ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
1
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
OBJECTS SENSES OF ‘ENGINEERING ETHICS
VARIETY OF MORAL ISSUES
TYPES OF INQUIRY
MORAL DILEMMAS
MORAL AUTONOMY
KOHLBERG’S THEORY
GILLIGAN’S THEORY
CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY
MODELS OF PROFESSIONAL ROLES
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION
SELF – INTEREST, CUSTOMS AND
RELIGION
Customs and Ethical Relativism
Religion and Divine Command Ethics
USES OF ETHICAL THEORIES
SKILLS
Get a knowledge about the
system of moral principles
that apply to the practice of
engineering. The field
examines and sets the
obligations by engineers to
society, to their clients, and to
the profession. As a scholarly
discipline, it is closely related
to subjects such as the
philosophy of science, the
philosophy of engineering,
and the ethics of technology.
WHAT WOULD WE LEARN IN THIS CLASS… The goal of the course is to sensitize the students to
important ethics issues before you have to confront them.
The student will study important cases from the past so that
you will know what situations other engineers have faced
and will know what to do when similar situations arise in
your proffessional career.
Finally, will learn techniques for analyzing and resolving
ethical problems when they arise.
EDUCATION
In this class we will learn the types of transient test and what
the differents between them, we would learn more about
gravel packs and the near wellbore damages when they will
be happened and how to prevent them
Volunteer Experience or Leadership
A class presentation in Engineering Ethics at University of
Thi-Qar/College of Engineering/Petroleum& Gas
Engineering department.
References 1- Engineering Ethics Fourth Edition (CHARLES B.
FLEDDERMANN) 2012
2- Professional Ethics in Engineering Collection Editor:
William Frey.
3- Other
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
2
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
Contents SENSES OF ‘ENGINEERING ETHICS’ .........................................................................................................3
VARIETY OF MORAL ISSUES ...................................................................................................................4
TYPES OF INQUIRY .................................................................................................................................6
MORAL DILEMMAS .................................................................................................................................7
MORAL AUTONOMY ............................................................................................................................. 10
KOHLBERG’S THEORY .......................................................................................................................... 12
GILLIGAN’S THEORY ............................................................................................................................. 13
CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY ......................................................................................................... 15
MODELS OF PROFESSIONAL ROLES ...................................................................................................... 17
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION ........................................................................................................ 18
SELF – INTEREST, CUSTOMS AND RELIGION ......................................................................................... 19
Customs and Ethical Relativism ........................................................................................................... 20
Religion and Divine Command Ethics .................................................................................................. 23
USES OF ETHICAL THEORIES ................................................................................................................ 24
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
3
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
ENGINEERING ETHICS
SENSES OF ‘ENGINEERING ETHICS’
The word ethics has different meanings but they are correspondingly related to each other.
In connection with that, Engineering ethics has also various senses which are related to one
another.
Comparison of the senses of Ethics and Engineering Ethics
Ethics Engineering Ethics
1. Ethics is an activity which concerns
with making investigations and
knowing about moral values, finding
solutions to moral issues and justifying
moral issues and justifying moral
judgments.
1. Like the ethics, engineering ethics
also aims at knowing moral values
related to engineering, finding accurate
solutions to the moral problems in
engineering and justifying moral
judgments of engineering.
2. Ethics is a means of contrasting
moral questions from non-moral
problems.
2. Engineering Ethics gives a total view
of the moral problems and how to solve
these issues specifically related to
engineering field.
3. Ethics is also used as a means of
describing the beliefs, attitudes and
habits related to an individual‟s or
group‟s morality. Eg. : Ethics given in
the holly Quran or the Bible or the
Bhagavat Gita.
3. Engineering ethics is also using
some currently accepted codes and
standards which are to be followed by
group of engineers and engineering
societies.
4. As per the definition of dictionaries
– „moral principles‟ is about the
actions and principles of conduct of the
people. i.e. ethical or unethical.
4. Engineering ethics also concerns
with discovering moral principles such
as obligation, rights and ideals in
engineering and by applying them to
take a correct decision. From these
senses of Engineering ethics, one can
realize that it is the study of morality.
WHAT IS MORALITY?
The term „morality‟ concerns with (a) what ought or ought not to be done in a given situation, (b)
what is right or wrong in handling it, (c) what is good or bad about the persons, policies and
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
4
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
principles involved in it. If an action is said to be morally right or a principle is said to be morally
good, then they are said to be had some moral reasons in supporting it.
Moral reasons include respecting others and ourselves, respecting the rights of others, keeping
promises, avoiding unnecessary problems to others and avoiding cheating and dishonesty,
showing gratitude to others and encourage them to work. So, if an engineering decision is said to
be a good one, it has to meet out all the specifications. These specifications must be covered both
the technical and the moral specifications such as safety of the product, reliability, easy
maintenance and the product should be user-friendly with environment.
