.
3. Results and Discussion
Below are the results of the application of the energy characterization tools and the
analysis of the energy performance indicators for their measure, verification and
control of effective operation in significant uses of energy in the steam boiler.
Control Charts
As shown in Figure 4. for the control limit graph for steam production, an upper
limit and a lower limit were set apart by three times the average deviation of the
supplied data, where it is shown that some data of the days November 2nd,
November 3th and November 17th are below the lower production limit, which
possibly correspond to maintenance stops. These data are considered atypical or
abnormal operation conditions; which will not be taken into account for the analysis
of the energy performance indicators.
Figure 4. Control limit graph for the Steam Production
On the other hand, Figure 5 shows the graph of control limits for Gas Consumption
data, where it is observed that, as in Figure 4, some data from November 2,
November 3 and November 17 below the lower production limit, which will not be
included for energy analysis.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
30-oct.-2014 4-nov.-2014 9-nov.-2014 14-nov.-2014 19-nov.-2014 24-nov.-2014
Ste
am P
rod
uct
ion
(To
n/h
)
Period (Monthly)
Steam Flow on Boiler
Superior Production Limit
Inferior Production Line
Mean Production
906 Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia et al.
Figure 5. Control limit graph for the Gas consumption
Base line and target line
When a graph of energy and production was obtained from the data supplied, a
baseline was obtained initially with a very low linear correlation due to atypical
data, and after data filtering to achieve an acceptable correlation for the analysis of
the energy performance indicators without losing the functionality between
production and energy, a baseline of the form Ebase = 74.392P + 52.478 was
obtained with a linear correlation R2 = 0.9615 and a target line of the form Etarget
= 73.147P + 49.061 with a linear correlation R2 = 0.9782 shown in Figure 6, in
which the energy saving potential associated with good manufacturing practices is
observed. Here the target line was constructed from the production data and power
consumption that are below the baseline.
Figure 6. Base line graph and Target line graph
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
30-oct.-2014 4-nov.-2014 9-nov.-2014 14-nov.-2014 19-nov.-2014 24-nov.-2014
Gas
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
m^3
/h)
Period (Monthly)
Gas flowSuperior Consumption LimitInferior Consumption LineMean Consumption
Base lineEbase = 74,392P + 52,478
R² = 0,9615Target line
Etarget = 73,147P + 49,061R² = 0,9782
400500600700800900
1 0001 1001 2001 3001 400
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Gas
Co
nsu
mti
on
(m
³/h
)
Steam Production (Ton/h)
Energy saving potential for industrial steam boiler 907
Base 100 Indicator
For the application of the base efficiency index 100 for the Boiler, shown in Figure
7; points above the black line are considered to be good energy performance data
located in the energy efficiency zone of the plant. Otherwise, when the efficiency
index is less than 100%, the data is located below the black line and indicates that
the data belong to a zone of energy inefficiency of the plant. However, it is
important to note that low efficiency peaks such as November 2nd and November
18th are associated with the random behavior of processes and are not the result of
changes in the energy management system.
Figure 7. Base 100 efficiency index
Accumulated sum Indicator
Taking into account the frequency of the month in Figure 8, three periods of time
with a clear tendency of consumption are observed, the first period presents from
November 1th to the November 7th, where one does not observe stable behavior
with good trend towards saving and a good energy yield. The second period is the
only one that is clearly visible from November 7th to November 10th, where it is
observed that there is a poor trend towards saving and regular energy efficiency,
the third period from November 10th to November 21th shows an unstable behavior
with a low energy efficiency but with a good tendency to save. In addition, it must
be taken into account that the peaks in some periods do not represent any trend,
since they can correspond to maintenance days or plant stops.
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
1-nov.-2014 5-nov.-2014 9-nov.-2014 13-nov.-2014 17-nov.-2014 21-nov.-2014
Pe
rce
nta
ge (
%)
Period (Monthly)
908 Yulineth Cárdenas Escorcia et al.
Figure 8. Cumulative trend graph
Finally, the analysis of the saving potential by good manufacturing practices for
energy not associated with production can be reduced by 6.52%, which shows that
although there are good operational practices, this can be to improve; and with
respect to the given period, there is a tendency to increase the energy efficiency.
4. Conclusions
Energy planning in high impact equipment for consumption is the basis of energy
savings in a company, thanks to the implementation of an energy management
system can identify opportunities for improvement, thus achieving energy savings,
it is important to highlight the importance of to execute good operational practices
taking into account and as basis of the analysis the study of energy indicators which
a more detailed analysis of the possible opportunities of energy saving. Finally, it
is concluded that the structuring and implementation of a methodology based on an
overall evaluation of the process allows the correct management of energy systems
in a company.
References
[1] M. Hill, Green Strategies for Operation and Maintenance. 2006.
[2] B. C. Mecrow and A. G. Jack, Efficiency trends in electric machines and drives,
Energy Policy, 36 (2008), no. 12, 4336–4341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.042
[3] A. Behbahaninia, S. Ramezani and M. Lotfi Hejrandoost, A Loss Method for
Exergy Auditing of Steam Boilers, Energy, 140 (2017), 253-260.
1.11.2014 23:00; -722kW
13.11.2014 18:00; 749 kW
-900
-700
-500
-300
-100
100
300
500
700
900
1-nov. 2-nov. 4-nov. 6-nov. 8-nov. 10-nov. 12-nov. 13-nov. 15-nov. 17-nov. 19-nov. 21-nov.
Ener
gy C
on
sum
pti
on
(m
3/h
)
Period (Monthly)
trend line
Energy saving potential for industrial steam boiler 909
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.090
[4] N. A. Pambudi M. Fasola, L.V. Perdana, R. Laurensia, D.S. Wijayanto, M.
Imran, L.H. Saw, Performance evaluation and optimization of fluidized bed
boiler in ethanol plant using irreversibility analysis, Case Stud. Therm. Eng.,
10 (2017), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2017.07.008
[5] R. P. Nikula, M. Ruusunen and K. Leiviskä, Data-driven framework for boiler
performance monitoring, Appl. Energy, 183 (2016), 1374–1388.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.072
[6] R. Junga, P. Chudy and J. Pospolita, Uncertainty estimation of the efficiency
of small-scale boilers, Measurement, 97 (2017), 186–194.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.11.011
[7] P. Basu, C. Kefa, L. Jestin, Boilers and Burners, Springer Science & Business
Media, 2012.
[8] M. C. Barma, R. Saidur, S. M. A. Rahman, A. Allouhi, B. A. Akash and S. M.
Sait, A review on boilers energy use, energy savings, and emissions reductions,
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 79 (2017), 970–983.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.187
[9] J. C. Campos Avella, E. Lora Figueroa and E. Quispe, Herramientas para la
implementación de un sistema de gestión integral de la energía en la industria
petrolera upstream y downstream.
[10] G. Valencia, E. Ramos and L. Meriño, Energy Planning for Gas Consumption
Reduction in a Hot Dip Galvanizing Plant, Chemical Engineering
Transactions, 57 (2017), 1-6.
[11] G. May, I. Barletta, B. Stahl, and M. Taisch, Energy management in
production: A novel method to develop key performance indicators for
improving energy efficiency, Appl. Energy, 149 (2015), 46–61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.065
[12] G. E. Valencia, Y. Cardenas, E. S. Ramos, A. Morales and J. C. Campos,
Energy Saving in Industrial Process Based on the Equivalent Production
Method to Calculate Energy Performance Indicators, Chemical Engineering
Transactions, 57 (2017), 709–714.
Received: September 12, 2017; Published: October 19, 2017