EURISOL DS: European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility

EURISOL DS:

European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam

Facility

Design Study

NuPECC meeting, Venice 18-19 March, 05

G. Fortuna, Venice March 05

Design Study


THE GOAL:

Producing an engineering oriented study

of the EURISOL Facility and developing prototypes

of the most critical parts of the facility itself.

“Starting point: EURISOL RTD Recommendations”

IDENTITY CARDIDENTITY CARD

EC CONTRIBUTION:EC CONTRIBUTION: ((k€)k€) 9161.99161.9 - FTE 113,25 (p*y)- FTE 113,25 (p*y)

TASKS:TASKS: 1+11 1+11 (MANAGEMENT + FOUR TOPIC AREAS)

PARTICIPANTS:PARTICIPANTS: 20 20 (15 countries involved)(15 countries involved)GANIL (F), CNRS/IN2P3 (F), INFN (I), CERN (UE), UCL (B), CEA (F), NIPNE (RO), JYU (FI), LMU (G), FZJ (G), FI (LT), UW (PL), SAS (SK), U- LIVERPOOL (UK), GSI (G), USDC (E), CCLRC (UK), PSI (CH), IPUL (LV), SU MSL (SE)

PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL EFFORTS:PROJECT ESTIMATED TOTAL EFFORTS: ((k€)k€) 32.284,3 32.284,3 - FTE 490,45 - FTE 490,45 ( p*y)( p*y)

DURATION OF THE PROJECT:DURATION OF THE PROJECT: 48 MONTHS48 MONTHS

STARTING DATE:STARTING DATE: FEBRUARY 1st, 2005 FEBRUARY 1st, 2005

COORDINATING INSTITUTION:COORDINATING INSTITUTION: GANIL (F)GANIL (F)

CONTRIBUTORS: 20 (12 countries involved from Europe, Asia and North America)U-FRANKFURT (G), BUDKER (RU) ,VNIIFT (RU), PNPI (RU), ORNL (USA), ANL (USA), KAERI (SKR), TRIUMF (CA),

JAERI (JP), SOREQ (IL), U-MAINZ (G), VINCA (YU), KVI (NL), U-SURREY (UK), U-YORK (UK), U-PAISLEY (UK), U-UPPSALA (SE), NSCL (USA), FNAL (USA), HUG (CH)

Design Study


FEBRUARY, 1st 2005FEBRUARY, 1st 2005PROJECT STARTING DATEPROJECT STARTING DATE

FEBRUARY, 2-3, 2005FEBRUARY, 2-3, 2005 KICK-OFF MEETINGSKICK-OFF MEETINGS

FEBRUARY, 25TH, 2005FEBRUARY, 25TH, 2005 END OF NEGOTIATION PHASE, CONTRACT IN PREPARATIONEND OF NEGOTIATION PHASE, CONTRACT IN PREPARATION

MARCH/APRIL 2005MARCH/APRIL 2005ESTIMATED PERIOD OF CONTRACT SIGNATURE ( ESTIMATED PERIOD OF CONTRACT SIGNATURE (

GANIL/EC )GANIL/EC )

MAY/JUNE 2005MAY/JUNE 2005ESTIMATED PERIOD OF UE PRE-FINANCING ESTIMATED PERIOD OF UE PRE-FINANCING

Design Study


EURISOL.DS MILESTONES OF THIS SEMESTEREURISOL.DS MILESTONES OF THIS SEMESTER

0

CONTRACT SIGNATURE TIMETABLE

CONTRACT

SENT TO GANIL

10 35

CONTRACT

RETURN TO EC

CONTRACT

SIGNED BY EC

DAYS

ACCESS TO THE CONTRACT BY PARTICIPANTS ( 45 DAYS)

75

PRE-FINANCING PAYMENT TO GANIL

(45 DAYS)

95

BANK TRASFER TO THE PARTICIPANT

Design Study

Design Study


PROJECT ACTIVITIESPROJECT ACTIVITIES

4 TOPIC AREAS

EURISOL DS MANAGEMENT (GANIL/INFN-LNL/CNRS-IN2P3/CERN)