VARIETY OF MORAL ISSUES There are so many engineering disasters which are greater / heavier than the level of acceptable or
tolerable risk. Therefore, for finding and avoiding such cases such as nuclear plant accident at
Chernobyl (Russia), Chemical plant at Bhopal (India) where a big disaster of gas leakage,
occurred in 1980, which caused many fatal accidents. In the same way, oil spills from some oil
extraction plants (the Exxon Valdez plant), hazardous waste, pollution and other related services,
natural disasters like floods, earth quake and danger from using asbestos and plastics are some
more cases for engineering disasters. These fields should be given awareness of engineering
ethics. Hence, it is essential for engineers to get awareness on the above said disasters. They
should also know the importance of the system of engineering. When malfunction of the system is
a rapid one, the disaster will be in greater extent and can be noticed immediately. When they ate
slow and unobserved, the impact is delayed. So, the engineers should not ignore about the
functions of these systems. These cases also explain and make the engineers to be familiar with
the outline of the case in future and also about their related ethical issues.
Approaches to Engineering Ethics:
i. Micro-Ethics: This approach stresses more about some typical and everyday problems which
play an important role in the field of engineering and in the profession of an engineer.
ii. Macro-Ethics: This approach deals with all the social problems which are unknown and
suddenly burst out on a regional or national level. So, it is necessary for an engineer to pay
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
5
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
attention on both the approaches by having a careful study of how they affect them professionally
and personally.
The engineers have to tolerate themselves with the everyday problems both from personal and
societal point of view.
Where and How do Moral Problems arise in Engineering?
Any product or project has to undergo various stages such as planning, idea, design, and
manufacturing which is followed by testing, sales and services. This has to be done by engineers
of various branches like Civil, Mechanical, Electrical, Chemical etc. These engineers may be
grouped together as a team or they may be separated from each other with an interconnection or
co-ordination. Inspite of the engineers‟ full attention and care, sometimes the product or project
may be unsafe or less useful. This may be due to some reasons 1) The product or project may be
designed for early obsolescence or 2) due to under pressure because of running out of time,
budgetary etc or 3) by ignorance on the size of the project, or 4) because of the large number of a
products sold on the mass market, people may be affected.
Some cases with which different areas covered by engineering ethics:
1. An inspector finds a faulty part in the manufacture of a machine, which prevents the use of that
machine for a longer period. But his superior, takes this as a minor mistake and orders that the
faulty part to be adjusted so that the delay in the process has to be avoided. But the inspector
doesn‟t want this and so he is threatened by the supervisor.
2. An electronic company applies for a permit to start a Nuclear Power Plant. When the licensing
authority comes for visit, they enquire the company authorities on the emergency measures that
have been established for safety of the surroundings. The engineers inform them about the alarm
system and arrangements have been made in local hospitals for the treatment of their employees
and they have no plan for the surrounding people. They also inform that it is the responsibility of
the people.
3. A Yarn Dyeing company which dumps its wastes in the nearby river. It causes heavy damage to
the people those who are using the river. The plant engineers are aware of this, but they do not
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
6
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
change the disposal method because their competitors also doing similarly as it happens to be a
cheaper. They also say that it is the responsibility of the local government.
The above given examples clearly explain how the ethical problems arise most often because of
wrong judgments and expectations of engineers. These necessitate for establishing some codes of
conduct which has to be imposed on engineers‟ decisions on the basis of ethical view.
TYPES OF INQUIRY
Inquiry means an investigation. Like general ethics, Engineering ethics also involves
investigations into values, meaning and facts. These inquiries in the field of Engineering
ethics are of three types.
1. Normative Inquiries
2. Conceptual Inquiries
3. Factual or Descriptive Inquiries
Normative Inquiries
These inquiries are mostly helpful to identify the values which guide the individuals and groups in
taking a decision. These are meant for identifying and justifying some norms and standards of
morally desirable nature for guiding individuals as well as groups. In most of the cases, the
normative questions are given below:
1. How do the obligations of engineers protect the public safety in given situations?
2. When should an engineer have to alarm their employers on dangerous practices?
3. Where are the laws and organizational procedures that affect engineering practice on moral
issues?
4. Where are the moral rights essential for engineers to fulfill their professional obligations?
From these questions, it is clear that normative inquiries also have the theoretical goal of justifying
moral judgments.
Conceptual Inquiries
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
7
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
These are meant for describing the meaning of concepts, principles, and issues related to
Engineering Ethics. These inquiries also explain whether the concepts and ideas are expressed by
single word or by phrases. The following are some of the questions of conceptual inquiries:
1. What is the safety and how it is related to risk?
2. What does it mean when codes of ethics say engineers should protect the safety,
health and welfare of the public?
