+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa...

Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa...

Date post: 28-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
“Real-world” low-carbon policy packages for the energy sector Christina Hood, Head, Environment and Climate Change Unit Workshop on Implementing real-world low-carbon policy packages in the energy sector: understanding the challenges Paris, 27 June 2017
Transcript
Page 1: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

“Real-world” low-carbon policy

packages for the energy sector

Christina Hood, Head, Environment and Climate Change Unit

Workshop on Implementing real-world low-carbon policy packages in the energy sector: understanding the challenges Paris, 27 June 2017

Page 2: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Power Generation

23%

Policy packages

A broad basket of policies is relevant for energy transition: policy overlaps and interactions need to be

taken into account for effective implementation

Carbon

Pricing

Energy

efficiency

support

Renewables support

Fossil fuel

phase-down

Air quality

regulations

Supporting markets and infrastructure

Page 3: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

… but real-world policymaking is more challenging!

A broad basket of policies is relevant for energy transition: policy overlaps and interactions need to be

taken into account for effective implementation

Page 4: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Many questions and issues remain challenging for governments

• What can low-to-moderate carbon prices achieve? When and how may they need to be complemented?

• How to manage trade-offs between policies that best support short, medium and long-term action?

• How best to align energy and climate policies among themselves, across jurisdictions, with other policy objectives (e.g. air quality, development)?

• Policy design options for particular political realities, such as concerns about

• Energy price rises

• Competitiveness

• Stranded assets

Page 5: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Carbon prices in IEA scenarios

Expected carbon prices are well below those needed in a 2C scenario

Region 2020 2030 2040

NPS

European Union 20 37 50

Chile 6 12 20

Republic of Korea 20 37 50

China 10 23 35

South Africa 7 15 24

Region 2020 2030 2040

NPS

European Union 20 37 50

Chile 6 12 20

Republic of Korea 20 37 50

China 10 23 35

South Africa 7 15 24

450 Scenario

United States and Canada 20 100 140

European Union 22 100 140

Japan 20 100 140

Republic of Korea 20 100 140

Australia and New Zealand 20 100 140

China, Russia, Brazil and South

Africa

10 75 125

Page 6: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

United Kingdom power generation: coal to gas switching

Moderate carbon prices (with shifts in relative fossil fuel prices) have supported coal to gas switching

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

€/tC

O2

Coal-to-GasSwitch Range

Prevailing UKCarbon Price

Prevailing EUCarbon Price

Average Coal-to-Gas Switch Price

Source: IEA, Energy, Environment and Climate Change: 2016 Insights

Page 7: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

What “modest” carbon prices can (and cannot) contribute

• Can:

- Lead to some fuel-switching in existing operations

- Make near-to-market low-carbon technologies cost-effective

- Backstop other low-carbon support policies

• Cannot:

- Drive all necessary low-carbon investment

- Force early retirement of high-carbon assets

- Give strong signal for electrification of heat and transport

- [Overcome non-price market barriers]

Page 8: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

The time dimension

Low-hanging fruit….

… or preparing for the long-term?

Page 9: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Optimising for the long term: support for technology development

Support for new technologies can lower carbon prices and total investment costs

Technology cost

Emission reductions

Conventional Technologies

New

Technology

(a)

Technology cost

Emission reductions

(b)

Page 10: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Tracking Clean Energy Progress www.iea.org/etp/tracking2017/

Page 11: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Another side of optimizing for the long term…

An early start may be necessary for new technologies to scale up at the rate needed

(a) (b)

Conventional

Technologies

New

Technology

Time Time

New

Technology

Conventional

Technologies

Emission

Reductions Emission

Reductions

2050 2050

Page 12: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Past IEA work on energy-climate policy interactions

Page 13: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

ETS: Supplementary policies can significantly impact prices

Page 14: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Alignment of a carbon price with existing energy policies

There are many questions for policymakers to consider in energy-climate policy alignment

Mapping

the energy

and climate

policy

landscape

Initial

alignment

of energy

policies and

the carbon

price

Integration

when

phasing-in

a carbon

price

Design to

maintain

alignment

over time

Insitutional co-ordination between climate and energy policymakers

Energy

policy and

carbon

pricing

policy

reviews

•Energy policies

•Policy objectives

•Policy performance

•Underpinning issues

(markets, infrastructure,

finance)

•Carbon price settings

•Adjust energy policies

•“Room to move”

•Effect of revenue

recycling

•Reference to actual or

shadow carbon price?

•Avoiding lock-in?

•Energy policy design for

greater certainty

•Stress-testing

•Flexible cap

•Efficiency vs simplicity

•How often ?

•Balancing certainty and

flexibility

•What would justify

intervention outside

scheduled reviews ?

•Which agencies?

•What levels of government?

•What structure for co-

ordination?

Page 15: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

IEA work programme on low carbon policy packages:

• Workshop 27 June

• Scoping report for release in October 2017

- Literature review on climate policy mixes and interactions

- Clarifying the role of carbon pricing in IEA World Energy Model

- Identify mitigation “gaps” with sustained moderate prices, with a focus on avoiding lock-in and understanding major path dependencies

- Canada case study: backstop national carbon price; interactions across jurisdictions and sectors

• 2018:

- Work on China policy mix: national ETS and regulated electricity markets. Secondee from NDRC China to work in IEA Environment and Climate Change Unit.

- ? India: low-carbon policy packages in the context of other policy objectives

- Longer publication in late 2018

Page 16: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Conclusions

How can IEA help policymakers deliver more

effective, realistic, and well-integrated low-carbon

climate and energy policies that take account of

local political realities?

Page 17: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

Thank you

[email protected]

Page 18: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Costs to society can be reduced through a package of policies including energy efficiency and

technology development and deployment, with carbon pricing as the cornerstone.

Carbon pricing is necessary but not sufficient

Price of CO2

€/tCO2e

MtCO2

Carbon price mediates

action economy-wide

Source: Summing up the Parts, 2011

Page 19: Energy sector resilience · Republic of KoreaRepublic of Korea 20 37 50 China 10 23 35 South Africa 7 15 24 Region 2020 2040 European Union 20 37 50 12 20 20 37 50 China 10 23 35

© IEA 2017

Costs to society can be reduced through a package of policies including energy efficiency and

technology development and deployment, with carbon pricing as the cornerstone.

Carbon pricing is necessary but not sufficient

Policies to unlock cost-

effective energy efficiency

potential that is blocked by

non-economic barriers

Technology support policies

to:

• reduce long-term costs

• Enable timely scale-up

Reduced long-

term marginal

abatement cost

Price of CO2

€/tCO2e

MtCO2

Carbon price mediates

action economy-wide

Source: Summing up the Parts, 2011

Infrastructure, Financing


Recommended