1 Targets and ion sources (Synergies with neutron spallation sources and neutrino facilities)

– Multi-MW target station : liquid- mercury converter (CERN) – Direct target : Several target-ion source systems (CERN) – Fission target : UCx target optimization (INFN-LNL)

2 Accelerators (Synergies with HIPPI (CARE))– Proton accelerator design: the driver (INFN-LNL): – Heavy ion accelerator design: the post accelerator (GANIL)– SC cavity development: cavity prototypes and multipurpose cryomodule

(CNRS-IN2P3/IPNO)

3 Physics, beams and safety (Synergies with EURONS)– Physics and instrumentation: conceptual design of novel instruments (U-

LIVERPOOL)– Beam intensity calculations: yield optimization of RIB species (GSI)– Safety and radioprotection: radiation fields, activation, shielding, handling,

storage, conformity to legislation (CEA)

4 Beta-Beams Aspects (Synergies with BENE (CARE), EURONS)– Beam preparation : breeders, 60 GHz ECR source (JYV) – Beta-beam aspects: conceptual design report of the Beta-Beam facility. It

includes preliminary studies on modifications of CERN accelerators in case the facility is sited at CERN ( CERN)

Design Study


Design Study


TASK LEADERS PER COUNTRY

3

33

1

11

France

I taly

Switzerland

Finland

United Kingdom

Germany

Design Study


4 4

9

13 13

8

5

3

9

15

9 9

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Man

agem

ent

Mul

ti M

W T

arge

t Sta

tion

Direct

Tar

get

Fiss

ion

Targ

et

Safet

y& R

adio

prot

ectio

n

Heavy

Ion

Accel

erat

or D

esig

n

Proto

n Acc

eler

ator

Des

ign

SC Cav

ity D

evel

opm

ent

Beam

Pre

para

tion

Physi

cs a

nd In

stru

men

tatio

n

Beam

Inte

nsity

Cal

cula

tions

Beta

Beam

s Asp

ects

Participants and Contributors per task

Design Study


566.4

828.0 890.0 887.0

697.5784.0

356.0

1,257.0

750.0

500.0636.0

1,010.0

0.0

200.0

400.0

600.0

800.0

1,000.0

1,200.0

1,400.0

EC CONTRI BUTI ON PER TASK (kEuro)

Design Study


3.004,9

1.428,5

1.181,5

1.827,0

578,5

103,5239,0 237,5

28,5 74,5 81,5 161,562,5 52,5 100,5

0,0

500,0

1.000,0

1.500,0

2.000,0

2.500,0

3.000,0

3.500,0EC contribution per Country (kEuro)

11

8

6

9

3

1

2

4

1

3 3

2

1

2 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12 No. OF TASKS PER COUNTRY Design Study

1.303,8

1.182,0

786,0 790,8

120,068,4

302,4370,8

108,0156,0

264,0212,4

18,0

168,0

34,8

0,0

200,0

400,0

600,0

800,0

1.000,0

1.200,0

1.400,0

FTE PER COUNTRY (PERSON MONTHS)Design Study

Design Study


ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION

STEERING COMMITTEESTEERING COMMITTEE

1 representative of each Participant+ Management Board and Chairs of

NUPECC, ESGARD, EURONS (all ex-officio)1 meeting/year

MANAGEMENT BOARDMANAGEMENT BOARD

Project Leader + 3 Members

MANAGEMENT SUPPORT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TEAMTEAM

1. Administrative Office2. Scientific liaison Office3. Technical coordinator

COORDINATION BOARDCOORDINATION BOARD

Management Board+ Task Leaders

+ Coordinators of HIPPI JRA and BENE Network

(ex-officio) 2-3 Meetings/year

INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANELPANEL

3 Members – 1 Meeting/year

ANNUAL PARTICIPANT ANNUAL PARTICIPANT MEETINGMEETING

1 Meeting/year

Ta

sk 2

Ta

sk 3

Ta

sk 1

MANAGEMENT STRUCTUREDesign Study


STEERING COMMITTEE

It is the governing body of the DESIGN STUDY determining the political and strategic orientation of the project: - activity planning, allocation of the resources, management

appointment, inclusion and withdrawal of contractors.