3. What is a „bribe‟?
4. What is a „profession‟ and „professional‟?
Factual / Descriptive Inquiries
These help to provide facts for understanding and finding solutions to value based issues. The
engineer has to conduct factual inquiries by using scientific techniques. These help to provide
information regarding the business realities such as engineering practice, history of engineering
profession, the effectiveness of professional societies in imposing moral conduct, the procedures
to be adopted when assessing risks and psychological profiles of engineers. The information about
these facts provide understanding and background conditions which create moral problems. These
facts are also helpful in solving moral problems by using alternative ways of solutions. These
types of inquiries are said to be complementary and interrelated. Suppose an engineer wants to tell
a wrong thing in an engineering practice to his superiors, he has to undergo all these inquiries and
prepare an analysis about the problem on the basis of moral values and issues attached to that
wrong thing. Then only he can convince his superior. Otherwise his judgment may be neglected or
rejected by his superior.
MORAL DILEMMAS Why study engineering ethics?
Engineering ethics is not only teaching moral behaviour in knowing about immoral and amoral in
a set of beliefs, but also increasing the ability of engineers and other professionals to face boldly
with the moral problems arising from technological advancements, changes and other related
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
8
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
activities. This can be possible be imparted among the engineers, only through college courses,
seminars, etc. which are involved individual study.
Moral Dilemmas
Dilemmas are certain kind of situations in which a difficult choice has to be made.
Moral dilemmas can also be called moral problems. Moral dilemmas have two or more foldings -
moral obligations, duties, rights, goods or ideals come into disagreement with each other. One
moral principle can have two or more conflicting applications for a particular given situation.
Moral dilemmas can be occurred in so many ways. For example, suppose one gives a promise to
his friend that he will meet him on the evening of a particular day, but unfortunately on the same
day his brother has met with an accident and he has to take him to hospital. The dilemma here
consists of a conflict between the duty to keep promise and obligations to his brother. In this
situation, to solve his moral problem, he can make a phone call to his friend and make apology for
his inability to come. So, from the above it is clear that the duty to keep promise always has two
different and conflicting applications.
The moral dilemmas cannot easily be addressed or resolved always. It requires an elaborate
searching which sometimes causing extreme suffering and reflection of a situation. The modern
engineering practice compels that all the engineers have to face boldly about the moral dilemmas
in their careers. To find a simple and clear solution to the moral problems in the field of
engineering, there must be some provision to allocate time to for learning ethics in engineering
courses. But at the same time, it should not be ignored in the following three categories of
complex and gloomy moral situations:
The Problem of Vagueness
The problem of vagueness is related to individuals. The individuals may not know how to moral
considerations or principles in resolving a moral problem at a particular situation. For example, an
engineer in a higher position of a company, is responsible and having the sole right to make
purchases on his own and behalf of the company. There may be many suppliers for supplying
materials. In this situation, a sales representative from one of the suppliers approaches him with a
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
9
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
moderating gift. In this case, the engineer may have some doubts like (i) Whether this is an
acceptance of a bribe? (ii) Does it create a conflict of interest? The solution is only with that
engineer. He can also discuss with his colleagues about the problem. The colleague may find the
solution on the basis of previous experiences, - it may not be a kind of bribe, but at the same time
it should not be encouraged in future because there is the possibility of supplying substandard
materials. It is difficult to arrive at the conclusion whether the gift is an innocent amenity or an
unacceptable bribe.
The problems of Conflicting reasons
These occur more frequently. In a difficult situation of a moral problem, an individual may clearly
know about what moral principle has to be applied to resolve the
problem. When it arises, there are two or more principles with clear solutions lead into conflict
with one another or one particular moral principle. Simultaneously there mcan be of two different
directions. In this case, that individual has to choose a better one among them on the basis of the
importance and the applicability. For example, an engineer has given a promise to his employer
and another one to a colleague. If it is difficult to fulfill both the promises, he can drop off one
promise which is of least importance. If he explains the situations to his colleagues, it can be
understood.
The problems of disagreement
The individuals and groups in engineering companies may disagree with resolving moral problems
in difficult situations. The disagreement will be normally about how to interpret, apply and
balance the moral problems. In this situation they have to use the following steps to resolve the
problems.
Steps / Procedures in facing / confronting moral dilemmas , All the above said three problems
pave the way for the need of several steps in resolving the moral dilemmas. All the steps are
interrelated and they can also be used jointly.
1) Identifying the relevant moral factors and reasons: i.e. Finding solutions for (i)
the conflicting responsibilities (ii) the competing rights and (iii) the clashing ideals involved.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
10
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
2) Collecting and gathering all the available facts which are relevant to the moral factors while
resolving.
3) Ranking the moral considerations or principles on the basis of importance as applicable to the
situation. But sometimes it is not possible when the objective is to find a way to meet equally
urgent responsibilities and to promote equally important ideals.
4) Considering alternative courses of action for resolving the problems and tracing the full
implications of each. i.e. conducting factual inquiries.
