+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: jason-wilkins
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
25
Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs TEAM 12 - SUPER TANK
Transcript
Page 1: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs

TEAM 12 - SUPER TANK

Page 2: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

OVERVIEW

Project Refresher

A Basic Question

An Ethical Look (Qualitative)

Environmental (Quantitative)

A Personal Perspective

Page 3: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

PROJECT REFRESHER

Long Range Vehicle (Tank) Control over wireless network

Operate from anywhere in the world (Website/Android App)

Collaboration with HKUST

Shared Server

Customizable for new vehicle features

Page 4: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

PSSCS

An ability to send/receive/decode commands from a controller wirelessly

An ability to control direction/firing capability of a vehicle

An ability to autonomously avoid obstacles encountered by the tank

An ability to provide sensor feedback to a wireless controller

An ability to monitor a battery and prevent unexpected signal loss by alerting operator

Page 5: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

A BASIC QUESTION

SUPER TANK

Me

?

Page 6: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ETHICAL QUESTIONS?

NONE!

Page 7: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ETHICAL QUESTIONS

Will this be used to hurt anyone?

How secure does it have to be? Can it be hacked by terrorists?

Who should we allow to use SUPER TANK?

Etc..

Not the focus of this analysis.

INDUSTRIAL CASE - We’ll assume DARPA hired us for honest reasons to deploy the SUPER TANK

RESIDENTIAL CASE – We’ll assume we are producing a toy.

Page 8: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ETHICAL IMPACT

How thoroughly tested should this be?

What regulations should we comply with?

Where should we add warning Labels?

User manual cautions?

Should we add any additional safety mechanisms?

Page 9: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ETHICAL IMPACT

What regulations should we comply with?

It should be FCC Class B compliant.

How thoroughly tested should this be?

All FCC Class B features

Potential injury from cannon

External pinch points of motors

Reliability of all functions related to PSSCs

Page 10: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ETHICAL IMPACT

Where should we add warning Labels?

If cannon can injure: On chasis

User manual cautions?

If cannon can injure

Should we add any additional safety mechanisms?

Physical safe gaurds against motor pinch points

Page 11: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT?

Page 12: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CONSTRAINTS

We are in the Residential market space

No evaluation of Network

Just Purdue’s Vehicle

Page 13: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

SUPER TANK

Halo Tank

?

Page 14: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

SUPER TANK

Me

?

Page 15: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT – COSTS

Cost Lifecycle Stage Harsnhess Description/RationalePlastic Manufacturing Manufacturing Low Plastic takes energy and resources to be manufacturedElectronics Manufacturing High Very energy intensive to make ICs! Estimates from 280kWh/Kg to MWh's/KgBattery Manufacturing High Uses many hazardous chemicals such as CadmiumOverall Construction Low In the grand scheme of things, this construction is trivialElectricity Consumption In Use High Uses ~MWh throughout its useful lifetimeQuiescent Power Low The vehicle will tend to be active when on.PCB Recycle End of Life High This PCB is very specific to our SUPER TANK. It would be hard to re-usePandaboard Recycle Low If done properly, the Pandaboard can be reusedBattery Recycle High Recycling of batteries again require's use of hazardous chemicalsOther Recycling Low Our other components are mostly plastic, they canbe melted and re-used easilyPotential Throw Away High If these materals get thrown away they are non-bodegradable and potentially hazardous

Cost Lifecycle Stage Harsnhess Description/RationalePlastic Manufacturing Manufacturing Low Plastic takes energy and resources to be manufacturedElectronics Manufacturing High Very energy intensive to make ICs! Estimates from 280kWh/Kg to MWh's/KgBattery Manufacturing High Uses many hazardous chemicals such as CadmiumOverall Construction Low In the grand scheme of things, this construction is trivialElectricity Consumption In Use High Uses ~MWh throughout its useful lifetimeQuiescent Power Low The vehicle will tend to be active when on.PCB Recycle End of Life High This PCB is very specific to our SUPER TANK. It would be hard to re-usePandaboard Recycle Low If done properly, the Pandaboard can be reusedBattery Recycle High Recycling of batteries again require's use of hazardous chemicalsOther Recycling Low Our other components are mostly plastic, they canbe melted and re-used easilyPotential Throw Away High If these materals get thrown away they are non-bodegradable and potentially hazardous

