Environmental Policy in thePhilippines Related to RoadTransportation
Crispin Emmanuel D.Diaz
National Center for Transportation Studies
University of the Philippines – Diliman
Perceptions on Environment
Road Side Air Environment 16.3%
Congestion 24.9%
Structure 28.8%
Greenery 27.8%
Noise 10.6%
Ave. 21.7%
In-Vehicle Fee 12.3% Congestion 7.0%
Frequency 18.8%
Temperature 15.8%
Ave. 13.5%
Residence Air Environment 53.8%
Amenity 46.2%
Peace 68.4%
Community 72.6%
Noise 48.7%
Ave. 59.0%
Based on a JSPS study, percentage of those who expressed satisfaction with various aspects of environment in Metro Manila -- low values indicate dissatisfaction with roadside and in-vehicle conditions
» Low level of satisfaction indicates people are hoping for improvement!
» SPM reduction is one focus
Same study showed correlation of level of dissatisfactionwith SPM levels
Current Practices inAutomobile Inspectionn Motor vehicle inspection in the Philippines
focused mainly on the provision of safety devices;pollution was not the main concern
n Until early 2001, only 4 Motor VehicleInspection Systems (MVIS) were operational thePhilippines
n Because of low capacity, only vehicles older than5 years were inspected, and mostly taxis. Privatevehicles were not covered.
n At the moment, no comprehensive inspectionsystems are operational
Vehicle TaxStructure
Vehicle age and Vehicle tax levelsVehicle age and Vehicle tax levelsin Philippinesin Philippines
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1Å3̀ 4 5 6Å`
vehicle age (year)
Veh
icle
tax
lev
el (peso)
Å1̀600cc 1601Å2̀800 2801Å` Utility
• Tax system indifferentto or even promotesolder vehicles•Earmarked systeminstituted but not yetdisbursed (starts in 2002)•Funds allocation:
–80%National–7.5% Vehiclepollution control–7.5% Safety–5%Province andCities
Other policy aspectsn Conflict between the fare regulation and
being able to cover the cost of vehiclemaintenancen No subsidies for privately-owned public
transport (and no government company)
n Roadside testing of smoke-belchers ishaving some impact on getting compliance
Transport policy and correspondingsimulation system settings
Set emission rates to Tokyo’s levelAutomobile Inspection
Reduction of OD flows to MakatiCBD by 20%
Entry regulation
Assignment of the outermost lane asexclusive lane
Exclusive bus and jeepney lanes
Reduction of jeepney and busemission by 80%
Installation of SPM filters
Simulation System Settings(in Paramics)
Transportation Policy
Source: Yai, Iwakura, Vergel – 4th JSPS Workshop on Impact Analysis of Metropolitan PoliciesFor Development and Environmental Conservation in the Philippines, Nov 20-21, 2001
Simulated Results of Different Policies
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Base SPM filter Exclusivelanes
EntryRegulation
AutoInspection
MorningOff-peak
Source: Yai, Iwakura, Vergel – 4th JSPS Workshop on Impact Analysis of Metropolitan PoliciesFor Development and Environmental Conservation in the Philippines, Nov 20-21, 2001
Auto inspectionhas biggestimpact!
SPM
con
cent
ratio
n [µ
g/m
3 ]
Clean Air Act (CAA)n RA No. 8749, passed in 1998
n Provides for Air Quality Management thru:n Setting of ambient air quality guidelines and
standards - for monitoring
n Emission limits for motor vehicles (effectiveby 2003) - linked to registration
n Regulation of importation of motor vehiclesand engines to comply with emission limits
CAA National Ambient Air QualityGuidelines for Criteria Pollutants*
1 hour
8 hours
0.07
0.03
140
60
Photochemicaloxidants such asOzone
1 year1.03 months1.5Pb
1 hour
8 hours
30
9
35 mg/Ncm
10 mg/Ncm
CO
24 hours0.08150NO2
1 year0.038024 hours0.07180SO2
1 year6024 hours150PM-10
1 year9024 hours230TSP
SPM
AveragingTime
ppmM g/m3AveragingTime
ppmM g/m3
Long TermShort TermPollutants
Ambient Air Quality in Metro ManilaConcentration Stations Min-Max Average
Good 0-80
Fair 81-230
Unhealthy 231-349
Very Unhealthy 350-599
Absolutely Unhealthy 600-899
Emergency 900 above
Total Samples
Valenzuela 118-295 213.96
20 8 28
Congressional 187-921 358.74
2 8 7 1 1 19
Makati 73-229 129.21
2 20 22
East Avenue 92-277 168.66
29 4 33
Pag-Asa 30-237 89
9 9 1 19
EDSA-DPWH 119-398 215.2
16 8 1 25
Ateneo 45-167 85.7
13 11 24
Las Piñas 25-199 90.38
13 16 29
Mandaluyong 123-203 147
8 8
Pasig 85-158 129.2
10 10
» Few sites, Limited data» Very unhealthy conditions observed
Emission Limits for Type ApprovalCO HC+NOx PM(g/km) (g/km) (g/km)2.72 0.97 0.14
Light Vehicles
Light CommercialVehicles
Reference Weight CO HC+NOx PM(kg) (g/km) (g/km) (g/km)
Category 1 1250<RW 2.72 0.97 0.14Category 2 1250 < RW < 1700 5.17 1.4 0.19Category 3 RW <1700 6.9 1.7 0.25
CO HC NOx PM(g/kWh) (g/kWh) (g/kWh) (g/kWh)4.5 1.1 8 0.36
Heavy DutyVehicles
Public Information and Educationaccording to CAAn participation of the private sector including NGO and
private organizations, academe, environmental groupsand other private entities
n Awareness campaign focus :n the harmful impact of gas emissionn the technological options availablen the commitment of the government to fully enforce
emission standards through strengthening of apprehensionactivities.
n advertising industry, broadcasting industry and printmedia shall participate in public awareness raisingcampaigns (with no profit)
Air Quality Action Plann Prepared by ADB
n Issues tackled:n Mitigate air pollution from mobile sources
n Establish a motor vehicle inspection and emission testingsystem (MVIETS) -- includes sealing
n Strengthen vehicle emission enforcement capability
n Enhance information technology capabilities
n Implement capacity building for MVIETS
n Public awareness campaigns
Air Quality Action Plan (2)n Reduce emissions from vehicular use
n Introduce emission technology measures
nReview import of second hand vehicles andengines
nAge limitation for public transportationvehicles
Air Quality Action Plan (3)n Reduce traffic congestion and improve
traffic flownEstablish transport policies to improve
future accessibility and minimizecongestion
n Increase road capacity
nEnsure proper integration of land use anddevelopment and transport provision
n Improve transport planning process