5) Having talked with the colleagues, friend about the problem getting their suggestions and
alternative ideas on resolving that dilemma and
6) Arriving at a careful and reasonable judgment or solution by taking into consideration of all
important moral factors and reasons on the basis of the facts or truths. But it seems to be difficult.
To conclude, only the study of Engineering Ethics can help in developing the skills and attitudes
to follow the above steps in resolving a moral problem among the engineers and other
professionals by means of case studies, class room discussions and debating.
MORAL AUTONOMY Meaning and Causes Autonomy means self-governing or self-determining i.e act independently.
Moral autonomy means the right or the wrong conduct which is of independent on ethical issues.
It deals with the improvement of an individual‟s moral thoughts which make h I to adopt good
habits. Moral autonomy is concerned with the independent attitude of a person related to ethical
issues. It helps to improve the self determination among the individuals.
The need for moral autonomy in the field of engineering ethics
The objectives of engineering ethics are not related to implanting particular moral beliefs on
engineers. In other way they help the engineers and other professionalists to strength their
professional values such as honesty, respect the colleagues and think for the welfare of the general
public. Though the above said values have been already in the minds of the engineers, engineering
ethics helps to improve these qualities in a better manner among the engineers, and not inculcating
newly. The structural objective of engineering ethics is to be enable the individuals to understand
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
11
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
the moral responsibilities in a clear and careful manner. So, the main aim of studying engineering
ethics is to increase the moral autonomy within him.
Moral autonomy is a skill and habit of thinking ethical problems in a rational manner. These
ethical issues are to be found out on the basis of moral problems. These general responsiveness of
moral values are derived only from the training what we have received as a child with response to
the sensitive and right of others and ourselves. Suppose the training is not given in the childhood
itself, those children may be ill - treated or neglected by the society. These children in future may
grow up with lack of senses on moral issues and they become as sociopaths. They are never
morally autonomous. They won‟t regret for their mistakes and wrong doings. These moral
concerns can be initiated or imparted among the engineers, mainly engineers of various subjects
and also by the way of their friends, or by social events occurring around them or by books and
movies. So the main aim of all the courses of Applied Ethics is only to improve their abilities in
order to face the moral issues critically. This can only be achieved by improving the practical
skills which are helping in producing effective independent or self-determination thoughts among
the individuals about the moral problems.
Skills for improving moral autonomy
1. The engineers must have the competence for identifying the moral problems and ethical issues
related to the field of engineering – they must have the ability to distinguish and relate these moral
problems with the problems of law, economics, religions principles etc.
They must possess the skills of understanding, clarifying and assessing the arguments which are
against the moral issues.
2. They must have the ability to suggest the solutions to moral issues, on the basis of facts. These
suggestions must be consistent and must include all the aspects of the problem.
3. They must have the imaginative skill to view the problems from all view points and also be able
to suggest a proper alternative solution.
4. They must be able to tolerate while giving moral judgments and decisions which may cause
trouble. i.e. they have to understand the difficulties in making moral decisions.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
12
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
5. They must have adequate knowledge and understanding about the use of ethical language so as
to defend or support their views with others.
6. They must have some better knowledge in understanding the importance of suggestions and
better solutions while resolving moral problems and also about the importance of tolerance on
some critical situations.
7. They must understand the importance of maintaining the moral honesty i.e. the personal
convictions and beliefs and individual‟s professional life must be integrated. They must have this
skill of doing so.
Conclusion
From the above decisions on moral autonomy, we can conclude that moral autonomy helps an
engineer to increase his moral outlook in an appreciable manner. It also helps him to be morally
responsible in his daily activities.
KOHLBERG’S THEORY Moral Autonomy is based on the psychology of moral development. The first psychological
theory was developed by Jean Piaget. On the basis of Piaget‟s theory, Lawrence kohlberg
developed three main levels of moral development which is based on the kinds of reasoning and
motivation adopted by individuals with regard to moral questions.
The Pre Conventional Level
It is nothing but self-centered attitude. In this level, right conduct is very essential for an
individual which directly benefits him. According to this level, individuals are motivated by their
willingness to avoid punishment, or by their desire to satisfy their own needs or by the influence
of the power exerted by them. This level is related to the moral development of children and some
adults who never want to go beyond a certain limit.
The Conventional Level
The level deals with the respect for conventional rules and authority. As per this level the rules
and norms of one‟s family or group or society has been accepted as the final standard of morality.
These conventions are regarded as correct, because they represent with authority. When
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
13
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
individuals are under this level, always want to please/satisfy others and also to meet the
expectations of the society and not their selfinterest.
Loyalty and close identification with others have been given much importance. No adult tries to
go beyond this level.