Page 16: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

Cost Lifecycle Stage Harsnhess Description/RationalePlastic Manufacturing Manufacturing Low Plastic takes energy and resources to be manufacturedElectronics Manufacturing High Very energy intensive to make ICs! Estimates from 280kWh/Kg to MWh's/KgBattery Manufacturing High Uses many hazardous chemicals such as CadmiumOverall Construction Low In the grand scheme of things, this construction is trivialElectricity Consumption In Use High Uses ~MWh throughout its useful lifetimeQuiescent Power Low The vehicle will tend to be active when on.PCB Recycle End of Life High This PCB is very specific to our SUPER TANK. It would be hard to re-usePandaboard Recycle Low If done properly, the Pandaboard can be reusedBattery Recycle High Recycling of batteries again require's use of hazardous chemicalsOther Recycling Low Our other components are mostly plastic, they canbe melted and re-used easilyPotential Throw Away High If these materals get thrown away they are non-bodegradable and potentially hazardous

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT – MITIGATIONS

Proper Labeling and Documentation

Page 17: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

SUPER TANKS - CARBON FOOTPRINT

Component Amount Rate Cost (Ton CO2) Ref Comments

Packaging 4Kg 6kG/kG of plastic 0.0264 Packaging ReportDerived from 10lb estimate of total weight, and 2 pound estimate of electrical component weight

Electrical Components 1Kg 2800kWh/Kg 1.8284 Packaging ReportDerived from 10lb estimate of total weight, and 2 pound estimate of electrical component weight

Electricity Use 866kWh 1.306lb/kWh 0.565498

Reliability Analysis, Design Constraint Analysis

2 Years MTTF (Reliability) -> 2 Years @ 39.3 W = (39.3*22039.1)Wh = 866kWh

Total 2.4203

Super Tank's Carbon Footprint

Page 18: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

HALO TANKS - CARBON FOOTPRINT

Halo Tank

Page 19: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

HALO TANKS - CARBON FOOTPRINT

About (2/5)ths that of SUPER TANK

Component Amount Rate Cost (Ton CO2) Ref Comments

Packaging 0.5 6kG/kG of plastic 0.0033 Packaging ReportDerived from 10lb estimate of total weight, and 2 pound estimate of electrical component weight

Electrical Components 0.5 2800kWh/Kg 0.9142 Packaging ReportDerived from 10lb estimate of total weight, and 2 pound estimate of electrical component weight

Electricity Use 242kWh 1.306lb/kWh 0.158026

Reliability Analysis, Design Constraint Analysis

1 Years MTTF (estimate) -> 1 Years @ 22.0 W = (22.0*11020)Wh = 242kWh

Total 1.07553

Halo Tank's Carbon Footprint

Page 20: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

SUPER TANK

Halo Tank

?>

Page 21: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

MY PERSONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT

Conversation.org -> 14.7 Tons CO2/year

EPA.gov -> 16.0 Tons CO2/year

Averaged is 15.35 Tons CO2/year

Page 22: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

MY PERSONAL CARBON FOOTPRINT

Estimate I will live to be 85.

Estimate my standard of living will increase at 3% per year

Estimate standards of living are proportional to your Carbon Footprint.

15.35 ∑(1.03)^nn = 0

62

= 2783 Tons CO21 Matt =~ 1000 Super Tanks

Page 23: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

SUPER TANK

Me

<<2783 Tons CO22.42 Tons CO2

Page 24: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

SUPER TANK

Me

<1.21 Tons/Year 15.35 Tons/Year

Page 25: Environmental and Ethical Analysis: The True Costs T EAM 12 - SUPER TANK.

QUESTIONS?


Recommended