VOTING RULES: quorum 2/3 of members - usually majority 3/4 of votes

- simple majority for Chair, MB and IAP appointment - unanimous vote for inclusion or withdrawal of contractors

Design Study


Design Study


Without voting rights

With voting rightsINSTITUTION REPRESENTATIVE

1 GANIL Prof. Dominique GOUTTE2 CNRS/IN2P3 Prof. Sydney GALES3 INFN Dr. Gabriele PUGLIERIN4 CERN Dr. Enrico CHIAVERI5 UCL Dr. Marc LOISELET6 CEA Dr. N. ALAMANOS 7 NIPNE Prof. Nicolae Victor ZAMFIR8 JYU Prof. Juha AYSTO9 LMU Prof. Dietrich HABS10 FZJ Dr. Heiner BRUECHER11 FI Dr. Arturas PLUKIS 12 UW Prof. Jerzy JASTRZEBSKI

13 SAS Prof. Emil BETAK 14 U-LIVERPOOL Prof. Paul NOLAN 15 GSI Prof. Klaus SUEMMERER16 USDC Prof. Jose BENLLIURE 17 CCLRC Prof. David WARNER18 PSI Prof. Heinz GAEGGELER19 IPUL Prof. Janis FREIBERGS 20 SU MSL Prof. Anders KALLBERG

Members of EURISOL DS Steering CommitteeChaired by Juha Aysto

NUPECC CHAIRMAN Prof. Mushin HARAKEHESGARD CHAIRMAN Prof. Roy ALEKSANEURONS CHAIRMAN Prof. Alex MUELLER

MANAGEMENT BOARD

Design Study


3

1

3

1 1 1

2

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5Fr

ance Italy

Ger

man

yCer

n (E

Cr)Sw

itzer

land

Spa

in

Unite

d Kin

gdom

Finl

and

Lith

uani

aPol

and

Roman

iaLa

tvia

Belgi

umSlo

vaki

aSw

eden

Country of Origin of Participating Institutions SC-Members

MANAGEMENT BOARD (It is chaired by the Project Leader)

- Ensuring communication between consortium and EC- Taking care of all legal, contractual, financial and administrative activities- Overseeing of all technical and scientific activities - Monitoring and ensuring the Global coherence of the

project- Ensuring the respect for contract obligations and results- Securing protection, use ,dissemination of the results- Task leaders appointment- Analysing and reporting on site options and on the funding mechanism of the EURISOL facility.

- VOTING RULES: unanimous consent basis

Design Study


The Management BoardChaired by the Project Leader

Graziano Fortuna: (T1,T4,T7,T8), Project Leader Yorick Blumenfeld ( T5,T6,T11) Peter Butler ( T9, T10 ) Mats Lindroos (T2, T3, T12)

Technical Coordinator ( without voting rights)

Management Support Team

Administrative Office: R. Battistella, V. Vandevoorde Scientific liaison Office: A. Andrighetto, M. Comunian

Technical Coordinator: J. Cornell

Design Study


COORDINATION BOARD (It is chaired by the Project Leader)

1. to present reports on the progress of the individual task

2. to make proposal concerning or modifying programme to be conducted

3. to make proposal concerning the allocation or the re-allocation of specific task among the contractors

4. to draft the project reports5. to identify contractor presenting financial or

technical risks6. to resolve technical problems or any difficulty arising

in connection with the task implementation7. to foster the connectivity among the individual task8. to evaluate and favour possible synergies with other

projects

VOTING RULES: quorum 2/3 of members majority 3/4 of votes

Design Study


Design Study


TASK REPRESENTATIVE

1 Project Leader G. Fortuna1 MB Member Y. Blumenfeld1 MB Member P. Butler1 MB Member M. Lindroos2 Multi MW Target Station Y. Kadi3 Direct Target J. Lettry4 Fission Target L. Tecchio5 Safety & Radioprotection D. Ridikas6 Heavy Ion Accelerator Design M-H. Moscatello7 Proton accelerator Design A. Facco8 SC Cavity Development S. Bousson9 Beam Preparation A. Jokinen