The Post Conventional Level
This level is said to be attained when an individual recognizes the right and the wrong on the basis
of a set of principles which governing rights and the general good which are not based on self-
interest or social conventions. These individuals are called “autonomous”, because they only think
for themselves and also they do not agree t hat customs are always correct. They want to live by
general principles which are universally applied to all people. They always want to maintain their
moral integrity, self-respect and the respect for other autonomous peoples.
Kohlberg‟s theory of moral development is very much related to the goals of studying ethics at
college level. To become morally responsible, an individual must be able and willing to undergo
with moral reasoning. Moral responsibility comes out of the foundation of early moral training
given by an individual‟s parents and culture. This early training helps to complete the above said
three levels of moral development by an individual. As per Kohlberg‟s view only few people
would reach the post conventional level which is based on assumption that movement towards
autonomous is morally desirable.
GILLIGAN’S THEORY Gilligan‟s argument
Caorl Gilligan was one of the students of Kohlberg. She criticizes Kohlberg‟s theory on the basis
of approached made by both male and female towards morality. On the basis of her studies and
researches, she criticizes Kohlberg‟s theory which is only based on male bias and his studies are
of typically male preoccupation with general rules and rights.
She also suggest that men are always more interested in resolving moral dilemmas by applying
some most important moral rules. But women always want to keep up the personal relationship
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
14
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
with all those involved in a situation and they always give attention only on the circumstances
responsible for that critical situation and not on general moral rules.
She also states that Kohlberg‟s theory is only on ethics of rules and rights. But her theory is
known as ethics of care. i.e. context oriented emphasis required to maintain the personal
relationship.
Levels of Moral Development
Gilligan recasts Kohlberg‟s three levels of moral development on the basis of her own studies of
women, as follows:
The Pre-Conventional Level
This is more over the same as Kohlberg‟s first level i.e. Right conduct is a selfish thing as solely
one what is good for oneself.
The Conventional Level
This level differs from Kohlberg‟s second level. According to her, women don‟t want to hurt
others and want to help others i.e. women always want to give up their interests in order to help
the others to fulfill their needs.
The Post Conventional Level
This level is also differed from Kohlberg‟s level. In this level, individual (particularly women)
want to balance between caring about other people and their interests. The main aim here is to
balance an individual‟s needs with those of others on
the basis of mutual caring. This can be achieved only through context –oriented reasoning and not
by abstract rules.
Heinz‟s Dilemma
Gilligan‟s criticism on the Kohlberg‟s theory can be made very clear with the help of a famous
example used by Kohlberg in his questionaries and interviews. This is called Heinz‟s Dilemma.
This example was about a woman and Heinz, her husband living in Europe. The woman was
affected by cancer. The doctors told her to use an expensive drug to save her life. The pharmacist
who also invented that medicine charged ten times the cost of making the drug. Besides his
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
15
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
poverty, Heinz took a lot of effort to borrow money, but he could get only half of the amount
needed. He approached to the pharmacist and begged him to sell the medicine at a cheaper price or
allow him to pay for it later. But the pharmacist refused to do so. Finally, without any hope, Heinz
forcibly entered into the pharmacy and stolen the drug. The question here is “Was the theft
morally right or wrong?”
By asking this question among the male, Kohlberg has received two sets of answers: One is based
on the conventional level i.e. Heinz did a wrong thing. Another one is based on the post
conventional level i.e,Heinz was correct as the life of the wife is more important than the property
right of the pharmacist.
But when the same question was asked among the women, they gave (all women) same answers.
They replied that Heinz was wrong. They further told that instead of stealing the medicine, Heinz
could have tried other alternative solutions. They also told that Heinz should have convinced still
the pharmacist to get the medicine.
From the above, Kohlberg concluded that women‟s decisions are always based on conventional
rule and they always have different opinions in applying the general moral rules and principles
about the right to live.
On the basis of the Kohlberg‟s comment on the women, Gilligan came to a different conclusion.
She tells that it shows greater sensitivity to people and personal relationships. She concluded that
the decision taken by women is context –oriented and not on the basis of general rules ranked
inorder of priority. Now, the question here is, how Gilligan‟s theory of moral development relates
to moral autonomy as a goal of studying ethics at the college level?
Autonomy requires independent reasoning on the basis of moral concern and not separated from
other people. As per Gilligan‟s theory and Kohlberg‟s theory, moral autonomy should be
consistent with context-oriented and also with an awareness of general moral principles and rights.
CONSENSUS AND CONTROVERSY
Consensus means „agreement‟ and „controversy‟ means disagreement. The consensus and the
controversies are playing the vital roles while considering the moral autonomy.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
16
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
When an individual exercises the moral autonomy, he cannot get the same results as others get in
applying moral autonomy. Surely there must be some moral differences i.e. the results or verdicts
will be of controversy. This kind of disagreements is unavoidable. These disagreements require
some tolerances among individuals those who are autonomous, reasonable and responsible.
As per the principle of tolerance, the goal of teaching engineering ethics is not merely producing
an agreed conformity on applying moral principles among engineers but also to reveal the ways of
promoting tolerances to apply moral autonomy.
Both the goals of engineering ethics and the goals of engineering courses have some similarities.
These similarities have to be extended with the help of exercising authority. For example, in the
class room, the teachers are having the authority over students and in the work place, the managers
are having the authority over engineers.
There are two general points regarding the relationship between autonomy and authority with
reference to the class room:
1) Moral autonomy and respect for the authority cannot be differentiated or separated from each
other. Moral autonomy is exercised on the basis of moral concern for other people and also
recognition of good moral reasons. Authority provides for the framework in which learning can
take place. It is based on the acceptance of authority by both the students and the professors.
Without this acceptance, the classes cannot be conducted in a smooth way. On the other hand,
cheating will be encouraged and the trust between faculty and the students may be reduced to
some extent. These kind of deviations are due to the absence of moral views and respect for
authority. They must be coincide with each other.
2) Generally a tension may arise among the individuals regarding the need for consensus about
authority and need for autonomy. This tension can be reduced by discussing openly regarding a
moral issue between students and faculty with the help of the authority.
In short, conflicts will arise between autonomy and authority, when the authority is misused. For
example, in small classes, the students are having the authority to express their own views. But
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
17
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
when the professor doesn‟t allow them to do so, he misuses his authority. This will create some
moral problems between the students and the faculty.
MODELS OF PROFESSIONAL ROLES The main aim of the profession of engineering is to improve the public safety, wealth and welfare.
In order to perform these functions, the engineer has to play various models to channalise his
attitudes towards the achievements of objectives. They are as follows:
1. Savior
The engineers are responsible for creating an utopian society in which everything is possible and
can be achieved without much effort – This can only be achieved through technological
developments made by the engineers for safeguarding the society from poverty, inefficiency,
waste and manual labour.
2. Guardian
Engineers only know the directions through which technology will be developed. So, they should
be given position of high authority based on their expertise skills in determining what is in the best
interests of the society. They should act as guardians to the technological improvements.
3. Bureaucratic Servant
Engineer‟s role in the management is to be the servant who receives and translates the directive of
management into better achievements. They have to solve the problems given by the management,
within the limits set by the management.
4. Social Servant
The role of engineers is not only providing service to others but also their responsibility to the
society. The interests of the society can be expressed to the engineers either directly or indirectly.
So, the engineers, with the co-operation of the management have the work of receiving society‟s
directives and satisfying the desires of the society.
5. Social enabler and Catalyst
The engineer has to play a role of creating a better society and should be the cause of making
social changes. Service given by the engineers to the society includes carrying out the social
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
18
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
directives. Engineers are needed to help the management and the society to understand their needs
and to create decisions about technological development.
6. Game Player
We cannot say that engineers are servants or masters of anyone. They are playing the economic
game rules which may be effective at a given time. Their aim is to play successfully within the
organization enjoying the happiness of technological work and the satisfaction of winning and
moving ahead in a completive world.
THEORIES ABOUT RIGHT ACTION
There are four types of theories on ethics, which help to create the fundamental principles of
obligation suitable and applicable to professional and personal conduct of a person in his everyday
life. These theories are essential for cause of right action and morality. They are:
1. “Golden mean” ethics (Aristotle, 384 – 322 B.C.). The best solution is achieved through
reason and logic and is a compromise or “golden mean” between extremes of excess and
deficiency. For example, in the case of the environment, the golden mean between the extremes of
neglect and exploitation might be protection.
Problem: Variability from one person to another in their powers of reasoning
and the difficulty in applying the theory to ethical problems.
2. “Rights – based” ethics (John Locke, 1632 – 1704). Every person is free and equal and has
the right to life, health, liberty and possessions (in effect prohibiting capital punishment, medical
charges, jails and income taxes).
Problem: One person‟s right may be in conflict with another‟s rights.
3. “Duty – based” ethics (Immanual Kant, 1724 – 1804). Each person has a duty to follow a
course of action that would be universally acceptable for everyone to follow without exception.
(Thus we would all be honest, kind, generous and peaceful).
Problem: Universal application of a rule can be harmful.
4. “Utilitarian” ethics (John Stuart Mill, 1806 – 1873). The best choice is that which produces
the maximum benefit for the greatest number of people (which could endanger minority rights).
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
19
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
Problem: Qualification of the benefits can be difficult. All these theories can be differentiated on
the basis of what they provide for moral concept, good results for all, duties and human rights.
SELF – INTEREST, CUSTOMS AND RELIGION Moral justifications and principles form a distinct category of value, which are different from
other category of values. This can be more clear by relating and contrasting moral values to three
other types of values namely self-interest, customs and religion. Focus must be made in each case,
how we can reduce morality to these types of value.
Self –Interest and Ethical Egoism
Self-interest is nothing but one‟s personal good. It refers to the goodness of oneself in the long
run.