10 Physics and Instrumentation R. Page11 Beam Intensity Calculations K.H. Schmidt12 Beta Beams Aspects M. Benedikt

Without voting rights

Technical Coordinator J. Cornell

HIPPY (CARE) Dr. Roland GAROBY

BENE (CARE)Dr. Vittorio PALLADINO

With voting rights

List of members of Coordination Board

Design Study


CB MEMBERS PER COUNTRY

4

35

1

11

France

I taly

Switzerland (CERN)

Finland

United Kingdom

Germany

INTERNATIONAL ADVISORY PANEL(appointed by the SC at the kick-off meeting)

– It is composed of three Int. Experts covering the domains of RIB Science, accelerators and high power production targets

– It is in charge with critical assessment of the technical and scientific aspects of the Project

– It may be consulted, any time, by the SC and MB on specific scientific and organizational aspects.

Members elected by SC:P.Schmor (Triumf), K. Hubner (Cern),

W. Nazarewicz (Ornl)

Design Study


Design Study


KICK-OFF MEETINGS OUTPUTS

CB kick-off meeting(Orsay 3 Feb. 05) summary and recommendations

1. Annex1 fully compatible with the content of the proposal

2. Concern about the delay between project starting date ( Feb. 1st,o5) and date of EU funds availability (July 05); difficulties are anticipated by some contractors because lack of resources

3. Need to fix reference parameters of the various parts of the facility. A set of such parameters will be collected by the TC and discussed at the next CB meeting of July 8th, 05

4. Synergies with HIPPI and BENE already exist, HIPPI and EURISOL activities on proton linacs are fully complementary ; the impact of the project Linac4 on EURISOL short and long term strategy in terms of design solutions: pulsed versus CW machines and consequences on the high power target lifetime

Design Study


SC-kick-off meeting (Orsay 4th Feb. 05)summary and recommendations

1. The need of a standing IAP was deeply debated. The consensus was reached on the basis of a Panel mission focussed on technical and scientific matters.

2. Synergies with HIPPI, BENE, EURONS and EUROTRANS were discussed. It was recommended to cultivate all the possible contacts, exchange of information, collaboration in specific WP, invitation to meetings of common interest.

3. The impact of pulsed machines on target lifetime was discussed. The subject is of extreme importance in case of driver sharing among different users ( RIB, Beta beams, neutrino factories…) Quantitative exploration to which extent a RIB target could withstand high power pulsed beam operation is needed.

4. Investigating the use of the Beta beam rings to push the RIB energies well over 100 MeV*A for secondary fragmentation. Some reference parameters should be fixed for the next SC meeting.

5. Implementation of an electronic data management to facilitate the flow of information within and outside the EURISOL community ( EDMS-CERN type suggested)

Design Study


MB kick-off meeting (Orsay Feb. 4th, 05) Summary and actions

– EURISOL web-site: implemented in the next 3 months;

– Publications: written note on the policy to be followed complying with EC rules;

– Site options: all bodies are very sensitive to this matter. According to the work plan,the MB should produce a report on site options, in a period of 6 months, starting from month 24.

– It is suggested that a draft paper containing the guidelines to face the site options problem should be presented to the next SC meeting;

– VII FP: Is there room for a new application in the contest of ESFRI roadmap? This should be decided according to the NuPECC strategy.

Design Study


Design Study


CONCLUSIONS

1. Signature of the contract (April 05, Ganil /EC)

2. Access to the contract by participants ( June 05, Ganil- Participants)

3. Signature of the Consortium Agreement (April/May 05, Participants)

Tentative dates of the 2005 official

meetings

- April, 18th : MB meeting - July, 8th : CB Meeting - October MB meeting (to be fixed) - Nov, 28th –Dec 1st : EURISOL Ds week

During the week the following meetings will take place:( *)

a) Annual participants meeting b) CB meeting c) IAP meeting d) Steering Committee meeting f) MB meeting

( *)Aim of the EURISOL week:

Review and monitor the activities of the year, check the overall project planning, extend the discussion and the confrontation on the achieved results to all community, approve the general lines (technical, scientific and financial matters) of the yearly reports, discuss and approve the activities planning for the incoming year taking into account the suggestion given by the community.

Design Study


Date post:	14-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	ferrol
View:	19 times
Download:	0 times

EURISOL DS: European Isotope Separation On-Line Radioactive Ion Beam Facility

Documents