Each of the ethical theories recognizes the importance of self-respect. Utilitarian considers one‟s
own good as well as the good of others. Duty ethicists stresses duties to ourselves and for won
well-being. Ethicists of rights emphasize our rights to pursue our own good. Virtue ethicists accent
the importance of self – respect.
Each of these theories insists that the pursuit of self – interest must be balanced and kept under
control by moral responsibilities to other people. Now let us consider a view called “ethical
Egoism” which challenges all the ethical theories and it tries to reduce morality to the pursuit of
self-interest. It is called „egoism‟, because it says that the main duty of us is to maximize our own
good. According to Thomas Hobbes and Any Rand, moral values are reduced to concern for
oneself but always a rational concern which requires consideration of a person‟s long-term
interests.
The Supporters of ethical egoism make a differentiation between narrower and wider forms of
self-interest. When a person who selfishly preoccupies his own private good and disregard for the
good of others, will be off from rewarding friendships and love. Personal well-being generally
requires taking some large interest in others. But the rational egoist insists that the only reason for
showing an interest in others is for the sake of oneself.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
20
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
Ethical Egoists try to protect their positions by arguing that an ironic importance of everyone
rationally pursuing one‟s self-interest is that every one get benefited. The society benefits mostly
when (i) individuals pursue their private good and (ii) corporations pursue maximum profits in a
competitive free market. The main idea here is that leads to the improvement of economy through
which benefiting everyone.
Because, both the individual and the corporation know very well that what is good for them and
how best to pursue that good.
As per ethical egoism, people should always and only pursue their self – interest in a very cautious
manner to value the interest rationally on the basis of facts.
Morality essentially needs a willingness on the part of both individuals and corporations to place
some restrictions on the pursuit of private self – interests.
Accepting these constraints is presupposed in what is meant by moral concern Engineering Ethics
also has one task of exhibiting the moral limits on the pursuit of self interest in the Engineering
profession.
The above said remarks do not constitute a wrong proof for ethical egoism.
Morality stresses that we have to give value and we are concerned for the good of other
people. Ethical egoism is not a persuasive or probable theory to state what is morality but it is only
a convinced rejection of morality.
Customs and Ethical Relativism As we live in a society which is of increasingly diverse nature, it is more important to have
tolerance for various customs and outlooks. Hence the concept of ethical pluralism emerges. It
views that there may be alternative moral attitudes that are reasonable. But none of the moral
perspectives can be accepted completely by all the rational and the morally concerned persons.
Ethical pluralism allows the customs which plays an important role in deciding how we should
act. Moral values are many, varied and flexible. So, these moral values allow considerable
variation in how different individuals and groups understand and apply them in their day-today
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
21
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
activities. In other words, to be precise, reasonable persons always have reasonable disagreement
on moral issues, including issues in engineering ethics.
Ethical Relativism, an objectionable view, should not be confused with Ethical Pluralism. As per
Ethical relativism says that actions are morally right when they are approved by law or custom and
they are said to be wrong when they violate laws or customs. Ethical relativism tries to reduce
moral values to laws, conventions and customs of societies.
What is the necessary for a person to accept ethical relativism? There are somany reasons for
accepting ethical relativism –
I. The laws and customs seem to be definite, real and clear – cut. They help to reduce the endless
disputes about right and wrong. Moreover, laws seem to be an objective way to approach values.
The above argument is some what weak. This reason underestimates the extent to which ordinary
moral reasons are sufficiently objective to make possible criticism of individual prejudice and
bias. Moreover,
moral reasons allow objective criticism of the given laws as morally inadequate.
For example, the apartheid laws (racial segregation) in south Africa. This law violated the human
rights are not given any legal protections to the majority of the blacks, but morally ought to be.
II. The second reason for accepting ethical relativism is because it believes the values are
subjective at the cultural level. They also state that the moral standards are varied from one culture
to another. The only kind of objectivity is relative to a given set of laws in a given society. This
relativity of morality encourages the virtue of tolerance of difference among societies. The above
said argument is also confusing one. It assumes that ethical relativism is implied by descriptive
relativism. i.e., values and beliefs differ from culture to culture. There is nothing self-certifying
about the laws and beliefs. This can be explained by the following illustration. Ethical relativism
would allow that Hitler and his followers (Nazis) acted correctly when they killed 6 million Jews,
for their laws, customs, and beliefs which were based on anti – Semitism (hostile to Jews).
So, ethical relativism refers anything but for the tolerant doctrine it pretends to be.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
22
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
But there is nothing tolerant in accepting Nazi beliefs about morality Admitting intolerant anti-
semitic beliefs is not an act of tolerance. The supporters of ethical relativism, generally say that an
action is right “for cultures” when believe it as the right one.i.e., it is right “for them” though not
“for us”. So, beliefs, however customary or widely shared, are not self-certifying whether we are
talking about moral beliefs or scientific beliefs.
The third reason is based on the moral relationalism or moral contextulaism. This states that moral
judgments must be made in relation to some factors which varies from case to case. Making
simple and absolute rules are impossible in this way. In most of the cases, customs and laws are
considered as morally important factors for making judgments.
All philosophers accepted this moral relationalism. But contemporary duty and right ethicists like
„Kant‟ do not accept. As per their views, respecting people require some sensitiveness to special
circumstances. The virtue ethicists stress the role of practical wisdom in identifying the facts
which are relevant to assessment of conduct based on virtual manner.
The ethical relativism was accepted by early cultural anthropologists because they had a specified
tendency to overstress the scope of moral difference between cultures. Absorbed with unusual
practices such as head – hunting, human sacrifices and cannibolism (cannibal is a person who eats
human flesh); these persons who shifted their idea quickly form moral views differ greatly to
“Morality is a simply a culture as such”. But modern anthropologists states that all cultures by v
irtual show some
commitment to promote social co-operation and protect their members against needless
death and suffering. Moral differences are based only on the circumstances and facts, not on the
difference in moral attitudes. For example, we can consider the practice of human sacrifice in the
Aztecs. [Members of a former Indian people who ruled Mexico before the 16 th century]. This
practice seems to be a sign of cruelty an lack of concern for life. But a full examination of their
beliefs reveal that they believed their gods are pleased by such sacrifice to ensure the survival of
their people and also it was considered an honour for the victims. Refer to the sacrifice or placing
chicken and goal to god.
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
23
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
Religion and Divine Command Ethics
Moral responsibilities and religious belief are interwined in many positive ways.
First, they are related historically. Our moral views have been shaped by the most known central
moral values within the major world religions. For example, Islam has been having a great
influence in middle east countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq etc. the Judeo-
Christian tradition has been influential in Western countries like England, USA etc. Confucianism
has been influential in China and Buddhism, Hinduism and Taoism have been famous in Asian
countries.
Second, most of the people still having beliefs and show some important and inevitable
psychological connections between their moral and religious beliefs. Religious views frequently
support moral responsibility by providing additional motivation for being moral. Faith in
Religions or religious hopes imply trust. This trust gives an inspiration to be moral.
The main social functions of religion is motivating right action based on ethical principles.
Religion supports many people to follow their beliefs and promote tolerance and moral concern
for others. Many of the engineers are motivated by the religious beliefs.
Thirdly, religions form a set of higher moral standards. For example, Islam suggests for loving
neighbors. Many religions include virtue ethics that stresses about particular virtues. For example,
the ethics if Christianity focuses in the virtue of hope, faith and love. Buddhism emphasizes a
feeling of pity (compassion).
Some times, religious set standards below the level of acceptable moral standards, In this situation
the conflict is not only between secular morality and religion but also among other religions.
By giving stress on the positive connections between secular morality and religion, we go for
defining Divine Command ethics. It views that right action is defined by the commands of God,
and without a belief in God there could be no moral values and if an action is said to be wrong, it
means that it is forbidden by God.
The Major difficulties in Divine Command ethics are: how to know what God‟s commands are
and whether God exists or not. Islam, Christianity, Judaism and
ENGINEERING ETHICS Dr. Abdullah K. Okab
Ph.D. Petroleum and Gas Engineering
24
Un
ive
rsity
of T
hiq
ar/C
olle
ge
of E
ng
ine
erin
g/ P
etro
leu
m a
nd
Ga
s En
gin
ee
ring
De
pa
rtem
en
t/ 4th
Cla
ss
Hinduism are mostly God-centered i.e., they believe in God. But some other religions such as
Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism calls for only faith in a right path from
which code of ethics can be derived. For example in Buddhism the right path included
eight steps such as right understanding, right intention, right intention, right action, right
livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration.
Questions on the belief in God were rejected by most of he theologians, [Theology – study of
God] based on the question asked by Socrates. Socrates asked why does god make certain
commands and not others? Are these commands made on the basis of sudden fancy? The answer
is surely no. Because God is supposed to be morally good and He never commands bad acts such
as irresponsible killing, rapes, tortures and other immoralities.
Suppose a man claimed that God commands him to kill people randomly without making any
religious inquiry, we can say that the main is mistaken.
Divine Command ethics has things backwards. A morally divine being commands on the basis of
moral reasons which determines the wrongness of actions and rightness of other actions. Moral
reasons are presupposed as the foundation for making certain commands. Moral reasons can not
force hard to religious matters. Religious beliefs provides an added inspiration for responding to
moral reasons.
USES OF ETHICAL THEORIES Ethical theories have so many uses. Out of them, the following three are the most important uses:
1. Understanding moral dilemmas.
2. Justifying professional obligations and ideas and
3. Relating ordinary and professional morality